6- Design Guide_Final.docx

DESIGN GUIDE

Schriever AFB, Colorado

23 May 2020

50th Civil Engineer Squadron

23 May 2020

TABLE OF CONTENTS

This page was intentionally left blank for duplex printing.

CHAPTER 1

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS – TABLE of CONTENTS

2.1 CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS……………………………………………………………………….2

2.2 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE………………………………………..……………………………………….2

15.1 PROJECT FEATURES……………………………………………………………………………….10

15.2 FEATURE IDENTIFICATION………………………………………………………………………………..10

16 VALUE ENGINEERING 10

CHAPTER 1

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

1 OBJECTIVE OF GUIDE

The objective of this guide is to instruct the designers on the standards, policies, and basic requirements to be used in the preparation of design analyses, drawings, cost estimates, and specifications for construction projects at Schriever AFB. Most often, this guide will be referenced or appended to a statement of work on a contract for Architectural & Engineering (AE) services or for the Simplified Acquisition Base Engineer Requirements (SABER) contract. While this guide may be referenced via other contracting mechanisms, it is written with the assumption that designer/contractor services are part of the referenced contract’s statement of work. The designer/contractor must be thoroughly familiar with the applicable contents of this guide and with the whole system of instructional guides to efficiently execute the project.

2 DESIGN CRITERIA, REGULATIONS, MANUALS AND STANDARDS

Execute all design / construction requirements in accordance with this Guide; US Department of Labor Occupational Safety and Health Standards; UFC 1-200-01 DoD Building Code (General Building Requirements), Schriever AFB Installation Facilities Standards and associated references. For designs, the AE Statement of Work (SOW) may contain or reference specific instructions, design phases, and/or project-specific requirements, which take precedence over this guide. If not specified in the AE Statement of Work, then the additional criteria references provided under each discipline section of this guide apply to the design.

For SABER contracts, the task specific Statement of Work may contain or reference specific instructions, design phases, and/or project-specific requirements, which take precedence over this guide. If not specified in the task specific Statement of Work, then the additional criteria references provided under this guide apply to the project.

Utilize the most current edition of the code or criteria (with changes) available at the time of contract award – unless noted otherwise. Any deviations to this direction will be defined in the individual statements of work and supersede any baseline requirements defined herein.

2.1 CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS (CFR)

2.2 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE (DOD)

2.3 CRITERIA ORDER OF PRECEDENCE

While effort is made to coordinate project requirements, criteria, and standards, conflicts may arise during the execution of the work. Reconcile conflicts in compliance with the following priorities and as directed by authorized Government personnel. Identify conflicts to the Government and document resolution to the Project Manager (PM).

2.3.1 Highest Priority References

Highest Order of Precedence Items are overarching requirements defined by Defense Federal Acquisition Regulations (DFARs), Federal Acquisition Regulations (FARs), Code of Federal Regulations (CFRs) and United States legal Codes (USCs) including:

(1) The applicable DFARs, FARs, CFRs, USCs, and associated Orders of Precedence defined by these regulations.

(2) Concerns associated with life safety and welfare in application of codes and criteria to which this contract is subject.

2.3.2 Moderate Priority References

Moderate Priority References are targeted clarifications, corrections, and/or revisions to the original contract. Moderate Priority References supersede Baseline Priority References to the extent that they modify the baseline requirements - but are be superseded by Highest Priority References.

(3) The project statement of work including specific requirements, standards, and criteria referenced.

(4) Published DoD Unified Facilities Criteria (UFCs) as applicable to the scope of the project, including specific criteria, versions, and references contained therein. See UFC 1-200-01 (DoD Building Code) for basic implementation, scoping, and applicability statements for the UFCs.

(5) Other Government, service, and/or agency “baseline” criteria sets as defined by the project’s Architectural and Engineer Statement of Work (SOW).

2.3.3 Baseline Priority References

(6) Government criteria, references, and standards defined by this ODDG, as applicable to the project.

(7) Industry criteria, references, and standards, as referenced and as applicable to the project.

3 DESIGN PHASES

Project scope, requirements, and criteria are described in the SOW and associated requirements documents. Design is usually accomplished in phases as outlined in paragraph 5 below, but see the project/task specific SOW for project-specific design phases and deliverable requirements. Prepare the drawings, design analysis, specifications, and cost estimate for each phase in accordance with instructions contained within the appropriate chapters of this guide and the SOW.

4 ESTIMATES

Follow the Cost Engineering Instructions in this guide and as amended by the SOW.

5 SCOPE AND SCHEDULE OF CONTRACT SERVICES

5.1 AE SERVICES

The specific design phase requirements for a project are defined in the SOW. AE contracts normally provide for one or more of the following design phases:

(1) Studies, Renderings and Models

(2) Programming/Planning Phase and/or Design Kickoff/Charrette – up to 10% design complete.

(3) Project Definition – 10 to 15% design complete.

(4) Concept Design – 30% to 35% design complete

(5) Value Engineering Phase

(6) Design Development Phase – 35% thru 65% design complete.

(7) Interim Design – 50%-65% design complete

(8) Construction Documents Phase – 65% thru 100% design complete.

(9) Final Design – Un-reviewed 100% design complete

(10) Ready to Advertise (RTA) / Issued for Construction (IFC) – Reviewed 100% final

AE services contracts may contain optional provisions, such as a value engineering review/participation, preparing color boards and furniture packages, checking of shop drawings, preparing as-built drawings, or providing engineering services during construction. Occasionally, AE contracts are for special services such as preparation of master planning studies or special reports. During the progress of the design, minor changes in basic design criteria, which are within the general scope of work, should be expected by the AE. Make necessary adjustments in work accordingly. Provide all documents required by a submittal at one time. The incremental submission of the required documents at any stage (i.e. concept, schematic designs, finals) is not acceptable, except when specifically authorized in writing. It is the designer's responsibility to complete competent, properly coordinated, and thoroughly checked design documents according to the agreed-upon contract schedules.

5.1.1 Studies, Renderings and Models

(1) Studies: At various times, studies will be required that do not conveniently fit into the design phases and procedures required in this Manual.

(2) Interior/exterior color renderings necessary for a visual presentation to the customer shall be furnished only as determined during the pre-design meeting, funded, and as directed in the SOW for AE projects.

All of these requirements will be incorporated in the project specific SOW issued to the AE on an as needed basis

5.1.2 Charrette

The need for and type of charrette will be called out in the project specific SOW.

5.2 SABER

The specific design phase requirements for a project are defined in the SOW. SABER contracts normally provide for one or more of the following design phases:

(1) Programming/Planning Phase and/or Design Kickoff/Charrette – up to 10% design complete.

(2) Project Definition – 10 to 15% design complete.

(3) Concept Design – 30% to 35% design complete

5.3 DEFINITIONS

5.3.1 Design Analysis

(1) Starting with 35% submittal provide design analysis with each submittal.

(2) At RTA, the design analysis is not a contract document, but rather final documentation of the basis of design for the 50 CES PM, and digital archival document for 50 CES. The design analysis should be developed from Concept Design to include a discussion of any new or unfamiliar products, critical product features, critical milestones that may require designer consultation, items of particular customer interest revealed in design meetings, shop drawings of particular interest or criticality, anticipated difficult construction features

(3) The design analysis is a written explanation of the project design and is expanded and revised for each submission. The design analysis shall contain a summary of the criteria for and the history of the project design, including criteria designated by the customer, letters, codes, references, conference minutes, and pertinent research. The justification for each major selection and design decision shall be clearly stated. Design calculations, computerized and manual, shall be included in the design analysis in digital format.

Narrative descriptions of design solutions shall also be included. Diagrams and sketches to convey design concepts may be provided to illustrate all written material. Design phase review comments and the specific actions (annotations) taken in response to each comment from the preceding design phase review shall be included with each submission of the design analysis. A separate section with pertinent notes to the 50 CES PM shall also be included. Specific requirements for the design analysis are provided in other chapters of this manual.

5.3.2 Drawings

Drawings are required in each design submittal. The drawings at each submittal stage shall be complete to the extent commensurate with the specific phase of design (e.g. 35%, 65% ect.), thoroughly checked, and coordinated. Specific drawing requirements are defined below and in other chapters of this Manual.

5.3.3 Specifications

The Construction Specifications Institute (CSI) 48 division format is mandatory. The specifications shall be developed in accordance with guidance provided below and in other chapters of this Manual.

5.3.4 Project Definition (10%-15%)

This submittal represents approximately 10% to 15% of the design effort, and shall be used to document and validate projects requirements and the construction cost. The submittal shall include preliminary schematic plans, a narrative describing each aspect of the project including a sustainable design points assessment checklist and narrative, and a parametric cost estimate. This level of design effort equates to the final report prepared to document charrette completion (see Chapter 23 CHARRETTES).

5.3.5 Concept Design (30%-35%)

This submittal represents approximately 30% to 35% of the design effort and shall be of sufficient detail to show how the users' functional and technical requirements will be met, indicate the designer's approach to the solution of technical problems, show compliance with design criteria or provide justification for noncompliance, and provide a preliminary, non-parametric, line-item estimate of anticipated construction costs. The Concept Design consists of:

(1) Design Analysis:

(a) Design narrative, notes to the 50 CES PM, and design calculations for all disciplines.

(b) Intended (outline form) specifications list.

(c) Environmental permitting memorandums

(2) Concept drawings.

(3) Bidding schedule with Bid Options identified when applicable.

(4) Anticipated construction cost estimate.

(5) Required information and data for each required permit.

(6) Annotated Project Definition review comments.

5.3.6 Value Engineering

(1) Shortly after or in conjunction with the Concept Design submittal, the designer shall perform a Value Engineering (VE) Study as directed in the SOW. If the SOW does not annotate the requirements for a VE Study, then disregard this section. It is strongly recommended that the VE Study be conducted at the Schriever AFB for which the project is intended, and involve user and base representatives.

(2) This effort shall include study of design memorandum documents, cost data, and other information furnished as the basis of the design. The VE study shall develop alternate designs to achieve the required mission(s) or function(s) at the lowest overall cost consistent with performance for structures, structure or facility siting, site development, equipment, electrical and materials or methods. The study includes examination of high cost items including life cycle cost, anticipated construction time, and conservation of energy. Design details and analysis will be considered and alternatives developed as appropriate. The VE team should consider the latest technology in development of alternatives to achieve maximum results for life cycle cost, energy conservation, functional use, maintainability, and first cost (construction) savings.

(3) The VE team members shall have no prior input/knowledge of the design. Following disciplines are recommended based on SOW requirements for participation; architect, civil, structural, mechanical, electrical, and cost engineering. Selected team members will be different from the design team. All members should have past experience performing VE analysis.

(4) The VE Study report can be electronic, hard copy or both depending on requirements of SOW and at a minimum should consider the following sections:

(a) Transmittal letter.

(b) Cover Sheet.

(c) Table of Contents.

(d) Summary of existing and proposed design.

(e) Study Methodology

(f) Tabulation of proposed changes with first cost savings, operations and maintenance costs, and energy savings displayed separately. Life cycle cost analysis shall be included. Present worth and annualized cost shall be computed using ten percent (10%) per annum.

(g) Advantages and disadvantages of proposed changes.

(h) Appropriate drawings for each proposed change showing the existing conditions and proposed alternatives.

(i) Parametric estimates comparing the existing design with all proposed changes.

(j) Results and conclusions.

(k) Recommendations shall include comments concerning the feasibility of implementation of each proposal. A separate summary tabulation will be included in the front of the report indicating if the change is minor of major with recommendations concerning the most efficient way to accomplish each change.

(l) List of possible design conflicts.

5.3.7 Interim Design (50%-65%)

This submittal, if required, is intended to insure that funding limitations are not being exceeded and that the drawings, design analysis, specifications, and cost estimate are proceeding in a timely manner and that the design criteria and previous review comments are being correctly interpreted. Redlined marked up specifications will be submitted at this design phase. The Interim Design shall consist of:

(1) Design Analysis developed to approximately 60% completion.

(2) Approximately 60% complete drawings including those addressing construction phasing.

(3) Detailed, line item, cost estimate to approximately 60% completion including Bid Options where applicable.

(4) Redlined marked up specifications and draft construction deliverables table (Form 66) for prospective contractors.

(5) Annotated Concept review comments.

(6) Completed permit applications (if an Interim submittal was not required, the completed permit applications are required 60 days prior to the Final submittal).

5.3.8 Final Design (Un-reviewed 100%)

This submittal represents a 100% complete design with the exception of the incorporation of any review comments resulting from the review of the submittal. The Final Design shall consist of:

(1) Design Analysis with all items l00% complete. It shall include all backup material previously submitted and revised as necessary, all design calculations, all explanatory material giving the design rationale for any design decisions which would not be obvious to an engineer reviewing the Final drawings and specifications, and any information for the 50 CES PM that will assist in administering the contract.

(2) 100% complete drawings including those addressing project construction phasing.

(3) Specifications. Final edited specifications. The contract front-end (boiler plate) will be completed by 50 CES PM and forwarded to the AE for inclusion in the Final Design Submittal. Final construction deliverables (form 66) table for prospective contractors and draft DD Form 1354

(4) Bidding schedule and an Explanation of Bid Items. Identify Bid Options where applicable.

(5) Detailed 100% complete cost estimate.

(6) Annotated Interim review comments.

(7) All supporting documentation required for permit application approvals.

(8) Submittal register based on the design

5.3.9 Ready-To-Advertise (RTA)/ Issued for Construction (IFC) (Reviewed 100%)

This submittal represents a complete design (design analysis, specifications, and drawings) and ready to advertise package including annotated design submittal review comments that answer and/or incorporate review comments resulting from the review of the Final design submittal. The intent is that this package, minus the design analysis, can then be taken by the Contracting Officer and put “on the street” for official solicitation and/or request for proposals from potential construction agents.

6 REVIEW PROCEDURES

Design verification requires Government and stakeholder review to a degree commensurate with the complexity of the project. Submittals and reviews may be required at any of the various phases. Such review will not relieve the contractor from performing all contract requirements, except as may be waived by written instruction. The SOW will indicate the specific review format and methodology required. All data prepared by the contractor will be reviewed by the Government for conformance with contract requirements; however, it is important that before submission the contractor carefully review the design and carefully check and coordinate all elements thereof to insure that the design is clear, consistent and complete. The contractor will comply with all comments noted, except as provided below, making the necessary corrections on the original drawings or data sheets. If, during the correction of data, a difference of opinion develops concerning the marked corrections, or if there are any additional changes found necessary by the contractor, contact the 50 Civil Engineer (CES) PM via telephone or email to discuss these differences. In order to facilitate checking, if either (1) the contractor has made changes other than those necessary to comply with contract comments or (2) following attempts to resolve differences, there are still 50 CES comments which are not complied with, the contractor will annotate the "50 CES Comments" in the manner prescribed hereafter. Such explanatory notes will fully explain the reasons for non-compliance. In the event that a comment was mutually agreed upon by the 50 CES to be withdrawn or partially changed, such annotation will indicate the date the decision was made, the venue (i.e. teleconference, face-to-fact meeting, email exchange) and which PM agreed to the non-compliance (i.e., Provide ceramic tile in lieu of stained concrete in Toilet 102, because . . . per telecon . . . date . . . between Smith and Peters).

6.1 REVIEW SYSTEM.

The contractor will formulate a Comment Resolution Matrix excel spreadsheet. Refer to Attachment A for an example

7 AUSTERITY IN DESIGN

Perform all design and construction consistent with principles of maximum economy. Such economy can only be gained by applying the greatest amount of architectural excellence in a way that is sensitive to the surrounding community, is consistent to the specific needs of the building's users, is aesthetically compatible with the local environment, is responsive to the issues of energy efficiency, and is harmonious with the highest principles of good design. Select materials and finishes in compliance with the Schriever AFB Installation Facility Standards (IFS) in order to provide the best blend of visual appearance, maintainability, and low first cost. Where the designer has made choices, which are called into, question by the reviewers, it is 50 CES policy not to require change to the design except where valid and specific reasons can be identified. Mere differences in design opinion are insufficient reasons to require the designer to change the aesthetic direction of his/her product.

8 USE OF COMPUTER-AIDED ANALYTICAL PROGRAMS

50 CES encourages the use of computer-aided analytical and design tools whenever this will result in cost reductions and/or improved design. When used, comply with the following instructions. These instructions establish procedures to facilitate monitoring to assure that designs are consistent with conventional methods and 50 CES standards are attained, and that maximum benefits are realized from system integration and data feedback.

8.1 IDENTIFY PROGRAMS

Furnish write-ups and/or identify programs, which the AE intends to use on major features of the work as part of the preliminary submittal. Include sufficient detail so that the general method of solution and problem limitations may be identified and problem data may be assembled for trial runs by PM, if desired. When programs not otherwise identified are implemented while the work is in progress, include enough input data and intermediate results to afford manual checks on the final results.

8.2 DESCRIPTION OF PROGRAMS

When designs are accomplished by computer-aided analytical programs, the design analysis will include description of design methods, including assumptions, theories, and technical formulas employed. Copies of computer program input data and output listings will be presented, annotated in language understandable by personnel not familiar with the computer program systems, and accompanied by diagrams and notations of sufficient detail to facilitate manual checks of final results. Computer programs employed will be described so that the general methods of solution and program limitation are identified. Indicate location of the form of computer input data utilized in the design analysis.

8.3 DATA FILES

Unless otherwise specified, data files used for final computations must be retained by the designer for the life of the construction contract. Provide these materials to PM, without additional cost, at any time during said period, and with each electronic design submittal package.

8.4 SPECIAL CONDITIONS

The government’s approval of any computer program or acceptance of computed results does not relieve an AE of any responsibility for accuracy of data or technical validity of assumptions and formula used.

9 SAFETY

Include the necessary features required to produce a facility in which safety has been incorporated so as to conform to the established safety codes and regulations. Give particular attention to such safety features as snow guards, windscreens, mechanical equipment guards, stairway head clearances, handrails, access hatches, ladder climbing devices, fixed ladders, and non-slip treads.

10 SUSTAINABLE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT

Sustainable Design and Development (SDD) is an integrated approach to planning, designing, constructing, operating and maintaining facilities in an environmentally-sensitive manner. The main objectives of sustainable design are to avoid resource depletion of energy, water, and raw materials; prevent environmental degradation caused by facilities and infrastructure throughout their life cycle; and create built environments that are livable, comfortable, safe, and productive. The Department of Defense embraces SDD principles and has outlined its goals and requirements in UFC 1-200-02. See Chapter 22, SUSTAINABLE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT and the SOW for specific requirements.

11 ADVANCED MODELING (CAD/BIM/CIM/GIS)

Advanced modeling is a subset of geospatial information to include Building Information Modeling (BIM), Civil Information Modeling (CIM), Geographic Information Systems (GIS), and Computer-Aided Design (CAD). Advanced modeling deliverables are models and drawings that form a digital representation of the project design, or part thereof, comprised of "Model Elements" with Facility and Site Data. Advanced modeling deliverables must be produced and formatted to comply with the minimum quality requirements defined in Chapter 16, ADVANCED MODELING REQUIREMENTS AND TECHNIQUES.

12 UNITS OF MEASURE

Complete designs in English inch-pounds (I-P) units of measure. A neutral measurement is indicated by an identifier, which has no expressed relation to either an SI or I-P value (e.g. American Wire Gage (AWG) which indicates thickness but in itself is neither SI nor I-P).

13 PUBLIC RELEASE OF INFORMATION

Refer any inquiries regarding a specific project to Schriever AFB Contracting Officer associated with the project, for a path forward. Do not publicize or release in any manner information or data in regard to projects which are being worked on or negotiated with Schriever AFB. Do not discuss - prior to public release by Schriever AFB - a project, any future program, or any planning with anyone not directly concerned with the design of the project or with an explicit need-to-know basis.

14 CLASSIFIED INFORMATION

Classified information obtained from the Government will be treated in accordance with DD Form 254 and regulations specified in the contract concerning the protection of classified material. Return all such data to Contracting Officer and/or PM upon completion of design and prior to finalization of contract.

15 ENGINEERING INSPECTIONS/FIELD VISITS

15.1 PROJECT FEATURES

Many projects contain features, which must be built exactly as designed. Any changes to accommodate field conditions can result in the feature not adequately performing its required function. Any such changes should only be made at the direction of the designers, and may necessitate a visit to the construction site by the designer during critical construction periods. Use site visits to inspect the project features to verify how field conditions compare with expected conditions, to observe conditions not fully covered in the design, and to assist field personnel in interpreting plans and specifications. The time and number of these field visits are dependent upon the project, and requirements will be defined in the SOW

15.2 FEATURE IDENTIFICATION

Clearly identify critical features of work in the design documents that are of critical importance. Edit the specifications to require the construction contractor to submit for review and approval by the designer, sufficient submittals to assure that the critical requirements have been adequately addressed prior to physical construction. In addition, prepare Engineering Considerations and Instructions (ECIs) for those elements of the design that must be built as designed or that require designer approval for changes to accommodate field conditions. See Chapter 17 DESIGN ANALYSIS for additional information.

16 VALUE ENGINEERING

Each project with a Programmed Amount (PA) of $2 million or more is required to have Value Engineering oversight. This oversight is carried out by the 50 CES Project Manager. A determination of Value Engineering level of effort is to take place at the outset of the project design effort and Value Engineering activities are to take place no later Than the 35 percent concept design phase of a project.

The level of effort for an individual project can be as much as a multi-week, multi-disciplinary Value Engineering study conducted by a Certified Value Specialist (CVS), to a five- day (40 hours), multi-disciplinary Value Engineering study conducted by a CVS, to as little as a Low Opportunity Value Management Plan (VMP) that documents the scope of the project and why additional Value Engineering efforts outside of the determination of Low Opportunity for Value Engineering benefit is unnecessary.

As with any 50 CES policy guidance, changes can and do occur from time to time and projects should always comply with the current 50 CES guidance regardless of what is contained in the design guide. Consult with the 50 CES PM to ensure that current guidance is being followed.

9 April 2020

1 - 8

ATTACHMENT A

COMMENT REVIEW MATRIX

Submittal

Project #:

Project Title:

Reviewer (Name):

Reviewer (Org):

CE PM:

Date Reviewed:

CHAPTER 2

SITE DESIGN

1 GENERAL 3

2 DESIGN CRITERIA 3

3 DESIGN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS. 4

3.6 READY TO ADVERTISE (RTA)/ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION (IFC)

(REVIEWED 100%) 9

4 DRAWING COMPOSITION. 9

5 SITE STUDY. 9

6 SITE LAYOUT GUIDANCE 10

7 LANDSCAPE DESIGN GUIDANCE. 11

8 LAWN IRRIGATION SYSTEM GUIDANCE. 11

9 PETROLEUM FUEL FACILITIES. 11

10 COMMON DEFICIENCIES. 11

11 ENGINEERING CONSIDERATIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS (ECI) TO FIELD PERSONNEL. 12

24 April 2020

2 - 5

CHAPTER 2

SITE DESIGN

1 GENERAL

The instructions in this chapter provide guidance for the design criteria to be used for site and landscape design of a construction project. Excellence in design is a primary goal for all construction projects.

Reaching this goal is largely determined by site and landscape design and requires a commitment to quality that is sensitive to both the environment and needs of the facility users. Attention should be given to functional requirements, an aesthetic solution compatible with the surrounding area, life-cycle cost, energy conservation and reducing maintenance. Recognize that quality design does not imply added expense, and can provide savings in operating, maintenance and construction costs.

2 DESIGN CRITERIA

Design in accordance with the instructions contained in this Chapter and in other applicable chapters of the this Design Guide. Use applicable criteria from the following list in the design of this project. Utilize the most current edition of the code or criteria (with changes) available at the time of contract award; unless noted otherwise.

2.1 DESIGN CRITERIA, REGULATIONS, MANUALS AND STANDARDS

2.1.1 Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC).

2.1.2 Schriever Air Force Base

Installation Design Guide. (IDG)

2.1.3 American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO)

(1) A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets

(2) Guide for Transportation Landscape and Environmental Design

(3) Guide for the Planning, Design, and Operation of Pedestrian Facilities

2.1.4 Accessibility Standards

36 CFR 1191 Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Accessibility Guidelines for Buildings and Facilities; Architectural Barriers Act (ABA) Accessibility Guidelines.

2.1.5 American Nursery & Landscape Association (ANLA)

ANSI/ANLA Z60.1 American Standard for Nursery Stock

2.1.6 United States Department of Agriculture (USDA)

USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) for: Seed Mixes, Rates and Fertilizers

2.1.7 State and Local Agencies

University Agronomists and County Agricultural Extension Services for: Seed Mixes, Rates, and Fertilizers

2.1.8 U.S. Federal Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration

Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD)

2.2 SCHRIEVER SPACE FORC BASE DETAILS

Landscape details specific to a project, other than what is required in this chapter, shall be provided in the project Statement of Work (SOW)

3 DESIGN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS

3.1 PROGRAMMING CHARRETTE DESIGN

If a charrette is required by the project SOW, refer to chapter 23

3.2 PROJECT DEFINITION (10% - 15%)

3.2.1 Drawings

(1) Vicinity Map and Location Plan The Vicinity Map is a small- scale drawing showing the location of the installation, area, or community in relationship to surrounding cities and roads, similar to a road map. Show the project’s location, the Contractor’s Access Route and Staging Area on the installation or within the area or community in the Location Plan.

(2) Removal Plan Show the existing site before construction and the removals required by the construction of this project in the Removal Plan. Include the field survey (or designer’s developed CAD file when survey is not yet completed) to show all above and below ground utilities, buildings, roads, parking, walks, trees, turf, walls, storage tanks, foundations, athletic facilities and existing contours. Appropriately label and hatch all items known to require removal, relocation, or modification.

(3) Site Plan Show the basic site layout and existing site features and structures to remain on the project site in the Site Plan. Label new fencing, pavements, and structures to indicate material types. Show key dimensions. Ensure new work is clearly evident from existing features. Incorporate comments from the previous submittal, applicable regulations and restrictions for clearances and setbacks; i.e., anti-terrorism, and explosive clearance zones, etc., as well as any specific orientation requests made by the User.

3.2.2 Design Analysis (DA)

For general requirements see Chapter 17, DESIGN ANALYSIS. Provide list of design criteria. Give the basis and reasons for design, i.e., goals, objectives and priorities. Clearly explain the recommended site development concept. Address energy conservation measures taken in the site design. Document pollution prevention measures and other environmental considerations made during design.

3.2.3 Review Conference

A Review Conference must be attended by the Architect-Engineer’s site/landscape designer, or a representative thereof. The conference will typically be held at the installation, with representatives of the installation and the Architect-Engineer firm being in attendance. The purpose of the conference is to discuss comments on the project definition design documents. Include approved comments in future submittals. Compile site information and requirements during the meeting and include in the meeting minutes that are prepared by the Architect-Engineer upon completion of the Conference.

3.3 CONCEPT DESIGN (30% - 35%)

3.3.1 Drawings

(1) Vicinity Map and Location Plan The Vicinity Map is a small- scale drawing showing the location of the installation, area, or community in relationship to surrounding cities and roads, similar to a road map. Show the project’s location, the Contractor’s Access Route and Staging Area on the installation or within the area or community on the Location Plan.

(2) Removal Plan Show the existing site before construction and the removals required by the construction of this project in the Removal Plan. Include the field survey (or designer’s developed CAD file when survey is not yet completed) to show all above and below ground utilities, buildings, roads, parking, walks, trees, turf, walls, storage tanks, foundations, athletic facilities and existing contours in the Removal Plan. Appropriately label and hatch all items to be removed, relocated or modified.

(3) Site Plan Show the site layout, site structures, special features, and existing site features and structures to remain on the project site in the Site Plan. The more intricate aspects of design have not been developed at this stage of the design. Label new fencing, pavements, and structures shall be labeled to indicate material types. Key dimensions will be shown. New work will be clearly evident from existing features. Incorporate comments from the previous submittal, applicable regulations and restrictions for clearances and setbacks; i.e., anti-terrorism and explosive clearance zones, etc., as well as any specific orientation requests made by the User.

3.3.2 Design Analysis (DA)

For general requirements see Chapter 17, Design Analysis. Include a summary of the basic information and conclusions presented in the previous submittal in the DA. Provide list of design criteria. Give the basis and reasons for design, i.e., goals, objectives and priorities. Clearly explain the recommended site development. Address energy conservation measures taken in the site design. Document pollution prevention measures and other environmental considerations made during design. Give landscape design considerations with regard to site conditions, climate, soils, water, erosion, in selection of materials.

3.3.3 Review Conference

A Review Conference must be attended by the Architect-Engineer’s site/landscape designer, or a representative thereof. The conference will typically be held at the installation, with representatives of the installation and the Architect-Engineer firm being in attendance. The purpose of the conference is to discuss comments on the project definition design documents. Include approved comments in future submittals. Compile site information and requirements during the meeting and include in the meeting minutes that are prepared by the Architect-Engineer upon completion of the Conference.

3.4 INTERIM DESIGN (50% - 65%)

3.4.1 Drawings

(1) Vicinity Map and Location Plan The Vicinity Map is a small- scale drawing showing the location of the installation, area, or community in relationship to surrounding cities and roads, similar to a road map. The Location Plan shall show the project’s location, the Contractor’s Access Route and Staging Area on the installation or within the area or community.

(2) Removal Plan Show the existing site before construction and the removals required by the construction of this project in the Removal Plan. Include the field survey (or designer’s developed CAD file when survey is not yet completed) to show all above and below ground utilities, buildings, roads, parking, walks, trees, turf, walls, storage tanks, foundations, athletic facilities and existing contours. Appropriately label and hatch all items to be removed, relocated or modified.

(3) Site Plan Show the site layout, site structures, special features, and existing site features and structures to remain on the project site in the Preliminary Site Plan. The more intricate aspects of design are under development at this stage of the design. Label new fencing, pavements, and structures to indicate material types. Show key dimensions. Ensure new work is clearly evident from existing features. Incorporate comments from the previous submittal, applicable regulations and restrictions for clearances and setbacks; i.e., anti- terrorism and explosive clearance zones, etc., as well as any specific orientation requests made by the User.

3.4.2 Drawings

Provide detailed drawings of site furnishings; accessories; handicapped parking and provisions; and specific construction techniques, applications, and finishes when graphical clarification is necessary for design interpretation or construction quality. Not all details are required with this submittal, but sufficient details to allow for customer and engineering comments on the design shall be provided.

3.4.3 Design Analysis (DA)

For general requirements see Chapter 17, Design Analysis. Include a summary of the basic information and conclusions presented in the previous submittal in the DA. Provide list of design criteria. Give the basis and reasons for design, i.e., goals, objectives and priorities. Clearly explain the recommended site development. Address energy conservation measures taken in the site design. Document pollution prevention measures and other environmental considerations made during design.

3.4.4 Review Conference

A Review Conference must be attended by the Architect-Engineer’s site/landscape designer, or a representative thereof. The conference will typically be held at the installation, with representatives of the installation and the Architect-Engineer firm being in attendance. The purpose of the conference is to discuss comments on the project definition design documents. Include approved comments in future submittals. Compile site information and requirements during the meeting and include in the meeting minutes that are prepared by the Architect-Engineer upon completion of the Conference.

3.5 FINDAL DESING (UN-REVIEWED 100%)

The final design documents must include all information for bidding and construction of the project. Specific requirements for plans, specifications and design analysis are as follows:

3.5.1 Vicinity Map and Location Plan

Vicinity Map consists of a small scale drawing of the overall project area, similar to a road map. Location Plan consists of a small scale drawing showing the surrounding area and the project site. The Location Plan shall show:

(1) Contractor’s Access and Haul Routes Show access and haul routes with any load limits. Coordinate requirements with local engineering and construction offices.

(2) Waste and Borrow Sites/Areas Determine the waste and/or borrow sites for all non-HTRW (Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste) materials for the project. Clearly identify waste and/or borrow areas on the Location Plan showing the material acceptable for borrow or waste. Areas selected must meet all existing regulations for pollution control and environmental quality as established by the city, county, state, and federal governmental agencies. Confirm the types of materials which may, or may not, be disposed of in waste areas.

(3) Contractor-Furnished Trailer Show on the Location Plan and the Site Plan, contractor furnished mobile home trailer for Government construction inspector’s use, if this temporary facility is required.

(4) Contractor’s Staging Area and Parking Show areas for contractor storage, temporary fencing, sheds, and parking for subcontractors and their employees. Coordinate requirements with the engineering and construction offices.

3.5.2 Removal Plan

Show the existing site before construction and the removals required by construction of this project on the Removal Plan. Include the field survey to show all above and below ground utilities, buildings, roads, parking, walks, trees, turf, walls, storage tanks, foundations, athletic facilities and existing contours. Removals required by all aspects of the design have been fully coordinated at final design and are shown on the Removal Plan. When, for reasons of clarity, a removal must be shown on a different plan, such as the Electrical Site Plan; reference said plan, by sheet number, on the Removal Plan. Appropriately label and hatch all items to be removed, relocated or modified. Clearly mark the extents or limits of removals.

3.5.3 Site Plan

Incorporate approved comments from previous design submittal. Fully dimension and label as necessary to field locate each item to be constructed. Show all existing physical features within and adjacent to the work site that will remain after the proposed construction has been completed. Ensure new work is clearly evident from existing features. Meet applicable regulations and restrictions for clearances and setbacks.

3.5.4 Site Details

Provide detailed drawings of site furnishings; accessories; handicapped parking and provisions; and specific construction techniques, applications, and finishes when graphical clarification is necessary for design interpretation and construction quality.

3.5.5 Landscape Plan

If landscaping is included in the project scope, prepare a Landscape Plan.

(1) Plants Show all trees, shrubs, plant beds, landscape-related furnishings, landscape edging in the Landscape Plan. Show beds or areas that are to receive decorative mulches. Include a plant materials list in the Plan. Include botanical names; common names; the appropriate size in caliper, height or size of container, i.e., 3 meter (10 foot) high or 21 Liter (5-gallon) container; the method transplanting such as bare root, balled and burlapped, container grown; and special comments such as 1-year old seedlings, or "symmetrical form with branching at 2 meter (6 foot) height minimum". Also show any wetlands plantings or any other re- vegetation requirements necessary for the project.

(2) Seeding and Sodding Show all unsurfaced ground areas disturbed by construction to be seeded, sodded on the Landscape Plan. When a landscape design is not being provided with a project, unsurfaced ground areas to receive seeding, show sodding or erosion control on the Site Plan.

(3) Landscape Details Provide details for installing the plants and constructing the plant beds, landscaping furnishings and accessories. Use the Omaha District Corps of Engineers standard landscape details available on the internet.. They may require software and unit measurement conversion. Verify the methods of planting meets the project site requirements and modify the generic landscape details as local practices dictate. Provide all additional designs and details as necessary for furnishings and accessories not included in the standard details.

(4) Erosion and Sediment Control Plan Coordinate this plan with Chapter 5, PAVEMENT, GRADING, DRAINAGE, AND OTHER CIVIL and Chapter 6, ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION. When this Plan is required, the show requirements for any berms and dikes, diversion ditches and swales, retention or sediment basins, silt fences, temporary…