16- Section L and M.pdf

Section L - Instructions, Conditions and Notices to Offerors

PROPOSAL PREPARATION

A. General Instructions: This section provides general guidance for preparing proposals, as well as specific instructions on the format and content of the proposal. Throughout this section, the term “offeror” means the prime contractor submitting the proposal. The offeror’s proposal must include all data and information requested and must be submitted in accordance with these instructions. Any offeror who submits an incomplete package may be considered non-responsive. The offer shall be compliant with the requirements as stated in the Request for Proposal (RFP). A proposal that is sufficiently documented to support cost/price and technical requirements in a complete, orderly and detailed manner will enable the Government to perform a thorough and fair evaluation. Non-compliance with the instructions and RFP may result in an unfavorable proposal evaluation and may be grounds to eliminate the proposal from consideration for contract award.

Offeror’s must clearly identify any exception to the solicitation terms and conditions and provide complete accompanying rationale along with providing any assumptions in their proposals.

B. Type of Acquisition: Competition will be limited to competitive Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small

Business (SDVOSB) firms located within Colorado and Wyoming geographical competitive area, and the assigned NAICS code. All other SDVOSB Business Development (BD) participants are deemed ineligible to submit offers. For this acquisition, selection of the best value offeror(s) will be made using Lowest Priced Technically Acceptable (LPTA) procedures with the technical factors evaluated on an "acceptable/unacceptable" basis.

C. Discrepancies and Ambiguities: If an offeror believes the requirements in these instructions contain an error, omission, ambiguity or are otherwise unsound, the offeror shall immediately notify the Contracting Officer in writing with supporting rationale no later than five (5) calendar days after the RFP release.

D. Mistakes: Mistakes in an offeror’s proposal shall be handled in accordance with FAR 14.407-4 as referenced in FAR 15.508.

E. Postponement of Proposal Closing Date: If a determination is made to postpone the proposal closing date, an announcement of the determination will be posted to Federal Business Opportunities (FBO) via www.beta.SAM.gov and, if practicable, before issuance of a formal RFP amendment otherwise communicated to prospective offerors.

F. Post-Award/Pre-Performance Conference: A post-award/pre-performance conference will be scheduled.

The offeror or its duly authorized representative is required to attend the post-award/pre-performance conference.

G. Discussions: If discussions or requests for revised proposals are conducted or requested by the Government, the coefficient prices identified in Schedule B of the final revised proposals shall be valid through the proposal acceptance period (SF 1442 Block 13 D).

H. Contract Document: Sections K, L and M apply to the solicitation phase only; therefore, they will not be a physical part of the resulting contract.

I. Points of Contact (POC): The POCs for this acquisition are the Contracting Officer (CO), Jan A. Mangubat and the Contracting Specialists (CS), Melanie Briggs. Written requests for clarification may be sent to the CO/CS. Address any questions or concerns to them using the following contact information:

Jan A, Mangubat Contracting Officer jan.mangubat@spaceforce.mil

50 CONS/PKA

mailto:jan.mangubat@spaceforce.mil

210 Falcon Parkway, Suite 2116 Schriever AFB, CO 80912-5006 Phone: (719) 567-3456

Melanie Briggs Contract Specialist melanie.briggs.1@spaceforce.mil

50 CONS/PKA

210 Falcon Parkway, Suite 2116 Schriever AFB, CO 80912-5006

Phone: (719) 567-3763

L-1 PROPOSAL PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS

The proposal package must be delivered to the address in Block 7 of the SF 1442 prior to the time set for closing of proposals; see Block 13A of the SF 1442.

A. To ensure timely and equitable evaluation of proposals, offerors must follow the instructions contained herein.

Proposals must be complete, self-sufficient, and respond directly to the requirements of this solicitation;

alternate proposals will not be accepted. The response will consist of two (2) separate factors; Factor I – Technical Proposal, and Factor II – Executed Contract Documentation and Price Proposal.

B. The Contracting Officer has determined there is a high probability of adequate price competition in this acquisition. Upon examination of the initial offers, the Contracting Officer will review this determination and if, in the Contracting Officer's opinion, adequate price competition exists, no additional cost information will be requested and certification under FAR 15.406-2 will not be required. However, if at any time during this competition, the Contracting Officer determines that adequate price competition no longer exists, offerors may be required to submit information to the extent necessary for the Contracting Officer to determine the reasonableness of the price.

C. Format for proposal Factors I and II shall be as follows:

1. The contractor will either mail, hand carry, or e-mail their proposal to the below address no later than the date specified in Block 13 of the 1442. Submission via DoD Secure Access File Exchange (DoD SAFE) (safe.apps.mil) is the preferred method. A receipt confirmation is recommended.

50th Contracting Squadron Attn: Jan A. Mangubat 210 Falcon Parkway, Suite 2116 Schriever AFB, 80912-5006 Email: jan.mangubat@spaceforce.mil

2. HAND-CARRIED PROPOSALS NOTICE: Offerors are cautioned that Schriever AFB (SAFB) has stringent visitor control procedures requiring individuals not affiliated with the installation to obtain a visitor pass and be cleared by the Government POC to be visited prior to entrance. A request must be received by the above Contracting Specialists at least five (5) days prior to requested entry for an offeror to gain entrance onto SAFB. It is possible the POC may not be available to clear offerors for entrance, which may prohibit submission of hand-carried proposals; consequently, offerors electing to hand-carry their proposals for submittal just prior to closing time do so at their own risk.

3. Hard copy proposals will be accompanied by either a DVD with electronic versions of the proposal document and all associated attachments, or, an e-mail with the proposal document and all associated attachments. Please be advised that the Schriever AFB firewalls or servers may delay or prevent the electronic transfer of large data files (10 MB) via e-mail.

4. The proposals will be on 8 1/2” x 11” paper, white or ivory stock. Charts, tables or diagrams may not exceed 11” x 17”.

mailto:melanie.briggs.1@spaceforce.mil

5. A page is defined as one face of a sheet of paper containing information. This includes all appendices, charts, graphs, diagrams, tables, photographs, etc, unless placed on 11” x 17” sheets, in which case they will be counted as two (2) pages. Covers for factors, tables of contents, indices, title pages, cross reference indices and section dividers/tables will not be included in the page count if they are inserted solely to provide ease to the reader in locating factors/sections of the proposal. They will be counted if they contain any other information, (e.g. diagrams, extraneous data, etc). Pages marked “This page intentionally left blank” will not be counted. Pages in excess of the page count stated in the table below will not be read, and will be removed and returned to the offeror.

6. Type face will not be less than 12-font, with 1” margins on all sides. Smaller, legible font size, no smaller than 6-point, may be used for charts and tables.

7. Submission via DoD Secure Access File Exchange (DoD SAFE) (safe.apps.mil) is the preferred method. A receipt confirmation is recommended. Elaborate formats, bindings or color presentations are not desired or required. Company Name and solicitation number shall be included in the header of each page. Each attachment will be labeled with the following format: FA2550-21-R-0003, COMPANY NAME, Factor I Technical Proposal; and Factor II Executed Contract Documentation and Price Proposal. See Table Below for specific number of copies required and pages, etc.

TITLE HARD COPIES PAGE MAXIMUM DVDs Volume I - Executed Contract Documentation and Price Proposal

Original and one (1) copy

No page limitation 1

Volume II - Technical Proposal Original and one (1) copy

10 pages 1

8. Proposal revisions shall conform to the requirements of this section and must be clearly marked to show the changes, on different color stock as directed by the Contracting Officer. If a change is made to a spreadsheet, highlight the changed cells.

9. Documents submitted in response to this solicitation must be fully responsive to and consistent with the following:

a) Requirements of the solicitation, and Government standards (e.g. Facilities Excellence Plan) and regulations (e.g. Building Codes) pertaining to the specification.

b) Evaluation Factors for Award in Section M of this solicitation.

c) Any limitation on the number of proposal pages.

10. The total program ceiling for all contracts, to include option periods, is $5 million. Task order ordering range is from $2,000.00 to $2,000,000.00.

D. Specific Instructions, SUBMIT THE FOLLOWING:

VOLUME I – Executed Contract Documentation and COEFFICIENT (PRICE) PROPOSAL

1. Chapter 1 - SF 1442. Complete applicable blanks. In doing so, the offeror accedes to the contract terms and conditions as written in the RFP Sections A through J. These sections constitute the model contract

2. Definition of coefficients IAW AF Construction Guide 1 Oct 2019; 3.2.1.2 Coefficients. “Coefficients are factors applied to the standard unit prices in the UPG to calculate the overall task order pricing. Awardees of contracts with coefficients, such as SABER contracts, have coefficients which increase or decrease the order costs for areas such as overhead, profit, minimum design costs, G&A expenses, bond premiums, and gross receipt taxes.”

“3.2.1.2.2. An offeror's proposed coefficients provide insight into their experience and knowledge of the local construction market. Typically, we expect proposed coefficients of less than 1 in a strong competitive market.”

For this SAFB Painting IDIQ, coefficients will be used as described above. The awardee of this IDIQ have coefficients which increase or decrease the order costs for areas such as overhead, profit, G&A expenses, bond premiums, and gross receipt taxes.

The contractor shall provide all personnel, equipment, tools, materials, supplies, transportation, supervision and other items and services necessary to perform Protective Coating Maintenance (PCM) for Schriever Air Force Base (SAFB) in accordance with Attachment 1 – MFPR IDIQ Statement of Work (SOW), dated 14 Aug 2020, Attachment 17 - Coefficient Schedule B

3. Chapter 2 - Section B. Insert the proposed coefficient in Section B (Attachment 17 worksheets) for each coefficient including the option periods. Limit coefficient to four (4) decimal places. The offeror’s price proposal shall contain downward-sloping pricing for the total weighted average coefficient for each option period. Downward-sloping pricing must be reflected by the fourth decimal place (see example below). Offers which do not comply with this requirement shall be considered non-responsive and not eligible for award. Include the coefficient worksheet.

Standard Hours-Secured Area (Order $750,000 and Below) 43% Standard Hours-Secured Area (Order Above $750,000) 1% Standard Hours-Non-Secured Area (Order $750,000 and Below) 49% Standard Hours-Non-Secured Area (Order Above $750,000) 1% Non-Standard Hours-Secured Area (Order $750,000 and Below) 3% Non-Standard Hours-Secured Area (Order Above $750,000) 1% Non-Standard Hours-Non-Secured Area (Order $750,000 and Below) 1% Non-Standard Hours-Non-Secured Area (Order Above $750,000) 1% Total: 100%

COEFFICIENT SCHEDULE B

Base Period: DATE OF AWARD, THROUGH 31 JANUARY 2024

B0001 Standard Hours-Secured Area (Order $750,000 and Below) ______________ B0002 Standard Hours-Secured Area (Order Above $750,000) ______________ B0003 Standard Hours-Non-Secured Area (Order $750,000 and Below) ______________ B0004 Standard Hours-Non-Secured Area (Order Above $750,000) ______________ B0005 Non-Standard Hours-Secured Area (Order $750,000 and Below) ______________ B0006 Non-Standard Hours-Secured Area (Order Above $750,000) ______________ B0007 Non-Standard Hours-Non-Secured Area (Order $750,000 and Below) ______________ B0008 Non-Standard Hours-Non-Secured Area (Order Above $750,000) ______________

Option Period One:

B0009 Standard Hours-Secured Area (Order $750,000 and Below) ______________ B0010 Standard Hours-Secured Area (Order Above $750,000) ______________ B0011 Standard Hours-Non-Secured Area (Order $750,000 and Below) ______________ B0012 Standard Hours-Non-Secured Area (Order Above $750,000) ______________ B0013 Non-Standard Hours-Secured Area (Order $750,000 and Below) ______________ B0014 Non-Standard Hours-Secured Area (Order Above $750,000) ______________ B0015 Non-Standard Hours-Non-Secured Area (Order $750,000 and Below) ______________ B0016 Non-Standard Hours-Non-Secured Area (Order Above $750,000) ______________

Option Period Two:

B0017 Standard Hours-Secured Area (Order $750,000 and Below) ______________ B0018 Standard Hours-Secured Area (Order Above $750,000) ______________ B0019 Standard Hours-Non-Secured Area (Order $750,000 and Below) ______________ B0020 Standard Hours-Non-Secured Area (Order Above $750,000) ______________ B0021 Non-Standard Hours-Secured Area (Order $750,000 and Below) ______________ B0022 Non-Standard Hours-Secured Area (Order Above $750,000) ______________ B0023 Non-Standard Hours-Non-Secured Area (Order $750,000 and Below) ______________ B0024 Non-Standard Hours-Non-Secured Area (Order Above $750,000) ______________

4. Chapter 3 – Section C through J. Complete applicable blanks. The offeror shall submit only those pages that require a fill-in.

5. Chapter 4 – Section K. Complete the Representations and Certifications in Section K of the RFP. Section K shall be returned in its entirety. If the Representations and Certifications in Section K are completed through System for Award Management (SAM.gov), then Section K need not be submitted. Instead attach a copy of the SAM.gov representations, certifications and acknowledgments in this chapter of the proposal.

6. Acknowledge all amendments issued to the solicitation and include a signed copy of each amendment in this chapter of the proposal.

7. Joint Venture Agreements: Joint Ventures are allowable on competitive SDVOSB set-asides; however, the joint venture agreement must be received by SBA prior to proposal due date and approved before award of any resulting contract. If you are contemplating a joint venture on this project, you must advise, in writing, your assigned SBA Business Opportunity Specialist (BOS) as soon as possible. It is also recommended that the agreement be submitted to your assigned SBA BOS as soon as practicable to ensure compliance with established regulations. Any corrections and/or changes needed can be made only when your BOS has had adequate time for a thorough review before the proposal due date. NO CORRECTIONS AND/OR

CHANGES ARE ALLOWED AFTER TIME OF SUBMISSION OF PROPOSAL OR BIDS.

8. A letter of authorization for the Contracting Officer to verify offeror’s financial responsibility. Include name, address and phone numbers for financial institution(s), to include points of contact.

VOLUME II -TECHNICAL PROPOSAL

Offerors must be acceptable in all factors/sub-factors of the Technical Factor to be determined technically “acceptable”. The standard to pass is defined in Section “M” for each sub-factor.

1. Offerors will complete and submit the following:

a) Solicitation Number

b) Project Title and Contract Total Amount

c) Description

d) Period of Performance

e) Customer’s name and title

f) Customer’s contact number and email

The proposals will be evaluated against the following technical subfactor criteria:

Sub-Factor 1: Organizational Experience. An acceptable offer will provide evidence of a minimum of two (2) years job experience performing in the following areas:

(1) Mudding and taping drywall

(2) Exterior metal painting

(3) “Multispec” painting.

Sub-Factor 2: Demonstration Project – Offeror must provide a solution to the Demonstration Project in accordance with the Statement of Work, Technical Requirements, and Specifications.

1. A cover page including the project title, total project cost, list of assumptions, list of requirements, performance period, material lead times, and any special considerations such as phasing of work.

2. A written narrative describing approach to the subject project

3. Drawings to show the intended work

4. A schedule showing the offeror’s intended progression, breakout of major work components, any permits required, etc. for the project and progression of work effort from task order award to completion

5. A Schedule of Material Submittals schedule which identifies all items that have a material effect on the

Demonstration Project

6. Project Cost Estimate

(end Section L)

Section M - Evaluation Factors for Award

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

52.217-5 Evaluation Of Options JUL 1990

EVALUATION FACTORS

SOURCE SELECTION

A. Basis for Contract Award. This is a Lowest Price, Technically Acceptable (LPTA) source selection conducted in accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 15, Contracting by Negotiation, as supplemented by the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS), the Air Force Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (AFFARS), DoD Source Selection Procedures, Appendix A, and Air Force Mandatory Procedures

5315.3. These regulations are available electronically at the ACQUISITION.GOV site. The Government will select the proposal(s) with the lowest total evaluated price from among those rated as “Acceptable” for all Technical Sub- Factors. Contract(s) may be awarded to the offeror(s) deemed responsible in accordance with the FAR Part 9.1, as supplemented, and determined eligible by Small Business Administration in accordance with FAR 19.9, whose proposal conforms to the solicitation’s requirements (to include all stated terms, conditions, representations, certifications, and all other information required by Section L of this solicitation) and is judged, based on the evaluation factors and sub-factors, to represent the lowest price technically acceptable proposal. While the Government will strive for maximum objectivity, the source selection process, by its nature, is subjective; therefore, professional judgment is implicit throughout the entire process. The Government intends to award one (1) contract and reserves the right to award without discussions.

B. The evaluation factors that establish the requirements of acceptability are set forth in this section. The technical factors will be rated on an acceptable/unacceptable basis. All offerors who pass the technical factors will be treated equally except for their prices. Award will be made on the basis of the lowest evaluated price of proposals meeting or exceeding the acceptability standards for non-cost factors. Award will be made to the technically acceptable offeror with the lowest price, which is deemed responsible in accordance with the FAR 9.1 and whose proposal conforms to the solicitation requirements.

C. Evaluation Process: The Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) source selection process will be used.

Offerors' technical proposal will be evaluated on an acceptable/unacceptable basis. If the lowest priced proposal was deemed technically acceptable, no other proposal will be evaluated. In addition, the Government will evaluate offers for award purposes by determining the Coefficient TEP for all CLINs together. By submission of its offer, the offeror accedes to all solicitation requirements, including terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements. Failure to meet a requirement may result in an offer being determined non-responsive and thereby excluded from further consideration.

D. Determination of Responsible Prospective Contractors: In order to be determined as responsible, an offeror must meet the following conditions:

• Offeror must meet the standards identified in FAR 9.104-1

• Offeror must provide evidence that it is able to obtain a minimum single project bonding capacity of 100% of full contract price and an aggregate bonding capacity of 100% of full contract price from an approved surety listed in the Department of the Treasury Circular 570 (http://www.fms.treas.gov/c570/) or other security permitted by FAR 28.2, unless prohibited by law or regulation

• Offeror must provide a letter of authorization permitting the Contracting Officer to verify offeror’s financial responsibility. Include name, address, and phone numbers for financial institution including a point of contact

Offerors who are determined to be non-responsible will be referred to the Small Business Administration (SBA) for a Certificate of Competency (COC). If a COC is denied by the SBA, the Government will resume technical evaluations as detailed in Step 3. Technical evaluations will continue until the Government identifies the Lowest Priced Technically Acceptable (LPTA) responsible offeror http://www.fms.treas.gov/c570/

E. Distribution. Distributed material will be identified as source selection sensitive and distribution will be strictly limited to appropriate personnel, and shall be encrypted where practicable. Should any offeror object to its proprietary information being shared between source selection evaluators and advisors via commercial email as described above, advise the Contracting Officer using the contact information above.

F. Solicitation Requirements, Terms and Conditions. Offerors are required to meet all solicitation requirements, such as terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements, in addition to those identified as factors or sub-factors. Failure to comply with the terms and conditions of the solicitation may result in the offeror being determined ineligible for award. Offerors must clearly identify any exception to the solicitation’s terms and conditions and must provide complete supporting rationale. The Government reserves the right to determine any such exceptions unacceptable.

Evaluation Factors

1. Factors and Subfactors. Proposals are evaluated on an “acceptable” or “unacceptable” basis. In order to be considered awardable, there must be an acceptable rating in every non-price factor/subfactor. Evaluation will be based upon the evaluation factors and subfactors described below:

(a) Factor I- Technical Sub-Factor 1: Organizational Experience Sub-Factor 2: Demonstration Project

(b) Factor II- Price

Both shall be determined acceptable by the Contracting Officer prior to any award made under this solicitation IAW the LPTA process.

FACTOR I- TECHNICAL. The Government technical evaluation team will evaluate the technical proposals on an acceptable/unacceptable basis. Failure to meet the specified requirements of the solicitation will result in an offer being considered “unacceptable”.

Table 1. Technical Acceptable/Unacceptable Rating Method Adjectival Rating Description Acceptable The proposal acceptably meets specified requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable The proposal does not meet specified requirements of the solicitation

The proposals will be evaluated against the following technical factor criteria:

Sub-Factor 1: Organizational Experience. An acceptable offer will provide evidence of a minimum of two (2) years job experience performing in the following areas:

(1) Mudding and taping drywall

(2) Exterior metal painting

(3) “Multispec” painting

Sub-Factor 2: Demonstration Project

The solution to the demonstration project is acceptable when it is complete and accurate in accordance with the MFPR IDIQ SOW. The following Task Order specific specifications IAW Bldg 30 and 120 Task Order, Floor Plan, and Sizing attachments found in Section J.

Standard: The solution is acceptable when the proposal adequately addresses the following:

• A cover page including the project title, total project cost, list of assumptions, list of requirements, performance period, material lead times, and any special considerations such as phasing of construction, which demonstrate an understanding of the project and how it should be accomplished.

• The written narrative describing the approach to the subject project which clearly demonstrates a thorough understanding of the construction effort and applicable codes and regulations associated with the Demonstration Project. The narrative will include all required elements of a proposal as identified in the MFPR IDIQ SOW.

• The schedule showing the offeror’s intended progression demonstrates a realistic timeframe, a reasonable breakout of the major work components (to include any permits required, etc.) and the associated completion percentage assigned for the Demonstration Project follows a logical progression of the work effort from task order award to completion.

• The Schedule of Material Submittals of all items that have a material effect on the Demonstration Project, demonstrating an understanding of the project’s requirements.

• The Project Cost Estimate demonstrates a reasonable and complete approach in construction methodology for line items, labor classifications, materials, quantities, and is consistent with the coefficient proposed. Calculations are correct calculations, and other documents necessary to support the design information required for the solution are included.

FACTOR II- COEFFICIENT (PRICE) PROPOSAL. Offerors whose price is determined to be unreasonable or unbalanced will not be considered for award.

(1) IAW AF Construction Guide 1 Oct 2019; 3.2.1.2 Coefficients. Coefficients are factors applied to the standard unit prices in the UPG to calculate the overall task order pricing. Awardees of contracts with coefficients, such as SABER contracts, have coefficients which increase or decrease the order costs for areas such as overhead, profit, minimum design costs, G&A expenses, bond premiums, and gross receipt taxes.

3.2.1.2.2. An offeror's proposed coefficients provide insight into their experience and knowledge of the local construction market. Typically, we expect proposed coefficients of less than 1 in a strong competitive market.

(2) For purposes of evaluation, the dollar value of $5M will be multiplied by the single weighted coefficient to determine the total evaluated price. The offeror’s price proposal will be evaluated by reviewing the proposed coefficients for each year/ordering period (base and two option periods). The offeror’s price proposal shall contain downward-sloping pricing for the total weighted average coefficient for each option period. Per the below example, the consolidated coefficient for each option period shall be lower than the base year and each proceeding option period.

(3) For proposal evaluation purposes, a single weighted coefficient will be developed for each offeror.

This single weighted coefficient will be based on the amount of work anticipated by each Coefficient listed in the Coefficient Schedule B, based on the below estimated percentages of work distribution. Each numbered coefficient from the Coefficient Schedule B will be multiplied by the percentage listed below for that coefficient and summed to a subtotal. The subtotal will be multiplied by the percentage of anticipated work for each installation. The base year and each option period will each have a weighted coefficient, which will then be summed and divided to result in the single weighted coefficient for evaluation purposes.

For purposes of evaluation, the contract ceiling value of $5M will be multiplied by a single weighted coefficient to determine the total evaluated price (TEP). See the below example for weighted evaluation of price proposal.

(4) Each offeror’s total evaluated price will be ranked from lowest to highest.

Standard Hours-Secured Area (Order $750,000 and Below) 43% Standard Hours-Secured Area (Order Above $750,000) 1% Standard Hours-Non-Secured Area (Order $750,000 and Below) 49% Standard Hours-Non-Secured Area (Order Above $750,000) 1% Non-Standard Hours-Secured Area (Order $750,000 and Below) 3% Non-Standard Hours-Secured Area (Order Above $750,000) 1% Non-Standard Hours-Non-Secured Area (Order $750,000 and Below) 1% Non-Standard Hours-Non-Secured Area (Order Above $750,000) 1% Total: 100%

The following is an EXMAPLE of the evaluation for the base period:

Schriever AFB (Base Year) Anticipated Proposed Weighted Work % Coeff. Coeff.

Standard Hours-Secured Area (Order $750,000 and Below) 43% 1.2700 .5461 Standard Hours-Secured Area (Order Above $750,000) 1% 1.2500 .0125 Standard Hours-Non-Secured Area (Order $750,000 and Below) 49% 1.1700 .5733 Standard Hours-Non-Secured Area (Order Above $750,000) 1% 1.1500 .0115 Non-Standard Hours-Secured Area (Order $750,000 and Below) 3% 1.3200 .0396 Non-Standard Hours-Secured Area (Order Above $750,000) 1% 1.3000 .0130 Non-Standard Hours-Non-Secured Area (Order $750,000 and Below) 1% 1.2200 .0122 Non-Standard Hours-Non-Secured Area (Order Above $750,000) 1% 1.2000 .0120

SUBTOTAL 100% 1.2202

Below is an example of downward sloping coefficients based on the calculated coefficient.

Base Period 1.2202 Option Period 1 1.2201 Option Period 2 1.2200

TOTAL 3.6603

Total (Base Year plus Option Period, used for proposal evaluation) 3.6603/3 Ordering Periods = 1.2201

1.2201 x $5,000,000.00 = $6,100,500.00 as the Total Evaluated Price (TEP)