5140-190P142.pdf
PDF 4 MB Posted
- Attached to
- Blue Ridge Parkway Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 693C73-22-B-000004
About this file
This solicitation is for the Blue Ridge Parkway Project NP-BLRI 2B13, 2H17, ETC, Solicitation Number 693C73-22-B-000004, issued by the Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration. The project consists of reconstructing and rehabilitating 75-100 miles of the Blue Ridge Parkway in North Carolina from Milepost 229.6 to 305.1, including overlooks, parking areas, ramps, drainage, signage, pavement markings, guardrail, and slope stabilization. Work will be split into multiple schedules with bidding closing dates to be specified. The project value is estimated between $75-100 million. Interested vendors must register at www.sam.gov to receive notifications and download solicitation documents. Annual Representations and Certifications must be completed at www.sam.gov and VETS-4212 at http://www.dol.gov/vets/vets4212.htm. Questions should be directed to eflhd.contracts@dot.gov.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 45
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5140-190P
COUNTY ROAD BRIDGE AT MP 288.82 INSPECTION DATE: 10/2/19
BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION
MAIN SPAN MATERIAL:
MAIN SPAN TYPE:
# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: ..
DECK TYPE:
WEARING SURFACE:
ABUT. FOUNDATIONS:
PIER FOUNDATION(S):
ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ...
PROJ./PLAN REF. NO:
NPS ROAD CLASS:
STRUCTURE HISTORY:
CONCRETE
FRAME
NOT APPLICABLE
BITUMINOUS
UNKNOWN
N/A
CONCRETE
000000000000 /
1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD
NO. OF MAIN SPANS:
NO. OF APPR. SPANS:
STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: ..
MAX. SPAN LENGTH:
DECK WIDTH:
CURB TO CURB WIDTH:
YEAR BUILT:
YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: ..
SKEW ANGLE:
FRACTURE CRITICAL:
12.0 FT (3.7 M)
12.0 FT (3.7 M)
36.6 FT (11.2 M)
24.6 FT (7.5 M)
1950 (EST.)
N/A
0 °
NO
LOCATION
BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY MILE POINT: ..................... 288.82 (KM PT 464.93)
STATE: ................................. NORTH CAROLINA LOCATION: 2.9 MILES TO YADKIN RIVER
FACILITY CARRIED: ............ BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY
FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. COUNTY ROAD
STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY
This concrete frame bridge is in good condition overall with only minor problems. These problems include exposed rebar due to insufficient concrete cover on the abutment breastwalls; and deterioration of the mortar joint along the interface between the wingwalls and abutment breastwalls.
Since the previous inspection, the tree limbs obstructing the vertical clearance sign at the east underpass approach have been trimmed; a “ONE LANE BRIDGE” sign has been installed at the east underpass approach; and the roadway and approaches have been resurfaced and restriped. It should also be noted that the reflective object markers do not properly define the roadway limits.
Corrective action should be taken as outlined in this report to prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future. Consideration should be given to installing a railing system capable of meeting current safety and height guidelines for traffic barriers.
INSPECTION TEAM: S. DOSSETT, T. POWELL (VOLKERT, INC.)
CONDITION ASSESSMENT:
STEPHEN DOSSETT, P.E., FIELD TEAM LEADER
REPORT REVIEW:
MARCUS MILLER, P.E., BRIDGE INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252
REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 1/7/20
JORGOMAI CEESAY, PH.D., P.E., BIP SUPERVISORY ENGINEER 703-404-6244
RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5140-190P
A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.
B (Major) - Structure exhibits severe deterioration, presents a safety hazard, or is designated a high priority due to age and/or condition.
C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.
D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.
E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.
D226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT
ITEM
NO.
ROUTINE MAINTENANCE QTY. UNIT UNIT
COST
PRELIM.
COST
ESTIMATE
60.1 CLEAN AND SEAL EXPOSED REBAR ON ABUTMENT BREASTWALLS WITH
APPROVED PROTECTIVE COATING.
60.6 REPAIR MORTAR JOINT ALONG INTERFACE BETWEEN WINGWALLS AND
ABUTMENT BREASTWALLS.
222.7 REPOSITION REFLECTIVE OBJECT MARKERS TO DEFINE ROADWAY LIMITS.
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :
ITEM
NO.
REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION
(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)
QTY. UNIT
UNIT
COST
PRELIM. COST
ESTIMATES
REHAB. RECONSTR.
PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* :
(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)
REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5140-190P
G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)
CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS
SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.
Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.
CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.
“IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or sec ion loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action may return structure to light service.
FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.
CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223
NOT APPLICABLE
EXCELLENT CONDITION
VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.
GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.
SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.
FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.
POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.
N
58. DECK ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
OTHER
ALIGNMENT
DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION
FASCIA(E)
DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING
TRUSSES
FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS
ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)
GIRDERS OR BEAMS
BEARING DEVICES
59. SUPERSTRUCTURE
OTHER
DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION
UTILITIES
DRAINS AND DRAINAGE
PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS
CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN
RIDEABILITY
WEARING SURFACE
EXPANSION JOINTS
DECK SLAB
ABUTMENTS
60. SUBSTRUCTURE
1.
10.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
9.
8.
7.
6.
5.
4.
3.
2.
1.
PAINT
11.
N N G N N N N G G
N G
G G N G G N
N
N
G
G
58.1, 59.3 MINOR CRACKING AND SPALLING OF DECK SLAB UNDERSIDE.
58.3, 222.4 ROADWAY AND APPROACHES HAVE BEEN RESURFACED AND
RESTRIPED SINCE PREVIOUS INSPECTION.
59.8 MINOR EFFLORESCENCE ON RING STONES.
60.1 MINOR SPALLING WITH EXPOSED REBAR DUE TO INSUFFICIENT
CONCRETE COVER ON ABUTMENT BREASTWALLS. MINOR RUSTING
OF PREVIOUSLY COATED REBAR. MINOR VEHICLE SCRAPES ON
ABUTMENT BREASTWALLS. MINOR CRACKING OF ABUTMENT
BREASTWALLS THROUGHOUT. MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING WITH
WATER STAINING DUE TO LEAKAGE ON SOUTH ABUTMENT
BREASTWALL NEAR ROADWAY CENTERLINE.
60.6 MODERATE DETERIORATION OF WINGWALL MORTAR JOINTS WITH
EFFLORESCENCE AT JUNCTION WITH ABUTMENTS; MINOR
ELSEWHERE.
60.6,12 MINOR MOSS GROWTH ON WINGWALLS. MINOR VEGETATION
GROWTH ALONG WINGWALLS.
60.7 WEEP HOLES APPEAR TO BE FUNCTIONING AS DESIGNED.
1. BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS F
2. PILE BENTS N
3. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS N
4. BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS N
5. FOUNDATIONS N
6. WINGWALLS G
7. WEEP HOLES G
8. EXPANSION JOINTS N
9. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR G
10. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION G
11. SLOPE PROTECTION N
12. OTHER (VEGETATION) G
PIER(S)
13. WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS N
14. PILE BENTS N
15. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS N
16. FOUNDATIONS N
17. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR N
18. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION N
19. OTHER N
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5140-190P
ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
STREAM BED COMPOSITION :9.
AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING 8.
NORMAL VELOCITY 7.
ADEQUACY OF OPENING 6.
OTHER5.
WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS 4.
CHANNEL PROTECTION 3.
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 2.
ALIGNMENT 1.
61. CHANNEL N
222. APPROACHES 7
1. APPROACH SLABS
2. RELIEF JOINTS
3. APPROACH GUARDRAIL
4. SURFACING
5. EROSION
6. SETTLEMENT
7. SIGNS
8. ALIGNMENT
9. OTHER (UNDERPASS ROADWAY)
N N G G G G F G P
223. RETAINING WALL N
1. WALL
2. WEEP HOLES
3. FOUNDATION
4. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR
5. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION
6. OTHER
36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES
A. BRIDGE RAILINGS
B. TRANSITIONS
C. APPROACH GUARDRAILS
D. APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS
222.7 11'-3" VERTICAL CLEARANCE AND "ONE LANE ROAD" SIGNS AT BOTH
UNDERPASS APPROACHES. REFLECTIVE OBJECT MARKERS AT ALL
FOUR UNDERPASS CORNERS; MINOR DAMAGE TO NORTHWEST
MARKER; MARKERS DO NOT PROPERLY DEFINE ROADWAY LIMITS.
"ONE LANE ROAD" SIGN HAS BEEN INSTALLED AND TREE LIMBS
OBSCURING VERTICAL CLEARANCE SIGN HAVE BEEN TRIMMED AT
EAST UNDERPASS APPROACH SINCE PREVIOUS INSPECTION.
222.9 MODERATE TO SEVERE DETERIORATION OF UNDERPASS ROADWAY
SURFACING RESULTING IN EXPOSURE OF UNDERLYING CONCRETE
SLAB AT WEST SIDE; CONCRETE SLAB EXHIBITS MODERATE TO
SEVERE ABRASION. MODERATE SOIL AND DEBRIS ACCUMULATION
ALONG UNDERPASS ROADWAY CURBLINES.
36.A,C,D RAILING DOES NOT MEET CURRENT MINIMUM HEIGHT GUIDELINES
FOR TRAFFIC BARRIERS. RAILING END TREATMENTS DO NOT MEET
CURRENT SAFETY GUIDELINES FOR TRAFFIC BARRIERS.
TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES
N
Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.
Meets currently acceptable standards.
Not applicable or a safety feature is not required.
STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5140-190P
TRUCK TYPE
INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)
TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS
H 15 14 25 23
HS 27 24 45 41
TYPE 3 25 23 42 38
TYPE 3S2 40 36 67 61
TYPE 3-3 49 45 82 75
DESIGN LOADING: UNKNOWN (H15 ASSUMED - SEE REMARKS)
X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD
CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED
DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION:
LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY:
REMARKS: DESIGN LOADING IS UNKNOWN; ASSUMPTION IS BASED ON STRUCTURE TYPE, LOCATION, AGE AND
CONDITION.
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5140-190P
STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION
(201) PARK: BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY
(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... COUNTY ROAD BRIDGE AT MP 288.82
(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............1 - BRIDGE
(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 5140-190P
(205) NPS REGION: .................... 4 - SOUTHEAST
(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 1
(207) ROAD SECTION NO: ..........190P
(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD
(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: .......YES
(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. PARK
(211) PROJECT NO(S):
(212) DRAWING NUMBERS:
(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
(1) STATE:
(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:
(3) COUNTY CODE:
(4) CITY/PLACE CODE:
(5) INVENTORY ROUTE:
(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:
(7) FACILITY CARRIED:
(8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:
(9) LOCATION:
(10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: ..
(11) MILE POINT:
(27) YEAR BUILT:
(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:
(20) TOLL:
(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: ..
374 - NORTH CAROLINA (NC)
189 - WATAUGA
161000010
COUNTY ROAD
BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY
5140190P0000000
2.9 MILES TO YADKIN RIVER
99.99 FT (99.99 M)
288.82 (KM PT 464.93)
N/A
3 - FREE ROAD
5 - NOT ELIGIBLE
STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE
(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..
(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:
(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:
(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:
(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:
(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:
(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:
(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..
(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...
(107) DECK TYPE:
1 - CONCRETE
07 - FRAME
12.0 FT (3.7 M)
12.0 FT (3.7 M)
0 - UNKNOWN
0 - UNKNOWN
6 - N/A
6 - N/A
N - NOT APPLICABLE
(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER
(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER
(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0
(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:
A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. 6 - BITUMINOUS
B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. 0 - NONE
C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. 0 - NONE
(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... NO
LOAD RATING AND POSTING
(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 0 - UNKNOWN (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... A - OPEN, NO RESTRICTION
(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 27.0 TONS (24.5 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED
(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 45.1 TONS (40.9 METRIC TONS)
INSPECTION DATES
(90) INSPECTION DATE: 10/19 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 48 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):
(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO
INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE
(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO
(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :
(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO
INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5140-190P
GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA
(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 36°09'01.90"
(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 81°37'28.10"
(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 15 MI (24 KM)
(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:
(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 01
(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 1 - HIGHWAY
(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 1 - HIGHWAY
(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC:
(30) YEAR OF ADT:
(114) FUTURE ADT:
(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:
(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE
(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... N
(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT:
LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:
(55) RIGHT: ....................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:
(52) DECK WIDTH:
(32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:
(213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:
LEFT SHOULDER:
RIGHT SHOULDER:
(33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:
(34) SKEW ANGLE:
(35) DECK FLARE?:
(47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:
(50) SIDEWALKS:
LEFT :
RIGHT :
(214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:
RAIL CONFIGURATION:
MATERIAL:
DESIGN TYPE:
(215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:
(53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK:
(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE:
24.6 FT (7.5 M)
36.6 FT (11.2 M)
27.0 FT (8.2 M)
21.0 FT (6.4 M)
3.0 FT (0.9 M)
3.0 FT (0.9 M)
0 - NO MEDIAN
0 °
NO
24.6 FT (7.5 M)
0.0 FT (0.0 M)
0.0 FT (0.0 M)
1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPE
8 - TIMBER/OTHER
3 - SIMPLE RAIL (joints at each
1.83 FT (0.56 M)
99.99 FT (99.99 M)
11.25 FT (3.43 M)
CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST
(58) DECK:
(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:
(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:
(61) CHANNEL: .......................... N
(62) CULVERT: ...........................N
(222) APPROACHES:
(223) RETAINING WALL: ........... N
(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 0000
(75A) TYPE OF WORK:
(75B) WORK DONE BY:
(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..
(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:
(68) DECK GEOMETRY:
(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:
(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:
(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:
(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:
(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:
(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:
(227) MAINTENANCE COST:
(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...
(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:
N
N - Not over waterway.
1 - MAINTENANCE
D - MINOR
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:
(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:
(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:
https://81�37'28.10 https://36�09'01.90
PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 5140-190P
PHOTO #1 - LOOKING NORTH TOWARD CUMBERLAND KNOB
PHOTO #2 - EAST SIDE; NOTE OBJECT MARKERS DO NOT PROPERLY
DEFINE BRIDGE LIMITS
PHOTO #3 - GENERAL TOP SIDE VIEW LOOKING SOUTH
PHOTO #4 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW LOOKING WEST
PHOTO #5 - GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH APPROACH; NOTE
APPROACHES HAVE BEEN RESURFACED AND RESTRIPED SINCE
PREVIOUS INSPECTION
PHOTO #6 - GENERAL VIEW OF RAILING END TREATMENT,
NORTHWEST END TREATMENT SHOWN
PHOTO #7 - SIGNAGE AT WEST UNDERPASS APPROACH
PHOTO #8 - VERTICAL CLEARANCE SIGN AT WEST UNDERPASS
APPROACH
PHOTO #9 - VERTICAL CLEARANCE SIGN AT EAST UNDERPASS
APPROACH; PREVIOUSLY NOTED TREE LIMBS OBSTRUCTING SIGN
HAVE BEEN TRIMMED
PHOTO #10 - SIGNAGE AT EAST UNDERPASS APPROACH
PHOTO #11 - GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH
ABUTMENT; NOTE TYPICAL SPALLING WITH
EXPOSED REBAR DUE TO INSUFFICIENT
CONCRETE COVER
PHOTO #12 - DETERIORATION OF MORTAR
JOINT ALONG INTERFACE BETWEEN
WINGWALLS AND ABUTMENT BREASTWALLS,
SOUTHEAST CORNER SHOWN
PHOTO #13 - TYPICAL SPALLING WITH
EXPOSED REBAR ON ABUTMENT
BREASTWALLS, SOUTH ABUTMENT
BREASTWALL NEAR EAST SIDE SHOWN
PHOTO #14 - TYPICAL VERTICAL CRACKING OF
ABUTMENT BREASTWALLS, SOUTH ABUTMENT
BREASTWALL NEAR ROADWAY CENTERLINE
SHOWN; NOTE WATER STAINING DUE TO
LEAKAGE
PHOTO #15 - TYPICAL EFFLORESCENCE ON RINGSTONES, WEST
RINGSTONES SHOWN
PHOTO #16 - TYPICAL SOIL AND DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ALONG
UNDERPASS ROADWAY CURBLINES, SOUTH CURBLINE SHOWN
PHOTO #17 - CRACKING AND DETERIORATION OF WEST UNDERPASS
APPROACH PAVEMENT
PHOTO #18 - DETERIORATION OF WEARING SURFACE OVER
CONCRETE SLAB BENEATH BRIDGE
PHOTO #19 - TYPICAL ABRASION OF EXPOSED CONCRETE SLAB AT
WEST SIDE
PHOTO #20 - MAP CRACKING AND DETERIORATION OF EAST
UNDERPASS APPROACH PAVEMENT
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .