5140-172P6375.pdf
PDF 4 MB Posted
- Attached to
- Blue Ridge Parkway Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 693C73-22-B-000004
About this file
This solicitation is for the reconstruction and rehabilitation of the Blue Ridge Parkway in North Carolina from Milepost 229.6 to MP 305.1. Work includes drainage assessments and improvements, signage, pavement markings, guardrail, and slope stabilization. The project will be split into multiple schedules with a total estimated cost between $75-100 million. Sealed bids are due on a date specified in Block 13a of the SF1442 solicitation form. Interested vendors must register at www.sam.gov to receive notifications and bid documents. Annual representations and certifications must also be completed at www.sam.gov and http://www.dol.gov/vets/vets4212.htm. Questions should be sent to eflhd.contracts@dot.gov. Bidders must have a valid SAM registration for payment. 'Other than small business' contractors must submit a subcontracting plan. Security screening is required to access government buildings for bid openings.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 45
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT
U.S. ROUTE 321 ACCESS RAMP BRIDGE
ACCESS RAMP TO U.S. ROUTE 321 (NBL) OVER MIDDLE FORK NEW RIVER
BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY
Report prepared by:
Federal Highway Administration
FLH Office of Bridges and Structures 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, VA 20166 703-404-6201 https:/ /bridge. fl hd. fhwa. dot. gov
STRUCTURE NO. 5140-172P
INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE
INSPECTION DATE: 6/25/19
MILE POINT: 291.80
KILOMETER POINT: 469.59
STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5140-172P
U.S. ROUTE 321 ACCESS RAMP BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 6/25/19
BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION
MAIN SPAN MATERIAL: ....... CONCRETE
MAIN SPAN TYPE: ............... ARCH - DECK
# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .. 1
DECK TYPE: ......................... NOT APPLICABLE
WEARING SURFACE: .......... NOT APPLICABLE
ABUT. FOUNDATIONS: ........ SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L
PIER FOUNDATION(S): ........ N/A
ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ... CONCRETE
PROJ./PLAN REF. NO: ......... 000000000000 / 00000
NPS ROAD CLASS: .............. 2 - CONNECTOR ROAD
STRUCTURE HISTORY: ...... 2002-WEARING SURFACE REPLACED.
LOCATION
NO. OF MAIN SPANS:
NO. OF APPR. SPANS:
STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: ..
MAX. SPAN LENGTH:
DECK WIDTH:
CURB TO CURB WIDTH:
YEAR BUILT:
YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: ..
SKEW ANGLE:
FRACTURE CRITICAL:
20.0 FT (6.1 M)
20.0 FT (6.1 M)
34.3 FT (10.5 M)
30.3 FT (9.2 M)
5 °
NO
BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY MILE POINT: ..................... 291.80 (KM PT 469.59)
STATE: ................................. NORTH CAROLINA LOCATION: ACCESS RAMP TO U.S. ROUTE 321
(NORTH) FACILITY CARRIED: ............ ACCESS RAMP TO U.S. ROUTE 321 (NBL)
FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. MIDDLE FORK NEW RIVER
STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY
This concrete arch bridge is in fair condition overall. Problems include moderate to severe deterioration of the masonry mortar joints, a void on the east side of the south abutment breastwall, and scour along south abutment
Corrective measures should be taken as outlined in this report to help prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.
INSPECTION TEAM: R. SILVESTRY, E. JOHNSON
CONDITION ASSESSMENT:
REINALDO SILVESTRY, P.E., FIELD TEAM LEADER 703-404-6251
REPORT REVIEW:
MARCUS MILLER, P.E., BRIDGE INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252
REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 12/10/19
JORGOMAI CEESAY, PH.D., P.E., BIP SUPERVISORY ENGINEER 703-404-6244
RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5140-172P
A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.
B (Major) - Structure exhibits severe deterioration, presents a safety hazard, or is designated a high priority due to age and/or condition.
C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.
D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.
E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.
D226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT
ITEM
NO.
ROUTINE MAINTENANCE QTY. UNIT UNIT
COST
PRELIM.
COST
ESTIMATE
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :
ITEM
NO.
REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION
(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)
QTY. UNIT
UNIT
COST
PRELIM. COST
ESTIMATES
REHAB. RECONSTR.
60.9 PLACE SCOUR COUNTERMEASURES ALONG SOUTH ABUTMENT.
58.6, 60.6 REPOINT DETERIORATED STONE MASONRY JOINTS.
60.1 FILL CONCRETE VOID ON EAST SIDE OF SOUTH ABUTMENT
BREASTWALL.
CONTRACT COSTS FOR MOBILIZATION, TRAFFIC CONTROL,
DESIGN, AND CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING (APPROXIMATELY
70% OF TOTAL REHAB COST) PLUS PARK LOCATION FACTOR.
PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* :
(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)
REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5140-172P
CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223
N NOT APPLICABLE 3 SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.
9 EXCELLENT CONDITION Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.
8 VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted. 2 CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present
7 GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems. or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.
6 SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration. 1 “IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or sec ion loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal 5 FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour. corrective action may return structure to light service.
4 POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour. 0 FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.
CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS
G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)
58. DECK N ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
N1. DECK SLAB
N2. EXPANSION JOINTS
G3. WEARING SURFACE
G4. RIDEABILITY
N5. CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN
F6. PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS
G7. DRAINS AND DRAINAGE
N8. UTILITIES
N9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION
N10. OTHER (STRIPING)
59. SUPERSTRUCTURE 6
N1. BEARING DEVICES
N2. GIRDERS OR BEAMS
F3. ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)
N4. FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS
N5. TRUSSES
N6. DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING
N7. PAINT
G8. FASCIA(E)
G9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION
G10. ALIGNMENT
N11. OTHER
60. SUBSTRUCTURE 6
58.6 MODERATE DETERIORATION OF PARAPET MORTAR JOINTS WITH
EFFLORESCENCE AND VEGETATION GROWTH.
59.3,8 MODERATE TO SEVERE EFFLORESCENCE WITH WATER LEAKAGE
ON STONE MASONRY FASCIA STONES. MINOR CRACKING WITH
EFFLORESCENCE ON STONE FASCIAE AND CONCRETE ARCH,
MAINLY NEAR FASCIAE. MINOR SPALLING AT CONSTRUCTION
JOINTS. SEVERAL SMALL PIECES OF TIMBER EMBEDDED IN
CONCRETE. SEE 60.1.
60.1 MINOR SPALLING AND CRACKING OF ABUTMENTS WITH
EFFLORESCENCE. CRACKING ALONG SPRINGLINE AT BOTH
ABUTMENTS. 1" WIDE X 24" LONG X 12" DEEP VOID IN CONCRETE
AT SOUTH ABUTMENT SPRINGLINE, EAST SIDE, WITH EXPOSED
REBAR DUE TO POOR CONSOLIDATION DURING CONSTRUCTION.
HEAVY SCALING OF BREASTWALLS AT WATERLINE. SEVERAL
AREAS WITH EMBEDDED TIMBER.
60.6 MODERATE TO SEVERE CRACKING AND DETERIORATION OF
WINGWALL MORTAR JOINTS WITH EFFLORESCENCE AND
VEGETATION GROWTH IN JOINTS. MINOR WASHOUT OF WINGWALL
EDGE JOINT MORTAR AT WATERLINE.
60.7 MINOR LOSS OF FILL MATERIAL THROUGH WEEP HOLES WITH
HEAVY ABRASION OF CONCRETE BELOW OPENINGS.
60.9, 61.2 ROCKS ARE PRESENT AT ABUTMENT CORNERS. MINOR TO
MODERATE SCOUR AT UPSTREAM SIDE OF BOTH ABUTMENTS; NO
UNDERMINING NOTED.
ABUTMENTS
1. BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS F
2. PILE BENTS N
3. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS N
4. BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS N
5. FOUNDATIONS N
6. WINGWALLS F
7. WEEP HOLES G
8. EXPANSION JOINTS N
9. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR F
10. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION G
11. SLOPE PROTECTION N
12. OTHER N
PIER(S)
13. WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS N
14. PILE BENTS N
15. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS N
16. FOUNDATIONS N
17. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR N
18. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION N
19. OTHER N
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5140-172P
ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
STREAM BED COMPOSITION :9.
AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING 8.
NORMAL VELOCITY 7.
ADEQUACY OF OPENING 6.
OTHER5.
WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS 4.
CHANNEL PROTECTION 3.
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 2.
ALIGNMENT 1.
61. CHANNEL 7
G G G G N
MED
SUFF
15 FT.
SAND, STONES
222. APPROACHES 7
1. APPROACH SLABS
2. RELIEF JOINTS
3. APPROACH GUARDRAIL
4. SURFACING
5. EROSION
6. SETTLEMENT
7. SIGNS
8. ALIGNMENT
9. OTHER
N N G G G G N G N
223. RETAINING WALL N
1. WALL
2. WEEP HOLES
3. FOUNDATION
4. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR
5. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION
6. OTHER
36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES
A. BRIDGE RAILINGS
B. TRANSITIONS
C. APPROACH GUARDRAILS
D. APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS
61.2 SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR SCOUR EVALUATION.
222.3, 36.B APPROACH GUARDRAIL AT WEST SIDE OF SOUTH APPROACH ONLY;
RAILING IS NOT ATTACHED TO WINGWALL END.
36.A,C PARAPET HEIGHT OF 1'-6" ON WEST SIDE DOES NOT MEET AASHTO
MINIMUM HEIGHT SPECIFICATION OF 2'-3".
TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES
N
Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.
Meets currently acceptable standards.
Not applicable or a safety feature is not required.
STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5140-172P
TRUCK TYPE
INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)
TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS
H 15 14 25 23
HS 27 24 45 41
TYPE 3 21 19 36 33
TYPE 3S2 34 31 57 52
TYPE 3-3 42 38 70 64
DESIGN LOADING: UNKNOWN (H15 ASSUMED - SEE REMARKS)
X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD
CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED
DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION: 3/16
LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY:
REMARKS: RATING IS BASED ON ENGINEERING JUDGEMENT, AS PER AASHTO MANUAL FOR BRIDGE EVALUATION
(MBE).
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5140-172P
STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION
(201) PARK: BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY
(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... U.S. ROUTE 321 ACCESS RAMP BRIDGE
(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............1 - BRIDGE
(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 5140-172P
(205) NPS REGION: .................... 4 - SOUTHEAST
(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 120
(207) ROAD SECTION NO: ..........172P
(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 2 - CONNECTOR ROAD
(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: .......YES
(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. GILLESPE
(211) PROJECT NO(S):
(212) DRAWING NUMBERS:
(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
(1) STATE:
(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:
(3) COUNTY CODE:
(4) CITY/PLACE CODE:
(5) INVENTORY ROUTE:
(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:
(7) FACILITY CARRIED:
(8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:
(9) LOCATION:
(10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: ..
(11) MILE POINT:
(27) YEAR BUILT:
(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:
(20) TOLL:
(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: ..
374 - NORTH CAROLINA (NC)
189 - WATAUGA
161000010
MIDDLE FORK NEW RIVER
ACCESS RAMP TO U.S. ROU
5140172P0000000
ACCESS RAMP TO U.S. ROU
99.99 FT (99.99 M)
291.80 (KM PT 469.59)
3 - FREE ROAD
5 - NOT ELIGIBLE
STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE
(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..
(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:
(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:
(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:
(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:
(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:
(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:
(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..
(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...
(107) DECK TYPE:
1 - CONCRETE
11 - ARCH - DECK
20.0 FT (6.1 M)
20.0 FT (6.1 M)
2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L
2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L
6 - N/A
6 - N/A
N - NOT APPLICABLE
(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER
(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER
(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0
(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:
A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. N - NOT APPLICABLE
B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. 0 - NONE
C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. 0 - NONE
(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... NO
LOAD RATING AND POSTING
(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 0 - UNKNOWN (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... A - OPEN, NO RESTRICTION
(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 27.0 TONS (24.5 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED
(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 45.0 TONS (40.8 METRIC TONS)
INSPECTION DATES
(90) INSPECTION DATE: 6/19 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 48 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):
(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO
INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE
(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO
(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :
(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO
INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5140-172P
GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA
(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 36°08'54.30"
(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 81°39'40.50"
(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 1 MI (2 KM)
(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:
(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 00
(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 1 - HIGHWAY
(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 5 - WATERWAY
(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC:
(30) YEAR OF ADT:
(114) FUTURE ADT:
(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:
(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE
(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... 0
(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT:
LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:
(55) RIGHT: ....................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:
(52) DECK WIDTH:
(32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:
(213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:
LEFT SHOULDER:
RIGHT SHOULDER:
(33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:
(34) SKEW ANGLE:
(35) DECK FLARE?:
(47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:
(50) SIDEWALKS:
LEFT :
RIGHT :
(214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:
RAIL CONFIGURATION:
MATERIAL:
DESIGN TYPE:
(215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:
(53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK:
(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE:
30.3 FT (9.2 M)
34.3 FT (10.5 M)
30.0 FT (9.1 M)
22.0 FT (6.7 M)
4.0 FT (1.2 M)
4.0 FT (1.2 M)
0 - NO MEDIAN
5 °
YES
34.3 FT (10.5 M)
0.0 FT (0.0 M)
0.0 FT (0.0 M)
3 - PARAPET ONLY
9 - OTHER
1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL
1.50 FT (0.46 M)
99.99 FT (99.99 M)
0.00 FT (0.00 M)
CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST
(58) DECK: ................................. N
(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:
(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:
(61) CHANNEL:
(62) CULVERT: ...........................N
(222) APPROACHES:
(223) RETAINING WALL: ........... N
(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 0011
(75A) TYPE OF WORK:
(75B) WORK DONE BY:
(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..
(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:
(68) DECK GEOMETRY:
(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:
(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:
(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:
(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:
(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:
(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:
(227) MAINTENANCE COST:
(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...
(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:
N
5 - Stable; scour within limits of
2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION
D - MINOR
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:
2002-WEARING SURFACE REPLACED.
(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:
(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:
https://81�39'40.50 https://36�08'54.30
APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 5140-172P
PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 5140-172P
PHOTO #1 - LOOKING NORTH TOWARD BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY
FLOW
PHOTO #2 - WEST (DOWNSTREAM) SIDE
PHOTO #3 - GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW LOOKING NORTH
PHOTO #4 - DISPLACED CAPSTONE AT SOUTHEAST END HAS BEEN
RESET SINCE LAST INSPECTION
PHOTO #5 - DETERIORATION OF MASONRY MORTAR JOINTS AT
SOUTHEAST CORNER
PHOTO #6 - SOUTHEAST WINGWALL; NOTE DETERIORATION WITH
EFFLORESCENCE OF MORTAR JOINTS
PHOTO #7 - DETERIORATION OF MASONRY MORTAR JOINTS AT
SOUTHWEST CORNER
PHOTO #8 - GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH ABUTMENT
PHOTO #9 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW
LOOKING EAST
PHOTO #10 - EFFLORESCENCE OF
RINGSTONES AND LONGITUDINAL CRACKING
AT EAST END OF ARCH UNDERSIDE
PHOTO #11 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW
LOOKING WEST
PHOTO #12 - EFFLORESCENCE FROM
RINGSTONES AT WEST SIDE
PHOTO #13 - NORTH ABUTMENT
PHOTO #14 - EFFLORESCENCE FROM
RINGSTONES AT NORTHWEST CORNER OF
UNDERSIDE OF ARCH
PHOTO #15 - NORTHEAST WINGWALL
PHOTO #16 - NORTHWEST WINGWALL; NOTE
VEGETATION GROWTH ADJACENT TO
STRUCTURE
PHOTO #17 - SCOUR HOLE AT UPSTREAM SIDE
OF SOUTH END
PHOTO #18 - DETERIORATION OF MORTAR
JOINTS AT NORTHEAST SIDE
PHOTO #19 - DETERIORATION OF MORTAR JOINTS AT NORTHEAST
SIDE
PHOTO #20 - LOOKING UPSTREAM
PHOTO #21 - LOOKING DOWNSTREAM
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .