36C25519R0017-004.pdf
PDF 4 MB Posted
- Attached to
- Correct workplace & Life Safety Issues, abate asbestos and improve wayfinding Project NO : 657-18-110
- Solicitation number
- 36C25519R0017
About this file
36C25519R0017 Abatement Inspection Report 2of3.pdf
View the file
Other files
Show all 40
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
www.amienvironmental.com
8802 South 135th Street, Suite 100 Omaha, NE 68138
800.828.8487 402.397.5001 402.397.3313 (fax)
Mold/Water Damage Photo Log
Mold & Water Damage Photo Log
Correct Workplace Life Safety Issues & Abate Asbestos Mold & Water Damage Photo Log John Cochran, Buildings 1 & 7, VASTLHCS Rev May 21, 2018 AMI Job No.: 17-00330 Page 1
Building 1
PHOTO 01 Viewing water damage and visible mold on concrete deck in Room A029.
PHOTO 02 Viewing water damage and visible mold on concrete deck and pipe insulation in Room
A029. HM#: NA HM#: NA
PHOTO 03 Viewing water staining and visible mold on concrete deck in Room A029.
PHOTO 04 Viewing visible mold on pipe insulation and surrounding surfaces in Room A029. HM#: NA HM#: NA
800.828.8487 402.397.5001 402.397.3313 (fax)
APPENDIX C
Schematics
Asbestos Material Locations
Lead-Based Paint Locations
Asbestos Material Locations
En vi ro nm en ta l A
M I
A
K
EY
M M
-0 2:
A
SB
ES
TO
S- C
O N
TA
IN
IN
G
, N O
N -F
R
IA
B
LE
, C A
TE
G
O R
Y Il, D O
O R
C A
U
LK
, G R
A Y
A
SB
ES
TO
S- C
O N
TA
IN
IN
G
T H
ER
M
A L
SY
ST
EM
IN
SU
LA
TI
O
N (T
SI
-0
1) S
U
SP
EC
TE
D
IN
W A
LL
S
A N
D C
H A
SE
S
N O
TE
ro nm en ta l A
M I
C B
K
EY
TS
I-0
1:
A
SB
ES
TO
S-
C O
N
TA
IN
IN
G , F
R
IA
B
LE
, T H
ER
M
A L
SY
ST
EM
IN
SU
LA
TI
O
N O
N P
IP
E
FI
TT
IN
G
S ro nm en ta l A
M I
A
8C
A
SB
ES
TO
S- C
O N
TA
IN
IN
G
T H
ER
M
A L
SY
ST
EM
IN
SU
LA
TI
O
N (T
SI
-0
1) S
U
SP
EC
TE
D A
B O
VE
R
IG
ID
C
EI
LI
N
G S
A N
D
IN
W A
LL
S
A N
D C
H A
SE
S
N O ro nm en ta l A
M I
A
K
EY
M M
-0 9:
A
SB
ES
TO
S- C
O N
TA
IN
IN
G
, N O
N -F
R
IA
B
LE
, C A
TE
G
O R
Y l, VI
N
YL
FL
O O
R T
IL
E, 2" x1 2"
, W H
IT
E
W
IT
H B
LA
C
K S
TR
EA
K S;
A N
D M
A
ST
IC
A
SB
ES
TO
S- C
O N
TA
IN
IN
G
T H
ER
M
A L
SY
ST
EM
IN
SU
LA
TI
O
N (T
SI
-0
1) S
U
SP
EC
TE
D A
B O
VE
R
IG
ID
C
EI
LI
N
G S
A N
D
IN
W A
LL
S
A N
D C
H A
SE
S
N O ro nm en ta l A
M I
A
K
EY
M M
-1 3:
A
SB
ES
TO
S- C
O N
TA
IN
IN
G
, N O
N -F
R
IA
B
LE
, C A
TE
G
O R
Y l, VI
N
YL
F
LO
O
R T
IL
E, "x
T A
N W
IT
H
B R
O W
N S
TR
EA
K S, A N
D N
O N
A
SB
ES
TO
S- C
O N
TA
IN
IN
G
M A
ST
IC
A
SB
ES
TO
S- C
O N
TA
IN
IN
G
T H
ER
M
A L
SY
ST
EM
IN
SU
LA
TI
O
N (T
SI
-0
1) S
U
SP
EC
TE
D
IN
W A
LL
S
A N
D C
H A
SE
S
N O
TE
M M
-1 4:
A
SB
ES
TO
S- C
O N
TA
IN
IN
G
, N O
N -F
R
IA
B
LE
, C A
TE
G
O R
Y Il, M A
ST
IC
O N
FI
B
ER
G
LA
SS
D U
C T
IN
SU
LA
TI
O N
, B
LA
C K
TS
I-0
1:
A
SB
ES
TO
S-
C O
N
TA
IN
IN
G , F
R
IA
B
LE
, T H
ER
M
A L
SY
ST
EM
IN
SU
LA
TI
O
N O
N P
IP
E
FI
TT
IN
ro nm en ta l A
M I
6t h
FL
O
O R
E N
D O
S C
O P
Y (A bo ve
C ei lin g)
A
SB
ES
TO
S- C
O N
TA
IN
IN
G
T H
ER
M
A L
SY
ST
EM
IN
SU
LA
TI
O
N (T
SI
-0
1) S
U
SP
EC
TE
D A
B O
VE
R
IG
ID
C
EI
LI
N
G S
A N
D
IN
W A
LL
S
A N
D C
H A
SE
S
N O ro nm en ta l A
M I
8A
N O
A S
B E
S
TO
S -C
O N
TA
IN
IN
G
M A
TE
R
IA
LS
ID
E
N
TI
FI
E
D
Lead-Based Paint Locations ro nm en ta l A
M I
C B
N O
L E
A D
-B A
S E
D P
A
IN
T
ID
E N
TI
FI
ro nm en ta l A
M I
A
8C
N O
L E
A D
-B A
S E
D P
A
IN
T
ID
E N
TI
FI
ro nm en ta l A
M I
A
K
EY
LP
-1
0:
L
EA
D
-B A
SE
D
P A
IN
T, T A
N , O
N D
O O
R F
R A
M
ES
ro nm en ta l A
M I
6t h
FL
O
O R
E N
D O
S C
O P
Y (A bo ve
C ei lin g)
N O
L E
A D
-B A
S E
D P
A
IN
T
ID
E N
TI
FI
K
EY
LP
-1
5:
L
EA
D
-B A
SE
D
P A
IN
T, G R
EE
N
En vi ro nm en ta l A
M I
8A
800.828.8487 402.397.5001 402.397.3313 (fax)
APPENDIX D
Analytical Results
Asbestos Lab Report
Lead Paint Lab Report
Asbestos Lab Report
Lead Paint Lab Report
ConcentrationAnalyzed RDL LeadClient SampleDescription Collected
Test Report: Lead in Paint Chips by Flame AAS (SW 846 3050B/7000B)*
EMSL Analytical, Inc.
200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 Phone/Fax: (856) 303-2500 / (856) 786-5974 http://www.EMSL.com cinnaminsonleadlab@emsl.com
Attn: Mike Taylor AMI Group, Inc.
8802 South 135th Street Suite 100 Omaha, NE 68138-6511
Received: 03/29/18 10:05 AM
17-00330 John Cochran, VA St. Louis, MO
Fax: (402) 397-3313 Phone: (402) 397-5001
Project:
3/26/2018Collected:
201803222 CustomerID: AMI50 CustomerPO: 17-00330 ProjectID:
EMSL Order:
Site: Interior A029 Wall / Beige / Green Paint
1.1 % wt3/29/2018
201803222-0001 0.0403/26/201801L % wt
Site: Interior A029 Wall / White / Green Paint
0.19 % wt3/29/2018
201803222-0002 0.00803/26/201802L % wt
Site: Interior A029 Door Frame / White / Green Paint <0.0080 % wt3/29/2018
201803222-0003 0.00803/26/201803L % wt
Site: Interior CB03 Walls & Ceiling / White Paint
0.13 % wt3/29/2018
201803222-0004 0.00803/26/201804L % wt
Site: Interior CB03 Ducts / White Paint
0.062 % wt3/29/2018
201803222-0005 0.00803/26/201805L % wt
Site: Interior CB03 Door & Frame / Tan Paint <0.026 % wt3/29/2018
201803222-0006 0.0263/26/201806L % wt
Site: Interior A218C Upper Walls & Ceiling / Tan Paint <0.0080 % wt3/29/2018
201803222-0007 0.00803/26/201807L % wt
Site: Interior A412 Walls / Blue Paint <0.0080 % wt3/29/2018
201803222-0008 0.00803/26/201808L % wt
Site: Interior A412 Ceiling / White Paint <0.0080 % wt3/29/2018
201803222-0009 0.00803/26/201809L % wt
Site: Interior A412 Window & Door Frame / Tan Paint
1.6 % wt3/29/2018
201803222-0010 0.0803/26/201810L % wt
Site: Interior A412 Bathroom Walls & Ceiling / Tan Paint
0.073 % wt3/29/2018
201803222-0011 0.00803/26/201811L % wt
Page 1 of 2Test Report PB w/RDL-7.32.3 Printed: 4/2/2018 3:16:07 PM
Phillip Worby, Lead Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory
*Analysis following Lead in Paint by EMSL SOP/Determination of Environmental Lead by FLAA. Reporting limit is 0.008 % wt based on the minimum sample weight per our SOP. Unless noted, results in this report are not blank corrected. This report relates only to the samples reported above and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. "<" (less than) result signifies that the analyte was not detected at or above the reporting limit. Measurement of uncertainty is available upon request. The QC data associated with the sample results included in this report meet the recovery and precision requirements unless specifically indicated otherwise.
Definitions of modifications are available upon request.
Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Cinnaminson, NJ NELAP Certifications: NJ 03036, NY 10872, PA 68-00367, AIHA-LAP, LLC ELLAP 100194, A2LA 2845.01
Report Amended: 04/02/2018 15:16:07 Replaces the Inital Report 03/30/2018 10:33:38. Reason Code: Client-Change to Sample ID
ConcentrationAnalyzed RDL LeadClient SampleDescription Collected
Test Report: Lead in Paint Chips by Flame AAS (SW 846 3050B/7000B)*
EMSL Analytical, Inc.
200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 Phone/Fax: (856) 303-2500 / (856) 786-5974 http://www.EMSL.com cinnaminsonleadlab@emsl.com
Attn: Mike Taylor AMI Group, Inc.
8802 South 135th Street Suite 100 Omaha, NE 68138-6511
Received: 03/29/18 10:05 AM
17-00330 John Cochran, VA St. Louis, MO
Fax: (402) 397-3313 Phone: (402) 397-5001
Project:
3/26/2018Collected:
201803222 CustomerID: AMI50 CustomerPO: 17-00330 ProjectID:
EMSL Order:
Site: Interior A901 Walls / White Paint
0.077 % wt3/29/2018
201803222-0012 0.00803/26/201812L % wt
Site: Interior A901 Patches on Wall / Tan Paint
0.11 % wt3/29/2018
201803222-0013 0.00803/26/201813L % wt
Site: Interior A901 Door & Frame / Brown Paint <0.012 % wt3/29/2018
201803222-0014 0.0123/26/201814L % wt
Site: Interior B718 Walls, Ceiling, Door / Green Paint
2.0 % wt3/29/2018
201803222-0015 0.103/26/201815L % wt
Page 2 of 2Test Report PB w/RDL-7.32.3 Printed: 4/2/2018 3:16:07 PM
Phillip Worby, Lead Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory
*Analysis following Lead in Paint by EMSL SOP/Determination of Environmental Lead by FLAA. Reporting limit is 0.008 % wt based on the minimum sample weight per our SOP. Unless noted, results in this report are not blank corrected. This report relates only to the samples reported above and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. "<" (less than) result signifies that the analyte was not detected at or above the reporting limit. Measurement of uncertainty is available upon request. The QC data associated with the sample results included in this report meet the recovery and precision requirements unless specifically indicated otherwise.
Definitions of modifications are available upon request.
Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Cinnaminson, NJ NELAP Certifications: NJ 03036, NY 10872, PA 68-00367, AIHA-LAP, LLC ELLAP 100194, A2LA 2845.01
Report Amended: 04/02/2018 15:16:07 Replaces the Inital Report 03/30/2018 10:33:38. Reason Code: Client-Change to Sample ID
800.828.8487 402.397.5001 402.397.3313 (fax)
APPENDIX E
Inspector’s Credentials
HAZARDOUS BUILDING MATERIALS
INSPECTION REPORT
Correct Workplace & Life Safety Issues, Abate Asbestos, and Improve Way Finding
Project No. 657-18-110
Jefferson Barrack Division Buildings 1 & 52
Veterans Affairs Saint Louis Health Care System St. Louis, Missouri
Rev. May 21, 2018
Prepared for:
Veterans Affairs Saint Louis Health Care System c/o Calvin L. Hinz Architects, PC
3705 North 200th Street Elkhorn, NE 68022
Prepared by:
AMI Environmental
8802 South 135th Street, Suite 100 Omaha, Nebraska 68138
AMIE # 17-00330
AMIE Project No. 17-00330 Hazardous Building Materials Inspection Report Rev. May 21, 2018 Page i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. SURVEY OVERVIEW
1.1. Purpose and Scope
1.1.1. Inspection Area
1.1.2. Limitations
1.2. Regulatory Reference
2. BUILDING INFORMATION
2.1. General Construction
2.2. Pre-Existing Information
3. INSPECTION METHODOLOGIES
3.1. Asbestos Inspection
3.1.1. Key Definitions
3.1.2. Homogenous Material Numbering Convention
3.1.3. Bulk Sampling
3.2. Lead-Based Paint Inspection
3.2.1. Key Definitions
3.2.2. Homogenous Paint Applications Numbering Convention
3.2.3. Paint Chip Sampling
3.3. Mold Inspection
4. SUMMARY OF INSPECTION FINDINGS
4.1. Asbestos Inspection Findings
4.1.1. Building 1
4.1.2. Building 52
4.2. Lead-Based Paint Inspection Findings
4.2.1. Building 1
4.2.2. Building 52
4.3. Visible Mold
4.3.1. Building 1
4.3.2. Building 52
Rev. May 21, 2018 Page ii
5. RISKS AND HAZARDS
5.1. Asbestos
5.2. Lead-Based Paint
5.3. Mold
6. RECOMMENDATIONS
6.1. General Recommendations
6.1.1. Asbestos
6.1.2. Lead-Based Paint
6.1.3. Mold
6.2. Hazardous Conditions Recommendations
6.3. Point Count Analysis / TEM Chatfield Analysis Recommendations
7. REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS
7.1. Asbestos-Containing Materials
7.1.1. Notification Requirements
7.1.2. Asbestos Removal Requirements
7.1.3. OSHA Regulation of <1 Percent Asbestos
7.1.4. State of Missouri Asbestos Removal Regulations
7.2. Lead-Based Paint
7.2.1. Disposal Requirements
7.2.2. Construction Requirements
7.3. Mold
APPENDIX A: Tables
APPENDIX B: Photo Logs
APPENDIX C: Schematics
APPENDIX D: Analytical Results
APPENDIX E: Inspectors’ Credentials
May 21, 2018 Page 1
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS INSPECTION REPORT
Correct Workplace Life Safety Issues, Abate Asbestos and Improve Wayfinding
Jefferson Barracks Division Buildings 1 and 52
Veteran’s Affairs St. Louis Health Care Services St. Louis, Missouri
Rev. May 21, 2018
1. SURVEY OVERVIEW
On March 20th and 21st, 2018, selected areas of Buildings 1 and 52, located on the Jefferson Barracks Division campus of Veterans Affairs Saint Louis Health Care Services (VASTLHCS), in St. Louis, Missouri, were inspected for asbestos-containing material (ACM), lead-based paint (LBP), and visual evidence of mold growth by a representative of AMI Environmental (AMIE). The hazardous building materials inspection was conducted in preparation for renovation and/or repair of the space(s). The renovation and repair project is hereinafter referred to as “The Project”. The inspection was initiated at the request of Mr. Alan Tast, AIA, LEED, AP of Calvin L. Hinz Architects, PC, on behalf of
VASTLHCS.
The inspection was performed by Mr. Thomas Manion of AMIE in accordance with an approved Sampling Plan, regulatory requirements, and generally accepted industry methods. Copies of applicable requisite training certificates for Mr. Manion are provided in Appendix E.
Mr. Manion returned to the site on May 10th to confirm site conditions and perform limited supplemental sampling requested by VASTLHCS.
1.1. Purpose and Scope
The purpose and scope of the inspection was to identify and sample as needed suspect ACMs and LBPs present in defined project areas that may be impacted by The Project, and to report visually observable mold growth.
1.1.1. Inspection Area
The hazardous building materials inspection included all accessible interior areas of the rooms and spaces identified in Attachment B of the project documents. The defined areas for The Project are hereinafter referred to collectively as the Inspection Area.
1.1.2. Limitations
At the discretion of the inspector(s), certain spaces may not have been inspected and/or samples not collected from materials that were not accessible at the time of the inspection.
Examples of suspect materials that may not have been accessible include those which may exist inside finished interior walls and ceilings, and/or materials in areas not accessible due to locked doors, physical barriers, and/or safety, security, and related concerns. Materials requiring specialized equipment to access (e.g. lifts) are also considered not accessible unless prior arrangements were made. These materials, if present, should be identified at the time of renovation or demolition. Sampling of these materials may not be necessary if, Correct Workplace Life Safety Issues and Abate Asbestos Jefferson Barracks, Buildings 1 and 52, VASTLHCS, St. Louis, MO
Rev. May 21, 2018 Page 2 in the case of suspect ACM, the materials are assumed to be ACM or if they are determined by a licensed asbestos inspector to be homogenous to other materials that were sampled.
The following limitations were encountered during the inspection:
Concealed spaces inside finished walls and above hard ceilings.
Room GC13 was locked and not accessible.
These limitations are not believed to have a material effect on the findings of the inspection.
1.2. Regulatory Reference
The asbestos inspection was conducted in accordance with USEPA National Emission Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) regulations (ref.: 40 CFR, Part 61), following criteria established for identifying asbestos-containing building materials that may be impacted by planned renovation activities; applicable protocols established by the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) (ref.: 40 CFR 763). While the State of Missouri requires state licensure for asbestos inspectors in accordance with Department of Natural Resources, 10 CSR 10-6.240, inspection and sampling protocols follow those of EPA AHERA. There is also no licensing requirement for lead paint sampling in non-HUD facilities.
2. BUILDING INFORMATION
2.1. General Construction
Building 1 is multi-story building originally constructed in the 1920’s. While there have been numerous modifications, such as architectural finishes and mechanical systems upgrades, a significant portion of the building’s original plaster wall and ceiling system and plumbing systems remain.
Building 52 is a multi-story with similar construction features.
2.2. Pre-Existing Information
Previous asbestos inspections have been conducted in the project areas, most recently in 2008 by Finback 670 of Baltimore, MD, and Altec Environmental Consultants of Shreveport, LA. Applicable findings from the 2008 report are incorporated and cross-referenced herein.
3. INSPECTION METHODOLOGIES
3.1. Asbestos Inspection
The asbestos inspection included review of previous inspection and sampling information, visual identification of suspect materials, and bulk sampling of suspect materials. The inspection and sampling were conducted in accordance with the approved Asbestos and Lead-based Paint Limited Sampling Plan, by AMI Environmental, revised March 23, 2018; and the USEPA National Emission Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) regulations (ref.: 40 CFR, Part 61), following criteria established for identifying asbestos-containing building materials that may be impacted by planned renovation. Additional aspects of the inspection methodology are discussed below.
3.1.1. Key Definitions
3.1.1.1. Homogenous Material
Homogenous materials are unique applications of building materials uniform in color and texture. The homogeneity of a material can be further defined by area(s) of
Rev. May 21, 2018 Page 3 application. Bulk sampling is conducted to determine the asbestos content of a homogenous material.
3.1.1.2. Asbestos-Containing Material (ACM)
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) define ACMs as any material that contains greater than one percent asbestos, as determined by visual area estimation (microscopic analysis). The State of Kansas follows the EPA standard. Some materials contain one percent or less asbestos. While these materials are not ACMs by definition, they are still regulated by OSHA, but to a lesser degree.
3.1.1.3. Friable/Non-Friable ACM
Friable ACMs are materials that contain more than one percent asbestos and, when dry, can be crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by hand pressure, thereby releasing fibers into the air more readily. In contrast, non-friable ACMs are ACMs that, when dry, cannot be crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by hand pressure. Non-friable ACMs are grouped into two categories: Category I and Category
II.
3.1.1.4. Regulated Asbestos-Containing Materials (RACM)
Regulated Asbestos-Containing Materials (RACM) include friable ACMs and non-friable ACMs that, depending on their category, have become friable, have been subjected to specific forms of impact damage, have a high probability of becoming friable, and/or may become friable during removal.
3.1.2. Homogenous Material Numbering Convention
All suspect asbestos materials are assigned a unique homogeneous material number (HM#). The HM# begins with two or three letters, denoting the type of material, followed by a sequential number that is assigned to every material identified within each material type (example: ABC-01). The HM# is referenced throughout the report to uniquely identify each material. AHERA identifies three basic material types: Surfacing Materials (SM), which include spray and trowel applied materials, such as fireproofing, ceiling texture, plaster, etc.; Thermal System Insulation (TSI), which includes insulating materials applied to mechanical and plumbing components for temperature preservation and condensation prevention purposes; and Miscellaneous Materials (MM), which includes all other materials, such as floor coverings and mastics, roofing materials, asbestos cement products, and many others. When a homogenous material has multiple layers, individual layers are identified with a suffix, e.g. MM-03A, MM-03B, etc. A key defining acronyms is provided on the table(s).
3.1.3. Bulk Sampling
Bulk sampling must be performed to determine whether a certain homogenous material contains asbestos. Asbestos bulk sampling for the inspection was conducted in accordance with protocols established by the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) (ref.: 40 CFR 763). All suspect homogenous materials and associated sampling of these materials are identified in Table 1 – Asbestos Material Sampling Table. Suspect materials not sampled are assumed to be ACM until properly sampled and determined otherwise.
Some suspect materials, such as lab table tops, roofing systems, TSI, etc., may not be
Rev. May 21, 2018 Page 4 sampled to preclude damage. Friability of the suspect asbestos-containing materials was determined by touching and/or sampling of the material.
3.1.3.1. Bulk Sample Numbering Convention
Each bulk sample is given a unique sequence number when collected, which is associated with the respective homogenous material in Table 1 – Asbestos Material Sampling Table. When sampling information from previous surveys are incorporated into the same report, all or part of the original sample numbers will be referenced as needed to distinguish them uniquely. In this report, sample numbers from the 2008 report are recognizable by their length, six digits and longer, and because they are hyphenated. In addition, 2008 sample numbers are preceded with “previously sampled” designation of “PS#” in the Sample Number column of the asbestos table.
It should be noted that only samples from the 2008 report that have negative results are used in this report. Materials identified as ACM in the 2008 report that are applicable to The Project are included in this report and cross-referenced by their 2008 HMA number, which is preceded with the notation “Ref.:” in the asbestos table.
3.1.3.2. Polarized Light Microscopy Analysis (PLM)
Bulk samples collected during the inspection were submitted to an EPA accredited laboratory, EMSL Analytical, Inc. (EMSL), located at 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, New Jersey. EMSL was instructed to perform Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) analysis, utilizing dispersion staining techniques (ref: EPA Method 600/M4-82-020). PLM analysis is the least expensive and most commonly used visual estimate method. While PLM analysis is acceptable to EPA, OSHA, and most states for determining asbestos content, some states now require more sophisticated methods when analyzing certain types of materials.
A total of 33 homogenous materials were identified by the inspection, including seven materials that had previously been identified, sampled, and reported in the 2008 report.
A total of 39 asbestos bulk samples were collected and submitted for laboratory analysis from 27 homogenous materials sample during the asbestos inspection. PLM Analysis was performed on a total of 46 heterogeneous applications identified in the 27 homogenous materials. Heterogeneous applications are individual layers of different materials contained within a single bulk sample, each of which must be analyzed individually to determine its asbestos content (e.g. vinyl floor tiles and mastic; cove base and mastic; etc.).
Some samples and/or heterogeneous applications may not have been analyzed by the lab if a positive result was obtained from a sample that is among a group of samples representing a suspect material. This process, known as “stop on first positive,” is followed because if a single sample is found to be positive, that material is determined to be ACM, thus making it unnecessary to analyze any additional samples in the sampling group.
Please refer to the Table 1 – Asbestos Material Sampling Table in Appendix A for a complete listing of all materials sampled. The laboratory analytical reports may be found in Appendix D.
3.1.3.3. Quantification Method Analysis
EPA regulations allow materials determined to contain less than 10 percent asbestos utilizing a visual estimate quantification method, such as PLM analysis, to be treated
Rev. May 21, 2018 Page 5 as non-asbestos containing if the material is re-analyzed using one of two quantification methods and determined to contain one percent or less of asbestos. The two acceptable quantification methods are point count analysis and TEM Chatfield analysis.
Quantification methods are more time-consuming and more expensive analytical procedures that are occasionally used to more accurately determine the amount of asbestos in certain samples. Because of their higher cost and the acceptable accuracy of the less expensive visual estimation method, laboratories do not typically perform quantification analyses unless specifically requested.
The quantification method known as point count analysis is used for most ACM types, except floor tile. The organic matrix composition of floor tile precludes the use of point count analysis to more accurately determine asbestos amounts within a sample.
Therefore, TEM Chatfield analysis—which effectively removes all organic materials, leaving only asbestos behind—is necessary to provide a more precise percentage of asbestos content in floor tile.
Please refer to section 6.0 Recommendations, for recommendations concerning supplemental analysis.
3.2. Lead-Based Paint Inspection
The LBP inspection included visual identification of homogenous paint applications and bulk (chip) sampling of the paint(s). While the U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) promulgates guidelines for LBP inspections in child occupied facilities, there are no formal guidelines for non-HUD regulated inspections. Thus, the LBP inspection was conducted in accordance with generally accepted industry standards and practices. Additional aspects of the inspection methodology are discussed below.
3.2.1. Key Definitions
3.2.1.1. Homogenous Paint Applications
Homogenous paint applications are significant paint applications that are visually distinct by their color and uniformity. Significant paint applications do not include incidental occurrences of paint such as isolated occurrences of accent trim, artistic paints, etc. While visual inspection alone cannot generally identify sub-layers of paint, these applications are often identified during the chip sampling process.
3.2.1.2. Lead-Based Paint (LBP)
Pursuant to Federal Register, Vol. 61, No. 169, LBP is defined as paint or other surface coatings containing more than 0.5 percent lead by weight.
3.2.2. Homogenous Paint Applications Numbering Convention
Homogenous paints and coatings are assigned a unique homogeneous material number (HM#). For paints, the HM# begins with “LP”, followed by a sequential number that is assigned to every paint identified (e.g. LP-01). The HM# is referenced throughout the report to uniquely identify each paint application.
3.2.3. Paint Chip Sampling
A total of 17 paint chips were collected from 17 significant and visually distinct paint applications identified during the lead paint inspection. The samples were submitted to
Rev. May 21, 2018 Page 6
EMSL for laboratory analysis, utilizing Flame Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry (SW 846 3050B/7000B). EMSL’s NLLAP (National Lead Laboratory Accreditation Program) and AIHA ELLAP (Environmental Lead Laboratory Accreditation Program) accreditation number is 100194.
Please refer to Table 2 – Lead Paint Sampling Table in Appendix A for a complete listing of the paint applications identified and sampled for lead. The laboratory’s analytical reports are provided in Appendix D.
3.3. Mold Inspection
A non-intrusive visual inspection of the Inspection Area was performed to identify the presence of visible mold growth. No bulk testing or testing for airborne mold was to be conducted. Findings are indicative of conditions at the time of the inspection only.
4. SUMMARY OF INSPECTION FINDINGS
Key findings of the hazardous building materials inspection are summarized below. Please refer to the Appendices for complete details of the inspection findings and supporting documentation.
4.1. Asbestos Inspection Findings
Below is a by room summary of the key findings of the asbestos inspection:
4.1.1. Building 1
Room GC13:
ACM pipe insulation and fittings were identified in the room; approx. 414 ln. ft.
and 70 mudded fittings. Additional quantities are suspected in walls and chases.
ACM floor tile, 9”x9”, with black mastic was identified in the room; approx. 480
sq. ft.
Room GC14: Room was locked and not accessible.
Room GC15:
ACM pipe insulation and fittings were identified in the room; approx. 40 ln. ft. and
15 mudded fittings. Additional quantities are suspected in walls and chases.
ACM floor tile, 9”x9”, with black mastic was identified in the room; approx. 209
sq. ft.
Room GC17C:
ACM pipe insulation and fittings were identified in the room; approx. 333 ln. ft.
and 102 mudded fittings. Additional quantities are suspected in walls and chases.
ACM floor tile, 9”x9”, with black mastic was identified in the room; approx. 504
sq. ft.
Room GE09:
ACM floor tile, 9”x9”, with black mastic was identified in the room; approx. 646
sq. ft.
Room GE09A:
ACM floor tile, 9”x9”, with black mastic was identified in the room; approx. 624
sq. ft.
Rev. May 21, 2018 Page 7
Room 3C14:
ACM pipe insulation and fittings are present in the room; approx. 27 ln. ft. of insulation and 6 mudded fittings. Additional quantities of TSI are suspected in above rigid ceilings and in walls and chases.
ACM floor tile, 9”x9”, with black mastic was identified in the room; approx. 20
sq. ft.
2nd Floor, East Wing, South:
Four (4) ACM mudded pipe fittings were identified in Room 2E11. In addition, an estimated 650 ln. ft. of ACM pipe insulation and approximately 130 ACM pipe fittings is present above rigid ceilings throughout the space. An additional 460 ln.
ft. and 90 fittings are suspected in walls and chases.
Non-ACM floor tile, 12”x12”, with ACM black mastic was identified in many of the patient care rooms; approx. 1,937 sq. ft.
ACM sheet flooring with ACM yellow adhesive was identified in Room 2E01;
approx. 40 sq. ft.
ACM sink undercoating, white, was identified on the underside of the sink in Rooms 2E05B and 2E13; 2 ea.
4.1.2. Building 52
Room GN30:
ACM Transite pegboard was identified in the room; approx. 525 sq. ft.
ACM floor tile, 9”x9”, with black mastic was identified in the room; approx. 280
sq. ft.
ACM Transite veneer lab counter top, green, was identified in the room; approx.
74 sq. ft.
Room GN31:
ACM floor tile, 9”x9”, with black mastic was identified in the room; approx. 480
sq. ft.
ACM Transite lab counter top, black, was identified in the room; approx. 114 sq.
ft.
Room GS08:
ACM pipe insulation and fittings were identified in the room; approx. 180 ln ft.
and 80 mudded fittings. Additional quantities are suspected in walls and chases.
Room GS08A:
ACM pipe insulation and fittings were identified in the room; approx. 110 ln ft.
and 70 mudded fittings. Additional quantities are suspected in walls and chases.
4.2. Lead-Based Paint Inspection Findings
Below is a by room summary of the key findings of the LBP inspection:
4.2.1. Building 1
Room GC13: Tan LBP was identified on the concrete decking in the room.
Room GC11: Was locked and not accessible.
Room GC15: No LBP identified.
Rev. May 21, 2018 Page 8
Room GC17C: No LBP identified.
Rooms GE09 & GE09A: No LBP identified.
Room 3C14: No LBP identified.
2nd Floor, East Wing, South: No LBP identified.
4.2.2. Building 52
Room GN30: No LBP identified.
Room GN31: No LBP identified.
Rooms GS08 & GS08A:
Black LBP was identified on the guard rail around the pit.
Gray LBP was identified on the metal doors and door frame.
4.3. Visible Mold
Below is a by room summary of the key findings of the visual mold inspection:
4.3.1. Building 1
Room GC13: No mold observed.
Room GC11: No mold observed.
Room GC15: No mold observed.
Room GC17C: No mold observed.
Rooms GE09 & GE09A: No mold observed, however water damage was observed below exterior windows in multiple locations.
Room 3C14: No mold observed.
2nd Floor, East Wing, South: No mold observed.
4.3.2. Building 52
Room GN30: No mold observed.
Room GN31: No mold observed.
Rooms GS08 & GS08A: No mold observed.
5. RISKS AND HAZARDS
5.1. Asbestos
To be a significant health concern, asbestos fibers must be inhaled. When asbestos fibers are inhaled, they become lodged in the lung tissue or alveoli. Here they clog and scar the tissues, causing the walls of the alveoli to lose their elasticity and useful function in respiration. Asbestosis (scarring of the lung), lung cancer, and Mesothelioma (cancer of the lining of the chest or lining of the abdominal wall) are diseases associated with asbestos exposure. Risks and hazards increase with increased exposure. ACM condition, proximity to building occupants, building use, and other factors can influence the potential for asbestos fibers to become airborne, and therefore increase exposure risks.
Rev. May 21, 2018 Page 9
5.2. Lead-Based Paint
Inhalation and ingestion are the major routes of lead exposure. Once in the body, lead is distributed via the bloodstream to red blood cells, soft-tissue and bone. The kidneys and gastrointestinal (GI) tract eliminate lead in the body very slowly, while minute amounts are lost through perspiration.
Lead in the body can cause serious damage to the central and peripheral nervous system, the cardiovascular system, and the kidneys. Exposure to high concentrations of lead can cause retardation, convulsions, coma, and sometimes death. Children are especially vulnerable and susceptible to lead poisoning. Even low levels of exposure persisting during childhood are known to slow a child’s normal development and cause learning and behavioral problems. Exposure to lead can result from deteriorating surfaces and activities mechanically impacting lead surfaces. Preventing exposure requires proper work practices, monitoring, disposal and personal protective equipment during demolition, alteration and friction producing activities.
5.3. Mold
Molds have the potential to cause health problems in some individuals. Molds produce allergens (substances that can cause allergic reactions), irritants, and in some cases, potentially toxic substances (mycotoxins). Inhaling or touching mold or mold spores may cause allergic reactions in sensitive individuals. Allergic responses include hay fever-type symptoms, such as sneezing, runny nose, red eyes, and skin rash (dermatitis). Allergic reactions to mold are common and can be immediate or delayed. Molds can also cause asthma attacks in people with asthma who are allergic to mold.
6. RECOMMENDATIONS
The purpose of this section is to interpret survey findings and provide preliminary recommendations that may be relevant and appropriate at this time. Because this document is a presentation of investigative findings, recommendations related to future construction activities are inherently general in nature. More specific determinations concerning hazardous building materials to be impacted by construction should be made during the abatement project design process.
6.1. General Recommendations
6.1.1. Asbestos
State and/or federal regulations require that ACMs be removed prior to demolition or renovation activities that will impact the ACMs. Depending on the specific renovation work to be performed, certain ACMs may not require removal if they will not be disturbed and do not pose a risk to building occupants or construction trade workers. However, to ensure worker safety and to eliminate future asbestos-related maintenance and management costs and risks, AMIE recommends removal of all identified ACMs in the areas to be renovated. While partial abatement may be technically possible, it is often impractical and not cost-effective.
ACMs not impacted by renovation or demolition activities should be inspected annually and maintained in good condition. ACMs deemed to be in less than good condition (damaged or significantly damaged) should be repaired or removed and replaced. Such repairs should be performed by qualified persons and in accordance with regulatory guidelines.
Rev. May 21, 2018 Page 10
6.1.2. Lead-Based Paint
Facility owners are ultimately liable for their lead-containing hazardous waste from cradle to grave. EPA regulations provide two ways to determine whether a waste stream, such as demolition debris containing LBP, must be classified as hazardous waste. Waste generators can either test the waste using an approved testing method (Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure [TCLP]), or they can apply knowledge of the hazardous characteristic of the waste.
Based on the initial lead paint testing results, AMIE recommends TCLP testing be conducted on the existing building materials, painted and unpainted, prior to the start of renovation or demolition activity. In addition, trade contractors who work in the facility should also be notified of the presence of lead so that they can appropriately monitor and protect their workers against lead exposure.
Flaking and peeling LBP on surfaces to remain should be scraped and stabilized by lead trained personnel wearing appropriate PPE in accordance with OSHA requirements, prior to applications of new paints. Engineering controls and appropriate work practices should be used to prevent the spread of lead contamination to adjacent areas.
Any lead-based painted building components not removed during renovation should be considered for inclusion in a facility management plan that maintains potential exposure below OSHA action levels and ensures the material will be handled properly and in accordance with applicable regulations.
6.1.3. Mold
Insulation and porous materials with visible mold should be removed and disposed of. The concrete ceiling and other cleanable surfaces should be cleaned of all visible mold and the application of a fungicide and/or mold resistant paint is recommend. All mold remediation work should be performed using generally accepted industry work practices and engineering controls appropriate for minor mold remediation. The moisture problem causing the mold growth must be corrected to prevent reoccurrence.
6.2. Hazardous Conditions Recommendations
Potentially hazardous conditions were observed in the building and are described below. The conditions described are not intended to be a complete assessment of potential hazards. Additional hazards may be present.
Minor ACM appearing debris was observed in Room 3C14, a utility closet. The debris should be cleaned up or access restricted to the room.
6.3. Point Count Analysis / TEM Chatfield Analysis Recommendations No point count or TEM Chatfield analysis is recommended at this time.
7. REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS
7.1. Asbestos-Containing Materials
The removal and disposal of ACMs is regulated at the federal, state, and, sometimes, local level. While some states have developed their own regulatory standards for the various asbestos disciplines, many states have adopted the federal standards but have established licensing requirements and enforcement authority at the state level.
Rev. May 21, 2018 Page 11
7.1.1. Notification Requirements
EPA’s NESHAP regulation, 40 CFR, Subpart M, 61.145, Standard for Demolition and Renovation, stipulates that an owner of a facility submit proper notification with either the EPA’s regional office and/or the state and local regulatory agency of intention to demolish or renovate. Notifications must be received by the appropriate regulatory agencies 10 working days prior to commencement of asbestos stripping or removal, or other site work.
If the demolition or renovation date changes, or the scope of work is increased by more than 20 percent, another notification must be made.
7.1.2. Asbestos Removal Requirements
Asbestos removal must be performed by a licensed abatement contractor. The contractor should follow all work practices, worker protection, and disposal requirements set forth in the contract specifications and by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) and the EPA. Key federal regulations concerning asbestos include 29 CFR 1910.1001, 29 CFR 1926.1101, 40 CFR Part 61, Subpart M, and 40 CFR 763.
7.1.3. OSHA Regulation of <1 Percent Asbestos
While EPA and many states do not regulate materials containing less than one percent asbestos, OSHA regulates materials containing any amount of asbestos. (Ref. OSHA Construction Industry Standard, 29 CFR 1926.1101(a)(3))
7.1.4. State of Missouri Asbestos Removal Regulations
The State of Missouri regulates asbestos removal through the Department of Natural Resources, under 10 CSR 10-6.240. For a complete understanding of Missouri’s regulations governing asbestos projects, please refer to:
https://dnr.mo.gov/env/apcp/asbestos/index.htm
7.2. Lead-Based Paint
7.2.1. Disposal Requirements
The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) classifies lead-containing waste streams as hazardous materials if TCLP levels exceed five parts per million. If TCLP leachable lead levels exceed that threshold, EPA regulations (40 CFR 261) require the waste stream to be handled and disposed of as a hazardous waste. Waste streams containing less the five parts per million of leachable lead are classified as non-hazardous waste and can be disposed of in a construction and demolition landfill.
7.2.2. Construction Requirements
OSHA’s 29 CFR 1926.62 regulates worker exposure to lead during construction activities that include demolition or salvage of structures where lead or materials containing lead are present, as well as removal or encapsulation of lead-containing materials. The standard establishes maximum limits of exposure to lead, including a permissible exposure limit and action level, and should be adhered to during construction and demolition activities.
Rev. May 21, 2018 Page 12
7.3. Mold
While there are no formal federal or State of Missouri regulations or licensing requirements for mold remediation, generally accepted industry practices and prudent safeguards should be employed by qualified persons for mold cleanup and removal operations.
800.828.8487 402.397.5001 402.397.3313 (fax)
APPENDIX A
Tables
Table 1 – Asbestos Material Sampling Table
Table 2 – Lead Paint Sampling Table
Table 1 – Asbestos Material Sampling Table
T ab le
A sb es to s M at er ia l S am pl in g
T le
N A
- N ot
A va ila bl e F
Fr ia bl e
N F
N on
-F ria bl e
SM
S ur fa ci ng M at er ia l
TS
I –
T he rm al
S ys te m
In su la tio n M
M
M isc el la ne ou s M at er ia l
N D
N on -D et ec t N
S
No t S am pl ed
SF
P
St op o n
Fi rs t P os iti ve
(N ot
A na ly ze d)
PS
P re vi ou sly S am
PA
C
M
P re su m ed a sb es to s c on ta in in g m at er ia l.
AC
M s & P
AC
M s i de nt ifi ed in b ol d sh ad in g.
H o.
R el at o es cr ip tio n ol or
Ph ot o er ia l L oc at io n Sa m pl e yp e
F
F on d
E st
Q ty om m en t
C or re ct
W or kp la ce L ife S af et y Is su es a nd
A ba te A sb es to s le
A sb es to s M at er ia ls S am pl in g
T
Je ff er so n B ar ra ck s, B ui ld in gs
2, V
A
ST
L H
C S, S t.
L ou is , M
O ev
. M ay
1, A
M I P ro je ct
-0
Pa ge
B U
IL
D
IN
oo m G m n ot a cc es si bl e.
m G
SI
-0
Pi pe in su la tio n an d fit tin gs
W hi te hr ou gh ou t r m dd iti on al
T
SI
m ay b e co nc ea le d in w al ls a nd c ha se s.
R ef
H
M A
-1
F G oo d
L F
M
F *R ef er th e r ep or t f ad di tio na l i nf or m at io n.
-0
V yl fl oo r til e, 9” x9 w ith ac k m as tic ar us br ow ns a nd gr ay ou gh ou t t he r ef
H M
A -0
N
F Si am ag ed
*R r ep or tio na l i nf or m at
SM
-0
Pl te r s ys te
/g ra y al ls th ro ug ho ut a re a
-1
1E
-3
2W
-2
3E
-2
4C V
-1 m G
-0 in su la tio n an d fit ou gh ou t r iti on al
T
SI
m ay b e co nc ea le d in w al ls a nd c ha se s.
R ef
H
M A
-1
F G oo d
L
F
M F
*R ef r ep or tio na l i nf or m at
-0 yl fl oo r k m ns ou gh ou t r
H M
A -0
N
F G oo d r ep or tio na l i nf or m at
-0
M M
2A yl w al l b as e, B ro w io us lo ca ns ro ug ho ut le
A sb es to s M at er ia l S am pl in g
T
- N ot
A va ila bl e F
Fr ia bl e
N F
N on
-F ria bl e
SM
S ur fa ci ng M at er ia l
TS
I –
T he rm al
S ys te m
In su la tio n M
M
M isc el la ne ou s M at er ia l
N D
N on -D et ec t N
S
No t S am
St op o n
Fi rs t P os iti ve
(N ot
A na ly
P re vi ou sly S am
M
P re su m ed a sb es to s c on ta in in g m at er ia l.
AC
M s & P
AC
M s i de nt ifi ed in b ol d sh ad cr ip o er ia l L oc at io n Sa m pl e e
F d
E st
Q m en t
C or re ct
W or kp la ce L ife S af et y Is su es a nd
A ba te A sb es le
A sb es to s M at er ia ls S am pl in g
T er so n B ar ra ck s, B ui ld in gs
2, V
A
ST
L H
C S, S t.
L ou is
. M ay
1, A
M I P ro je ct
-0
M M
-0
M w io us lo ca ug ho ut te r s ys te
/g ra ls th ro ug ho ut a re a
-1
1E
-3
2W
-2
3E
-2
4C V m G
C
-0 in su la tio n an d fit ou gh ou t r iti on al
T
SI
m ay b e co nc ea le d in w al ls a nd c ha se s.
R ef
H
M A
-1
F D am ag
L F
M F
*R ef r ep or tio na l i nf or m at
-0 yl fl oo r k m ns ou gh ou t r
H M
A -0
N
F ag ed r ep or tio na l i nf or m at
-0 in su la tio n se am m pi pe in su la tio n th ro ug ho ut
-0
Fi re st op io us w al l p en et ra tio n lo ca tio ns th ro ug ho ut te r s ys te
/g ra ls th ro ug ho ut a re a
-1
1E
-3
2W
-2
3E
-2
4C V le
A sb es to s M at er ia l S am pl in g
T
- N ot
A va ila bl e F
Fr ia bl e
N F
N on
-F ria bl e
SM
S ur fa ci ng M at er ia l
TS
I –
T he rm al
S ys te m
In su la tio n M
M
M isc el la ne ou s M at er ia l
N D
N on -D et ec t N
S
No t S am
St op o n
Fi rs t P os iti ve
(N ot
A na ly
P re vi ou sly S am
M
P re su m ed a sb es to s c on ta in in g m at er ia l.
AC
M s & P
AC
M s i de nt ifi ed in b ol d sh ad cr ip o er ia l L oc at io n Sa m pl e e
F d
E st
Q m en t
C or re ct
W or kp la ce L ife S af et y Is su es a nd
A ba te A sb es le
A sb es to s M at er ia ls S am pl in g
T er so n B ar ra ck s, B ui ld in gs
2, V
A
ST
L H
C S, S t.
L ou is
. M ay
1, A
M I P ro je ct
-0 m G
-0 yl fl oo r k m ns ou gh ou t r
H M
A -0
N
F G oo d r ep or tio na l i nf or m at
-0 in su la tio n se am m pi pe in su la tio n;
v ar lo ca tio ns th ro ug ho ut
-0 uc t s ea m se al an t G ra ba re d uc t s ea m s;
v ar tio ns th ro ug ho ut
-0 do w c au lk ra do w s a lo ng w es t w al l
-0 op l p en et ra tio n;
v ar tio ns th ro ug ho ut
-0
M M
7A yl w al l b as e, B la ck ng so ut h w al
-0
M
Ta ng so ut h w al te r s ys te
/g ra ls th ro ug ho ut a re a
-1
1E
-3
2W
-2
3E
-2
4C V le
A sb es to s M at er ia l S am pl in g
T
- N ot
A va ila bl e F
Fr ia bl e
N F
N on
-F ria bl e
SM
S ur fa ci ng M at er ia l
TS
I –
T he rm al
S ys te m
In su la tio n M
M
M isc el la ne ou s M at er ia l
N D
N on -D et ec t N
S
No t S am
St op o n
Fi rs t P os iti ve
(N ot
A na ly
P re vi ou sly S am
M
P re su m ed a sb es to s c on ta in in g m at er ia l.
AC
M s & P
AC
M s i de nt ifi ed in b ol d sh ad cr ip o er ia l L oc at io n Sa m pl e e
F d
E st
Q m en t
C or re ct
W or kp la ce L ife S af et y Is su es a nd
A ba te A sb es le
A sb es to s M at er ia ls S am pl in g
T er so n B ar ra ck s, B ui ld in gs
2, V
A
ST
L H
C S, S t.
L ou is
. M ay
1, A
M I P ro je ct
-0 m G
E
-0 yl fl oo r k m ns ou gh ou t r
H M
A -0
N
F G oo d r ep or tio na l i nf or m at
-0
M M yl w al l b as e, B ng n or th w ls
-0
A dh es iv e
Ta ng n or th w
-0 do w c do w s a lo ng so ut h, e as t a t w
-0 in su la tio n se am m pi pe in su la tio n;
v ar tio ns th ro ug ho ut te r s ys te
/g ra ls th ro ug ho ut a re a
-1
1E
-3
2W
-2
3E
-2
4C V m
-0 in su la tio n an d fit ou gh ou t r
H M
A -1 ag
L
F
M F
A C
M d eb ri s p re se nt
*R ef r ep or tio na l i nf or m at
Q ty a nd c on di tio of co nc ea le d T is un kn
-0 yl fl oo r k m ns ou gh ou t r
H M
A -0
N
F ag ed
S
F A
C M d eb ri s p re se nt le
A sb es to s M at er ia l S am pl in g
T
- N ot
A va ila bl e F
Fr ia bl e
N F
N on
-F ria bl e
SM
S ur fa ci ng M at er ia l
TS
I –
T he rm al
S ys te m
In su la tio n M
M
M isc el la ne ou s M at er ia l
N D
N on -D et ec t N
S
No t S am
St op o n
Fi rs t P os iti ve
(N ot
A na ly
P re vi ou sly S am
M
P re su m ed a sb es to s c on ta in in g m at er ia l.
AC
M s & P
AC
M s i de nt ifi ed in b ol d sh ad cr ip o er ia l L oc at io n Sa m pl e e
F d
E st
Q m en t
C or re ct
W or kp la ce L ife S af et y Is su es a nd
A ba te A sb es le
A sb es to s M at er ia ls S am pl in g
T er so n B ar ra ck s, B ui ld in gs
2, V
A
ST
L H
C S, S t.
L ou is
. M ay
1, A
M I P ro je ct
-0
SM
-0 te r s ys te
/g ra ls th ro ug ho ut a re a
-1
1E
-3
2W
-2
3E
-2
4C V
Se nd F lo or
, E as t W in g, S ou th
C en r
-0 fi tt bo ve a nd b el ow su sp en de d ce ili ng in
R oo m ve r ig id c ei lin ls c ha se s
PS
R ef
H M
A -1
F F F
G oo d
G oo d
F
L F
0M
F
L F
M
F
*R ef r ep or tio na l i nf or m at
Q ua nt iti es o f T ov e pl as te r ce ili ng s an d in w al ls a nd c ha se s ar e es tim at es o nl y.
te r s ys te
/g ra ls a nd re m na nt c ei ug ho ut a re a
-1
1E
-3
2W
-2
3E
-2
4C
V
-1
C
F
-0
M M yl fl oo r t ile
”x
Ta n w
/ b ro w n st re ak
Th ug ho ut C or rid or s H
3;
R oo m
E1
8, u nd er si nk oo m
E1
-0
M
Y ug ho ut C or rid or s H
3;
R oo m
E1
8, u nd er oo m
E1 le
A sb es to s M at er ia l S am pl in g
T
- N ot
A va ila bl e F
Fr ia bl e
N F
N on
-F ria bl e
SM
S ur fa ci ng M at er ia l
TS
I –
T he rm al
S ys te m
In su la tio n M
M
M isc el la ne ou s M at er ia l
N D
N on -D et ec t N
S
No t S am
St op o n
Fi rs t P os iti ve
(N ot
A na ly
P re vi ou sly S am
M
P re su m ed a sb es to s c on ta in in g m at er ia l.
AC
M s & P
AC
M s i de nt ifi ed in b ol d sh ad cr ip o er ia l L oc at io n Sa m pl e e
F d
E st
Q m en t
C or re ct
W or kp la ce L ife S af et y Is su es a nd
A ba te A sb es le
A sb es to s M at er ia ls S am pl in g
T er so n B ar ra ck s, B ui ld in gs
2, V
A
ST
L H
C S, S t.
L ou is
. M ay
1, A
M I P ro je ct
-0
M M
-0
M M
-9 0A yl fl oo r t ile
”x
C re am w / t an ak m s 2
E0 2, E0
3C , 2
E0 5, 2E
B
, 2 E0
6, E0 7, E0
7A
2E
, 2 E0
9, E1 1, E1
2, , 2 E3 m at er ia l m us t b e re m ov ed a s A C
M d ue so ci at io n w ith M
M -0
9A
M M
9A
-0
M m s 2 E
, 2
E
C , 2
E
2E
B
, 2 E0
6, E0 7, E0
7A
2E
, 2 E0
9, E1 1, 2, , 2 E3 hr ys ile
G oo d
2, -1
M M
Sh ee t f lo or in g
W hi te w
/ g ra y co nf et ti m ys oo d
S
-1
A dh es iv e
Y el m hr ys
G oo d
S
-1 t f lo or in g W m s 2 E1
6, E1 6A
2E
, E
-1
M M yl w al l b as e, B ro w rid or s H
H
3;
R oo m s
2E
, 2 E1
7, E
8, E
-1
A dh es iv e
Ta rid or s H
H
3;
R oo m s 2E
, 2
E1 7, E
8, E
-1
M M
3A yl w al l b as e, B m s 2 E0
2, E0 3C
, 2
B , 2
E0 6, E0
7, E0 7A
2E
, 2
E0 9, E1
1, E1 2, 3, , 2 E3
3A
-1
A dh es iv e
B ro w m s 2
E0 2, E0
3C , 2
B
, 2 E0
6, E0 7, E0
7A
2E
, 2 E0
9, E1 1, E1
2, 3, , 2
E3
-1 ei lin g til e, ’x
2’ te w
/ p itt pa tte rn rid or
H
1;
R oo m s 2 E1
E le
A sb es to s M at er ia l S am pl in g
T
- N ot
A va ila bl e F
Fr ia bl e
N F
N on
-F ria bl e
SM
S ur fa ci ng M at er ia l
TS
I –
T he rm al
S ys te m
In su la tio n M
M
M isc el la ne ou s M at er ia l
N D
N on -D et ec t N
S
No t S am
St op o n
Fi rs t P os iti ve
(N ot
A na ly
P re vi ou sly S am
M
P re su m ed a sb es to s c on ta in in g m at er ia l.
AC
M s & P
AC
M s i de nt ifi ed in b ol d sh ad cr ip o er ia l L oc at io n Sa m pl e e
F d
E st
Q m en t
C or re ct
W or kp la ce L ife S af et y Is su es a nd
A ba te A sb es le
A sb es to s M at er ia ls S am pl in g
T er so n B ar ra ck s, B ui ld in gs
2, V
A
ST
L H
C S, S t.
L ou is
. M ay
1, A
M I P ro je ct
-0
M M
-1 lin g til e, 4’ te w fis su re m s 2 E0
E0
-1 lin g til e, te w
/ p do t p at m s 2 E0
5B
6A
-1 xt ur e ca ul k W m s 2 E0
8, E1 2, 5;
rim et er o f s in ks a t w al
-1 ni sh in g ca ul k
W m s 2
E0 5, E0
5B , 2
E0
2E
; p er im et er o f c ou nt er s a t w al
-1 u nd er co at in g W m
E
B
E un de rs id e of hr ys
G oo d
-2
M M
-2 ry w al l
W rid or
H
R oo m s 2
9, E3
-2
-2
Jo in t c om po un d
W rid or
H
R oo m s 2
9, E3
-2 do w c m s 2 E0
2, E0 3C
, 2
B , 2
E0 6, E0
7, E0 7A
2E
, 2
E0 9, E1
1, E1 2, E3
-2 uc t s ea m se al an t G ra io us lo ca tio ns a bo ve c ei lin g th ro ug ho ut sp ac
-3
M M
-3 t f lo or in g
B ro w n w oo d gr ai m
E1
-3
-3
A dh es iv e
Y el m
E1 le
A sb es to s M at er ia l S am pl in g
T
- N ot
A va ila bl e F
Fr ia bl e
N F
N on
-F ria bl e
SM
S ur fa ci ng M at er ia l
TS
I –
T he rm al
S ys te m
In su la tio n M
M
M isc el la ne ou s M at er ia l
N D
N on -D et ec t N
S
No t S am
St op o n
Fi rs t P os iti ve
(N ot
A na ly
P re vi ou sly S am
M
P re su m ed a sb es to s c on ta in in g m at er ia l.
AC
M s & P
AC
M s i de nt ifi ed in b ol d sh ad cr ip o er ia l L oc at io n Sa m pl e e
F d
E st
Q m en t
C or re ct
W or kp la ce L ife S af et y Is su es a nd
A ba te A sb es le
A sb es to s M at er ia ls S am pl in g
T er so n B ar ra ck s, B ui ld in gs
2, V
A
ST
L H
C S, S t.
L ou is
. M ay
1, A
M I P ro je ct
-0
IL
D
IN
G m G
-2 ns ite p eg bo ar d pa ne ls
, 2 w al ls th ro ug ho ut r ys
G oo d s m at er ia l w su m…
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.
File details come from the government source that posted it.