2.2.1(e) Attachment E-Technical Evaluation Factors-Consolidation Requirement_08.03.2026.pdf
PDF 688 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 70FBR226R00000016
- Issued by
-
Federal Emergency Management Agency
About this file
This document contains the evaluation factors for a Request for Proposals (RFP) for a Consolidated Requirement involving Roof Refresh, Roof, Doors, and Concrete (RRCC) services. The Government will award a firm fixed-price contract to the offeror whose proposal is most advantageous, considering price and other factors in accordance with FAR Part 12.203 for commercial products and services. This is a best value procurement, and award will not necessarily be made to the lowest-priced proposal.
The evaluation will be conducted using three factors listed in descending order of importance: Factor 1 – Technical Specifications, Factor 2 – Past Performance, and Factor 3 – Price, with all non-price factors combined being slightly more important than price. For Technical Specifications, offerors must demonstrate understanding of the scope, complexity, performance requirements and objectives, and pertinent work tasks and deliverables through a detailed work plan responsive to the Statement of Work. Past Performance requires submission of three references from services performed within the past five years, including project title, role (prime or subcontractor), contract number, dollar value, period of performance, performing agency or company, work product summary, and client contact information; offerors will receive superior, satisfactory, unsatisfactory, or neutral ratings, with neutral ratings applicable to vendors without relevant government performance history. Price will be evaluated for reasonableness through comparison with other proposed prices, with unit prices and discounts examined to ensure fairness and reasonableness, though no confidence rating will be assigned. Questions must be submitted by September 8, 2026, at 10:00 AM ET, and proposals must be received by September 11, 2026, at 11:00 AM ET, directed to brenda.cruzrodriguez@fema.dhs.gov with a copy to brendaliz.pinero@fema.dhs.gov.
View the file
Other files
Show all 47
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Evaluation Factors
Requirement: Consolidated Requirement (RRCC Refresh, Roof, Doors and Concrete)
The Government will award a firm fixed-price contract resulting from this solicitation to the Offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. This procurement is being conducted in accordance with the procedures of Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 12.203, Evaluation of Acquisition of Commercial Products and Commercial Services The acquisition will be a best value contract. Offerors are cautioned that award(s) may not necessarily be made to the lowest priced proposal.
Price should always be fair, reasonable, and realistic. Technical/price tradeoff where other evaluation factors, when combined, cost/price may become a critical factor if two or more offerors are determined to be essentially equal following the evaluation of all factors other than cost or price.
The Government will evaluate proposal submissions based on the following evaluation factors, listed in descending order of importance:
Factor 1 – Technical Specifications
Factor 2 – Past Performance
Factor 3 – Price
All non-price factors, when combined, are slightly more important than price.
Factor 1: Technical Specifications
Offerors will be evaluated on their ability to demonstrate technical sufficiency in their proposed technical and management approach to perform and support the requirements of the Statement of Work (SOW). This section of the offeror’s proposal shall address information regarding how the proposal logistical support task areas will be performed, the various resources that will be used to facilitate performance, and an identification of potential difficulties in conducting the work with practical suggestions for overcoming these difficulties.
Offerors will be evaluated on their ability to develop a work plan in response to the SOW. Offerors must demonstrate an understanding of ALL OF THE FOLLOWING:
• Scope of technical requirements
• Complexity of technical requirements
• Performance requirements & objectives
• Pertinent work tasks & deliverables
70FBR226R00000016 Page 65 of 77
Factor 2: Past Performance
Provide past performance information for services directly related and relevant to the services to be performed under the SOW. To be considered relevant, the services must have been performed within the past five years. Include three references consisting of ALL OF THE FOLLOWING:
- Project title/description
- Role (Prime/Subcontractor)
- Contract number
- Dollar value & contract type
- Period of performance
- Agency or company for which the work was performed
- Summary of the work products/services
- Name/contact information of client point of contact
FEMA reserves the right to utilize past performance information other than the information submitted with the quotations received in conducting the evaluation. This may be a favorable CPARS rating.
However, if these are utilized and a Vendor does not have any ratings since they have not done business with the government, they will receive a neutral rating in the evaluation later that cannot be used against them.
RATING FOR PAST
PERFORMANCE
DESCRIPTION
Superior Based on an offeror’s past performance record, no doubt exists that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
Satisfactory Based on an offeror’s past performance record, it is likely that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
Unsatisfactory Based on an offeror’s past performance record, it is not likely that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
Neutral No relevant performance record is identifiable upon which to base a meaningful performance rating. This is neither a negative nor positive assessment.
RATING DESCRIPTION
Superior Exceeds requirements; outstanding approach and understanding.
Satisfactory Meets requirements; strengths and weaknesses are balanced.
Unsatisfactory Fails to meet requirements; significant weaknesses or deficiencies.
70FBR226R00000016 Page 66 of 77
Factor 3: Price
The price proposal will be evaluated for price reasonableness through comparison with other proposed prices and may include other price analysis techniques.
The price proposal will not be given a confidence rating, but unit prices and discounts will be evaluated to ensure prices are fair and reasonable.
-SPACE BELOW INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK-
Questions regarding this Request for Proposal (RFP) shall be directed via email to brenda.cruzrodriguez@fema.dhs.gov and a copy to brendaliz.pinero@fema.dhs.gov. Telephone inquiries will not be honored. All questions must be received no later than Tuesday, September 8, 2026, at 10:00 am ET.
Responses regarding this RFP shall be directed via email to brenda.cruzrodriguez@fema.dhs.gov and a copy to brendaliz.pinero@fema.dhs.gov.
All responses must be received no later than Friday, September 11, 2026, at 11:00 am ET.
70FBR226R00000016 Page 67 of 77 mailto:brenda.cruzrodriguez@fema.dhs.gov mailto:brendaliz.pinero@fema.dhs.gov mailto:brenda.cruzrodriguez@fema.dhs.gov mailto:brendaliz.pinero@fema.dhs.gov
| 2.2.1(d) Attachment D-Notice to Offerors-Statement of Contractor Assurance.pdf |
| U.S. Department of Homeland Security |
| 500 C Street, SW |
| Washington DC 20472 |
| 2.2.1(g) Attachment G-CLIN Pricing Excel Sheet.pdf |
| Pricing Proposal |
| 1.1.3 SOW_CONSOLIDATED - Roof Doors RRCC and Concrete_ v5_08.19.2026 Security Edits.pdf |
| STATEMENT OF WORK FOR: |
| Comprehensive Facility Upgrades for Building C-54, Naval Weapons Station, Earle |
| Statement of Work (SOW) for Comprehensive Facility |
| Upgrades for Building C-54, Naval Weapon Station Earle |
| 1. Purpose |
| The purpose of this project is to provide comprehensive facility upgrades to Building C-54 at Naval Weapons Station Earle (NWSE). The scope includes: |
| 1) Installation and upgrade of automated, ADA-compliant access doors at exterior entry points (please see attachment A for more details), as well as installation of nine (9) wood doors with glazed windows for conference rooms and offices within the fa... |
| 2) Repair, restoration, and waterproofing of the office building roof. |
| 3) Renovation and modernization of the Regional Response Coordination Center (RRCC), including flooring, walls, electrical and communication infrastructure. |
| 4) Repair, patching, and expansion of exterior cement surfaces, including the loading dock, sidewalks, and patio area, to improve safety, accessibility, and support future facility enhancements. |
| These upgrades will enhance safety, accessibility, operational reliability, and compliance with all applicable standards to support FEMA’s mission requirements. |
| 2. Background |
| 3. Scope of Work (Summary) |
| Please also refer to Attachment A Specs for doors and Attachment B A100 Floor plan for details. |
| Background Investigations: |
| Low Risk without Information System Access: |
| Low Risk with Information System Access: |
| Moderate Risk: |
| High Risk: |
| Background Investigation Process: |
| Continued Eligibility and Reinvestigation: |
| Exclusion by Contracting Officer: |
| OPSEC Training: |
| Insider Threat Training: |
| 2.2.1 Solicitation 70FBR226R00000016.pdf |
| Solicitation/Contract/Order for commercial products and commercial services |
| Requisition number |
| Contract number |
| Award/Effective date |
| Order number |
| Solicitation number |
| Solicitation issue date |
| For solicitation information call: |
| Name |
| Telephone number |
| Offer due date/local time |
| Issued by |
| Code |
| This acquisition is |
| NAICS |
| Size standard |
| Delivery for free on board (FOB) destination unless block is marked |
| Discount terms |
| This contract is a rated order under the defense priorities and allocations system - DPAS |
| Rating |
| Method of solicitation |
| Deliver to |
| Code |
| Administered by |
| Code |
| Contractor/Offeror |
| Code |
| Facility code |
| Telephone number |
| Check if remittance is different and put such address in offer |
| Payment will be made by |
| Code |
| Submit invoices to address shown in block 18a unless block below is checked |
| Accounting and appropriation data |
| Total award amount |
| Solicitation incorporates by reference |
| Addenda |
| Contract/purchase order incorporates by reference |
| Addenda |
| Contractor is required to sign this doc. and return: |
| Award of contract: reference |
| Signature of offeror/contractor |
| Name and title of signer |
| Signer date signed |
| Signature of contracting officer |
| Name of contracting officer |
| Contracting officer date signed |
| Authorized for local reproduction. Previous edition is not usable |
| Standard Form 1449 (Rev. 11/2021) |
| Quantity in column 21 has been |
| Signature of authorized government representative |
| Date |
| Printed name and title of authorized government representative |
| Mailing address authorized government representative |
| Telephone number of authorized government representative |
| Email number of authorized government representative |
| Ship number |
| Voucher number |
| Amount verified correct for |
| Payment |
| Check number |
| Stock record (S/R) |
| S/R account number |
| S/R voucher number |
| Paid by |
| I certify this account is correct and proper for payment |
| Signature and title of certifying officer |
| Date |
| Received by |
| Received at |
| Date received |
| Total containers |
| Standard Form 1449 (rev. 11/2021) Back |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .