2_Attachment_A_Past_Performance_Project_Relevancy_Form.pdf
PDF 124 KB Posted
- Attached to
- W912DW24R0001 - Chief Joseph Dam (CJD) Excitation System Units 1-16 Replacement Project.
- Solicitation number
- W912DW24R0001
About this file
The document provided is Attachment A - Past Performance Project Relevancy Information Summary Form, which is part of a solicitation for the Chief Joseph Dam Units 1-16 Excitation System Replacement project in Bridgeport, WA. The form requests offerors to provide detailed information about a relevant past performance project, including the project name, location, client contact information, contract details, the offeror's role and percentage of work performed, project timeline, cost information, a general project narrative, and any performance issues encountered. Offerors are also asked to highlight how the past performance project meets the specific criteria outlined in Section 01 11 00.00 26 of the solicitation. This information will be used to evaluate the offeror's relevant past experience for this project.
View the file
Other files
Show all 33
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT A – PAST PERFORMANCE PROJECT RELEVANCY INFORMATION
SUMMARY FORM
Past Performance Project Relevancy
Information Summary Form
Project Name:
Project Location:
Address:
Installation Name (if applicable)
Owners/Client Point of Contract (POC):
POC Name:
POC Phone Number:
POC E-mail:
Contract Number: Task Order Number (if applicable):
Was the project terminated early, were cure/show-cause letters issued or were Liquidated Damages assessed? Yes or No (if yes, explain)
Offeror’s Role: (Prime or Subcontractor)
[What specific items of work did you perform as the prime or subcontractor]
Percentage of total value of contract performed by the Offeror: (If the Offeror was the Prime, what percentage was subcontracted; if the Offeror was the subcontractor, what dollar amount and percentage of the total project amount, as well as the total contract amount, was awarded to the subcontractor?)
Date Contract and/or Award began: Original Completion Date:
Actual Completion Date (or ongoing, if applicable):
Initial Award Amount: Final Contract Amount:
Amount added by modification(s): Percentage the project is physically complete to date:
Explanation (reason) of any cost growth:
Explanation of any late finish or time extensions:
General Project Narrative: [General scope. Provide a description of the project. Be sure to include features of this project that make it comparable in type or nature to the proposed project described in this request for proposal. At a minimum provide a brief explanation of what was designed, manufactured, and installed including the rating, size, and type of equipment applicable to this experience criterion. Discuss specific details of the project, at a minimum, describe what was constructed and clearly explain the aspects that are similar to construction of this solicitation.]
Performance Issues Encountered: [Describe any performance issues encountered. This could include technical, cost/schedule, health and safety issues, regulatory/stakeholder issues, and other performance issues, as well as what was implemented to overcome these issues and the results.]
Applicable Section 01 11 00.00 26 Criteria: [highlight specific elements from the Section 01 11 00.00 26 of this Solicitation that encompasses each submitted past performance project]
Major Project Accomplishments:
END OF ATTACHMENT A
| ATTACHMENT A – PAST PERFORMANCE PROJECT RELEVANCY INFORMATION |
| SUMMARY FORM |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .