NIGP 48550: Door Mats, All Types

NIGP 48550 Door Mats, All Types is an Item code under which state and local governments procure entrance and floor mats for facilities maintenance, most commonly as part of larger janitorial and custodial supply contracts that bundle mats with cleaning chemicals, paper products, and related equipment. Recent solicitations show governments buying mats through three distinct procurement models: as consumable inventory items stocked at central warehouses, as weekly rental and replacement services managed by third-party vendors, and as embedded line items within broad-based janitorial supply ITBs and RFPs. School districts, county government, municipal departments, and state agencies issue these solicitations; school districts are the most frequent buyers, followed by county governments and independent state departments.

Recent activity spans Florida, Georgia, Texas, Mississippi, and Oregon. School districts in Pinellas County and Marion County, Florida; Marion County, Mississippi; Madison County and Muscogee County, Georgia are all procuring door mats as part of custodial supply contracts with estimated annual values ranging from $765,679 to $900,000. Hillsborough County Board of County Commissioners (Florida) issued ITB2600319 for janitorial and operational supplies due July 24, 2026, estimated at $765,679.84 for Hillsborough County Fire Rescue; Muscogee County School District (Georgia) released solicitation 26-022 for custodial supplies and equipment due May 22, 2026, with contract commencement July 1, 2026; and Marion County School District (Mississippi) solicited mat and mop rental services due June 3, 2026. The Oregon Department of Veterans' Affairs issued RFQ #S-27400-00015996 for floor mat services and custodial supplies at its Salem building due March 12, 2026. Harris County, Texas procured uniform rental with weekly floor mat services under ITB 260058 due May 4, 2026. Entry barriers include compliance with insurance, E-Verify, debarment, and material safety documentation requirements; large school district contracts often evaluate on cost alone after meeting qualifications, while county government frequently uses best-value evaluation incorporating responsiveness, quality, and delivery capability.