Solicitation Amendment W912PF25QA0920005 SF 30.pdf

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended. is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER.

If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER

NUMBER IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print) 16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

16C. DATE SIGNED

Previous edition unusable STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016) Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUISITION NUMBER 5. PROJECT NUMBER (If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

CODE FACILITY CODE

SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

List of Contract Documents, Exhibits, or Attachments

The attachments table has changed from:

Identifier Document Name Document Description Reference Identifier

Date Line Item Page Numbers

Document Type

Provided Under Separate Cover

A02-

SOW_R1_20250911

Statement of Work 11 Sep 2025 30 Attachment No

B08-RFP_Atch7_SS

_44_RTU_MULTIF

ILARE_20240601

Supporting Technical Documentation 01 Jun 2024 Attachment No

B08-RFP_Atch6_SS

_44_PLC

ABB_20240601

Supporting Technical Documentation 01 Jun 2024 Attachment No

B08- RFP_Atch8_T601- Smart Grid_As Built_20230130

Drawings 30 Jan 2023 Attachment No

B08-RFP_Atch2_S

OW_GENERAL_20

230127

Statement of Work 27 Jan 2023 180 Attachment No

B08- RFP__Atch3_QA L

OG_MASTER_202

50912

Q&A Log 12 Sep 2025 1 Attachment No

B08- RFP_Atch5_Anti- Mafia Certification_ 20250804

Anti-Mafia Certification 04 Aug 2025 1 Attachment No

B08-RFP_Atch4_Bi dSchedule_CLIN00 01_20250904

Bid Schedule - CLIN0001 04 Sep 2025 Attachment No

B08-RFP_Atch4_Bi dSchedule_CLIN00 02_20250904

Bid Schedule - CLIN0002 04 Sep 2025 Attachment No

B08-RFP_Atch4_Bi dSchedule_CLIN00 03_20250904

Bid Schedule - CLIN0003 04 Sep 2025 Attachment No

B08-RFP_Atch4_Bi dSchedule_CLIN00 04_20250904

Bid Schedule - CLIN0004 04 Sep 2025 Attachment No

To:

Identifier Document Name Document Description Reference Identifier

Date Line Item Page Numbers

Document Type

Provided Under Separate Cover

A02-

SOW_R1_20250911

Statement of Work 11 Sep 2025 28 Attachment No

B08-RFP_Atch7_SS

_44_RTU_MULTIF

ILARE_20240601

Supporting Technical Documentation 01 Jun 2024 14 Attachment No

B08-RFP_Atch6_SS

_44_PLC

ABB_20240601

Supporting Technical Documentation 01 Jun 2024 15 Attachment No

B08- RFP_Atch8_T601- Smart Grid_As Built_20230130

Drawings 30 Jan 2023 1 Attachment No

B08-RFP_Atch1.

8_SOW_REC -

BESS at Longare Proponent Signed_20250725

Record of Environmental Consideration 19 Apr 2024 23 Attachment No

B08-RFP_Atch2_S OW_GENERAL_20 Statement of Work 27 Jan 2023 180 Attachment No

W912PF25QA0920005

230127

B08- RFP__Atch3_QA L

OG_MASTER_202

50912

Q&A Log 12 Sep 2025 8 Attachment No

B08- RFP_Atch5_Anti- Mafia Certification_ 20250804

Anti-Mafia Certification 04 Aug 2025 1 Attachment No

B08-RFP_Atch4_Bi dSchedule_CLIN00 01_20250904

Bid Schedule - CLIN0001 04 Sep 2025 1 Attachment No

B08-RFP_Atch4_Bi dSchedule_CLIN00 02_20250904

Bid Schedule - CLIN0002 04 Sep 2025 1 Attachment No

B08-RFP_Atch4_Bi dSchedule_CLIN00 03_20250904

Bid Schedule - CLIN0003 04 Sep 2025 1 Attachment No

B08-RFP_Atch4_Bi dSchedule_CLIN00 04_20250904

Bid Schedule - CLIN0004 04 Sep 2025 1 Attachment No

The following contract documents were added:

B08-RFP_Atch1.8_SOW_REC - BESS at Longare Proponent Signed_20250725

The following contract documents Page Counts were changed:

DOCUMENT PAGE COUNTS

DOCUMENT NAME FROM TO

B08-RFP_Atch1.8_SOW_REC - BESS at Longare Proponent Signed_20250725 none 23

Addendum to Evaluation - Commercial Product and Commercial Services

Miscellaneous text in this section has been modified to:

ADDENDUM TO FAR 52.212-2 - EVALUATION--COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS AND COMMERCIAL

SERVICES

(a) General Information

The Government intends to award a single Firm-Fixed-Price contract under FAR 13.5 - Simplified Procedures for Certain Commercial Products and Commercial Services to the offeror responsible, whose proposal provides the best value to the Government. The Government will conduct a best-value tradeoff, considering the evaluation factors described herein. Proposals will be evaluated based solely on the information provided in the offeror's proposal volumes. The Government intends to award without discussions but reserves the right to do so if it is in the Government's best interest.

(b) Basis for Award and Relative Importance of Factors

The award decision will be based on an integrated assessment of the following four (4) evaluation factors. The relative order of importance for the factors is as follows:

Factor 1: Technical Approach

Factor 2: Corporate Experience & Factor 3: Past Performance

Factor 4: Price

Factor 1, Technical Approach, is the most important factor. Factor 2, Corporate Experience, and Factor 3, Past Performance, are of equal importance to each other. Both Factor 2 and Factor 3 are of equal importance, and individually are less important than Factor 1, but are more important than Factor 4, Price. All non-price factors (Factors 2, 3, and 4)(Factors 1, 2, and 3), when combined, are significantly more important than Price.

Factor 1, Technical Approach, is the most important evaluation factor. Factor 2, Corporate Experience, and Factor 3, Past Performance, are of equal importance to each other. Individually, Factor 2 and Factor 3 are less important than Factor 1 but are more important than Factor 4, Price.

(a) Basis for Award

The Government intends to award a single Firm-Fixed-Price contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose proposal represents the best value to the Government. This determination will be made in accordance with the policies and procedures of FAR 13.5, Simplified Procedures for Certain Commercial Products and Commercial Services. The Government will conduct a best-value tradeoff, considering the evaluation factors described below. The Government intends to award without discussions but reserves the right to do so if it is in the Government's best interest.

(b) Relative Importance of Factors

Factor 1, Technical Approach, is the most important evaluation factor. Factor 2, Corporate Experience, and Factor 3, Past Performance, are of equal importance to each other. Individually, Factor 2 and Factor 3 are less important than Factor 1 but are more important than Factor 4, Price.

Evaluation factors are listed below in descending order of importance:

Factor 1: Technical Approach. The Government will evaluate the information submitted in Volume II to assess the soundness of the proposed BESS design and the feasibility and risk of the proposed Project Execution Plan.

The evaluation will consider:

The degree to which the proposed BESS system meets or exceeds the technical specifications of the Statement of Work (SOW), including considerations for system efficiency, warranty, and long-term maintenance.

The clarity, logic, and effectiveness of the Project Execution Plan, with special emphasis on the offeror's demonstrated understanding of and methodology for navigating Italian regulatory and permitting requirements and minimizing disruption to base operations.

Factor 1: Technical Approach. The Government will evaluate the offeror's Volume II submission to assess the soundness of the proposed technical solution and the degree to which the proposal demonstrates a comprehensive understanding of the requirements. The evaluation will be based on the following:

a: BESS System and Design: The Government will evaluate the degree to which the proposed BESS system, as detailed in the narrative and supporting documentation, meets or exceeds the technical specifications of the SOW.

This includes an assessment of the system's components, efficiency, warranty, and long-term maintenance provisions.

b: Project Execution Plan: The Government will evaluate the clarity, logic, and feasibility of the offeror's methodology for executing the project. The assessment will focus on the offeror's approach to minimizing disruption to base operations and the credibility of its plan to navigate the specific Italian regulatory and permitting requirements identified in the SOW.

Factor 2: Corporate Experience. The G overnment will evaluate the information submitted in Volume III to assess the relevance of the offeror's experience. The evaluation will focus on the degree to which the offeror's prior work is similar in size, scope, and complexity to the requirements of the SOW. The assessment will consider the technical challenges described and the effectiveness of the solutions implemented as an indicator of the offeror's technical capability and understanding.

Factor 2: Corporate Experience. The Government will evaluate the offeror's Volume III submission to assess the relevance of its corporate experience. The evaluation will focus on the degree to which the offeror's prior projects are similar in size, scope (BESS 250kVA/500kWh), complexity (microgrid integration), and location (Italy) to the requirements of this solicitation. The assessment will consider the technical challenges described and the effectiveness of the solutions implemented as a key indicator of the offeror's technical and management capabilities.

Factor 3: Past Performance. The Government will evaluate the information submitted in Volume IV and other sources of information (e.g., CPARS, government databases, reference checks) to assess the quality of the offeror's performance record. The evaluation will use the definitions for Recency and Relevancy as stated in the solicitation instructions. This evaluation results in a performance confidence assessment, which determines the Government's level of confidence that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. The evaluation will consider timeliness, cost control, quality of work, and overall customer satisfaction. An offeror with no relevant past performance record will not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on this factor.

Factor 3: Past Performance. The Government will conduct a performance confidence assessment based on the offeror's Volume IV submission and other available sources (e.g., CPARS, reference checks). The evaluation will assess the Government's confidence in the offeror's ability to successfully perform the required effort based on its demonstrated record of timeliness, cost control, quality of work, and overall customer satisfaction on recent and relevant projects. Relevancy and recency will be determined as defined in the Addendum to 52.212-1. An offeror with no record of relevant past performance will not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on this factor and will receive a "Neutral" rating.

Factor 4: Price. The Government will evaluate the offeror's proposed price as submitted in Volume V for reasonableness and completeness.

Factor 4: Price. The Government will evaluate the offeror's proposed price as submitted in Volume V for reasonableness, completeness, and balance in accordance with FAR 13.106-3.

(d) Award Methodology

The Government will conduct a comparative evaluation of proposals in accordance with the factors above. The evaluation will identify the specific strengths, weaknesses, and risks of each proposal to determine the most advantageous offer. The Contracting Officer (KO) may determine that a higher-rated, higher-priced proposal provides a better value to the Government than a lower-rated, lower-priced proposal if the KO reasonably determines that the technical superiority, more relevant experience, or lower performance risk of the higher-priced proposal warrants the additional cost. The Government will identify the Strengths, Weaknesses, and Risks in submitted proposals.

A Strength is an aspect of the proposal that exceeds a requirement and provides a benefit to the Government (e.g., proposing a BESS with a 15-year warranty when the standard is 10).

A Weakness is a flaw in the proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful performance (e.g., a vague project execution plan).

A Risk is a potential for future unsuccessful performance (e.g., relying on a key subcontractor with no proven BESS experience).

(c) Award Methodology

The source selection methodology will be a best-value tradeoff. The Government's evaluation will identify the specific strengths, weaknesses, and risks in each proposal to determine the most advantageous offer. The Government may award to a higher-priced offeror if the Contracting Officer reasonably determines that the technical superiority, more relevant experience, or lower performance risk of the higher-priced proposal warrants the additional cost. The following definitions will be used:

Strength: An aspect of the proposal that exceeds a requirement and provides a benefit to the Government.

Weakness: A flaw in the proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful performance.

Risk: A potential event or condition, identified in the proposal, which could jeopardize the successful performance of the contract.

(e) Responsibility Determination

Information submitted under Volume I (Mandatory Documentation Required) will not be evaluated as part of the best-value tradeoff. This information will be used solely by the Contracting Officer to make an independent determination of responsibility for the prospective awardee in accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 9.104. Failure to submit all required documents in accordance with the solicitation requirements may result in the offer being determined ineligible for award.

(d) Responsibility Determination

Information submitted under Volume I will not be evaluated as part of the best-value tradeoff. This information will be used solely by the Contracting Officer to make an independent determination of responsibility for the prospective awardee in accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 9.104. Failure to submit all required documents in accordance with the solicitation requirements may result in the offer being determined ineligible for award.

KO DIRECTORATE OF CONTRACTING, UNIT 31423 BOX 77

APO, AE 09630

UNITED STATES

JOHN ORBAN, EMAIL: JOHN.C.ORBAN.CIV@ARMY.MIL TELEPHONE: 646-6989

AdminBy:

SCD: PAS:

1. INCORPORATE REVISED ADDENDUM 52.212-2