ProjNetQuestionsAnswers.pdf

UNCLASSIFIED\\FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

Bid Inquiry Contractor Report All Inquiries

Project: MEDCOM Design Build MATOC 2.0 Review: RFP Review (00001) (sorted by CommentID ) Displaying 38 inquiries.

Id Discipline Sheet Detail Spec

8093966 Contracting RFP, pg. 26

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

The placement of the SF 1442 and amendments is only referenced for Phase II. Where in the Phase I volume are these to be placed?

On: Jul 15 2019.

Government Response. . The SF1442 and any acknowledged amendments should be included in the Phase I volume package. On: Jul 16 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8093978 Contracting RFP, Attachment 2

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Is the Proposal Data Sheet (Attachment 2) to be included in the Phase I proposal, and if so, where should it be placed?

On: Jul 15 2019.

Government Response. . Yes, proposal data sheet(attachment 2) should be included and should be submitted in the Phase I volume package after the cover page. On: Jul 16 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8095943 Contracting Pg. 19/205 N/A

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Reference: Phase 1 – General Requirements (pg. 19/205) "The estimated minimum size of a task order is $250K.

The estimated maximum size of a task order is $15M with an average size task order being approximately $5M" Question: How many task orders were awarded on the previous MSRM MEDCOM Contract?

Question: What was the average size of task orders on the previous MSRM MEDCOM Contract?

Question: How much is expected to be spent each year under this MSRM MEDCOM Contract?

On: Jul 16 2019.

Government Response. . 1.)Three task orders were awarded.

2.)Average size range from $250K/$17.5M.

3.)Expected awards per year is between $40M-$50M. On: Jul 17 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8095949 Contracting Pg. 21/205 N/A N/A

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Reference: Phase 1 – Factor 2: Technical/Specialized Experience (pg. 21/205) Question: Will the government consider extending the years of relevant experience due to the inactivity on the current generation of this contract? Please consider allowing consideration of relevant past experience up to 8 years old.

Question: Will the government consider removing "and in a healthcare facility" from the requirement "A minimum of three shall be projects of at least $3M and in a healthcare facility" to allow contractors to submit other projects that are similar in size, scope, and complexity? For example: 3 of 5 projects must be in active healthcare facilities; 3 of 5 projects must ne over $3M; all projects must be SRM-type projects.

On: Jul 16 2019.

Government Response. . No, this is a medical MATOC. The contract price cap will be reduced from $3M to $1.5M but the number of years remain unchanged. On: Jul 22 2019

Page 1 of 10ProjNet: Logged In User

8/5/2019https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicPublicReportAll...

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8096273 Specifications RFP Section 00 22 16 - Factor 2

- Specialized Experience

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Regarding Factor 2-Specialized Experience: Since there is no historical data from the previous contract for comparison, would the government considering removing the $3M size requirement for projects that are submitted for this factor?

On: Jul 16 2019.

Government Response. . An amendment is forthcoming to adjust the dollar amount. On: Jul 17 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8096287 Specifications Factor 2: Technical/Specialized

Experience

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Regarding Factor 2: If the Prime Offeror has established a formal teaming agreement with a design firm, can the design firm provide D-B project(s) along with the Prime, as long as the total number of projects do not exceed five?

On: Jul 16 2019.

Government Response. . Please see the third paragraph in Phase 1, Factor 2 which should answer the question as I have understood.

"...each member of the teaming arrangement and/or JV may provide a combined total of five (5) projects..."

That is "yes", combined total of 5 On: Jul 24 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8096305 Contracting 00 22 16 Factor 4

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

For past performance projects that do not have a CPARS evaluation, will the Government accept a PPQ (Form PPQ-0) that has been previously signed by the customer?

On: Jul 16 2019.

Government Response. . Please submit in accordance with the evaluation criteria. On: Jul 22 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8098833 Contracting RFP Resumes Support Personnel

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Is the offeror required to submit resumes for support personnel?

On: Jul 18 2019.

Government Response. . Yes On: Jul 23 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8103888 Contracting RFP RFP Factors 2 and 3

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

If the Prime Offeror has a formal teaming agreement with another firm, can projects and personnel be utilized from both companies?

On: Jul 22 2019.

Government Response. . Please see the Phase 1, Factors 2 and 3 "Submission Requirements". On: Jul 24 2019

Page 2 of 10ProjNet: Logged In User

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8104553 Construction Management

000_Div_00_TOC_DB_MATOC_2

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Reference: 000_Div_00_TOC_DB_MATOC_2 p. 15 of 64 (Structural/Civil Engineer) A Structural Engineer and Civil Engineer are two different positions. The qualifications seem to be trying to cover both by stating "These individuals..."

Question: Does the government require a resume for both a Structural Engineer and Civil Engineer or just one resume for one the positions?

On: Jul 22 2019.

Government Response. . Provide resumes for Structural and Civil. On: Jul 24 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8104557 Construction Management

000_Div_00_TOC_DB_MATOC_2

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Reference: 000_Div_00_TOC_DB_MATOC_2 p.15 of 64 (2. Construction Management/Field Support Staff).

Question: Will the government please define what positions (resumes) are required to meet the construction management key personnel qualifications for Construction/Field Support Staff?

On: Jul 22 2019.

Government Response. . This section highlights the involvement of construction in the design phase and the coordination of the overall Design-Build efforts. The first sentence and latter are descriptors of actions and involvements of the contractor's personnel. "The Contractor's construction management key personnel shall be....". On: Jul 25 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8104581 Construction Management

000_Div_00_TOC_DB_MATOC_2

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Reference: 000_Div_00_TOC_DB_MATOC_2 p. 15 of 64 (3. Equipment/Product Installers)"All contractors/installers shall be manufacturer approved/certified for the furnishings, equipment, and systems they install."

Question: What type of equipment is the government looking for?

On: Jul 22 2019.

Government Response. . Equipment types will be task order specific and addressed in the task order RFPs. Examples includes typical building equipment (HVAC), but as noted in the RFP this is a MATOC for medical projects. Therefore, med gas equipment will certainly be in a project. Please review solicitation materials. On: Jul 25 2019

Government Response. . Equipment types will be task order specific and addressed in the task order RFPs. Examples includes typical building equipment (HVAC), but as noted in the RFP this is a MATOC for medical projects. Therefore, med gas equipment will certainly be in a project. Please review solicitation materials. On: Jul 25 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8106974 Contracting RFP Factor 3 Resumes

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Is the offeror required to submit resumes for support personnel in the Phase 1 proposal?

On: Jul 24 2019.

Page 3 of 10ProjNet: Logged In User

Government Response. . Yes On: Jul 25 2019

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8108067 Project

Management Factor 3 Key Personnel

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Factor 3 on page 23/205 of the solicitation; the Submission Requirement states in part: "Provide a narrative listing of personnel subcontractors/team arrangements required for a typical project and why they are qualified to manage the program." Although the submission requirement for the one-page resumes is clear, it is not clear what should be included in the "narrative listing." Therefore, please explain what should be included in this narrative

On: Jul 24 2019.

Government Response. . Please review the PWS Section II A and B, pp. 11+, which provides additional details. On: Jul 25 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8108391 Materials NA

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

25 July 2019

Sir:

We are asking contracting officers for consideration to include FAR Clause 52.208-9, Contractor Use of Mandatory Sources of Supply or Services for construction projects, for door hardware in your current and future acquisition purchases, to follow this Federal Mandated Program.

As you know, the AbilityOne Network Program employs more than 45,000 individuals, including 3,000 of who are military veterans, wounded warriors and others that are blind or have disabilities. This Independent Federal Agency Program leverages a national network of more than 550 community-based nonprofit agencies to provide meaningful employment.

The Javits-Wagner-O'Day (JWOD) Act, 41 U.S.C. 46-48c, established a procurement program, (PL), to increase employment opportunities for these individuals.

This Act makes it mandatory for all federal agencies to purchase certain supplies and services from designated nonprofit agencies.

On 5 February 2016; VisionCorps, a nonprofit agency and PDQ, Manufacturer of Door hardware, both based in Lancaster, Pennsylvania, jointly announced the formation of the co-brand SKILCRAFT/PDQ, an AbilityOne Distributor for SKILCRAFT/PDQ Door Hardware Products.

Additional items may be available from the mandatory source. AbilityOne's procurement products list (PL), can be searched at: www.abilityone.com, or Contact: SKILCRAFT.ASP@VisionCorps.net.

We thank you for your time and considerations with this request!

On: Jul 25 2019.

Government Response. . This clause does not apply to construction contracts. It only apply to supply and service contracts. On: Jul 25 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8114157 Construction Management

RFP

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Reference: 000_Div_00_TOC_DB_MATOC_2 p. 15 of 64 (3. Equipment/Product Installers)"All contractors/installers shall be manufacturer approved/certified for the furnishings, equipment, and systems they install."

Question: What type of IO equipment/systems is the government looking for (medgas, hvac, electrical, fire alarm)?

Page 4 of 10ProjNet: Logged In User

On: Jul 29 2019.

Government Response. . This is not a DBIO so Initial Outfitting will not be part of the TO (Task Order).

On: Jul 31 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8116085 General n/a SB Verification

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Are SBA-issued certified letters, or any other official proof of small business status, required anywhere in the solicitation?

On: Jul 30 2019.

Government Response. . Please review the solicitation for submission requirements. On: Aug 01 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8116091 General n/a JV / Teaming Agreements

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Where should official, executed Joint Venture Contracts and/or Teaming Agreements with architects and subcontractors be located in the proposal? Or is this documentation not required in Phase I, only the information listed on the Proposal Data Sheet (Attachment 2)?

On: Jul 30 2019.

Government Response. . On attachment 2 form On: Aug 01 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8116096 General n/a Past Performance

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

PHASE 1 - FACTOR 2: TECHNICAL/SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE (VOL 1, TAB B) verses PHASE 1 - FACTOR 4:

PAST PERFORMANCE (VOL 1, TAB D):

a. Please clarify the following differences in the government's requirements for these different sections:

i. Factor 2 requires a max of five projects, and no page limit per project profile is required. Factor 4 requires a max of 4 projects, and has a max page limit of 4 pages per profile. Correct?

ii. Factor 2 past projects give the option of using projects from either Joint Venture partner, for a total combination of 5 projects. Factor 4 does not have any stipulations on whether the project comes from a specific member of a JV team. Correct?

iii. Factor 2 projects do not require the government to check CCASS/CPARS or submit a PPQ for those projects.

Factor 4 does require the government to check CCASS/CPARS or have the client submit a PPQ to the government.

Correct?

iv. Is it preferred by the government that we repeat 4 of the 5 projects from Factor 2 and profile them again in Factor 4? Or is the offeror allowed to submit 4 completely different projects in Factor 4, showing a broader spectrum of our past work? Does overlap between Factor 2 projects and Factor 4 projects harm or help in the government's evaluation criteria?

On: Jul 30 2019.

Government Response. . i. Yes. Factor 2 has a maximum total page requirement only. Factor 4 has both a total for the factor and maximum per Performance history provided.

ii. See Factor 4 (b).

iii. Yes, your query is correct in regard to Factor 2 is "Technical/Specialized Experience and Factor 4 is "Past Performance". Note that Factor 4 (e) permits the Government to latitude in past performance investigation.

iv. Factors are evaluated on the Factor's "Evaluation Criteria". On: Aug 01 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8116097 General n/a Page Format

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Page 5 of 10ProjNet: Logged In User

Page 18 of 205; 3. Proposal Format: "SHEET-PAGE EXAMPLE. An 8 ½ x11 sheet of paper contains one (1) page of content if printed only on one side, or two (2) pages of content if printed front and back. So if a section's limitation states 6 pages without any further guidance, the section may consist of 6 sheets of paper with printing on one side or 3 sheets of paper, double-sided prints."

a. It is clear that 11" x 17" pages may only be printed on one side. But the government is unclear on whether single or double sided printing on standard 8.5" x 11" pages is preferred. Please clarify explicitly whether the government prefers double-sided printing for 8.5"x11" hard copy pages.

On: Jul 30 2019.

Government Response. . There is no preference provided. Either may be submitted. On: Aug 01 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8118051 Other Solicitation (p.21, Phase 1 -

Factor 2

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Phase 1, Factor 2: May offerors submit the experience of an A/E teaming partner as part of its five projects, provided a teaming agreement is present? If not, would the government consider amending this requirement, considering the key role an A/E would have?

On: Jul 31 2019.

Government Response. . No amendment is required at this time. Please submit as required. On: Aug 01

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8118052 Other Solicitation (p.21, Phase 1 -

Factor 2)

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Phase 1, Factor 2: Would the government consider amending the solicitation to allow offerors to submit bid/build projects instead of or in addition to design/build projects? We feel that the RFP as written would limit unnecessarily the number of well-qualified firms from eligibility and require offerors to omit valuable and highly relevant projects, performed in active hospitals and related medical facilities, from their submissions--and believe that these adjustments would be to the government's benefit, as regards number of well-qualified proposals submitted.

On: Jul 31 2019.

Government Response. . No amendment will be released at this time. On: Aug 01 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8118053 Contracting PWS 15 of 64

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Please provide Attachment A - Project Objectives, as referenced on page 15 of 64 in the Performance Work Statement in order to determine the requirements for the resumes for the support personnel.

On: Jul 31 2019.

Government Response. . Attachment A will provide any additional Task Order specific requirements for support personnel. This is not part of the Phase 1 solicitation. On: Aug 01 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8118054 Other Solicitation (p.21, Phase 1 -

Factor 2)

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Phase 1, Factor 2: Would the government consider amending the RFP to allow projects completed in the past ten years (instead of six years) and projects that are at least 80% complete and at or past Red Zone (in addition to or in lieu of projects that have achieved final completion)? We feel that the RFP as written would limit unnecessarily the number of well-qualified firms from eligibility and require offerors to omit valuable and highly relevant projects, Page 6 of 10ProjNet: Logged In User performed in active hospitals and related medical facilities, from their submissions--and believe that these adjustments would be to the government's benefit, as regards number of well-qualified proposals submitted.

On: Jul 31 2019.

Government Response. . no, please submit as required. On: Aug 01 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8119159 Other p. 21/205, VOLUME 1 TAB B

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Requirements for PHASE 1 - FACTOR 2: TECHNICAL/ SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE:

Solicitation states: Experience by other corporate entities or JVs not named on the Standard Form (SF) 1442 is prohibited and will not be evaluated.

We are one-half of a Joint Venture relationship that is no longer active (we were the 51%).

Are we able to show past performance for completed projects performed under that Joint Venture (JV name is a different name than what would be on the S1442)?

On: Jul 31 2019.

Government Response. . We will only evaluate the experience of the firms/individuals listed on the SF1442. On: Aug 01 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8119234 General SF 1442

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Will the owner consider providing a time extension so we can prepare the most responsive proposal?

On: Jul 31 2019.

Government Response. . No time extension will be provided at this time. On: Aug 01 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8119242 General RFP Section 00 22 16 - Factor 2

- Technical/Specialized Experience

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Please confirm that healthcare projects performed with delivery methods such as Design-Bid-Build or under a JOC will be considered relevant as a Design-Build project.

On: Jul 31 2019.

Government Response. . NOT confirmed. "Design-Bid-Build" and JOC especially are not design build projects. On: Aug 01 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8120269 Contracting PWS 15 of 64

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Please confirm that resumes for Equipment/Product Installers are not required in Phase 1 since there is no seed project at this state.

On: Aug 01 2019.

Government Response. . Confirmed On: Aug 03 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8120272 Contracting PWS 15 of 64

Page 7 of 10ProjNet: Logged In User

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

How many resumes are required for Construction Management/Field Support Staff?

On: Aug 01 2019.

Government Response. . Resume experience is not noted in this section. But activities that the Ktrs will be required to perform in all task orders that are part of this MATOC. On: Aug 03 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8121494 General RFP Due Date

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Would the Government consider extending the due date for proposals considering the date of the closing period for RFI's proximity to the turn in date? Due to the need to be physically mailed, for a Monday due date, the current timetable gives responders only 3 business DAYS to receive and incorporate answer material into their proposals -assuming answers are posted immediately and in full by 8/5 - in order to ensure timely arrival.

On: Aug 01 2019.

Government Response. . No extension granted at this time. On: Aug 03 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8121509 General RFP Due Date

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

IF the Government will consider the extension of the due date for proposals, would the Government also consider a delivery day that is later in the week than Monday to allow efficient and effective shipping that ensures timely arrival during the business week?

On: Aug 01 2019.

Government Response. . No extension granted at this time. On: Aug 03 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8121543 General RFP Factor 2 & 4 Clarification

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Are offerors intended to provide information for Factor 4 (Past Performance) that coincides with projects used in Factor 2 (Technical/Specialized Experience)?

On: Aug 01 2019.

Government Response. . It is not intended to coincide. That does not preclude that they do. On: Aug 03

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8121546 General RFP Resume Pages

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Would the Government consider allowing 2 pages per resume requested, considering the amount of information and detail requested balanced against legibility and font size requirements?

On: Aug 01 2019.

Government Response. . Page requirement will not change. On: Aug 03 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8123386 General RFI 8098833 Resumes

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Page 8 of 10ProjNet: Logged In User

Answer for RFI 8098833 states that Offeror is required to submit resumes for support personnel while Factor 4 clearly states the requirement to: "provide a resume ... for the key personnel listed in section II. A of the Performance Work Statement." Please clarify if ONLY Key Personnel Resumes are required for Phase 1 submission per RFP or if Support Personnel must now also be included in Phase 1 submission.

On: Aug 02 2019.

Government Response. . Factor 4 is "Past Performance", assuming that Factor "3" Qualifications was what was meant in the question. The requirement for key personnel will be amend to include:

"....the following support personnel listed in the same section: structural engineer, civil engineer, quality control representative, safety representative (aka site safety health officer, on-site safety manager), and project scheduler. Equipment/Product installers are not required in the Phase 1 proposal, but may be in required in future task orders." For Phase 1, the only Quality Control Representative requirement is a CQC Manager (PWS directs to the Division Specification 01 45 00.00 10). On: Aug 05 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8123395 General RFP Definition

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

To better respond to the direct criteria for evaluation, please define "Structural" as used in guidelines for Factor 2 project submission stating: "Each of the predominant infrastructure systems; HVAC, Electrical, Medical Gas, Plumbing, and Structural must be represented in at least 1 of the 5 submitted projects."

On: Aug 02 2019.

Government Response. . Please see Performance Work Statement Section II. B. Support Personnel - Structural Engineer, for project work examples under "2) Structural systems design & installation". On: Aug 05 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8123428 General RFP Resumes

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

If Attachment A will not be provided with the additional Task Order specific information requirements for support personnel resumes and, as stated per answer to RFI 8118053 "This is not part of Phase 1 solicitation" do support resumes still need to be included in Phase 1 submission?

On: Aug 02 2019.

Government Response. . Yes, please see response to question 8123386 that contains clarification of what supporting positions are expected in Phase 1. On: Aug 05 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8123452 Other RFP Factor 3 Support Roles

Resumes to be submitted

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Which Support Personnel exactly are to be included in Phase 1 submission?

On: Aug 02 2019.

Government Response. . Please see response to question 8123386 that contains clarification of what supporting positions are expected in Phase 1. On: Aug 05 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8123455 Other RFP Factor 3 Support Roles

Resumes to be submitted

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

How can offerors establish who will fill Support Personnel roles without specific task requirements to understand needed requirements and roles to answer those?

Page 9 of 10ProjNet: Logged In User

On: Aug 02 2019.

Government Response. . The response to question 8123455 provides a reduced list of support personnel in Phase 1 proposals. The corresponding paragraphs in the Performance Work Statement (Section II B.) provide the minimal requirements, examples, and/or references to standards, certifications, etc. On: Aug 05 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

Report Complete

UNCLASSIFIED\\FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

Patent 11/892,984 ProjNet property of ERDC since 2004.

Page 10 of 10ProjNet: Logged In User