Attachment X - Building 2100 Limited Asbestos Report 4-1-15_20200901.pdf

ASSESSMENT & REMEDIAL SERVICES armenv.com

1210 1st STREET SOUTH EXTENSION / COLUMBIA, SC 29209 / phone 803-783-3314 fax 803-783-2587

April 1, 2015

Noresco 1 Research Drive Suite 400 C Westborough, MA 01581 Attention: Terry O’Barr

Re: Building 2100, Fort Jackson, SC Limited Asbestos Survey ARM Project Number 09-7081-14

Dear Mr. O’Barr;

ARM Environmental Services performed a limited asbestos survey in Building 2100 located at Fort Jackson in Columbia, South Carolina. The asbestos survey was conducted to determine whether selected building materials in Building 2100 contain asbestos and to incorporate usable data from a 2012 asbestos inspection conducted by S&ME. An ARM Environmental Services, Inc. licensed asbestos inspector collected samples of the selected suspect asbestos-containing materials (ACMs), based on the probable disturbance of these materials during the renovation process.

The samples were collected on February 11, 2015 and were analyzed by Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) on a standard turnaround schedule by an independent, accredited laboratory. At least one sample of each Non-Friable Organically Bound (NOB) material such as flooring materials, was analyzed via Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) method as required by the current DHEC regulation 61-86.1. This letter is provided as a summary of the current and previous survey results and the laboratory data is attached with this report. A site plan is attached that documents the location of the samples collected at the subject site.

The following suspect asbestos-containing material (ACM) was sampled during this limited survey.

White duct mastic above suspended ceiling throughout office areas.

The analysis of this material did not detect the presence of asbestos. Also, none of the building materials sampled during the 2012 S&ME survey were found to contain asbestos.

The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and SC Department of Health and Environmental Control (DHEC) regulations define asbestos containing material as any material with greater than one percent (>1%) asbestos content. The identification of asbestos in any amount also facilitates compliance with the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) standards pertaining to worker health and safety standards.

Building 2100, Fort Jackson Limited Asbestos Survey April 1, 2015

The scope of this evaluation is limited to the sections of the structure that were accessible to ARM at the time of our evaluation. The scope of services does not include a project evaluation where destructive actions are necessary to determine if other materials are hidden or concealed behind finish materials. Additional suspect materials may be located in areas not readily accessible. Our evaluation did not include disassembling any building materials or equipment.

This report is not a bidding document. Contractors or consultants reviewing this limited sample report must draw their own conclusions regarding further investigation or remediation deemed necessary. ARM does not warrant the work of regulatory agencies, laboratories or other third parties supplying information, which may have been used in the preparation of this report. No warranty, express or implied is made.

We appreciate this opportunity to provide our services, and trust that the information provided herein is sufficient. In the event that you have any questions concerning this report, or need further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Sincerely, John M. Booth DHEC Licensed Consultant / Building Inspector #00877

Sid Havird DHEC License Consultant / Building Inspector #00258 Project Manager

Attachments: Figure 1 Site Plan Asbestos Sample Summary Tables Analytical Data Inspector’s License Site Photos 2012 S&ME Asbestos Survey Report

ATTACHMENT A

Figure 1 Site Plan

ATTACHMENT B

Asbestos Sample Summary Tables

HA

Approx.

Quantity (ft²) Area

Sample Number

Description Sample Location Lab Result Category Condition

2100-124 White Duct Mastic Throughout NAD-PLM Misc. Good 2100-125 White Duct Mastic Throughout NAD-PLM Misc. Good 2100-126 White Duct Mastic Throughout NAD-TEM Misc. Good

Table 1 - Asbestos Sample Summary Noresco

Building 2100-Fort Jackson Columbia, South Carolina

09-7081-14

HA-34 1,000 LF

HA - Homogeneous Area NAD - No Asbestos Detected PLM - Polarized Light Microscopy Chry - Chrysotile asbestos Misc - Miscellaneous Material

TEM = Transmission Electron Microscopy SM - Surfacing Material Cat I - asbestos containing packings, gaskets, asphaltic roofing products, resilient flooring, pliable mastics SF - Square Feet LF - Linear Feet

ATTACHMENT C

Analytical Data

ATTACHMENT D

Inspectors License

ATTACHMENT E

Site Photos

Photograph 1 – View of exterior of building.

Photograph 2 – View of hallway access to classrooms.

Photograph 3 – View of entrance to shop area.

Photograph 4 - View of White Duct Mastic.

ATTACHMENT F

2012 S&ME Asbestos Survey Report

S&ME, INC. / 301 Zima Park Drive / Spartanburg, SC 29301 / p 864.574.2360 / f 864.576.8730 / www.smeinc.com S&ME, INC. / 281 Fairforest Way / Greenville, SC 29607 / p 864.297.9944

April 6, 2012

US&S, Inc.

50 Grand Avenue Greenville, South Carolina 29607

Attention: Mr. Robert Reid

Reference: Asbestos Evaluation Report Building 2100 Fort Jackson Facility Fort Jackson, South Carolina S&ME Project Number: 1265-11-452 Ft Jackson Contract: W9124C-11-C-0020

Dear Mr. Ried:

S&ME, Inc. (S&ME) has completed an asbestos evaluation of the referenced structure.

The attached report presents the findings of S&ME’s asbestos evaluation. The purpose of the evaluation was to update previous asbestos reports to meet current regulations. This service was performed in general accordance with our Proposal 11-841 and our Agreement for Services AS-071.

S&ME appreciates the opportunity to provide asbestos evaluation services for this project. Please contact us at your convenience if there are questions regarding the information contained in this report.

Sincerely, S&ME, Inc.

Jeff Gurrie George Flores Industrial Hygiene Project Manager Senior Environmental Professional

Attachment: Asbestos Evaluation Report

JG/GF S:\ENVIRON\2011\1265\6511452 Ft Jackson\Buildings 2000-2499\2100\2100 Asbestos Report.doc

ASBESTOS EVALUATION REPORT

BUILDING 2100

FORT JACKSON, SOUTH CAROLINA

Ft Jackson Contract W9124C-11-C-0020

S&ME Project No. 1265-11-452

Prepared By:

281 Fairforest Way Greenville South Carolina 29607

Ph: 864-297-9944 Fax: 864-297-0462

By: Jeff Gurrie jgurrie@smeinc.com

SCDHEC Asbestos Inspector License No. 22352

Evaluation Performed on January 4, 2012 Reported on April 6, 2012

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page No.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1.0 INTRODUCTION

1.1 Purpose

1.2 Scope of Services

1.3 Limitations

1.4 Special Terms, Conditions and Reliance

2.0 EVALUATION PROCEDURES

3.0 STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION

4.0 FINDINGS

5.0 CONCLUSIONS / RECOMMENDATIONS

Appendix A: Figure 1: Building Sketch/Sample Locations Site Photographs

Appendix B: Table 1: Asbestos Results Summary

Appendix C: Laboratory Analysis

Appendix D: Asbestos Inspector License

Appendix E: Previous Inspection Report Data

Asbestos Evaluation Report S&ME Project No. 1265-11-452 Building 2100 / Fort Jackson, South Carolina April 2012

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

S&ME, Inc. (S&ME) has updated the asbestos evaluation of Building 2100 located at the Fort Jackson Facility in Fort Jackson, South Carolina. This Executive Summary is intended as an overview for the convenience of the reader. The complete report must be reviewed in its entirety prior to making decisions regarding this site.

S&ME has updated the previous asbestos evaluation of Building 2100. A total of 46 additional bulk samples of suspect asbestos-containing materials were collected from the structure. The bulk samples were analyzed for asbestos by Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM). In accordance with South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control (SCDHEC) Asbestos Regulation 61-86.1, a representative sample of each non-friable, organically bound material which tested negative for asbestos by PLM were further analyzed by Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM).

Building 2100 is an approximate 36,600 square foot building on a concrete slab on grade foundation constructed with masonry walls and a metal roof. The HVAC ducts are insulated with fiberglass with white mastic on the seams. Piping is insulated with fiberglass. Suspect miscellaneous materials include floor tile, ceiling tile, vinyl cove base mastic, and mastics. Suspect surfacing material consists of drywall joint compound and fireproofing. No suspect thermal system insulation (TSI) was observed at the time of our evaluation. Non-suspect building materials include metal roof and wall system, ceramic tiles, fiberglass insulation, concrete, and rubberized or silicone caulking. It appeared as if flooring materials had been replaced and the chiller unit updated since the last evaluation (2007).

Figures 1 and 2, Building Sketch/Sample Locations and site photographs are provided in Appendix A. Table 1, Asbestos Results Summary in Appendix B presents a summary of the suspect materials, material friability, condition, potential for disturbance, approximate quantity, and asbestos analysis of the samples collected or presumed to contain asbestos.

No asbestos was detected in the samples of suspect materials collected.

The black 12-inch floor tile could not be sampled due to its location in the center of the hallways. This material should be sampled prior to disturbance.

1.0 INTRODUCTION

1.1 Purpose

S&ME was retained to perform an update to a previous asbestos evaluation of Building 2100 located at Fort Jackson in South Carolina. The information presented in the previous evaluation report was updated in order to be compliant with Section VI.A.6 of South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control (SCDHEC) Asbestos Regulation 61-86.1. S&ME performed the evaluation on January 4, 2012.

1.2 Scope of Services

The scope of this evaluation is limited to the sections of the structure that were accessible to S&ME at the time of our evaluation. The scope of our services does not include a pre-project evaluation where destructive actions are necessary to determine if other materials are concealed behind finish materials. Additional suspect materials may be located in areas not readily accessible. For example, mastics located in between exterior brick and structural block, in confined spaces, materials located underground, or materials covered by newer materials. This evaluation did not include disassembling any building materials or equipment.

1.3 Limitations

This report has been prepared in accordance with generally accepted practice for specific application to this project. The conclusions and/or recommendations contained in this report are based on our understanding of the applicable standards at the time this report was prepared. No other warranty, express or implied, is made.

The findings of the asbestos evaluation are based largely on visual observations. The findings do not warrant that all asbestos-containing materials have been identified;

asbestos-containing materials could be present in areas not readily accessible to observation. In addition, the actual locations and quantities of materials determined to contain asbestos may vary from those herein. Apparent homogeneous sampling areas may vary in actual asbestos content due to previous renovations, maintenance, or related operations.

As part of our evaluation, S&ME has relied on previous asbestos reports prepared by Geo-Systems Design & Testing, Inc. provided to us by Fort Jackson. Data presented in the previous reports were utilized, in part, by S&ME when performing our update and in generating the conclusions and recommendations presented herein. We have made the fundamental assumption that this historical data is accurate and reliable and that the samples were collected and analyzed in accordance with the applicable Federal and State regulations in force at the time of sample collection; however, as S&ME was not responsible for performing the prior building evaluations we, therefore, make no claim as to the accuracy of the findings and conclusions presented therein and we will not be liable for errors in, or resulting from the use of, these reports.

If additional suspect materials are found, our firm should be notified so that our findings can be reviewed for modification or verification.

1.4 Special Terms, Conditions and Reliance

This assessment was performed on behalf of US&S for the exclusive use of Fort Jackson.

No other company, entity, or person shall have any rights with regard to S&ME’s contract with US&S, including but not limited to indemnification by S&ME, or any rights of reliance on the findings, conclusions and recommendations of this or any subsequent reports issued by S&ME regarding the referenced site. The results presented in this report are indicative of conditions only during the time of the evaluation and of the specific areas referenced. The information provided in this report should not be used as a bidding document.

2.0 EVALUATION PROCEDURES

The asbestos evaluation process focused on reviewing previous reports and attempted to verify the location, quantity, and condition of the homogeneous areas of suspect materials identified therein; homogeneous areas are defined as areas which are uniform by color, texture, construction and/or application date, and general appearance. Previous inspection reports were reviewed for compliance with current SCDHEC regulations and additional samples of suspect materials were collected and analyzed for asbestos when necessary.

Bulk sampling was conducted by Mr. Jeff Gurrie, a South Carolina licensed asbestos inspector. A copy of Mr. Gurrie’s license is provided in Appendix D. Each sample was extracted with a pre-cleaned sampling instrument then placed in a plastic bag. Each bag was numbered and data (including sample number, sample location, type of suspect material, and material condition) was recorded. The bulk samples were submitted through chain-of-custody procedures to SAI’s asbestos laboratory in Greensboro, North Carolina for analysis of asbestos type and content by Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) and analysis of asbestos type and content by Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM).

This laboratory is accredited by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP).

The samples were analyzed by a trained microscopist utilizing PLM coupled with dispersion staining in accordance with EPA Method 600/R-93/116 and 600/M4-82-020.

The USEPA recognizes a material as containing asbestos if an asbestos content of greater than one percent (>1%) is detected in a representative sample. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) recognizes a material as containing asbestos if any asbestos, regardless of content, is detected in a representative sample.

In accordance with SCDHEC Regulation 61-86.1, additional sample analysis, if necessary, was performed on one (1) representative sample in each homogeneous group of an organically bound material which did not contain asbestos as tested by the PLM method. The additional analysis was performed by TEM in accordance with Chatfield Method SOP 1988-02 Rev. 1. TEM can identify asbestos when fiber sizes are extremely small or if they are bound in a resinous material, for example, floor tile, mastic or asphaltic roofing.

3.0 STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION

Building 2100 is an approximate 36,600 square foot building on a concrete slab on grade foundation constructed with masonry walls and a metal roof. The HVAC ducts are insulated with fiberglass with white mastic on the seams. Piping is insulated with fiberglass. Suspect miscellaneous materials include floor tile, ceiling tile, vinyl cove base mastic, and mastics. Suspect surfacing material consists of drywall joint compound and fireproofing. No suspect thermal system insulation (TSI) was observed at the time of our evaluation. Non-suspect building materials include metal roof and wall system, ceramic tiles, fiberglass insulation, concrete, and rubberized or silicone caulking. It appeared as if flooring materials had been replaced and the chiller unit updated since the last evaluation (2007).

Figures 1 and 2 in Appendix A provide a general building sketch. Site photographs are also provided.

4.0 FINDINGS

A total of 46 additional bulk samples of suspect asbestos-containing materials were collected from the structure. Figure 1 in Appendix A provides a general building sketch with sample locations. S&ME has also included previous sampling data from other firms where applicable. Site photographs are also provided. Sample descriptions, location, and analytical results are listed in Table 1, Asbestos Results Summary Table in Appendix B.

Laboratory sample analysis and chain-of-custody forms for the suspect samples collected are included in the Appendix C. Additionally, copies of previous reports provided to, and utilized by, S&ME as part of this update are included in Appendix E.

No asbestos was detected in the samples of suspect materials collected.

The black 12-inch floor tile could not be sampled due to its location in the center of the hallways. This material should be sampled prior to disturbance.

5.0 CONCLUSIONS / RECOMMENDATIONS

No asbestos was detected in the suspect materials collected.

The black 12-inch floor tile could not be sampled due to its location in the center of the hallways. This material should be sampled prior to disturbance.

The scope of this evaluation is limited to the sections of the structure that were accessible to S&ME at the time of our evaluation. The scope of our services does not include a pre-project evaluation where destructive actions are necessary to determine if other materials are concealed behind finish materials. Additional suspect materials may be located in areas not readily accessible. For example, mastics located in between exterior brick and structural block, in confined spaces, materials located underground, or materials covered by newer materials. This evaluation did not include disassembling any building materials or equipment. If additional suspect materials are discovered during maintenance, renovation, or demolition activities, bulk samples must be collected and analyzed for asbestos content prior to continuation of work.

APPENDIX A

Building Sketch/Sample Locations

FIGURE NO.

1DRAWN BY: JAG

S&ME Project No. 1265-11-452

CHECKED BY: GKF Building 2100 Ft. Jackson, South Carolina

SCALE: NTS General Building Sketch

DATE: 2/11/2012

H

H

I1 I2 I3

D

D

D

G

A 1

C

C

NTS General Building Sketch

DATE: 2/11/2012 S&ME Project No. 1265-11-452

FIGURE NO.

CHECKED BY: GKF Building 2100 2DRAWN BY: JAG Ft. Jackson, South Carolina

SCALE:

B

F

D

J3

G 1 G

F

J2

A

J1

A

B

H

E

F

D

C

E

F

E 2 F

F

F

Building 2100 Fort Jackson, South Carolina

S&ME Project # 1265-11-452

Taken by: JAG Date Taken: 1/4/2012

1 Building 2100 2 Ceiling tile with deep birdwing pattern

3 Ceiling tile with shallow birdwing pattern 4 White mastic on ducts

5 Fireproofing 6 Red mastic on ducts

7 Base cove mastic 8 White mastic on piping

9 Black mastic on exterior chiller piping 10 12-Inch white floor tile –gray accent w/ black mastic

No Photo

11 Black floor tile in center of hallways not sampled 12

APPENDIX B

Asbestos Results Summary

2100-A-1 PLM

2100-A-2 PLM

2100-A-3 PLM

2100-B-1 PLM

2100-B-2 PLM

2100-B-3 PLM

2100-C-1 PLM

2100-C-2 PLM

2100-C-3 TEM

2100-D-1 PLM

2100-D-2 PLM

2100-D-3 PLM

2100-D-4 PLM

2100-D-5 PLM

2100-E-1 PLM

2100-E-2 PLM

2100-E-3 TEM

2100-F-1 PLM

2100-F-2 PLM

2100-F-3 PLM

2100-F-4 PLM

2100-F-5 PLM

2100-F-6 PLM

2100-F-7 PLM

2100-G-1 PLM

2100-G-2 PLM

2100-G-3 TEM

NAD Base Cove Mastic G Miscellaneous

LPD

1,200

3,800

Non-Friable

SF

SF

SF

SFNAD Red Mastic on Ducts E Miscellaneous Non-Friable Good

Good LPD

NAD Spray-Applied Fireproofing D Surfacing Friable Good PD

Analytical Results

NAD White Mastic on Ducts C Miscellaneous

Sample Description Homogeneous

Area Classification

Friable / Non-Friable

TABLE 1

ASBESTOS RESULTS SUMMARY

BUILDING 2100

FT. JACKSON

Sample Number

Analysis Method

Current Condition

Potential for Disturbance

Estimated Quantity

NAD

2'x'2 Ceiling Tile Light Birdwing

Pattern (patched tile) B Miscellaneous Friable Good PD

S&ME PROJECT NO. 1265-11-452

NAD

2'X2' Ceiling Tile Deep Birdwing

Pattern (main tile) A Miscellaneous Friable Good PD 50,000 SF

>5,000 SF

Non-Friable Good LPD 5,000

Drywall - NAD Joint Compound - NAD

Drywall & Joint Compound F Surfacing Friable Good PD

LF

Analytical Results Sample Description Homogeneous

Area Classification

Friable / Non-Friable

TABLE 1

ASBESTOS RESULTS SUMMARY

BUILDING 2100

FT. JACKSON

Sample Number

Analysis Method

Current Condition

Potential for Disturbance

Estimated Quantity

S&ME PROJECT NO. 1265-11-452

2100-H-1 PLM

2100-H-2 PLM

2100-H-3 TEM

2100-I-1 PLM

2100-I-2 PLM

2100-I-3 TEM

2100-J-1 PLM

2100-J-2 PLM

2100-J-3 TEM

NAD - No Asbestos Detected PLM - Polarized Light Microscopy TEM - Transmission Electron Microscopy

NOTE: Quantities listed above are estimates to be used for inspection purposes only. Quantities should be field verified for all other uses. Approximate sample locations are noted on Figures 1 & 2.

LPD - Low potential for disturbance PD - Potential for disturbance PSD - Potential of significant disturbance

SF - square feet LF - linear feet CF - cubic feet

Good LPD SF

NAD

Black Mastic on Exterior Chiller

Piping I Miscellaneous

NAD White Mastic on Piping H Miscellaneous Non-Friable

12-Inch White Floor Tile - Gray Accent w/ Black Mastic

J Miscellaneous Non-Friable Good PD

20,000

1,100--- 12-Inch Black Floor Tile in Center of Hallway K Miscellaneous

Non-Friable Good SF

SF

SFNot Sampled --- Non-Friable Good PD

LPD

Tile - NAD Mastic - NAD

APPENDIX C

Laboratory Analysis Results

Lab Order ID: 1200252

Project: 1265-11-452 / Ft Jackson - Building

Date Received: 1/9/2012

Date Reported: 1/13/2012

Sample ID

Lab Sample ID

Description

Lab Notes Asbestos

Fibrous Components

Non-Fibrous Components

Attributes

Treatment

Bulk Asbestos Analysis By Polarized Light Microscopy

EPA Method: 600/R-93/116 and 600/M4-82-020

Attn: Jeff Gurrie Analysis ID: 1200252PLM

Customer: S&ME 281 Fairforest Way Greenville, SC 29607

2100-A-1 2x2 ceiling tile White Non Fibrous Homogeneous

Teased1200252PLM_1

40% 40%

Cellulose Fiber Glass

20% Other

None Detected

2100-A-2 2x2 ceiling tile White Non Fibrous Homogeneous

Teased1200252PLM_2

40% 40%

Cellulose Fiber Glass

20% Other

None Detected

2100-A-3 2x2 ceiling tile White Non Fibrous Homogeneous

Teased1200252PLM_3

40% 40%

Cellulose Fiber Glass

20% Other

None Detected

2100-B-1 2x2 ceiling tile (patched) White Non Fibrous Homogeneous

Teased1200252PLM_4

40% 40%

Cellulose Fiber Glass

20% Other

None Detected

2100-B-2 2x2 ceiling tile (patched) White Non Fibrous Homogeneous

Teased1200252PLM_5

40% 40%

Cellulose Fiber Glass

20% Other

None Detected

2100-B-3 2x2 ceiling tile (patched) White Non Fibrous Homogeneous

Teased1200252PLM_6

40% 40%

Cellulose Fiber Glass

20% Other

None Detected

2100-C-1 White mastic on duct White Non Fibrous Homogeneous

Dissolved1200252PLM_7

100% Other

None Detected

2100-C-2 White mastic on duct White Non Fibrous Homogeneous

Dissolved1200252PLM_8

100% Other

None Detected

Nathaniel Durham, MS or Approved SignatoryAnalyst

Scientific Analytical Institute, Inc. 302-L Pomona Dr. Greensboro, NC 27407 (336) 292-3888

Disclaimer: Due to the nature of the EPA 600 method, asbestos may not be detected in samples containing low levels of asbestos. We strongly recommended that analysis of floor tiles, vermiculite, and/or heterogeneous soil samples be conducted by TEM for confirmation of “None Detected” by PLM. This report relates only to the samples tested and may not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of SAI. This report may not be used by the client to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U.S. government. Estimated MDL is 0.1%.

Bart Huber (39)

Date Received: 1/9/2012

Date Reported: 1/13/2012

Sample ID

Lab Sample ID

Description

Lab Notes Asbestos

Fibrous Components

Non-Fibrous Components

Attributes

Treatment

Bulk Asbestos Analysis By Polarized Light Microscopy

EPA Method: 600/R-93/116 and 600/M4-82-020

Attn: Jeff Gurrie Analysis ID: 1200252PLM

Customer: S&ME 281 Fairforest Way Greenville, SC 29607

2100-D-1 Spray applied fire proofing Gray Non Fibrous Homogeneous

Crushed1200252PLM_9

10% Cellulose 90% Other

None Detected

2100-D-2 Spray applied fire proofing Gray Non Fibrous Homogeneous

Crushed1200252PLM_10

10% Cellulose 90% Other

None Detected

2100-D-3 Spray applied fire proofing Gray Non Fibrous Homogeneous

Crushed1200252PLM_11

10% Cellulose 90% Other

None Detected

2100-D-4 Spray applied fire proofing Gray Non Fibrous Homogeneous

Crushed1200252PLM_12

10% Cellulose 90% Other

None Detected

2100-D-5 Spray applied fire proofing

1200252PLM_13

Not Submitted

2100-E-1 Red mastic on duct Red Non Fibrous Homogeneous

Dissolved1200252PLM_14

100% Other

None Detected

2100-E-2 Red mastic on duct Red Non Fibrous Homogeneous

Dissolved1200252PLM_15

100% Other

None Detected

2100-F-1 - A Drywall joint compound drywall

Brown, White Non Fibrous Heterogeneous

Crushed1200252PLM_16

12% Cellulose 88% Other

None Detected

Nathaniel Durham, MS or Approved SignatoryAnalyst

Scientific Analytical Institute, Inc. 302-L Pomona Dr. Greensboro, NC 27407 (336) 292-3888

Disclaimer: Due to the nature of the EPA 600 method, asbestos may not be detected in samples containing low levels of asbestos. We strongly recommended that analysis of floor tiles, vermiculite, and/or heterogeneous soil samples be conducted by TEM for confirmation of “None Detected” by PLM. This report relates only to the samples tested and may not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of SAI. This report may not be used by the client to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U.S. government. Estimated MDL is 0.1%.

Date Received: 1/9/2012

Date Reported: 1/13/2012

Sample ID

Lab Sample ID

Description

Lab Notes Asbestos

Fibrous Components

Non-Fibrous Components

Attributes

Treatment

Bulk Asbestos Analysis By Polarized Light Microscopy

EPA Method: 600/R-93/116 and 600/M4-82-020

Attn: Jeff Gurrie Analysis ID: 1200252PLM

Customer: S&ME 281 Fairforest Way Greenville, SC 29607

2100-F-1 - B Drywall joint compound joint compound

White Non Fibrous Homogeneous

Crushed1200252PLM_31

100% Other

None Detected

2100-F-2 - A Drywall joint compound drywall

Brown, White Non Fibrous Heterogeneous

Crushed1200252PLM_17

12% Cellulose 88% Other

None Detected

2100-F-2 - B Drywall joint compound joint compound

White Non Fibrous Homogeneous

Crushed1200252PLM_32

100% Other

None Detected

2100-F-3 - A Drywall joint compound drywall

Brown, White Non Fibrous Heterogeneous

Crushed1200252PLM_18

12% Cellulose 88% Other

None Detected

2100-F-3 - B Drywall joint compound joint compound

White Non Fibrous Homogeneous

Crushed1200252PLM_33

100% Other

None Detected

2100-F-4 - A Drywall joint compound drywall

Brown, White Non Fibrous Heterogeneous

Crushed1200252PLM_19

12% Cellulose 88% Other

None Detected

2100-F-4 - B Drywall joint compound joint compound

White Non Fibrous Homogeneous

Crushed1200252PLM_34

100% Other

None Detected

2100-F-5 - A Drywall joint compound drywall

Brown, White Non Fibrous Heterogeneous

Crushed1200252PLM_20

12% Cellulose 88% Other

None Detected

Nathaniel Durham, MS or Approved SignatoryAnalyst

Scientific Analytical Institute, Inc. 302-L Pomona Dr. Greensboro, NC 27407 (336) 292-3888

Disclaimer: Due to the nature of the EPA 600 method, asbestos may not be detected in samples containing low levels of asbestos. We strongly recommended that analysis of floor tiles, vermiculite, and/or heterogeneous soil samples be conducted by TEM for confirmation of “None Detected” by PLM. This report relates only to the samples tested and may not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of SAI. This report may not be used by the client to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U.S. government. Estimated MDL is 0.1%.

Date Received: 1/9/2012

Date Reported: 1/13/2012

Sample ID

Lab Sample ID

Description

Lab Notes Asbestos

Fibrous Components

Non-Fibrous Components

Attributes

Treatment

Bulk Asbestos Analysis By Polarized Light Microscopy

EPA Method: 600/R-93/116 and 600/M4-82-020

Attn: Jeff Gurrie Analysis ID: 1200252PLM

Customer: S&ME 281 Fairforest Way Greenville, SC 29607

2100-F-5 - B Drywall joint compound joint compound

White Non Fibrous Homogeneous

Crushed1200252PLM_35

100% Other

None Detected

2100-F-6 - A Drywall joint compound drywall

Brown, White Non Fibrous Heterogeneous

Crushed1200252PLM_21

12% Cellulose 88% Other

None Detected

2100-F-6 - B Drywall joint compound joint compound

White Non Fibrous Homogeneous

Crushed1200252PLM_36

100% Other

None Detected

2100-F-7 - A Drywall joint compound drywall

Brown, White Non Fibrous Heterogeneous

Crushed1200252PLM_22

12% Cellulose 88% Other

None Detected

2100-F-7 - B Drywall joint compound joint compound

White Non Fibrous Homogeneous

Crushed1200252PLM_37

100% Other

None Detected

2100-G-1 Base cove mastic Cream Non Fibrous Homogeneous

Dissolved1200252PLM_23

100% Other

None Detected

2100-G-2 Base cove mastic Cream Non Fibrous Homogeneous

Dissolved1200252PLM_24

100% Other

None Detected

2100-H-1 White mastic on piping White Non Fibrous Homogeneous

Dissolved1200252PLM_25

100% Other

None Detected

Nathaniel Durham, MS or Approved SignatoryAnalyst

Scientific Analytical Institute, Inc. 302-L Pomona Dr. Greensboro, NC 27407 (336) 292-3888

Disclaimer: Due to the nature of the EPA 600 method, asbestos may not be detected in samples containing low levels of asbestos. We strongly recommended that analysis of floor tiles, vermiculite, and/or heterogeneous soil samples be conducted by TEM for confirmation of “None Detected” by PLM. This report relates only to the samples tested and may not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of SAI. This report may not be used by the client to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U.S. government. Estimated MDL is 0.1%.

Date Received: 1/9/2012

Date Reported: 1/13/2012

Sample ID

Lab Sample ID

Description

Lab Notes Asbestos

Fibrous Components

Non-Fibrous Components

Attributes

Treatment

Bulk Asbestos Analysis By Polarized Light Microscopy

EPA Method: 600/R-93/116 and 600/M4-82-020

Attn: Jeff Gurrie Analysis ID: 1200252PLM

Customer: S&ME 281 Fairforest Way Greenville, SC 29607

2100-H-2 White mastic on piping White Non Fibrous Homogeneous

Dissolved1200252PLM_26

100% Other

None Detected

2100-I-1 Black mastic on ext piping of chiller

Black Non Fibrous Heterogeneous

Dissolved1200252PLM_27

10% Cellulose 90% Other

None Detected

2100-I-2 Black mastic on ext piping of chiller

Black Non Fibrous Heterogeneous

Dissolved1200252PLM_28

10% Cellulose 90% Other

None Detected

2100-J-1 - A 12" white floor tile w/ gray specks tile

White Non Fibrous Homogeneous

Dissolved1200252PLM_29

100% Other

None Detected

2100-J-1 - B 12" white floor tile w/ gray specks mastic

Black Non Fibrous Homogeneous

Dissolved1200252PLM_38

3% Cellulose 97% Other

None Detected

2100-J-2 - A 12" white floor tile w/ gray specks tile

White Non Fibrous Homogeneous

Dissolved1200252PLM_30

100% Other

None Detected

2100-J-2 - B 12" white floor tile w/ gray specks mastic

Black Non Fibrous Homogeneous

Dissolved1200252PLM_39

3% Cellulose 97% Other

None Detected

Nathaniel Durham, MS or Approved SignatoryAnalyst

Scientific Analytical Institute, Inc. 302-L Pomona Dr. Greensboro, NC 27407 (336) 292-3888

Disclaimer: Due to the nature of the EPA 600 method, asbestos may not be detected in samples containing low levels of asbestos. We strongly recommended that analysis of floor tiles, vermiculite, and/or heterogeneous soil samples be conducted by TEM for confirmation of “None Detected” by PLM. This report relates only to the samples tested and may not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of SAI. This report may not be used by the client to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U.S. government. Estimated MDL is 0.1%.

Scientific Analytical Institute 302-L Pomona Dr. Greensboro, NC 21401

Phone: 336.292.3888 Fax: 336.292.33J3 www.sailab.comlab((JJsallab.com

Company: S&ME, Inc. Contact: Jeff Gurrie

Address: 281 Fairforest Way PhoneD:

Greenville, SC 29607 FaxD:

Email [!]:jgurrie@smeinc.com

Contact: 3 Hours

Address: 6 Hours

12 Hours

24 Hours

Positive stop

PLM Point Count

PCM NIOSH 7400

TEM AHERA

TEM Levell!

TEM NIOSH 7402

TEM Bulk Qualitative

TEM Bulk Chatfield

TEM Bulk Quantitative

TEM Wipe ASTM 06480-99

TEM Microvac ASTM 05755-0

TEM Water EPA 100.2

Other:

• D D DPO Number:

DProjeet~am~umber: 1265-11-452 / Ft. Jackson - Building Qt/~

:w..r~:mi)~ . :-~~:~

I

SampleID# DeseriptioDlLocatioD VolumtlAQa. ;C~..mentl ";;;J - /J~ I J-~1- tJ£/t. Jx..Y..y "t<.-E j/ A-.? tJI.]';'job?'\. £" ~~ P Il'~ ,.!2X:J... J) P ~-, I{)ta U', 1...1AX;. T t J...,E L:fJA- fCJ/;t;?>" V A-:t- I\. P...

&.-j ,t, "1·'/ 11..-1 VH i Ie M,A~It, L ou'tnU:...T r;.;

/J.,-1--

I«.. f..J a-3 1\

'U--l ~WfA.\.f -APPle;» P:; /lIE Plop I=IJiG t!

2.

.s

,""' ..6 i t:

I t:

\ (-1

T,O",ta,1,.,#,O.f'Sl·aml..n,.~,.,Pa.,.,;:,.S,"",.,a-"e!J.

Page-'-of~ Scientific Analytical Institute ' ~~

'1Ifa.twt r www.sailab.comlab((JJsallab.com

302-L Pomona Dr. Greensboro, NC 27407 Phone: 336.292.3888 Fax: 336.292.3313

6,/ www.sailab.com/abOsallab.com

'mil.·:; ,;;:' .... .../' ." '.'" ?;;;~:~, 7,':

reD- £-1 R.tW 111 Asr {L 42A1 ;:P t.J.{J T

'e·~?~ " ~t ;t)~" I.JJJJ...L, :\OiNi t7A~d J '.h r-.J \ j: .~ I J::..4 c ,,<.--"

":"0 F-/ &-1 fl.J.sc; (11)11& MJ..<"'{r 6-7 I <3"...-.5 l fI-; Ii)'"1'1'£ J'lIIA~TlC!.. "JJ ;JIjJ /Uc;, H~;J,- 1 J-I-~ J

1-L ~J.-l1tLK. hlA611L IJA,) IZxT iJli1ltJ &' :r.~;L I 6 P t1dJ JJ-.t-.c.

:r...~ I ~I'-( I!).. II ILJ t-< I r£. r- L-p~ 12.. T /t:r II V....tI<\y ,~ S-;z... l .:Sp'et!7c:~ c'"'f-- S (

~ ~ J" 11/1 n, '" 'tC-k'JII"';;:';

/I F' , . ......-.(t , l

1£.""1- I'C

.. ''I;;'" ~ll~i,~:~i!~

-r-;-"., P P f!

~j f../ t" '1''f,; ~ R.

1'

1" .::> P

I~ Q f.:.J

Page ;z.. of~ Scienti fic Analytical Institute

Project: 1265-11-452/Ft. Jackson -Building

Client: S&ME 281 Fairforest Way Greenville, SC 29607

Sample ID

Lab Sample ID

Description

Lab Notes Organic Acid Sol. Asbestos

Bulk Asbestos Analysis by Transmission Electron Microscopy

Semi-Quantitative Chatfield SOP 1988-02 Rev. 1

Lab Order ID: 1200262

Date Received: 1/9/2012

Date Reported: 1/12/2012

Analysis ID: 1200262_TBS Attn: Jeff Gurrie

(Wt. %) (Wt. %) (Wt. %)

LCL-UCL

(Wt. %)

2100-C-3 White mastic on duct

46% -% None Detected

1200262TBS_1

2100-E-3 Red mastic on duct

61% -% None Detected

1200262TBS_2

2100-G-3 Base cove mastic

47% -% None Detected

1200262TBS_3

2100-H-3 White mastic on piping

40.% -% None Detected

1200262TBS_4

2100-I-3 Black mastic on ext piping of chiller

82% -% None Detected

1200262TBS_5

2100-J-3A 12" white floor tile w/gray specks tile

10.% 89% None Detected

1200262TBS_6

2100-J-3B 12" white floor tile w/gray specks mastic

44% 27% None Detected

1200262TBS_7

Approved SignatoryAnalyst

Scientific Analytical Institute, Inc. 302-L Pomona Dr. Greensboro, NC 27407 (336) 292-3888

Matt Thomas (7)

Lab Order ID: 1204851

Date Received: 3/21/2012

Date Reported: 3/21/2012

Sample ID

Lab Sample ID

Description

Lab Notes Asbestos

Fibrous Components

Non-Fibrous Components

Attributes

Treatment

Bulk Asbestos Analysis By Polarized Light Microscopy

EPA Method: 600/R-93/116 and 600/M4-82-020

Attn: Jeff Gurrie Analysis ID: 1204851PLM

Customer: S&ME 281 Fairforest Way Greenville, SC 29607

D5 Fireproofing Gray Fibrous Heterogeneous

Teased1204851PLM_1

15% Cellulose 85% Other

None Detected

Nathaniel Durham, MS or Approved SignatoryAnalyst

Scientific Analytical Institute, Inc. 302-L Pomona Dr. Greensboro, NC 27407 (336) 292-3888

Disclaimer: Due to the nature of the EPA 600 method, asbestos may not be detected in samples containing low levels of asbestos. We strongly recommended that analysis of floor tiles, vermiculite, and/or heterogeneous soil samples be conducted by TEM for confirmation of “None Detected” by PLM. This report relates only to the samples tested and may not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of SAI. This report may not be used by the client to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U.S. government. Estimated MDL is 0.1%.

Dorlos Ammerman (1)

APPENDIX D

Asbestos Inspector License

APPENDIX E

Previous Asbestos Report Data

S&ME, INC. / 301 Zima Park Drive / Spartanburg, SC 29301 / p 864.574.2360 / f 864.576.8730 / www.smeinc.com S&ME, INC. / 281 Fairforest Way / Greenville, SC 29607 / p 864.297.9944

April 9, 2012

US&S, Inc.

50 Grand Avenue Greenville, South Carolina 29607

Attention: Mr. Robert Ried

Reference: Asbestos Evaluation Report Building 2600 Fort Jackson Facility Fort Jackson, South Carolina S&ME Project Number: 1265-11-452 Ft Jackson Contract: W9124C-11-C-0020

Dear Mr. Ried:

S&ME, Inc. (S&ME) has completed an asbestos evaluation of the referenced structure.

The attached report presents the findings of S&ME’s asbestos evaluation. The purpose of the evaluation was to update previous asbestos reports to meet current regulations. This service was performed in general accordance with our Proposal 11-841 and our Agreement for Services AS-071.

S&ME appreciates the opportunity to provide asbestos evaluation services for this project. Please contact us at your convenience if there are questions regarding the information contained in this report.

Sincerely, S&ME, Inc.

Jeff Gurrie George Flores Industrial Hygiene Project Manager Senior Environmental Professional

Attachment: Asbestos Evaluation Report

JG/GF S:\ENVIRON\2011\1265\6511452 Ft Jackson\Buildings 2500-2999\2600\2600 Asbestos Report.docx

ASBESTOS EVALUATION REPORT

BUILDING 2600

FORT JACKSON, SOUTH CAROLINA

Ft Jackson Contract W9124C-11-C-0020

S&ME Project No. 1265-11-452

Prepared By:

281 Fairforest Way Greenville South Carolina 29607

Ph: 864-297-9944 Fax: 864-297-0462

By: Jeff Gurrie jgurrie@smeinc.com

SCDHEC Asbestos Inspector License No. 22352

Evaluation Performed on January 24, 2012 Reported on April 9, 2012

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page No.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1.0 INTRODUCTION

1.1 Purpose

1.2 Scope of Services

1.3 Limitations

1.4 Special Terms, Conditions and Reliance

2.0 EVALUATION PROCEDURES

3.0 STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION

4.0 FINDINGS

5.0 CONCLUSIONS / RECOMMENDATIONS

Appendix A: Figure 1: Building Sketch/Sample Locations

Appendix B: Table 1: Asbestos Results Summary

Appendix C: Laboratory Analysis

Appendix D: Asbestos Inspector License

Appendix E: Previous Inspection Report Data

Building 2600 / Fort Jackson, South Carolina April 2012

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

S&ME, Inc. (S&ME) has updated the asbestos evaluation of Building 2600 located at the Fort Jackson Facility in Fort Jackson, South Carolina. This Executive Summary is intended as an overview for the convenience of the reader. The complete report must be reviewed in its entirety prior to making decisions regarding this site.

S&ME has updated the previous asbestos evaluation of Building 2600. A total of 22 additional bulk sample layers of suspect asbestos-containing materials were collected from the structure. The bulk samples were analyzed for asbestos by Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM). In accordance with South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control (SCDHEC) Asbestos Regulation 61-86.1, a representative sample of each non-friable, organically bound material which tested negative for asbestos by PLM were further analyzed by Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM).

Building 2600 is an approximate 12,000 square foot two-story slab-on-grade masonry building constructed in approximately 1993. This building is used as an office. Exterior finishes are brick with a metal roof. The HVAC ducts are insulated with fiberglass with various mastics. Piping is insulated with fiberglass with white mastic at the seams.

Suspect miscellaneous materials include floor tile, vinyl cove base mastic, ceiling tile, drywall, and various mastics. Suspect surfacing material consists of drywall joint compound and spray-applied fireproofing. No suspect thermal system insulation (TSI) was observed at the time of our evaluation. Non-suspect building materials include fiberglass insulation, concrete, metal roofing, and rubberized or silicone caulking.

Figures 1 and 2, Building Sketch/Sample Locations and site photographs are provided in Appendix A. Table 1, Asbestos Results Summary in Appendix B presents a summary of the suspect materials, material friability, condition, potential for disturbance, approximate quantity, and asbestos analysis of the samples collected or presumed to contain asbestos.

No asbestos was detected in the suspect building materials tested.

1.0 INTRODUCTION

1.1 Purpose

S&ME was retained to perform an update to a previous asbestos evaluation of Building 2600 located at Fort Jackson in South Carolina. The information presented in the previous evaluation report was updated in order to be compliant with Section VI.A.6 of South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control (SCDHEC) Asbestos Regulation 61-86.1. S&ME performed the evaluation on January 24, 2012.

1.2 Scope of Services

The scope of this evaluation is limited to the sections of the structure that were accessible to S&ME at the time of our evaluation. The scope of our services does not include a pre-project evaluation where destructive actions are necessary to determine if other materials are concealed behind finish materials. Additional suspect materials may be located in areas not readily accessible. For example, mastics located in between exterior brick and structural block, materials in confined spaces, materials located underground, or materials covered by newer materials. This evaluation did not include disassembling any building materials or equipment.

1.3 Limitations

This report has been prepared in accordance with generally accepted practice for specific application to this project. The conclusions and/or recommendations contained in this report are based on our understanding of the applicable standards at the time this report was prepared. No other warranty, express or implied, is made.

The findings of the asbestos evaluation are based largely on visual observations. The findings do not warrant that all asbestos-containing materials have been identified;

asbestos-containing materials could be present in areas not readily accessible to observation. In addition, the actual locations and quantities of materials determined to contain asbestos may vary from those herein. Apparent homogeneous sampling areas may vary in actual asbestos content due to previous renovations, maintenance, or related operations.

As part of our evaluation, S&ME has relied on previous asbestos reports prepared by Hub Testing Laboratory, Inc. provided to us by Fort Jackson. Data presented in the previous reports were utilized, in part, by S&ME when performing our update and in generating the conclusions and recommendations presented herein. We have made the fundamental assumption that this historical data is accurate and reliable and that the samples were collected and analyzed in accordance with the applicable Federal and State regulations in force at the time of sample collection; however, as S&ME was not responsible for performing the prior building evaluations we, therefore, make no claim as to the accuracy of the findings and conclusions presented therein and we will not be liable for errors in, or resulting from the use of, these reports.

If additional suspect materials are found, our firm should be notified so that our findings can be reviewed for modification or verification.

1.4 Special Terms, Conditions and Reliance

This assessment was performed on behalf of US&S for the exclusive use of Fort Jackson.

No other company, entity, or person shall have any rights with regard to S&ME’s contract with US&S, including but not limited to indemnification by S&ME, or any rights of reliance on the findings, conclusions and recommendations of this or any subsequent reports issued by S&ME regarding the referenced site. The results presented in this report are indicative of conditions only during the time of the evaluation and of the specific areas referenced. The information provided in this report should not be used as a bidding document.

2.0 EVALUATION PROCEDURES

The asbestos evaluation process focused on reviewing previous reports and attempted to verify the location, quantity, and condition of the homogeneous areas of suspect materials identified therein; homogeneous areas are defined as areas which are uniform by color, texture, construction and/or application date, and general appearance. Previous inspection reports were reviewed for compliance with current SCDHEC regulations and additional samples of suspect materials were collected and analyzed for asbestos when necessary.

Bulk sampling was conducted by Mr. Jeff Gurrie, a South Carolina licensed asbestos inspector. A copy of Mr. Gurrie’s license is provided in Appendix D. Each sample was extracted with a pre-cleaned sampling instrument then placed in a plastic bag. Each bag was numbered and data (including sample number, sample location, type of suspect material, and material condition) was recorded. The bulk samples were submitted through chain-of-custody procedures to SAI’s asbestos laboratory in Greensboro, North Carolina for analysis of asbestos type and content by Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) and analysis of asbestos type and content by Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM).

This laboratory is accredited by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP).

The samples were analyzed by a trained microscopist utilizing PLM coupled with dispersion staining in accordance with EPA Method 600/R-93/116 and 600/M4-82-020.

The USEPA recognizes a material as containing asbestos if an asbestos content of greater than one percent (>1%) is detected in a representative sample. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) recognizes a material as containing asbestos if any asbestos, regardless of content, is detected in a representative sample.

In accordance with SCDHEC Regulation 61-86.1, additional sample analysis, if necessary, was performed on one (1) representative sample in each homogeneous group of an organically bound material which did not contain asbestos as tested by the PLM method. The additional analysis was performed by TEM in accordance with Chatfield Method SOP 1988-02 Rev. 1. TEM can identify asbestos when fiber sizes are extremely small or if they are bound in a resinous material, for example, floor tile, mastic or asphaltic roofing.

3.0 STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION

Building 2600 is an approximate 12,000 square foot two-story building slab on grade masonry building constructed approximately 1993. This building is used as an office.

Exterior finishes are brick with a metal roof. The HVAC ducts are insulated with fiberglass with various mastics. Piping is insulated with fiberglass with white mastic at the seams. Suspect miscellaneous materials include floor tile, vinyl cove base mastic, drywall, ceiling tile, and various mastics. Suspect surfacing material consists of drywall joint compound and spray-applied fireproofing. No suspect thermal system insulation (TSI) was observed at the time of our evaluation. Non-suspect building materials include fiberglass insulation, concrete, metal roofing, and rubberized or silicone caulking.

Figures 1 and 2 in Appendix A provide a general building sketch. Site photographs are also provided.

4.0 FINDINGS

A total of 22 additional bulk sample layers of suspect asbestos-containing materials were collected from the structure. Figures 1 and 2 in Appendix A provide a general building sketch with sample locations. S&ME has also included previous sampling data from other firms where applicable. Site photographs are also provided. Sample descriptions, location, and analytical results are listed in Table 1, Asbestos Results Summary Table in Appendix B. Laboratory sample analysis and chain-of-custody forms for the suspect samples collected are included in the Appendix C. Additionally, copies of previous reports provided to, and utilized by, S&ME as part of this update are included in Appendix E.

No asbestos was detected in the suspect materials collected.

As part of the previous evaluation, window/door caulking on this building were tested.

However, during our evaluation, S&ME observed this material and it appeared to be a non-suspect silicone/rubber based caulk.

5.0 CONCLUSIONS / RECOMMENDATIONS

No asbestos was detected in the suspect materials associated with this building:

In accordance with OSHA's Asbestos Standard, the employer shall notify affected employees and contractors of the presence and location of asbestos-containing materials and test results. A full copy of the OSHA asbestos standard for general industry may be found at OSHA’s website (www.osha.gov) and should be referenced for specific information.

The scope of this evaluation is limited to the sections of the structure that were accessible to S&ME at the time of our evaluation. The scope of our services does not include a pre-project evaluation where destructive actions are necessary to determine if other materials are concealed behind finish materials. Additional suspect materials may be located in areas not readily accessible. For example, mastics located in between exterior brick and structural block, in confined spaces, materials located underground, or materials covered by newer materials. This evaluation did not include disassembling any building materials or equipment.

APPENDIX A

Building Sketch/Sample Locations

1) Drawing adapted from base map generated by Hub Testing Laboratory, Inc. and is not to scale

2) S&ME sampling locations are presented in blue font and are approximated

3) The locations of samples 10S-A,B,C were not identified in the previous report

First Floor

JAG Ft. Jackson, South Carolina DATE: 1/24/2012 S&ME Project No. 1265-11-452

SCALE: NTS General Building Sketch FIGURE NO.

CHECKED BY: GKF Building 2600

1DRAWN BY:

1) Drawing adapted from base map generated by Hub Testing Laboratory, Inc. and is not to scale

2) S&ME sampling locations are presented in blue font and are approximated

Second Floor

SCALE: NTS General Building Sketch

DATE: 1/24/2012

FIGURE NO.

2DRAWN BY: JAG

S&ME Project No. 1265-11-452

CHECKED BY: GKF Building 2600 Ft. Jackson, South Carolina

B4

Building 2600

Taken by: Jeff Gurrie Date Taken: 1/24/2012

1 Building 2600 2 12” White floor tile with gray accent

3 Base cove mastic 4 White…