Attachment VIII_BUILDING_2100_Specifications.pdf

Building 2100 Renovations Directorate of Public Works Fort Jackson, South Carolina

Solicitation Number: (TBD)

Specifications Volume 1 – Division 01 -14

Ready to Advertise

September 11, 2018

This page was intentionally left blank for duplex printing.

Building 2100 Renovations RTA Submittal 2018-072

Fort Jackson, South Carolina September 2018

CERTIFICATIONS

00 01 05 - 1

SECTION 00 01 05

CERTIFICATIONS

I hereby certify that the architectural portions of work included in these plans and specifications, except as otherwise indicated by other registered professionals, have been prepared by me or under my direct supervision, and that I have coordinated the architectural portions with those portions sealed by other registered professionals.

Lance Ballard, AIA Senior Architect

CROMWELL ARCHITECTS

ENGINEERS, INC.

Architects Engineers 1300 East 6 th Street

Little Rock, Arkansas 72202

September 11, 2018 Date

I hereby certify that the civil portions of work included in these plans and specifications, except as otherwise indicated, have been prepared by me, or under my direct supervision.

John Petersen, PE Civil Engineer

CROMWELL ARCHITECTS

ENGINEERS, INC.

Architects Engineers 1300 East 6 th Street

Little Rock, Arkansas 72202

Date

CERTIFICATIONS

00 01 05 - 2

I hereby certify that the structural portions of work included in these plans and specifications, except as otherwise indicated, have been prepared by me, or under my direct supervision.

Oscar Barrios, PE Structural Engineer

CROMWELL ARCHITECTS

ENGINEERS, INC.

Architects Engineers 1300 East 6 th Street

Little Rock, Arkansas 72202

I hereby certify that fire protection portions of work included in these plans and specifications, except as otherwise indicated, have been prepared by me, or under my direct supervision.

Brian Gerdwagen, FPE Fire Protection Engineer

CROMWELL ARCHITECTS

ENGINEERS, INC.

Architects Engineers 1300 East 6 th Street

Little Rock, Arkansas 72202

00 01 05 - 3

I hereby certify that the mechanical portions of work included in these plans and specifications, except as otherwise indicated, have been prepared by me, or under my direct supervision.

Robert L. Seay, PE, Mechanical Engineer Principal

CROMWELL ARCHITECTS

ENGINEERS, INC.

Architects Engineers 1300 East 6 th Street

Little Rock, Arkansas 72202

I hereby certify that the electrical portions of work included in these plans and specifications, except as otherwise indicated, have been prepared by me, or under my direct supervision.

Pamela S. McElrath, PE Electrical Engineer

CROMWELL ARCHITECTS

ENGINEERS, INC.

Architects Engineers 1300 East 6 th Street

Little Rock, Arkansas 72202

Bui l di ng 2100 Renovat i ons RTA Submi t t al 2018-072 For t Jackson, Sout h Car ol i na Sept ember 2018

PROJECT TABLE OF CONTENTS

DI VI SI ON 01 - GENERAL REQUI REMENTS

01 11 00 SUMMARY OF WORK

01 32 01 PROJECT SCHEDULE

01 33 00 SUBMI TTAL PROCEDURES

01 35 26 GOVERNMENTAL SAFETY REQUI REMENTS

01 45 00. 00 10 QUALI TY CONTROL SYSTEM ( QCS)

01 45 00. 00 20 QUALI TY CONTROL

01 45 35 SPECI AL I NSPECTI ONS

01 50 00 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTI ON FACI LI TI ES AND CONTROLS

01 57 19 TEMPORARY ENVI RONMENTAL CONTROLS

01 74 19 CONSTRUCTI ON AND DEMOLI TI ON WASTE MANAGEMENT

01 78 00 CLOSEOUT SUBMI TTALS

01 78 23 OPERATI ON AND MAI NTENANCE DATA

DI VI SI ON 02 - EXI STI NG CONDI TI ONS

02 41 00 DEMOLITION

02 84 16 HANDLI NG OF LI GHTI NG BALLASTS AND LAMPS CONTAI NI NG PCBs

AND MERCURY

DI VI SI ON 03 - CONCRETE

03 30 53 MI SCELLANEOUS CAST- I N- PLACE CONCRETE

DI VI SI ON 04 - MASONRY

04 20 00 UNI T MASONRY

DI VI SI ON 05 - METALS

05 12 00 STRUCTURAL STEEL

05 30 00 STEEL DECKS

05 30 20 HI GH TEMPERATURE WELDI NG CURTAI NS

05 50 13 MI SCELLANEOUS METAL FABRI CATI ONS

05 52 00 METAL RAI LI NGS

DI VI SI ON 06 - WOOD, PLASTI CS, AND COMPOSI TES

06 10 00 ROUGH CARPENTRY

06 41 16. 00 10 LAMI NATE CLAD ARCHI TECTURAL CASEWORK

DI VI SI ON 07 - THERMAL AND MOI STURE PROTECTI ON

07 84 00 FIRESTOPPING

07 92 00 JOI NT SEALANTS

DI VI SI ON 08 - OPENI NGS

08 11 13 STEEL DOORS AND FRAMES

08 14 00 WOOD DOORS

08 31 00 ACCESS DOORS AND PANELS

08 34 83 ELEVATOR DOOR SMOKE CONTAI NMENT SYSTEM

08 51 13. 00 20 ALUMI NUM SERVI CE WI NDOWS

08 71 00 DOOR HARDWARE

08 81 00 GLAZING

PROJECT TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1

DI VI SI ON 09 - FI NI SHES

09 05 61 COMMON WORK RESULTS FOR FLOORI NG PREPARATI ON

09 22 00 SUPPORTS FOR PLASTER AND GYPSUM BOARD

09 22 36 LATH

09 23 00 GYPSUM PLASTERI NG

09 29 00 GYPSUM BOARD

09 30 10 CERAMI C TI LI NG

09 51 00 ACOUSTI CAL CEI LI NGS

09 65 00 RESI LI ENT FLOORI NG

09 68 00 CARPETING

09 90 00 PAI NTS AND COATI NGS

DI VI SI ON 10 - SPECI ALTI ES

10 14 00. 20 I NTERI OR SI GNAGE

10 21 13 TOI LET COMPARTMENTS

10 21 23. 16 CUBI CLE TRACK AND HARDWARE

10 26 13 CORNER GUARDS

10 28 13 TOI LET ACCESSORI ES

DI VI SI ON 12 - FURNI SHI NGS

12 21 00 WI NDOW BLI NDS

12 36 00 COUNTERTOPS

DI VI SI ON 13 - SPECI AL CONSTRUCTI ON

13 48 00 SEI SMI C BRACI NG FOR MI SCELLANEOUS EQUI PMENT

DI VI SI ON 14 - CONVEYI NG EQUI PMENT

14 24 23 ROPED HYDRAULI C ELEVATORS

DI VI SI ON 21 - FI RE SUPPRESSI ON

21 13 13. 00 10 WET PI PE SPRI NKLER SYSTEM, FI RE PROTECTI ON

DI VI SI ON 22 - PLUMBI NG

22 00 00 PLUMBI NG, GENERAL PURPOSE

DI VI SI ON 23 - HEATI NG, VENTI LATI NG, AND AI R CONDI TI ONI NG ( HVAC)

23 00 00 AI R SUPPLY, DI STRI BUTI ON, VENTI LATI ON, AND EXHAUST SYSTEMS

23 05 15 COMMON PI PI NG FOR HVAC

23 05 93 TESTI NG, ADJUSTI NG, AND BALANCI NG FOR HVAC

23 07 00 THERMAL I NSULATI ON FOR MECHANI CAL SYSTEMS

23 09 00 I NSTRUMENTATI ON AND CONTROL FOR HVAC

23 21 13. 23 20 MEDI UM TEMPERATURE WATER SYSTEM WI THI N BUI LDI NGS

23 25 00 CHEMI CAL TREATMENT OF WATER FOR MECHANI CAL SYSTEMS

23 64 26 CHI LLED, CHI LLED- HOT, AND CONDENSER WATER PI PI NG SYSTEMS

23 73 13. 00 40 MODULAR I NDOOR CENTRAL- STATI ON AI R- HANDLI NG UNI TS

23 82 23. 00 40 UNI T VENTI LATORS

DI VI SI ON 25 - I NTEGRATED AUTOMATI ON

25 10 10 UTI LI TY MONI TORI NG AND CONTROL SYSTEM ( UMCS) FRONT END

AND I NTEGRATI ON

PROJECT TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 2

DI VI SI ON 26 - ELECTRI CAL

26 05 48. 00 10 SEI SMI C PROTECTI ON FOR ELECTRI CAL EQUI PMENT

26 20 00 I NTERI OR DI STRI BUTI ON SYSTEM

26 32 14. 00 10 DI ESEL- GENERATOR SET, STATI ONARY 15- 300 KW, STANDBY

APPLICATIONS

26 36 00. 00 10 AUTOMATI C TRANSFER SWI TCH AND BY- PASS/ I SOLATI ON SWI TCH

26 51 00 I NTERI OR LI GHTI NG

26 56 00 EXTERI OR LI GHTI NG

DI VI SI ON 27 - COMMUNI CATI ONS

27 10 00 BUI LDI NG TELECOMMUNI CATI ONS CABLI NG SYSTEM

27 51 19 SOUND MASKI NG AND PAGI NG SYSTEMS

DI VI SI ON 28 - ELECTRONI C SAFETY AND SECURI TY

28 31 76 I NTERI OR FI RE ALARM AND MASS NOTI FI CATI ON SYSTEM

DI VI SI ON 31 - EARTHWORK

31 00 00 EARTHWORK

31 11 00 CLEARI NG AND GRUBBI NG

DI VI SI ON 32 - EXTERI OR I MPROVEMENTS

32 01 19 FI ELD MOLDED SEALANTS FOR SEALI NG JOI NTS I N RI GI D

PAVEMENTS

32 11 20 BASE COURSE FOR RI GI D PAVI NG

32 13 13. 06 PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE PAVEMENT FOR ROADS AND SI TE

FACILITIES

32 17 23 PAVEMENT MARKI NGS

32 31 13. 53 HI GH- SECURI TY CHAI N LI NK FENCES AND GATES

32 92 23 SODDING

DI VI SI ON 33 - UTI LI TI ES

33 71 02 UNDERGROUND ELECTRI CAL DI STRI BUTI ON

- - End of Pr oj ect Tabl e of Cont ent s - -

PROJECT TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 3

SECTION 00 31 00

AVAILABLE PROJECT INFORMATION

PART 1 GENERAL

1.1 Existing Conditions

Certain information relating to existing surface and subsurface conditions and structures is available to bidders but will not be part of the Contract Documents.

a. Asbestos-Containing Material and Lead Based Paint Re-Inspection Report, dated June 26, 2018.

b. IGIS Deliverables.

For convenience, a copy follows the end of this Section.

-- End of Section --

DOCUMENT 00 31 00 Page 1

ASBESTOS-CONTAINING MATERIAL AND

LEAD-BASED PAINT RE-INSPECTION

BUILDING 2100

FORT JACKSON

COLUMBIA, RICHLAND COUNTY, SOUTH CAROLINA

CONTRACT NUMBER: W912HP-15-D-0004

Prepared For:

Cromwell Architects Engineers, Inc.

101 South Spring Street

Little Rock, Arkansas 72201

(501) 372-2900

Prepared By:

Aerostar SES LLC 11181 St. Johns Industrial Parkway North

Jacksonville, Florida 32246

(904) 565-2820

Aerostar SES LLC Project # M3010.1653.0001.17

June 26, 2018

SIGNATURE OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONALS

This is to certify that the report for the Asbestos-Containing Material and Lead-Based Paint Re-Inspection of Building 2100 located at Fort Jackson, Columbia, Richland County, South Carolina, has been examined by the undersigned.

DATE June 26, 2018 SIGNATURE:

Miles J. Eckert Aerostar SES LLC Asbestos Building Inspector Certification No. BI-01055 Lead-Based Paint Risk Assessor Certification No. LBP-R-124717-1

DATE June 26, 2018 SIGNATURE:

John H. Hubbard Aerostar SES LLC Senior Project Manager

Building 2100, Fort Jackson, Columbia, Richland County, South Carolina June 26, 2018 Asbestos-Containing Material and Lead-Based Paint Re-Inspection Report; Aerostar Job Number M3010.1653.0001.17 Page i

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SIGNATURE OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONALS

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1.1 Site Name

1.2 Name and Certificate of Inspector(s)

1.3 Site Description and Activities

1.4 Findings and Results

1.4.1 Asbestos Survey

1.4.2 Lead-Based Paint Survey

2.0 INTRODUCTION

3.0 REGULATORY SUMMARY

3.1 Asbestos

3.1.1 Environmental Protection Agency

3.1.2 Occupational Safety and Health Administration

3.1.3 State of South Carolina

3.2 Lead-Based Paint

3.2.1 Occupational Safety and Health Administration

3.2.2 U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development

4.0 METHODS OF INVESTIGATION

4.1 Asbestos Survey

4.2 Lead-Based Paint Survey

5.0 RESULTS

5.1 Asbestos Survey Results

5.2 Lead-Based Paint Survey Results

6.0 LIMITATIONS

7.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

7.1 Asbestos-Containing Materials

7.2 Lead-Based Paint

TABLES

TABLE 1 Summary of Asbestos Survey TABLE 2 Summary of XRF Survey

Asbestos-Containing Material and Lead-Based Paint Re-Inspection Report; Aerostar Job Number M3010.1653.0001.17 Page ii

FIGURES

FIGURE 1 Homogeneous Area Sample Locations – First Floor FIGURE 2 Homogeneous Area Sample Locations – Second Floor FIGURE 3 Asbestos-Containing Material Locations – First Floor FIGURE 4 Asbestos-Containing Material Locations – Second Floor FIGURE 5 XRF and Paint Chip Sample Locations – First Floor FIGURE 6 XRF Sample Locations – Second Floor

APPENDICES

APPENDIX A Certifications APPENDIX B Laboratory Analytical Results APPENDIX C Photographic Documentation

Asbestos-Containing Material and Lead-Based Paint Re-Inspection Report; Aerostar Job Number M3010.1653.0001.17 Page 1

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1.1 Site Name

Building 2100, Fort Jackson Columbia, Richland County, South Carolina Contract No: W912HP-15-D-0004

1.2 Name and Certificate of Inspector(s)

Miles Eckert Asbestos Building Inspector Asbestos Certification No. BI-01055 Lead-Based Paint Risk Assessor Lead Certification No. LBP-R-124717-1

1.3 Site Description and Activities

In July of 2015, Aerostar SES LLC (Aerostar) conducted an Asbestos-Containing Materials (ACM) and Lead-Based Paint (LBP) Survey throughout Building 2100 located at Fort Jackson, Columbia, Richland County, South Carolina. The survey included all accessible areas throughout the building’s exterior and interior. The results of the survey were reported in the Final HazMat Studies report dated September 11, 2015.

On June 4, 2018, at the request of Cromwell Architects Engineers, Inc. (Cromwell) Aerostar conducted a re-inspection of Building 2100 to verify the location, quantities, and conditions of ACM and LBP previously identified by Aerostar and to identify any additional materials.

This re-inspection report includes the original findings, any changes in the original findings, and any newly discovered materials.

1.4 Findings and Results

The following table summarizes the findings throughout Building 2100 and identifies material requiring special handling:

Building Friable ACM Non-friable Category I

ACM

Non-friable Category II

ACM

Material Containing

<1% Asbestos

LBP

≥1.0 mg/cm2

2100 No Yes* Yes* No Yes†

* Materials must be handled in accordance with 40 CFR 61 Subpart M and 29 CFR 1926.1101 † Lead concentrations were also detected <1.0 mg/cm2 or <0.5 % wt. which must be handled in accordance with

OSHA Standard 29 CFR 1926.62

Asbestos-Containing Material and Lead-Based Paint Re-Inspection Report; Aerostar Job Number M3010.1653.0001.17 Page 2

1.4.1 Asbestos Survey

A South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control (SCDHEC)-Accredited Asbestos Building Inspector performed a visual reconnaissance of previously identified material and additional suspect ACMs in all accessible areas throughout Building 2100 to identify and confirm the locations, quantities, and conditions of ACMs.

In July 2015, a total of 21 homogeneous areas were previously identified in Building 2100;

nineteen of which were sampled. Samples were submitted to EMSL Analytical, Inc. (EMSL) in Morrisville, NC, for analysis by Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM). Non-friable Organically Bound (NOB) materials containing 1% or less asbestos by PLM were reanalyzed by Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) analysis to verify asbestos content. Analytical results revealed none of the 19 previously sampled materials were found to contain asbestos by PLM or TEM. Two homogeneous areas previously identified were not sampled due to the systems being energized and operational or being encased within doors and are assumed to contain asbestos until sampled, which includes gaskets and fire doors.

During the re-inspection conducted in June 2018, three additional homogeneous areas were identified and sampled. Samples were submitted to EMSL in Orlando Florida for analysis by PLM.

Materials identified by the laboratory as having complex matrices were reanalyzed by the Point Count Procedure to further quantitate asbestos content. Analytical results of the samples revealed that none of the additional homogeneous areas identified and sampled were found to contain asbestos by PLM or the Point Count Procedure. The presence of the two homogeneous areas previously identified and assumed to contain asbestos were confirmed as remaining in the building.

Removal and handling of ACMs should be conducted in accordance with the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s (OSHA) Construction Standard for Asbestos 29 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 1926.1101 and the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) Standard 40 CFR 61 Subpart M, and transportation of ACM should be conducted in accordance with the Department of Transportation (DOT) regulations outlined in 49 CFR 173.216. ACM must be disposed of at a facility permitted by the EPA and RIDH to accept asbestos.

Suspect ACMs encountered during renovation/demolition activities that are not identified in this survey should be assumed to contain asbestos or be sampled by a SCDHEC-accredited asbestos inspector and analyzed by an accredited laboratory.

1.4.2 Lead-Based Paint Survey

In July 2105, a LBP survey was previously performed throughout Building 2100 using Niton XLp 302A series X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF) portable spectrum analyzers, serial numbers 23358 and 23952. The survey was conducted by an Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)-certified Inspector or Risk Assessor. A lead concentration equal to or greater than 1.0 mg/cm2 was found in one XRF sample location, which includes a metal I-beam. Detectable concentrations of lead below

1.0 mg/cm2 were found in 33 XRF sample locations. Cinder block walls, a concrete ceiling, a concrete tread, a drywall ceiling, a drywall wall, metal bay doors, a metal bay door track, metal beams, a metal door casing, a metal I-beam, a metal post, metal rails, and metal risers exhibited detectable lead concentrations less than 1.0 mg/cm2. Aerostar previously collected one paint chip

Asbestos-Containing Material and Lead-Based Paint Re-Inspection Report; Aerostar Job Number M3010.1653.0001.17 Page 3 sample from select paints and coatings for laboratory analysis by Flame AAS. The paint chip sample collected from the brown metal I-beam on the loading dock was found to contain lead less than 0.5% wt.

In June 2018, Aerostar re-inspected all paints and coatings reported in the 2015 survey. No changes to original paint conditions or indications of additional painting were observed during the re-inspection and no additional XRF or paint chip sampling was conducted.

Asbestos-Containing Material and Lead-Based Paint Re-Inspection Report; Aerostar Job Number M3010.1653.0001.17 Page 4

2.0 INTRODUCTION

In July 2015, Aerostar conducted an ACM and LBP Survey for Building 2100 located at Fort Jackson, Columbia, Richland County, South Carolina. The area of the survey included all accessible areas throughout the building’s exterior and interior.

On June 4, 2018, Aerostar conducted an ACM and LBP re-inspection survey of Building 2100.

The asbestos survey activities were conducted by a SC-DHEC-accredited Building Inspector. The LBP survey was conducted by an EPA-certified Inspector or Risk Assessor. Aerostar is certified by the EPA, Pesticides and Toxic Substances Branch, to conduct lead-based paint activities in the State of South Carolina. Copies of personnel and firm certifications are included in Appendix A.

3.0 REGULATORY SUMMARY

3.1 Asbestos

3.1.1 Environmental Protection Agency

The EPA has published a list of hazardous air pollutants and promulgated the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) regulations. Since asbestos presents a significant risk to human health as a result of air emissions from one or more source categories, it is therefore considered a hazardous air pollutant. The Asbestos NESHAP Regulation (40 CFR 61, Subpart M) addresses milling, manufacturing and fabricating operations, demolition and renovation activities, waste disposal issues, active and inactive waste disposal sites and asbestos conversion processes.

Friable ACM is defined by the Asbestos NESHAP regulations as any material containing greater than 1% asbestos as determined using the method specified in Appendix E, Subpart E, 40 CFR Part 763, Section 1, PLM, that, when dry, can be crumbled, pulverized or reduced to powder by hand pressure (Sec. 61.141).

Non-friable ACM is any material containing greater than 1% asbestos as determined using the method specified in Appendix E, Subpart E, 40 CFR Part 763, Section 1, PLM, that, when dry, cannot be crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by hand pressure (Sec. 61.141).

EPA also defines two categories of non-friable ACM: Category I and Category II non-friable

ACM.

• Category I non-friable ACM is any asbestos-containing packing, gasket, mastic, resilient floor covering or asphalt roofing product which contains greater than 1% asbestos as determined using PLM according to the method specified in Appendix E, Subpart E, 40 CFR Part 763 (Sec. 61.141).

• Category II non-friable ACM is any material, excluding Category I non-friable ACM, containing greater than 1% asbestos as determined using PLM according to the methods

Asbestos-Containing Material and Lead-Based Paint Re-Inspection Report; Aerostar Job Number M3010.1653.0001.17 Page 5 specified in Appendix E, Subpart E, 40 CFR Part 763 (Sec. 61.141), that, when dry, cannot be crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by hand pressure.

Regulated Asbestos-Containing Material (RACM) is: (a) friable ACM, (b) Category I non-friable ACM that has become friable, (c) Category I non-friable ACM that will be or has been subjected to sanding, grinding, cutting or abrading, or (d) Category II non-friable ACM that has a high probability of becoming or has become crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by the forces expected to act on the material in the course of demolition or renovation operations.

Category I non-friable ACM must be inspected and tested for friability if it is in poor condition prior to demolition to determine whether or not it is subject to NESHAP. If the ACM is friable, it must be handled in accordance with NESHAP. Asbestos-containing packings, gaskets, resilient floor coverings and asphalt roofing materials must be removed prior to demolition only if they are in poor condition and are friable.

NESHAP further requires that if a facility is demolished by intentional burning, all of the facility's ACM, including Category I and II non-friable ACM, must be removed prior to burning (Sec.

61.145(c)(10)).

If Category I or Category II non-friable ACM is to be sanded, ground, cut, or abraded, the material is considered RACM and the owner or operator must abide by the following (Sec. 61.145(c)(1)):

(i) Adequately wet the material during the sanding, grinding, cutting or abrading operations;

(ii) Comply with the requirements of 61.145(c)(3)(i) if wetting would unavoidably damage equipment or present a safety hazard; and

(iii) Handle asbestos material produced by the sanding, grinding, cutting, or abrading, as asbestos-containing waste material subject to the waste handling and collection provisions of Section 61.150.

Except for the following, Section 61.145(c) of the Asbestos NESHAP regulation requires that each owner or operator of a demolition or renovation activity involving RACM remove all such material from a facility being demolished or renovated before any activity begins that would break up, dislodge, or similarly disturb the material or preclude access to the material for subsequent removal.

ACM need not be removed before demolition or renovation if it:

(i) Is a Category I non-friable ACM that has not become friable;

(ii) Is on a facility component that is encased in concrete or other similarly hard material and is adequately wet whenever exposed during demolition or renovation;

(iii) Was not accessible for testing and therefore was not discovered until after demolition or renovation began and, as a result of the demolition or renovation, cannot be safely removed. If not removed for safety reasons, the exposed RACM and any asbestos-contaminated debris must be treated as asbestos-containing waste material and kept adequately wet at all times until disposed of; or

Asbestos-Containing Material and Lead-Based Paint Re-Inspection Report; Aerostar Job Number M3010.1653.0001.17 Page 6

(iv) Is a Category II non-friable ACM and the probability is low that the material will become crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder during demolition or renovation.

3.1.2 Occupational Safety and Health Administration

The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) regulates asbestos exposure during all construction work including, but not limited to, the following:

• Demolition or salvage of structures where asbestos is present;

• Removal or encapsulation of materials containing asbestos;

• Construction, alteration, repair, maintenance, or renovation of structures, substrates, or portions thereof, that contain asbestos;

• Installation of products containing asbestos;

• Asbestos spill/emergency cleanup; and

• Transportation, disposal, storage, containment of and housekeeping activities involving asbestos or products containing asbestos, on the site or location at which construction activities are performed.

The OSHA Standard 29 CFR 1926.1101 requires the use of engineering controls, work practices, and personal protective equipment to reduce or eliminate employee exposure to asbestos. The OSHA standard does not apply to asbestos-containing asphalt roof coatings, cements and mastics.

3.1.3 State of South Carolina

According to SCDHEC Regulation 61-86.1, Section IV.A, asbestos consultants, contractors, and inspectors must be licensed by the SC-DHEC.

SCDHEC Regulation 61-86.1, Section X, requires that SCDHEC be notified of any asbestos abatement activity, renovation or operations and maintenance (O&M) activity affecting asbestos-containing building materials (ACBM), or any demolition in facilities or public buildings.

According to SCDHEC Regulation 61-86.1, Section VI.D.2, negative results for non-friable organically bound (NOB) materials should be verified with at least one TEM analysis in accordance with the American Society for Testing Building Materials (ASTM) Standard E2356 standard practice for comprehensive building asbestos surveys.

3.2 Lead-Based Paint

3.2.1 Occupational Safety and Health Administration

OSHA regulates lead exposure during all construction work including, but not limited to, the following:

• Demolition or salvage of structures where lead is present;

• Removal or encapsulation of materials containing lead;

Asbestos-Containing Material and Lead-Based Paint Re-Inspection Report; Aerostar Job Number M3010.1653.0001.17 Page 7

• Construction, alteration, repair, maintenance, or renovation of structures, substrates, or portions thereof, that contain lead;

• Installation of products containing lead;

• Lead spill/emergency cleanup; and

• Transportation, disposal, storage, containment of and housekeeping activities involving products containing lead, on the site or location at which construction activities are performed.

The OSHA Standard 29 CFR 1926.62 requires the use of engineering controls, work practices, and personal protective equipment to reduce or eliminate employee exposure to lead.

3.2.2 U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development

According to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) guidelines 20 CFR Part 35, lead-based paint is defined as paint containing a lead concentration greater than or equal to 0.5 % wt by laboratory analysis or 1.0 mg/cm2 of lead by XRF. HUD’s definition of LBP cannot be used to determine safe working conditions under OSHA. OSHA’s Lead in Construction Standard, 29 CFR 1926.62, was intended to apply to any detectable concentration of lead in paint by laboratory analysis. OSHA’s only accepted methodology for determining an employee’s exposure to airborne lead contaminants is through personal air monitoring. Any paint with detectable concentrations of lead, by XRF or laboratory analysis that is subjected to cutting, abrading, welding, scraping, and/or sanding, must be handled in accordance with 29 CFR 1926.62, to prevent employee exposure.

4.0 METHODS OF INVESTIGATION

4.1 Asbestos Survey

Sampling protocols set forth by the EPA under 40 CFR 763.86, SCDHEC Standards of Performance for Asbestos Projects (Regulation 61-86.1), and ASTM International Standard Practice for Comprehensive Building Asbestos Surveys (E2356-14) were followed during the inspection. The asbestos survey was performed by observing, touching, and sampling accessible suspect building materials throughout Building 2100. The purpose of this survey was to locate and identify suspect ACMs, to quantify the material, and to separate it into unique areas for further assessment. The condition and location of representative suspect materials were defined throughout the building.

Bulk asbestos sampling procedures utilized for the collection of suspect ACMs first required the establishment of a homogeneous sampling area. A homogeneous sampling area is defined as an area of material of the same type (texture and color) which was applied during the same general time period. Each individual sampling area was then examined and representative samples of suspect materials were collected. The U.S. EPA has published guidelines and recommendations pertaining to surveying and sampling for friable ACMs. The guidelines were followed during the survey where appropriate. U.S. EPA publications and current regulations mainly address friable materials, such as surface finishes and structural fireproofing. The samples were analyzed by PLM with dispersion staining according to EPA Method 600/R-93/116. The PLM test is an EPA-

Asbestos-Containing Material and Lead-Based Paint Re-Inspection Report; Aerostar Job Number M3010.1653.0001.17 Page 8 approved analytical method for asbestos identification. Bulk samples were collected by an AHERA-certified Asbestos Inspector accredited by SC-DHEC, and analyzed by a laboratory that maintains accreditation through the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) for the analysis of bulk samples by PLM. The test uses the unique optical properties of mineral forms in the samples to specifically identify the various asbestos types. In accordance with SC-DHEC Regulation 61-86.1, Section VI.D.2, negative results for NOB materials were verified by TEM analysis in accordance with ASTM E2356-14. Materials identified as having complex matrices were reanalyzed by the EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using PLM and Milling Preparation and Quantitation using the 400 Point Count Procedure.

Where distinct layers were present, bulk samples were collected to represent each individual layer of the suspect material. Mastic and/or other adhesive substances were included when possible. At the time of sample collection, the inspector noted material type, approximate amount, sampling locations, and condition of the materials.

Samples were labeled with a unique alphanumeric identification system (xxxx-yy-zz). The first set of characters (xxxx) indicates the building number assigned by the facility. The second set of numbers (yy) indicates the homogeneous area designation assigned by the asbestos inspector. The third set of numbers (zz) is the individual sample identification number. Where distinct layers were separated, a letter (A, B, C) was assigned for each additional layer analyzed by the laboratory.

The surface area of the samples was adequately wetted prior to sample collection. All necessary precautions were taken to prevent visible emissions, air-borne fiber release, and debris, and to protect the facility occupants from exposure. Samples were submitted in independent sealed containers to EMSL Analytical, Inc. (EMSL), 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, New Jersey;

and 2500 Gateway Centre Boulevard, Suite 600, Morrisville, North Carolina, and 3303 Parkway Center Court, Orlando, Florida for laboratory analysis according to EPA Method 600/R-93/116.

4.2 Lead-Based Paint Survey

The LBP inspection was performed using Niton XLp 302A series XRF portable spectrum analyzers, serial numbers 23358 and 23952. The Niton XLp 302A series XRF uses a Cadmium- 109 radioactive source. The source undergoes a radioactive decay, in a two-step process, that releases x-rays and gamma rays with enough energy to cause both K-shell and L-shell fluorescence. During this process, if the primary x-ray emitted by the XRF has sufficient energy, electrons are ejected from the inner shells of the lead atoms, creating vacancies that cause an unstable condition for the atoms. As the atoms return to their stable condition, electrons from the outer shells are transferred to the inner shells releasing energy. The Niton XLp 302A series XRF uses dual detectors to read the K-shell and L-shell energy spectrums that are produced.

XRF sampling results were obtained from each sampling area throughout the building. The sampling locations were determined by the color of paint, substrate, and location throughout the building. Building 2100 was arbitrarily designated as follows: “A” west; and “B”, “C”, and “D” proceeding clockwise in relation to side “A”. The XRF sample results are reported in mg/cm2.

Calibration checks were performed immediately before, after, and every four hours during the LBP survey to ensure the sample results were within the tolerance limits of the instrument’s Performance Characteristic Sheet.

Asbestos-Containing Material and Lead-Based Paint Re-Inspection Report; Aerostar Job Number M3010.1653.0001.17 Page 9

Paint chip samples were deemed necessary and previously collected from paints and coatings of representative substrates. The sampling locations were determined by the color of paint, substrate, and location throughout the buildings. The sampling locations were labeled with the corresponding XRF reading number. Paint chip samples included all layers of paint to the substrate material. Samples were submitted to EMSL Cinnaminson, New Jersey, a laboratory which maintains accreditation through the Environmental Lead Laboratory Accreditation Program (ELLAP) for analysis by Flame AAS.

5.0 RESULTS

5.1 Asbestos Survey Results

An SCDHEC-certified Asbestos Inspector conducted an asbestos survey and re-inspection of Building 2100 to identify and confirm the locations, quantities, and conditions of ACMs. Aerostar performed the asbestos survey throughout all areas of the building’s exterior and interior. A total of 24 homogeneous areas were identified. The homogeneous areas identified included:

• 4” Vinyl Cove Base

• Mastic associated with 4” Vinyl Cove Base

• 12”x12” VFT (3 types)

• Mastic associated with 12”x12” VFT (3 types)

• 2’x2’ Ceiling Tile

• HVAC Mastic

• Fiberglass TSI Canvas with Mastic

• TSI Mastic

• Caulk/Putty (2 types)

• Mastic

• Skim Coat

• Fire Proofing

• Gypsum Wallboard

• Joint Compound

• Fire Doors

• Gaskets

• Concrete Block

• Mortar associated with Concrete Block

• Concrete Block Fill

A total of 91 samples were collected and submitted to EMSL for analysis by PLM, TEM, or Point Count Procedure. Analytical results of the samples revealed that none of the 22 homogeneous areas sampled were found to contain greater than 1% asbestos by PLM.

Two homogeneous areas were not sampled due to systems being energized or materials being encased and are assumed to contain asbestos until sampled. Assumed materials are as follows:

Asbestos-Containing Material and Lead-Based Paint Re-Inspection Report; Aerostar Job Number M3010.1653.0001.17 Page 10

Material Description

Homogeneous Area ID Location Approximate

Amount Asbestos Type % NESHAP Category

Fire Doors 2100-16 Mechanical Rooms and Shop Doors

504 SF (24

Doors ~ 21 SF each) Assumed NF Cat. II

Gaskets 2100-17 Water Pipes – Mechanical Rooms 50 SF Assumed NF Cat. I

In accordance with SC-DHEC Regulation 61-86.1, Section VI.D.2, negative results for NOB materials were verified by TEM analysis. Laboratory analysis indicated that none of the 16 NOB materials with no asbestos detected by PLM were found to contain greater than 1% asbestos by

TEM.

Two samples were reanalyzed by the Point Count Procedure due to the laboratory identifying complex matrices. None of the two samples reanalyzed by the Point Count Procedure were found to contain greater than 1% asbestos.

Asbestos sample results are summarized in Table 1. Sample locations are depicted on Figures 1 and 2. Asbestos-containing material locations are depicted on Figures 3 and 4. Inspector and laboratory credentials are provided in Appendix A. Copies of the laboratory analytical results and appropriate Chain of Custody Records are included in Appendix B. Photographic Documentation is included in Appendix C.

5.2 Lead-Based Paint Survey Results

Based on the HUD guidelines, an XRF sample equal to or greater than 1.0 mg/cm2 of lead by XRF or 0.5% wt. by laboratory analysis is considered to be LBP. XRF sample readings (Pbc ± Pbc Error) are reported as lead concentration (Pbc) in mg/cm2 plus or minus the statistical deviation (Pbc Error) that allows for 95% confidence. To determine the XRF sample result to be positive or negative, the XRF sample readings (Pbc ± Pbc Error) were reported as a 95% confidence interval compared to HUD’s definition of LBP (1.0 mg/cm2). HUD’s definition of LBP cannot be used to determine safe working conditions under OSHA. OSHA’s Lead in Construction Standard, 29 CFR 1926.62, was intended to apply to any detectable concentration of lead in paint by laboratory analysis.

One building component which exhibited an XRF sample result containing a lead concentration greater than or equal to 1.0 mg/cm2 was a brown metal I-beam on the exterior of the building.

Additionally, detectable concentrations of lead below the level which HUD defines as LBP (1.0 mg/cm2) were recorded in the following building components:

• A black cinder block wall in the hallway on the second floor

• A black drywall wall in Room 206 on the second floor

• A brown metal bay door on the exterior of the building

• A brown metal I-beam on the exterior of the building

• A gold cinder block wall in the south stairwell on the second floor

Asbestos-Containing Material and Lead-Based Paint Re-Inspection Report; Aerostar Job Number M3010.1653.0001.17 Page 11

• Gray cinder block walls in the MOD 2 (small engine lab) on the first floor and in the south stairwell on the second floor

• A gray concrete tread in the north stairwell on the first floor

• A gray metal bay door track in MOD 3 on the first floor

• A gray metal door casing in Room 215 on the second floor

• Gray metal rails in the north and northeast stairwells on the first floor; and in the south stairwell on the second floor

• Gray metal risers in the north stairwell on the second floor

• Green cinder block walls in Room 111 on the first floor and the hallway on the second floor

• Light yellow cinder block walls in Room 122, the break room, and MOD 2 (small engine lab) on the first floor; and Room 218 on the second floor

• Light yellow metal beams in the hallway on the first floor

• A red cinder block wall in the south stairwell on the second floor

• A silver cinder block wall in the south stairwell on the second floor

• A teal cinder block wall in the male latrine on the second floor

• A white cinder block wall in Room 103 on the first floor

• A white concrete ceiling in Room 104 on the first floor

• A white drywall ceiling in Room 114 on the first floor

• A yellow metal bay door in MOD 3 on the first floor

• A yellow metal post in MOD 3 on the first floor

Based on HUD guidelines, a laboratory analysis of a paint chip sample equal to or greater than 0.5 % wt. is the action level at which the paint is considered to be LBP. Laboratory analysis by EPA analytical method SW 846-3050B/7000B for lead has a reporting limit of 0.010 % wt. based upon a minimum sample weight of 0.2 grams. One paint chip sample was collected from select paints and coatings for laboratory analysis by Flame AAS. The paint chip sample included all layers of paint to the substrate material. Laboratory analytical results showed paint chip sample 2100-P1 collected from a brown metal I-beam on the loading dock was found to contain a lead concentration of 0.22% wt.

In June, 2018, Aerostar re-inspected all paints and coatings reported in the 2015 survey. No changes to original paint conditions or indications of additional painting were observed during the re-inspection and no additional XRF or paint chip sampling was conducted.

XRF sample results are provided in Table 2. XRF and Paint Chip Sample locations are depicted on Figures 5 and 6. Consultant and inspector credentials are provided in Appendix A.

6.0 LIMITATIONS

Aerostar has prepared this Draft ACM Survey Report for Cromwell Architects Engineers, Inc., hereafter referred to as the Client. No ACM and LBP survey or re-inspection can eliminate all uncertainty. Professional judgment and interpretation are inherent in the process and uncertainty is inevitable. Even when sampling is executed with an appropriate site-specific standard of care, certain conditions present especially difficult detection problems. Such conditions may include, but are not limited to, physical limitations imposed by the location and accessibility of possible

Asbestos-Containing Material and Lead-Based Paint Re-Inspection Report; Aerostar Job Number M3010.1653.0001.17 Page 12

ACMs and LBPs, and the limitations of assessment technologies. Only reasonably accessible areas were surveyed as part of this investigation. Aerostar is not responsible for possible ACMs or LBPs that were inaccessible and/or not located, or any consequential damages as a result thereof.

Measurements and sampling data only represent the site conditions at the time of the data collection. Aerostar makes no legal representations whatsoever concerning any matter including, but not limited to, ownership of any property or the interpretation of any law. Aerostar further disclaims any obligations to update the report for events taking place after the time during which the assessment was conducted.

This report is not a comprehensive site characterization and should not be construed as such. The opinions presented in this report are based upon the findings derived from the samples collected.

The scope of work performed herein was limited to asbestos sample collection and laboratory analysis of only the samples collected at the time of inspection and identification of materials containing asbestos. Aerostar has endeavored to meet what it believes is the applicable standard of care, and, in doing so, is obliged to advise the Client of the limitations. Aerostar believes that providing information about limitations is essential to help the Client identify and thereby manage its risks. Through additional testing, these risks can be mitigated - but they cannot be eliminated.

Aerostar will, upon request, advise the Client of the additional research opportunities available, their impact, and their cost.

As noted above, the ACM and LBP survey and re-inspection conducted at the referenced site and this report was prepared for the use solely by the Clients. This report shall not be relied upon by or transferred to any other party without the express written authorization of Aerostar; however, this report may be made available for informational and bidding purposes.

7.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

The following table summarizes the findings within the building and identifies material requiring special handling:

Building Friable ACM Non-friable Category I

ACM

Non-friable Category II

ACM

Material Containing

<1% Asbestos

LBP

≥1.0 mg/cm2

2100 No Yes* Yes* No Yes†

* Material must be handled in accordance with OSHA Standard 29 CFR 1926.1101 and 29 CFR 1926.62 † Lead concentrations were also detected <1.0 mg/cm2 or <0.5% wt. which must be handled in accordance with OSHA Standard 29 CFR 1926.62

7.1 Asbestos-Containing Materials

A total of 91 samples were collected from 22 identified homogeneous areas and submitted for PLM, TEM, and/or Point Count Procedure analysis. Analytical results of the samples revealed that none of 22 homogeneous areas sampled contained greater than 1% asbestos by PLM. Two homogeneous areas were not sampled and are assumed to contain asbestos until sampled, which included fire doors and gaskets.

Asbestos-Containing Material and Lead-Based Paint Re-Inspection Report; Aerostar Job Number M3010.1653.0001.17 Page 13

Gaskets are NESHAP Category I non-friable ACMs. NESHAP Category I non-friable ACMs are not required to be removed prior to demolition or renovation of the building, provided that wet-demolition practices are implemented and resulting debris from the building is properly transported to a landfill permitted for disposal of ACMs. If NESHAP Category I non-friable ACMs are in poor condition or become friable during demolition, the material must be treated as a RACM and be removed by a licensed asbestos abatement contractor and disposed of at a class one landfill prior to renovation, remodeling, or demolition of the building.

Fire doors are NESHAP Category II non-friable ACMs. NESHAP Category II non-friable ACMs should be removed by a licensed asbestos abatement contractor following OSHA Class II work activities and disposed of at a class one landfill prior to renovation, remodeling, or demolition of the building. If proper precautions and work practices are to be utilized, accompanied by wet demolition, to prevent Category II non-friable ACMs from becoming crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder during demolition activities, the material is not required to be removed prior to demolition.

Due to the presence of asbestos, OSHA’s Asbestos Standard for the Construction Industry (29 CFR 1926.1101) must be followed. SCDHEC should be notified in writing before a local building permit is granted for any building demolition or renovation which would disturb asbestos material.

Transportation of ACM should be conducted in accordance with Department of Transportation (DOT) regulations outlined in 49 CFR 173.216. ACM must be disposed of at a facility permitted by the EPA and SCDHEC to accept asbestos.

In accordance with the OSHA Asbestos Standard for the Construction Industry (29 CFR 1926.1101), demolition of a building with ACM left in place falls under the definition of removal of installed ACM. The removal of installed ACM is either Class I or Class II asbestos work, and all applicable requirements of this standard apply. Whether such demolition is Class I asbestos work or Class II asbestos work is determined by the type of ACM left in place. If any asbestos-containing thermal system insulation or surfacing material is left installed in the building, then the work being performed is Class I asbestos work. If the ACM left installed in the building does not include any thermal system insulation or surfacing material, then the work being performed is Class II asbestos work.

Suspect ACMs encountered during renovation/demolition activities that are not identified in this survey should be assumed to contain asbestos or be sampled by a RIDH-licensed asbestos inspector and analyzed by an accredited laboratory.

7.2 Lead-Based Paint

HUD guidelines state that paint containing a lead concentration greater than or equal to 1.0 mg/cm2 of lead by XRF or 0.5% wt. by laboratory analysis is considered to be LBP. XRF sample results were equal to or greater than 1.0 mg/cm2 in one XRF sample collected. Detectable concentrations of lead below the level which HUD defines as LBP (1.0 mg/cm2) were recorded in 33 XRF samples collected. One paint chip sample collected was found to contain a lead concentration below 0.5%

wt. If surfaces of building components with detectable concentrations of lead are subjected to cutting, abrading, welding, scraping, and/or sanding, controls should be implemented to prevent worker exposure to airborne lead concentrations.

Asbestos-Containing Material and Lead-Based Paint Re-Inspection Report; Aerostar Job Number M3010.1653.0001.17 Page 14

Based on OSHA’s Lead in Construction Standard, worker protection controls must be implemented for coatings with any detectable concentrations of lead. HUD’s definition of LBP cannot be used to determine safe working conditions under OSHA. OSHA’s Lead in Construction Standard, 29 CFR 1926.62, was intended to apply to any detectable concentration of lead in paint by laboratory analysis. OSHA’s only accepted methodology for determining an employee’s exposure to airborne lead contaminants is through personal air monitoring. Any paint with detectable concentrations of lead, by XRF or laboratory analysis, that is subjected to cutting, abrading, welding, scraping, and/or sanding, must be handled in accordance with 29 CFR 1926.62, to prevent employee exposure.

TABLES

TABLE 1

SUMMARY OF ASBESTOS SURVEY

Building 2100 Fort Jackson

Columbia, Richland County, South Carolina

NF Cat. I - Non-Friable Category I ACM ND - None Detected NF Cat. II - Non-Friable Category II ACM SF - Square Feet RACM - Regulated Asbestos Containing Material LF - Linear Feet Page 1 of 3

Homogeneous Sample ID Material Description Location Approximate

Amount

Number of Samples Collected

(PLM/TEM)

Asbestos Type % NESHAP Category Condition

2100-1-1, 2100-1-2, 2100-1-3, 2100-1-4* 4" Vinyl Cove Base - Black Throughout Second Floor 3,780 SF 3/1 ND *Verified by

TEM -- Fair

2100-1-1A, 2100-1- 2A, 2100-1-3A, 2100-

1-4A*

Tan Mastic associated with 4" Vinyl Cove Base - Black Throughout Second Floor 3,780 SF 3/1 ND *Verified by

TEM -- Fair

2100-2-1, 2100-2-2, 2100-2-3, 2100-2-4*

12"x12" Vinyl Floor Tile (VFT) - White with Black

Brush

Throughout First and Second Floors 45,000 SF 3/1 ND *Verified by

TEM -- Fair

2100-2-1A, 2100-2- 2A, 2100-2-3A, 2100-

2-4A*

Black/Tan Mastic associated with 12"x12" VFT - White with Black Brush

Throughout First and Second Floors 45,000 SF 3/1 ND *Verified by

TEM -- Fair

2100-3-1, 2100-3-2, 2100-3-3, 2100-3-3*

12"x12" VFT - Black with White Brush

First and Second Floor Hallways 3,000 SF 3/1 ND *Verified by

TEM -- Fair

2100-3-1A, 2100-3- 2A, 2100-3-3A, 2100-

3-3A*

Black Mastic associated with 12"x12" VFT - Black with White Brush

First and Second Floor Hallways 3,000 SF 3/1 ND *Verified by

TEM -- Fair

2100-4-1, 2100-4-2, 2100-4-3

2'x2' Ceiling Tile - White with Pinhole and Fissures

Throughout Building Interior 47,000 SF 3 ND *Verified by

TEM -- Fair

2100-5-1, 2100-5-2, 2100-5-3, 2100-5-4*

Heating Ventilation and Air- Conditioning (HVAC)

Mastic - White

Mechanical Room Handler and Plenum 1,050 SF 3/1 ND *Verified by

TEM -- Fair

2100-6-1, 2100-6-2, 2100-6-3, 2100-6-4*

Fiberglass Thermal Systems Insulation (TSI) Canvas with Mastic -White

Fittings, Second Floor Mechanical Rooms #1 and

#2 240 SF 3/1 ND *Verified by

TEM -- Good

Building 2100 Fort Jackson

Columbia, Richland County, South Carolina

NF Cat. I - Non-Friable Category I ACM ND - None Detected NF Cat. II - Non-Friable Category II ACM SF - Square Feet RACM - Regulated Asbestos Containing Material LF - Linear Feet Page 2 of 3

Homogeneous Sample ID Material Description Location Approximate

Amount

Number of Samples Collected

(PLM/TEM)

Asbestos Type % NESHAP Category Condition

2100-7-1, 2100-7-2, 2100-7-3, 2100-7-4* TSI Mastic - White

Straight Runs, Second Floor Mechanical Rooms #1 and

#2 600 SF 3/1 ND *Verified by

TEM -- Fair

2100-8-1, 2100-8-2, 2100-8-3, 2100-8-4*

Caulk/Putty - Red with Black Specks

Second Floor Mechanical Rooms #1 and #2, Conduit

Wall Penetrations 2 SF 3/1 ND *Verified by

TEM -- Fair

2100-9-1, 2100-9-2, 2100-9-3, 2100-9-4* Mastic-Red

Metal Ducts in Second Floor Mechanical Rooms #1 and

#2 and Vehicle Maintenance Shops

500 SF 3/1 ND *Verified by TEM -- Fair

2100-10-1, 2100-10- 2, 2100-10-3, 2100-

10-4* Caulk/Putty - Green

Second Floor Mechanical Rooms #1 and #2, North

Wing, Conduit penetrations 5 SF 3/1 ND *Verified by

TEM -- Fair

2100-11-1, 2100-11- 2, 2100-11-3, 2100-

11-4*

12"x12" VFT - Tan with Gray Brush Rooms 239 and 240 300 SF 3/1 ND *Verified by

TEM -- Fair

2100-11-1A, 2100-11- 2A, 2100-11-3A, 2100-11-4A*

Black Mastic associated with 12"x12" VFT - Tan with Gray Brush Rooms 239 and 240 300 SF 3/1 ND *Verified by

TEM -- Fair

2100-12-1, 2100-12- 2, 2100-12-3, 2100-

12-4, 2100-12-5 Skim Coat

Second Floor Exterior Walls in Rooms 205, 208, 217, 218, 228, 229, 247, and 250 3,500 SF 5 ND -- Fair

2100-13-1, 2100-13- 2, 2100-13-3 Fire Proofing- Gray Northern and Southern

Stairwells 450 SF 3 ND -- Fair

Building 2100 Fort Jackson

Columbia, Richland County, South Carolina

NF Cat. I - Non-Friable Category I ACM ND - None Detected NF Cat. II - Non-Friable Category II ACM SF - Square Feet RACM - Regulated Asbestos Containing Material LF -…