Attachment IX - 2100 Asbestos Report 4-6-12_20200901.pdf
PDF 2 MB Posted
- Attached to
- IMCOM_DPW_MATOC
- Solicitation number
- W9124C20R0007
About this file
This is a draft solicitation for an Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Multiple Award Task Order Contract (MATOC) for facility repairs, renovations, and construction services at Fort Jackson in South Carolina. The contract will have a one-year base period and four one-year options periods, running from September 2020 through September 2025. Services include administrative facilities, maintenance shops, child development centers, physical fitness centers, food service facilities, airfield structures, roads, athletic fields, bridges, underground and overhead utilities, gates, warehouses, and auditoriums. Incidental design, testing, studies, surveys, and abatement for lead-based paint or asbestos containing materials may also be required. Projects may need to be developed from a conceptual idea. The contract will be awarded on a firm-fixed price basis. The primary NAICS code is 236220 and the size standard is $36.5 million. This procurement is set aside as a HubZone small business solicitation. A site visit will be held on February 11, 2020 for the sample project, which will be used for pricing. Interested parties should register by February 7 and provide identification information for access to Fort Jackson. The final solicitation will be posted to SAM.gov.
View the file
Other files
Show all 30
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
S&ME, INC. / 301 Zima Park Drive / Spartanburg, SC 29301 / p 864.574.2360 / f 864.576.8730 / www.smeinc.com S&ME, INC. / 281 Fairforest Way / Greenville, SC 29607 / p 864.297.9944
April 6, 2012
US&S, Inc.
50 Grand Avenue Greenville, South Carolina 29607
Attention: Mr. Robert Reid
Reference: Asbestos Evaluation Report Building 2100 Fort Jackson Facility Fort Jackson, South Carolina S&ME Project Number: 1265-11-452 Ft Jackson Contract: W9124C-11-C-0020
Dear Mr. Ried:
S&ME, Inc. (S&ME) has completed an asbestos evaluation of the referenced structure.
The attached report presents the findings of S&ME’s asbestos evaluation. The purpose of the evaluation was to update previous asbestos reports to meet current regulations. This service was performed in general accordance with our Proposal 11-841 and our Agreement for Services AS-071.
S&ME appreciates the opportunity to provide asbestos evaluation services for this project. Please contact us at your convenience if there are questions regarding the information contained in this report.
Sincerely, S&ME, Inc.
Jeff Gurrie George Flores Industrial Hygiene Project Manager Senior Environmental Professional
Attachment: Asbestos Evaluation Report
JG/GF S:\ENVIRON\2011\1265\6511452 Ft Jackson\Buildings 2000-2499\2100\2100 Asbestos Report.doc
ASBESTOS EVALUATION REPORT
BUILDING 2100
FORT JACKSON, SOUTH CAROLINA
Ft Jackson Contract W9124C-11-C-0020
S&ME Project No. 1265-11-452
Prepared By:
281 Fairforest Way Greenville South Carolina 29607
Ph: 864-297-9944 Fax: 864-297-0462
By: Jeff Gurrie jgurrie@smeinc.com
SCDHEC Asbestos Inspector License No. 22352
Evaluation Performed on January 4, 2012 Reported on April 6, 2012
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page No.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Purpose
1.2 Scope of Services
1.3 Limitations
1.4 Special Terms, Conditions and Reliance
2.0 EVALUATION PROCEDURES
3.0 STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION
4.0 FINDINGS
5.0 CONCLUSIONS / RECOMMENDATIONS
Appendix A: Figure 1: Building Sketch/Sample Locations Site Photographs
Appendix B: Table 1: Asbestos Results Summary
Appendix C: Laboratory Analysis
Appendix D: Asbestos Inspector License
Appendix E: Previous Inspection Report Data
Asbestos Evaluation Report S&ME Project No. 1265-11-452 Building 2100 / Fort Jackson, South Carolina April 2012
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
S&ME, Inc. (S&ME) has updated the asbestos evaluation of Building 2100 located at the Fort Jackson Facility in Fort Jackson, South Carolina. This Executive Summary is intended as an overview for the convenience of the reader. The complete report must be reviewed in its entirety prior to making decisions regarding this site.
S&ME has updated the previous asbestos evaluation of Building 2100. A total of 46 additional bulk samples of suspect asbestos-containing materials were collected from the structure. The bulk samples were analyzed for asbestos by Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM). In accordance with South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control (SCDHEC) Asbestos Regulation 61-86.1, a representative sample of each non-friable, organically bound material which tested negative for asbestos by PLM were further analyzed by Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM).
Building 2100 is an approximate 36,600 square foot building on a concrete slab on grade foundation constructed with masonry walls and a metal roof. The HVAC ducts are insulated with fiberglass with white mastic on the seams. Piping is insulated with fiberglass. Suspect miscellaneous materials include floor tile, ceiling tile, vinyl cove base mastic, and mastics. Suspect surfacing material consists of drywall joint compound and fireproofing. No suspect thermal system insulation (TSI) was observed at the time of our evaluation. Non-suspect building materials include metal roof and wall system, ceramic tiles, fiberglass insulation, concrete, and rubberized or silicone caulking. It appeared as if flooring materials had been replaced and the chiller unit updated since the last evaluation (2007).
Figures 1 and 2, Building Sketch/Sample Locations and site photographs are provided in Appendix A. Table 1, Asbestos Results Summary in Appendix B presents a summary of the suspect materials, material friability, condition, potential for disturbance, approximate quantity, and asbestos analysis of the samples collected or presumed to contain asbestos.
No asbestos was detected in the samples of suspect materials collected.
The black 12-inch floor tile could not be sampled due to its location in the center of the hallways. This material should be sampled prior to disturbance.
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Purpose
S&ME was retained to perform an update to a previous asbestos evaluation of Building 2100 located at Fort Jackson in South Carolina. The information presented in the previous evaluation report was updated in order to be compliant with Section VI.A.6 of South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control (SCDHEC) Asbestos Regulation 61-86.1. S&ME performed the evaluation on January 4, 2012.
1.2 Scope of Services
The scope of this evaluation is limited to the sections of the structure that were accessible to S&ME at the time of our evaluation. The scope of our services does not include a pre-project evaluation where destructive actions are necessary to determine if other materials are concealed behind finish materials. Additional suspect materials may be located in areas not readily accessible. For example, mastics located in between exterior brick and structural block, in confined spaces, materials located underground, or materials covered by newer materials. This evaluation did not include disassembling any building materials or equipment.
1.3 Limitations
This report has been prepared in accordance with generally accepted practice for specific application to this project. The conclusions and/or recommendations contained in this report are based on our understanding of the applicable standards at the time this report was prepared. No other warranty, express or implied, is made.
The findings of the asbestos evaluation are based largely on visual observations. The findings do not warrant that all asbestos-containing materials have been identified;
asbestos-containing materials could be present in areas not readily accessible to observation. In addition, the actual locations and quantities of materials determined to contain asbestos may vary from those herein. Apparent homogeneous sampling areas may vary in actual asbestos content due to previous renovations, maintenance, or related operations.
As part of our evaluation, S&ME has relied on previous asbestos reports prepared by Geo-Systems Design & Testing, Inc. provided to us by Fort Jackson. Data presented in the previous reports were utilized, in part, by S&ME when performing our update and in generating the conclusions and recommendations presented herein. We have made the fundamental assumption that this historical data is accurate and reliable and that the samples were collected and analyzed in accordance with the applicable Federal and State regulations in force at the time of sample collection; however, as S&ME was not responsible for performing the prior building evaluations we, therefore, make no claim as to the accuracy of the findings and conclusions presented therein and we will not be liable for errors in, or resulting from the use of, these reports.
If additional suspect materials are found, our firm should be notified so that our findings can be reviewed for modification or verification.
1.4 Special Terms, Conditions and Reliance
This assessment was performed on behalf of US&S for the exclusive use of Fort Jackson.
No other company, entity, or person shall have any rights with regard to S&ME’s contract with US&S, including but not limited to indemnification by S&ME, or any rights of reliance on the findings, conclusions and recommendations of this or any subsequent reports issued by S&ME regarding the referenced site. The results presented in this report are indicative of conditions only during the time of the evaluation and of the specific areas referenced. The information provided in this report should not be used as a bidding document.
2.0 EVALUATION PROCEDURES
The asbestos evaluation process focused on reviewing previous reports and attempted to verify the location, quantity, and condition of the homogeneous areas of suspect materials identified therein; homogeneous areas are defined as areas which are uniform by color, texture, construction and/or application date, and general appearance. Previous inspection reports were reviewed for compliance with current SCDHEC regulations and additional samples of suspect materials were collected and analyzed for asbestos when necessary.
Bulk sampling was conducted by Mr. Jeff Gurrie, a South Carolina licensed asbestos inspector. A copy of Mr. Gurrie’s license is provided in Appendix D. Each sample was extracted with a pre-cleaned sampling instrument then placed in a plastic bag. Each bag was numbered and data (including sample number, sample location, type of suspect material, and material condition) was recorded. The bulk samples were submitted through chain-of-custody procedures to SAI’s asbestos laboratory in Greensboro, North Carolina for analysis of asbestos type and content by Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) and analysis of asbestos type and content by Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM).
This laboratory is accredited by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP).
The samples were analyzed by a trained microscopist utilizing PLM coupled with dispersion staining in accordance with EPA Method 600/R-93/116 and 600/M4-82-020.
The USEPA recognizes a material as containing asbestos if an asbestos content of greater than one percent (>1%) is detected in a representative sample. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) recognizes a material as containing asbestos if any asbestos, regardless of content, is detected in a representative sample.
In accordance with SCDHEC Regulation 61-86.1, additional sample analysis, if necessary, was performed on one (1) representative sample in each homogeneous group of an organically bound material which did not contain asbestos as tested by the PLM method. The additional analysis was performed by TEM in accordance with Chatfield Method SOP 1988-02 Rev. 1. TEM can identify asbestos when fiber sizes are extremely small or if they are bound in a resinous material, for example, floor tile, mastic or asphaltic roofing.
3.0 STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION
Building 2100 is an approximate 36,600 square foot building on a concrete slab on grade foundation constructed with masonry walls and a metal roof. The HVAC ducts are insulated with fiberglass with white mastic on the seams. Piping is insulated with fiberglass. Suspect miscellaneous materials include floor tile, ceiling tile, vinyl cove base mastic, and mastics. Suspect surfacing material consists of drywall joint compound and fireproofing. No suspect thermal system insulation (TSI) was observed at the time of our evaluation. Non-suspect building materials include metal roof and wall system, ceramic tiles, fiberglass insulation, concrete, and rubberized or silicone caulking. It appeared as if flooring materials had been replaced and the chiller unit updated since the last evaluation (2007).
Figures 1 and 2 in Appendix A provide a general building sketch. Site photographs are also provided.
4.0 FINDINGS
A total of 46 additional bulk samples of suspect asbestos-containing materials were collected from the structure. Figure 1 in Appendix A provides a general building sketch with sample locations. S&ME has also included previous sampling data from other firms where applicable. Site photographs are also provided. Sample descriptions, location, and analytical results are listed in Table 1, Asbestos Results Summary Table in Appendix B.
Laboratory sample analysis and chain-of-custody forms for the suspect samples collected are included in the Appendix C. Additionally, copies of previous reports provided to, and utilized by, S&ME as part of this update are included in Appendix E.
No asbestos was detected in the samples of suspect materials collected.
The black 12-inch floor tile could not be sampled due to its location in the center of the hallways. This material should be sampled prior to disturbance.
5.0 CONCLUSIONS / RECOMMENDATIONS
No asbestos was detected in the suspect materials collected.
The black 12-inch floor tile could not be sampled due to its location in the center of the hallways. This material should be sampled prior to disturbance.
The scope of this evaluation is limited to the sections of the structure that were accessible to S&ME at the time of our evaluation. The scope of our services does not include a pre-project evaluation where destructive actions are necessary to determine if other materials are concealed behind finish materials. Additional suspect materials may be located in areas not readily accessible. For example, mastics located in between exterior brick and structural block, in confined spaces, materials located underground, or materials covered by newer materials. This evaluation did not include disassembling any building materials or equipment. If additional suspect materials are discovered during maintenance, renovation, or demolition activities, bulk samples must be collected and analyzed for asbestos content prior to continuation of work.
APPENDIX A
Building Sketch/Sample Locations Site Photographs
FIGURE NO.
1DRAWN BY: JAG
S&ME Project No. 1265-11-452
CHECKED BY: GKF Building 2100 Ft. Jackson, South Carolina
SCALE: NTS General Building Sketch
DATE: 2/11/2012
H
H
I1 I2 I3
D
D
D
G
A 1
C
C
NTS General Building Sketch
DATE: 2/11/2012 S&ME Project No. 1265-11-452
FIGURE NO.
CHECKED BY: GKF Building 2100 2DRAWN BY: JAG Ft. Jackson, South Carolina
SCALE:
B
F
D
J3
G 1 G
F
J2
A
J1
A
B
H
E
F
D
C
E
F
E 2 F
F
F
Building 2100 Fort Jackson, South Carolina
S&ME Project # 1265-11-452
Taken by: JAG Date Taken: 1/4/2012
1 Building 2100 2 Ceiling tile with deep birdwing pattern
3 Ceiling tile with shallow birdwing pattern 4 White mastic on ducts
5 Fireproofing 6 Red mastic on ducts
7 Base cove mastic 8 White mastic on piping
9 Black mastic on exterior chiller piping 10 12-Inch white floor tile –gray accent w/ black mastic
No Photo
11 Black floor tile in center of hallways not sampled 12
APPENDIX B
Asbestos Results Summary
2100-A-1 PLM
2100-A-2 PLM
2100-A-3 PLM
2100-B-1 PLM
2100-B-2 PLM
2100-B-3 PLM
2100-C-1 PLM
2100-C-2 PLM
2100-C-3 TEM
2100-D-1 PLM
2100-D-2 PLM
2100-D-3 PLM
2100-D-4 PLM
2100-D-5 PLM
2100-E-1 PLM
2100-E-2 PLM
2100-E-3 TEM
2100-F-1 PLM
2100-F-2 PLM
2100-F-3 PLM
2100-F-4 PLM
2100-F-5 PLM
2100-F-6 PLM
2100-F-7 PLM
2100-G-1 PLM
2100-G-2 PLM
2100-G-3 TEM
NAD Base Cove Mastic G Miscellaneous
LPD
1,200
3,800
Non-Friable
SF
SF
SF
SFNAD Red Mastic on Ducts E Miscellaneous Non-Friable Good
Good LPD
NAD Spray-Applied Fireproofing D Surfacing Friable Good PD
Analytical Results
NAD White Mastic on Ducts C Miscellaneous
Sample Description Homogeneous
Area Classification
Friable / Non-Friable
TABLE 1
ASBESTOS RESULTS SUMMARY
BUILDING 2100
FT. JACKSON
Sample Number
Analysis Method
Current Condition
Potential for Disturbance
Estimated Quantity
NAD
2'x'2 Ceiling Tile Light Birdwing
Pattern (patched tile) B Miscellaneous Friable Good PD
S&ME PROJECT NO. 1265-11-452
NAD
2'X2' Ceiling Tile Deep Birdwing
Pattern (main tile) A Miscellaneous Friable Good PD 50,000 SF
>5,000 SF
Non-Friable Good LPD 5,000
Drywall - NAD Joint Compound - NAD
Drywall & Joint Compound F Surfacing Friable Good PD
LF
Analytical Results Sample Description Homogeneous
Area Classification
Friable / Non-Friable
TABLE 1
ASBESTOS RESULTS SUMMARY
BUILDING 2100
FT. JACKSON
Sample Number
Analysis Method
Current Condition
Potential for Disturbance
Estimated Quantity
S&ME PROJECT NO. 1265-11-452
2100-H-1 PLM
2100-H-2 PLM
2100-H-3 TEM
2100-I-1 PLM
2100-I-2 PLM
2100-I-3 TEM
2100-J-1 PLM
2100-J-2 PLM
2100-J-3 TEM
NAD - No Asbestos Detected PLM - Polarized Light Microscopy TEM - Transmission Electron Microscopy
NOTE: Quantities listed above are estimates to be used for inspection purposes only. Quantities should be field verified for all other uses. Approximate sample locations are noted on Figures 1 & 2.
LPD - Low potential for disturbance PD - Potential for disturbance PSD - Potential of significant disturbance
SF - square feet LF - linear feet CF - cubic feet
Good LPD SF
NAD
Black Mastic on Exterior Chiller
Piping I Miscellaneous
NAD White Mastic on Piping H Miscellaneous Non-Friable
12-Inch White Floor Tile - Gray Accent w/ Black Mastic
J Miscellaneous Non-Friable Good PD
20,000
1,100--- 12-Inch Black Floor Tile in Center of Hallway K Miscellaneous
Non-Friable Good SF
SF
SFNot Sampled --- Non-Friable Good PD
LPD
Tile - NAD Mastic - NAD
APPENDIX C
Laboratory Analysis Results
Lab Order ID: 1200252
Project: 1265-11-452 / Ft Jackson - Building
Date Received: 1/9/2012
Date Reported: 1/13/2012
Sample ID
Lab Sample ID
Description
Lab Notes Asbestos
Fibrous Components
Non-Fibrous Components
Attributes
Treatment
Bulk Asbestos Analysis By Polarized Light Microscopy
EPA Method: 600/R-93/116 and 600/M4-82-020
Attn: Jeff Gurrie Analysis ID: 1200252PLM
Customer: S&ME 281 Fairforest Way Greenville, SC 29607
2100-A-1 2x2 ceiling tile White Non Fibrous Homogeneous
Teased1200252PLM_1
40% 40%
Cellulose Fiber Glass
20% Other
None Detected
2100-A-2 2x2 ceiling tile White Non Fibrous Homogeneous
Teased1200252PLM_2
40% 40%
Cellulose Fiber Glass
20% Other
None Detected
2100-A-3 2x2 ceiling tile White Non Fibrous Homogeneous
Teased1200252PLM_3
40% 40%
Cellulose Fiber Glass
20% Other
None Detected
2100-B-1 2x2 ceiling tile (patched) White Non Fibrous Homogeneous
Teased1200252PLM_4
40% 40%
Cellulose Fiber Glass
20% Other
None Detected
2100-B-2 2x2 ceiling tile (patched) White Non Fibrous Homogeneous
Teased1200252PLM_5
40% 40%
Cellulose Fiber Glass
20% Other
None Detected
2100-B-3 2x2 ceiling tile (patched) White Non Fibrous Homogeneous
Teased1200252PLM_6
40% 40%
Cellulose Fiber Glass
20% Other
None Detected
2100-C-1 White mastic on duct White Non Fibrous Homogeneous
Dissolved1200252PLM_7
100% Other
None Detected
2100-C-2 White mastic on duct White Non Fibrous Homogeneous
Dissolved1200252PLM_8
100% Other
None Detected
Nathaniel Durham, MS or Approved SignatoryAnalyst
Scientific Analytical Institute, Inc. 302-L Pomona Dr. Greensboro, NC 27407 (336) 292-3888
Disclaimer: Due to the nature of the EPA 600 method, asbestos may not be detected in samples containing low levels of asbestos. We strongly recommended that analysis of floor tiles, vermiculite, and/or heterogeneous soil samples be conducted by TEM for confirmation of “None Detected” by PLM. This report relates only to the samples tested and may not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of SAI. This report may not be used by the client to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U.S. government. Estimated MDL is 0.1%.
Bart Huber (39)
Date Received: 1/9/2012
Date Reported: 1/13/2012
Sample ID
Lab Sample ID
Description
Lab Notes Asbestos
Fibrous Components
Non-Fibrous Components
Attributes
Treatment
Bulk Asbestos Analysis By Polarized Light Microscopy
EPA Method: 600/R-93/116 and 600/M4-82-020
Attn: Jeff Gurrie Analysis ID: 1200252PLM
Customer: S&ME 281 Fairforest Way Greenville, SC 29607
2100-D-1 Spray applied fire proofing Gray Non Fibrous Homogeneous
Crushed1200252PLM_9
10% Cellulose 90% Other
None Detected
2100-D-2 Spray applied fire proofing Gray Non Fibrous Homogeneous
Crushed1200252PLM_10
10% Cellulose 90% Other
None Detected
2100-D-3 Spray applied fire proofing Gray Non Fibrous Homogeneous
Crushed1200252PLM_11
10% Cellulose 90% Other
None Detected
2100-D-4 Spray applied fire proofing Gray Non Fibrous Homogeneous
Crushed1200252PLM_12
10% Cellulose 90% Other
None Detected
2100-D-5 Spray applied fire proofing
1200252PLM_13
Not Submitted
2100-E-1 Red mastic on duct Red Non Fibrous Homogeneous
Dissolved1200252PLM_14
100% Other
None Detected
2100-E-2 Red mastic on duct Red Non Fibrous Homogeneous
Dissolved1200252PLM_15
100% Other
None Detected
2100-F-1 - A Drywall joint compound drywall
Brown, White Non Fibrous Heterogeneous
Crushed1200252PLM_16
12% Cellulose 88% Other
None Detected
Nathaniel Durham, MS or Approved SignatoryAnalyst
Scientific Analytical Institute, Inc. 302-L Pomona Dr. Greensboro, NC 27407 (336) 292-3888
Disclaimer: Due to the nature of the EPA 600 method, asbestos may not be detected in samples containing low levels of asbestos. We strongly recommended that analysis of floor tiles, vermiculite, and/or heterogeneous soil samples be conducted by TEM for confirmation of “None Detected” by PLM. This report relates only to the samples tested and may not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of SAI. This report may not be used by the client to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U.S. government. Estimated MDL is 0.1%.
Date Received: 1/9/2012
Date Reported: 1/13/2012
Sample ID
Lab Sample ID
Description
Lab Notes Asbestos
Fibrous Components
Non-Fibrous Components
Attributes
Treatment
Bulk Asbestos Analysis By Polarized Light Microscopy
EPA Method: 600/R-93/116 and 600/M4-82-020
Attn: Jeff Gurrie Analysis ID: 1200252PLM
Customer: S&ME 281 Fairforest Way Greenville, SC 29607
2100-F-1 - B Drywall joint compound joint compound
White Non Fibrous Homogeneous
Crushed1200252PLM_31
100% Other
None Detected
2100-F-2 - A Drywall joint compound drywall
Brown, White Non Fibrous Heterogeneous
Crushed1200252PLM_17
12% Cellulose 88% Other
None Detected
2100-F-2 - B Drywall joint compound joint compound
White Non Fibrous Homogeneous
Crushed1200252PLM_32
100% Other
None Detected
2100-F-3 - A Drywall joint compound drywall
Brown, White Non Fibrous Heterogeneous
Crushed1200252PLM_18
12% Cellulose 88% Other
None Detected
2100-F-3 - B Drywall joint compound joint compound
White Non Fibrous Homogeneous
Crushed1200252PLM_33
100% Other
None Detected
2100-F-4 - A Drywall joint compound drywall
Brown, White Non Fibrous Heterogeneous
Crushed1200252PLM_19
12% Cellulose 88% Other
None Detected
2100-F-4 - B Drywall joint compound joint compound
White Non Fibrous Homogeneous
Crushed1200252PLM_34
100% Other
None Detected
2100-F-5 - A Drywall joint compound drywall
Brown, White Non Fibrous Heterogeneous
Crushed1200252PLM_20
12% Cellulose 88% Other
None Detected
Nathaniel Durham, MS or Approved SignatoryAnalyst
Scientific Analytical Institute, Inc. 302-L Pomona Dr. Greensboro, NC 27407 (336) 292-3888
Disclaimer: Due to the nature of the EPA 600 method, asbestos may not be detected in samples containing low levels of asbestos. We strongly recommended that analysis of floor tiles, vermiculite, and/or heterogeneous soil samples be conducted by TEM for confirmation of “None Detected” by PLM. This report relates only to the samples tested and may not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of SAI. This report may not be used by the client to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U.S. government. Estimated MDL is 0.1%.
Date Received: 1/9/2012
Date Reported: 1/13/2012
Sample ID
Lab Sample ID
Description
Lab Notes Asbestos
Fibrous Components
Non-Fibrous Components
Attributes
Treatment
Bulk Asbestos Analysis By Polarized Light Microscopy
EPA Method: 600/R-93/116 and 600/M4-82-020
Attn: Jeff Gurrie Analysis ID: 1200252PLM
Customer: S&ME 281 Fairforest Way Greenville, SC 29607
2100-F-5 - B Drywall joint compound joint compound
White Non Fibrous Homogeneous
Crushed1200252PLM_35
100% Other
None Detected
2100-F-6 - A Drywall joint compound drywall
Brown, White Non Fibrous Heterogeneous
Crushed1200252PLM_21
12% Cellulose 88% Other
None Detected
2100-F-6 - B Drywall joint compound joint compound
White Non Fibrous Homogeneous
Crushed1200252PLM_36
100% Other
None Detected
2100-F-7 - A Drywall joint compound drywall
Brown, White Non Fibrous Heterogeneous
Crushed1200252PLM_22
12% Cellulose 88% Other
None Detected
2100-F-7 - B Drywall joint compound joint compound
White Non Fibrous Homogeneous
Crushed1200252PLM_37
100% Other
None Detected
2100-G-1 Base cove mastic Cream Non Fibrous Homogeneous
Dissolved1200252PLM_23
100% Other
None Detected
2100-G-2 Base cove mastic Cream Non Fibrous Homogeneous
Dissolved1200252PLM_24
100% Other
None Detected
2100-H-1 White mastic on piping White Non Fibrous Homogeneous
Dissolved1200252PLM_25
100% Other
None Detected
Nathaniel Durham, MS or Approved SignatoryAnalyst
Scientific Analytical Institute, Inc. 302-L Pomona Dr. Greensboro, NC 27407 (336) 292-3888
Disclaimer: Due to the nature of the EPA 600 method, asbestos may not be detected in samples containing low levels of asbestos. We strongly recommended that analysis of floor tiles, vermiculite, and/or heterogeneous soil samples be conducted by TEM for confirmation of “None Detected” by PLM. This report relates only to the samples tested and may not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of SAI. This report may not be used by the client to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U.S. government. Estimated MDL is 0.1%.
Date Received: 1/9/2012
Date Reported: 1/13/2012
Sample ID
Lab Sample ID
Description
Lab Notes Asbestos
Fibrous Components
Non-Fibrous Components
Attributes
Treatment
Bulk Asbestos Analysis By Polarized Light Microscopy
EPA Method: 600/R-93/116 and 600/M4-82-020
Attn: Jeff Gurrie Analysis ID: 1200252PLM
Customer: S&ME 281 Fairforest Way Greenville, SC 29607
2100-H-2 White mastic on piping White Non Fibrous Homogeneous
Dissolved1200252PLM_26
100% Other
None Detected
2100-I-1 Black mastic on ext piping of chiller
Black Non Fibrous Heterogeneous
Dissolved1200252PLM_27
10% Cellulose 90% Other
None Detected
2100-I-2 Black mastic on ext piping of chiller
Black Non Fibrous Heterogeneous
Dissolved1200252PLM_28
10% Cellulose 90% Other
None Detected
2100-J-1 - A 12" white floor tile w/ gray specks tile
White Non Fibrous Homogeneous
Dissolved1200252PLM_29
100% Other
None Detected
2100-J-1 - B 12" white floor tile w/ gray specks mastic
Black Non Fibrous Homogeneous
Dissolved1200252PLM_38
3% Cellulose 97% Other
None Detected
2100-J-2 - A 12" white floor tile w/ gray specks tile
White Non Fibrous Homogeneous
Dissolved1200252PLM_30
100% Other
None Detected
2100-J-2 - B 12" white floor tile w/ gray specks mastic
Black Non Fibrous Homogeneous
Dissolved1200252PLM_39
3% Cellulose 97% Other
None Detected
Nathaniel Durham, MS or Approved SignatoryAnalyst
Scientific Analytical Institute, Inc. 302-L Pomona Dr. Greensboro, NC 27407 (336) 292-3888
Disclaimer: Due to the nature of the EPA 600 method, asbestos may not be detected in samples containing low levels of asbestos. We strongly recommended that analysis of floor tiles, vermiculite, and/or heterogeneous soil samples be conducted by TEM for confirmation of “None Detected” by PLM. This report relates only to the samples tested and may not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of SAI. This report may not be used by the client to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U.S. government. Estimated MDL is 0.1%.
Scientific Analytical Institute 302-L Pomona Dr. Greensboro, NC 21401
Phone: 336.292.3888 Fax: 336.292.33J3 www.sailab.comlab((JJsallab.com
Company: S&ME, Inc. Contact: Jeff Gurrie
Address: 281 Fairforest Way PhoneD:
Greenville, SC 29607 FaxD:
Email [!]:jgurrie@smeinc.com
Contact: 3 Hours
Address: 6 Hours
12 Hours
24 Hours
Positive stop
PLM Point Count
PCM NIOSH 7400
TEM AHERA
TEM Levell!
TEM NIOSH 7402
TEM Bulk Qualitative
TEM Bulk Chatfield
TEM Bulk Quantitative
TEM Wipe ASTM 06480-99
TEM Microvac ASTM 05755-0
TEM Water EPA 100.2
Other:
• D D DPO Number:
DProjeet~am~umber: 1265-11-452 / Ft. Jackson - Building Qt/~
:w..r~:mi)~ . :-~~:~
I
SampleID# DeseriptioDlLocatioD VolumtlAQa. ;C~..mentl ";;;J - /J~ I J-~1- tJ£/t. Jx..Y..y "t<.-E j/ A-.? tJI.]';'job?'\. £" ~~ P Il'~ ,.!2X:J... J) P ~-, I{)ta U', 1...1AX;. T t J...,E L:fJA- fCJ/;t;?>" V A-:t- I\. P...
&.-j ,t, "1·'/ 11..-1 VH i Ie M,A~It, L ou'tnU:...T r;.;
/J.,-1--
I«.. f..J a-3 1\
'U--l ~WfA.\.f -APPle;» P:; /lIE Plop I=IJiG t!
2.
.s
,""' ..6 i t:
I t:
\ (-1
T,O",ta,1,.,#,O.f'Sl·aml..n,.~,.,Pa.,.,;:,.S,"",.,a-"e!J.
Page-'-of~ Scientific Analytical Institute ' ~~
'1Ifa.twt r www.sailab.comlab((JJsallab.com
Scientific Analytical Institute 302-L Pomona Dr. Greensboro, NC 27407 Phone: 336.292.3888 Fax: 336.292.3313
6,/ www.sailab.com/abOsallab.com
'mil.·:; ,;;:' .... .../' ." '.'" ?;;;~:~, 7,':
reD- £-1 R.tW 111 Asr {L 42A1 ;:P t.J.{J T
'e·~?~ " ~t ;t)~" I.JJJJ...L, :\OiNi t7A~d J '.h r-.J \ j: .~ I J::..4 c ,,<.--"
":"0 F-/ &-1 fl.J.sc; (11)11& MJ..<"'{r 6-7 I <3"...-.5 l fI-; Ii)'"1'1'£ J'lIIA~TlC!.. "JJ ;JIjJ /Uc;, H~;J,- 1 J-I-~ J
1-L ~J.-l1tLK. hlA611L IJA,) IZxT iJli1ltJ &' :r.~;L I 6 P t1dJ JJ-.t-.c.
:r...~ I ~I'-( I!).. II ILJ t-< I r£. r- L-p~ 12.. T /t:r II V....tI<\y ,~ S-;z... l .:Sp'et!7c:~ c'"'f-- S (
~ ~ J" 11/1 n, '" 'tC-k'JII"';;:';
/I F' , . ......-.(t , l
1£.""1- I'C
.. ''I;;'" ~ll~i,~:~i!~
-r-;-"., P P f!
~j f../ t" '1''f,; ~ R.
1'
1" .::> P
I~ Q f.:.J
Page ;z.. of~ Scienti fic Analytical Institute
Project: 1265-11-452/Ft. Jackson -Building
Client: S&ME 281 Fairforest Way Greenville, SC 29607
Sample ID
Lab Sample ID
Description
Lab Notes Organic Acid Sol. Asbestos
Bulk Asbestos Analysis by Transmission Electron Microscopy
Semi-Quantitative Chatfield SOP 1988-02 Rev. 1
Lab Order ID: 1200262
Date Received: 1/9/2012
Date Reported: 1/12/2012
Analysis ID: 1200262_TBS Attn: Jeff Gurrie
(Wt. %) (Wt. %) (Wt. %)
LCL-UCL
(Wt. %)
2100-C-3 White mastic on duct
46% -% None Detected
1200262TBS_1
2100-E-3 Red mastic on duct
61% -% None Detected
1200262TBS_2
2100-G-3 Base cove mastic
47% -% None Detected
1200262TBS_3
2100-H-3 White mastic on piping
40.% -% None Detected
1200262TBS_4
2100-I-3 Black mastic on ext piping of chiller
82% -% None Detected
1200262TBS_5
2100-J-3A 12" white floor tile w/gray specks tile
10.% 89% None Detected
1200262TBS_6
2100-J-3B 12" white floor tile w/gray specks mastic
44% 27% None Detected
1200262TBS_7
Approved SignatoryAnalyst
Scientific Analytical Institute, Inc. 302-L Pomona Dr. Greensboro, NC 27407 (336) 292-3888
Matt Thomas (7)
Lab Order ID: 1204851
Date Received: 3/21/2012
Date Reported: 3/21/2012
Sample ID
Lab Sample ID
Description
Lab Notes Asbestos
Fibrous Components
Non-Fibrous Components
Attributes
Treatment
Bulk Asbestos Analysis By Polarized Light Microscopy
EPA Method: 600/R-93/116 and 600/M4-82-020
Attn: Jeff Gurrie Analysis ID: 1204851PLM
Customer: S&ME 281 Fairforest Way Greenville, SC 29607
D5 Fireproofing Gray Fibrous Heterogeneous
Teased1204851PLM_1
15% Cellulose 85% Other
None Detected
Nathaniel Durham, MS or Approved SignatoryAnalyst
Scientific Analytical Institute, Inc. 302-L Pomona Dr. Greensboro, NC 27407 (336) 292-3888
Disclaimer: Due to the nature of the EPA 600 method, asbestos may not be detected in samples containing low levels of asbestos. We strongly recommended that analysis of floor tiles, vermiculite, and/or heterogeneous soil samples be conducted by TEM for confirmation of “None Detected” by PLM. This report relates only to the samples tested and may not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of SAI. This report may not be used by the client to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U.S. government. Estimated MDL is 0.1%.
Dorlos Ammerman (1)
APPENDIX D
Asbestos Inspector License
APPENDIX E
Previous Asbestos Report Data
| ADPAFA.tmp |
| Word Bookmarks |
| OLE_LINK1 |
| OLE_LINK2 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .