Attachment V - PRS 20200721.doc
DOC document 33 KB Posted
- Attached to
- IMCOM_DPW_MATOC Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- W9124C20R0007
About this file
This document contains a project reference sheet template and information on an upcoming federal contract opportunity for real property repair and construction services. The project reference sheet is a template for offerors to provide experience information on up to five relevant past projects, including details on work performed, schedule adherence, cost control, quality, and project management. The federal contract opportunity is a draft solicitation from the Mission and Installation Contracting Command Fort Jackson to establish a multiple award task order contract for a broad range of real property repair and construction services at Fort Jackson. The anticipated period of performance is one base year and four option years. The NAICS code is 236220 and it is set aside as a HubZone small business solicitation. A non-mandatory site visit will be held on February 11, 2020 for a sample project, with registration due by February 7. Interested parties should monitor the SAM website for solicitation details and amendments.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 30
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Project Reference Sheet (no more than five pages per project) **(To be completed by Offerors)**
1. Contract Number/Project No.:
2. Project Name & Client:
3. Location work was performed:
4. Date work was completed (must be within last 3 years):
5. Final cost of this project:
6. Clearly describe what part of the work performed by the firm for which experience information is submitted. Provide dollar magnitude for each of the following categories if multiple categories are selected:
a. Building renovations, including floors, doors, walls, windows and external facades:
b. Repair/replacement of major building systems such as electrical, mechanical and HVAC:
c. Civil work, including earthwork and drainage structures:
d. Environmental work:
7. Work was performed as a _____Prime _____Joint Venture _____Subcontractor
8. Timeline of performance
1. Was the project completed on schedule?
_____ Completed project prior to approved scheduled completion date.
_____ Completed project by original scheduled completion date.
_____ Failed to meet project completion date.
Comments:
2. Were contract delivery schedules adhered to at significant milestones?
____ Exceeded scheduled milestone requirements.
____ Delivered as scheduled but occasionally missed milestone dates.
____ Met scheduled milestone requirements.
Comments:
3. How responsive were you in addressing unforeseen/unanticipated conditions?
____ Consistently exercised a pro-active approach.
____ Demonstrated some initiative in exercising a pro-active approach.
____ Never demonstrated a pro-active approach.
Comments:
9. Cost Control –
1. Did you submit reasonably priced change proposals?
____ Contractor consistently submitted fair and reasonably priced change proposals. ____ Contractor typically submitted fair and reasonably priced change proposals. ____ Contractor submitted fair and reasonably priced proposals some of the time. ____ Contractor rarely submitted fair and reasonably priced change proposals.
Comments:
2. How well did the contractor manage cost throughout the life of the contract?
____ Contractor was extremely responsive in expediting proposal submissions.
____ Contractor was generally responsive in expediting proposal submissions ____ Contractor was sometimes responsive in timely submissions of change Proposals.
____ Contractor was nonresponsive in timely submissions of change proposals.
Comments:
10. Quality product
1. How well has the contractor complied with contract requirements?
____ Contractor exceeded contract requirements.
____ Contractor met the minimum requirements.
____ Contractor did not meet the minimum requirements.
Comments:
2. Did they conform to standards quality IT Services?
____ Contractor exceeded standards of good workmanship. ____ Contractor met the standards of good workmanship.
____ Contractor did not meet standards of good workmanship.
Comments:
Does the contractor have the ability to adapt to changing requirements while maintaining a desired level of quality?
____ Contractor was extremely effective in adapting to changing requirements. ____ Contractor was effective in adapting to changing requirements.
____ Contractor was ineffective in adapting to changing requirements.
Comments:
11. Project Management
1. Did the contractor manage project activities well, including managing internal staffing issues in a manner that delivered a quality product while minimizing the impact on the customer?
____ Contractor worked extremely well with the owner and the owner’s technical advisors) ____ Contractor was generally cooperative with the owner and the owner’s technical advisors. ____ Contractor did not work well with the owner and the owner’s technical advisors.
Comments:
2. Did the contractor work cooperatively with other vendors and Government staff to deliver a fully coordinated product?
____ Contractor was very cooperative.
____ Contractor was generally cooperative. ____ Contractor was not cooperative.
Comments:
3. Would you work with this contractor again or recommend this contractor for future projects?
__ Would be thrilled to work with this contractor again.
__ Would have no concerns about working with this contractor again.
__ Would not be the preferred contractor to work with again."
Comments:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .