Attachment V - PRS 20200721.doc

DOC document 33 KB Posted

Attached to
IMCOM_DPW_MATOC Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
W9124C20R0007
Issued by
Department of the Army Materiel Command Mission and Installation Contracting Command Fort Hood

About this file

This document contains a project reference sheet template and information on an upcoming federal contract opportunity for real property repair and construction services. The project reference sheet is a template for offerors to provide experience information on up to five relevant past projects, including details on work performed, schedule adherence, cost control, quality, and project management. The federal contract opportunity is a draft solicitation from the Mission and Installation Contracting Command Fort Jackson to establish a multiple award task order contract for a broad range of real property repair and construction services at Fort Jackson. The anticipated period of performance is one base year and four option years. The NAICS code is 236220 and it is set aside as a HubZone small business solicitation. A non-mandatory site visit will be held on February 11, 2020 for a sample project, with registration due by February 7. Interested parties should monitor the SAM website for solicitation details and amendments.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to IMCOM_DPW_MATOC, newest first.
File Type Posted
W9124C20R0007_0002_20200902.pdf PDF
Attachment X - Building 2100 Limited Asbestos Report 4-1-15_20200901.pdf PDF
Attachment V_PRS_20200901.pdf PDF
Attachment XI - 2100 extract from Dawson 2015 4-26-16_20200901.pdf PDF
W9124C20R0007_0001_20200901.pdf PDF
RFI_W9124C20R0007_20200901_Final.pdf PDF
Attachment IX - 2100 Asbestos Report 4-6-12_20200901.pdf PDF
20R0007_IMCOM DPW MATOC Site Visit Attendees_20200811.pdf PDF
Attachment IV - Bldg 2100 drawings specs_p63-125_20200806.pdf PDF
Attachment IV - Bldg 2100 drawings specs_p126 -186_20200806.pdf PDF
Attachment IV - Bldg 2100 drawings specs_p1-62_20200806.pdf PDF
Attachment III - SOW Sample Project Bldg 2100_21 Jul 20.docx DOCX document
Attachment I - Statement of Work_7 Apr 20 Final.doc DOC document
Attachment VII - Performance Assessment Questionnaire w-Cover Letter 20200729.pdf PDF
W9124C20R20007_FINAL.docx DOCX document
Attachment VIII_BUILDING_2100_Specifications.pdf PDF
Attachment VI - Reference Overview Sheet.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment II - Wage Determinations Residential Building Heavy 02032020.pdf PDF
Attachment VI - Reference Overview Sheet.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment II - Wage Determinations (Residential, Building and Heavy)020....pdf PDF
Attachment V - PRS.doc DOC document
Attachment VII - Performance Assessment Questionnaire.docx DOCX document
Attachment V - PRS.doc DOC document
Attachment III - SOW Sample Project Bldg. 5385 (Draft).docx DOCX document
20R0007_IMCOM DPW_ Draft Solicitation_20200204.pdf PDF
Attachment II - Wage Determinations (Residential, Building and Heavy)02032020.pdf PDF
Attachment I - Statement of Work dated 30 October 2019.pdf PDF
Attachment VI - Reference Overview Sheet.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment VII - Performance Assessment Questionnaire.docx DOCX document
Attachment IV - Bldg 3330 As-Builts.pdf PDF
Show all 30

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Project Reference Sheet (no more than five pages per project) **(To be completed by Offerors)**

1. Contract Number/Project No.:

2. Project Name & Client:

3. Location work was performed:

4. Date work was completed (must be within last 3 years):

5. Final cost of this project:

6. Clearly describe what part of the work performed by the firm for which experience information is submitted. Provide dollar magnitude for each of the following categories if multiple categories are selected:

a. Building renovations, including floors, doors, walls, windows and external facades:

b. Repair/replacement of major building systems such as electrical, mechanical and HVAC:

c. Civil work, including earthwork and drainage structures:

d. Environmental work:

7. Work was performed as a _____Prime _____Joint Venture _____Subcontractor

8. Timeline of performance

1. Was the project completed on schedule?

_____ Completed project prior to approved scheduled completion date.

_____ Completed project by original scheduled completion date.

_____ Failed to meet project completion date.

Comments:

2. Were contract delivery schedules adhered to at significant milestones?

____ Exceeded scheduled milestone requirements.

____ Delivered as scheduled but occasionally missed milestone dates.

____ Met scheduled milestone requirements.

Comments:

3. How responsive were you in addressing unforeseen/unanticipated conditions?

____ Consistently exercised a pro-active approach.

____ Demonstrated some initiative in exercising a pro-active approach.

____ Never demonstrated a pro-active approach.

Comments:

9. Cost Control –

1. Did you submit reasonably priced change proposals?

____ Contractor consistently submitted fair and reasonably priced change proposals. ____ Contractor typically submitted fair and reasonably priced change proposals. ____ Contractor submitted fair and reasonably priced proposals some of the time. ____ Contractor rarely submitted fair and reasonably priced change proposals.

Comments:

2. How well did the contractor manage cost throughout the life of the contract?

____ Contractor was extremely responsive in expediting proposal submissions.

____ Contractor was generally responsive in expediting proposal submissions ____ Contractor was sometimes responsive in timely submissions of change Proposals.

____ Contractor was nonresponsive in timely submissions of change proposals.

Comments:

10. Quality product

1. How well has the contractor complied with contract requirements?

____ Contractor exceeded contract requirements.

____ Contractor met the minimum requirements.

____ Contractor did not meet the minimum requirements.

Comments:

2. Did they conform to standards quality IT Services?

____ Contractor exceeded standards of good workmanship. ____ Contractor met the standards of good workmanship.

____ Contractor did not meet standards of good workmanship.

Comments:

Does the contractor have the ability to adapt to changing requirements while maintaining a desired level of quality?

____ Contractor was extremely effective in adapting to changing requirements. ____ Contractor was effective in adapting to changing requirements.

____ Contractor was ineffective in adapting to changing requirements.

Comments:

11. Project Management

1. Did the contractor manage project activities well, including managing internal staffing issues in a manner that delivered a quality product while minimizing the impact on the customer?

____ Contractor worked extremely well with the owner and the owner’s technical advisors) ____ Contractor was generally cooperative with the owner and the owner’s technical advisors. ____ Contractor did not work well with the owner and the owner’s technical advisors.

Comments:

2. Did the contractor work cooperatively with other vendors and Government staff to deliver a fully coordinated product?

____ Contractor was very cooperative.

____ Contractor was generally cooperative. ____ Contractor was not cooperative.

Comments:

3. Would you work with this contractor again or recommend this contractor for future projects?

__ Would be thrilled to work with this contractor again.

__ Would have no concerns about working with this contractor again.

__ Would not be the preferred contractor to work with again."

Comments:

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .