Attachment VII - Performance Assessment Questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 16 KB Posted

Attached to
IMCOM_DPW_MATOC Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
W9124C20R0007
Issued by
Department of the Army Materiel Command Mission and Installation Contracting Command Fort Hood

About this file

This document contains a draft solicitation for a multiple award task order contract to provide facility repairs, renovations, and construction services at Fort Jackson. The Mission and Installation Contracting Command Fort Jackson seeks these services for a period of one base year and four option years. Projects may include incidental design, testing, studies, surveys, and abatement work. The primary NAICS code is 236220 and it is set aside for HubZone small businesses. The contracting office will hold a mandatory site visit on February 11, 2020 for a sample project, with registration due by February 7. Interested parties should monitor the SAM website for solicitation documents and amendments.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to IMCOM_DPW_MATOC, newest first.
File Type Posted
W9124C20R0007_0002_20200902.pdf PDF
Attachment X - Building 2100 Limited Asbestos Report 4-1-15_20200901.pdf PDF
Attachment V_PRS_20200901.pdf PDF
Attachment XI - 2100 extract from Dawson 2015 4-26-16_20200901.pdf PDF
W9124C20R0007_0001_20200901.pdf PDF
RFI_W9124C20R0007_20200901_Final.pdf PDF
Attachment IX - 2100 Asbestos Report 4-6-12_20200901.pdf PDF
20R0007_IMCOM DPW MATOC Site Visit Attendees_20200811.pdf PDF
Attachment IV - Bldg 2100 drawings specs_p126 -186_20200806.pdf PDF
Attachment IV - Bldg 2100 drawings specs_p1-62_20200806.pdf PDF
Attachment IV - Bldg 2100 drawings specs_p63-125_20200806.pdf PDF
Attachment VI - Reference Overview Sheet.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
W9124C20R20007_FINAL.docx DOCX document
Attachment VII - Performance Assessment Questionnaire w-Cover Letter 20200729.pdf PDF
Attachment VIII_BUILDING_2100_Specifications.pdf PDF
Attachment V - PRS 20200721.doc DOC document
Attachment II - Wage Determinations Residential Building Heavy 02032020.pdf PDF
Attachment III - SOW Sample Project Bldg 2100_21 Jul 20.docx DOCX document
Attachment I - Statement of Work_7 Apr 20 Final.doc DOC document
Attachment II - Wage Determinations (Residential, Building and Heavy)020....pdf PDF
Attachment V - PRS.doc DOC document
Attachment VI - Reference Overview Sheet.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
20R0007_IMCOM DPW_ Draft Solicitation_20200204.pdf PDF
Attachment II - Wage Determinations (Residential, Building and Heavy)02032020.pdf PDF
Attachment III - SOW Sample Project Bldg. 5385 (Draft).docx DOCX document
Attachment I - Statement of Work dated 30 October 2019.pdf PDF
Attachment VI - Reference Overview Sheet.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment VII - Performance Assessment Questionnaire.docx DOCX document
Attachment IV - Bldg 3330 As-Builts.pdf PDF
Attachment V - PRS.doc DOC document
Show all 30

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Performance Assessment Questionnaire [Questionnaire should include questions to assess compliance with FAR 52.219-8 and FAR 52.219-9.] Please provide your candid responses. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of federal contracts. Therefore, it is important that your information be as factual, accurate and complete as possible to preclude the need for follow-up by the evaluators. If you do not have knowledge of or experience with the company in question, please forward this Questionnaire to the person who does [and/or notify the Contracting Officer]. Please return the completed Questionnaire to the Contracting Officer identified in the cover letter within the stated timeframe.

Rating Definitions:

Substantial Confidence: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with few, if any, minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. The offeror has been highly successfully in performing the required effort.

Satisfactory Confidence: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. The offeror has successfully performed the required effort.

Limited Confidence: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the contractor has either not yet identified corrective actions or the corrective actions taken appear only marginally effective. The offeror has had little success performing the required effort.

No Confidence: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the corrective actions were ineffective. The offeror has not successfully performed the required effort.

PART I. (To be completed by the Offeror)

A. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

Contractor/Company Name/Division:

Address:

Program Identification/Title:

Contract Number:

Contract Type:

Prime Contractor Name (if different from the contractor name cited above):

Contract Award Date:

Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion Date:

Nature of the Contractual Effort or Items Purchased:

Total Contract Value:

B. IDENTIFICATION OF OFFEROR’S REPRESENTATIVE

Name:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number:

Address:

E-mail Address:

PART II. EVALUATION (To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent) *Note: rationale is required for each response.

A. Cost Control: Submission of reasonably priced change proposals, and cost management throughout the life of the contract?

· Substantial Confidence

· Satisfactory Confidence

· Limited Confidence

· No Confidence

Rationale: __________________________________________________________

B. Project Management (to include use and control of subcontractors): Manage project activities, including internal staffing issues that delivered a quality product while minimizing the impact on the customer?

· Limited Confidence

· No Confidence

Rationale: __________________________________________________________

C. Timeline of Performance: Project completed on schedule, significant milestones met and responsive to unforeseen/unanticipated conditions?

· Limited Confidence

· No Confidence

Rationale: __________________________________________________________

D. Quality Product: Comply with contract requirements, and demonstrate the ability to adapt to changing requirements while maintaining a desired level of quality?

· Limited Confidence

· No Confidence

Rationale: __________________________________________________________

E. General Comments. Provide any other relevant performance information.

Comments: _________________________________________________________

F. Other Information Sources. Please provide the following information:

Are you aware of other relevant past efforts by this company?

If yes, please provide the name and telephone number of a point of contact:

Point of Contact (Name): __________________________________________ Telephone Number: ______________________________________________

G. Respondent Identification. Please provide the following information:

Organization:

Name:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number Address:

E-mail Address:

PART III. RETURN INFORMATION

Please return this completed Questionnaire to the Contracting Officer identified in the cover letter.

Thank you for your assistance.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .