Attachment_16_STO_PRS.pdf

PDF 201 KB Posted

Attached to
FBO Amendment to RFP W58RGZ-15-R-0166
Solicitation number
W58RGZ-15-R-0166
Issued by

About this file

Attachment 16 - STO PRS

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Attachment_09_Skill_Classification_Crosswalk_(11_Sep_17).xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
W58RGZ15R0166-0002.pdf PDF
Attachment_17-Industry_Questions_&_Government_Responses_-_Part_II.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_15_STO_PWS_.pdf PDF
Attachment_04_Past_Performance_Risk_Reference_Sheet-8Sep17.pdf PDF
W58RGZ15R0166-0001.pdf PDF
Attachment_0017-Industry_Questions_&_Government_Responses_-_Part_I.pdf PDF
Attachment_14_TORP_Letter.pdf PDF
Attachment_06_Type_of_Service_or_Supply.pdf PDF
Draft_RFP_25July2017-Industry_Questions_&_Answers.pdf PDF
Attachment_06_Type_of_Service_or_Supply.pdf PDF
Exhibit_C_STO_CDRLS.pdf PDF
Attachment_07_OCI_Analysis_Disclosure_Form.pdf PDF
Attachment_10__FFP_Labor_Rate_Table.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
W58RGZ15R0166.pdf PDF
Attachment_02_Pre-Award_Survey_of_Prospective_Contractor_Accounting_System_Checklist.pdf PDF
Attachment_01__Performance_Requirements_Summary_Matrix.pdf PDF
Attachment_15_STO_PWS.pdf PDF
Attachment_14_TORP_Letter_STO.pdf PDF
Attachment_09_Skill_Classification_Crosswalk_(14_Aug_17).xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Exhibit_B_O&A_Worksheet.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_04_Past_Performance_Risk_Reference_Sheet.pdf PDF
Attachment_05_Utilization_of_Small_Business_and_Small_Disadvantage_Business.pdf PDF
Attachment_13__Additional_Contract_Requirements.pdf PDF
Attachment_12_Cage_Code_and_Cognizant_DCMA_DCAA_Information.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_03_Past_Performance_Risk_Assessement_Questionnaire.pdf PDF
Exhibit_A_MA__IDIQ_CDRL.pdf PDF
Question_Form.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
DRAFT_W58RGZ-15-R-0166_25July2017.pdf PDF
Question_Form.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
DRAFT_W58RGZ-15-R-0166_25July2017.pdf PDF
Industry_Day_Questions_21July2017.pdf PDF
WLSS-C_DRFP__2_Questions_&_Answers.pdf PDF
WLSS-C_Pre_Industry_Day_QA.pdf PDF
Final_-_NSRWA_CLS_Industry_Day_Brief_14_Sep_16_v9.pdf PDF
WLSS-C_Post_Industry_Day_QA_27_Oct_16.pdf PDF
WLSS-C_Industry_Day_14_Sept_2016_Attendees.pdf PDF
Amendment_0002_DRAFT_W58RGZ-15-R-0166.pdf PDF
Attachment_4_Past_Performance_Risk_Reference_Sheet_6_Jan_2016.doc DOC document
Attachment_9_Cost_and_Price_Checklist_10_Dec_2015.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Amendment_0001_DRAFT_W58RGZ-15-R-0166.pdf PDF
Attachment_6_Type_of_Service_or_Supply_6_Jan_2016.docx DOCX document
Attachment_2_WLSS-C_DSL_12JAN2016.docx DOCX document
Attachment_5_Small_Businesses_and_Small_Disadvantaged_Businesses_Participation_6_Jan_2016.docx DOCX document
Question_Form.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Labor_Matrix.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_3_PP_Questionaire_6_Jan_2016.docx DOCX document
Attachment_7_OCIAnalysis-DisclosureForm_6_Jan_2016.doc DOC document
Attachment_1_WLSS-C_PWS_Approved_FINAL_11DEC2015.docx DOCX document
Question_Form.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Show 40 more

Latest 50 of 65 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

W58RGZ-15-R-0166

Attachment 16

PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY MATRIX

PERFORMANCE

OBJECTIVE

PERFORMANCE

STANDARD

ACCEPTABLE QUALITY

LEVEL (AQL)

METHOD OF

SURVEILLANCE

RATING

The contractor adheres to delivery schedules as specified in the Task Order (TO)

The Contractor, in performance of an active (awarded) TO, adheres and achieves all specified delivery schedules

Contractor must meet the Satisfactory Performance Rating

100% Inspection EXCEPTIONAL Achieves the specified delivery schedules 95% of the time.

VERY GOOD

Achieves the specified delivery schedules 90% of time.

SATISFACTORY

Achieves the specified delivery schedules 85% of time.

MARGINAL

Achieves the specified delivery schedules 70% of time.

UNSATISFACTORY

Achieves the specified delivery schedules less than 70% of time.

OBJECTIVE

PERFORMANCE

STANDARD

ACCEPTABLE QUALITY

LEVEL (AQL)

METHOD OF

SURVEILLANCE

Provide Contractor Logistics Support (CLS) to the AAF and SMW fleet

Provides CLS to meet Mission Availability (AM) for the fleet with the OPTEMPO defined in Attachment 15 STO PWS, paragraph 4.2.1.1

Achieve aircraft Mission Availability (AM) rate defined in Attachment 15 STO PWS, paragraph 4.2.1.2

Review of CDRL A-021 Daily Status Report and direct observation

EXCEPTIONAL

Exceeds aircraft Mission Availability rate by 10%.

VERY GOOD

Exceeds aircraft Mission Availability rate by 5%.

SATISFACTORY

Achieves aircraft Mission Availability rate.

MARGINAL

Aircraft Mission Availability rate was not attained (AM minus 5%).

UNSATISFACTORY

Aircraft Mission Availability rate was not attained (AM minus 10%).

OBJECTIVE

PERFORMANCE

STANDARD

ACCEPTABLE QUALITY

LEVEL (AQL)

METHOD OF

SURVEILLANCE

Provide Contractor Logistics Support (CLS) to the AAF and SMW fleet

Provides CLS to meet Operational Availability (AO) for the fleet with the OPTEMPO defined in Attachment 15 STO PWS, paragraph 4.2.1.1

Achieve aircraft Operational Availability (AO) rate defined in Attachment 15 STO PWS, paragraph 4.2.1.2

Review of CDRL A-021 Daily Status Report and direct observation

EXCEPTIONAL

Exceeds aircraft Operational Availability rate by 10%.

VERY GOOD

Exceeds aircraft Operational Availability rate by 5%.

SATISFACTORY

Achieves aircraft Operational Availability rate.

MARGINAL

Aircraft Operational Availability rate was not attained (AO minus 5%).

UNSATISFACTORY

Aircraft Operational Availability rate was not attained (AO minus 10%).

OBJECTIVE

PERFORMANCE

STANDARD

ACCEPTABLE QUALITY

LEVEL (AQL)

METHOD OF

SURVEILLANCE

will provide timely responses to Requests for Information (RFI)

The Contractors will submit timely responses to RFIs within the time specified in the Contracting Officer’s Letter

Contractor must meet the Satisfactory Performance Rating

100% Inspection SATISFACTORY 90% or more of responses to RFIs were received on time.

UNSATISFACTORY

Less than 90% of RFIs were received on time.

OBJECTIVE

PERFORMANCE

STANDARD

ACCEPTABLE QUALITY

LEVEL (AQL)

METHOD OF

SURVEILLANCE

actively resolves problems in the performance of their Task Order (TO) without Government involvement

The Contractor will resolve all problems occurring in the performance of their TO without Government involvement throughout the TO period of performance

Satisfactory Performance Rating

Direct observation and customer complaints

EXCEPTIONAL

Problems are resolved by the Contractor without Government involvement 90% of time.

VERY GOOD

Problems are resolved by the Contractor without Government involvement 80% of time.

SATISFACTORY

Problems are resolved by the Contractor without Government involvement 70% of time.

MARGINAL

Problems are resolved by the Contractor without Government involvement 60% of time.

UNSATISFACTORY

Problems are resolved by the Contractor without Government involvement less than 60% of time.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .