Attachment_03_Past_Performance_Risk_Assessement_Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 348 KB Posted
- Attached to
- FBO Amendment to RFP W58RGZ-15-R-0166
- Solicitation number
- W58RGZ-15-R-0166
About this file
Attachment 3 - Past Performance Risk Assessment Questionnaire
View the file
Other files
Show 40 more
Latest 50 of 65 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE RISK ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRE
PART I – CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION (To be completed by the offeror)
Contract Number: Order: (If applicable)
Contract Award Date: Forecasted or Actual Completion Date:
Contractor/Company Name & Division: Contractor Address:
Prime Contractor (If different from the contractor name cited above):
Prime Contractor POC:
Name:
Telephone No:
E-mail:
Contracting Organization & Address:
Telephone No:
E-mail:
Contracting Officer:
Telephone No:
E-mail:
Contract Administrator:
Telephone No:
E-mail:
Customer Name and Address
Telephone No:
E-mail:
Customer POC:
Telephone No:
E-mail:
Program Identification / Title:
Briefly describe the nature of the contractual effort:
What was the period of performance of this contract? Please include the $ value for each period.
Period of Performance Period 1 date:
Period 2 date:
Period 3 date:
Period 4 date:
Period 5 date:
Obligated Value
Ceiling
Acquisition Method: Competitive Yes No
Contract Type: FFP ; T&M ; LH ;
Cost type ; Other FP type
Identification Of Offeror’s Representative:
Name:
Title:
Telephone No:
Date:
W58RGZ-15-R-0166 Attachment 0003 Please provide your candid response to the following questions. The information provided will be used in the potential award of a federal contract. Therefore, it is important that your information be as factual and accurate as possible to preclude the need for follow-up by the evaluators. If you do not have the appropriate knowledge of, or experience with the company in question, please forward this questionnaire to the person who does. If you need more space, attach additional page(s). Please return the completed questionnaire to the Contracting Officer within three days. If any response herein is negative, please indicate whether the contractor was previously informed as such and provide a copy of his response, if applicable. .Thank-you.
Attachment 0003 Page 2 of 4
PART II – EVALUATION (To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent)
Provide responses to the questions below using the following adjectival ratings:
Unacceptable Performance does not meet most contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the corrective actions were ineffective.
Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements.
Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the contractor has either not yet identified corrective actions or the corrective actions taken appear only marginally effective.
Acceptable Performance meets contractual requirements. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.
Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Outstanding Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements that benefit the end user.
Work was accomplished with few, if any, minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
A. Compliance of Products, Services, Documents, and Related Deliverables to Specification Requirements and Standards of Good Workmanship
Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Good Acceptable Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
Comments:
B. Effectiveness of Project Management.
Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Good Acceptable Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
Comments:
Subcontractor Control.
Did the contractor use subcontractor(s) in the performance of any portion of this contract?
No Yes If yes, complete the following:
1. What did the subcontractor(s) do?
2. How well did the prime manage the subcontractor(s)?
3. Was the contractor timely in awarding subcontracts? Indicate timeliness of subcontract awards and management of subcontracts.
4. Did any problem occur with the subcontractor(s)?
5. If a large business, did the contractor meet or exceed the goals contained in an approved subcontracting plan during the course of the contract performance? No Yes
Attachment 0003 Page 3 of 4
C. Timeliness of Performance for Services and Product Deliverables.
Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Good Acceptable Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
Comments:
D. Effectiveness in Forecasting and Controlling Estimated Costs (Use this Question on Cost Reimbursement Type Contracts Only).
Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Good Acceptable Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
Comments:
E. Commitment to Customer Satisfaction and Business-like Concern for its Customers’ Interest Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Good Acceptable Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
Comments:
F. General Comments. Provide any other relevant performance information.
G. Other Information Sources. Please provide the following information:
No Yes Are you aware of other relevant past efforts by this company?
If yes, please provide the point of contact information:
Name:
Telephone No:
E-mail:
Attachment 0003 Page 4 of 4
Please return this completed Questionnaire via e-mail to the Contracting Officer identified in the solicitation.
Thank you for your assistance.
| Contract Number: |
| Order If applicable: |
| Contract Award Date: |
| ContractorCompany Name Division: |
| Contractor Address: |
| Prime Contractor If different from the contractor name cited above: |
| Prime Contractor POC Name Telephone No Email: |
| Contracting Officer Telephone No Email Contract Administrator Telephone No Email: |
| Customer Name and Address Telephone No Email: |
| Customer POC Telephone No Email: |
| Program Identification Title: |
| Briefly describe the nature of the contractual effort: |
| What was the period of performance of this contract Please include the value for each period: |
| Obligated Value: |
| Yes: |
| Contract Type FFP: Off |
| TM: Off |
| LH: Off |
| No: |
| Cost type: Off |
| Other FP type: Off |
| Date: |
| Provide responses to the questions below using the following adjectival ratings: |
| A Compliance of Products Services Documents and Related Deliverables to Specification Requirements and Standards of Good Workmanship Outstanding Explanation must be provided in Comments field below Good Acceptable Marginal Explanation must be provided in Comments field below Unsatisfactory Explanation must be provided in Comments field below Comments: |
| Outstanding Explanation must be provided in Comments field below: Off |
| Good: Off |
| Acceptable: Off |
| Marginal Explanation must be provided in Comments field below: Off |
| Unsatisfactory Explanation must be provided in Comments field below: Off |
| Outstanding Explanation must be provided in Comments field below: Off |
| Good_2: Off |
| Acceptable_2: Off |
| Marginal Explanation must be provided in Comments field below_2: Off |
| Unsatisfactory Explanation must be provided in Comments field below_2: Off |
| Did the contractor use subcontractors in the performance of any portion of this contract: Off |
| 5 If a large business did the contractor meet or exceed the goals contained in an approved subcontracting plan during: Off |
| C Timeliness of Performance for Services and Product Deliverables Outstanding Explanation must be provided in Comments field below Good Acceptable Marginal Explanation must be provided in Comments field below Unsatisfactory Explanation must be provided in Comments field below Comments: |
| Outstanding Explanation must be provided in Comments field below_2: Off |
| Good_3: Off |
| Acceptable_3: Off |
| Marginal Explanation must be provided in Comments field below_3: Off |
| Unsatisfactory Explanation must be provided in Comments field below_3: Off |
| D Effectiveness in Forecasting and Controlling Estimated Costs Use this Question on Cost Reimbursement Type Contracts Only Outstanding Explanation must be provided in Comments field below Good Acceptable Marginal Explanation must be provided in Comments field below Unsatisfactory Explanation must be provided in Comments field below Comments: |
| Outstanding Explanation must be provided in Comments field below_3: Off |
| Good_4: Off |
| Acceptable_4: Off |
| Marginal Explanation must be provided in Comments field below_4: Off |
| Unsatisfactory Explanation must be provided in Comments field below_4: Off |
| E Commitment to Customer Satisfaction and Businesslike Concern for its Customers Interest Outstanding Explanation must be provided in Comments field below Good Acceptable Marginal Explanation must be provided in Comments field below Unsatisfactory Explanation must be provided in Comments field below Comments: |
| Outstanding Explanation must be provided in Comments field below_4: Off |
| Good_5: Off |
| Acceptable_5: Off |
| Marginal Explanation must be provided in Comments field below_5: Off |
| Unsatisfactory Explanation must be provided in Comments field below_5: Off |
| F General Comments Provide any other relevant performance information: |
| No_4: Off |
| Yes Are you aware of other relevant past efforts by this company: Off |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .