W56HZV21R0011-0003.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. Contract ID Code Page Of

2. Amendment/Modification No.

3. Effective Date

4. Requisition/Purchase Req No.

5. Project No. (If applicable)

6. Issued By Code 7. Administered By (If other than Item 6) Code

8. Name And Address Of Contractor (No., Street, City, County, State and Zip Code)

9A. Amendment Of Solicitation No.

9B. Dated (See Item 11)

10A. Modification Of Contract/Order No.

10B. Dated (See Item 13) Code Facility Code

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended, is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning ____________ copies of the amendments: (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted; or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. Accounting And Appropriation Data (If required)

13. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS

It Modifies The Contract/Order No. As Described In Item 14.

A. This Change Order is Issued Pursuant To: The Changes Set Forth In Item 14 Are Made In

The Contract/Order No. In Item 10A.

B. The Above Numbered Contract/Order Is Modified To Reflect The Administrative Changes (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) Set

Forth In Item 14, Pursuant To The Authority of FAR 43.103(b).

C. This Supplemental Agreement Is Entered Into Pursuant To Authority Of:

D. Other (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return _______________ copies to the Issuing Office.

14. Description Of Amendment/Modification (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. Name And Title Of Signer (Type or print)

16A. Name And Title Of Contracting Officer (Type or print)

15B. Contractor/Offeror 15C. Date Signed 16B. United States Of America 16C. Date Signed

By (Signature of person authorized to sign) (Signature of Contracting Officer)

NSN 7540-01-152-8070

PREVIOUS EDITIONS UNUSABLE

30-105-02 STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

SEE SCHEDULE

X

Firm Fixed Price

W56HZV

ACC-DTA

6501 E. 11 MILE RD.

DETROIT ARSENAL, MI 48397-5000

JON KAERCHER

EMAIL: JON.F.KAERCHER.CIV@MAIL.MIL

W56HZV-21-R-0011

2021MAY12

X

X

2 signed

SEE SECOND PAGE FOR DESCRIPTION

1 5

CONTINUATION SHEET

Reference No. of Document Being Continued Page of

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

SECTION A - SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

Buyer Name: JON KAERCHER

Buyer Office Symbol/Telephone Number: CCTA-HCP-D/(586)282-0328

Type of Contract 1: Firm Fixed Price

Kind of Contract: System Acquisition Contracts

*** End of Narrative A0000 ***

1. Amendment 0003 to solicitation W56HZV-21-R-0011 incorporates Sections M.1.2 and M.3.6 which includes additional requirements for award eligibility.

2. As a result of Amendment 0003, the following requirements are hereby incorporated:

M.1.2 Eligibility for Award. Award will only be made to an offeror who is eligible for award. To be eligible for award:

a. The offeror must be determined responsible (See Section M.3.6);

b. The proposal must not contain a Deficiency(s) (per FAR Part 15.001);

c. The offeror must be registered in the System for Award Management (SAM) - see provision 52.204-7, and must be a self-certified U.S.

small business concern for North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code identified in this solicitation; and

d. The proposal must be affordable (see Section M.4.2.1.4).

M.3.6 Determination of Responsibility. Per FAR Part 9.103, a contract will be placed only with the offeror that the Contracting Officer determines to be responsible. Prospective offeror(s), in order to be eligible for award for this acquisition, must be able to demonstrate that they meet standards of responsibility set forth in FAR Part 9.104, or refer the matter to the SBA per FAR 19.602. In addition, the Government may assess the offeror's financial and management capabilities to meet the solicitation requirements. The

Government reserves the right to conduct a Pre-Award Survey on any or all offeror(s) or their subcontractors to aid the Contracting

Officer in the evaluation of each offeror's proposal and ensure that a selected offeror is responsible. No award can be made to an offeror who has been determined to be not responsible by the Contracting Officer. To make sure that you meet the responsibility criteria at FAR Part 9.104, the Government may:

a. Arrange a visit to your facility and perform a necessary Pre-Award Survey. The offeror's refusal to authorize the Government to visit the offerors facility may result in a determination that the offeror is not responsible.

and/or

b. Request an offeror provide financial, technical, production, or managerial background information. If the requested information is not submitted within seven calendar days from the date of the receipt of the request, or if an offeror refuses the Government access to its facility, the Government may determine the offeror non-responsible. If the Government visits the offeror's facility, please ensure that current data relevant to the proposal is available for Government personnel to review.

3. Except as provided herein, all other items remain unchanged.

*** END OF NARRATIVE A0004 ***

2 5

W56HZV-21-R-0011

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

SECTION M - EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

M.1 Basis of Award

M.1.1 The solicitation is 100% set-aside to U.S. small businesses concerns for North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 221310. The Government intends to award up to five Firm-Fixed Price Five-Year IDIQ contracts, with two optional 1-year Ordering

Periods, as a result of this solicitation. An award will be made to the offerors whose proposal represents the best value to the

Government in accordance with the criteria set forth below, and is eligible for award.

M.1.1.1 There are two evaluation factors:

a. Experience Factor

b. Price Factor

The relative order of importance of these Factors are described in Section M.4 below.

M.1.1.2 Proposal selection will be made utilizing the source selection trade-off process, considering the evaluation Factors and their relative order of importance (see Section M.4), to identify the proposal which represents the best value and is most advantageous to the

Government. The Government will weigh the evaluation factors (other than the Price Factor) against the total evaluated price to the

Government. As part of the best value determination, the relative strengths, weaknesses, and risks of each proposal shall be considered in selecting the offer that is most advantageous and represents the best overall value to the Government. The Government reserves the right to choose not to award a contract if such action is in the Governments best interest.

M.1.1.3 In making the award decision, the Government will review proposals to determine if any other price adjustments (beyond the GFP

Price adjustment and transportation costs that are already included in the total evaluated price) are required IAW the FAR, DFARS, or clauses or provisions contained within this solicitation. If an additional price adjustment is determined to be applicable, then the

Government will develop a final price for those offerors impacted by the adjustment(s) and base the final award decision on this final price. IAW FAR 52.219-4(b)(2), if the HUBZone price adjustment is applicable, then all other price adjustments described in the solicitation shall be applied before the application of the HUBZone price adjustment.

M.1.1.4 Importance of Price. Award will be made to the offeror whose proposal represents the best value to the Government and is otherwise eligible for award. This may not be the offeror with the lowest evaluated price. However, the closer offeror's evaluations are to each other in those Factors other than the Price Factor, the more important cost/price becomes in the decision.

Notwithstanding the relative order of importance of the two evaluation Factors stated herein, price may be controlling when:

a. Proposals are otherwise considered approximately equal in non-price factors; or

b. An otherwise superior proposal is unaffordable; or

c. The advantages of a higher rated, higher priced proposal are not considered to be worth the price premium.

M.1.2 Eligibility for Award. Award will only be made to an offeror who is eligible for award. To be eligible for award:

a. The offeror must be determined responsible (See Section M.3.6);

b. The proposal must not contain a Deficiency(s) (per FAR Part 15.001);

c. The offeror must be registered in the System for Award Management (SAM) - see provision 52.204-7, and must be a self-certified U.S.

small business concern for North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code identified in this solicitation; and

d. The proposal must be affordable (see Section M.4.2.1.4).

M.2 Rejection of Offers

M.2.1 The Government may reject any proposal if in the Government's best interest at any time after receipt of proposal. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following proposal conditions:

a. The proposal fails to meaningfully respond to the instructions in Section L of this solicitation (e.g. a proposal provides some data but omits significant material data and information required by Section L, the offeror fails to submit Pricing Attachment 0040 in accordance with the instructions, the proposal fails to follow key proposal instructions or format requirements in Section L, etc).

b. A proposal merely offers to perform work according to the solicitation terms or fails to present more than a statement indicating its capability to comply with the solicitation terms and does not provide support and elaboration as specified in Section L of this solicitation.

c. The proposal proposes exceptions to the RFP requirements, attachments, exhibits, enclosures, or solicitation terms and conditions.

d. The proposal contains one or more Organizational Conflicts of Interest (OCIs) that cannot be avoided or mitigated. Refer to

Section L paragraph L.4.3.7 of this solicitation, "Organizational Conflict of Interest."

e. The proposal is unbalanced as to price. See Section M.4.2.1.5.

f. The proposal submitted is for less than all the requirements called for by the solicitation.

g. The proposals acceptance period does not meet the Governments required minimum acceptance period (Refer to Section L.1.2).

h. The offerors proposed price for the sum of CLIN 0001, WSDS Pump Reliability and Mobility-Phase I and CLIN 0002, Pump Reliability

3 5

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

and Mobility FSR Support-Phase I exceeds $200,000.

M.3 Source Selection Process

M.3.1 Compliance Review. After receipt of proposals, but prior to the evaluation process, the Government will perform a compliance review of the offerors proposal to determine the extent of compliance to the solicitation instructions, and whether the proposal meets any of the conditions listed in M.2, Rejection of Offerors.

M.3.2 Evaluation Process. Selection of the successful offeror will be made following an assessment of each proposal not otherwise rejected, based on the response to the information called for in Section L of this RFP, and against the solicitation requirements and the evaluation criteria described herein. Proposals not otherwise rejected will be evaluated as specified herein, to include developing narrative support for the evaluation conclusions under each Factor.

M.3.3 Source Selection Authority. The Source Selection Authority (SSA) is the official designated to direct the source selection process and select the offeror for contract award.

M.3.4 Source Selection Evaluation Board (SSEB). An SSEB has been established by the Government to evaluate proposals in response to this solicitation. The SSEB is comprised of technically qualified individuals who have been selected to conduct this evaluation in accordance with the evaluation criteria for this solicitation. All proposals not otherwise rejected will be given careful, full and impartial consideration by a team of Government personnel in the evaluation, pursuant to the criteria in this solicitation.

M.3.5 Award without Discussions. This RFP includes FAR Provision 52.215-1 Instructions to Offerors Competitive Acquisition in Section L which advises offerors that the Government intends to make award without conducting discussions. Where awards will be made without discussions, exchanges with offerors are limited to Clarifications as defined in FAR 15.306(a). Therefore, the offerors initial proposal should contain the offerors best terms from a Price and non-Price Factor standpoint. However, under FAR 52.215-1(f)(4), the Government reserves the right to hold discussions, if necessary. If the Contracting Officer determines that the number of proposals that would otherwise be in the competitive range exceeds the number at which an efficient competition can be conducted, the Contracting Officer may limit the number of proposals in the competitive range to the greatest number that will permit an efficient competition among the most highly rated proposals.

M.3.6 Determination of Responsibility. Per FAR Part 9.103, a contract will be placed only with the offeror that the Contracting Officer determines to be responsible. Prospective offeror(s), in order to be eligible for award for this acquisition, must be able to demonstrate that they meet standards of responsibility set forth in FAR Part 9.104, or refer the matter to the SBA per FAR 19.602. In addition, the Government may assess the offeror's financial and management capabilities to meet the solicitation requirements. The

Government reserves the right to conduct a Pre-Award Survey on any or all offeror(s) or their subcontractors to aid the Contracting

Officer in the evaluation of each offeror's proposal and ensure that a selected offeror is responsible. No award can be made to an offeror who has been determined to be not responsible by the Contracting Officer. To make sure that you meet the responsibility criteria at FAR Part 9.104, the Government may:

a. Arrange a visit to your facility and perform a necessary Pre-Award Survey. The offeror's refusal to authorize the Government to visit the offerors facility may result in a determination that the offeror is not responsible.

and/or

b. Request an offeror provide financial, technical, production, or managerial background information. If the requested information is not submitted within seven calendar days from the date of the receipt of the request, or if an offeror refuses the Government access to its facility, the Government may determine the offeror non-responsible. If the Government visits the offeror's facility, please ensure that current data relevant to the proposal is available for Government personnel to review

M.3.7 Consistency. Each volume of the offerors proposal shall be consistent with the other proposal volumes and shall demonstrate the understanding and ability to perform according to the statement of work of the contract. The offeror should provide supporting documentation in sufficient detail to permit a complete evaluation of the proposal. The Government may conduct a crosswalk between the information provided in offerors proposal volumes to assess whether the offeror submits consistent proposal information.

M.4 Evaluation Criteria

There are two evaluation factors:

a. Experience Factor

b. Price Factor

The relative order of importance of these factors is as follows: The Experience Factor is more important than the Price Factor. The non-price factors, when combined, are more important than the Price Factor.

M.4.1 Volume 1 Experience Factor

4 5

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

M.4.1.1 The Experience Factor will assess the offerors approach and understanding of requirements, and risk associated with the offer successfully performing the required effort, based on the extent to which the offerors proposed recent experience is comparable to the statement of work activities listed in L.4.1.2. The Government will only consider recent experience in the evaluation, as defined in

Section L.4.1.1, and in the Section L.4.1 definition of a Contract.

M.4.1.2 When assessing the risk associated with recent comparable experience listed in L.4.1.2, more comparable substantiated experience will be assessed as lower risk, which may be assessed as a strength(s), while less comparable substantiated experience may be assessed as higher risk, which may be assessed as a weakness(s) or significant weakness(s). Recent experience that is not comparable or not substantiated with the information requested in Section L.4.1.2 may be assessed with increased risk to the Government, which may be assessed as a weakness(s) or significant weakness(s). Offers that do not propose any experience will not be assessed with a deficiency in the evaluation, but may be assessed with one or more significant weaknesses(s).

M.4.1.3 The offeror may also be evaluated on experience information based on internal Government or private source information and reserves the right to use any information received as part of its evaluation. The Government may contact any of the references the offeror provides, and reserves the right to use any information received as part of its evaluation.

M.4.1.4 Experience which is identified in the offerors Experience Factor volume but is not supported with the information requested in

Section L may result in the proposed experience being discounted in the evaluation, which may result in being assessed with higher risk.

In addition, if any other proposal volume indicates the Government will not realize the benefit of the cited experience during contract performance, may result in the proposed experience being discounted in the evaluation, which may result in being assessed with higher risk.

M.4.2 Price Factor (Factor 2)

M.4.2.1 The Price Factor evaluation will consider the Total Evaluated Price to the Government. The Government will also evaluate the offerors price proposal for price reasonableness, unbalanced pricing and affordability.

M.4.2.1.1 Total Evaluated Price:

The Total Evaluated Price equals the sum of the following:

(a) The proposed prices for all CLINs, as calculated in Attachment 0040 - Pricing Workbook; and

(b) If applicable, any other price adjustments, for evaluation purposes only, that are required in accordance with the (i) FAR; (ii)

DFARS; or (iii) RFP (to include RFP Attachments).

M.4.2.1.2 Price Reasonableness:

The Government will evaluate whether or not the offerors proposed price is reasonable. A price is reasonable if, in its nature and amount, it does not exceed that which would be incurred by a prudent person in the conduct of competitive business. The Government may make a determination of reasonableness by any means allowable under FAR 15.404-1.

M.4.2.1.3 Unbalanced Pricing:

The Government will evaluate the Offerors proposal for unbalanced pricing. Unbalanced pricing exists when, despite an acceptable total evaluated price, the price of one or more contract line items is significantly over- or understated as indicated by the application of cost and price analysis techniques. Offerors are cautioned that a proposal the Government assesses to be unbalanced as to price, may either be rejected or determined unacceptable for award. See FAR 15.404-1(g) for more information on unbalanced pricing.

M.4.2.1.4 Affordability. The total target price for CLINs 0001 and 0002 is $200,000.00. CLIN 0001(WSDS Pump Reliability and Mobility

Test PQT Phase I) and 0002 (WSDS Pump Reliability and Mobility FSR APG Phase I) represent the contract minimum quantity order. Offerors can propose an amount greater than $200,000.00, but may be deemed unaffordable.

*** END OF NARRATIVE M0001 ***

5 5