Attachment_0002__PAST_PERFORMANCE_QUESTIONNAIRE.docx
DOCX document 51 KB Posted
- Attached to
- 60mm, 81mm, 120mm Mortar Propelling Charges
- Solicitation number
- W52P1J-16-R-0134
About this file
Attachment 0002 PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
View the file
Other files
Show all 36
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment 0002
SECTION L - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS, AND NOTICES TO OFFERORS
L.4.3 Volume III – FACTOR 3: PAST PERFORMANCE (no page limit)
L.4.3.1 Volume III shall be submitted in accordance with the following format:
Cover Page Solicitation Number, Offeror Name, CAGE, and DUNS - one page
Section 1 Contract References - Three total references maximum using Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) Form Sections IIA and IIB completed only.
Section 2 Relevant Delivery and Quality Performance Narratives - Limited to two pages maximum for each reference
Section 3 Adverse Contract Performance - No page limitations
L.4.3.2 Contract References:
The Offeror shall submit no more than three contract references with its initial proposal representing recent and relevant performance under U.S. Army, United States Marine Corp and FMS or other Military contracts. It is recommended that Offerors limit references to those involving its performance as a prime contractor only.
L.4.3.2.1 Recent project/contracts are defined as prime contracts, task orders, delivery orders, or subcontracts where services or deliverables were performed or still being performed anytime within three (3) years of issuance of this RFP. Work performed on multiple orders under the same contract may be submitted as a single contract reference as long as all of the work supports the same program/solution. The Government reserves the right to consider any significant past performance after the solicitation closing date and prior to award.
L.4.3.2.2 Relevant means performance that demonstrates the work efforts performed by the Offeror or its proposed subcontractors involved the same or similar manufacturing processes and quality assurance processes needed to produce and deliver 60mm, 81mm, and 120mm propelling charges in accordance with the TDP and solicitation requirements.
L.4.3.3 Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ)
The contract information to be provided with each contract reference is on the PPQ, Attachment 0002. The Offeror must complete PPQ Sections IIA and IIB for each contract reference and send copies of the PPQ to the respondent(s) Point of Contact (POC) as identified in IIA in a timely manner. The Offeror shall include these documents in Volume 3, Section 2 of the proposal. The PPQ respondent(s) will send the completed questionnaire directly to the U.S. Government POC as shown in Section IV of the PPQ.
To ensure inclusion of all references in the evaluation process, the Offeror is encouraged to provide the U.S. Government with the most current contract data and POC information on each reference on the PPQ.
The U.S. Government is not required to interview any POCs identified by Offerors. The U.S. Government reserves the right to use data provided in the Offerors proposal and data obtained from other sources.
L.4.3.4 Relevant Delivery and Quality Performance Narratives:
The Offeror shall provide a descriptive narrative of each submitted contract reference that describes the contracted work effort detailing how the requirements are relevant to the requirements of this solicitation. Product Part Numbers and applicable National Stock Numbers (NSNs) shall be listed. The narrative shall include the average monthly and yearly contracted delivery quantities.
L.4.3.5 Adverse Contract Performance:
In addition to the contract references, the Offeror shall identify every recent and relevant contract it was awarded that encountered any performance problems. For any contract meeting this description, provide the following information:
a) Contract number and Order number, if applicable
b) NSN
c) Part Number
d) POC/Contracting Officer to include email addresses and telephone number
e) Provide a copy of any Corrective Action Report (CAR) or Product Quality Deficiency Report (PQDR)
f) State any corrective actions taken to avoid reoccurrence
g) Describe the extent to which the corrective action has been successful, Identifying POC who can confirm the success of the corrective measures
h) The Offeror shall identify any violations related to Occupational Safety & Health Administration (OSHA) and Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
i) Federal Legal Settlements or Fines. The Offeror shall identify any DoD, Federal, or state settlements resulting from a legal action or legal decision (example OSHA, EPA, state, other)
j) Cage code /DUNS
k) Contracting Officer’s Representative name and telephone number, if applicable
l) Contract type (i.e. FFP, CPFF etc.)
m) Award Price
n) Final or projected final price
The Offeror shall also identify every recent and relevant contract that was terminated for default or cause, in whole or in part, within the past three years of issuance of this solicitation. For any contract falling under these descriptions, provide the following information:
a) Contract number and Order number
b) Date of Termination or Partial Termination
c) POC/Contracting Officer to include email addresses and telephone number
d) Identify reason for any terminations for default or cause
The number of contracts and page counts provided in response to L.4.3.5 is unlimited. If there are no contracts meeting the descriptions of L.4.3.5 the Offeror must state as such. Failure to include this information or a statement may be a cause for rejection of an Offeror’s proposal as incomplete.
L. 4.3.6. The Government reserves the right to use data provided in the Offeror's proposal and data obtained from other sources such as the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS). To ensure inclusion of all references in the evaluation process, the Offeror is encouraged to provide the Government with the most current data on each reference.
L.4.3.7. References provided on classified contracts or contracts to foreign entities cannot be verified; therefore, classified and foreign contracts will not be evaluated.
SECTION M – EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD
M.4 EVALUATION PROCESS
M.4.1 Past performance information is evaluated as a predictor of future contract performance. The U.S. Government will assess the degree of confidence it has that the Offeror will successfully complete the requirements in accordance with the contract terms based on the Offeror's demonstrated record of recent and relevant performance.
M.4.2 Recent contracts: See L.4.3.2.1
M.4.3 Relevancy Ratings: See L.4.3.2.2
M.4.4 in conducting the past performance evaluation, the Government may use information obtained from other sources, or may use information with regard to other projects/contracts performed by the Offeror which it has knowledge, whether or not those projects/contracts are disclosed to the Government by the Offeror.
M.4.5 In evaluating performance history, the Government may review the Offeror’s current and prior performance record of complying with all aspects of its contractual agreement: quality of performance, products and services; timeliness of performance; operations management; subcontractor management; problem resolution and, if applicable; cost control.
M.4.6 The U.S. Government may consider the recency, degree of relevance, source, and context of the past performance information it evaluates as well as quality, general trends in performance, and demonstrated corrective actions. A significant achievement, problem, problem resolution, or lack of relevant data in any element can become an important consideration in the assessment process. A negative finding in any element may have an impact on the assessment and the Overall Past Performance Confidence Assessment rating.
M.4.7 The relevancy of the past performance information will be determined as follows:
· Relevant: Present/past performance effort involved essentially the same, similar or some of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.
· Not Relevant: Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.
M.4.8. Offeror’s Past Performance will be rated as follows:
· Acceptable: Based on the Offeror's recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
· Unacceptable: Based on the Offerors recent/relevant performance record; the Government has no expectation that the Offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.
Absent any recent and relevant past performance history, the offeror will be determined to have unknown past performance and the Offeror’s proposal will not be evaluated either favorably or unfavorably on past performance. In the context of acceptability/ unacceptability, “unknown” shall be considered “acceptable.”
The Government is not required to interview all points of contact identified by the Offeror. It is the responsibility of the Offeror to provide complete past performance information and thorough explanations as required by Section L. The Government is not obliged to make another request for the required information.
(SOLICITATION PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE)
Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) Form The Offeror must complete Sections IIA and IIB for each Past Performance reference and send copies to the PPQ respondent(s) identified in IIA in a timely manner. The Offeror shall include these documents with its proposal; however, the PPQ respondent will send the completed questionnaire directly to the POC identified in the PPQ Section IV below.
In order to assess potential contractors ACC-RI contracting office is obtaining past performance information with respect to each Offeror. The PPQ respondent will complete all sections of the Past Performance Evaluation Questionnaire except sections IIA and IIB. In addition to this questionnaire, you may receive a follow-up phone call or email to confirm or clarify information. This is a critical acquisition being conducted by ACC-RI and your support is sincerely appreciated.
Thank you for your time, effort, and cooperation in responding to this questionnaire. The completed questionnaire shall be submitted directly via email to George Lingris, Contract Specialist, george.r.lingris.civ@mail.mil subject line in the submission email shall clearly indicate: ‘[Offeror Name] W52P1J-16-R-0134 message shall originate from the PPQ respondent’s Government or corporate email address.
1. GENERAL GUIDANCE
Please use the following rating in scoring the performance elements below (assessments should reflect only contractor-liable performance):
| RATING |
| DESCRIPTION |
| Excellent |
| The Offeror's past performance far exceeds the customer's expectations and provided significant, unusual worthwhile features or benefits. |
| Good |
| The Offeror’s past performance exceeds the customer's expectations and provided significant, unusual worthwhile features or benefits. |
| Satisfactory |
| The Offeror's past performance met the customer's expectations and contract requirements. |
| Marginal |
| The Offeror's past performance could have been improved. The Offeror required major agency resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements. |
| Unsatisfactory |
| The Offeror's past performance did not meet customer expectations and/or contract requirements. |
GENERAL INFORMATION
| II-A | RESPONDENT IDENTIFICATION / POC |
| 1. | |
| Name & Title: |
| 2. |
| Organization: |
| 3. |
| Address: |
| 4. |
| Phone No: |
| 5. |
| E-mail: |
| 6. |
| Date: |
| II-B | CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION |
| 1. | |
| Offeror: |
| 2. |
| DoD Entity (CAGE) Code of Evaluated Contractor: |
| 3. |
| Type of Instrument - Contract/Order/Subcontract/Other: |
| 4. |
| If Sub contract identify Prime Contractor: |
| 5. |
| Contract Identification Number: |
| 6. |
| Order Number (if applicable): |
| 7. |
| Project Title and Demil Description (add rows if needed, up to 200 words): |
| 8. |
| Pricing Type (e.g., Fixed Price, Time and Materials, Cost Reimbursable): |
| 9. |
| Date of Award: |
| 10. |
| Date work effort/contract will end: |
| 11. |
| Initial Contract Dollar Value (w/Options): |
| 12. |
| Current/Final Contract Dollar Value (w/Options): |
| 13 |
| Period of Performance (including all options) |
| 14. |
| Place(s) of Performance: |
III-C GENERAL INFORMATION
| 1. |
| Respondent’s Role (e.g., COR, Contracting Officer) for evaluated contract and length of time in role: |
| 2. |
| Has this contract been partially or completely terminated? If yes, explain and identify type of termination (e.g., default, convenience). |
| 3. |
| If this was an award or incentive fee contract, what percentage of the available fee did the Contractor receive (if applicable, breakout by performance period)? |
| 4. |
| Were there any changes in contract dollar amounts throughout the life of the contract; and if so, please explain (e.g., Government or Contractor driven): |
| 5. |
| Were there any PQDR’s issued on this contract; and if so please explain how resolved. |
| 6. |
| Compliance with FAT (if applicable)? |
III-D CONTRACT PERFORMANCE
Please Rate This Contractor With Respect To:
1. Conforming to the contract requirements including specifications, standards of good workmanship, and technical direction:
| Rating |
| Excellent |
| Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
Check
Comment: ___________________________________________________________________
1. Contractor’s ability to deliver according to the agreed-to schedule. What were the causes of any schedule variances?
| Rating |
| Excellent |
| Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
Check
1. Contractor’s ability to identify and correct problems and prevent or mitigate potential problems in a timely manner:
| Rating |
| Excellent |
| Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
Check
1. Satisfaction level of work effort performed:
| Rating |
| Excellent |
| Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
Check
1. Has the contractor demonstrated reasonable and cooperative behavior in dealing with your staff and other contractors (including responsiveness and the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes):
| Rating |
| Excellent |
| Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
Check
1. Contractor’s compliance with security requirements OSHA and EPA:
| Rating |
| Excellent |
| Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
Check
1. Contractor’s ability to meet First Article Test (FAT) scheduling and did the product meet your required level of quality during production and the product delivery phases.
| Rating |
| Excellent |
| Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
Check
IV RETURN INFORMATION
When completed, please send electronically via email to:
George Lingris, Contract Specialist, george.r.lingris.civ@mail.mil Thank you for your assistance.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .