Section L Attachment A Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL

80SSC024R0004

COMBINED OPERATIONS, SERVICES, MAINTENANCE AND INFASTRUCTURE

CONTRACT (COSMIC)

ATTACHMENT L.I-23A

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

RFP 80SSC024R0004

Attachment L.I-23A – Past Performance Questionnaire

This questionnaire contains Source Selection Information when completed. See FAR 2.101 & 3.104

• Significant Amount (Sig) -- Routinely performed the full range of services for the SOW/PWS element(s).

• Moderate Amount (Mod) -- Performed several aspects of the SOW/PWS element(s) with moderate frequency.

• Minimal Amount (Min) -- Performed at least some aspects of the SOW/PWS element(s), although such performance was limited in scope or frequency.

• Not Applicable (NA) -- Did not perform the SOW/PWS element(s) under your contract.

I. CONTRACT INFORMATION (OFFERORS COMPLETE SECTION I ONLY):

A. Company Being Evaluated and Contract Information:

Company Name (Specific Division)

Company Address

Cage Code or DUNS number Contract Number Total Contract Value $ Average Annual Workforce Count

Average Annual Contract Actual Amount

$______________ (i.e., The current contract expenditures to date divided by the number of years of performance to date)

Period of Performance Start Date: End Date:

Description of Work Performed Percentage of work performed/responsible for (applicable if past performance is for subcontract performance only)

Award/Incentive Fee (provide ratings that the contractor received over the past 3 years)

Rating Period: Rating:

Rating Period: Rating:

Rating Period: Rating:

Rating Period: Rating:

Rating Period: Rating:

Rating Period: Rating:

B. Contract Type (Check all that apply):

Check all that apply: Check all that apply:

Prime Contractor Firm Fixed Price Subcontractor Cost Plus Fixed Fee Joint Venture Partner/ Team

Member Cost Plus Award Fee

Other: Cost Plus Incentive Fee Time and Material Indefinite Delivery, Indefinite Quantity Other:

II. EVALUATOR(S) THAT COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE:

*If possible, please ensure the Technical Customer and CO jointly complete/coordinate on the questionnaire.

Name(s) Title(s) Agency/Organization Email Address Role in Program/Contract

III. PERFORMANCE RATINGS & AMOUNT OF WORK PERFORMED: Circle the rating for the appropriate blocks for both “Performance” and “Amount of Work Performed” for each element listed below using the adjective ratings and definitions above:

PWS

ELEMENT

PERFORMANCE

RATINGS

From High To Low

E,VG,S,M,U,N/A

(Please Circle One)

AMOUNT OF WORK

PERFORMED

From High To Low Sig, Mod, Min, NA (Please Circle One)

1.0 Contract

Management E VG S M U

NA

SIG MOD MIN NA

Contract Administration (Includes: Documentation and Records Management, Emergency Management, Staffing & Training)

E VG S M U

Technical and Business Management (Includes: Task Order Formulation, Resources and Financial Management, Acquisition Management, Work Control Management & Business Development)

2.0 Logistics and

Property Management

Receiving and Inspection & Packaging and Shipping Operations

Transportation, Moving, Hauling and Service Mail E VG S M U NA SIG MOD MIN NA

Supply and Material Management E VG S M U NA SIG MOD MIN NA

Redistribution, Utilization and Disposal E VG S M U NA SIG MOD MIN NA Real Property and Equipment Accountability E VG S M U NA SIG MOD MIN NA

3.0 Safety, Health &

Environmental E VG S M U NA SIG MOD MIN NA

Safety and Risk Management E VG S M U NA SIG MOD MIN NA Quality Assurance and Reliability E VG S M U NA SIG MOD MIN NA

Environmental Compliance E VG S M U NA SIG MOD MIN NA

Contamination and Foreign Object Debris Program E VG S M U NA SIG MOD MIN NA

4.0 Engineering and Manufacturing

Support

E VG S M U NA SIG MOD MIN NA

Design Engineering (Includes: Preliminary Concepts and Trade Studies, Facility Planning Facility Designs, Technical System Design Analysis and Modeling, & Drafting)

E VG S M U NA SIG MOD MIN NA

Construction Support E VG S M U NA SIG MOD MIN NA Manufacturing and Fabrication Support (Includes: Management of Shared Manufacturing Areas/Resources and Operations of Shared Manufacturing Areas/Resources)

E VG S M U NA SIG MOD MIN NA

5.0 Site Services E VG S M U NA SIG MOD MIN NA

Custodial Services E VG S M U NA SIG MOD MIN NA Grounds Maintenance and Integrated Pest Services E VG S M U NA SIG MOD MIN NA

Special Purpose Mobile Equipment Operations (Forklifts, Dump Trucks, Cranes, Supporting Equipment, etc.)

E VG S M U NA SIG MOD MIN NA

Energy Management and Controls (Building Automation)

E VG S M U NA SIG MOD MIN NA

Occupational Health Services E VG S M U NA SIG MOD MIN NA

Unmanned Aerial Systems E VG S M U NA SIG MOD MIN NA

6.0 Facility Operations

and Maintenance E VG S M U NA SIG MOD MIN NA

Facility Operations [includes, Boiler House, Landfill Operations, System Operations (potable water, power distribution, natural gas, sanitary sewer, etc.), Industrial Wastewater Treatment Facility, Utilities, Marine Structures]

Maintenance (includes, Reliability Centered Maintenance, Preventative & Corrective Maintenance)

E VG S M U NA SIG MOD MIN NA

Operations and Maintenance Engineering E VG S M U NA SIG MOD MIN NA

7.0 Environmental

Services and Program Management

E VG S M U NA SIG MOD MIN NA

Environmental services include energy management and water conservation, program management, permitting, regulatory reporting, and project and operations oversight to ensure compliance with all applicable Federal, state, and local laws and regulations.

IV. Performance Ratings: Assess the Contractor’s performance in the areas identified below.

Additional pages may be used for comments if desired. Please keep in mind that only performance in the past 3 years is relevant. If you cannot answer any questions, please circle Not Applicable (NA).

GENERAL PERFORMANCE QUESTIONS

PERFORMANCE RATING

From High To Low

E, VG, S, M, U, NA

(Please Circle One)

1. Business Relations (Communicating And Interfacing With Government) E VG S M U NA

2. Management Of Key Personnel E VG S M U NA

3. Schedule E VG S M U NA

4. Overall Performance In Planning And Controlling The Program E VG S M U NA

5. Quality Of Services And Support Provided E VG S M U NA

6. Compliance With Technical Requirements And Performance Standards E VG S M U NA

7. Content, Accuracy, Quality And Timeliness Of Technical Reports And Deliverables E VG S M U NA

8. Contractor’s Ability To Identify And Correct Performance Deficiencies In A Timely Manner E VG S M U NA

9. Compliance With Technical Process And Control Requirements (Quality Assurance, Configuration E VG S M U NA

Appendix A, CPARS Definitions

Evaluation Ratings Definitions (Excluding Utilization of Small Business)1 Rating Definition Note

Exceptional

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective.

To justify an Exceptional rating, identify multiple significant events and state how they were of benefit to the Government. A singular benefit, however, could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating. Also, there should have been no significant weaknesses identified.

Very Good

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was effective.

To justify a Very Good rating, identify a significant event and state how it was a benefit to the Government.

There should have been no significant weaknesses identified.

Satisfactory

Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

To justify a Satisfactory rating, there should have been only minor problems, or major problems the contractor recovered from without impact to the contract. There should have been no significant weaknesses identified. A fundamental principle of assigning ratings is that contractors will not be assessed a rating lower than Satisfactory solely for not performing beyond the requirements of the contract.

Marginal

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not

To justify Marginal performance, identify a significant event in each category that the contractor had trouble overcoming and state how it impacted the Government. A Marginal rating should be supported by referencing the management tool that notified the contractor of the contractual deficiency (e.g., fully implemented. management, quality, safety, or environmental deficiency report or letter).

Unsatisfactory

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

To justify an Unsatisfactory rating, identify multiple significant events in each category that the contractor had trouble overcoming and state how it impacted the Government. A singular problem, however, could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactory rating. An Unsatisfactory rating should be supported by referencing the management tools used to notify the contractor of the contractual deficiencies (e.g., management, quality, safety, or environmental deficiency reports, or letters).

NOTE 1: NA (Not Applicable) should be used if the ratings are not going to be applied to a particular area for evaluation.

Evaluation Ratings Definitions (Utilization of Small Business)2, 3 Rating Definition Note

Exceptional

Exceeded all negotiated subcontracting goals or exceeded at least one goal and met all of the other negotiated subcontracting goals for the current period. Had exceptional success with initiatives to assist, promote, and utilize small business (SB), small disadvantaged business (SDB), women-owned small business (WOSB), HUBZone small business, veteran-owned small business (VOSB) and service disabled veteran owned small business (SDVOSB). Complied with FAR 52.219-8, Utilization of Small Business Concerns. Exceeded any other small business participation requirements incorporated in the contract, including the use of small businesses in mission critical aspects of the program. Went above and beyond

To justify an Exceptional rating, identify multiple significant events and state how they were a benefit to small business utilization. A singular benefit, however, could be of such magnitude that it constitutes an Exceptional rating. Ensure that small businesses are given meaningful, innovative work directly related to the project, rather than peripheral work, such as cleaning offices, supplies, landscaping, etc. Also, there should have been no significant weaknesses identified.

the required elements of the subcontracting plan and other small business requirements of the contract.

Completed and submitted Individual Subcontract Reports and/or Summary Subcontract Reports in an accurate and timely manner.

Very Good

Met all of the negotiated subcontracting goals in the traditional socio-economic categories (SB, SDB and WOSB) and met at least one of the other socio-economic goals (HUBZone, VOSB, SDVOSB) for the current period. Had significant success with initiatives to assist, promote and utilize SB, SDB, WOSB, HUBZone, VOSB, and SDVOSB. Complied with FAR 52.219- 8, Utilization of Small Business Concerns. Met or exceeded any other small business participation requirements incorporated in the contract, including the use of small businesses in mission critical aspects of the program. Endeavored to go above and beyond the required elements of the subcontracting plan. Completed and submitted Individual Subcontract Reports and/or Summary Subcontract Reports in an accurate and timely manner.

To justify a Very Good rating, identify a significant event and state how they were a benefit to small business utilization. Ensure that small businesses are given meaningful, innovative work directly related to the project, rather than peripheral work, such as cleaning offices, supplies, landscaping, etc.

There should be no significant weaknesses identified.

Satisfactory

Demonstrated a good faith effort to meet all of the negotiated subcontracting goals in the various socio-economic categories for the current period. Complied with FAR 52.219-8, Utilization of Small Business Concerns. Met any other small business participation requirements included in the contract. Fulfilled the requirements of the subcontracting plan included in the contract. Completed and submitted Individual Subcontract Reports and/or Summary Subcontract Reports in an accurate and timely manner.

To justify a Satisfactory rating, there should have been only minor problems, or major problems the contractor has addressed or taken corrective action. There should have been no significant weaknesses identified. A fundamental principle of assigning ratings is that contractors will not be assessed a rating lower than Satisfactory solely for not performing beyond the requirements of the contract.

Marginal

Deficient in meeting key subcontracting plan elements. Deficient in complying with FAR 52.219-8, Utilization of Small Business Concerns, and any other small business participation requirements in the contract. Did not submit Individual Subcontract Reports and/or Summary Subcontract Reports in an accurate or timely manner. Failed to satisfy one or more requirements of a corrective action plan currently in place; however, does show an interest in bringing performance to a satisfactory level and has demonstrated a commitment to apply the necessary resources to do so.

Required a corrective action plan.

To justify Marginal performance, identify a significant event that the contractor had trouble overcoming and how it impacted small business utilization. A Marginal rating should be supported by referencing the actions taken by the government that notified the contractor of the contractual deficiency.

Unsatisfactory

Noncompliant with FAR 52.219-8 and 52.219-9, DFARS 252.219-7003, and any other small business participation requirements in the contract. Did not submit Individual Subcontract Reports and/or Summary Subcontract Reports in an accurate or timely manner.

Showed little interest in bringing performance to a satisfactory level or is generally uncooperative. Required a corrective action plan.

To justify an Unsatisfactory rating, identify multiple significant events that the contractor had trouble overcoming and state how it impacted small business utilization.

A singular problem, however, could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an Unsatisfactory rating. An Unsatisfactory rating should be supported by referencing the actions taken by the government to notify the contractor of the deficiencies. When an Unsatisfactory rating is justified, the contracting officer must consider whether the contractor made a good faith effort to comply with the requirements of the subcontracting plan required by FAR 52.219-9 and follow the procedures outlined in FAR 52.219-16, Liquidated Damages-Subcontracting Plan.

NOTE 2: For subcontracting plans under the DoD Comprehensive Small Business Subcontracting Plan (Test Program), DFARS 252.219-7004, the ratings entered in CPARS shall mirror those assigned by the Defense Contract Management Agency who is responsible for monitoring such plans.

NOTE 3: Generally, zero (0) percent is not a goal unless the Contracting Officer determined when negotiating the subcontracting plan that no subcontracting opportunities exist in a particular socio-economic category. In such cases, the contractor shall be considered to have met the goal for any socio-economic category where the goal negotiated in the plan was zero.