Exhibit N- Freetown.docx

DOCX document 25 KB Posted

Attached to
Local Guard Program Freetown, Sierra Leone Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
SAQMMA12R0007
Issued by
Department of State Office of Acquisition Management

About this file

This document contains a past performance questionnaire and information on a solicitation for local guard services at the U.S. Embassy in Freetown, Sierra Leone. The past performance questionnaire requests ratings on management ability, quality control, cost and pricing, and general impressions of a contractor's prior work on an unspecified program. It will be used to evaluate proposals submitted in response to Solicitation SAQMMA12R0007.

The solicitation seeks proposals for local guard services at the U.S. Embassy in Freetown, Sierra Leone over a one year base period and four one-year options. The contractor must provide organizational structure, management, and qualified staff to secure the embassy and prevent loss, injury, destruction of assets, and deter potential terrorist attacks. All guards must pass background investigations by both the contractor and U.S. government. The project manager must have a minimum English proficiency level of 3. The Department of State plans to post the solicitation on February 13, 2012. The proposal submission window is approximately 60 days, with site visits scheduled for March. Preferences will be given to U.S. persons or joint ventures. The contract will be awarded based on best value with price being a substantial factor.

Exhibit N

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Local Guard Program Freetown, Sierra Leone, newest first.
File Type Posted
Freetown Q A(Final).pdf PDF
Exhibit M(A002).xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Exhibit D(A002) - Freetown.pdf PDF
Exhibit A(No Address) - A002.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Exhibit E(A002).pdf PDF
SAQMMA12R0007(A002).pdf PDF
EXHIBIT Q(A002).pdf PDF
SAQMMA12R0007(A001).pdf PDF
Exhibit J - Freetown.docx DOCX document
Exhibit A(No Address) - Freetown.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Exhibit B - Freetown.docx DOCX document
Exhibit G - Freetown.docx DOCX document
Exhibit H - Freetown.docx DOCX document
Exhibit O - Freetown.docx DOCX document
Exhibit I - Sample.pdf PDF
Exhibit D - Freetown.docx DOCX document
Exhibit F - Freetown.docx DOCX document
EXHIBIT Q - Freetown.docx DOCX document
Exhibit S - Freetown.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
SAQMMA12R0007 Freetown(Final).doc DOC document
Exhibit M - Freetown.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
SAQMMA12R0007- 05APR12.pdf PDF
Exhibit C - Freetown.docx DOCX document
Exhibit L - Freetown.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Exhibit E - Freetown.docx DOCX document
Exhibit K -Freetown.docx DOCX document
Exhibit R- Freetown.docx DOCX document
Exhibit P - Freetown.docx DOCX document
Show all 28

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

EXHIBIT N – PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Please complete this questionnaire based on the following guidance:

Handwritten responses are sufficient.

Indicate, based on the codes below, the contractor’s performance on the identified program. Assessments should reflect only contractor liable performance. The following is a definition of the scoring levels:

PERFORMANCE LEVEL
CODE
EXCELLENT
(E)
Indicates that the contractor’s performance within the area of evaluation clearly exceeds contractual requirements.
SATISFACTORY
(S)
Indicates no problems exist in the area of evaluation or has only minor problems for which solutions are in hand.
MARGINAL
(M)
Indicates the area of evaluation contains an existing problem for which there is doubt whether the identified solution is adequate but the problem appears to be within the contractor’s ability to solve.
UNSATISFACTORY
(U)
Indicates a serious problem exists in the evaluation area which may be outside the contractor’s ability to solve. The contractor is in danger of not being able to satisfy contractual requirements and timely recovery in not likely.
NOT APPLICABLE
(N)
Performance did not include such efforts or performance was not observed.

Please circle a letter corresponding to your rating or ‘N/A’ if you are unable to provide a rating for an area.

FOR ANY RATING BELOW SATISFACTORY, A CLARIFICATION AND EXPLANATION IS REQUESTED. IF MORE SPACE IS NEEDED, USE THE BACK OF THIS QUESTIONNAIRE.

You are urged to supplement your knowledge of the contractor’s performance with the judgment of others in your organization. In addition to completing the attached questionnaire for the identified program, we solicit your comments on other similar programs for which your activity has contracts with this offeror.

If you have any questions, please contact Larry A. Pruitt Jr. at (571) 345-2359 or pruittla@state.gov.

PROGRAM IDENTIFICATION

A.
Contractor Name/Division:
B.
Contract Number:
C.
Contract Effort or Program Title:
D.
Contract Type (fixed price, etc.):
E.
Estimated Amount/Annual Volume of Service:
F.
Period of Performance:
G.
Brief Description of contract effort or task:

SOLICITATION S-AQMMA-12-R-0086

U.S. MISSION FREETOWN, SIERRA LEONE

SOLICITATION S-AQMMA-12-R-0007

U.S. EMBASSY FREETOWN, SIERRA LEONE

I. MANAGEMENT ABILITY

1.
The contractor provided experienced executives, including project manager and supervisors and replacements with the technical and administrative qualifications required to meet the contract requirements.
E
S
M
U
N/A
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
2.
The contractor’s delegation of authority to project manager and supervisors met contract requirements.
E
S
M
U
N/A
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
3.
The contractor provided adequate resources personnel/ equipment) in each specialty necessary to fulfill contractual requirements.
E
S
M
U
N/A
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
4.
The contractor provided effective emergency response actions and corrective actions to cover incidents such as: disruption of utilities, accidents, material shortages, safety, security, and hazardous materials handling incidents.
E
S
M
U
N/A
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|

II. QUALITY CONTROL

1.
Contractor provided effective Quality/ Inspection procedures and personnel to meet contract requirements.
E
S
M
U
N/A
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
2.
When deficiencies were reported, the contractor took effective corrective actions pursuant to their Quality Control procedures.
E
S
M
U
N/A
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
3.
Contractor completed projects and subsequent corrective actions, including punch-list items, in a timely manner.
E
S
M
U
N/A
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|

III. COST/PRICE

The contractor provided accurate and timely proposals for change orders.
E
S
M
U
N/A
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|

IV. GENERAL

Given the opportunity, would your organization enter another contractual relationship with this contractor in the future?
Yes
No
|_|
|_|

V. RESPONSE INFORMATION

The following information will assist in the analysis of the data. This information will be kept confidential.

Name of evaluator: ______________________________________________
Office symbol and address: _______________________________________
______________________________________________________________
Phone/FAX/Email: ______________________________________________
Position/Title: __________________________________________________
Length of involvement in Program/Contract: __________________________
Source of Information/Documentation utilized to rate Performance Level:_________________________________________________________
Date Questionnaire Completed: ____________________________________

VI. COMMENTS

NOTE: Additional comments are appreciated:

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .