Proctor_for_Earthwork_(stockpile).pdf
PDF 975 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Flying Fortress Parkway Phase II
- Solicitation number
- 2026-IFB-003
- Issued by
- Mohave County, Arizona
About this file
This is a Soil and Aggregate Test Report prepared by Western Technologies Inc. for Pulice Construction, Inc. related to the Kingman-Ash Fork Highway (I-40) project in Arizona, with testing conducted on native soil samples from the I-40 west corridor near Kingman, Arizona. The report documents proctor compaction testing and soil classification analysis for earthwork and stockpile materials intended for highway ramp construction. Three soil samples were collected and tested from stations 2956+92, 2967+76, and 2974+20 along the project corridor between January 15 and January 24, 2025. All samples were classified as silty sand with gravel or variations thereof (SC-SM group symbol under ASTM D2487), with testing performed using standard AASHTO and ASTM methodologies including sieve analysis, liquid and plastic limit determination, water content analysis, and Los Angeles abrasion testing. The samples exhibited dry unit weights ranging from approximately 120.5 to 122.0 pounds per cubic foot with water content values between 9.1 and 11.8 percent, demonstrating consistency across the test locations.
The report provides detailed geotechnical parameters essential for earthwork design and quality control during construction, including plasticity indices, swell test data, expansion indices, and laboratory compaction characteristics. Testing specifications referenced AASHTO R58 for dry preparation methodology and AASHTO T89 Method B for compaction analysis, with manual rammer application at standardized effort levels. The soil samples showed fines content (material passing the No. 200 sieve) ranging from 17 to 20 percent and various gradation results across multiple sieve sizes. pH determination, salinity analysis including sulfate and chloride testing, and resistivity measurements were conducted to assess potential deleterious effects on concrete structures. The report explicitly notes that testing results relate only to the observed conditions and samples tested at the specified time and location, with no warranty extended regarding source material confirmation or other conditions not directly tested.
View the file
Other files
Show all 24
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Soil / Aggregate Test Report
Comments:
425 © 10/01/22 WT
Client Page of
Lab No.
Date Date
Project Project Address Material Description Material Use Material Source Sample Location Special Instructions
Sieve analysis Finer Than No. 200
Sieve Accumulative % passing Specification Sample Preparation
Rammer Used
Oversize Aggregate
Liquid Limit, Plastic Limit & Plasticity Index
Preparation method
Processing method
Liquid Limit LL
Plastic Limit PL
Plasticity Index PI
Water Content % dry weight
Swell Test Surcharge psf Expansion, %
Compacted to approximately of ASTM Method
Initial water content % Dry unit weight lbf/ft3
Organic Matter %
Unified Soil Classification
Group Symbol: Name:
Result Specs. Result Specs.
| Grading | rev., % loss |
| Grading | rev., % loss |
Fractured Faces By Weight One or more, % Two or more, %
Total Salts (Solubility) %
Sulfates %
Chlorides pH Determination pH
Minimum Resistivity ohm-cm
Expansion Index of Soil EI
Initial dry unit weight, lbf/ft3
Initial degree of saturation
Initial water content, % Final water content, %
Water content, %
D ry u ni t w ei gh t, lb f/ ft
Laboratory compaction characteristics Method
Los Angeles (LA) Abrasion
The services referred to herein were performed in accordance with the standard of care practiced locally for the referenced method(s) and relate only to the condition(s) observed or sample(s) tested at the time and place stated herein. Western Technologies Inc. (WT) makes no other warranty or representation, express or implied, and has not confirmed information including source of materials submitted by others. This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the prior written approval of WT.
Reviewed By
ARIZ 248 #1
3 in.
1/4 in.
1 in.
No. 10
J. VAN VLIET
Assumed bulk specific gravity
Silty Clayey Sand with Gravel
No. 40
1.0
6 in.
NATIVE ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE I-40
AASHTO R58, Dry Preparation
25-424473-0
01/15/25
ADOT 040 MO 055 H681401C KINGMAN – ASH FORK HWY (I-40)
ARIZ 248 #1
1.5
Steve Campbell
Brian Dean, Project Manager
2 in.
HWY RAMPS
ASTM D2487
3/4 in.
No. 16
Oven-dried
AASHTO T90
2.60
ARIZ 221
No. 4
No. 50
No. 100
1-40 west, Kingman, AZ
J. VAN VLIET
JUAN W/ PULICE
120.5
01/24/25
D
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85255
8660 E. HARTFORD DRIVE
SUITE 305
PULICE CONSTRUCTION, INC.
3/8 in.
AASHTO T89, Method B 26
01/15/25
Moist
AASHTO T89
No. 200
No. 8
SC-SM
4 in.
10.5
01/15/25
1-1/2 in.
SILTY SAND WITH GRAVEL
1/2 in.
No. 30
01/15/25
Manual
27441
STA 2956+92
ASTM D2216, Method A
Assumed absorption, %
425 © 10/01/22 WT
Client Page of
Lab No.
Date
Project Address Material Description Material Use Material Source Sample Location Special Instructions
Sieve analysis Finer Than No. 200
Sieve Accumulative
Processing method
Liquid Limit LL
Plastic Limit PL
Plasticity Index PI
Water Content % dry weight
Swell Test Surcharge psf Expansion, %
Compacted to approximately of ASTM Method
Initial water content % Dry unit weight lbf/ft3
Organic Matter %
Unified Soil Classification
Group Symbol: Name:
Result Specs. Result Specs.
| Grading | rev., % loss |
| Grading | rev., % loss |
Fractured Faces By Weight One or more, % Two or more, %
Total Salts (Solubility) %
Sulfates %
Chlorides pH Determination pH
Minimum Resistivity ohm-cm
Expansion Index of Soil EI
Initial dry unit weight, lbf/ft3
Initial degree of saturation
Initial water content, % Final water content, %
Water content, %
D ry u ni t w ei gh t, lb f/ ft
Laboratory compaction characteristics Method
Los Angeles (LA) Abrasion
The services referred to herein were performed in accordance with the standard of care practiced locally for the referenced method(s) and relate only to the condition(s) observed or sample(s) tested at the time and place stated herein. Western Technologies Inc. (WT) makes no other warranty or representation, express or implied, and has not confirmed information including source of materials submitted by others. This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the prior written approval of WT.
Reviewed By
ARIZ 248 #1
3 in.
1/4 in.
1 in.
No. 10
B. VEGAS
Assumed bulk specific gravity
Silty Clayey Sand with Gravel
No. 40
1.0
6 in.
STA 2967+76
AASHTO R58, Dry Preparation
25-424473-0
01/15/25
ADOT 040 MO 055 H681401C KINGMAN – ASH FORK HWY (I-40)
ARIZ 248 #3
1.0
Steve Campbell
Brian Dean, Project Manager
2 in.
HWY RAMPS
ASTM D2487
3/4 in.
No. 16
Oven-dried
AASHTO T90
2.60
ARIZ 221
No. 4
No. 50
No. 100
1-40 west - Kingman, AZ
J. VAN VLIET
J. VAN VLIET
121.3
01/24/25
8.5
D
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85255
8660 E. HARTFORD DRIVE
SUITE 305
PULICE CONSTRUCTION, INC.
Corrected optimum water content, %
3/8 in.
AASHTO T89, Method B 24
01/15/25
Moist
AASHTO T89
No. 200
No. 8
SC-SM
4 in.
9.1
01/15/25
1-1/2 in.
123.5
SILTY SAND AND GRAVEL
1/2 in.
No. 30
01/15/25
Corrected maximum density, lbf/ft³
Oversize Correction: ASTM D4718
Manual
27442
STA 2967+76 WEST AND EAST OF HWY NATIVE
425 © 10/01/22 WT
Client Page of
Lab No.
Date
Project Address Material Description Material Use Material Source Sample Location Special Instructions
Sieve analysis Finer Than No. 200
Sieve Accumulative
Processing method
Liquid Limit LL
Plastic Limit PL
Plasticity Index PI
Water Content % dry weight
Swell Test Surcharge psf Expansion, %
Compacted to approximately of ASTM Method
Initial water content % Dry unit weight lbf/ft3
Organic Matter %
Unified Soil Classification
Group Symbol: Name:
Result Specs. Result Specs.
| Grading | rev., % loss |
| Grading | rev., % loss |
Fractured Faces By Weight One or more, % Two or more, %
Total Salts (Solubility) %
Sulfates %
Chlorides pH Determination pH
Minimum Resistivity ohm-cm
Expansion Index of Soil EI
Initial dry unit weight, lbf/ft3
Initial degree of saturation
Initial water content, % Final water content, %
Water content, %
D ry u ni t w ei gh t, lb f/ ft
Laboratory compaction characteristics Method
Los Angeles (LA) Abrasion
The services referred to herein were performed in accordance with the standard of care practiced locally for the referenced method(s) and relate only to the condition(s) observed or sample(s) tested at the time and place stated herein. Western Technologies Inc. (WT) makes no other warranty or representation, express or implied, and has not confirmed information including source of materials submitted by others. This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the prior written approval of WT.
Reviewed By
ARIZ 248 #1
3 in.
1/4 in.
1 in.
No. 10
Assumed bulk specific gravity
Silty Clayey Sand
No. 40
1.0
6 in.
WEST AND EAST HWY NATIVE
AASHTO R58, Dry Preparation
25-424473-0
ADOT 040 MO 055 H681401C KINGMAN – ASH FORK HWY (I-40)
ARIZ 248 #1
1.6
Steve Campbell
Brian Dean, Project Manager
2 in.
HWY RAMPS
ASTM D2487
3/4 in.
No. 16
Oven-dried
AASHTO T90
2.60
ARIZ 221
No. 4
No. 50
No. 100
1-40 west - Kingman, AZ
122.0
01/24/25
D
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85255
8660 E. HARTFORD DRIVE
SUITE 305
PULICE CONSTRUCTION, INC.
3/8 in.
AASHTO T89, Method B 21
Moist
AASHTO T89
No. 200
No. 8
SC-SM
4 in.
11.8
01/15/25
1-1/2 in.
SILTY SAND GRAVEL
1/2 in.
No. 30
01/15/25
Manual
27443
STA 2974+20
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .