NTHC EXHIBIT PHASE 1 EVALUATION CUMULATIVE SCORESHEET.pdf

PDF 195 KB Posted

Attached to
1475-25-R-RFQF-00006
Solicitation number
3140004204
Issued by
Adams County, Mississippi

About this file

The document is a Phase 1 Evaluation Cumulative Scoresheet for the Natchez Tribal History Center (NTHC) Exhibit Design/Build Request for Qualifications (RFQ #3140004204), issued by the Mississippi Department of Archives and History. The scoresheet evaluates 20 different vendors across three primary evaluation categories: Technical Factors (40 points max), Management Factors (20 points max), and Cost (25 points max), with a total possible score of 85 points. Each vendor was assessed by five evaluators (Cindy, Jessica, Lance, Sarah, and Shane) on specific subcategories including past project experience, innovative technology use, fabrication and installation capabilities, project planning, and project team composition.

The evaluation revealed that Kubik Maltbie, Inc. ranked highest with a cumulative score of 349.80, followed by Creo Industrial Arts LLC at 337.38 and Formations Inc. at 334.00. The cost component was calculated using a formula that awarded the maximum 25 points to the lowest cost proposal, with other proposals receiving proportional points based on their relative cost. While the specific total project budget was not detailed in this document, the comprehensive evaluation process suggests a rigorous selection methodology aimed at identifying the most qualified and cost-effective vendor for designing and building exhibits at the Natchez Tribal History Center, with a focus on comprehensively representing the history and cultural significance of the Natchez Indians.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
download.pdf PDF
AMENDMENT 1 PART 5.jpeg JPEG file
NTHC RFQ CLARION LEDGER PUBLIC NOTICE.pdf PDF
NTHC RFQ EXHIBIT DESIGNER AMENDMENT 2.pdf PDF
NTHC RFQ SHORT LIST DIRECT DISTRIBUTION.pdf PDF
NTHC RFQ SOLICITATION EMAILS.pdf PDF
NTHC WEBSITE SCREENSHOT 2025-04-17.png PNG image
RFQ 3140004202 AMENDMENT 1 COMPRESSED_PART7.pdf PDF
RFQ 3140004202 AMENDMENT 1 COMPRESSED_PART8.pdf PDF
RFQ 3140004204 PHASE I SCORES - SHANE KEIL.pdf PDF
SHORT LIST FIRMS ANNOUNCEMENT SCREENSHOT.png PNG image
NTHC RFQ EXHIBIT DESIGNER REDO_D5.pdf PDF
AMENDMENT 1 PART 4.jpeg JPEG file
NOTICE OF INTENT TO AWARD.pdf PDF
NTHC BID PORTAL SCREENSHOT 2025-04-17.png PNG image
NTHC EXHIBIT INTERVIEW PHASE EVALUATION CUMULATIVE SCORESHEET.pdf PDF
NTHC EXHIBIT RFQ COST SCORES.pdf PDF
PURVIEW DETERMINATION.pdf PDF
RFQ 3140004202 AMENDMENT 1 COMPRESSED_PART1.pdf PDF
download.jpeg JPEG file
AMENDMENT SCREENSHOT MDAH WEBSITE.png PNG image
CLARION LEDGER ORDER CONFIRMATION.pdf PDF
EVALUATOR CERTIFICATIONS.pdf PDF
NTHC RFQ AMENDMENT DIRECT DISTRIBUTION.pdf PDF
RFQ 3140002404 INTERVIEW SCORES - CINDY GARDNER.pdf PDF
RFQ 3140004202 AMENDMENT 1 COMPRESSED_PART2.pdf PDF
RFQ 3140004202 AMENDMENT 1 COMPRESSED_PART3.pdf PDF
RFQ 3140004202 AMENDMENT 1 COMPRESSED_PART6.pdf PDF
RFQ 3140004204 INTERVIEW SCORES - JESSICA WALZER.pdf PDF
RFQ 3140004204 INTERVIEW SCORES - LANCE HARRIS.pdf PDF
RFQ 3140004204 INTERVIEW SCORES - SARAH DURHAM.pdf PDF
RFQ 3140004204 INTERVIEW SCORES - SHANE KEIL.pdf PDF
RFQ 3140004204 PHASE I SCORES - JESSICA WALZER.pdf PDF
RFQ 3140004204 PHASE I SCORES - SARAH DURHAM.pdf PDF
RFQ 3140004204 SCORES - LANCE HARRIS.pdf PDF
RFQ ADVERTISEMENT - NTHC EXHIBIT DESIGN AND BUILD.pdf PDF
RFQ-SHORT-LIST-ANNOUNCEMENT.pdf PDF
AMENDMENT SCREENSHOT PROCUREMENT PORTAL.png PNG image
NTHC EXHIBIT RFQ EVALUATION COMITTEE REPORT.pdf PDF
NTHC RFQ REVIEW EXTENSION DIRECT DISTRIBUTION.pdf PDF
REVIEW EXTENSION.pdf PDF
RFQ 3140004204 PHASE I SCORES - CINDY GARDNER COMPRESSED.pdf PDF
Show all 42

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

NTHC Exhibit Phase 1 Evaluation Cumulative Scoresheet

Exhibit Design/Build Natchez Tribal History Center RFQ # 3140004204 Short List Evaluation Score Form

List of Evaluation Factors Weight of Factor (%) Points Range of Factor Cindy Jessica Lance Sarah Shane Points Awarded Technical Factors = 40 points max

Past experience on projects of similar scope 15% 0 - 15 points 13.00 10.00 13.00 5.00 14.00 55.00

Innovative use of technology and techniques 10% 0 - 10 points 8.00 5.00 8.00 5.00 8.00 34.00

Fabrication and installation 15% 0 - 15 points 13.00 9.00 13.00 15.00 15.00 65.00

Management Factors = 20 points max

Project Plan 10% 0 - 10 points 8.00 7.00 8.00 5.00 10.00 38.00

Project Team 10% 0 - 10 points 8.00 8.00 8.00 10.00 10.00 44.00

Cost = 25 points max

Cost: The maximum of 25 points will be assigned to the lowest cost received. All other proposal costs received will scored relative to the lowest cost received by the formula:A/B x 25 (where A equals the lowest cost received, B equals offeror’s cost)

25% 0 - 25 points 17.43713 17.43713 17.43713 17.43713 17.43713 87.18565

TOTAL SCORE Total = 85 points 67.44 56.44 67.44 57.44 74.44 323.19

Vendor Name: 1220 Exhibits, Inc.

Center RFQ # 3140004204 Short List Evaluation Score Form

List of Evaluation Factors Weight of Factor (%) Points Range of Factor Cindy Jessica Lance Sarah Shane Points Awarded Technical Factors = 40 points max

Past experience on projects of similar scope 15% 0 - 15 points 10.00 10.00 12.00 5.00 12.00 49.00

Innovative use of technology and techniques 10% 0 - 10 points 8.00 8.00 10.00 0.00 8.00 34.00

Fabrication and installation 15% 0 - 15 points 14.00 10.00 12.00 15.00 12.00 63.00

Management Factors = 20 points max

Project Plan 10% 0 - 10 points 8.00 7.00 8.00 5.00 9.00 37.00

Project Team 10% 0 - 10 points 8.00 8.00 7.00 10.00 10.00 43.00

Cost = 25 points max

Cost: The maximum of 25 points will be assigned to the lowest cost received. All other proposal costs received will scored relative to the lowest cost received by the formula:A/B x 25 (where A equals the lowest cost received, B equals offeror’s cost)

25% 0 - 25 points 16.53324 16.53324 16.53324 16.53324 16.53324 82.66620

TOTAL SCORE Total = 85 points 64.53 59.53 65.53 51.53 67.53 308.67

Vendor Name: BRC Imagination Arts, LLC

Center RFQ # 3140004204 Short List Evaluation Score Form

List of Evaluation Factors Weight of Factor (%) Points Range of Factor Cindy Jessica Lance Sarah Shane Points Awarded Technical Factors = 40 points max

Past experience on projects of similar scope 15% 0 - 15 points 7.00 6.00 8.00 5.00 12.00 38.00

Innovative use of technology and techniques 10% 0 - 10 points 7.00 5.00 5.00 0.00 7.00 24.00

Fabrication and installation 15% 0 - 15 points 7.00 8.00 8.00 10.00 13.00 46.00

Management Factors = 20 points max

Project Plan 10% 0 - 10 points 8.00 7.00 7.00 10.00 9.00 41.00

Project Team 10% 0 - 10 points 7.00 7.00 7.00 5.00 9.00 35.00

Cost = 25 points max

Cost: The maximum of 25 points will be assigned to the lowest cost received. All other proposal costs received will scored relative to the lowest cost received by the formula:A/B x 25 (where A equals the lowest cost received, B equals offeror’s cost)

25% 0 - 25 points 19.33758 19.33758 19.33758 19.33758 19.33758 96.68790

TOTAL SCORE Total = 85 points 55.34 52.34 54.34 49.34 69.34 280.69

Vendor Name: Chicago Scenic Studios, Inc.

Center RFQ # 3140004204 Short List Evaluation Score Form

List of Evaluation Factors Weight of Factor (%) Points Range of Factor Cindy Jessica Lance Sarah Shane Points Awarded Technical Factors = 40 points max

Past experience on projects of similar scope 15% 0 - 15 points 12.00 12.00 10.00 5.00 12.00 51.00

Innovative use of technology and techniques 10% 0 - 10 points 8.00 7.00 6.00 0.00 8.00 29.00

Fabrication and installation 15% 0 - 15 points 13.00 12.00 10.00 15.00 15.00 65.00

Management Factors = 20 points max

Project Plan 10% 0 - 10 points 8.00 6.00 7.00 10.00 8.00 39.00

Project Team 10% 0 - 10 points 8.00 7.00 8.00 10.00 8.00 41.00

Cost = 25 points max

Cost: The maximum of 25 points will be assigned to the lowest cost received. All other proposal costs received will scored relative to the lowest cost received by the formula:A/B x 25 (where A equals the lowest cost received, B equals offeror’s cost)

25% 0 - 25 points 17.79231 17.79231 17.79231 17.79231 17.79231 88.96155

TOTAL SCORE Total = 85 points 66.79 61.79 58.79 57.79 68.79 313.96

Vendor Name: Color-Ad, Inc.

Center RFQ # 3140004204 Short List Evaluation Score Form

List of Evaluation Factors Weight of Factor (%) Points Range of Factor Cindy Jessica Lance Sarah Shane Points Awarded Technical Factors = 40 points max

Past experience on projects of similar scope 15% 0 - 15 points 14.00 13.00 11.00 10.00 13.00 61.00

Innovative use of technology and techniques 10% 0 - 10 points 8.00 8.00 7.00 5.00 7.00 35.00

Fabrication and installation 15% 0 - 15 points 13.00 9.00 9.00 15.00 15.00 61.00

Management Factors = 20 points max

Project Plan 10% 0 - 10 points 8.00 7.00 7.00 10.00 10.00 42.00

Project Team 10% 0 - 10 points 8.00 7.00 7.00 10.00 10.00 42.00

Cost = 25 points max

Cost: The maximum of 25 points will be assigned to the lowest cost received. All other proposal costs received will scored relative to the lowest cost received by the formula:A/B x 25 (where A equals the lowest cost received, B equals offeror’s cost)

25% 0 - 25 points 19.27500 19.27500 19.27500 19.27500 19.27500 96.37500

TOTAL SCORE Total = 85 points 70.28 63.28 60.28 69.28 74.28 337.38

Vendor Name: Creo Industrial Arts LLC

Center RFQ # 3140004204 Short List Evaluation Score Form

List of Evaluation Factors Weight of Factor (%) Points Range of Factor Cindy Jessica Lance Sarah Shane Points Awarded Technical Factors = 40 points max

Past experience on projects of similar scope 15% 0 - 15 points 12.00 9.00 11.00 0.00 11.00 43.00

Innovative use of technology and techniques 10% 0 - 10 points 7.00 5.00 7.00 5.00 8.00 32.00

Fabrication and installation 15% 0 - 15 points 13.00 9.00 12.00 0.00 13.00 47.00

Management Factors = 20 points max

Project Plan 10% 0 - 10 points 8.00 7.00 7.00 0.00 7.00 29.00

Project Team 10% 0 - 10 points 8.00 7.00 8.00 10.00 7.00 40.00

Cost = 25 points max

Cost: The maximum of 25 points will be assigned to the lowest cost received. All other proposal costs received will scored relative to the lowest cost received by the formula:A/B x 25 (where A equals the lowest cost received, B equals offeror’s cost)

25% 0 - 25 points 16.42756 16.42756 16.42756 16.42756 16.42756 82.13780

TOTAL SCORE Total = 85 points 64.43 53.43 61.43 31.43 62.43 273.14

Vendor Name: Eisterhold Associates, Inc.

Center RFQ # 3140004204 Short List Evaluation Score Form

List of Evaluation Factors Weight of Factor (%) Points Range of Factor Cindy Jessica Lance Sarah Shane Points Awarded Technical Factors = 40 points max

Past experience on projects of similar scope 15% 0 - 15 points 14.00 9.00 12.00 5.00 15.00 55.00

Innovative use of technology and techniques 10% 0 - 10 points 8.00 4.00 8.00 0.00 9.00 29.00

Fabrication and installation 15% 0 - 15 points 14.00 10.00 11.00 10.00 15.00 60.00

Management Factors = 20 points max

Project Plan 10% 0 - 10 points 8.00 7.00 8.00 0.00 10.00 33.00

Project Team 10% 0 - 10 points 9.00 8.00 8.00 10.00 10.00 45.00

Cost = 25 points max

Cost: The maximum of 25 points will be assigned to the lowest cost received. All other proposal costs received will scored relative to the lowest cost received by the formula:A/B x 25 (where A equals the lowest cost received, B equals offeror’s cost)

25% 0 - 25 points 16.52143 16.52143 16.52143 16.52143 16.52143 82.60715

TOTAL SCORE Total = 85 points 69.52 54.52 63.52 41.52 75.52 304.61

Vendor Name: Exhibit Concepts Inc.

Center RFQ # 3140004204 Short List Evaluation Score Form

List of Evaluation Factors Weight of Factor (%) Points Range of Factor Cindy Jessica Lance Sarah Shane Points Awarded Technical Factors = 40 points max

Past experience on projects of similar scope 15% 0 - 15 points 13.00 10.00 13.00 5.00 12.00 53.00

Innovative use of technology and techniques 10% 0 - 10 points 8.00 6.00 8.00 5.00 8.00 35.00

Fabrication and installation 15% 0 - 15 points 13.00 11.00 11.00 15.00 12.00 62.00

Management Factors = 20 points max

Project Plan 10% 0 - 10 points 8.00 9.00 7.00 5.00 9.00 38.00

Project Team 10% 0 - 10 points 8.00 7.00 8.00 10.00 9.00 42.00

Cost = 25 points max

Cost: The maximum of 25 points will be assigned to the lowest cost received. All other proposal costs received will scored relative to the lowest cost received by the formula:A/B x 25 (where A equals the lowest cost received, B equals offeror’s cost)

25% 0 - 25 points 18.35714 18.35714 18.35714 18.35714 18.35714 91.78570

TOTAL SCORE Total = 85 points 68.36 61.36 65.36 58.36 68.36 321.79

Vendor Name: EXP Studios

Center RFQ # 3140004204 Short List Evaluation Score Form

List of Evaluation Factors Weight of Factor (%) Points Range of Factor Cindy Jessica Lance Sarah Shane Points Awarded Technical Factors = 40 points max

Past experience on projects of similar scope 15% 0 - 15 points 11.00 9.00 8.00 10.00 11.00 49.00

Innovative use of technology and techniques 10% 0 - 10 points 5.00 7.00 5.00 5.00 7.00 29.00

Fabrication and installation 15% 0 - 15 points 13.00 10.00 9.00 15.00 11.00 58.00

Management Factors = 20 points max

Project Plan 10% 0 - 10 points 8.00 8.00 7.00 5.00 7.00 35.00

Project Team 10% 0 - 10 points 7.00 8.00 6.00 10.00 7.00 38.00

Cost = 25 points max

Cost: The maximum of 25 points will be assigned to the lowest cost received. All other proposal costs received will scored relative to the lowest cost received by the formula:A/B x 25 (where A equals the lowest cost received, B equals offeror’s cost)

25% 0 - 25 points 25.00000 25.00000 25.00000 25.00000 25.00000 125.00000

TOTAL SCORE Total = 85 points 69.00 67.00 60.00 70.00 68.00 334.00

Vendor Name: Formations Inc.

Center RFQ # 3140004204 Short List Evaluation Score Form

List of Evaluation Factors Weight of Factor (%) Points Range of Factor Cindy Jessica Lance Sarah Shane Points Awarded Technical Factors = 40 points max

Past experience on projects of similar scope 15% 0 - 15 points 12.00 10.00 11.00 5.00 13.00 51.00

Innovative use of technology and techniques 10% 0 - 10 points 7.00 5.00 8.00 5.00 8.00 33.00

Fabrication and installation 15% 0 - 15 points 13.00 11.00 11.00 15.00 14.00 64.00

Management Factors = 20 points max

Project Plan 10% 0 - 10 points 8.00 8.00 7.00 10.00 9.00 42.00

Project Team 10% 0 - 10 points 8.00 8.00 8.00 10.00 8.00 42.00

Cost = 25 points max

Cost: The maximum of 25 points will be assigned to the lowest cost received. All other proposal costs received will scored relative to the lowest cost received by the formula:A/B x 25 (where A equals the lowest cost received, B equals offeror’s cost)

25% 0 - 25 points 19.43697 19.43697 19.43697 19.43697 19.43697 97.18485

TOTAL SCORE Total = 85 points 67.44 61.44 64.44 64.44 71.44 329.18

Vendor Name: Hadley Exhibits, Inc.

Center RFQ # 3140004204 Short List Evaluation Score Form

List of Evaluation Factors Weight of Factor (%) Points Range of Factor Cindy Jessica Lance Sarah Shane Points Awarded Technical Factors = 40 points max

Past experience on projects of similar scope 15% 0 - 15 points 14.00 12.00 13.00 15.00 14.00 68.00

Innovative use of technology and techniques 10% 0 - 10 points 9.00 8.00 10.00 10.00 8.00 45.00

Fabrication and installation 15% 0 - 15 points 13.00 12.00 13.00 15.00 15.00 68.00

Management Factors = 20 points max

Project Plan 10% 0 - 10 points 8.00 8.00 8.00 10.00 8.00 42.00

Project Team 10% 0 - 10 points 8.00 8.00 9.00 10.00 8.00 43.00

Cost = 25 points max

Cost: The maximum of 25 points will be assigned to the lowest cost received. All other proposal costs received will scored relative to the lowest cost received by the formula:A/B x 25 (where A equals the lowest cost received, B equals offeror’s cost)

25% 0 - 25 points 16.76087 16.76087 16.76087 16.76087 16.76087 83.80435

TOTAL SCORE Total = 85 points 68.76 64.76 69.76 76.76 69.76 349.80

Vendor Name: Kubik Maltbie, Inc

Center RFQ # 3140004204 Short List Evaluation Score Form

List of Evaluation Factors Weight of Factor (%) Points Range of Factor Cindy Jessica Lance Sarah Shane Points Awarded Technical Factors = 40 points max

Past experience on projects of similar scope 15% 0 - 15 points 14.00 12.00 11.00 10.00 13.00 60.00

Innovative use of technology and techniques 10% 0 - 10 points 8.00 7.00 8.00 5.00 9.00 37.00

Fabrication and installation 15% 0 - 15 points 13.00 11.00 11.00 15.00 14.00 64.00

Management Factors = 20 points max

Project Plan 10% 0 - 10 points 8.00 7.00 7.00 5.00 9.00 36.00

Project Team 10% 0 - 10 points 9.00 8.00 6.00 10.00 8.00 41.00

Cost = 25 points max

Cost: The maximum of 25 points will be assigned to the lowest cost received. All other proposal costs received will scored relative to the lowest cost received by the formula:A/B x 25 (where A equals the lowest cost received, B equals offeror’s cost)

25% 0 - 25 points 16.52143 16.52143 16.52143 16.52143 16.52143 82.60715

TOTAL SCORE Total = 85 points 68.52 61.52 59.52 61.52 69.52 320.61

Vendor Name: NFUSION SERVICES INC

Center RFQ # 3140004204 Short List Evaluation Score Form

List of Evaluation Factors Weight of Factor (%) Points Range of Factor Cindy Jessica Lance Sarah Shane Points Awarded Technical Factors = 40 points max

Past experience on projects of similar scope 15% 0 - 15 points 6.00 8.00 13.00 5.00 13.00 45.00

Innovative use of technology and techniques 10% 0 - 10 points 8.00 6.00 10.00 5.00 7.00 36.00

Fabrication and installation 15% 0 - 15 points 12.00 11.00 13.00 10.00 14.00 60.00

Management Factors = 20 points max

Project Plan 10% 0 - 10 points 8.00 8.00 8.00 5.00 8.00 37.00

Project Team 10% 0 - 10 points 7.00 8.00 8.00 10.00 8.00 41.00

Cost = 25 points max

Cost: The maximum of 25 points will be assigned to the lowest cost received. All other proposal costs received will scored relative to the lowest cost received by the formula:A/B x 25 (where A equals the lowest cost received, B equals offeror’s cost)

25% 0 - 25 points 16.52143 16.52143 16.52143 16.52143 16.52143 82.60715

TOTAL SCORE Total = 85 points 57.52 57.52 68.52 51.52 66.52 301.61

Vendor Name: PGAV Destinations

Center RFQ # 3140004204 Short List Evaluation Score Form

List of Evaluation Factors Weight of Factor (%) Points Range of Factor Cindy Jessica Lance Sarah Shane Points Awarded Technical Factors = 40 points max

Past experience on projects of similar scope 15% 0 - 15 points 10.00 9.00 11.00 15.00 10.00 55.00

Innovative use of technology and techniques 10% 0 - 10 points 8.00 6.00 8.00 5.00 5.00 32.00

Fabrication and installation 15% 0 - 15 points 13.00 10.00 12.00 15.00 11.00 61.00

Management Factors = 20 points max

Project Plan 10% 0 - 10 points 8.00 6.00 8.00 10.00 7.00 39.00

Project Team 10% 0 - 10 points 8.00 6.00 8.00 10.00 7.00 39.00

Cost = 25 points max

Cost: The maximum of 25 points will be assigned to the lowest cost received. All other proposal costs received will scored relative to the lowest cost received by the formula:A/B x 25 (where A equals the lowest cost received, B equals offeror’s cost)

25% 0 - 25 points 16.52143 16.52143 16.52143 16.52143 16.52143 82.60715

TOTAL SCORE Total = 85 points 63.52 53.52 63.52 71.52 56.52 308.61

Vendor Name: Riggs Ward Design, L.C.

Center RFQ # 3140004204 Short List Evaluation Score Form

List of Evaluation Factors Weight of Factor (%) Points Range of Factor Cindy Jessica Lance Sarah Shane Points Awarded Technical Factors = 40 points max

Past experience on projects of similar scope 15% 0 - 15 points 12.00 10.00 11.00 5.00 11.00 49.00

Innovative use of technology and techniques 10% 0 - 10 points 9.00 8.00 8.00 5.00 9.00 39.00

Fabrication and installation 15% 0 - 15 points 12.00 12.00 11.00 15.00 15.00 65.00

Management Factors = 20 points max

Project Plan 10% 0 - 10 points 8.00 7.00 7.00 10.00 9.00 41.00

Project Team 10% 0 - 10 points 8.00 7.00 7.00 5.00 6.00 33.00

Cost = 25 points max

Cost: The maximum of 25 points will be assigned to the lowest cost received. All other proposal costs received will scored relative to the lowest cost received by the formula:A/B x 25 (where A equals the lowest cost received, B equals offeror’s cost)

25% 0 - 25 points 16.88075 16.88075 16.88075 16.88075 16.88075 84.40375

TOTAL SCORE Total = 85 points 65.88 60.88 60.88 56.88 66.88 311.40

Vendor Name: Roto Group, LLC

Center RFQ # 3140004204 Short List Evaluation Score Form

List of Evaluation Factors Weight of Factor (%) Points Range of Factor Cindy Jessica Lance Sarah Shane Points Awarded Technical Factors = 40 points max

Past experience on projects of similar scope 15% 0 - 15 points 11.00 10.00 11.00 5.00 11.00 48.00

Innovative use of technology and techniques 10% 0 - 10 points 8.00 7.00 7.00 5.00 5.00 32.00

Fabrication and installation 15% 0 - 15 points 13.00 10.00 10.00 15.00 10.00 58.00

Management Factors = 20 points max

Project Plan 10% 0 - 10 points 8.00 8.00 7.00 5.00 7.00 35.00

Project Team 10% 0 - 10 points 6.00 8.00 7.00 10.00 7.00 38.00

Cost = 25 points max

Cost: The maximum of 25 points will be assigned to the lowest cost received. All other proposal costs received will scored relative to the lowest cost received by the formula:A/B x 25 (where A equals the lowest cost received, B equals offeror’s cost)

25% 0 - 25 points 17.00735 17.00735 17.00735 17.00735 17.00735 85.03675

TOTAL SCORE Total = 85 points 63.01 60.01 59.01 57.01 57.01 296.04

Vendor Name: Solid Light, Inc.

Center RFQ # 3140004204 Short List Evaluation Score Form

List of Evaluation Factors Weight of Factor (%) Points Range of Factor Cindy Jessica Lance Sarah Shane Points Awarded Technical Factors = 40 points max

Past experience on projects of similar scope 15% 0 - 15 points 10.00 9.00 6.00 15.00 10.00 50.00

Innovative use of technology and techniques 10% 0 - 10 points 8.00 5.00 5.00 10.00 7.00 35.00

Fabrication and installation 15% 0 - 15 points 12.00 8.00 10.00 15.00 12.00 57.00

Management Factors = 20 points max

Project Plan 10% 0 - 10 points 7.00 7.00 7.00 10.00 7.00 38.00

Project Team 10% 0 - 10 points 7.00 8.00 6.00 10.00 7.00 38.00

Cost = 25 points max

Cost: The maximum of 25 points will be assigned to the lowest cost received. All other proposal costs received will scored relative to the lowest cost received by the formula:A/B x 25 (where A equals the lowest cost received, B equals offeror’s cost)

25% 0 - 25 points 19.93966 19.93966 19.93966 19.93966 19.93966 99.69830

TOTAL SCORE Total = 85 points 63.94 56.94 53.94 79.94 62.94 317.70

Vendor Name: Southern Custom Exhibits of Alabama

Center RFQ # 3140004204 Short List Evaluation Score Form

List of Evaluation Factors Weight of Factor (%) Points Range of Factor Cindy Jessica Lance Sarah Shane Points Awarded Technical Factors = 40 points max

Past experience on projects of similar scope 15% 0 - 15 points 14.00 12.00 11.00 10.00 15.00 62.00

Innovative use of technology and techniques 10% 0 - 10 points 9.00 8.00 8.00 5.00 9.00 39.00

Fabrication and installation 15% 0 - 15 points 14.00 12.00 11.00 10.00 15.00 62.00

Management Factors = 20 points max

Project Plan 10% 0 - 10 points 9.00 8.00 7.00 5.00 9.00 38.00

Project Team 10% 0 - 10 points 8.00 7.00 7.00 10.00 10.00 42.00

Cost = 25 points max

Cost: The maximum of 25 points will be assigned to the lowest cost received. All other proposal costs received will scored relative to the lowest cost received by the formula:A/B x 25 (where A equals the lowest cost received, B equals offeror’s cost)

25% 0 - 25 points 16.52223 16.52223 16.52223 16.52223 16.52223 82.61115

TOTAL SCORE Total = 85 points 70.52 63.52 60.52 56.52 74.52 325.61

Vendor Name: Split Rock Studios

Center RFQ # 3140004204 Short List Evaluation Score Form

List of Evaluation Factors Weight of Factor (%) Points Range of Factor Cindy Jessica Lance Sarah Shane Points Awarded Technical Factors = 40 points max

Past experience on projects of similar scope 15% 0 - 15 points 11.00 11.00 9.00 10.00 13.00 54.00

Innovative use of technology and techniques 10% 0 - 10 points 9.00 6.00 7.00 5.00 7.00 34.00

Fabrication and installation 15% 0 - 15 points 12.00 12.00 11.00 15.00 14.00 64.00

Management Factors = 20 points max

Project Plan 10% 0 - 10 points 8.00 8.00 7.00 10.00 9.00 42.00

Project Team 10% 0 - 10 points 8.00 7.00 7.00 10.00 9.00 41.00

Cost = 25 points max

Cost: The maximum of 25 points will be assigned to the lowest cost received. All other proposal costs received will scored relative to the lowest cost received by the formula:A/B x 25 (where A equals the lowest cost received, B equals offeror’s cost)

25% 0 - 25 points 18.03571 18.03571 18.03571 18.03571 18.03571 90.17855

TOTAL SCORE Total = 85 points 66.04 62.04 59.04 68.04 70.04 325.18

Vendor Name: Taylor Studios Inc.

Center RFQ # 3140004204 Short List Evaluation Score Form

List of Evaluation Factors Weight of Factor (%) Points Range of Factor Cindy Jessica Lance Sarah Shane Points Awarded Technical Factors = 40 points max

Past experience on projects of similar scope 15% 0 - 15 points 11.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 12.00 53.00

Innovative use of technology and techniques 10% 0 - 10 points 9.00 7.00 8.00 5.00 7.00 36.00

Fabrication and installation 15% 0 - 15 points 11.00 10.00 11.00 15.00 11.00 58.00

Management Factors = 20 points max

Project Plan 10% 0 - 10 points 8.00 7.00 7.00 10.00 8.00 40.00

Project Team 10% 0 - 10 points 8.00 7.00 7.00 5.00 8.00 35.00

Cost = 25 points max

Cost: The maximum of 25 points will be assigned to the lowest cost received. All other proposal costs received will scored relative to the lowest cost received by the formula:A/B x 25 (where A equals the lowest cost received, B equals offeror’s cost)

25% 0 - 25 points 20.65179 20.65179 20.65179 20.65179 20.65179 103.25895

TOTAL SCORE Total = 85 points 67.65 61.65 63.65 65.65 66.65 325.26

Vendor Name: Xibitz, Inc.

Vendor Cumulative Score Rank Kubik Maltbie, Inc 349.80 1 Creo Industrial Arts LLC 337.38 2 Formations Inc. 334.00 3 Hadley Exhibits, Inc. 329.18 4 Split Rock Studios 325.61 5 Xibitz, Inc. 325.26 6 Taylor Studios Inc. 325.18 7 1220 Exhibits, Inc. 323.19 8 EXP Studios 321.79 9

NFUSION SERVICES INC 320.61 10

Southern Custom Exhibits of Alabama 317.70 11

COLOR-AD, INC. 313.96 12

Roto Group, LLC 311.40 13 BRC Imagination Arts, LLC 308.67 14 Riggs Ward Design, L.C. 308.61 15 Exhibit Concepts Inc. 304.61 16 PGAV Destinations 301.61 17 Solid Light, Inc. 296.04 18 Chicago Scenic Studios, Inc. 280.69 19 Eisterhold Associates, Inc. 273.14 20

1220 Exhibits
BRC
Chicago Scenic
Color-Ad
Creo
Eisterhold
Exhibit Concepts
EXP Studios
Formations
Hadley
KM
nFusion
PGAV
Riggs Ward
Roto
Solid Light
SCE
Split Rock
Taylor
Xibitz
Summary

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .