NTHC EXHIBIT INTERVIEW PHASE EVALUATION CUMULATIVE SCORESHEET.pdf
PDF 101 KB Posted
- Attached to
- 1475-25-R-RFQF-00006
- Solicitation number
- 3140004204
- Issued by
- Adams County, Mississippi
About this file
The document is a Short List Evaluation Scoresheet for the Natchez Tribal History Center (NTHC) Exhibit Design/Build project, issued by the Mississippi Department of Archives and History (MDAH) with reference number RFQ # 3140004204. The procurement evaluates three vendors - Creo Industrial Arts LLC, Formations Inc., and Kubik Maltbie, Inc. - for an exhibit design and installation project involving comprehensive research, design, fabrication, and installation of exhibits across 4,420 square feet of exhibition space. The evaluation process utilized a 100-point scoring system with weights assigned to technical factors (40 points), cost (25 points), management factors (20 points), and an interview phase (15 points).
The final cumulative scores ranked Creo Industrial Arts LLC first with 406.38 points, Formations Inc. second with 402.00 points, and Kubik Maltbie, Inc. third with 382.80 points. The scoring considered factors such as past project experience, innovative technology use, fabrication and installation capabilities, project planning, team composition, cultural sensitivity, collaboration characteristics, and unique design approaches. Each evaluator (Cindy, Jessica, Lance, Sarah, and Shane) independently scored the vendors across these categories, with the scores then aggregated to determine the overall rankings. The project appears to be funded with a $3.5 million budget and is targeted for completion by December 31, 2027, with a planned exhibit opening in 2027.
View the file
Other files
Show all 42
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
NTHC Exhibit Interview Phase Evaluation Cumulative Scoresheet
Exhibit Design/Build Natchez Tribal History Center RFQ # 3140004204 Short List Evaluation Score Form
List of Evaluation Factors Weight of Factor (%) Points Range of Factor Cindy Jessica Lance Sarah Shane Points Awarded Technical Factors = 40 points max
Past experience on projects of similar scope 15% 0 - 15 points 14.00 13.00 11.00 10.00 13.00 61.00
Innovative use of technology and techniques
10% 0 - 10 points 8.00 8.00 7.00 5.00 7.00 35.00
Fabrication and installation 15% 0 - 15 points 13.00 9.00 9.00 15.00 15.00 61.00
Management Factors = 20 points max
Project Plan 10% 0 - 10 points 8.00 7.00 7.00 10.00 10.00 42.00
Project Team 10% 0 - 10 points 8.00 7.00 7.00 10.00 10.00 42.00
Cost = 25 points max
Cost: The maximum of 25 points will be assigned to the lowest cost received. All other proposal costs received will scored relative to the lowest cost received by the formula:A/B x 25 (where A equals the lowest cost received, B equals offeror’s cost)
25% 0 - 25 points 19.27500 19.27500 19.27500 19.27500 19.27500 96.37500
Cultural sensitivity 5% 0 - 5 points 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 4.00 24.00
Characteristics of collaboration 5% 0 - 5 points 5.00 4.00 4.00 5.00 5.00 23.00
Uniqueness of the firm's design approach 5% 0 - 5 points 5.00 4.00 5.00 5.00 3.00 22.00
TOTAL SCORE Total = 100 points 85.28 76.28 74.28 84.28 86.28 406.38
Vendor Name: Creo Industrial Arts LLC
Interview = 15 points max
Center RFQ # 3140004204 Short List Evaluation Score Form
List of Evaluation Factors Weight of Factor (%) Points Range of Factor Cindy Jessica Lance Sarah Shane Points Awarded Technical Factors = 40 points max
Past experience on projects of similar scope 15% 0 - 15 points 11.00 9.00 8.00 10.00 11.00 49.00
Innovative use of technology and techniques 10% 0 - 10 points 5.00 7.00 5.00 5.00 7.00 29.00
Fabrication and installation 15% 0 - 15 points 13.00 10.00 9.00 15.00 11.00 58.00
Management Factors = 20 points max
Project Plan 10% 0 - 10 points 8.00 8.00 7.00 5.00 7.00 35.00
Project Team 10% 0 - 10 points 7.00 8.00 6.00 10.00 7.00 38.00
Cost = 25 points max
Cost: The maximum of 25 points will be assigned to the lowest cost received. All other proposal costs received will scored relative to the lowest cost received by the formula:A/B x 25 (where A equals the lowest cost received, B equals offeror’s cost)
25% 0 - 25 points 25.00000 25.00000 25.00000 25.00000 25.00000 125.00000
Cultural sensitivity 5% 0 - 5 points 4.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 4.00 23.00
Characteristics of collaboration 5% 0 - 5 points 4.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 24.00
Uniqueness of the firm's design approach 5% 0 - 5 points 4.00 4.00 4.00 5.00 4.00 21.00
TOTAL SCORE Total = 85 points 81.00 81.00 74.00 85.00 81.00 402.00
Vendor Name: Formations Inc.
Center RFQ # 3140004204 Short List Evaluation Score Form
List of Evaluation Factors Weight of Factor (%) Points Range of Factor Cindy Jessica Lance Sarah Shane Points Awarded Technical Factors = 40 points max
Past experience on projects of similar scope 15% 0 - 15 points 14.00 12.00 13.00 15.00 14.00 68.00
Innovative use of technology and techniques 10% 0 - 10 points 9.00 8.00 10.00 10.00 8.00 45.00
Fabrication and installation 15% 0 - 15 points 13.00 12.00 13.00 15.00 15.00 68.00
Management Factors = 20 points max
Project Plan 10% 0 - 10 points 8.00 8.00 8.00 10.00 8.00 42.00
Project Team 10% 0 - 10 points 8.00 8.00 9.00 10.00 8.00 43.00
Cost = 25 points max
Cost: The maximum of 25 points will be assigned to the lowest cost received. All other proposal costs received will scored relative to the lowest cost received by the formula:A/B x 25 (where A equals the lowest cost received, B equals offeror’s cost)
25% 0 - 25 points 16.76087 16.76087 16.76087 16.76087 16.76087 83.80435
Cultural sensitivity 5% 0 - 5 points 3.00 3.00 4.00 0.00 3.00 13.00
Characteristics of collaboration 5% 0 - 5 points 1.00 2.00 3.00 0.00 2.00 8.00
Uniqueness of the firm's design approach 5% 0 - 5 points 3.00 3.00 3.00 0.00 3.00 12.00
TOTAL SCORE Total = 85 points 75.76 72.76 79.76 76.76 77.76 382.80
Vendor Name: Kubik Maltbie, Inc
Vendor Cumulative Score Rank Creo Industrial Arts LLC 406.38 1 Formations Inc. 402.00 2 Kubik Maltbie, Inc 382.80 3
| Creo |
| Formations |
| KM |
| Summary |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .