N6945021R0056-0002.pdf

NAVFAC ENGINEERING SYSTEMS COMMAND SE

PWD PANAMA CITY

101 VERNON AVE, BLDG 126

NSA PANAMA CITY

PANAMA CITY BEACH FL 32407-7018

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

N6945021R0056, Panama City BOS

See BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE on page 2.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 14

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 07-May-2021

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street , County, State and Zip Code) X N6945021R0056

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

28-Apr-2021

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

07-May-2021

CODE

NAVFAC ENGINEERING SYSTEMS COMMAND SE

FSC-BOS

BUILDING 903, PO BOX 30

JACKSONVILLE FL 32212-0030

N69450 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE N69450

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N6945021R0056

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

The following have been added by full text:

AMENDMENT 0002

The purpose of this amendment is to make the following changes:

1) Section C – The Section C attachment has been updated. Changes within the attachment are shown in red strikethrough for deletions and blue underline for additions. The revised Section C is provided via attachment under file name N6945021R0056 Section C_0002.pdf. A summary of the revised spec items is as follows:

a. Annex 0200000 – Management and Administration The Table of Contents has been updated – Page 6 of 170

b. Sub-annex 1502000 – Facility Investment The Table of Contents has been updated – Page 53 of 170 Spec Item 3 Recurring Work – Page 59 of 170 Spec Item 3.1 Service Orders – Page 60 of 170 Spec Item 3.1.1 Emergency Service Orders – Pages 62-63 of 170 Spec Item 3.1.2 Urgent Service Orders – Page 63 of 170 Spec Item 3.1.3 Routine Service Orders – Pages 63-64 of 170 Spec Item 3.2.7 Switchgear – Page 68 of 170 Spec Item 3.2.8 Compressed Air Systems – Page 68 of 170 (Renumbered only) Spec Item 3.2.9 Auxiliary Generators – Page 68 of 170 (Renumbered only) Spec Item 3.2.10 POL System Facilities and Distribution Systems – Page 69 of 170 (Renumbered only) Spec Item 3.2.11 Swimming Pool Equipment – Page 69 of 170 (Renumbered only) Spec Item 3.3 Integrated Maintenance Program (IMP) – Page 71 of 170 Spec Item 3.3.1 Fire Prorection Systems – Page 72 of 170 Spec Item 3.3.2 Vertical Transportation Equipment (VTE) – Page 72 of 170 Spec Item 3.4.1 Boilers and UPVs– Page 74 of 170 Spec Item 3.4.2 Backflow Prevention Devices – Page 76 of 170 Spec Item 3.4.3 Vertical Transportation Equipment (VTE) – Page 76 of 170 Spec Item 3.4.4 Pol System Facilities and Distribution Systems – Pages 77-78 of 170 Spec Item 3.5.1 Grease Traps – Page 79 of 170 Spec Item 3.5.2 Exhaust Hoods and Ducts – Page 79 of 170 Spec Item 3.5.3 Oil Water Separators and Holding Tanks – Pages 79-80 of 170 Spec Item 3.5.4 HVAC Water Testing and Treatment Services – Page 80 of 170 Spec Item 3.5.5 Boiler Water Testing and Treatment Services – Page 81 of 170 Spec Item 3.5.6 Roof Drainage Systems – Page 81 of 170 Spec Item 3.5.7 Lift Stations – Page 82 of 170

c. Sub-annex 1503010 – Custodial Spec Item 3 Recurring Work – Page 87 of 170 Spec Item 3.1.1.5 High Area Cleaning – Page 90 of 170 (Renumbered only) Spec Item 3.1.1.6 Interior Window Cleaning – Page 90 of 170 (Renumbered only) Spec Item 3.1.1.7 Exterior Window Cleaning – Page 90 of 170 (Renumbered only) Spec Item 3.1.1.8 Window Blinds Cleaning – Page 91 of 170 (Renumbered only)

Spec Item 3.1.1.9 Entrance Cleaning – Page 91 of 170 (Renumbered only) Spec Item 3.1.1.10 Interior Glass Surfaces Cleaning – Page 91 of 170 (Renumbered only) Spec Item 3.1.1.11 Drinking Fountains Cleaning – Page 92 of 170 (Renumbered only) Spec Item 3.2 Custodial Service Orders – Pages 97-98 of 170 Spec Item 4 Non-Recurring Work – Page 99 of 170

d. Sub-annex 1503020 – Pest Control The Table of Contents has been updated – Page 100 of 170 Spec Item 2.3.5 Pesticides – Page 103 of 170 Spec Item 3.1.2 Public Health Pest Control – Page 107 of 170 (Renumbered only) Spec Item 3.1.3 Pest Vertebrate Control – Page 108 of 170 (Renumbered only)

Spec Item 3.2 Pest Control Service Orders – Pages 108-109 of 170

e. Sub-annex 1503030 – Integrated Solid Waste Management Spec Item 3 FFP Work – Page 115 of 170

f. Sub-annex 1503040 – Other (Swimming Pools) Spec Item 3.1.4 Off-Season Maintenance – Page 124 of 170

g. Sub-annex 1503050 – Grounds Maintenance and Landscaping Spec Item 2.3.1.9 On-Site Materials – Page 130 of 170 Spec Item 2.3.1.10 Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) – Page 131 of 170 Spec Item 3.1.3 Shrub and Hedge Maintenance – Page 136 of 170 Spec Item 3.4 Grounds Maintenance Service Orders – Page 142 of 170 Spec Item 4 Non-Recurring Work – Page 143 of 170

h. Sub-annex 1503060 – Pavement Clearance Spec Item 3 Recurring Work – Page 147 of 170

2) Section F – The Section F attachment has been updated. Changes within the attachment are shown in red strikethrough for deletions and blue underline for additions. The revised Section F is provided via attachment under file name N6945021R0056 Section F_0002.pdf. A summary of the revised spec items is

a. Sub-annex 1502000 – Facility Investment Spec Item 3.2.9 Auto-Run Report – Page 8 of 18 (Renumbered only)

3) Section J – The Section J attachment has been updated. Changes within the attachment are shown in red strikethrough for deletions and blue underline for additions. The revised Section J is provided via attachment under file name N6945021R0056 Section J_0002.pdf. A summary of the revised spec items is

a. Annex 0200000 – Management and Administration Attachment J-0200000-11 NAVFAC MAXIMO Data Reporting – Page 28 of 192

b. Sub-annex 1501000 – Facility Management Attachment J-1501000-02 Locksmith Work Standards – Page 42 of 192 (Renumbered only) Attachment J-1501000-04 Facility Inventory – Pages 46, 49, 52-63 of 192

c. Sub-annex 1502000 – Facility Investment Section J Documents, Exhibits, and Other Attachments Table of Contents – Page 68 of 192

Attachment J-1502000-16 – Page 87 of 192 (Deleted) Attachment J-1502000-16 Fire Protection Inventory – Page 88 of 192 (Renumbered only) Attachment J-1502000-17 VTE Inventory – Page 89 of 192 (Renumbered only)

Attachment J-1502000-18 Backflow Prevention Devices and Date of Last Inspection – Page 90 of 192 (Renumbered only) Attachment J-1502000-19 POL Monthly Summary Report – Page 91 of 192 (Renumbered only) Attachment J-1502000-20 Grease Trap Inventory – Page 92 of 192 (Renumbered only) Attachment J-1502000-21 Exhaust Hood and Duct Inventory – Page 93 of 192 (Renumbered only) Attachment J-1502000-22 Oil/Water Separator Holding Tank Map – Page 94 of 192 (Renumbered only) Attachment J-1502000-23 Oil/Water Separator Maintenance Instructions – Page 95 of 192 (Renumbered only) Attachment J-1502000-24 HVAC Water Testing and Treatment Services Inventory – Page 98 of 192 (Renumbered only) Attachment J-1502000-26 Boiler Water Testing and Treatment Services Inventory – Page 99 of 192 (Deleted) Attachment J-1502000-25 Roof Drainage Systems – Page 100 of 192 (Renumbered only) Attachment J-1502000-26 Lift Stations – Page 101 of 192 (Renumbered only)

d. Annex 1800000 – Environmental Attachment J-1800000-03 Used Oil and Regulated Waste Collection Locations – Page 186 of 192 Attachment J-1800000-08 Historical Environmental Service Orders – Page 192 of 192 (Renumbered only)

4) Section J – The Table of Contents has been revised as follows (changes are shown in red font):

a. The ELINs spreadsheet has been updated and is provided as file name J-0200000-17 ELINs_0002.xlsx.

b. Attachment J-1502000-03 Facility Investment has been updated and is provided as file name J- 1502000-03 Facility Investment_0002.xlsx.

c. Attachment J-1502000-23 Oil Water Separators has been renumbered and is provided as file name J-1502000-22 Oil Water Separators_0002.pdf.

d. Attachment J-1502050-05 Palm Tree Site Map has been renumbered and is provided as file name J-1503050-05 Palm Tree Site Map_0002.pdf.

5) Section M – Section M.3 Evaluation Factors, 3. Basis of Evaluation and Submittal Requirements for Each

Factor, (b) Non-cost/price Factors, has been revised as follows (changes are shown in red font):

a. The relevant project completion timeframe is increased to ten (10) years.

b. (1) Factor 1 Corporate Experience:

i. (i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

1. 1503010 – Custodial and 1503050 – Grounds Maintenance and Landscaping is removed from the aggregate relevant experience.

ii. (ii) Basis of Evaluation:

1. 1503010 – Custodial and 1503050 – Grounds Maintenance and Landscaping is removed from the aggregate relevant experience.

2. Relevant experience that may be evaluated more favorably is revised to only include 1503010 – Custodial, 1503030 – Integrated Solid Waste Management (ISWM), and/or Grounds Maintenance and Landscaping.

The proposal due date and time remains 2:00 PM EDT, Friday, 28 May 2021.

All other terms and conditions remain unchanged.

SECTION C - DESCRIPTIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS

The following have been modified:

PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT

This is a performance-based contract which incorporates performance-based specifications.

The files for SECTION C are provided as the following attachment posted on the Beta SAM website at https://beta.sam.gov.

N6945021R00056 Section C_0002.pdf

SECTION F - DELIVERIES OR PERFORMANCE

F.5 DELIVERABLES

The files for SECTION F are provided as the following attachment posted on the Beta SAM website at https://beta.sam.gov/.

N6945021R0056 Section F_0002.pdf

NOTE: Deliverables requirements under the contract should be submitted to the Government via Electronic format.

The file document(s) format shall be compatible with the most recent Government installed Microsoft Office version (currently 2016) and an unprotected version. The documents may be submitted via email as 'attachment(s)', file size permitting. Else, the deliverables should be submitted on a CD-ROM.

SECTION J - LIST OF DOCUMENTS, EXHIBITS AND OTHER ATTACHMENTS

SECTION J

Section J - Table of Contents list the Documents, Exhibits and Other Attachments for this Section are posted on the Beta SAM website at https://beta.sam.gov/.

The ACQUISITION documents are posted as individual file names as indicated in the table. The TECHNICAL documents are posted as individual file names as indicated in the table or “all-inclusive” under filename:

N6945021R0056 Section J_0002.pdf.

Section J – Table of Contents

Section J – Table of Contents

JL-1

JL-1 Labor Hours. Provided as file name JL1 N6945021R0056.

JL-2 Government Pre-award Inquiry Form (GPIF). Provided as file name JL2 N6945021R0056 GPIF.xlsx.

JL-3 SECNAV 5512/1 Form for base access. Provided as file name JL3 N6945021R0056

SECNAV5512_0001.pdf.

JL-4 Base Access During COVID Lockdown. Provided as file name JL4 N6945021R0056 NSAPC Base

Access During COVID Lockdown.pdf.

JL-5 CUSFF/NAVNORTH COVID-19 Screening Questionnaire. Provided as file name JL5

N6945021R0056 COVID-19 Screening Questionnaire.pdf._ JL-6 COVID-19 Unrestrcited Travel Tracker. Provided as file name JL6 N6945021R0056 COVID-19

Unrestricted Travel Tracker.

JL-7 Site Visit Itinerary. Provided as file name JL7 N6945021R0056 Site Visit Itinerary.pdf.

JM-1 Corporate Experience Project Data Sheet. Provided as file name JM1 N6945021R0056 Corporate

Experience Project Data Sheet.doc JM-2 Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ). Provided as file name JM2 N6945021R0056 PPQ.doc J-0200000-02 Wage Determinations are provided as follows:

J-0200000-02-01

J-0200000-02-02

1) Collective Bargaining Agreements (CBA). Provided as file names:

N6945021R0056_CWA_CBA.pdf. Between Government Contracting Resources, Inc. and Communications Workers of America, AFL-CIO Local Lodge No. 449, effective June 28, 2020 through June 25, 2022.

N6945021R0056_IAM_CBA.pdf. Between The Ginn Group, Inc. and International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, AFL-CIO, effective July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2022.

Applies to all service employees who will perform identifiable bargaining unit work/functions. This WD requirement will apply under section 4(c) of the Service Contract Labor Standards statute regardless of whether workers are employed by the prime contractor or a subcontractor under this procurement. Service employees are defined in FAR 22.1001.

J-0200000-02-03 2) Service Contract Act Wage Determinations. Provided as file names:

N6945021R0056_Bay_WD15-4559(Rev.15).pdf; and N6945021R0056_Leon_WD15-4569(Rev.12).pdf.

Applies to all other service employees (those not performing bargaining unit work/functions) performing work on the contract. Service employees are defined in FAR 22.1001.

J-0200000-02-04 3) Construction Wage Rate Requirements. Provided as file names:

N6945021R0056_Bay_Bldg_FL20210005.pdf;

N6945021R0056_Leon_Hvy_FL20210105.pdf;

N6945021R0056_Leon_Bldg_FL20210233.pdf; and N6945021R0056_Leon_Hvy_FL20210121.pdf.

Applies to all construction employees performing work on the contract.

J-0200000-04 Invoice Form. Provided as file name J-0200000-04 Invoice Form.xls J-0200000-05-08 Contractor Significant Incident Report (CSIR). Provided as file name J-0200000-05-08 CSIR.pdf

J-0200000-06-01 Commander, Navy Region Southeast Instruction 4101.1. Provided as file name J-0200000-06-01 CNRSEINST 41011.pdf.

J-0200000-06-02 Commander, Navy Region Southeast Instruction 4101.1B. Provided as file name J-0200000-06-02 CNRSEINST 41011.pdf.

J-0200000-07 Laydown Area Map. Provided as file name J-0200000-07 Laydown Area Map.pdf

J-0200000-13 NSA PC Instruction 5090.1D. Provided as file name J-0200000-13 NSAPCFLINST 5090.1D Hazardous Waste Management Plan.pdf.

J-0200000-14 NSA PC Final Hazardous Waste Contingency Plan and Quick Reference Guide. Provided as file name J-0200000-14 NSAPC HWCP.pdf.

J-0200000-15 Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan. Provided as file name J-0200000-15 Panama City SPCC.pdf.

J-0200000-17 Exhibit Line Item Number (ELIN) spreadsheet. Provided as file name J-0200000- 17 ELINs_0002.xlsx.

J-1501000-07 Meter Group Descriptions and Direct Condition Rating Guidance. Provided as file name J-1501000- 07 METER GROUP DESCRIPTIONS.xlsx.

J-1502000-03 Historical Service Order Workload. Provided as file J-1502000-03 Section J 1502000 Facility Investment_0002.xlsx.

J-1502000-23 J-1502000-22

Oil Water Separators. Provided as file name J-1502000-22 Oil Water Separators_0002.pdf.

J-1502050-05 J-1503050-05

Palm Tree Site Map. Provided as file name J-1503050-05 Palm Tree Site Map_0002.pdf.

J-1503010-06 Custodial Inventory. Provided as file name J-1503010-06 Custodial Inventory.xlsx.

J-1503030-05 Maps and Locations. Provided as file name J-1503030-05 Waste Container Map.pdf.

J-1503050-02 Grounds Maintenance Site Map. Provided as file name J-1503050-02 Grounds Maintenance Site Map.pdf.

J-1503060-04 Pavement Clearance Map. Provided as file name J-1503060-04 Pavement Clearance Map.pdf.

J-1800000-03 Used Oil and Regulated Waste Collection Locations. Provided as file name J-1800000-03 SCA Site Map.pdf.

J-1800000-07 Outfall Location Site Map. Provided as file name J-1800000-07 Outfall and Retention Pond Site Map.pdf.

SECTION M - EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

M.3 EVALUATION FACTORS

1. The solicitation requires the evaluation of price and the following non-cost/price factors:

Factor 1 – Corporate Experience Factor 2 –Technical Approach Factor 3 – Safety Factor 4 – Past Performance

2. The relative order of importance of the non-cost/price evaluation factors is the technical factors (Factors 1, 2, and 3) are of equal importance to each other and, when combined are equal in importance to the past performance evaluation/performance confidence assessment factor (Factor 4). When the proposal is evaluated as a whole, the technical factors and past performance/performance confidence assessment factor combined (i.e., the non-cost/price evaluation factors) are approximately equal to price.

3. Basis of Evaluation and Submittal Requirements for Each Factor.

(a) Price:

(1) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

(i) Provide a completed Section B of the solicitation.

(ii) Provide a completed Section J Exhibit Line Item Number (ELIN) Pricing Attachment. There are multiple worksheets within this file that require completion. Proposed prices for Spec Item 3 Labor Cost, Spec Item 3 Material, Spec Item 3 Equipment, Spec Items 1 and 2 On-Site Cost, Off-Site Cost (inclusive of ISWM Disposal Fees for Sub-annex 1503030), and Profit/Fee shall be provided in the same level of detail for all requirements, whether the work is proposed to be accomplished as the prime contractor, subcontractor, or by other means.

(iii) Submit pricing data (Section B and Section J ELINs) in hard copy and in electronic

(Microsoft Office Version 2016 compatible) format on CD-ROM. Offerors shall utilize the pricing attachments provided in Section J to submit the ELIN pricing data in the format provided. Because the pricing evaluation will concentrate on the electronic files submitted, in the event of a discrepancy between the proposal hard copies and the proposal electronic copies, the proposal electronic copies will take precedence.

(iv) Provide a narrative (limited to 15 pages; double-sided printing is allowed; however, each side will be counted as one page) of all costs your firm classifies as direct and indirect and describe the basis and rationale for the proposed amounts. Explain how these costs are allocated to each of the cost elements identified in the Section J ELIN Attachment (Spec Item 3 Labor, Spec Item 3 Material, Spec Item 3 Equipment, Off-Site Cost, etc.).

(2) Basis of Evaluation:

(i) The Government will evaluate price based on proposed ELIN Pricing at the functional

(Annex/Sub-annex, Spec Item, etc.) and elemental (Spec Item 3 Labor, Spec Item 3 Material, Spec Item 3 Equipment, etc.) level, and the total proposed price. Total price consists of the basic requirements and all option items (see Section B of the solicitation). The Government intends to evaluate all options and has included the provision FAR 52.217-5, Evaluation of Options (JUL 1990) in Section M of the solicitation. In accordance with FAR 52.217-5, evaluation of options will not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s). Analysis will be performed by one or more of the following techniques to ensure a fair and reasonable price:

(a) Comparison of proposed prices received in response to the RFP.

(b) Comparison of proposed prices with the IGE.

(c) Comparison of proposed prices with available historical information.

(d) Comparison of market survey results.

(e) And/or any other methodology deemed appropriate by the Contracting Officer and consistent with

FAR 15.404-1.

(ii) Identification of unbalanced pricing including allocation to the ELIN/Sub-ELIN unit prices.

Unbalanced pricing exists when, despite an acceptable total evaluated price, the price of one or more prices at the functional (Annex/Sub-annex, Spec Item, etc.) level, ELIN/sub-ELIN unit prices, or contract line items is significantly overstated or understated. An offer may be rejected if the proposed price is materially unbalanced between line items or sub-line items within a pricing period, or between line items or sub-line items for the basic requirement and any option period.

(iii) Any suspected issues or concerns in the price proposal, including any inconsistent pricing submitted within Section B and the Section J ELIN attachment.

(iv) Any inconsistency, whether real or apparent, between proposed performance and price must be clearly explained in the price proposal. For example, if unique and innovative approaches are the basis for an apparently unbalanced/inconsistently priced proposal, the nature of these approaches and their impact on price must be completely documented. It is the responsibility of the offeror to provide all required documentation.

(v) The analysis may consider whether prices are realistic in relation to the work to be performed, reflect a clear understanding of the requirements, and are consistent with other portions of the offeror’s proposal. A price that is found either unreasonably high or unrealistically low in relation to the proposed work may be indicative of an inherent lack of understanding of the solicitation requirements and may result in the overall proposal not being considered for award.

(b) Non-cost/price Factors:

The offeror’s response to factors that require the submission of Experience Narrative and Past Performance shall be based on the following relevancy definition:

RELEVANT PROJECT: Relevant projects include those that demonstrate the capability to perform services similar in size, scope, and complexity to those described in the performance work statement/specifications of the RFP with a contract value of $1,000,000.00 per year or greater and shall be: 1) ongoing with at least 12 months of contract performance completed by the date of receipt of proposals, or 2) shall be completed within the last ten (10) years. For purposes of this evaluation, a relevant project is further defined as Base Operations Support (BOS) services (or equivalent) that encompass at least two of the following:

a. 1502000 – Facility Investment similar to the requirements of the RFP (at minimum, Service Orders and HVAC Systems);

b. 1503010 – Custodial similar to the requirements of the RFP; and

c. 1503050 – Grounds Maintenance and Landscaping similar to the requirements of the RFP.

Complexity will be determined based on the projects’ contract type, facilities maintained (size, quantity and type), systems maintained (quantities and capacities), program structure (combination of Preventive Maintenance Program, service orders, other recurring services) and grounds maintained (size, quantity and type).

(1) Factor 1 Corporate Experience:

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

The offeror shall provide a minimum of two (2) to a maximum of five (5) examples of relevant projects to be documented only on Attachment JM-1, Corporate Experience Project Data Sheet. Offerors shall not submit any information under Factor 1 unless submitted on Attachment JM-1. The offeror shall clearly demonstrate recent, relevant experience as a prime contractor on projects similar in size, scope, and complexity to the requirements described in the Performance Work Statement (PWS) of the RFP.

The offeror’s submitted projects must aggregately demonstrate experience self-performing or managing 1502000 – Facility Investment similar to the requirements of the RFP (at minimum, Service Orders and HVAC Systems).

If the offeror is a Joint Venture (JV), recent/relevant experience should be submitted for projects completed by the JV entity. If the JV does not have such experience, recent/relevant experience shall be submitted for each JV partner (except for offerors covered by Mentor-Protégé Agreements approved by the Small Business Administration). JV offerors are still limited to a maximum total of five (5) recent and relevant projects.

If a project was performed by a JV and not all members from the prior JV are proposing on this solicitation, the offeror shall clearly demonstrate what portion of the work on the submitted project was performed by the JV partner proposing on this solicitation.

An offeror may rely on the prime contractor experience of corporate affiliates (e.g., subsidiaries, sister companies, predecessor companies, and parent companies) to demonstrate experience, provided the offeror submits the following:

a. A one-page narrative clearly demonstrating that the corporate affiliates will have meaningful participation in the project by identifying the personnel or resources from the corporate affiliates that will be dedicated to the project;

b. An organization chart that demonstrates the corporate relationship of the affiliates; and,

c. Teaming agreement/Letter of commitment.

For each project, the offeror shall complete Attachment JM-1 Corporate Experience Project Data Sheet. All information shall be provided as requested on the form. Attachment JM-1 may be expanded and is not limited to the two (2) pages provided with the solicitation.

(ii) Basis of Evaluation:

The assessment of the offeror’s recent and relevant experience will be used as a means of evaluating the capability of the offeror to successfully meet the requirements of this solicitation. The Government will consider the depth and breadth of the relevant experience, focusing on performance of technical specifications to be performed under this contract, to evaluate the level of risk of unsuccessful performance. The Government will review only five (5) projects. Any projects submitted in excess of the five (5) project limit will not be considered. Projects must be submitted on the required Attachment JM-1.

Projects completed by the offeror or its corporate affiliates (e.g., subsidiaries, sister companies, predecessor companies, and parent companies) in any capacity other than as prime contractor will be considered not relevant.

Projects performed by the offeror as the prime contractor may be considered more favorably than those performed by affiliates/subsidiaries/parent/LLC/LTD/member companies.

Projects completed by a proposed subcontractor will be considered not relevant.

Projects submitted by JVs where the JV firms performed together may be evaluated more favorably than projects submitted in which the JV firms did not perform together.

With the exception of offerors covered by Mentor-Protégé Agreements approved by the Small Business Administration, if the offeror is a JV, each member of the JV must demonstrate prime contractor experience on at least one relevant project. If each member of the JV does not have at least one relevant experience project, then the offeror will be considered unacceptable.

For multiple award contracts (MACs) or indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity (IDIQ) contracts, the specific relevant single task order proposed, not the entire MAC or IDIQ contract, will be considered a project for evaluation purposes.

Offerors who fail to aggregately demonstrate relevant experience in 1502000 – Facility Investment similar to the requirements of the RFP (at minimum, Service Orders and HVAC Systems) will be considered unacceptable.

Offerors who demonstrate relevant experience in Sub-Annexes 1503010 – Custodial, 1503030 Integrated Solid Waste Management (ISWM), and/or 1503050 – Grounds Maintenance and Landscaping, may be evaluated more favorably.

(2) Factor 2, Technical Approach

Provide labor hours by submitting a completed Attachment JL-1 Labor Hours worksheet (MS Excel, Microsoft Office Version 2016 compatible) for the total effort to include the prime contractor, affiliates/subsidiaries/parent/LLC/LTD member companies, and all subcontractors for the base period of performance. Provide the number of labor hours proposed for performing each technical specification item as provided on Attachment JL-1.

Provide a narrative of your rationale for the Basis of Estimate (BOE) according to the annual total labor hours for each technical specification to include individual labor classifications. Explain the methodology used to develop the number of labor hours for the base period and state the estimate data source(s) (such as RS Means Facilities Maintenance & Repair Cost Data, CBRE Facilities Maintenance & Repair Cost Data, etc.).

Your narrative shall include how the proposed approach and labor hours will effectively achieve each performance objective and associated performance standard(s) for each technical specification while coordinating, managing, and supervising workforce personnel across all technical specifications simultaneously. Additionally, the narrative shall describe the methodology for service orders (all types) and demonstrate an understanding of all limits of liability identified in each respective spec item. Describe how you will staff the organization including the relationship between overall management (corporate and on-site), administration, affiliates/subsidiaries/parent /LLC/LTD member companies, and subcontractors to include Spec Items 1, 2, 3, and 4 personnel.

The Government will evaluate how well the offeror’s approach demonstrates adequate labor hours on an overall level, as well as for each technical specification (and each specification item) supported by a reasonable BOE, and demonstrates a reasonable understanding of the requirements and labor quantities and skills needed to successfully perform. Offerors who fail to provide a completed Attachment JL-1 Labor Hours worksheet for the total effort to include the prime contractor, affiliates/subsidiaries/parent/LLC/LTD member companies, and all subcontractors for the base period will be considered unacceptable. Offerors who propose labor hours without a logical explanation of how they will be able to perform at the proposed staffing level may be evaluated less favorably or considered unacceptable.

Offerors who propose an approach which does not demonstrate a reasonable likelihood the work will be performed in accordance with the requirements of the RFP may be evaluated less favorably or considered unacceptable.

Approaches that exceed the Government’s requirement may be evaluated more favorably.

(3) Factor 3, Safety:

The offeror shall submit the following information: The Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART) Rate; and Total Case Rate (TCR) for the specified five (5) Calendar Years (CY), as well as a safety narrative, as described further below. For a partnership or joint venture, the offeror shall submit separate DART rates and TCR for the specified five (5) CY for each contractor who is part of the partnership/joint venture; however, only one safety narrative is required. Any fatalities experienced within this 5-year timeframe must be explained in detail, to include root cause and corrective actions.

NOTE: DART and TCR shall not be submitted for subcontractors

1. DART Rate: Submit five (5) previous complete calendar years’ [CY2016, CY2017, CY2018, CY2019, and CY2020] worth of data (not an overall average). If the offeror has no DART rate, for any year, affirmatively state so and explain why. Should a negative trend occur above moderate risk levels, an acceptable/detailed explanation is required that includes any corrective actions taken for improvement.

a. DART cases include injuries or illnesses resulting in death, days away from work, and/or restricted work or transfer to another job days beyond the day of injury/illness.

b. Calculation of DART rate: Multiply the total number of DART cases by 200,000, and then divide by the number of employee labor hours worked.

2. TCR Rate: Submit five (5) previous complete calendar years’ [CY2016, CY2017, CY2018, CY2019, and CY2020] worth of data (not an overall average). If the offeror has no TCR rate, for any year, affirmatively state so and explain why. should a negative trend occur above moderate risk levels, an acceptable/detailed explanation is required that includes any corrective actions taken for improvement.

a. TCR cases include injuries or illnesses resulting in death, days away from work, restricted work or transfer to another job days beyond the day of injury/illness, medical treatment beyond first aid, or loss of consciousness.

b. Calculation of TCR rate: Multiply the total number of TCR incidents by 200,000, and then divide by the number of employee labor hours worked.

3. Technical Approach to Safety: Submit a narrative that addresses the following:

a Describe the offeror’ s approach to implementing and executing a Safety Management System (SMS) including Management/Leadership involvement, Employee involvement, Hazard prevention, Hazard control, Worksite analysis, and Safety and health training, to include the standard(s) used to benchmark the SMS.

b. Describe the evaluation process used to select potential subcontractors.

c. Describe the processes of how the offeror will oversee safety compliance of subcontractors at all levels throughout performance of the contract (to include the offeror’s own in-house workforce).

d. The Technical Approach to Safety narrative shall be limited to two (2) single-sided pages or one (1) double-sided page.

4. The Government reserves the right to review other available sources (public/Government internal) of information. These may include but are not limited to OSHA data, NAVFAC’s Contractor Incident Reporting System (CIRS), Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), Electronic Contract Management System (eCMS), etc.

(ii) Basis of Evaluation:

The Government is seeking to determine that the offeror has consistently demonstrated a commitment to safety and that the offeror plans to properly manage and implement safety procedures for itself and its subcontractors. The evaluation will collectively consider the DART rate, TCR, Technical Approach to Safety, and other sources of information available to the Government as part of such collective evaluation. The board will evaluate the DART rates and TCR to determine if the offeror has demonstrated a history of safe work practices taking into account any negative trends and extenuating circumstances that impact the rating.

1. DART Rate: The board will evaluate trends over the last five years considering changes that take it from one risk level (or more) to the next up or down. Negative trends occurring above moderate risk levels require the offeror to provide a detailed explanation that includes any corrective actions taken for improvement.

a. Missing data without an explanation is considered a deficiency.

b. Declining trends that push the risk levels from Moderate Risk (MR) or higher to Low Risk (LR) or Very Low Risk (VLR) would indicate a strength.

c. An increasing DART rate trend could be considered a weakness (i.e. MR or better to High Risk (HR) or Extremely High Risk EHR)) if an acceptable explanation is not provided for any trends that rise above Moderate.

d. This chart correlates the DART rate to the level of risk:

Risk DART Rate Very Low Risk Less Than 1.0 Low Risk From 1.0 to 1.99 Moderate Risk From 2.0 to 2.99 High Risk From 3.0 to 4.0

Extremely High Risk Greater than 4.0

2. TCR Rate: The board will evaluate trends over the last five years considering changes that take it from one risk level (or more) to the next up or down. Negative trends occurring above moderate risk levels require the offeror to provide a detailed explanation that includes any corrective actions taken for improvement.

a. Missing data without an explanation is considered a deficiency.

b. Declining trends that push the risk levels from Moderate Risk (MR) or higher to Low Risk (LR) or Very Low Risk (VLR) would indicate a strength.

c. An increasing TCR rate trend could be considered a weakness (i.e. MR or better to High Risk (HR) or Extremely High Risk EHR)) if an acceptable explanation is not provided for any trends that rise above Moderate.

d. This chart correlates the TCR rate to the level of risk:

Risk TCR Rate Very Low Risk Less Than 2.49 Low Risk From 2.5 to 3.49 Moderate Risk From 3.5 to 4.49 High Risk From 4.5 to 5.99 Extremely High Risk Greater than 6.0

3. The Technical Approach to Safety Narrative. To determine the degree to which the offeror:

a. Describes a viable SMS that addresses elements; such as Management/Leadership involvement, Employee involvement, Hazard prevention, Hazard control, Worksite analysis, and Safety and health training, to include the standard(s) used to benchmark the SMS.

b. Describes a methodical process of evaluating subcontractor’s safety performance in their selection process.

c. Describes a logical management plan to hold themselves and their subcontractors accountable for adhering to the safety requirements of the contract.

d. The Technical Approach to Safety narrative shall be limited to two (2) single-sided pages or one (1) double-sided page. Information on pages beyond this will not be considered.

4. The Government reserves the right to review other available sources (public/Government internal) of information.

These may include but are not limited to OSHA data, NAVFAC’s Contractor Incident Reporting System (CIRS), Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), Electronic Contract Management System (eCMS), etc.

(4) Factor 4, Past Performance:

IF A COMPLETED CPARS EVALUATION IS AVAILABLE FOR EACH PROJECT SUBMITTED IN

RESPONSE TO FACTOR 1, IT SHALL BE SUBMITTED WITH THE PROPOSAL. IF THERE IS NOT A

COMPLETED CPARS EVALUATION, the Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) included in the solicitation is provided for the offeror or its team members to submit to the client for each project the offeror includes in its proposal for Factor 1, Corporate Experience. AN OFFEROR SHALL NOT SUBMIT A PPQ WHEN A

COMPLETED CPARS IS AVAILABLE.

IF A CPARS EVALUATION IS NOT AVAILABLE, ensure correct phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client point of contact. Completed PPQs should be submitted with your proposal. If the offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before the proposal closing date, the offeror should complete and submit with the proposal the first page of the PPQ (provided as an attachment), which will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s). Offerors should follow up with clients/references to ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government's point of contact, Courtney Peterson, via email at courtney.j.peterson@navy.mil (with a copy to Cari Fiebach at cari.fiebach@navy.mil) prior to the proposal closing date. Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQs or CPARS previously submitted for other RFPs. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation.

In addition to the above, the Government may review any other sources of information for evaluating past performance. Other sources may include, but are not limited to, past performance information retrieved through the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) using all CAGE/Entity Identifier numbers of team members (partnership, joint venture, teaming arrangement, or parent company/subsidiary/affiliate) identified in the offeror’s proposal, inquiries of owner representative(s), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), and any other known sources not provided by the offeror.

While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate and complete past performance information rests with the offeror.

The Government will evaluate how well the offeror performed on the recent, relevant projects submitted under Factor 1, Corporate Experience, and on other recent, relevant contracts documented in known sources. There are three aspects of the past performance evaluation: recency, relevancy, and quality. The first is to evaluate the recency of the offeror’s past performance. The second aspect is to determine the relevancy of the offeror’s past performance. For purposes of this evaluation, the criteria identified in Factor 1, Corporate Experience will be utilized in determining relevancy. The third aspect is to evaluate the overall quality of the offeror’s past performance and how well the offeror performed on the projects. The past performance evaluation does not establish, create, or change the existing record and history of the offeror’s past performance on past contracts; rather, the past performance evaluation process gathers information from customers on how well the offeror performed on those past contracts.

The Government will evaluate the degree to which past performance evaluations and all other past performance information reviewed by the Government (e.g., CPARS, Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), and information obtained from any other source) reflect a trend of satisfactory performance considering:

A pattern of successful completion of tasks;

A pattern of deliverables that are timely and of good quality;

A pattern of cooperativeness and teamwork with the Government at all levels (task managers, contracting officers, auditors, etc.); and Recency/relevancy (as defined for Factor 1) of tasks performed that are identical to, similar to, or related to the task at hand

In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past contract performance is not available, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance in accordance with FAR 15.305(a)(2)(iv). In this case, the offeror’s past performance is unknown and assigned a confidence rating of “neutral.”

(End of Summary of Changes)