32 12 16 Amendment 0003.pdf
PDF 95 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Alert Facility and Alert Apron Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- N69450-20-R-0129
About this file
This solicitation seeks design-build-construction services for an Alert Facility and Alert Apron at Naval Air Station Joint Reserve Base New Orleans. The scope of work includes construction of Aerospace Control Alert Facilities with two aircraft shelters, aircrew alert quarters, and an Alternate Command Post, as well as a parking apron for two alert ready aircraft. Additional requirements comprise site utilities and security upgrades such as fencing, lighting, and communications. The contract will be awarded as a firm-fixed-price agreement for a period of 1300 calendar days from award. The total project budget is estimated between $25 million and $100 million. This full and open competition solicitation is issued by the Naval Facilities Engineering Command.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 50
Alert Facility and Alert Apron has more files on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
NORTHCOM CONSTRUCT ALERT APRON/FACILITIES WON: 1323108/1621243
NAS JRB NEW ORLEANS, LOUISIANA B-3 DESIGN SUBMITTAL
SECTION 32 12 16
HOT-MIX ASPHALT (HMA) FOR ROADS
08/09
PART 1 GENERAL
1.1 UNIT PRICES
1.1.1 Method of Measurement
The amount paid for will be the number of short tons of hot-mix asphalt mixture used in the accepted work. Weigh hot-mix asphalt mixture after mixing, and no separate payment will be made for weight of asphalt cement material incorporated herein.
1.1.2 Basis of Payment
1.1.3 Percent Payment
Submit pay calculations. When a lot of material fails to meet the specification requirements for 100 percent pay, as outlined in the following paragraphs, that lot shall be removed and replaced, or accepted at a reduced price which will be computed by multiplying the unit price by the lot's pay factor. The lot pay factor is determined by taking the lowest computed pay factor based on either laboratory air voids, in-place density, grade or smoothness (each discussed below). At the end of the project, an average of all lot pay factors will be calculated. If this average lot pay factor equals or exceeds 95.0 percent, and no individual lot has a pay factor less than 75.1 percent, then the percent payment for the entire project will be 100 percent of the unit bid price. If the average lot pay factor is less than 95.0 percent, then each lot will be paid for at the unit price multiplied by the lot's pay factor. For any lots which are less than 2000 short tons, a weighted lot pay factor will be used to calculate the average lot pay factor.
1.1.4 Laboratory Air Voids and Theoretical Maximum Density
Laboratory air voids will be calculated by determining the Marshall or Superpave density of each lab compacted specimen using the laboratory-prepared, thoroughly dry method of ASTM D2726/D2726M and determining the theoretical maximum density of every other sublot sample using ASTM D2041/D2041M. Laboratory air void calculations for each sublot will use the latest theoretical maximum density values obtained, either for that sublot or the previous sublot. The mean absolute deviation of the four laboratory air void contents (one from each sublot) from the JMF air void content will be evaluated and a pay factor determined from Table 1.
All laboratory air void tests will be completed and reported within 24 hours after completion of construction of each lot.
1.1.5 Mean Absolute Deviation
An example of the computation of mean absolute deviation for laboratory air voids is as follows: Assume that the laboratory air voids are determined from 4 random samples of a lot (where 3 specimens were compacted from each sample). The average laboratory air voids for each sublot sample are
SECTION 32 12 16 Page 1 michelle.contestabil Text Box
REVISION 1: AMENDMENT 0003
determined to be 3.5, 3.0, 4.0, and 3.7. Assume that the target air voids from the JMF is 4.0. The mean absolute deviation is then:
Mean Absolute Deviation = (|3.5 - 4.0| + |3.0 - 4.0| + |4.0 - 4.0| + |3.7 - 4.0|/4
= (0.5 + 1.0 + 0.0 + 0.3)/4 = (1.8)/4 = 0.45
The mean absolute deviation for laboratory air voids is determined to be
0.45. It can be seen from Table 1 that the lot's pay factor based on laboratory air voids, is 100 percent.
Table 1. Pay Factor Based on Laboratory Air Voids
Mean Absolute Deviation of Lab Air Voids from JMF
Pay Factor, percent
O.60 or less 100
0.61 - 0.80 98
0.81 - 1.00 95
1.01 - 1.20 90
Above 1.20 reject (0)
1.1.6 In-place Density
For determining in-place density, one random core (4 inches or 6 inches in diameter) will be taken by the Government from the mat (interior of the lane) of each sublot, and one random core will be taken from the joint (immediately over joint) of each sublot. Each random core will be full thickness of the layer being placed. When the random core is less than 1 inch thick, it will not be included in the analysis. In this case, another random core will be taken. After air drying to a constant weight, cores obtained from the mat and from the joints will be used for in-place density determination.
1.1.7 Mat and Joint Densities
The average in-place mat and joint densities are expressed as a percentage of the average TMD for the lot. The TMD for each lot will be determined as the average TMD of the two random samples per lot. The average in-place mat density and joint density for a lot are determined and compared with Table 2 to calculate a single pay factor per lot based on in-place density, as described below. First, a pay factor for both mat density and joint density are determined from Table 2. The area associated with the joint is then determined and will be considered to be 5 feet wide times the length of completed longitudinal construction joint in the lot. This area will not exceed the total lot size. The length of joint to be considered will be that length where a new lane has been placed against an adjacent lane of hot-mix asphalt pavement, either an adjacent freshly paved lane or one paved at any time previously. The area associated with the joint is expressed as a percentage of the total lot area. A weighted pay factor for the joint is determined based on this percentage (see example below). The pay factor for mat density and the weighted pay factor for joint density is
SECTION 32 12 16 Page 2 compared and the lowest selected. This selected pay factor is the pay factor based on density for the lot. When the TMD on both sides of a longitudinal joint is different, the average of these two TMD will be used as the TMD needed to calculate the percent joint density. All density results for a lot will be completed and reported within 24 hours after the construction of that lot.
Table 2. Pay Factor Based on In-place Density
Average Mat Density (4 Cores) (Percent of TMD)
Pay Factor, Percent Average Joint Density (4 Cores) (Percent of
TMD)
94.0 - 96.0 100.0 92.5 or above
93.9 100.0 92.4
93.8 or 96.1 99.9 92.3
93.7 99.8 92.2
93.6 or 96.2 99.6 92.1
93.5 99.4 92.0
93.4 or 96.3 99.1 91.9
93.3 98.7 91.8
93.2 or 96.4 98.3 91.7
93.1 97.8 91.6
93.0 or 96.5 97.3 91.5
92.9 96.3 91.4
92.8 or 96.6 94.1 91.3
92.7 92.2 91.2
92.6 or 96.7 90.3 91.1
92.5 87.9 91.0
92.4 or 96.8 85.7 90.9
92.3 83.3 90.8
92.2 or 96.9 80.6 90.7
92.1 78.0 90.6
92.0 or 97.0 75.0 90.5
SECTION 32 12 16 Page 3
Table 2. Pay Factor Based on In-place Density
Average Mat Density (4 Cores) (Percent of TMD)
Pay Factor, Percent Average Joint Density (4 Cores) (Percent of
TMD)
below 92.0 or above 97.0 0.0 (reject) below 90.5
1.1.8 Pay Factor Based on In-place Density
An example of the computation of a pay factor (in I-P units only) based on in-place density, is as follows: Assume the following test results for field density made on the lot: (1) Average mat density = 93.2 percent of TMD. (2) Average joint density = 91.5 percent of TMD. (3) Total area of lot = 30,000 square feet. (4) Length of completed longitudinal construction joint = 2000 feet.
1.1.8.1 Step 1
Determine pay factor based on mat density and on joint density, using Table 2:
Mat Density 93.2 percent equals 98.3 pay factor
Joint Density 91.5 percent equals 97.3 pay factor
1.1.8.2 Step 2
Determine ratio of joint area (length of longitudinal joint x 5 ft) to mat area (total paved area in the lot): Multiply the length of completed longitudinal construction joint by the specified 5 ft. width and divide by the mat area (total paved area in the lot).
(2000 ft. x 5 ft.)/30,000 sq.ft. = 0.3333 ratio of joint area to mat area (ratio).
1.1.8.3 Step 3
Weighted pay factor (wpf) for joint is determined as indicated below:
wpf = joint pay factor + (100 - joint pay factor) (1 - ratio) wpf = 97.3 + (100-97.3) (1-.3333) = 99.1 percent
1.1.8.4 Step 4
Compare weighted pay factor for joint density to pay factor for mat density and select the smaller:
a. Pay factor for mat density: 98.3 percent. Weighted pay factor for joint density: 99.1 percent
b. Select the smaller of the two values as pay factor based on density:
98.3 percent
SECTION 32 12 16 Page 4
1.1.9 Pay Factor for Grade
When more than 5 percent of all measurements made within a lot are outside the 0.05 foot tolerance, the pay factor based on grade for that lot will be 95 percent. In areas where the grade exceeds the tolerance by more than 50 percent, remove the surface lift full depth and replace the lift with hot-mix asphalt to meet specification requirements, at no additional cost to the Government.
1.1.10 Payment Adjustment for Smoothness
1.1.10.1 Straightedge Testing
Record location and deviation from straightedge for all measurements. When between 5.0 and 10.0 percent of all measurements made within a lot exceed the tolerance specified in paragraph Smoothness Requirements above, after any reduction of high spots or removal and replacement, the computed pay factor for that lot based on surface smoothness, will be 95 percent. When more than 10.0 percent of all measurements exceed the tolerance, the computed pay factor will be 90 percent. When between 15.0 and 20.0 percent of all measurements exceed the tolerance, the computed pay factor will be 75 percent. When 20.0 percent or more of the measurements exceed the tolerance, the lot shall be removed and replaced at no additional cost to the Government. Regardless of the above, any small individual area with surface deviation which exceeds the tolerance given above by more than 50 percent, shall be corrected by diamond grinding to meet the specification requirements above or shall be removed and replaced at no additional cost to the Government.
1.1.10.2 Profilograph Testing
Record location and data from all profilograph measurements. When the Profile Index of a 0.1 mile segment of a lot exceeds the tolerance specified in paragraph Smoothness Requirements above by 1.0 inch/mile, but less than 2.0 inches/mile, after any reduction of high spots or removal and replacement, the computed pay factor for that lot based on surface smoothness will be 95 percent. When the Profile Index exceeds the tolerance by 2.0 inches/mile, but less than 3.0 inches/mile, the computed pay factor will be 90 percent. When the Profile Index exceeds the tolerance by 3.0 inches/mile, but less than 4.0 inches/mile, the computed pay factor will be 75 percent. When the Profile Index exceeds the tolerance by 4.0 inches/mile or more, the lot shall be removed and replaced at no additional cost to the Government. Regardless of the above, any small individual area with surface deviation which exceeds the tolerance given above by more than 5.0 inches/mile or more, shall be corrected by grinding to meet the specification requirements above or shall be removed and replaced at no additional cost to the Government.
1.1.10.3 Bumps ("Must Grind" Areas)
Any bumps ("must grind" areas) shown on the profilograph trace which exceed
0.3 inch in height shall be reduced by diamond grinding until they do not exceed 0.3 inch when retested. Such grinding shall be tapered in all directions to provide smooth transitions to areas not requiring grinding.
The following will not be permitted: (1) skin patching for correcting low areas, (2) planing or milling for correcting high areas. At the Contractor's option, pavement areas, including ground areas, may be rechecked with the profilograph in order to record a lower Profile Index.
SECTION 32 12 16 Page 5
1.2 REFERENCES
The publications listed below form a part of this specification to the extent referenced. The publications are referred to within the text by the basic designation only.
AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF STATE HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION OFFICIALS
(AASHTO)
AASHTO M 156 (2013; R 2017) Standard Specification for Requirements for Mixing Plants for Hot-Mixed, Hot-Laid Bituminous Paving Mixtures
AASHTO M 320 (2017) Standard Specification for Performance-Graded Asphalt Binder
AASHTO T 304 (2011; R 2015) Standard Method of Test for Uncompacted Void Content of Fine Aggregate
ASPHALT INSTITUTE (AI)
AI MS-2 (2015) Asphalt Mix Design Methods
AI MS-22 (2001; 2nd Ed) Construction of Hot-Mix Asphalt Pavements
AI SP-2 (2001; 3rd Ed) Superpave Mix Design
ASTM INTERNATIONAL (ASTM)
ASTM C29/C29M (2017a) Standard Test Method for Bulk Density ("Unit Weight") and Voids in Aggregate
ASTM C88 (2018) Standard Test Method for Soundness of Aggregates by Use of Sodium Sulfate or Magnesium Sulfate
ASTM C117 (2017) Standard Test Method for Materials Finer than 75-um (No. 200) Sieve in Mineral Aggregates by Washing
ASTM C127 (2015) Standard Test Method for Density, Relative Density (Specific Gravity), and Absorption of Coarse Aggregate
ASTM C128 (2015) Standard Test Method for Density, Relative Density (Specific Gravity), and Absorption of Fine Aggregate
ASTM C131/C131M (2014) Standard Test Method for Resistance to Degradation of Small-Size Coarse Aggregate by Abrasion and Impact in the Los Angeles Machine
ASTM C136/C136M (2014) Standard Test Method for Sieve Analysis of Fine and Coarse Aggregates
SECTION 32 12 16 Page 6
ASTM C142/C142M (2017) Standard Test Method for Clay Lumps and Friable Particles in Aggregates
ASTM C566 (2013) Standard Test Method for Total Evaporable Moisture Content of Aggregate by Drying
ASTM D140/D140M (2016) Standard Practice for Sampling Asphalt Materials
ASTM D242/D242M (2009; R 2014) Mineral Filler for Bituminous Paving Mixtures
ASTM D1461 (2017) Standard Test Method for Moisture or Volatile Distillates in Asphalt Mixtures
ASTM D2041/D2041M (2011) Theoretical Maximum Specific Gravity and Density of Bituminous Paving Mixtures
ASTM D2172/D2172M (2017; E 2018) Standard Test Methods for Quantitative Extraction of Asphalt Binder from Asphalt Mixtures
ASTM D2419 (2014) Sand Equivalent Value of Soils and Fine Aggregate
ASTM D2489/D2489M (2016) Standard Test Method for Estimating Degree of Particle Coating of Asphalt Mixtures
ASTM D2726/D2726M (20172019) Standard Test Method for Bulk Specific Gravity and Density of Non-Absorptive Compacted Bituminous Mixtures
ASTM D2950/D2950M (2014) Density of Bituminous Concrete in Place by Nuclear Methods
ASTM D3665 (2012; R 2017) Standard Practice for Random Sampling of Construction Materials
ASTM D3666 (2016) Standard Specification for Minimum Requirements for Agencies Testing and Inspecting Road and Paving Materials
ASTM D4125/D4125M (2010) Asphalt Content of Bituminous Mixtures by the Nuclear Method
ASTM D4791 (2010) Flat Particles, Elongated Particles, or Flat and Elongated Particles in Coarse Aggregate
ASTM D4867/D4867M (2009; R 2014) Effect of Moisture on Asphalt Concrete Paving Mixtures
ASTM D5444 (2015) Mechanical Size Analysis of Extracted Aggregate
SECTION 32 12 16 Page 7
ASTM D6307 (2019) Standard Test Method for Asphalt Content of Asphalt Mixture by Ignition Method
ASTM D6925 (2014) Standard Test Method for Preparation and Determination of the Relative Density of Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) Specimens by Means of the Superpave Gyratory Compactor
ASTM D6926 (2016) Standard Practice for Preparation of Asphalt Mixture Specimens Using Marshall Apparatus
ASTM D6927 (2015) Standard Test Method for Marshall Stability and Flow of Bituminous Mixtures
STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (CALTRANS)
CTM 526 (2012) Method of Test for Operation of California Profilograph and Evaluation of Profiles
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS (USACE)
COE CRD-C 171 (1995) Standard Test Method for Determining Percentage of Crushed Particles in Aggregate
1.3 SUBMITTALS
Government approval is required for submittals with a "G" designation;
submittals not having a "G" designation are for Contractor Quality Control approval. Submittals with an "S" are for inclusion in the Sustainability eNotebook, in conformance to Section 01 33 29 SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING.
Submit the following in accordance with Section 01 33 00 SUBMITTAL
PROCEDURES:
SD-03 Product Data
Mix Design; G
Quality Control; G
Material Acceptance; G
Percent Payment; G
SD-04 Samples
Asphalt Cement Binder
Aggregates
SD-06 Test Reports
Aggregates; G
QC Monitoring
SECTION 32 12 16 Page 8
SD-07 Certificates
Asphalt Cement Binder; G
Testing Laboratory
1.4 ENVIRONMENTAL REQUIREMENTS
Do not place the hot-mix asphalt upon a wet surface or when the surface temperature of the underlying course is less than specified in Table 3.
The temperature requirements may be waived by the Contracting Officer, if requested; however, meet all other requirements, including compaction.
Table 3. Surface Temperature Limitations of Underlying Course
Mat Thickness, inches Degrees F
3 or greater 40
Less than 3 45
PART 2 PRODUCTS
2.1 SYSTEM DESCRIPTION
Perform the work consisting of pavement courses composed of mineral aggregate and asphalt material heated and mixed in a central mixing plant and placed on a prepared course. HMA designed and constructed in accordance with this section shall conform to the lines, grades, thicknesses, and typical cross sections indicated. Construct each course to the depth, section, or elevation required by the drawings and roll, finish, and approve it before the placement of the next course.
2.1.1 Asphalt Mixing Plant
Plants used for the preparation of hot-mix asphalt shall conform to the requirements of AASHTO M 156 with the following changes:
2.1.1.1 Truck Scales
Weigh the asphalt mixture on approved, certified scales at the Contractor's expense. Inspect and seal scales at least annually by an approved calibration laboratory.
2.1.1.2 Testing Facilities
Provide laboratory facilities at the plant for the use of the Government's acceptance testing and the Contractor's quality control testing.
2.1.1.3 Inspection of Plant
Provide the Contracting Officer with access at all times, to all areas of the plant for checking adequacy of equipment; inspecting operation of the plant; verifying weights, proportions, and material properties; checking the temperatures maintained in the preparation of the mixtures and for taking samples. Provide assistance as requested, for the Government to
SECTION 32 12 16 Page 9 procure any desired samples.
2.1.1.4 Storage bins
Use of storage bins for temporary storage of hot-mix asphalt will be permitted as follows:
a. The asphalt mixture may be stored in non-insulated storage bins for a period of time not exceeding 3 hours.
b. The asphalt mixture may be stored in insulated storage bins for a period of time not exceeding 8 hours. The mix drawn from bins shall meet the same requirements as mix loaded directly into trucks.
2.1.2 Hauling Equipment
Provide trucks for hauling hot-mix asphalt having tight, clean, and smooth metal beds. To prevent the mixture from adhering to them, the truck beds shall be lightly coated with a minimum amount of paraffin oil, lime solution, or other approved material. Petroleum based products shall not be used as a release agent. Each truck shall have a suitable cover to protect the mixture from adverse weather. When necessary to ensure that the mixture will be delivered to the site at the specified temperature, truck beds shall be insulated or heated and covers (tarps) shall be securely fastened.
2.1.3 Asphalt Pavers
Provide asphalt pavers which are self-propelled, with an activated screed, heated as necessary, and capable of spreading and finishing courses of hot-mix asphalt which will meet the specified thickness, smoothness, and grade. The paver shall have sufficient power to propel itself and the hauling equipment without adversely affecting the finished surface.
2.1.3.1 Receiving Hopper
Provide paver with a receiving hopper of sufficient capacity to permit a uniform spreading operation and equipped with a distribution system to place the mixture uniformly in front of the screed without segregation.
The screed shall effectively produce a finished surface of the required evenness and texture without tearing, shoving, or gouging the mixture.
2.1.3.2 Automatic Grade Controls
Equip the paver with a control system capable of automatically maintaining the specified screed elevation. The control system shall be automatically actuated from either a reference line and/or through a system of mechanical sensors or sensor-directed mechanisms or devices which will maintain the paver screed at a predetermined transverse slope and at the proper elevation to obtain the required surface. The transverse slope controller shall be capable of maintaining the screed at the desired slope within plus or minus 0.1 percent. A transverse slope controller shall not be used to control grade. Provide controls capable of working in conjunction with any of the following attachments:
a. Ski-type device of not less than 30 feet in length.
b. Taut stringline set to grade.
SECTION 32 12 16 Page 10
c. Short ski or shoe for joint matching.
d. Laser control.
2.1.4 Rollers
Rollers shall be in good condition and shall be operated at slow speeds to avoid displacement of the asphalt mixture. The number, type, and weight of rollers shall be sufficient to compact the mixture to the required density while it is still in a workable condition. Do not use equipment which causes excessive crushing of the aggregate.
2.2 AGGREGATES
Provide aggregates consisting of crushed stone, crushed gravel, crushed slag, screenings, natural sand and mineral filler, as required. Submit sufficient materials to produce 200 lb of blended mixture for mix design verification. The portion of material retained on the No. 4 sieve is coarse aggregate. The portion of material passing the No. 4 sieve and retained on the No. 200 sieve is fine aggregate. The portion passing the No. 200 sieve is defined as mineral filler. Submit all aggregate test results and samples to the Contracting Officer at least 14 days prior to start of construction.
2.2.1 Coarse Aggregate
Provide coarse aggregate consisting of sound, tough, durable particles, free from films of material that would prevent thorough coating and bonding with the asphalt material and free from organic matter and other deleterious substances. All individual coarse aggregate sources shall meet the following requirements:
a. The percentage of loss shall not be greater than 40 percent after 500 revolutions when tested in accordance with ASTM C131/C131M.
b. The percentage of loss shall not be greater than 18 percent after five cycles when tested in accordance with ASTM C88 using magnesium sulfate .
c. At least 75 percent by weight of coarse aggregate shall have at least two or more fractured faces when tested in accordance with COE CRD-C 171.
Fractured faces shall be produced by crushing.
d. The particle shape shall be essentially cubical and the aggregate shall not contain more than 20 percent percent, by weight, of flat and elongated particles (3:1 ratio of maximum to minimum) when tested in accordance with ASTM D4791.
e. Slag shall be air-cooled, blast furnace slag, with a compacted weight of not less than 75 lb/cu ft when tested in accordance with
ASTM C29/C29M.
f. Clay lumps and friable particles shall not exceed 0.3 percent, by weight, when tested in accordance with ASTM C142/C142M.
2.2.2 Fine Aggregate
Fine aggregate shall consist of clean, sound, tough, durable particles free from coatings of clay, silt, or any objectionable material and containing no clay balls.
SECTION 32 12 16 Page 11
a. All individual fine aggregate sources shall have a sand equivalent value not less than 45 when tested in accordance with ASTM D2419.
b. The fine aggregate portion of the blended aggregate shall have an uncompacted void content not less than 45.0 percent when tested in accordance with AASHTO T 304 Method A.
c. The quantity of natural sand (noncrushed material) added to the aggregate blend shall not exceed 25 percent by weight of total aggregate.
d. Clay lumps and friable particles shall not exceed 0.3 percent, by weight, when tested in accordance with ASTM C142/C142M
2.2.3 Mineral Filler
Mineral filler shall be nonplastic material meeting the requirements of
ASTM D242/D242M.
2.2.4 Aggregate Gradation
The combined aggregate gradation shall conform to gradations specified in Table 4, when tested in accordance with ASTM C136/C136M and ASTM C117, and shall not vary from the low limit on one sieve to the high limit on the adjacent sieve or vice versa, but grade uniformly from coarse to fine.
Table 4. Aggregate Gradations
Sieve Size, inch Gradation 1 Percent Passing by Mass
Gradation 2 Percent Passing by Mass
Gradation 3 Percent Passing by Mass
1 100 --- ---
3/4 76-96 100 ---
1/2 68-88 76-96 100
3/8 60-82 69-89 76-96
No. 4 45-67 53-73 58-78
No. 8 32-54 38-60 40-60
No. 16 22-44 26-48 28-48
No. 30 15-35 18-38 18-38
No. 50 9-25 11-27 11-27
No. 100 6-18 6-18 6-18
No. 200 3-6 3-6 3-6
SECTION 32 12 16 Page 12
2.3 ASPHALT CEMENT BINDER
Submit a 5 gallon sample for mix design verification. Asphalt cement binder shall conform to AASHTO M 320 Performance Grade (PG) . Test data indicating grade certification shall be provided by the supplier at the time of delivery of each load to the mix plant. Submit copies of these certifications to the Contracting Officer. The supplier is defined as the last source of any modification to the binder. The Contracting Officer may sample and test the binder at the mix plant at any time before or during mix production. Obtain samples for this verification testing in accordance with ASTM D140/D140M and in the presence of the Contracting Officer.
Furnish these samples to the Contracting Officer for the verification testing, which shall be at no cost to the Contractor. Submit samples of the asphalt cement specified for approval not less than 14 days before start of the test section. Submit copies of certified test data, amount, type and description of any modifiers blended into the asphalt cement binder.
2.4 MIX DESIGN
a. Develop the mix design. The asphalt mix shall be composed of a mixture of well-graded aggregate, mineral filler if required, and asphalt material. The aggregate fractions shall be sized, handled in separate size groups, and combined in such proportions that the resulting mixture meets the grading requirements of the job mix formula (JMF).
Submit proposed JMF; do not produce hot-mix asphalt for payment until a JMF has been approved. The hot-mix asphalt shall be designed in accordance with Marshall (MS-02), Superpave (SP-2), or Hveem (MS-02) procedures and the criteria shown in Table 5. Use the hand-held hammer to compact the specimens for Marshall mix design. If the Tensile Strength Ratio (TSR) of the composite mixture, as determined by ASTM D4867/D4867M is less than 75, the aggregates shall be rejected or the asphalt mixture treated with an approved anti-stripping agent. The amount of anti-stripping agent added shall be sufficient to produce a TSR of not less than 75. Provide an antistrip agent, if required, at no additional cost. Sufficient materials to produce 200 pound of blended mixture shall be provided to the Contracting Officer for verification of mix design at least 14 days prior to construction of test section.
b. At the option of the Contractor, a currently used DOT Superpave hot mix may be used in lieu of developing a Marshall hot mix design as described herein. Design the Superpave volumetric mix in accordance with AI SP-2 and ASTM D6925. The nominal maximum aggregate size (NMAS) shall be 1/2 inch. Other DOT hot mix design methods (Hveem, etc.) may be suitable, as determined by the Contracting Officer. The number of compaction gyrations, Ndes, shall be based on a design traffic of equivalent single axle loads (EASLs).
c. Design Superpave mixes with the number of gyrations specified in Table 5, unless the DOT option is chosen.
2.4.1 JMF Requirements
Submit in writing the job mix formula for approval at least 14 days prior to the start of the test section including as a minimum:
a. Percent passing each sieve size.
SECTION 32 12 16 Page 13
b. Percent of asphalt cement.
c. Percent of each aggregate and mineral filler to be used.
d. Asphalt viscosity grade, penetration grade, or performance grade.
e. Number of blows of hand-held hammer per side of molded specimen. (NA for Superpave)
f. Number of gyrations of Superpave gyratory compactor, (NA for Marshall mix design)
g. Laboratory mixing temperature.
h. Lab compaction temperature.
i. Temperature-viscosity relationship of the asphalt cement.
j. Plot of the combined gradation on the 0.45 power gradation chart, stating the nominal maximum size.
k. Graphical plots of stability (NA for Superpave), flow (NA for Superpave), air voids, voids in the mineral aggregate, and unit weight versus asphalt content as shown in AI MS-2.
l. Specific gravity and absorption of each aggregate.
m. Percent natural sand.
n. Percent particles with 2 or more fractured faces (in coarse aggregate).
o. Fine aggregate angularity.
p. Percent flat or elongated particles (in coarse aggregate).
q. Tensile Strength Ratio(TSR).
r. Antistrip agent (if required) and amount.
s. List of all modifiers and amount.
t. Correlation of hand-held hammer with mechanical hammer (NA for Superpave).
u. Percentage and properties (asphalt content, binder properties, and aggregate properties) of reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP) in accordance with paragraph RECYCLED HOT-MIX ASPHALT, if RAP is used.
Table 5. Mix Design Criteria
Test Property 50 Blows or Mix Gyrations
75 Blows or Mix Gyrations
Stability, pounds, minimum (NA for Superpave)
*1000 *1800
Flow, 0.01 inch, (NA for Superpave)
8-18 8-16
SECTION 32 12 16 Page 14
Table 5. Mix Design Criteria
Test Property 50 Blows or Mix Gyrations
75 Blows or Mix Gyrations
Air voids, percent 3-5 3-5
Percent Voids in mineral aggregate (VMA),(minimum)
Gradation 1 13.0 13.0
Gradation 2 14.0 14.3
Gradation 3 15.0 15.0
TSR, minimum percent 75 75
* This is a minimum requirement. The average during construction shall be significantly higher than this number to ensure compliance with the specifications.
** Calculate VMA in accordance with AI MS-2, based on ASTM C127 and ASTM C128 bulk specific gravity for the aggregate.
2.4.2 Adjustments to Field JMF
Keep the Laboratory JMF for each mixture in effect until a new formula is approved in writing by the Contracting Officer. Should a change in sources of any materials be made, perform a new laboratory jmf design and a new JMF approved before the new material is used. The Contractor will be allowed to adjust the Laboratory JMF within the limits specified below to optimize mix volumetric properties with the approval of the Contracting Officer.
Adjustments to the Laboratory JMF shall be applied to the field (plant) established JMF and limited to those values as shown. Adjustments shall be targeted to produce or nearly produce 4 percent voids total mix (VTM).
TABLE 6. Field (Plant) Established JMF Tolerances
Sieves Adjustments (plus or minus), percent
1/2 inch 3
No. 4 3
No. 8 3
No. 200 1
Binder Content 0.4
If adjustments are needed that exceed these limits, develop a new mix design. Tolerances given above may permit the aggregate grading to be outside the limits shown in Table 4; while not desirable, this is acceptable, except for the No. 200 sieve, which shall remain within the
SECTION 32 12 16 Page 15 aggregate grading of Table 4.
2.5 RECYCLED HOT MIX ASPHALT
Recycled HMA shall consist of reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP), coarse aggregate, fine aggregate, mineral filler, and asphalt cement to produce a consistent gradation and asphalt content and properties. When RAP is fed into the plant, the maximum RAP chunk size shall not exceed 2 inches.
Design the recycled HMA mix using procedures contained in AI MS-2 and AI MS-22. The job mix shall meet the requirements of paragraph MIX DESIGN. The amount of RAP shall not exceed 30 percent.
2.5.1 RAP Aggregates and Asphalt Cement
The blend of aggregates used in the recycled mix shall meet the requirements of paragraph AGGREGATES. Establish the percentage of asphalt in the RAP for the mixture design according to ASTM D2172/D2172M or ASTM D6307 using the appropriate dust correction procedure.
2.5.2 RAP Mix
The blend of new asphalt cement and the RAP asphalt binder shall meet requirements in paragraph ASPHALT CEMENT BINDER. The virgin asphalt cement shall not be more than two standard asphalt material grades different than that specified in paragraph ASPHALT CEMENT BINDER.
PART 3 EXECUTION
3.1 PREPARATION OF ASPHALT BINDER MATERIAL
Heat the asphalt cement material avoiding local overheating and providing a continuous supply of the asphalt material to the mixer at a uniform temperature. The temperature of unmodified asphalts shall be no more than 325 degrees F when added to the aggregates. Performance-Graded (PG) asphalts shall be within the temperature range of degrees F when added to the aggregate.
3.2 PREPARATION OF MINERAL AGGREGATE
Heat and dry the aggregate for the mixture prior to mixing. No damage shall occur to the aggregates due to the maximum temperature and rate of heating used. The temperature of the aggregate and mineral filler shall not exceed 350 degrees F when the asphalt cement is added. The temperature shall not be lower than is required to obtain complete coating and uniform distribution on the aggregate particles and to provide a mixture of satisfactory workability.
3.3 PREPARATION OF HOT-MIX ASPHALT MIXTURE
The aggregates and the asphalt cement shall be weighed or metered and introduced into the mixer in the amount specified by the JMF. Mix the combined materials until the aggregate obtains a uniform coating of asphalt binder and is thoroughly distributed throughout the mixture. Wet mixing time shall be the shortest time that will produce a satisfactory mixture, but no less than 25 seconds for batch plants. Establish the wet mixing time for all plants based on the procedure for determining the percentage of coated particles described in ASTM D2489/D2489M, for each individual plant and for each type of aggregate used. The wet mixing time will be set to at least achieve 95 percent of coated particles. The moisture content
SECTION 32 12 16 Page 16 of all hot-mix asphalt upon discharge from the plant shall not exceed 0.5 percent by total weight of mixture as measured by ASTM D1461.
3.4 PREPARATION OF THE UNDERLYING SURFACE
Immediately before placing the hot mix asphalt, clean the underlying course of dust and debris. Apply a prime coat in accordance with the contract specifications.
3.5 TEST SECTION
Prior to full production, place a test section for each JMF used.
Construct a test section 250 - 500 feet long and two paver passes wide placed for two lanes, with a longitudinal cold joint. The test section shall be of the same thickness as the course which it represents. The underlying grade or pavement structure upon which the test section is to be constructed shall be the same as the remainder of the course represented by the test section. The equipment and personnel used in construction of the test section shall be the same equipment to be used on the remainder of the course represented by the test section. Place the test section as part of the project pavement, as approved by the Contracting Officer.
3.5.1 Sampling and Testing for Test Section
Take one random sample at the plant, triplicate specimens compacted, and tested for stability, flow, and laboratory air voids. Test a portion of the same sample for theoretical maximum density (TMD), aggregate gradation and asphalt content. Take four randomly selected cores from the finished pavement mat, and four from the longitudinal joint, and tested for density. Random sampling shall be in accordance with procedures contained in ASTM D3665. The test results shall be within the tolerances shown in Table 7 for work to continue. If all test results meet the specified requirements, the test section shall remain as part of the project pavement. If test results exceed the tolerances shown, the test section shall be removed and replaced at no cost to the Government and another test section shall be constructed. The test section shall be paid for with the first lot of paving
Table 7. Test Section Requirements for Material and Mixture Properties
Property Specification Limit
Aggregate Gradation-Percent Passing (Individual Test Result)
No. 4 and larger JMF plus or minus 8
No. 8, No. 16, No. 30, and No. 50 JMF plus or minus 6
No. 100 and No. 200 JMF plus or minus 2.0
Asphalt Content, Percent (Individual Test Result)
JMF plus or minus 0.5
Laboratory Air Voids, Percent (Average of 3 specimens)
JMF plus or minus 1.0
SECTION 32 12 16 Page 17
Table 7. Test Section Requirements for Material and Mixture Properties
Property Specification Limit
VMA, Percent (Average of 3 specimens) 13 minimum
Stability, pounds (Average of 3 specimens) (NA for Superpave)
1000 minimum for 50 blows
Flow, 0.01 inch (Average of 3 specimens) (NA for Superpave)
8 - 18 for 50 blows
Mat Density, Percent of TMD (Average of 4 Random Cores)
92.0 - 96.0
Joint Density, Percent of TMD (Average of 4 Random Cores)
90.5 - 92.5
3.5.2 Additional Test Sections
If the initial test section should prove to be unacceptable, make the necessary adjustments to the JMF, plant operation, placing procedures, and/or rolling procedures and place a second test section. Additional test sections, as required, shall be constructed and evaluated for conformance to the specifications. Full production shall not begin until an acceptable section has been constructed and accepted.
3.6 TESTING LABORATORY
Submit certification of compliance and Plant Scale Calibration Certification. Use a laboratory to develop the JMF that meets the requirements of ASTM D3666. The Government will inspect the laboratory equipment and test procedures prior to the start of hot mix operations for conformance to ASTM D3666. The laboratory shall maintain the Corps certification for the duration of the project. A statement signed by the manager of the laboratory stating that it meets these requirements or clearly listing all deficiencies shall be submitted to the Contracting Officer prior to the start of construction. The statement shall contain as a minimum:
a. Qualifications of personnel; laboratory manager, supervising technician, and testing technicians.
b. A listing of equipment to be used in developing the job mix.
c. A copy of the laboratory's quality control system.
d. Evidence of participation in the AASHTO Materials Reference Laboratory (AMRL) program.
3.7 TRANSPORTING AND PLACING
3.7.1 Transporting
Transport the hot-mix asphalt from the mixing plant to the site in clean, tight vehicles. Schedule deliveries so that placing and compacting of mixture is uniform with minimum stopping and starting of the paver.
SECTION 32 12 16 Page 18
Provide adequate artificial lighting for night placements. Hauling over freshly placed material will not be permitted until the material has been compacted as specified, and allowed to cool to 140 degrees F. To deliver mix to the paver, use a material transfer vehicle operated to produce continuous forward motion of the paver.
3.7.2 Placing
Place and compact the mix at a temperature suitable for obtaining density, surface smoothness, and other specified requirements. Upon arrival, place the mixture to the full width by an asphalt paver; it shall be struck off in a uniform layer of such depth that, when the work is completed, it will have the required thickness and conform to the grade and contour indicated. Regulate the speed of the paver to eliminate pulling and tearing of the asphalt mat. Unless otherwise permitted, placement of the mixture shall begin along the centerline of a crowned section or on the high side of areas with a one-way slope. Place the mixture in consecutive adjacent strips having a minimum width of 10 feet. The longitudinal joint in one course shall offset the longitudinal joint in the course immediately below by at least 1 foot; however, the joint in the surface course shall be at the centerline of the pavement. Transverse joints in one course shall be offset by at least 10 feet from transverse joints in the previous course. Transverse joints in adjacent lanes shall be offset a minimum of 10 feet. On isolated areas where irregularities or unavoidable obstacles make the use of mechanical spreading and finishing equipment impractical, the mixture may be spread and luted by hand tools.
3.8 COMPACTION OF MIXTURE
After placing, the mixture shall be thoroughly and uniformly compacted by rolling. Compact the surface as soon as possible without causing displacement, cracking or shoving. The sequence of rolling operations and the type of rollers used shall be at the discretion of the Contractor. The speed of the roller shall, at all times, be sufficiently slow to avoid displacement of the hot mixture and be effective in compaction. Any displacement occurring as a result of reversing the direction of the roller, or from any other cause, shall be corrected at once. Furnish sufficient rollers to handle the output of the plant. Continue rolling until the surface is of uniform texture, true to grade and cross section, and the required field density is obtained. To prevent adhesion of the mixture to the roller, keep the wheels properly moistened but excessive water will not be permitted. In areas not accessible to the roller, the mixture shall be thoroughly compacted with hand tampers. Any mixture that becomes loose and broken, mixed with dirt, contains check-cracking, or is in any way defective shall be removed full depth, replaced with fresh hot mixture and immediately compacted to conform to the surrounding area. This work shall be done at the Contractor's expense. Skin patching will not be allowed.
3.9 JOINTS
The formation of joints shall be performed ensuring a continuous bond between the courses and to obtain the required density. All joints shall have the same texture as other sections of the course and meet the requirements for smoothness and grade.
3.9.1 Transverse Joints
Do not pass the roller over the unprotected end of the freshly laid
SECTION 32 12 16 Page 19 mixture, except when necessary to form a transverse joint. When necessary to form a transverse joint, it shall be made by means of placing a bulkhead or by tapering the course. The tapered edge shall be cut back to its full depth and width on a straight line to expose a vertical face prior to placing material at the joint. Remove the cutback material from the project. In both methods, all contact surfaces shall be given a light tack coat of asphalt material before placing any fresh mixture against the joint.
3.9.2 Longitudinal Joints
Longitudinal joints which are irregular, damaged, uncompacted, cold (less than 175 degrees F at the time of placing adjacent lanes), or otherwise defective, shall be cut back a maximum of 3 inches from the top of the course with a cutting wheel to expose a clean, sound vertical surface for the full depth of the course. All cutback material shall be removed from the project. All contact surfaces shall be given a light tack coat of asphalt material prior to placing any fresh mixture against the joint. The Contractor will be allowed to use an alternate method if it can be demonstrated that density, smoothness, and texture can be met.
3.10 QUALITY CONTROL
3.10.1 General Quality Control Requirements
Develop and submit an approved Quality Control Plan. Submit aggregate and QC test results. Do not produce hot-mix asphalt for payment until the quality control plan has been approved addressing all elements which affect the quality of the pavement including, but not limited to:
a. Mix Design
b. Aggregate Grading
c. Quality of Materials
d. Stockpile Management
e. Proportioning
f. Mixing and Transportation
g. Mixture Volumetrics
h. Moisture Content of Mixtures
i. Placing and Finishing
j. Joints
k. Compaction
l. Surface Smoothness
3.10.2 Testing Laboratory
Provide a fully equipped asphalt laboratory located at the plant or job site and meeting the pertinent requirements in ASTM D3666. Laboratory facilities shall be kept clean and all equipment maintained in proper working condition. The Contracting Officer shall be permitted unrestricted
SECTION 32 12 16 Page 20 access to inspect the Contractor's laboratory facility, to witness quality control activities, and to perform any check testing desired. The Contracting Officer will advise the Contractor in writing of any noted deficiencies concerning the laboratory facility, equipment, supplies, or testing personnel and procedures. When the deficiencies are serious enough to adversely affect test results, the incorporation of the materials into the work shall be suspended immediately and will not be permitted to resume until the deficiencies are corrected.
3.10.3 Quality Control Testing
Perform all quality control tests applicable to these specifications and as set forth in the Quality Control Program. The testing program shall include, but shall not be limited to, tests for the control of asphalt content, aggregate gradation, temperatures, aggregate moisture, moisture in the asphalt mixture, laboratory air voids, stability (NA for Superpave), flow (NA for Superpave), in-place density, grade and smoothness. Develop a Quality Control Testing Plan as part of the Quality Control Program.
3.10.3.1 Asphalt Content
A minimum of two tests to determine asphalt content will be performed per lot (a lot is defined in paragraph MATERIAL ACCEPTANCE and PERCENT PAYMENT) by one of the following methods: the extraction method in accordance with ASTM D2172/D2172M, Method A or B, the ignition method in accordance with ASTM D6307, or the nuclear method in accordance with ASTM D4125/D4125M.
Calibrate the ignition oven or the nuclear gauge for the specific mix being used. For the extraction method, determine the weight of ash, as described in ASTM D2172/D2172M, as part of the first extraction test performed at the beginning of plant production; and as part of every tenth extraction test performed thereafter, for the duration of plant production. The last weight of ash value obtained shall be used in the calculation of the asphalt content for the mixture.
3.10.3.2 Gradation
Determine aggregate gradations a minimum of twice per lot from mechanical analysis of recovered aggregate in accordance with ASTM D5444. When asphalt content is determined by the ignition oven or nuclear method, aggregate gradation shall be determined from hot bin samples on batch plants, or from the cold feed on drum mix plants. For batch plants, test aggregates in accordance with ASTM C136/C136M using actual batch weights to determine the combined aggregate gradation of the mixture.
3.10.3.3 Temperatures
Check temperatures at least four times per lot, at necessary locations, to determine the temperature at the dryer, the asphalt cement in the storage tank, the asphalt mixture at the plant, and the asphalt mixture at the job site.
3.10.3.4 Aggregate Moisture
Determine the moisture content of aggregate used for production a minimum of once per lot in accordance with ASTM C566.
3.10.3.5 Moisture Content of Mixture
Determine the moisture content of the mixture at least once per lot in
SECTION 32 12 16 Page 21 accordance with ASTM D1461 or an approved alternate procedure.
3.10.3.6 Laboratory Air Voids, Marshall Stability and Flow
Take mixture samples at least four times per lot compacted into specimens, using 50 blows per side with the hand-held Marshall hammer as described in ASTM D6926. When the Superpave gyratory compactor is used, mixes will be compacted to 50 gyrations in accordance with ASTM D6925. Hot-mix provided under the DOT Superpave option shall be compacted in accordance with the DOT requirements. After compaction, determine the laboratory air voids of each specimen. Stability and flow shall be determined for the Marshall-compacted specimens, in accordance with ASTM D6927.
3.10.3.7 In-Place Density
Conduct any necessary testing to ensure the specified density is achieved.
A nuclear gauge may be used to monitor pavement density in accordance with
ASTM D2950/D2950M.
3.10.3.8 Grade and Smoothness
Conduct the necessary checks to ensure the grade and smoothness requirements are met in accordance with paragraphs MATERIAL ACCEPTANCE and
PERCENT PAYMENT.
3.10.3.9 Additional Testing
Any additional testing, which the Contractor deems necessary to control the process, may be performed at the Contractor's option.
3.10.3.10 QC Monitoring
Submit all QC test results to the Contracting Officer on a daily basis as the tests are performed. The Contracting Officer reserves the right to monitor any of the Contractor's quality control testing and to perform duplicate testing as a check to the Contractor's quality control testing.
3.10.4 Sampling
When directed by the Contracting Officer, sample and test any material which appears inconsistent with similar material being produced, unless such material is voluntarily removed and replaced or deficiencies corrected by the Contractor. All sampling shall be in accordance with standard procedures specified.
3.10.5 Control Charts
For process control, establish and maintain linear control charts on both individual samples and the running average of last four samples for the parameters listed in Table 8, as a minimum. These control charts shall be posted as directed by the Contracting Officer and kept current at all times. The control charts shall identify the project number, the test parameter being plotted, the individual sample numbers, the Action and Suspension Limits listed in Table 8 applicable to the test parameter being plotted, and the Contractor's test results. Target values from the JMF shall also be shown on the control charts as indicators of central tendency for the cumulative percent passing, asphalt content, and laboratory air voids parameters. When the test results exceed either applicable Action Limit, take immediate steps to bring the process back in control. When the
SECTION 32 12 16 Page 22 test results exceed either applicable Suspension Limit, halt production until the problem is solved. Use the control charts as part of the process control system for identifying trends so that potential problems can be corrected before they occur. Make decisions concerning mix modifications based on analysis of the results provided in the control charts. The Quality Control Plan shall indicate the appropriate action to be taken to bring the process into control when certain parameters exceed their Action Limits.
Table 8. Action and Suspension Limits for the Parameters to be Plotted on Individual and Running Average Control Charts
Individual Samples Running Average of Last Four Samples
Parameter to be Plotted Action Limit
Suspe…
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .