Q&A_for_0002.docx

N68335-17-R-0129 Amendment 0002 Questions and Answers

1. Reference: RFP Section L, Part A, Sec. 3.0, top of pg. 208: “The title and table of contents pages, as well as tables, are not included in the suggested page count.

Question: Do the formal Proposal Cover Letter (requested at Sec. L, Part A, para. 2.1.4) included with the Executive Summary, and an Acronym List we plan to provide (not requested in the RFP) with each volume count against the page limitations?

Answer: The RFP has a suggested number of pages, not a page limit.

2. Reference: RFP, Sec. L, Part A, para. 4.1, pg. 209: “However, it is requested that one paper copy and two electronic copies on a CD-ROM/DVD of Table ES-1 (Offeror’s Summary), Table ES-2 (Relevant Contract Summary); Table PP-1 (Past Performance Contract Data); and Annex B (Final Versions of Previous SOW/PWSs/Other Supporting Documentation for Past Performance) be submitted two weeks prior to the submission date/time specified on Standard Form 33 (Block 9).” However, RFP, Sec. L, Part A, para. 3, pg. 208, Table G-3 indicates that Annex B is only delivered as an electronic file(s). Also, RFP, Sec. L, Part B, para. 3, pg. 219 says, “Annex B should only be provided in electronic format and should not be provided in paper copy.”

Question: Please clarify whether Annex B is delivered early only as an electronic file.

Answer: Yes, Annex B is to be delivered early only as an electronically file.

3. Reference: RFP, Section J Question: “Attachment 11, Data Item Transmittal/Acceptance/Rejection Form” is listed in Section J, and referenced in the RFP, Sec. E, Clause 5252.246-9514. It is not referenced in the SOW (Sec. 4.?) and was not released with the RFP. Do we need this form for our proposal response?

Answer: No, the form is not needed for your proposal response. Section E: The NAVAIR Clause 5252.246-9514 has been modified as the form is not needed. Section J has been modified to delete Attachment 11.

4. Reference: eCASS-TD-0236 Question: The Production Acceptance Test (PAT) procedure as detailed in document number eCASS-TD-0236, specifies that the backup power kits are to be tested as part of PAT. In section C of the SOW, the station configurations show the backup ancillary kit installed in each of the station configurations. Will the Government be providing the ancillary backup power kits as GFE? If the ancillary backup power kit is not to be tested, will the backup power cables installed in the core be part of the PAT?

Answer: Yes, one (1) Power Back-up Ancillary Kit will be provide as GFE after completion of Post Award Conference to support Mfg Planning and Production, and added to Attachment 2 prior to Award. The updated Attachment 2 will be incorporated into the RFP in a future amendment.

5. Reference: Excerpt from SOW paragraph 3.1.6.2, First Article Test, "Award of the contract serves as written authorization that the Contractor may order material per Clause 52.209-3 Alt II, but does not authorize assembly beyond the first two FRP eCASS systems until Government Approval of the FAT Report."

Question: The Final RFP replaced FAR 52.209-3 Alt II First Article Approval-- Contractor Testing from Section I of the model contract with FAR 52.209-4 Alt II, First Article Approval - Government Testing, however the SOW in paragraph 3.1.6.2, First Article Test (FAT) still references clause 52.209-3 Alt II. Will the SOW be updated to reflect 52.209-4 Alt II, First Article Approval - Government Testing?

Answer: Section C, SOW paragraph 3.1.6.2 has been modified to correct the FAR Clause reference from 52.209-3 to 52.209-4.

6. Reference: Industry Day Question / Answers:

Q11. Is there any proprietary software, firmware or hardware in the TDP?

A11. Government maintains CM of the eCASS system software and hardware baseline. The eCASS system software and hardware baseline does contain several COTS products. The government will deliver the latest baseline, including system software at time of award.

Question: The Government indicates in their published answers to Industry Day Question (Q#11) "The eCASS system software and hardware baseline does contain several COTS products. The government will deliver the latest baseline, including system software at time of award." Based on the Government's response, is it the Governments intent to deliver all COTS products (hardware and software) and any related COTS product licenses.

Answer: The government plans to deliver the system SW at time of Award, including required SW Licenses as required. Any HW provided by the government will be listed in Attachments (2) & (3). Attachment 2 will be updated as required and incorporated into the RFP in a future amendment.

7. Reference: FAR 52.217-6, Option for Increased Quantity (MAR 1989) " The Government may increase the quantity of supplies called for in the Schedule at the unit price specified. The Contracting Officer may exercise the option by written notice to the Contractor within 30 days. Delivery of the added items shall continue at the same rate as the like items called for under the contract, unless the parties otherwise agree."

Question: Can the Government provide clarification as to which event starts the 30 day time period (ADC or AOE)?

Answer: Notification to exercise the option must happen within 30 days of executing the modification to exercise the option.

8. Reference: Section I.

Question: The TDP contains many COTS products. There are no patents related to eCASS. Please advise if it was the Government’s intent to remove DFAR 252.227-7000 Non-Estoppel as that clause pertains to the licensing of patents or patent applications?

Answer: The Government does not intend to remove the clause 252.227-7000.

9. Reference: Section B - DFAR 252.211-7003 Question: The TDP released with the RFP package does not reflect UID marking on all of the hardware items associated with the FRP2 CLINs within Section B (i.e. CAL Equipment Kit/Ship Rails). Will the Government be updating the TDP, as required, to reflect the UID marking requirements identified with these CLINs?

Answer: The TDP is correct with regards to required UID labeling for eCASS and consistent with DFARS 252.211-7003.

10. Reference: Attachment 3 - CASS Reuse Items List for eCASS Production Question: The GFE list did not include an EO station in the following 7 part numbers as GFE (1902AS042-07, 2034AS362-01, 2034AS363-01, 2054AS800-2001, 2055AS374-2001, 2055AS476-2001, 2055AS477-2001). How many sets of these GFE will be provided after an award is made?

Answer: Under Attachment (2), the qty one (1) EO Console, P/N 2054AS800-2001, will be provide and will include a complete cable set (1 each - 1902AS042-07, 2034AS362-01, 2034AS363-01, 2055AS374-2001, 2055AS476-2001, and 2055AS477-2001). No additional copies of these 7 assets will be provided as GFE under Attachment (3) or required for delivery under CLINs 0X02.

11. Reference: TDP Package and Section B Question: The TDP does not contain the associated part number and option to bid the genie lift. Can the Government provide the part number and options, along with any other components that must be supplied and assembled with the genie lift to satisfy the requirements of the following CLINs: 0011, 0111, 0211, 0311, 0411 and 0511.

Answer: P/N is 2056AS944-01 (HLU-396/E), which consists of a Genie Lift GL-8 and Modified Boom (now standard according to the supplier).

12. Reference: TDP: 4027AS0842-01 EXTERNAL EQUIPMENT, CAL

4027AS0842-02 EXTERNAL EQUIPMENT, CAL

Question: Can the Government please clarify which TDP part numbers should be used for the eCASS CAL Equipment Kits (CLINS 0010, 0110, 0210, 0310, 0410, and 0510) and for the eCASS CAL Equipment Suites (CLINs 0116, 0216, 0316, 0416, and 0516?

Answer: eCASS CAL Equipment Kits = P/N 4027AS0842-02 and eCASS CAL Equipment Suites = P/N 4027AS0842-01

13. Reference: Table G-3 Proposal Structure Question: Will pages that exceed the suggested page count in table G-3 (Proposal Structure) be evaluated?

Answer: Yes, pages past the suggested page count will be evaluated.

14. Reference: L.4.2 PROPOSAL PACKAGING Question: Where would the Government like the required FAR / DFAR fill-in clauses be located within the proposal?

Answer: The FAR/DFAR fill in clauses such as the reps and certs from Section K, should be included with the Executive Summary.

15. Reference: L.3. PROPOSAL CONTENT AND VOLUMES "The title and table of contents pages, as well as tables, are not included in the suggested page count" Question: Can the Govt clarify which tables are excluded from the suggested page count?

Answer: Any tables required by the solicitation.