RFI Log_Airfield Paving MACC 9.26.23.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 29 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- N62473-23-R-0408
About this file
This document contains a request for information log and related federal contract opportunity solicitation. The request for information log details correspondence between an agency and bidders seeking clarification on various aspects of an indefinite delivery indefinite quantity multiple award construction contract solicitation. The solicitation seeks proposals for new construction, repair, and renovation of airfield paving and heavy duty paving projects at various government installations within the Naval Facilities Engineering Command. Offerors are to submit proposals electronically using the Department of Defense Solicitation Module by various amendment deadlines. The total contract value is $495,000,000 over the life of the basic contract, though no specific scope of work is associated with this total. Clarification was provided on methodology for small business participation commitments and use of total contract value in related forms.
View the file
Other files
Show all 44
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
RFI (pre-award) Form_For KTR
SOLICITATION:N62473-23-R-0408
Airfield Paving MACC
| TO BE FILLED OUT BY THE BIDDING KTR | TO BE FILLED OUT BY THE GOV'T | |||||||||||
| RFI # | RFP Part # | Chapter or Section | Sub-Section # | CLARIFICATION REQUEST | RFI reason from KTR's Perspective | Comment [fill out if "Other" was chosen, specify reason(s)] | RFI Topic most closely relevant to: | Government Response | DATE RECEIVED | DATE TO KTR | Amendment Number | |
| 1 | Per the Solicitation Page 6 - Proposal Submittal Requirements Tab 6 - Factor 6 Price, price is based on Proposed Task Order 0001. The Solicitation also references price based on Proposed Task Order 0001 on Page 13 - Item 4 Evaluation Factors - Factor 6, Price and Page 22 - Factor 6: Price - Based on PTO 0001. Please confirm that supporting documents will be provided for PTO 0001 for Offerors to be able to provide pricing as stipulated per the solicitation. | Confirmed. See Amendment 0001. | 9.12.23 | 9.26.23 | Amendment 0001 | |||||||
| 2 | 00 10 00 - Solicitation | Item No 0002 | Please provide drawings and specifications for the referenced project under Schedule of Pricing Item No. 0002 (Repair Flightline Apron at Naval Air Station Point Mugu, Naval Base Ventura County, CA). | No drawings or specifications included in bid documents for bid item 0002. | See Amendment 0001 | 9.18.23 | 9.26.23 | Amendment 0001 | ||||
| 3 | Section | |||||||||||
| 00 10 00 | RFP references Proposed Task Order (PTO) 0001 but there are no documents relating to the PTO 0001. | Attachments are referenced but missing/not provided | Other/Unsure | See Amendment 0001 | 9.18.23 | 9.26.23 | Amendment 0001 | |||||
| 4 | Section | |||||||||||
| 00 21 16 | 3. Pre-Proposal Conference | RFP references A list of Frequently-Asked-Questions (FAQ) This document isn't one of the files available on SAM.gov. | Attachments are referenced but missing/not provided | Other/Unsure | Amendment 0002 is forthcoming and will include the FAQ as an attachment. | 9.18.23 | 9.26.23 | Amendment 0002 is forthcoming | ||||
| 5 | Section | |||||||||||
| 00 21 16 | 2. Proposal Submittal Requirements | RFP states "Proposals shall be submitted electronically using the Department of Defense (DoD) Solicitation Module in the Procurement Integrated Enterprise Environment (PIEE)." |
Currently, this solicitation isn't in PIEE.
| Will it be added to PIEE for proposal submittal? | Conflicting Information | Other/Unsure | See Amendment 0001 for updates to Instruction to Proposers. | 9.18.23 | 9.26.23 | Amendment 0001 | |
| 6 | Section | ||||||
| 00 21 16 | 1. Inquiries | RFP states "The Government does not intend to respond to inquiries submitted less than 10 days before the proposal receipt date." |
| Please clarify calendar days or business days. | Intent needs clarification | Other/Unsure | days = Calendar days | 9.18.23 | 9.26.23 | ||||||
| 7 | Factor 6 is the price proposal for PTO 0001. We do not find any documents related to PTO 00001, plans or specifications on the sam.gov site. When and how will documents for PTO 00001 made available for review? | Amendment 0001 was posted to SAM.gov on September 19, 2023. | 9.18.23 | 9.26.23 | Amendment 0001 | ||||||
| 8 | Part 1 | Pricing Item 0002 is requesting a hard bid for "Repair Flightline Apron at Naval Air Station Point Mugu, Naval Base Ventura County, CA", however plans and specs have not been provided with the RFP. | Attachments are referenced but missing/not provided | Contracting | Plans and Specs have been provided in Amendment 0001. | 9.22.23 | 9.26.23 | ||||
| 9 | Part 4 | The techncial approach submission specifies a narrative regarding contract rational between primary contractor and primary design firm. The current and past versions of this MACC have been base buid build, is the intent for this contract to be design build in nature? | Conflicting Information | Changed to: |
FACTOR 1: TECHNICAL APPROACH, paragraph a. Solicitation Submittal Requirements, sub-paragraph (1)
| Using Exhibit “A” (Offeror Team Composition and Management), provide a technical approach narrative describing the proposed primary construction firm(s) for this contract and the rationale for proposing this arrangement. Provide the role, responsibilities, and contractual relationships between the various firms (see FAR Subpart 9.6). The technical approach narrative (Exhibit “A”) shall be limited to one (1) double-sided page (or two (2) single-sided pages), excluding the organizational chart. The information requested in item (2) below is not included in this page limitation. | 9.22.23 | 9.26.23 | Amendment 0002 is forthcoming | |
| 10 | Re: Offeror's Team Consent Form(s): |
Page 5 of 126 of the Solicitation, Section 00 21 16 - Instructions to Proposers, Item 2. PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS states “In addition to the cover letter, the Offeror shall submit an Offeror's Team Consent Form for each major subcontractor/teaming partner (e.g., team member, subcon-tractor (i.e., Lead Design Firm(s)), parent company, subsidiary, or other affiliated company, etc.) identified in the Offeror's proposal.”
| I could not locate this form either as an attachment for download or as part of the Solicitation document. Can you please provide a copy of this form? | Attachments are referenced but missing/not provided | Amendment 0002 is forthcoming and will include the Offeror's Team Consent Form as an attachment. | 9.22.23 | 9.26.23 | Amendment 0002 is forthcoming |
| 11 | Re: Separate PDF file for Tab 6: |
Page 6 of 126 of the Solicitation, Section 00 21 16 - Instructions to Proposers, Item 2. PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS / “Instructions for electronic submission of proposals are provided below” states “Proposals shall be submitted electronically using the Department of Defense (DoD) Solicitation Module in the Procurement Integrated Enterprise Environment (PIEE) located at https://piee.eb.mil/. Offerors are instructed to electronically submit their complete proposal in one (1) single file, formatted in Port-able Document Format (PDF) with a .pdf file extension.”
Page 22 of 126 of the Solicitation, Section 00 21 16 - Instructions to Proposers / BASIS OF AWARD AND EVALUATION FACTORS / 4. EVALUATION FACTORS / FACTOR 6: PRICE - Based on PTO 0001 / “a. Solicitation Submittal Requirements” states “The Offeror (see definition) shall complete and submit the following in the order shown as one (1) complete separate PDF file.
> SF 1442 (Solicitation, Offer and Award) > Bid Bond (in the amount of 20% of the proposal price for PTO 0001 or $495,000,000, whichever is less)”
| The request for a separate PDF file for the contents of Tab 6 appears to be in conflict with the instruction for offerors to submit their “complete proposal in one (1) single file.” Please advise whether we can include the contents of Tab 6 within the single PDF which will be submitted via the PIEE. | Conflicting Information | Contracting | Please refer to Amendment 0001, paragraph 1 " 1. To revise Section 00 21 16 – Instruction to Proposers" for revised instructiions to proposers. | 9.22.23 | 9.26.23 |
| 12 | Re: Methodology for Exhibit F: |
Exhibit F - SMALL BUSINESS PARTICIPATION COMMITMENT DOCUMENT (SBPCD): Item “3. Subcontracting Breakdown” asks offerors to state:
> the “Total contract value (TCV)” > the “Total value of the work to be self-performed by the prime offeror” and > the “Total value of work to be subcontracted”
Item “4. Small Business Participation” asks offerors to “Complete the participation table below with dollars and % of total contract value to be subcontracted.”
| Does the TCV described on this form represent the total contract value of $495,000,000 or is it intended to represent the offeror’s amount for Line Item 0002 of Section 00010 Solicitation for PTO 0001? | Intent needs clarification | Total contract value of $495,000,000 is the maximum dollar value for the life of the basic contract. There is no scope associated with this total contract value. | 9.22.23 | 9.26.23 | ||||
| 13 | Re: Methodology for Exhibit F - continued: | |||||||
| If the TCV on the form is intended to represent the total contract value of $495,000,000, what scope of work should offerors use to base their responses on? | Intent needs clarification | See response to RFI #12 | 9.22.23 | 9.26.23 | ||||
| 14 | After downloading the documents posted on SAM.GOV we noticed that we are unable to bookmark or copy text from the documents furnished in PDF format, as we typically would when structuring our pursuit-related documents. Perhaps the versions uploaded were scanned documents? Can you please provide me with or upload the original PDF versions of the files? | Yes, reposting original solicitation (SF 1442) with Amendment 0002. | 9.21.23 | 9.26.23 | Amendment 0002 is forthcoming |
Drop Down List
| RFI Topic Relevant to: | RFP Part # | RFI Reason (for QA) - from KTR perspecrive |
| Architectural-related | Part 1 | Outdated Reference |
| Civil Engineering | Part 2 | Conflicting Information |
| Contracting | Part 3 | Attachments are referenced but missing/not provided |
| Electrical Engineering | Part 4 | Intent needs clarification |
| Environmental | Part 5 | Typo |
| Fire Protection | Part 6 | Other; Please specify in the next column |
| Geotechnical Engineering | If "Others" - include info under Column E Clarification Request | |
| Interior Design | ||
| Landscape | ||
| Mechanical Engineering | ||
| Structural Engineering | ||
| Other/Unsure | ||
| SCIF/SAPF | ||
| Crane | ||
| Elevators | ||
| ATFP |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .