B195 Amendment 0008.pdf

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment your desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable)

7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

FACILITY CODE

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION

NO.

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended, is not extended.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required) copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

13. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO MODIFICATION OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER NO.

IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15C. DATE SIGNED

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

PAGE OF PAGES

6. ISSUED BY CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X)

CODE

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

NSN 7540-01-152-8070

Previous edition unusable

N4008525R2674

Section SF 30 – Block 14 continuation page (SF 30)

The following have been added by full text:

AMENDMENT 0008

This amendment is issued to incorporate the following:

1. Provide Responses to Pre-Proposal Inquiries

2. Provide Attachment P – Revised Price Proposal Form V3

1. Provide Responses to Pre-Proposal Inquiries

PPI Reference Question Response Page Section Paragraph

1 01 14 00.00 1.2.1 The Contractor's Quality Control (QC) or Competent Person (CP) shall be trained and knowledgeable in radiation safety.

Please advise on the level of training required, recommended courses, number of hours, etc? Are trade partners, superintendents, SSHO's, competent persons, required to have the same training?

No radiation sources indicative of unacceptable risks were identified in the HazMat survey. The Subcontractor performing radiological survey would be required to receive radiological survey training. Superintendents, SSHO would not require the same level of training and administering company of the radiological survey.

1 011400.00 22 1.2.1 Please verify that the QC or CP will need to be trained in radiation safety. If so, please provide the level of radiation exposure that contractors may encounter for this project.

No radiation sources indicative of unacceptable risks were identified in the HazMat survey. Only contractor performing radiological work would require radiation training.

1 011400.00 22 1.2.1 If the construction activates expose contractors to radiation for this project, please provide the levels of radiation expected so the contractor may include the proper safety requirements.

No radiation sources indicative of unacceptable risks were identified in the HazMat survey.

7 Part 3 Chapter

F2020 1.1 Please provide the qualifications required for the private qualified person.

PQP must be able to perform independent inspections, testing and verification of hazardous components included in ESR F20 and the approved work plans as described in 01 57 19.00 22.

7 Part 3 Chapter

F2020 1.1 Please verify that the private qualified person will need to be on-site the entire duration that hazardous material removal is taking place.

The private qualified person (PQP) should be onsite for all hazardous material removal.

Hazardous Material

Please provide the classification of waste that is to be removed in the tanks.

Refer to PPI 57 (Amendment 0006) for past contents. KTR responsible for testing contents of tanks and managing disposal.

It’s our understanding the Building 195 site is regulated by an EPA Record of Decision (ROD) that describes the environmental remedy as Land Use Controls (LUCs). Can the Government describe the coordination that will be required with the EPA, Virginia DEQ and or NNSY to demolish Building 195?

Yes, the area around Building 195 (IR Site 17) has LUCs in place.

Coordination will be required with EPA and VDEQ in order to maintain compliance with the LUCs that are in place, specifically preventing unrestricted exposure to contaminated soils. EPA and VDEQ have requested a soil management plan to be created and reviewed by both organizations.

This soil management plan must explain how the project intends to comply with this LUC and prevent the spread of contaminated soils. Per the shipyard’s Federal Facilities Agreement (FFA) the regulatory agencies have 60 days for review followed by an RTC period of 60 days. To be clear, this is specific to contaminated soils and would not prevent work from occurring inside of the building, unless that work exposes contaminated soils.

Sites 10 and 17 LUC:

prevent residential or childcare use until site conditions allow for unlimited use and unrestricted exposure to surface and subsurface soil.

Site 17 LUC: prohibit unrestricted exposure to contaminated soil.

Will the Contractor be required to prepare any specific remediation documents requiring approval by the EPA, Virginia DEQ and or NNSY? Is so, can the Government provide a description of the anticipated documents.

Please see PPI number 91.

Yes, a soil management plan has been requested by the EPA and VDEQ.

Is Building 195 included in or managed by any other environmental restoration programs? If so, can the Government please provide all Environmental Investigations, Remedial Investigation reports, Risk Assessments, Records of Decision (RODs), etc. associated with the site?

No, the Navy’s ERN program is the only environmental restoration program associated with this site. However, the Navy does have all publicly available documents posted on the shipyard’s ERN website and administrative record, see links below.

https://www.navfac.navy.

mil/Divisions/Environmen tal/Products-and- Services/Environmental- Restoration/Mid- Atlantic/Norfolk-NSY/ https://administrative-records.navfac.navy.mil/?

T4U3_UQRG4WZGTU3

VWGY7S

N/A N/A N/A Please advise if "Hazwhoper" certifications are required for this project due to the exposure risk to contaminated groundwater and soils. The RFP currently does not required this certification. If the certification is required please advise on the level, # of hours, of Hazwhoper certification is required and who is required to carry the certification, everyone with exposure risk, or competent person only.

OSHA 1910.120(a)(1)(i) states the following:

Clean-up operations required by a governmental body, whether Federal, state, local or other involving hazardous substances that are conducted at uncontrolled hazardous waste sites (including, but not limited to, the EPA's National Priority Site List (NPL), state priority site lists, sites recommended for the EPA NPL, and initial investigations of government identified sites which are conducted before the presence or absence of hazardous substances has been ascertained)

Therefore, yes, a HAZWOPER certification is required to work within the site. The CP only needs the Hazwhoper cert.

CP manages those with exposure.

2. Provide Attachment P – Revised Price Proposal Form V3 (attached separately)

Amendment 0001 continuation page

SEE SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

Contract POC: Jator de Leon, jator.v.deleon.civ@us.navy.mil

CONTRACTING CORE

9324 VIRGINIA AVENUE

NORFOLK, VA 23511-3095