R

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended. is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER

NUMBER IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print) 16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

16C. DATE SIGNED

Previous edition unusable STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016) Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUISITION NUMBER 5. PROJECT NUMBER (If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBE

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

CODE FACILITY CODE

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

Block 14 (Description of Amendment/Modification): The purpose of this amendment is to update the RFP to incorporate MCPP support in Australia and Palau. Summary of Changes are as follows:

Section B: Moved MCPP Australia and MCPP Palau from CLIN X004 (OLS) to CLIN X003 (OCONUS).

Section E-1(c)(4): Added "and Ashore Prepositioning Sites."

Section L-1: Replaced instructions to Offerors regarding submission of questions. Link to submit questions: https://forms.osi.apps.mil/r/hdwUasGhwr Attachment J-4 (DD Form 254): Updated Blocks 8 and 9.

Attachment J-5 (SOW): Added Australia and Palau requirements throughout SOW; see Sections 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, and 10.

Attachment J-7 (Cost Model Workbook): Added Australia and Palau in the drop down in Column F for Tabs CLIN X003 and X003 OT. Updated Government plug numbers in Column C for CLIN X004.

Attachment S-2 (Notional Manning Document): Updated CLIN X003 to include Notional Manning and Hours for Australia and Palau.

Section J (Exhibit A CDRL Listing by CLIN): Updated Exhibits A-3 and A-4 to include CLINs X001, X002, and X003 in Block A. Added new DD Form 1423 Exhibit A-13 for MCPP Australia & MCPP Palau.

Exhibits A-3 & A-4: Updated Block A to include CLINs X001, X002, and X003.

Exhibit A-13: Added new DD Form 1423 for MCPP Australia & MCPP Palau.

Section B - Supplies or Services & Prices or Costs

The following CLIN(s) / SLIN(s) / ELIN(s) were modified:

INFORMATION FROM TO CHANGED BY

Quantity 1,332,965 2,829,845 +1,496,880

INFORMATION FROM TO CHANGED BY

Description

Other Logistics SupportBase Ordering Period - The MCMC shall provide Contingency /Exercise/Emerging Requirements support in accordance with Sections C.6, C.7, C.8, and C.11 of the Statement of Work.CPFF Level of Effort IAW FAR 16. 304- 3(b)Overtime Premium shall not be subject to fee.Contingency /Exercise/Emerging Requirements Fixed Fee will be determined upon authorization of work in accordance with Section H-8.3:

The same ratio of fee awarded in the initial contract award will be used in any task orders issued.

Pricing Arrangement: Cost Plus Fixed FeeSee Notes 2(c),(d),(e).

RFP NOTE: The estimated CLIN amount is $73.6M in accordance with the Cost Model Workbook.

This CLIN is subject to fee (which shall be proposed). Labor Categories and LOE will be determined at the Task Order level.

Other Logistics SupportBase Ordering Period - The MCMC shall provide Contingency /Exercise/Emerging Requirements support in accordance with Sections C.6, C.7, C.8, and C.11 of the Statement of Work.CPFF Level of Effort IAW FAR 16. 304- 3(b)Overtime Premium shall not be subject to fee.Contingency /Exercise/Emerging Requirements Fixed Fee will be determined upon authorization of work in accordance with Section H-8.3:

The same ratio of fee awarded in the initial contract award will be used in any task orders issued.

Pricing Arrangement: Cost Plus Fixed FeeSee Notes 2(c),(d),(e).

RFP NOTE: The estimated CLIN amount is $9.8M in accordance with the Cost Model Workbook.

This CLIN is subject to fee (which shall be proposed). Labor Categories and LOE will be determined at the Task Order level.

Quantity 73,687,116 9,802,285 -63,884,831

Option Line Item 1003

INFORMATION FROM TO CHANGED BY

Quantity 1,332,965 2,829,845 +1,496,880

Option Line Item 1004

INFORMATION FROM TO CHANGED BY

Other Logistics SupportOption Other Logistics SupportOption

M6700426R00070001

Description

Ordering Period - The MCMC shall provide Contingency /Exercise/Emerging Requirements support in accordance with Sections C.6, C.7, C.8, and C.11 of the Statement of Work.CPFF Level of Effort IAW FAR 16. 304- 3(b)Overtime Premium shall not be subject to fee.Contingency /Exercise/Emerging Requirements Fixed Fee will be determined upon authorization of work in accordance with Section H-8.3:

"The same ratio of fee awarded in the initial contract award will be used in any task orders issued.

Pricing Arrangement: Cost Plus Fixed FeeSee Notes 2(c),(d),(e).

RFP NOTE: The estimated CLIN amount is $105.6M in accordance with the Cost Model Workbook.

This CLIN is subject to fee (which shall be proposed). Labor Categories and LOE will be determined at the Task Order level.

Ordering Period - The MCMC shall provide Contingency /Exercise/Emerging Requirements support in accordance with Sections C.6, C.7, C.8, and C.11 of the Statement of Work.CPFF Level of Effort IAW FAR 16. 304- 3(b)Overtime Premium shall not be subject to fee.Contingency /Exercise/Emerging Requirements Fixed Fee will be determined upon authorization of work in accordance with Section H-8.3:

"The same ratio of fee awarded in the initial contract award will be used in any task orders issued.

Pricing Arrangement: Cost Plus Fixed FeeSee Notes 2(c),(d),(e).

RFP NOTE: The estimated CLIN amount is $11.3M in accordance with the Cost Model Workbook.

This CLIN is subject to fee (which shall be proposed). Labor Categories and LOE will be determined at the Task Order level.

Quantity 105,600,523 11,308,480 -94,292,043

Section E - Inspection and Acceptance

Miscellaneous text in this section has been modified to:

E-1 INSPECTION/MONITORING OF PERFORMANCE

(a) Inspection and monitoring of services performed under this contract will be conducted to verify accomplishment of work in compliance with the Statement of Work and all applicable publications, adherence to established MCMC processes, to determine timeliness of actions taken, and to ascertain quality of the efforts. The goal of contract performance and the inspections is to attain 100% of required supplies and equipment, maintain them at 100% fully mission capable status and to ensure 100% data accuracy is achieved at the levels described in the SOW. Technical standards for maintenance preservation and inspection will be those contained in the SOW and equipment technical manuals.

(b) In addition to inspection and monitoring by the Government, inspection and monitoring of services shall be performed by the MCMC in accordance with his approved quality control plan. The MCMC's Quality Control Plan must align with the BICmd Risk and Performance Manual (CmdO P5000.11) to comply with ISO Joint Certification requirements. Documentation associated with MCMC Quality Control shall be available to Government Quality Assurance (QA) personnel upon request. The MCMC shall use the Government provided Quality Management Support System, to document all MCMC inspection and monitoring of services as identified in the approved quality control plan.

(c) Inspection and monitoring of services under this contract may be accomplished by any of the following Government personnel:

(1) The Contracting Officer and/or assigned Contracting Officer's Representative (COR).

(2) Quality Assurance Representatives (QAR) personnel responsible for the inspection and monitoring of equipment, supplies, or processes.

(3) Personnel who inspect equipment as an adjunct to their primary task of equipment employment.

(4) Cognizant personnel at Marine Corps Logistics Command and Blount Island Command charged with the responsibility for the MPS Program, MCPP-N, MCPP-PHIL and Ashore Prepositioning Sites.

(d) Government personnel will inspect and monitor through:

(1) Examination and employment of equipment and supplies,

(2) Reviewing records of maintenance actions taken,

(3) Reviewing written reports from the MCMC

(4) Reviewing the maintenance, supply or other Government approved records, and

(5) Monitoring established MCMC processes.

(e) The extent of Government Verification inspection will be determined by the Government. Such inspections will normally not exceed the definitive quality assurance requirements established in the SOW, specifications, and/or contract; however, the Government reserves the right to perform any amount of inspection (including 100% inspection), when it determines such inspection is warranted.

(f) At the option of the Government, Government inspection may be performed concurrently with the MCMC, or independently on samples selected by the Government representative. When independent Government inspection is performed, the MCMC shall ensure that adequate test equipment is available to perform the inspection.

(g) Inspection or monitoring by the Government may be accomplished at any time convenient to the Government.

(h) All MCMC generated quality records shall be available for review by Government personnel via QMSS at all times.

(i) Discrepancies noted by any of the above personnel will be brought to the attention of the MCMC. All official notification of discrepancies shall be in writing from either the Contracting Officer, COR, or personnel duly assigned by the Contracting Officer. Any official notice of unsatisfactory performance shall be in writing from the Contracting Officer.

(j) In addition to the foregoing inspections, inspection of the methods of performing the services under this contract may be performed by the Master or Officers of a prepositioning ship to assure conformance with applicable maritime laws, rules, and regulations relating to the performance of such activities on board ships and to ensure the general safety and sea-worthiness of the ship. Any shipboard MCMC activity or condition found by the Master of a ship to be in violation of, or not in consonance with, any of the foregoing may be brought to the attention of the COR by the Master of the vessel or one of her Officers on his behalf. If the activity or condition is not discontinued or corrected as directed by the Master within such time period and in such manner as shall be acceptable to the Master, the Master may issue a written notice to the COR with a copy to the MCMC; such notice may be the basis of removal from the vessel as expeditiously as possible of the employee(s) responsible for the failure to comply with the Master's instructions.

(k) Differences in interpretation of technical issues or the inspection reports will be brought to the attention of the COR for resolution. Issues not resolved at this level will be forwarded to the Contracting Officer for final determination.

(l) The Government reserves the right to participate in MCMC ISO 9001:2015 internal audits or perform independent ISO 9001:2015 external audits.

E-2 ACCEPTANCE

Place of acceptance is Blount Island, Jacksonville, Florida unless other is designated on the individual task order. No written acceptance document is required. Certification of invoices for payment shall be considered acceptance of services and supplies delivered unless a formal notice of unsatisfactory performance has been issued in accordance with paragraph E-l, (i) above.

Section J - List of Attachments

The following attachments were added:

Section J. Exh A - CDRLs List by CLIN - Amendment 1

The following attachments were deleted:

Section J. Exhibit A - CDRLs List by CLIN

Section L - Instructions, Conditions, & Notices to Offerors or Quoters

Miscellaneous text in this section has been modified to:

L-1 PREPROPOSAL INFORMATION

All questions or requests for clarification must be submitted using the designated link below and are due no later than thirty (30) business days after issuance of this Request for Proposal (RFP). After this date, offerors are encouraged to keep submitting questions, however questions received after this date may not be answered. Responses will be issued in writing to all prospective Offerors. The Government reserves the right to choose which questions will be answered; all answered questions will be published in PIEE.

Link to submit questions: https://forms.osi.apps.mil/r/hdwUasGhwr

None of the regulations, manuals, technical orders, or other publications referenced in the RFP (herein referred to as the "Program Data and Technical Library") will be issued with the solicitation. All documents referenced in the SOW (i.e., Attachment J-9), not otherwise available to the public, will be provided upon request. Offerors must submit a request to obtain an electronic copy of the Program Data and Technical Library (RFP Attachment #S-1). A completed Non-Disclosure Agreement (RFP Attachment #S-4) must be executed prior to issuance of the Program Data and Technical Library. Only one Program Data and Technical Library is permitted per Offeror (Prime Contractors only); Offerors are responsible for forwarding Non-Disclosure Agreements for joint venture entities and/or subcontractors prior to disseminating the Program Data and Technical Library. Requests must be submitted via e-mail to timothy.l.rivers@usmc.mil no later than thirty (30) business days after the issuance of this RFP. Offerors must ensure that Program Data and Technical Library information is requested in a timely manner to permit adequate proposal development. The Government intends to deliver Program Data and Technical Library media to Offerors by USPS or FedEx overnight delivery, return receipt required. Please note information provided is "Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)".

At proposal submission, the Offeror shall possess a SECRET facility security clearance to assume contract tasks and responsibilities. If an Offeror does not have this type of clearance at the time of proposal submission, the proposal will NOT be evaluated and is not eligible for award. The Government will NOT sponsor Offerors for facility clearances.

Proprietary information submitted in response to this solicitation shall be clearly marked as such and will be protected from unauthorized disclosure as required by Subsection 27 of the Office of Procurement Policy Act as amended (41 U.S.C.423) as implemented in the FAR. Any unmarked information, which may include proprietary information, will be considered releasable under the restrictions of the Freedom of Information Act.

Funds are not presently available for this effort. No award will be made until funds are available. The Government reserves the right to cancel this solicitation, either before or after the closing date. In the event the Government cancels this solicitation, the Government has no obligation to reimburse any Offeror for any costs incurred in the development of the proposal.

The Government intends to incorporate RFP Attachment #J-7 Cost Model Workbook into this contract, and may incorporate other parts into this contract, by reference or full text, portions of the successful Offeror's proposal submitted in response to this solicitation as revised and supplemented through the final proposal revision. Offerors are advised that any features or technical offerings that exceed SOW requirements and are accepted by the Government may be incorporated as a requirement in the resultant contract.

L-2 NOTICE OF ORGANIZATIONAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST (OCI) AVOIDANCE FAR 9.5

The Offeror's attention is directed to Section H, Paragraph H-16 relating to OCI.

L-3 (RESERVED)

L-4 PROPOSAL PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS (ITO)

1. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

The instructions in this section prescribe the format of proposals and describe the approach for the development and presentation of the proposed data.

The proposal shall include all of the information requested in the specific instructions. The Offeror's initial proposal should contain the Offerors best terms from a management, technical and cost/price standpoint. Failure to include all information requested may adversely affect the evaluation or may cause the proposal to be rejected. A proposal that merely reiterates or promises to accomplish the requirements of the SOW will be considered unacceptable. In addition, Offerors shall assume that the Government has no prior knowledge of their experience and will base its evaluation on the information presented in the Offeror's proposal and other obtained Past Performance Information (PPI). A proposal that is orderly and sufficiently documented will enable the Government to easily understand and perform a thorough and fair evaluation.

This section provides general guidance for preparing proposals as well as specific instructions on the format and content of the proposal. Each volume shall be complete in itself. Unless otherwise specified, any form of presentation, such as narrative, pictures, tables, graphs, schematics, logic and other functional block diagrams may be used to provide a concise description of information. The construction of each volume shall be separate and independent; each volume must stand on its own and therefore not require extensive searching throughout the document(s) to locate and evaluate each any items or area being evaluated.

2. ESTIMATED PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE FOR PROPOSAL PREPARATION

M6700426R00070001 https://forms.osi.apps.mil/r/hdwUasGhwr

This solicitation covers a base ordering period of 60 months and one 60-month optional ordering period IAW DFARS 217.201-270(a)(2) and FAR 52.217-9.

Anticipated award date is on or about 4 June 2027. The contractor shall complete all phase in transition activities within the first 90 days following contract award. The Base Ordering Period will begin on the date of award and will continue for a period of five years. Option 1 consists of an additional five year ordering period, which may be exercised in accordance with FAR 52.217-9.

3. PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL INSTRUCTIONS

(a) Proposals shall be submitted electronically via the Procurement Integrated Enterprise Environment Capabilities (PIEE) Solicitation Module to Timothy L. Rivers (timothy.l.rivers@usmc.mil).

Vendor Registration Guide for Contractors: https://cac.piee.eb.mil/xhtml/unauth/web/homepage/vendorGettingStartedHelp.xhtml

PIEE Solicitation Web Based Training:

https://pieetraining.eb.mil/wbt/xhtml/wbt/sol/index.xhtml

(b) Proposal Due Date and Time - The time and date for receipt of offers is stated in Block 9 of the SF 33. The Offeror must complete the submission of its proposal in the PIEE Solicitation Module by this due date and time to be evaluated. Initial proposals and any modifications thereto must be submitted on or before the closing date and time cited in Block 9 of the SF 33. Late submissions will not be considered for evaluation unless the conditions of FAR 15.107(b) apply.

(c) The maximum allowable file size for the PIEE Solicitation Module is , with no limit on the number of files. It is the Offerors1.9 GB per file responsibility to ensure their proposal documents are submitted within the file size limits, in the correct format to be accepted by the system.

4. PROPOSAL ORGANIZATION

A complete proposal is defined as one consisting of eight (8) separate volumes within the required page count, in the number of copies below. Strict compliance with these proposal preparation instructions will be considered in the evaluation of the proposal. Evaluators will read only up to the maximum number of pages specified. Pages in excess of the maximum will be removed from the proposal and not evaluated.

4.1 Matrix Table

Volu me Section L Number / Title / Page Limit

I

Section 5: VOLUME I

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Overview - 10 Pages

Master Table of Contents (all Volumes) - Unlimited

Standard Proposal Information: Unlimited

Table of Contents

List of Tables and Figures

Glossary of Abbreviations & Acronyms

Note: Additionally, one copy of the Executive Summary Overview shall be included in all volumes.

II

Section 6: VOLUME II

MANAGEMENT PROPOSAL

Standard Proposal Information: Unlimited

Table of Contents

List of Tables and Figures

Glossary of Abbreviations & Acronyms

Management - 40 pages

III

Section 7: VOLUME III

TECHNICAL PROPOSAL - USMC

Standard Proposal Information: Unlimited

Table of Contents

List of Tables and Figures

Glossary of Abbreviations & Acronyms

USMC Technical Methodology - 50 pages

IV

Section 8: VOLUME IV

TECHNICAL PROPOSAL - NAVY

Standard Proposal Information: Unlimited

Table of Contents

List of Tables and Figures

Glossary of Abbreviations & Acronyms

Navy Technical Methodology - 50 pages

V

Section 9: VOLUME V

PAST PERFORMANCE

Standard Proposal Information: Unlimited

Table of Contents

List of Tables and Figures

Glossary of Abbreviations & Acronyms

Section 9.1: Past Performance Information - 10 pages

Section 9.2: Past Performance Questionnaire and CPARS - Unlimited

VI

Section 10: VOLUME VI

COST/PRICE PROPOSAL

Section 10.1: Standard Proposal Information: -Unlimited

Table of Contents

List of Tables and Figures

Glossary of Abbreviations & Acronyms

Section 10.2: Costs -Unlimited

Section 10.3: Summary Descriptions & Narrative -Unlimited

Section 10.4: Cost Breakout & Supporting Data by COST TYPE CLIN and Utilizing the Cost Model Workbook (RFP Attachment J-7) - Unlimited

Section 10.5: Other Information - Unlimited

Section 11: VOLUME VII

VII

SMALL BUSINESS PARTICIPATION AND SUBCONTRACTING PLAN

Standard Proposal Information: Unlimited

Table of Contents

List of Tables and Figures

Glossary of Abbreviations & Acronyms

Section 11.1: Small Business Participation - 5 pages

Section 11.2: Small Business Subcontracting Plan - Unlimited

VIII

Section 12: VOLUME VIII

PROPOSAL DOCUMENTATION

Standard Proposal Information: -Unlimited

Table of Contents

List of Tables and Figures

Glossary of Abbreviations & Acronyms

Section 12.1: Solicitation Submission -Unlimited

Sections 12.1.1 and 14.1: Required Documents -Unlimited

Section 12.1.2: Exceptions to Terms and Conditions -Unlimited

4.2 Proposal Format

4.2.1 Guidance

(a) This section of the Instructions to Offerors (ITO) provides general guidance for preparing proposals as well as specific instructions on the format and content of the proposal.

(b) The Offeror's proposal must include all data and information requested by the ITO and must be submitted in accordance with these instructions.

4.2.2 Price/Cost Information

All cost or pricing information shall be addressed ONLY in Volume VI, Cost/Price Proposal. Cost proposal information shall be provided in the format contained in paragraph 10. Both Adobe Acrobat (.pdf) and Excel (.xlsx) files should be used for respective documents.

4.2.3 No Cross-Referencing

(a) Each volume shall be written on a standalone basis so that its contents may be evaluated without cross-referencing to other volumes of the proposal.

(b) The Organizational Chart / Manning Document required in the Volume I - Executive Summary Overview shall be provided in a Microsoft excel format and provide a cross reference to all CLINs; Offerors shall identify full time equivalents (FTEs) that support multiple CLINs and the level of support they provide to each CLIN. Offerors shall include manning level and associated LOE hours in the Cost Template (RFP Attachment #J-7 Cost Model Workbook), specifically, the Labor Categories and Level of Effort required by Labor Category. The Offeror's proposed Organizational Structure must be consistent with the proposed Cost Model Workbook.

(c) The Notional Organizational Structure (RFP Attachment #S-2) will guide the development of the management, technical, and cost proposals (Volumes II, III, IV, and VI). Note: Total hours displayed on RFP Attachment #S-2 are total ANNUAL hours. The Notional Organizational Structure is presented at the department level. The offeror shall provide their organizational chart at the most granular level possible (Branch/Section).

The Labor Categories within the Notional Organizational Structure reference various experience levels. Where "Various Experience Levels" are listed next to the labor category, the Offeror should design its structure to capture the range of experience levels the Offeror determines appropriate. As an example, "Material Spec" has multiple skill levels in the CBA (RFP Attachment #J-3); Material Spec I, Material Spec II, Material Spec III, etc. The Offeror may utilize any combination of those Labor Categories to meet the minimum level of effort hours.

(d) The proposed Organizational Chart / Manning Document required in the Executive Summary (Volume I) will not count towards individual volume page limitations.

(e) Offerors shall not include cost and/or pricing information in proposal volumes other than the Cost/Price Volume.

(f) Information required for proposal evaluation that is not found in its designated volume, will be assumed to have been omitted from the proposal.

4.2.4 Table of Contents

(a) Each volume shall contain detailed Table of Contents to delineate the subparagraphs within that volume. Pages of the Offeror's proposal will be numbered sequentially with the exception of "exempt" pages identified below.

(b) The Table of Contents will not count against the page limitations for their respective volumes.

4.2.5 List of Tables and Figures

(a) Each volume shall list any tables and figures used within that volume.

(b) The List of Tables and Figures will not count against the page limitations for their respective volumes.

4.2.6 Glossary of Abbreviations and Acronyms

(a) One glossary shall be developed for the entire proposal and provided in each volume.

(b) Glossaries do not count against the page limitations for their respective volumes.

4.2.7 Electronic Copies (E-Copies)

(a) General requirements

(1) Complete electronic copies of all volumes shall be submitted in Adobe Acrobat Portable Document File (.pdf) . Completesearchable text format electronic copies of Volume VI shall be submitted in both Adobe Acrobat Portable Document Files (.pdf) and Microsoftsearchable text format Excel Files (.xlsx). All documents shall be submitted in a format that is not protected (password, filtered, hidden, format, structure, etc.) in a manner that would prohibit the Government from filtering, sorting, or otherwise evaluating all associated proposal information.

(2) Electronic file directory titles and organization shall reflect the titles and organization of these instructions.

(3) Electronic copies of each volume shall be compatible with the following available Government equipment and software products:

a. Adobe Acrobat

b. Windows 11

c. Microsoft Office Professional Suite

(4) Sound or video (e.g. MPEG) files shall be embedded into the proposal files.not

(b) Cost Breakdown requirements

(1) The Cost Model Workbook includes a summary of all CLINs, inclusive of FFP CLINs, subtotaled by each period within the Ordering Period (Base and Optional). The files shall not be password protected or otherwise "locked" or "hidden" to permit thorough evaluation of proposal formulas.

(2) Electronic copies of .xlsx documents must include clearly visible formulas and must not include any hidden columns or rows. Offeror's cost breakdown spreadsheets must not be password protected.

4.2.8 Page Format Restrictions and Limitations

4.2.8.1 Page Format

(a) All pages shall include an appropriate header and footer that identifies the Solicitation number, contractor name as identified in the System for Award Management (SAM) and Unique Entity Identifier (UEI) number, date, volume number and page number. Each paragraph (in addition to heading levels) shall be uniquely numbered within each Volume of the proposal. Offerors shall provide SOW references in their proposal as applicable to facilitate evaluations and to demonstrate the Offeror's understanding of the requirement.

(b) Text pages shall be portrait oriented. Graphics and tables may be landscape oriented if required to properly present the information.

(c) Pages shall be typed with at least single line spacing. Pages shall contain page numbers in the footer.

(d) No narrow or condensed fonts allowed. Times New Roman or Arial is required. The font size shall be no less than 12 point except for the following:

(1) The reproduced sections of the solicitation document shall be as reproduced.

(2) The font shall be no smaller than 10 point for text in tables, charts, graphs, and figures.

(3) The font for table cell, chart, graph, or figure labels shall be no smaller than 10 point.

(e) Margins on all four edges of each sheet will be at least one inch.

(f) Proprietary statements, security markings, and page numbers can fall within the defined margin area.

4.2.8.2 RESERVED

4.2.8.3 Page Limitations

(a) Page limitations shall be treated as maximums. What Counts as a Page: A page is defined as 8.5 x 11" sheet of paper (minimum of one-inch margins). Each side of a sheet counts as one page. Foldouts will be counted as the appropriate number of pages based on an 8.5 x 11" sheet. Each page shall include an appropriate header and footer identifying the Solicitation number, contractor name as listed in the SAM, the Offeror's UEI number, date, volume number and page number. If an Offeror creates an ambiguity, the Government will use its discretion in determining the page count. All material shall be contained within the page limits specified for each volume, unless otherwise stated. All appendices, charts, graphs, diagrams, tables, photographs, drawings, etc. are included in the page count.

(b) If page limits are exceeded, the excess pages will not be read or considered in the evaluation of the proposal.

4.2.8.4 Pages Counted

(a) Each page shall be counted except the following. All pages exempt from the page count shall be marked as "exempt" and may contain a page number. Pages that are marked as exempt, but the Government determines that they do not meet the requirements of an exempt page, shall not be considered, and will be treated the same as pages in excess of the page count.

(1) Cover pages

(2) Table of Contents

(3) List of Tables and Figures

(4) Glossaries

(5) Blank pages marked "Intentionally Left Blank"

(6) Labor Category Descriptions/Position Descriptions

(7) Resumes and letters of commitment

(8) Continuation of Essential Contractor Services Plan

(9) Contract Transition or Phase-In / Phase-Out Plan

4.2.8.5 : Entire Contract Proposal is due at RFP closing; See SF33 Block 9.Proposal Due Date Schedule

5. VOLUME I - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The Executive Summary is a concise narrative summary of the entire proposal, highlighting key or unique features. The executive summary will describe an overview of the organizational concept including the positioning of the MCPP project within the corporate structure, functions to be provided from the corporate entity, a discussion of critical/key subcontractors, teammates, and / or Joint Venture partners; and a description of the organizational approach to be implemented in order to fulfill the requirements of the MCPP RFP, and an organizational chart providing an overview of the organizational structure to be implemented. Offerors shall include a detailed, bulletized listing of all assumptions made in proposal development. Any summary of proposal information presented within the Executive Summary shall not be considered as meeting the requirements for any portions of other volumes of the proposal.

6. VOLUME II - MANAGEMENT PROPOSAL

Offerors shall provide a Management Proposal that sets forth in the most comprehensive manner, the Offeror's management approach to achieve MCPP requirements. Volume II shall specifically address:

-The Offeror's intended organizational structure to accomplish MCPP RFP / SOW requirements.

-Human Resource Management (SOW C.2.1.1). The proposal must describe how the Offeror will recruit, hire, train and retain a workforce capable of executing MCPP requirements; address staffing of the HR function including labor category and number of Human Resources personnel on site at MCSF-BI. Describe what HR support is to be provided from the corporate entity.

-Fiscal Resource Management (SOW C.2.1.2). The proposal must describe the Offeror's staffing of the finance and accounting functions, the labor category and number of finance / accounting personnel on-site at MCSF-BI, and what finance / accounting support is to be provided from the corporate entity. Of critical importance, the proposal must address the Offeror's process to provide Contract Cost and Status Reports (CCSR) per SOW C.2.1.2.2 and Section G-6, with emphasis on accurate and up-to-date Estimates at Completion (EAC) for each CPFF Task Order.

-Quality and Risk Management (SOW C.2.2). The proposal must describe how the Offeror will implement a Quality Control (QC) program to achieve MCPP requirements; the Offeror's QC staffing including the number of Quality Inspectors (QI) and Process Control Analysts (PCA), and the position of the Quality function within the proposed organizational structure.

-Production Planning and Control (PP&C) Management (SOW C.2.3). The proposal must describe how the Offeror will plan production schedules;

the methods / processes to be used to achieve schedule compliance; PP&C staffing by labor category and number of personnel, and the position of the PP&C function within the organizational structure.

-Maintenance Management (SOW C.2.4). The proposal must describe the location of the Maintenance Management Office within the Offeror's organizational structure, the staffing by labor category and number of personnel, and how Maintenance Management responsibilities will be implemented within the proposed organization. Note: Technical details of the Maintenance Management function must be addressed in the USMC Technical volume as described in the instructions for that volume.

-Contract Transition - Phase-In/Phase-Out Plan (H-21). The proposal must describe how the Offeror will meet the requirements of H-21 to ensure a successful transition.

7. VOLUME III - TECHNICAL PROPOSAL - USMC

Offerors shall provide a USMC Technical Proposal describing how the Offeror will achieve MCPP requirements for USMC Supply and Distribution (SOW C.4), USMC Maintenance Management (SOW C.2.4) and USMC Maintenance for activities conducted at MCSF-BI in Jacksonville, FL (SOW C.3); while deployed aboard Maritime Prepositioning Ships (MPS) (SOW C.7), and at land-based prepositioning sites (SOW C.3, C.4). The Offeror will also provide a section within the USMC Technical Proposal addressing how the Offeror will accomplish MCPP requirements for Medical Materiel and equipment (SOW C.5)

7.1 . The USMC Technical Proposal must include a comprehensive Supply and Distribution methodology.USMC Supply and Distribution (SOW C.4) The Supply and Distribution methodology must clearly describe how the Offeror will achieve MCPP requirements in the performance of supply activities at MCSF-BI, aboard ships and at land-based prepositioning sites. At a minimum the Offeror must address the following:

-Demand Planning of Materiel Requirements -Procurement and Sourcing -Inventory Management -MMC Supply Production -Container Management -Transportation and Distribution Management

7.2 . The USMC Technical Proposal must include a comprehensive Maintenance ManagementUSMC Maintenance Management (SOW C.2.4) methodology. The Maintenance Management methodology must clearly describe how the Offeror will achieve MCPP requirements within SOW C.

2.4. At a minimum the Offeror must address the following:

-Maintenance Administration -Records and Reporting -Maintenance Management Training -Publication Control -Equipment Availability -Preventive and Corrective Maintenance -Maintenance Related Programs

7.3. . The USMC Technical Proposal must include a comprehensive Maintenance methodology. TheUSMC Maintenance (SOW C.3, C.7) Maintenance methodology must clearly describe how the Offeror will achieve MCPP requirements within SOW C.3 and SOW C.7. At a minimum the Offeror's Maintenance methodology must address the following:

-SL-3 Inventory and Inspection -Limited Technical Inspections -Preventive Maintenance Checks and Services (PMCS) -PMCS and Corrective Maintenance (CM) of Organic Assets

-CM

-MCPP-PHIL Maintenance -MCPP-N Maintenance -Surge Support -Shipboard Maintenance

7.4 . The Offeror shall provide a work breakdown structure with staffing levels by labor category for eachUSMC and Medical Materiel Manning component of the proposed organization. This work breakdown structure is in addition to and supported by the organizational structure overview required in Volume I, Executive Summary. The work breakdown structure shall correlate and provide traceability to the required Employee Qualifications provided in SOW Attachment C.2.1.1. The work breakdown structure should include Medical Materiel (SOW C.5). The work breakdown structure shall be segregated by supervisory levels, providing the proposed management to supervisor ratio and the supervisor to labor ratio for each operating location to include ashore prepositioning sites (MCPP-N and MCPP-PHIL), shipboard, and at MCSF-BI. Labor Categories shall align with the applicable Collective Bargaining Agreement and Service Contract Act. Offerors shall provide a clear naming convention for Exempt employee positions so that the intended organizational role is clear.

8. VOLUME IV - TECHNICAL PROPOSAL - NAVY

8.1 : Offerors shall describe their relevant experience and capabilities to perform the MCPP II requirements for supply chain support ofNavy Supply Navy Civil Engineer Support Equipment (CESE), Navy containerized capability sets (CAPSETs), Navy organic assets and Navy watercraft assigned to the Maritime Prepositioning Force (MPF) Program in compliance with SOW C.6. The offeror shall submit a detailed Navy Supply Methodology that clearly describes at a minimum each of the following elements:

-Navy Supply Center (NSC) -Facility organization and cleanliness -Navy Warehousing -Supply Administration -Inventory Management and Control (Relational Supply) -Interface/Interaction with USMC Supply effort -Procurement Sourcing -Disposition -Transportation -Distribution -Materiel Handling Equipment support -OGP Accountability and Serviceability -Supply Chain Quality Control (QC)

8.2 : The offeror shall describe their Navy containerized Capability Set production strategy to achieve prescribed timelines, at anCAPSET Production acceptable level of quality and attainment for Navy Containerized assets. The Offeror shall describe their proposed partnering for container repairs.

The Offeror shall submit a detailed Navy production methodology that clearly describes at a minimum each of the following elements:

-Containerized CAPSET production strategy, including surge capability and cross utilization of NSC resources to achieve prescribed timelines, at an acceptable level of quality and attainment for Navy Containerized assets. Approach includes strategy for receiving, inspecting, certifying, production, contents replenishment, inventory, serviceability and any interface or interaction with desegrated maintenance shops necessary for CAPSET maintenance -Interface/Interaction/Coordination with multiple maintenance shops -Container Maintenance Administration (NTCSS OMMS-NG) -Container management procedures that identify how to record, schedule, track status, and execute all maintenance, repair, and logistics related tasks will be accomplished for container management.

-Container management approach for container refurbishment, corrosion control and repairs.

-Data processing, labeling and marking processes -Quality Control (QC) for internal and external Capability Set production/maintenance

8.3 : The Offeror shall describe their Maintenance strategy to achieve prescribed timelines, at an acceptable level of quality forCESE Maintenance Navy CESE, including containerized capability set maintenance in support of NSC production efforts and supply chain support required from the (NSC) to support CESE maintenance. The CESE maintenance production approach, such as scheduling, prioritization, resource allocations, management, and integration of CESE maintenance production with USMC effort must include, at a minimum, the following:

-CESE maintenance afloat

-CESE COSIS

-CESE ALTS/FSB/SOUM processing -CESE Quality Control (QC)

8.4 : The Offeror shall describe their maintenance strategy to achieve prescribed timelines, at an acceptable level of qualityWatercraft Maintenance for Navy watercraft assigned to the MPF Program. The Offeror shall describe their proposed partnering for intermediate and depot level repairs. The Offeror shall submit a detailed Navy Maintenance Methodology that clearly describes at a minimum each of the following elements:

-Maintenance Requirements Package (MRP) program compliance and management, categories 1-4 -SYSALTS/FSB/SOUM processing -Work Definition Conference (WDC) process requirements -Master Schedule and Maintenance Model schedule management and understanding -Subcontract strategy for organizational level maintenance (Ex., Calibration/sanitation resourcing) -Maintenance Administration (NTCSS OMMS-NG) processes and resourcing -Local industry partnering/sub-contracting for intermediate and depot level repairs -Watercraft Corrosion Control and Coating systems maintenance at the organizational level -Operations Support Team (OST)/Watercraft Berthing, Drydocking, Launching, Towing, Portage, Cross-decking and Watercraft Monitoring, Pre MAT & Post MAT -Navy Watercraft Maintenance Center (WMC) / Preventive and Corrective Maintenance, resourcing, organization, facilities and production strategy to improve watercraft readiness -Control Systems Support (CSS) strategy and resourcing -Navy watercraft corrosion control maintenance in the CRF

-Maintenance Augment Team (MAT) strategy and Navy watercraft monitoring (COSIS) program approach -Intermediate Maintenance Team (IMT) strategy -Strategy to subcontract services combined with local industry capability to support Intermediate and Depot level watercraft repairs impacts maintenance milestones with compounding effects to on time delivery of Navy Capability Sets. The Navy technical proposal should identify solutions that maximize the efficiency and effectiveness of watercraft maintenance operations.

-Quality Control (QC) for internal and external Capability Set production/maintenance

8.5 : The Offeror shall describe their Maintenance strategy to achieve prescribed timelines, at anOrganic Government Property (OGP) Serviceability acceptable level of quality for Navy owned OGP, including major Material Handling Equipment (MHE)/ Weight Handling Equipment (WHE) that is assigned to the MPF Program, addressing the following at a minimum:

-Strategy for OGE Subcontract Work -Maintenance Administration (NTCSS OMMS-NG) -OGE inventory management -OGE preventive maintenance -OGE corrective maintenance -OGE corrosion control and coating systems maintenance, organizational, intermediate and depot level.

-Quality Control (QC), for both internal and external maintenance.

-NAVFAC P-307 program compliance

8.6 : The Offeror shall provide a work breakdown structure with staffing levels by labor category for each component of the proposedNavy Manning organization. This work breakdown structure is in addition to and supported by the organizational structure overview required in Volume I, Executive Summary. The work breakdown structure shall correlate and provide traceability to the required Employee Qualifications provided in SOW Attachment C.2.1.1. The work breakdown structure shall be segregated by supervisory levels, providing the proposed management to supervisor ratio and the supervisor to labor ratio for each operating location such as shipboard, and at MCSF-BI. Labor Categories shall align with the applicable Collective Bargaining Agreement and Service Contract Act. Offerors shall provide a clear naming convention for Exempt employee positions so that the intended organizational role is clear.

9. VOLUME V - PAST PERFORMANCE

9.1 The Offeror shall provide up to three (3) relevant and recent past performance references. Relevancy and recency are defined in Section M. Each Offeror can provide in its proposal any information regarding its (to include subcontractors) past performance of contracts similar to the Government's requirement that it would like the Government to consider. Such information may supplement what the Government has readily available, what is included in CPARS or other databases, or what the Offeror considers essential to the Government's evaluation. Offerors may also provide explanatory information regarding any substandard or poor performance and the corrective actions taken to prevent a recurrence.

Past performance may include Federal, State and Local Government and private sector contracts. If subcontractor experience is submitted for consideration as part of the proposal, the offeror should include a commitment signed by offeror and subcontractor certifying that if a contract is awarded resulting from the proposal, the parties commit to joint performance as proposed. If the signed commitment is not fully executed by both parties and provided with the Past Performance Proposal, subcontractor references will not be evaluated or considered. Affiliate companies, sister companies, teaming arrangements, joint venture agreement, etc., will be considered provided that sufficient documentation is included in the proposal.

The primary offering entity must demonstrate that the affiliate will perform significant and critical aspects of the contract if awarded. Documentation includes a copy of the signed arrangement such as documented affiliation, a copy of the teaming agreement, a copy of the joint venture agreement, etc.

The Government reserves the right to verify statements and representations made in the Offeror's proposal. To obtain information, the Government may contact the points of contact listed by the Offeror; however, the Government is not required to contact the points of contact provided by the Offeror and may limit the number of references it chooses to contact. The Government may also contact references not provided by the Offeror in order to evaluate the Offeror's past performance. Offerors shall ensure that the information provided in Volume V is current and accurate, including validated phone numbers and email addresses for all points of contacts. The burden of providing thorough and complete past performance information remains with the Offeror.

Offerors should provide the following information for up to three relevant and recent past performance references:

Section 1 - Basic Past Performance Information -Name of Past Performance Effort -Name and Contact Information for Contracting Agency or Private Sector Company -Name(s) and Contact Information of COR(s) and Quality Assurance Representatives, as applicable -Contract Number -Contract Type (COST TYPE, FFP, etc.)

-Initial Contract Value -Total Contract Value (including all contract modifications to date) -Period of Performance -Role Performed (Prime Contractor, Subcontractor, etc.)

-Historical compliance with the requirements of FAR 52.218-8 (for all Offerors) and 52.219-9 (for large business offerors)

Section 2 - Relevance to Current Requirement -Describe the work products and/or services delivered to customers under this past performance reference.

-Demonstrate the relevance by describing how this past performance correlates with the Requirements (i.e. SOW requirements) in terms of scope, magnitude, and complexity (see section M).

9.2 Past Performance Questionnaire

If there is a CPARS evaluation record available for the referenced contract, the Offeror does not need to have an assessor fill out the PPI Questionnaire (RFP Attachment #S-3). The Offeror may instead include a copy of the CPARS evaluation.