L-2_RIS_Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) SD PSM.docx

DOCX document 33 KB Posted

Attached to
San Diego Carriers CVN IDIQ Maintenance/Repair
Solicitation number
N00024-23-R-4107
Issued by

About this file

This document contains a past performance questionnaire for a federal solicitation. The Naval Sea Systems Command is seeking capability and capacity support for maintenance, repair, and modernization efforts for CVN 68 and CVN 78 class aircraft carriers homeported in and visiting San Diego, California. The contract will support emergent work, continuous maintenance availabilities, pre-refueling complex overhaul availabilities, and Chief of Naval Operations scheduled availabilities. Offerors must submit completed past performance questionnaires directly to the government by January 9, 2023. The questionnaire contains six performance factors and requests the reference evaluator provide adjectival ratings and substantiating comments for the offeror's past performance.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
N00024-23-R-4107 Amendment 00005 conformed with redlines.pdf PDF
N00024-23-R-4107 Amendment 00005.pdf PDF
SD PSM QA Round 5.pdf PDF
SD PSM QA Round 4.pdf PDF
SPS Amendment 0004.pdf PDF
N00024-23-R-4107_Amendment 0004_Conformed with Redlines.docx.pdf PDF
SD PSM QA Round 3.docx.pdf PDF
SPS Amendment 0003.pdf PDF
L-3_Cost Proposal Format SD PSM_12.16.22.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
L-2_RIS_Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) SD PSM_12.16.22.docx DOCX document
N00024-23-R-4107_Amendment 0003_Conformed with Redlines.pdf PDF
SD PSM QA Round 2.pdf PDF
L-3_Cost Proposal Format SD PSM_12.12.22.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
SPS Amendment 0002.pdf PDF
N00024-23-R-4107_Amendment 0002_Conformed with redlines.pdf PDF
L-3_Cost Proposal Format SD PSM_12.2.22.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
SPS Amendment 0001.pdf PDF
L-2_RIS_Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) SD PSM_12.2.22.docx DOCX document
N00024-23-R-4107_Amendment 0001_Conformed with redlines.pdf PDF
SD PSM QA.pdf PDF
J-2_DD 254 N00024-22-R-4107_SIGNED.pdf PDF
J-7_Continuous Maintenance Planning 897-11-001-002 FY-22 06.16.21.pdf PDF
L-1_Bidders Question Submittal Form_ SD PSM.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
CUI_J-1 Notional Work Package PIA_ 8.11.22.pdf PDF
Exhibit A - Contract Data Requirements List(s) CDRLs DD Form 1423 10.25.22.pdf PDF
CUI_J-5 CVN Availability Schedule 2022-07-16.pdf PDF
N00024-23-R-4107_SD PSM RFP_11.23.22.pdf PDF
L-3_Cost Proposal Format SD PSM_10.24.22.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
DD-2345_Template.pdf PDF
J-6_Determination of AF and SBSIF_ 11.1.22.pdf PDF
CUI_J-3_Integrated Logistic Support Contract Specification _9.27.22.pdf PDF
Show all 31

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

SAN DIEGO CVN PRIVATE SECTOR MAINTENANCE

SOLICITATION NO. N00024-23-R-4107

ATTACHMENT L-2

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Instructions to Offeror

1.For each reference submitted in your proposal, enter the required information in Section A below.
2.Offerors are responsible for sending copies of the PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE to references. Transmit the entire questionnaire to the identified Points of Contact (POCs) and place one copy of each Section A submission in your proposal submittal.
3.Once completed by the POC, PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRES must be directly transmitted to the Government as described on the following page. Completed PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRES received from the Offerors as not acceptable.

SECTION A: PAST PERFORMANCE REFERENCE INFORMATION (To be filled out by the Offeror):

NAME OF OFFEROR:

CONTRACT or ORDER NUMBER:

PROJECT TITLE:

PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE START DATE:

PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE END DATE (including options):

CUSTOMER POINT OF CONTACT NAME:

POINT OF CONTACT TITLE:

POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE:

POINT OF CONTACT MAILING ADDRESS:

POINT OF CONTACT EMAIL:

TYPE OF CONTRACT: (CPFF, CPIF, CPAF, FFP, ETC.):

AMOUNT OF CONTRACT ($USD):

DESCRIPTION OF SUPPLIES / SERVICES (Provide reason if terminated):

Instructions to Evaluator The Naval Sea Systems Command is procuring capability and capacity to the Ships’ Force for effective support of maintenance, repair and modernization efforts for the CVN 68 and CVN 78 Class Aircraft Carriers. Evaluation of an Offeror’s past performance is integral to our source selection process. Accordingly, we request your candid assessment of the Offeror’s past performance; please see Section below for the identity of the Offeror and contract of interest.

Once completed, this questionnaire and any appended information becomes Source Selection Sensitive and must be protected from disclosure. Access to this information shall be limited to Government procurement officials.

Please forward the completed questionnaire no later than 9 JAN 2023 to:

Naval Sea Systems Command, Code 02413
Attn: Mr. Ryan Rubel
Telephone No. (202) 781-4143
Email Address: ryan.c.rubel.civ@us.navy.mil

Hand-written evaluations are acceptable. All evaluations must relate solely to the Offeror and the contract, task, or order identified in SECTION A.

For each of the criteria listed below, the evaluator must choose One (1) Adjectival Rating by checking the box (double-clicking the box), as applicable. Please provide supporting comments for each rating. Please use your supporting comments to highlight the Offeror’s specific strengths and weaknesses. You may use additional sheets if required. Your ratings and comments should reflect only “contractor liable” performance. You may supplement your knowledge with the knowledge and judgment of others in your organization.

Please enter the requested information in SECTION B for the person primarily responsible for completing the questionnaire, then transmit the completed questionnaire to the point of contact identified above. Thank you for your assistance in this matter.

PLEASE DO NOT PROVIDE COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRES TO THE OFFEROR

Section B: PAST PERFORMANCE REFERENCE INFORMATION (To be filled out by the Evaluator):

NAME:

TITLE:

AGENCY/CUSTOMER ORGANIZATION:

PHONE:

E-MAIL

Signature:

1. Overall Contract Outcome Ability to satisfactorily complete all tasks while conforming to customer requirements, standards of good workmanship and safe practices.

RATING
Adjectival Rating
Definition

Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective

Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective

Satisfactory Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory

Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

SUBSTANTIATING COMMENTS:

2. Cost Performance Ability to accurately forecast and control costs throughout all phases of the contract.

RATING
Adjectival Rating
Definition

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective

Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

3. Schedule Performance Ability to develop accurate work schedules and adhere to those schedules as well as the ability to adapt to changes in requirements and work schedules.

RATING
Adjectival Rating
Definition

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective

Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

4. Technical Performance Ability to overcome technical challenges by applying sound engineering principles, complete required engineering analyses, and develop adequate technical reports and plans.

RATING
Adjectival Rating
Definition

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective

Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

5. Customer Relations Degree of customer satisfaction based on the contractor's cooperative behavior, general business-like concern for the interest of the customer, and customer orientated management practices.

RATING
Adjectival Rating
Definition

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective

Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

6. Small, Small Disadvantaged, and Women-Owned Business Utilization Compliance with subcontracting plan goals for Small, Small Disadvantaged, and Women-owned business concerns and monetary targets for such concerns.

RATING
Adjectival Rating
Definition

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective

Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 and 3.104

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .