13Jan20_TrackedChanges_07_L-5_PP_Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 34 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Systems Engineering & Integration-2 (SE&I-2) FINAL Request for Proposal (RFP) Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA8811-20-R-0003
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire for a federal contractor providing systems engineering and integration services. The questionnaire requests ratings and comments on the contractor's performance in areas such as launch process and operations experience, small/medium/heavy rockets experience, mission integration experience, data protection and security, and management responsiveness. The evaluator is asked to identify any strengths and weaknesses displayed by the contractor during performance. The related federal contract opportunity is a final request for proposal for continued Systems Engineering & Integration services. Responses to the RFP are due by November 8, 2019. The solicitation is being conducted by the Space and Missile Systems Center/Launch Enterprise at Los Angeles Air Force Base and involves North American Industry Classification System code 541715 with a small business size standard of 1250 employees.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 50
Systems Engineering & Integration-2 (SE&I-2) FINAL Request for Proposal (RFP) has more files on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
FA8811-20-R-0003
Attachment L-5
Past Performance Questionnaire
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)
WHEN FILLED IN THIS DOCUMENT IS SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION IAW FAR 2.101 & 3.104
SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION
A. Contractor: ________________________________________________________________________
B. Contractor Cage Code: _________________________________
C. Contract number: ______________________________________
D. Contract type: ______________________________
E. Was this a competitive contract? Yes _____ No _____
F. Period of performance: _________________________________________________________ Initial FTEs provided:________________________________________________________ Final FTEs provided: _______________________________________________________
G. Reason for differences between the initial FTE totals and the Final FTE totals:
H. Initial contract cost: $____________________________
I. Current/final contract cost: $_______________________________
J. Reasons for differences between initial contract cost and final contract costs: _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
K. Description of service provided (e.g. systems engineering and integration analysis, mission unique activities, payload processing, classified security):
SECTION 2: CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION
A. Customer or agency name: __________________________________________________________
B. Procuring Contracting Officer (or equivalent) name, e-mail, and phone number:
C. Customer or agency description (if applicable): __________________________________________
SECTION 3: EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION
A. Evaluator's name: __________________________________________________________________
B. Evaluator's title: ___________________________________________________________________
C. Evaluator’s email address: ___________________________________________________________
D. Evaluator's phone/fax number: ________________________________________________________
Length of time (number of years/months) evaluator worked on subject contract: ____________________
SECTION 4: EVALUATION
Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:
PERFORMANCE RATING
| Rating |
| Definition |
| Exceptional (E) |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. |
| Very Good (VG) |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was effective. |
| Satisfactory (S) |
| Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory. |
| Marginal (M) |
| Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented. |
| Unsatisfactory (U) |
| Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
| Not Applicable (N/A) |
| Unable to provide a rating. Contract did not include performance for this aspect, or information was not available. Do not know. Add comments as appropriate. |
Please restrict your responses and comments to actual work accomplished by the contractor in the previous five years.
Qualitative Assessment of Relevant Areas
| Ratings Categories |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
| Launch Process and Operations Experience |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
E1. Did the contractor perform Launch Process and Operations activities to meet the technical requirements of the contract and, if so, what was the performance quality for the launch process and operations work? If not E or VG, please explain.
Comment:________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
E2. Did the contractor effectively provide experienced personnel with Launch Process and Operations expertise to meet program needs and, if so, what was the performance quality of the launch process and operations personnel? If not E or VG, please explain.
Comment:________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
| Small/Medium/Heavy Rockets |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
F1. Did the contractor perform Small, Medium, or Heavy Rocket work to meet the technical requirements of the contract and, if so, what was the performance quality in understanding the risks associated with medium and heavy rockets? If not E or VG, please explain.
Comment:________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
F2. Did the contractor effectively provide personnel with Medium and Heavy Rockets experience to meet program needs and, if so, what was the performance quality of the experienced medium and heavy rockets personnel? If not E or VG, please explain.
Comment:________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
| Mission Integration |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
G1. Did the contractor perform mission integration work to meet the technical requirements of the contract and, if so, what was the performance quality in understanding the risks associated with mission integration? If not E or VG, please explain.
Comment:________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
G2. Did the contractor effectively provide personnel with Mission Integration experience to meet program needs and, if so, what was the performance quality of the experienced mission integration personnel? If not E or VG, please explain.
Comment:________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Data Protection and Security Breach
H1. How well did the contractor ensure that other Contractor’s proprietary data was not released in violation of any non-disclosure agreements? If not E or VG, please explain.
Comment:________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
H2. How well did the contractor comply with all security requirements? If not E or VG please explain.
Comment:________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Management Responsiveness
J1. Did the contractor’s management engage in responsive communications that fostered collaboration among stakeholders and/or participant programs to deliver program requirements? If not E or VG, please explain.
Comment:________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
J2. What was the contractor’s overall performance against the requirement? If not E or VG, please explain.
Comment:_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
J3. When needed, did the contractor quickly increase staffing levels to support the mission? If not E or VG, please explain.
Comment:________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
J4. Did the contractor successfully respond to emergency or surge situations? If not E or VG, please explain.
Comment:________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
J5. Did the contractor effectively manage scheduling and communicate issues that may affect other stakeholders and/or project completion? If not E or VG, please explain.
Comment:________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
J6. Did the contractor’s processes and tools in proactively identifying technical issues and risks benefit your organization? If not E or VG, please explain.
Comment:________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
J7. Did the contractor comprehend and meaningfully integrate complex technical requirements/issues, stakeholder needs/concerns, and schedule dependencies with external interfaces? If not E or VG, please explain.
Comment:________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
J8. Did the contractor sufficiently provide data from their tools at contract completion that was easily transferable to the government and subsequent contractors? If not E or VG, please explain.
Comment:________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
1. Please provide any specific strengths that provided value to the customer in the contractor’s execution in their responsibilities.
2. Please identify any contractor weaknesses that were displayed during this contractors’ performance.
3. Please discuss each and every response for which you indicated as Marginal (M) and Unacceptable (U) in response to the questions above (use additional sheets, if necessary).
4. Was this contract partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?
Yes___ Default___ Convenience___ Pending Terminations___ No ___
If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules).
SECTION 5: NARRATIVE SUMMARY
1. Given what you know today about the contractor’s ability to execute, would award to the contractor if given the choice? Please select one response
___ Definitely would award ___ Probably would award ___ Probably would not award ___ Definitely would not award
Are there any reservations about soliciting this contractor in the future or having them perform one of your critical and demanding programs?
2. Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, to include areas where the contractor made improvements throughout the life of the contract, or any additional information you feel is important in the evaluation of the contractor’s performance.
Evaluator’s Signature Date
Please return this completed questionnaire to:
Maj Ashley Cunningham Ashley.cunningham.4@us.af.mil
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .