12Dec2019_18_L-5 Past Performance Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 35 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Systems Engineering & Integration-2 (SE&I-2) FINAL Request for Proposal (RFP) Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA8811-20-R-0003
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire for a federal contractor providing systems engineering and integration services. The questionnaire requests performance ratings and commentary on the contractor's launch process and operations experience, rockets and propulsion systems experience, mission integration experience, ground systems engineering experience, propulsion engineering experience, and management responsiveness on a previous contract. It seeks an overall assessment of the contractor's ability to execute on critical demands as well as any reservations about future work. Respondents are advised that data may be shared with an administrative support contractor.
The related federal contract opportunity is a draft request for proposals for continued Systems Engineering & Integration services. It provides background on an industry day and requests industry feedback on the draft documents by November 8, 2019. Though not a small business set-aside, responses from small businesses are encouraged. The opportunity involves the Department of the Air Force Space Command Space and Missile Systems Center.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 50
Systems Engineering & Integration-2 (SE&I-2) FINAL Request for Proposal (RFP) has more files on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
FA8811-19-R-0003
Attachment L-4
Past Performance Questionnaire
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)
WHEN FILLED IN THIS DOCUMENT IS SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION IAW FAR 2.101 & 3.104
SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION
A. Contractor: ________________________________________________________________________
B. Contractor Cage Code: _________________________________
C. Contract number: ______________________________________
D. Contract type: ______________________________
E. Was this a competitive contract? Yes _____ No _____
F. Period of performance: _________________________________________________________ Initial FTEs provided:________________________________________________________ Final FTEs provided: _______________________________________________________
G. Reason for differences between the initial FTE totals and the Final FTE totals:
H. Initial contract cost: $____________________________
I. Current/final contract cost: $_______________________________
J. Reasons for differences between initial contract cost and final contract costs: _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
K. Description of service provided (e.g. systems engineering and integration analysis, mission unique activities, payload processing, classified security):
SECTION 2: CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION
A. Customer or agency name: __________________________________________________________
B. Procuring Contracting Officer (or equivalent) name, e-mail, and phone number:
C. Customer or agency description (if applicable): __________________________________________
SECTION 3: EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION
A. Evaluator's name: __________________________________________________________________
B. Evaluator's title: ___________________________________________________________________
C. Evaluator’s email address: ___________________________________________________________
D. Evaluator's phone/fax number: ________________________________________________________
Length of time (number of years/months) evaluator worked on subject contract: ____________________
SECTION 4: EVALUATION
Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:
PERFORMANCE RATING
| Rating |
| Definition |
| Exceptional (E) |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. |
| Very Good (VG) |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was effective. |
| Satisfactory (S) |
| Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory. |
| Marginal (M) |
| Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented. |
| Unsatisfactory (U) |
| Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
| Not Applicable (N/A) |
| Unable to provide a rating. Contract did not include performance for this aspect, or information was not available. Do not know. Add comments as appropriate. |
Please restrict your responses and comments to actual work accomplished by the contractor in the previous five years.
Qualitative Assessment of Relevant Areas
| Ratings Categories |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
| Launch Process and Operations Experience |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
E1. Did the contractor perform Launch Process and Operations activities to meet the technical requirements of the contract and, if so, what was the performance quality for the launch process and operations work? If not E or VG, please explain.
Comment:________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
E2. Did the contractor effectively provide experienced personnel with Launch Process and Operations expertise to meet program needs and, if so, what was the performance quality of the launch process and operations personnel? If not E or VG, please explain.
Comment:________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
| Rockets and propulsion systems |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
F1. Did the contractor perform on orbital launch vehicles, launch processes, commercial launches, Launch Mission Integration work to meet the technical requirements of the contract and, if so, what was the performance quality in understanding the risks? If not E or VG, please explain.
Comment:________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
F2. Did the contractor effectively provide personnel with relevant experience to meet program needs and, if so, what was the performance quality of the experienced personnel? If not E or VG, please explain.
Comment:________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
| Mission Integration |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
G1. Did the contractor perform mission integration work to meet the technical requirements of the contract and, if so, what was the performance quality in understanding the risks associated with mission integration? If not E or VG, please explain.
Comment:________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
G2. Did the contractor effectively provide personnel with Mission Integration experience to meet program needs and, if so, what was the performance quality of the experienced mission integration personnel? If not E or VG, please explain.
Comment:________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Ground Systems
H1. Did the contractor perform Launch Ground System engineering to meet the technical requirements of the contract and, if so, what was the performance quality for the ground systems engineering? If not E or VG, please explain.
Comment:________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
H2. Did the contractor effectively provide experienced personnel with Launch Ground System engineering expertise to meet program needs, and, if so, what was the performance quality of the ground system engineers? If not E or VG please explain.
Comment:________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
| Propulsion |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
I1. Did the contractor perform Launch Propulsion engineering to meet the technical requirements of the contract and, if so, what was the performance quality for the launch propulsion engineering? If not E or VG, please explain.
Comment:________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
I2. Did the contractor effectively provide experienced personnel with Launch Propulsion engineering expertise and, if so, what was the performance quality of the launch propulsion engineers? If not E or VG please explain.
Comment:________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Management Responsiveness
J1. Did the contractor’s management engage in responsive communications that fostered collaboration among stakeholders and/or participant programs to deliver program requirements? If not E or VG, please explain.
Comment:________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
J2. What was the contractor’s overall performance against the requirement? If not E or VG, please explain.
Comment:_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
J3. When needed, did the contractor quickly increase staffing levels to support the mission? If not E or VG, please explain.
Comment:________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
J4. Did the contractor successfully respond to emergency or surge situations? If not E or VG, please explain.
Comment:________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
J5. Did the contractor effectively manage scheduling and communicate issues that may affect other stakeholders and/or project completion? If not E or VG, please explain.
Comment:________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
J6. Did the contractor’s processes and tools in proactively identifying technical issues and risks benefit your organization? If not E or VG, please explain.
Comment:________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
J7. Did the contractor comprehend and meaningfully integrate complex technical requirements/issues, stakeholder needs/concerns, and schedule dependencies with external interfaces? If not E or VG, please explain.
Comment:________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
J8. Did the contractor sufficiently provide data from their tools at contract completion that was easily transferable to the government and subsequent contractors? If not E or VG, please explain.
Comment:________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
1. Please provide any specific strengths that provided value to the customer in the contractor’s execution in their responsibilities.
2. Please identify any contractor weaknesses that were displayed during this contractors’ performance.
3. Please discuss each and every response for which you indicated as Marginal (M) and Unacceptable (U) in response to the questions above (use additional sheets, if necessary).
4. Was this contract partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?
Yes___ Default___ Convenience___ Pending Terminations___ No ___
If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules).
SECTION 5: NARRATIVE SUMMARY
1. Given what you know today about the contractor’s ability to execute, would award to the contractor if given the choice? Please select one response
___ Definitely would award ___ Probably would award ___ Probably would not award ___ Definitely would not award
Are there any reservations about soliciting this contractor in the future or having them perform one of your critical and demanding programs?
2. Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, to include areas where the contractor made improvements throughout the life of the contract, or any additional information you feel is important in the evaluation of the contractor’s performance.
Evaluator’s Signature Date
Please return this completed questionnaire to:
Los Angeles Air Force Base Attn: SMC/LE 483 N. Aviation Blvd El Segundo, CA 90245
SMC/LE Page 1 of 12
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .