Technical Evaluation Factor - 52.212-1.docx
FAR Clause DOCX document 25 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Occupational Medicine and Audiology Services
- Solicitation number
- FA820127R0001
About this file
This document is a Technical Evaluation Factor form outlining the criteria for evaluating proposals submitted in response to the Occupational Medicine and Audiology Services solicitation for Hill Air Force Base, Utah. The evaluation framework establishes the technical merit standards that will be applied to assess contractor proposals, with emphasis placed on the contractor's qualifications, experience, and capability to deliver occupational medicine and audiology services. The form serves as a template component for the solicitation package and provides the structured methodology by which the government will compare and rate competing proposals based on defined technical factors rather than pricing considerations alone. This evaluation approach is consistent with FAR requirements for commercial items under simplified acquisition procedures and ensures transparent, consistent assessment across all submissions received for this military medical services requirement.
View the file
Other versions and copies of FAR 52.212-1
Show all 20
Who attaches FAR 52.212-1
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Solicitation_Amendment_FA820127R0001_0001.pdf | ||
| SOW_Occ Med - FY27 (as of 10NOV26).docx | DOCX document | |
| SOW_Occ Med - 22OCT26.pdf | ||
| Solicitation_FA820127R0001.pdf | ||
| SOW_Occ Med - 22OCT26.docx | DOCX document | |
| WD 2015-5483_rev31.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION - SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104 for Occupational Medicine Services
| Contractor: |
| Name of Evaluator: |
Volume II - Technical Acceptability
Factor One:
Sub-Factor One: Organizational Structure Requirements - Minimum criteria is met when the proposal included the following:
Acceptable
Unacceptable Why: Where in the Proposal (i.e. page, paragraph, throughout, etc.)?
OR
Why Not: What part of FAR 52.212-1 - Instruction to Offeror (ITO) - Addendum, FAR 52.212-2 Evaluation - Commercial Item Evaluation Factors for Award Addendum, PWS, etc. did the proposal not fully address?
A. An organizational structure in the business plan for prime contractors and all teaming partners and subcontractors that demonstrates the staffing plan to be provided in accordance with SOW, Contractor Requirements on page 2.
Comments:
B. The offeror shall state an overall approach that at least 50 percent of the cost of contract performance incurred for personnel shall be expended for the prime contractor’s employees (FAR 52.219-14, Limitations on Subcontracting and 13 CFR 125.6).
Comments:
Sub-Factor Two: Credentialing, Privileging and Recruiting Requirements - Minimum criteria is met when the proposal included the following:
Why: Where in the Proposal (i.e. page, paragraph, throughout, etc.)?
OR
Why Not: What part of FAR 52.212-1 - Instruction to Offeror (ITO) - Addendum, FAR 52.212-2 Evaluation - Commercial Item Evaluation Factors for Award Addendum, PWS, etc. did the proposal not fully address?
A. The offeror’s process to submit complete and accurate credentials packages for credentialed HCWs near the start of the contract transition period to enable granting of privileges by the 75 MDG to allow for performance of all tasks identified in the SOW.
Comments:
B. The contractor will ensure all healthcare workers maintain Basic Life Support (BLS) or Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) certification throughout their employment.
Comments:
C. The contractor shall state within the business plan, the recruiting methodology for finding, pre-screening, and submitting qualifying documentation against the SOW minimum requirements for both credentialed and non-credentialed health care workers
Comments:
Sub-Factor Three: HCW Qualifications - Minimum criteria is met when the proposal included the following:
Why: Where in the Proposal (i.e. page, paragraph, throughout, etc.)?
OR
Why Not: What part of FAR 52.212-1 - Instruction to Offeror (ITO) - Addendum, FAR 52.212-2 Evaluation - Commercial Item Evaluation Factors for Award Addendum, PWS, etc. did the proposal not fully address?
A. The contractor shall state within the business plan, the recruiting methodology for finding, pre-screening, and submitting qualifying documentation against the SOW minimum requirements for both credentialed and non-credentialed health care worker.
Comments:
B. The contractor shall verify and validate candidate qualifications in accordance with SOW including, but not limited to, health, immunizations, complete background checks, and drug screenings.
Comments:
C. Contractor shall ensure HCWs provide proof of immunization from the following diseases according to CDC guidelines: Hepatitis B, measles, mumps, rubella, varicella, and influenza. The health care worker shall also provide proof of a negative TB skin test within 12 months (if positive, proof of negative chest X-ray and/or QuantiFERON Gold test results within 12 months) prior to start of work.
Comments:
D. HCWs must be able to obtain a favorable background check and fingerprints. These requirements will be managed through the 75 MDG’s Security Managers office.
Comments:
E. HCW must maintain a current CAC ID card for base access as well as access to computer network access.
Comments:
Sub-Factor Four: Work location and hours Minimum criteria is met when the proposal included the following:
Why: Where in the Proposal (i.e. page, paragraph, throughout, etc.)?
OR
Why Not: What part of FAR 52.212-1 - Instruction to Offeror (ITO) - Addendum, FAR 52.212-2 Evaluation - Commercial Item Evaluation Factors for Award Addendum, PWS, etc. did the proposal not fully address?
A. Local presence is required by the HCW at the Jensen Occupational Health Clinic, bldg. 249 at Hill Air Force Base
Comments:
B. Occupational Medical Service (OMS) staff will perform the services required under this contract during the following hours: Mon – Fri 0700-1600, except Federal Holidays. To better serve the mission needs, the OMS leadership can implement an alternative work schedule (AWS) where the HCW works a total of 80 hours per pay period and has every other Friday off.
Comments:
Sub-Factor Five: Management Plan Minimum criteria is met when the proposal included the following:
Why: Where in the Proposal (i.e. page, paragraph, throughout, etc.)?
OR
Why Not: What part of FAR 52.212-1 - Instruction to Offeror (ITO) - Addendum, FAR 52.212-2 Evaluation - Commercial Item Evaluation Factors for Award Addendum, PWS, etc. did the proposal not fully address?
A. Professional Compensation Plan – The offeror’s process to ensure a professional compensation plan that provides uninterrupted services for recruitment, placement, and retention for credentialed providers.
Comments:
B. The contractor’s proposed approach to:
• Continuity of services during the replacement of permanent and temporary absences for both credentialed and non-credentialed HCWs such that position vacancies do not exceed 45 calendar days.
• Maintain HCW qualifications (e.g., immunizations, security, certification, licensure, credentials, etc.) before expiration without government oversight, additional cost, or intervention.
Comments:
C. The offeror’s process to adequately review, track, monitor, and respond to OMS and patient complaints using appropriate action to resolve all issues that satisfy Government concerns.
Comments:
Evaluator Signature:
Comments:
Comments:
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION – SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104 PERSONAL PROTECTIVE CLOTHING
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .