RFP_Atch_5d_-_Env_Impact_Study_AF813_TYFR_18-1047.pdf

PDF 911 KB Posted

Attached to
Multiple Award Construction Contract (MACC) Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA5613-19-R-0003
Issued by
Department of the Air Force United States Air Forces in Europe - Air Forces Africa

About this file

This document summarizes a solicitation for a Multiple Award Construction Contract to provide design-build, sustainment, maintenance, alteration, repair, renovation, and minor construction projects at various federal and military installations within the Kaiserslautern Military Community and at Ramstein and Spangdahlem Air Bases in Germany. The Air Force intends to award up to five indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity contracts worth a total of $425 million over five years. Task orders will range from $1,000 to $5 million and include a design-build seed project between $1 million and $5 million at Ramstein Air Base. The solicitation is expected to be released on November 1, 2018, with proposals due December 1, 2018. A pre-proposal conference will be held approximately 7 to 10 days later. All contractors must register in the System for Award Management to receive an award.

RFP Atch 5d - Environmental Impact Study for Seed Project

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Multiple Award Construction Contract (MACC), newest first.
File Type Posted
(Rev_4)_SOW_for_Seed_Proj_(Amend_0004).pdf PDF
(Amend_0004)_Section_L.pdf PDF
(Amendment_0004)_Section_M.pdf PDF
Consolidated_Q&A__7.pdf PDF
(Rev_4)_SOW_for_Seed_Proj_(Amend_0004).pdf PDF
Consolidated_Q&A__6.pdf PDF
Consolidated_Q&A__5.pdf PDF
Consolidated_Q&A__4.pdf PDF
Consolidated_Q&A__3.pdf PDF
RFP_Atch_3_-_(Rev_2)_SOW_for_Seed_Proj_TYFR18-1047.pdf PDF
RFP_Atch_3g_-_(Rev_1)_Shelf_Layouts_and_Dimensions.pdf PDF
FA5613-19-R-0003-0002.pdf PDF
RFP_Atch_3j_-_Hydrant_Flow_Test.xls XLS spreadsheet
RFP_Atch_3g_-_Shelf_Layouts_&_Dimensions.pdf PDF
RFP_Atch_5e_-_Premise_Wiring_Standard.pdf PDF
RFP_Atch_3_-_(Rev_1)_SOW_for_Seed_Proj_TYFR18-1047.pdf PDF
Atch_3_-_Pre-Prop_Conf_&_Site_Visit_Briefing.pdf PDF
Atch_1_-_Conf_&_Site_Visit_Attendance_Record.pdf PDF
Atch_2_-__Consolidated_Q&A_2_(Conf_&_Site_Visit).pdf PDF
Pre-Proposal_Conference_Minutes.pdf PDF
RFP_Atch_3f01_-_Cover,_TOC,_location_plan.dwg DWG drawing
RFP_Atch_3f01_-_Cover,_TOC,_location_plan.pdf PDF
RFP_Atch_8_-_SubK_Consent_Ltr.doc DOC document
RFP_Atch_3_-_SOW_for_Seed_Proj_TYFR18-1047.pdf PDF
RFP_Atch_3f03_-_B02_-_Inventory_topview.dwg DWG drawing
RFP_Atch_3f05_-_B04_-_Inventory_elevations.pdf PDF
RFP_Atch_5a_-_Standardized_Technical_Proposal_(STP).pdf PDF
Invitation_for_Pre-Proposal_&_Conf_Site_Visit.pdf PDF
RFP_Atch_3e_-_Bldg_2167_Work_and_Safety_Plan.docx DOCX document
RFP_Atch_3f06_-_A01_-_New_planning_floor_plan.dwg DWG drawing
RFP_Atch_1_-_General_Requirements_&_Provisions.pdf PDF
RFP_FA5613-19-R-0003_(MACC).pdf PDF
RFP_Atch_2_-_Special_Contract_Requirements.pdf PDF
RFP_Atch_3f04_-_B03_-_Inventory_sectional_views.pdf PDF
RFP_Atch_5b_-_LD_Determination.pdf PDF
Cover_Ltr_-_RFP_Release.pdf PDF
RFP_Atch_3d_-_Bldg_2167_Sample_Taking_Plan.pdf PDF
RFP_Atch_3f04_-_B03_-_Inventory_sectional_views.dwg DWG drawing
RFP_Atch_4_-_Seed_Proj_Bid_Schedule_Worksheet.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
RFP_Atch_9_-_Client_Authorization_Ltr.docx DOCX document
RFP_Atch_7_-_PPQ.doc DOC document
RFP_Atch_3f03_-_B02_-_Inventory_topview.pdf PDF
RFP_Atch_6_-_PPI.doc DOC document
RFP_Atch_3c_-_Bldg_2167_Room_Book.xls XLS spreadsheet
RFP_Atch_3f02_-_B01_-_Inventory_floor_plan.pdf PDF
RFP_Atch_5c_-_Material_Submittal_Form_66_TYFR_18-1047.pdf PDF
RFP_Atch_3f02_-_B01_-_Inventory_floor_plan.dwg DWG drawing
Invitation_Atch_1_-_PreRegistration_Form.docx DOCX document
RFP_Atch_3b_-_Bldg_2167_Disposal_Concept.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
RFP_Atch_3f05_-_B04_-_Inventory_elevations.dwg DWG drawing
Show all 50

Multiple Award Construction Contract (MACC) has more files on GovTribe.

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

REQUEST FOR OVERSEAS ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS

Report Control Symbol

RCS: 35-

INSTRUCTIONS: Section I to be completed by Proponent; Sections II and III to be completed by Environmental Planning Function.

Continue on separate sheets as necessary and reference appropriate item numbers.

SECTION I - PROPONENT INFORMATION

1. TO (Environmental Planning Function) 2. FROM (Proponent organization and functional address symbol) 2a. TELEPHONE

3. TITLE OF PROPOSED ACTION

4. PURPOSE AND NEED FOR ACTION ( Identify decision to be made and need date.)

5. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ACTION (Provide sufficient details for adequate evaluation of the proposal.)

6. PROPONENT APPROVAL (Name and Grade) 6a. SIGNATURE 6b. DATE

SECTION II PRELIMINARY ENVIRONMENTAL SURVEY. (Check appropriate box and describe potential environmental effects including cumulative effects.) (+ = positive effect; O = no effect; - = adverse effect; U = unknown effect)

+ o - u

7. NOISE (On- and off-installation)

8. ENCROACHMENT (Land use, accident potential, etc.)

9. AIR QUALITY (Emissions, etc.)

10. WATER RESOURCES (Quality, quantity, source, etc.)

11. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS/WASTE (Use/storage/generation, solid waste, etc.)

12. NATURAL RESOURCES (Wetlands/floodplains, flora, fauna, etc.)

13. CULTURAL RESOURCES (Burial sites, archeological, historical, etc.)

14. GEOLOGY AND SOILS (Topography, minerals, geothermal, seismicity, etc.)

15. HOST NATION CONSIDERATIONS/CONCERNS (International agreements, SOFA, FGS, etc.)

16. OTHER (Potential issues/impacts/mitigations not addressed above.)

813-O, November 2015 PAGE 1 OF 3 PAGES

Print Form

In support of the KC-135 bed-down, the SATAF meeting was held 8-11 June 2015 and it was agreed to transfer Bldg 2167 to the 86th Logistics Readiness Squadron to allow relocation of the Flight Service Center from Bldg 2017.

Convert Bldg 2167 to Flight Service Center (FSC) - bring building in compliance with all applicable fire safety standards. Install a Fire Suppression system to comply with Fire Protection Codes.

86 CES/CEIE 86 CES/CENPD

EIC-CONVERT BLDG. 2167 TO FSC(FIRE SAFETY) (TYFR 18-1047)

480-3566

Michele Werstler 17 June 2016

SECTION III - ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS DETERMINATION (Check appropriate box and explain reasoning in Remarks section below.)

17.

PROPOSED ACTION IS NOT A MAJOR FEDERAL ACTION, THEREFORE, NO FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL

IMPACT ANALYSIS IS REQUIRED. (SEE REMARKS IN BLOCK 18 BELOW); OR

PROPOSED ACTION QUALIFIES FOR AN EXEMPTION (SEE REMARKS IN BLOCK 18 BELOW); OR

PROPOSED ACTION QUALIFIES FOR OCATEX #

(SEE REMARKS IN BLOCK 18 BELOW); OR

PROPOSED ACTION WILL NOT CAUSE SIGNIFICANT HARM TO THE ENVIRONMENT OF THE GLOBAL

COMMONS, SO NO FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS IS REQUIRED. SUPPORTING

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT OR COMPLETED OVERSEAS SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL

ANALYSIS (OSEA) CHECKLIST IS ATTACHED. (SEE REMARKS IN BLOCK 18 BELOW); OR

PROPOSED ACTION WILL NOT CAUSE SIGNIFICANT HARM TO THE ENVIRONMENT OF A FOREIGN NATION OR TO A PROTECETD GLOBAL RESOURCE. SUPPORTING OSEA CHECKLIST (IF COMPLETED) IS ATTACHED.

(SEE REMARKS IN BLOCK 18 BELOW)

PROPOSED ACTION WILL CAUSE SIGNIFICANT HARM TO THE ENVIRONMENT OF A FOREIGN COUNTRY OR A PROTECTED GLOBAL RESOURCE REQUIRING FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS IN THE FORM OF AN

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (ER) OR ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY (ES).

(SEE REMARKS IN BLOCK 18 BELOW)

PROPOSED ACTION WILL NOT CAUSE SIGNIFICANT HARM TO THE ENVIRONMENT OF A FOREIGN COUNTRY

OR A PROTECTED GLOBAL RESOURCE, BUT FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS IN

THE FORM OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (ER) OR ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY (ES) IS APPROPRIATE ACCORD

TO LEADERSHIP OR THE EPF. (SEE REMARKS IN BLOCK 18 BELOW)

PROPOSED ACTION WILL CAUSE SIGNIFICANT HARM TO THE ENVIRONMENT OF THE GLOBAL COMMONS E REQUIRING FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS IN THE FORM OF AN OVERSEAS ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT

STATEMENT (OEIS). (SEE REMARKS IN BLOCK 18 BELOW); OR

ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS ANALYSIS IS REQUIRED PER THE TERMS OF AN INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENT

(SEE REMARKS IN BLOCK 18 BELOW).

18. REMARKS

19. ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING FUNCTION

CERTIFICATION (Name, grade and office symbol)

19a. SIGNATURE 19b. DATE

813-O, November 2015 PAGE 2 OF 3 PAGES

Joern E Jeblick, Environmental Branch Chief 13 Jul 16

Building contains Asbestos, please see excerpt of Asbestos database attached. If construction involves ACM, a certified company (according to TRGS 519) is required to do the work. Same goes for AMF, but there is no data on file about the occurrence in that building. Please ensure that any construction debris is disposed of according to German Waste Law. Please ensure that the amount of debris disposed of is reported to 86 CES/CEIE for statistical purposes.

All hazardous materials require an approved AF Form 3952 initiated through the HAZMART, 480-6311 prior to start of work.

Alternate POC is CEIE, 480-5086. Contractors must request approval for hazardous materials from 86 CES/CEIE, Mr. Weber, 480-5086 prior to contract award and/or start of work.

There is an Oil Water Separator (OWS) located southwest of bldg 2167 (see attached map).

REQUEST FOR OVERSEAS ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS

CONTINUATION SHEET

PAGE 3 OF 3 PAGESNovember 2015813-O, Microsoft Word - REQUEST FOR OVERSEAS ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS, 813-O 1231802505C 11.0.1.20130826.2.901444

REQUEST FOR OVERSEAS ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS

Report Control Symbol

RCS: 35-

INSTRUCTIONS

Section I to be completed by Proponent; Sections II and III to be completed by Environmental Planning Function.

Continue on separate sheets as necessary and reference appropriate item numbers.

SECTION I - PROPONENT INFORMATION

1. TO

Environmental Planning Function

2. FROM

Proponent organization and functional address symbol 2a. TELEPHONE

3. TITLE OF PROPOSED ACTION

4. PURPOSE AND NEED FOR ACTION (

Identify decision to be made and need date.

5. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ACTION

Provide sufficient details for adequate evaluation of the proposal.)

6. PROPONENT APPROVAL

Name and Grade 6a. SIGNATURE 6b. DATE

SECTION II

PRELIMINARY ENVIRONMENTAL SURVEY.

(Check appropriate box and describe potential environmental effects including cumulative effects.) (+ = positive effect; O = no effect; - = adverse effect; U = unknown effect) o u

7. NOISE (

On- and off-installation

8. ENCROACHMENT

(Land use, accident potential, etc.)

9. AIR QUALITY

(Emissions, etc.)

10. WATER RESOURCES

(Quality, quantity, source, etc.)

11. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS/WASTE

(Use/storage/generation, solid waste, etc.)

12. NATURAL RESOURCES

(Wetlands/floodplains, flora, fauna, etc.)

13. CULTURAL RESOURCES

(Burial sites, archeological, historical, etc.)

14. GEOLOGY AND SOILS

(Topography, minerals, geothermal, seismicity, etc.)

15. HOST NATION CONSIDERATIONS/CONCERNS

(International agreements, SOFA, FGS, etc.)

16. OTHER

(Potential issues/impacts/mitigations not addressed above.)

813-O, November 2015

PAGE 1 OF 3 PAGES

SECTION III - ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS DETERMINATION

(Check appropriate box and explain reasoning in Remarks section below.)

17.

PROPOSED ACTION IS NOT A MAJOR FEDERAL ACTION, THEREFORE, NO FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL

IMPACT ANALYSIS IS REQUIRED. (SEE REMARKS IN BLOCK 18 BELOW); OR

PROPOSED ACTION QUALIFIES FOR AN EXEMPTION (SEE REMARKS IN BLOCK 18 BELOW); OR

PROPOSED ACTION QUALIFIES FOR OCATEX #

(SEE REMARKS IN BLOCK 18 BELOW); OR

PROPOSED ACTION WILL NOT CAUSE SIGNIFICANT HARM TO THE ENVIRONMENT OF THE GLOBAL

COMMONS, SO NO FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS IS REQUIRED. SUPPORTING

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT OR COMPLETED OVERSEAS SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL

ANALYSIS (OSEA) CHECKLIST IS ATTACHED. (SEE REMARKS IN BLOCK 18 BELOW); OR

PROPOSED ACTION WILL NOT CAUSE SIGNIFICANT HARM TO THE ENVIRONMENT OF A FOREIGN NATION OR TO A PROTECETD GLOBAL RESOURCE. SUPPORTING OSEA CHECKLIST (IF COMPLETED) IS ATTACHED.

(SEE REMARKS IN BLOCK 18 BELOW)

PROPOSED ACTION WILL CAUSE SIGNIFICANT HARM TO THE ENVIRONMENT OF A FOREIGN COUNTRY OR A PROTECTED GLOBAL RESOURCE REQUIRING FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS IN THE FORM OF AN

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (ER) OR ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY (ES).

(SEE REMARKS IN BLOCK 18 BELOW)

PROPOSED ACTION WILL NOT CAUSE SIGNIFICANT HARM TO THE ENVIRONMENT OF A FOREIGN COUNTRY

OR A PROTECTED GLOBAL RESOURCE, BUT FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS IN

THE FORM OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (ER) OR ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY (ES) IS APPROPRIATE ACCORD

TO LEADERSHIP OR THE EPF. (SEE REMARKS IN BLOCK 18 BELOW)

PROPOSED ACTION WILL CAUSE SIGNIFICANT HARM TO THE ENVIRONMENT OF THE GLOBAL COMMONS E REQUIRING FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS IN THE FORM OF AN OVERSEAS ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT

STATEMENT (OEIS). (SEE REMARKS IN BLOCK 18 BELOW); OR

ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS ANALYSIS IS REQUIRED PER THE TERMS OF AN INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENT

(SEE REMARKS IN BLOCK 18 BELOW).

18. REMARKS

19. ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING FUNCTION

CERTIFICATION

Name, grade and office symbol 19a. SIGNATURE 19b. DATE 813-O, November 2015

PAGE 2 OF 3 PAGES

REQUEST FOR OVERSEAS ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS

CONTINUATION SHEET

PAGE 3 OF 3 PAGES

November 2015 813-O,

PrintButton1:
TextField4: In support of the KC-135 bed-down, the SATAF meeting was held 8-11 June 2015 and it was agreed to transfer Bldg 2167 to the 86th Logistics Readiness Squadron to allow relocation of the Flight Service Center from Bldg 2017.
CheckBox1: 0
CheckBox1: 0
CheckBox1: 0
CheckBox1: 0
CheckBox1: 0
CheckBox1: 0
CheckBox1: 0
CheckBox1: 0
CheckBox1: 0
CheckBox1: 0
CheckBox1: 1
CheckBox1: 1
CheckBox1: 1
CheckBox1: 1
CheckBox1: 1
CheckBox1: 1
CheckBox1: 1
CheckBox1: 1
CheckBox1: 1
CheckBox1: 1
CheckBox1: 0
CheckBox1: 0
CheckBox1: 0
CheckBox1: 0
CheckBox1: 0
CheckBox1: 0
CheckBox1: 0
CheckBox1: 0
CheckBox1: 0
CheckBox1: 0
CheckBox1: 0
CheckBox1: 0
CheckBox1: 0
CheckBox1: 0
CheckBox1: 0
CheckBox1: 0
CheckBox1: 0
CheckBox1: 0
CheckBox1: 0
CheckBox1: 0
CheckBox1: 1
CheckBox1: 0
CheckBox1: 0
CheckBox1: 0
CheckBox1: 0
CheckBox1: 0
CheckBox1: 0
CheckBox1: 0
CheckBox1: 0
TextField5: Convert Bldg 2167 to Flight Service Center (FSC) - bring building in compliance with all applicable fire safety standards. Install a Fire Suppression system to comply with Fire Protection Codes.
TextField1: 86 CES/CEIE
TextField2: 86 CES/CENPD
TextField3: EIC-CONVERT BLDG. 2167 TO FSC(FIRE SAFETY) (TYFR 18-1047)
TextFieldrcs:
TextField2A: 480-3566
TextField6: Michele Werstler
TextField6B: 17 June 2016
SignatureField1:
SignatureField2:
TextField19: Joern E Jeblick, Environmental Branch Chief
TextField19b: 13 Jul 16
TextField17:
TextField18:

Building contains Asbestos, please see excerpt of Asbestos database attached. If construction involves ACM, a certified company (according to TRGS 519) is required to do the work. Same goes for AMF, but there is no data on file about the occurrence in that building. Please ensure that any construction debris is disposed of according to German Waste Law. Please ensure that the amount of debris disposed of is reported to 86 CES/CEIE for statistical purposes.

All hazardous materials require an approved AF Form 3952 initiated through the HAZMART, 480-6311 prior to start of work. Alternate POC is CEIE, 480-5086. Contractors must request approval for hazardous materials from 86 CES/CEIE, Mr. Weber, 480-5086 prior to contract award and/or start of work.

There is an Oil Water Separator (OWS) located southwest of bldg 2167 (see attached map).

TextField18b:

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .