RFP_Atch_5d_-_Env_Impact_Study_AF813_TYFR_18-1047.pdf
PDF 911 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Multiple Award Construction Contract (MACC) Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA5613-19-R-0003
About this file
This document summarizes a solicitation for a Multiple Award Construction Contract to provide design-build, sustainment, maintenance, alteration, repair, renovation, and minor construction projects at various federal and military installations within the Kaiserslautern Military Community and at Ramstein and Spangdahlem Air Bases in Germany. The Air Force intends to award up to five indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity contracts worth a total of $425 million over five years. Task orders will range from $1,000 to $5 million and include a design-build seed project between $1 million and $5 million at Ramstein Air Base. The solicitation is expected to be released on November 1, 2018, with proposals due December 1, 2018. A pre-proposal conference will be held approximately 7 to 10 days later. All contractors must register in the System for Award Management to receive an award.
RFP Atch 5d - Environmental Impact Study for Seed Project
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 50
Multiple Award Construction Contract (MACC) has more files on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
REQUEST FOR OVERSEAS ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
Report Control Symbol
RCS: 35-
INSTRUCTIONS: Section I to be completed by Proponent; Sections II and III to be completed by Environmental Planning Function.
Continue on separate sheets as necessary and reference appropriate item numbers.
SECTION I - PROPONENT INFORMATION
1. TO (Environmental Planning Function) 2. FROM (Proponent organization and functional address symbol) 2a. TELEPHONE
3. TITLE OF PROPOSED ACTION
4. PURPOSE AND NEED FOR ACTION ( Identify decision to be made and need date.)
5. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ACTION (Provide sufficient details for adequate evaluation of the proposal.)
6. PROPONENT APPROVAL (Name and Grade) 6a. SIGNATURE 6b. DATE
SECTION II PRELIMINARY ENVIRONMENTAL SURVEY. (Check appropriate box and describe potential environmental effects including cumulative effects.) (+ = positive effect; O = no effect; - = adverse effect; U = unknown effect)
+ o - u
7. NOISE (On- and off-installation)
8. ENCROACHMENT (Land use, accident potential, etc.)
9. AIR QUALITY (Emissions, etc.)
10. WATER RESOURCES (Quality, quantity, source, etc.)
11. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS/WASTE (Use/storage/generation, solid waste, etc.)
12. NATURAL RESOURCES (Wetlands/floodplains, flora, fauna, etc.)
13. CULTURAL RESOURCES (Burial sites, archeological, historical, etc.)
14. GEOLOGY AND SOILS (Topography, minerals, geothermal, seismicity, etc.)
15. HOST NATION CONSIDERATIONS/CONCERNS (International agreements, SOFA, FGS, etc.)
16. OTHER (Potential issues/impacts/mitigations not addressed above.)
813-O, November 2015 PAGE 1 OF 3 PAGES
Print Form
In support of the KC-135 bed-down, the SATAF meeting was held 8-11 June 2015 and it was agreed to transfer Bldg 2167 to the 86th Logistics Readiness Squadron to allow relocation of the Flight Service Center from Bldg 2017.
Convert Bldg 2167 to Flight Service Center (FSC) - bring building in compliance with all applicable fire safety standards. Install a Fire Suppression system to comply with Fire Protection Codes.
86 CES/CEIE 86 CES/CENPD
EIC-CONVERT BLDG. 2167 TO FSC(FIRE SAFETY) (TYFR 18-1047)
480-3566
Michele Werstler 17 June 2016
SECTION III - ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS DETERMINATION (Check appropriate box and explain reasoning in Remarks section below.)
17.
PROPOSED ACTION IS NOT A MAJOR FEDERAL ACTION, THEREFORE, NO FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACT ANALYSIS IS REQUIRED. (SEE REMARKS IN BLOCK 18 BELOW); OR
PROPOSED ACTION QUALIFIES FOR AN EXEMPTION (SEE REMARKS IN BLOCK 18 BELOW); OR
PROPOSED ACTION QUALIFIES FOR OCATEX #
(SEE REMARKS IN BLOCK 18 BELOW); OR
PROPOSED ACTION WILL NOT CAUSE SIGNIFICANT HARM TO THE ENVIRONMENT OF THE GLOBAL
COMMONS, SO NO FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS IS REQUIRED. SUPPORTING
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT OR COMPLETED OVERSEAS SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL
ANALYSIS (OSEA) CHECKLIST IS ATTACHED. (SEE REMARKS IN BLOCK 18 BELOW); OR
PROPOSED ACTION WILL NOT CAUSE SIGNIFICANT HARM TO THE ENVIRONMENT OF A FOREIGN NATION OR TO A PROTECETD GLOBAL RESOURCE. SUPPORTING OSEA CHECKLIST (IF COMPLETED) IS ATTACHED.
(SEE REMARKS IN BLOCK 18 BELOW)
PROPOSED ACTION WILL CAUSE SIGNIFICANT HARM TO THE ENVIRONMENT OF A FOREIGN COUNTRY OR A PROTECTED GLOBAL RESOURCE REQUIRING FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS IN THE FORM OF AN
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (ER) OR ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY (ES).
(SEE REMARKS IN BLOCK 18 BELOW)
PROPOSED ACTION WILL NOT CAUSE SIGNIFICANT HARM TO THE ENVIRONMENT OF A FOREIGN COUNTRY
OR A PROTECTED GLOBAL RESOURCE, BUT FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS IN
THE FORM OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (ER) OR ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY (ES) IS APPROPRIATE ACCORD
TO LEADERSHIP OR THE EPF. (SEE REMARKS IN BLOCK 18 BELOW)
PROPOSED ACTION WILL CAUSE SIGNIFICANT HARM TO THE ENVIRONMENT OF THE GLOBAL COMMONS E REQUIRING FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS IN THE FORM OF AN OVERSEAS ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
STATEMENT (OEIS). (SEE REMARKS IN BLOCK 18 BELOW); OR
ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS ANALYSIS IS REQUIRED PER THE TERMS OF AN INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENT
(SEE REMARKS IN BLOCK 18 BELOW).
18. REMARKS
19. ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING FUNCTION
CERTIFICATION (Name, grade and office symbol)
19a. SIGNATURE 19b. DATE
813-O, November 2015 PAGE 2 OF 3 PAGES
Joern E Jeblick, Environmental Branch Chief 13 Jul 16
Building contains Asbestos, please see excerpt of Asbestos database attached. If construction involves ACM, a certified company (according to TRGS 519) is required to do the work. Same goes for AMF, but there is no data on file about the occurrence in that building. Please ensure that any construction debris is disposed of according to German Waste Law. Please ensure that the amount of debris disposed of is reported to 86 CES/CEIE for statistical purposes.
All hazardous materials require an approved AF Form 3952 initiated through the HAZMART, 480-6311 prior to start of work.
Alternate POC is CEIE, 480-5086. Contractors must request approval for hazardous materials from 86 CES/CEIE, Mr. Weber, 480-5086 prior to contract award and/or start of work.
There is an Oil Water Separator (OWS) located southwest of bldg 2167 (see attached map).
REQUEST FOR OVERSEAS ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
CONTINUATION SHEET
PAGE 3 OF 3 PAGESNovember 2015813-O, Microsoft Word - REQUEST FOR OVERSEAS ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS, 813-O 1231802505C 11.0.1.20130826.2.901444
REQUEST FOR OVERSEAS ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
Report Control Symbol
RCS: 35-
INSTRUCTIONS
Section I to be completed by Proponent; Sections II and III to be completed by Environmental Planning Function.
Continue on separate sheets as necessary and reference appropriate item numbers.
SECTION I - PROPONENT INFORMATION
1. TO
Environmental Planning Function
2. FROM
Proponent organization and functional address symbol 2a. TELEPHONE
3. TITLE OF PROPOSED ACTION
4. PURPOSE AND NEED FOR ACTION (
Identify decision to be made and need date.
5. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ACTION
Provide sufficient details for adequate evaluation of the proposal.)
6. PROPONENT APPROVAL
Name and Grade 6a. SIGNATURE 6b. DATE
SECTION II
PRELIMINARY ENVIRONMENTAL SURVEY.
(Check appropriate box and describe potential environmental effects including cumulative effects.) (+ = positive effect; O = no effect; - = adverse effect; U = unknown effect) o u
7. NOISE (
On- and off-installation
8. ENCROACHMENT
(Land use, accident potential, etc.)
9. AIR QUALITY
(Emissions, etc.)
10. WATER RESOURCES
(Quality, quantity, source, etc.)
11. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS/WASTE
(Use/storage/generation, solid waste, etc.)
12. NATURAL RESOURCES
(Wetlands/floodplains, flora, fauna, etc.)
13. CULTURAL RESOURCES
(Burial sites, archeological, historical, etc.)
14. GEOLOGY AND SOILS
(Topography, minerals, geothermal, seismicity, etc.)
15. HOST NATION CONSIDERATIONS/CONCERNS
(International agreements, SOFA, FGS, etc.)
16. OTHER
(Potential issues/impacts/mitigations not addressed above.)
813-O, November 2015
PAGE 1 OF 3 PAGES
SECTION III - ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS DETERMINATION
(Check appropriate box and explain reasoning in Remarks section below.)
17.
PROPOSED ACTION IS NOT A MAJOR FEDERAL ACTION, THEREFORE, NO FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACT ANALYSIS IS REQUIRED. (SEE REMARKS IN BLOCK 18 BELOW); OR
PROPOSED ACTION QUALIFIES FOR AN EXEMPTION (SEE REMARKS IN BLOCK 18 BELOW); OR
PROPOSED ACTION QUALIFIES FOR OCATEX #
(SEE REMARKS IN BLOCK 18 BELOW); OR
PROPOSED ACTION WILL NOT CAUSE SIGNIFICANT HARM TO THE ENVIRONMENT OF THE GLOBAL
COMMONS, SO NO FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS IS REQUIRED. SUPPORTING
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT OR COMPLETED OVERSEAS SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL
ANALYSIS (OSEA) CHECKLIST IS ATTACHED. (SEE REMARKS IN BLOCK 18 BELOW); OR
PROPOSED ACTION WILL NOT CAUSE SIGNIFICANT HARM TO THE ENVIRONMENT OF A FOREIGN NATION OR TO A PROTECETD GLOBAL RESOURCE. SUPPORTING OSEA CHECKLIST (IF COMPLETED) IS ATTACHED.
(SEE REMARKS IN BLOCK 18 BELOW)
PROPOSED ACTION WILL CAUSE SIGNIFICANT HARM TO THE ENVIRONMENT OF A FOREIGN COUNTRY OR A PROTECTED GLOBAL RESOURCE REQUIRING FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS IN THE FORM OF AN
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (ER) OR ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY (ES).
(SEE REMARKS IN BLOCK 18 BELOW)
PROPOSED ACTION WILL NOT CAUSE SIGNIFICANT HARM TO THE ENVIRONMENT OF A FOREIGN COUNTRY
OR A PROTECTED GLOBAL RESOURCE, BUT FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS IN
THE FORM OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (ER) OR ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY (ES) IS APPROPRIATE ACCORD
TO LEADERSHIP OR THE EPF. (SEE REMARKS IN BLOCK 18 BELOW)
PROPOSED ACTION WILL CAUSE SIGNIFICANT HARM TO THE ENVIRONMENT OF THE GLOBAL COMMONS E REQUIRING FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS IN THE FORM OF AN OVERSEAS ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
STATEMENT (OEIS). (SEE REMARKS IN BLOCK 18 BELOW); OR
ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS ANALYSIS IS REQUIRED PER THE TERMS OF AN INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENT
(SEE REMARKS IN BLOCK 18 BELOW).
18. REMARKS
19. ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING FUNCTION
CERTIFICATION
Name, grade and office symbol 19a. SIGNATURE 19b. DATE 813-O, November 2015
PAGE 2 OF 3 PAGES
REQUEST FOR OVERSEAS ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
CONTINUATION SHEET
PAGE 3 OF 3 PAGES
November 2015 813-O,
| PrintButton1: |
| TextField4: In support of the KC-135 bed-down, the SATAF meeting was held 8-11 June 2015 and it was agreed to transfer Bldg 2167 to the 86th Logistics Readiness Squadron to allow relocation of the Flight Service Center from Bldg 2017. |
| CheckBox1: 0 |
| CheckBox1: 0 |
| CheckBox1: 0 |
| CheckBox1: 0 |
| CheckBox1: 0 |
| CheckBox1: 0 |
| CheckBox1: 0 |
| CheckBox1: 0 |
| CheckBox1: 0 |
| CheckBox1: 0 |
| CheckBox1: 1 |
| CheckBox1: 1 |
| CheckBox1: 1 |
| CheckBox1: 1 |
| CheckBox1: 1 |
| CheckBox1: 1 |
| CheckBox1: 1 |
| CheckBox1: 1 |
| CheckBox1: 1 |
| CheckBox1: 1 |
| CheckBox1: 0 |
| CheckBox1: 0 |
| CheckBox1: 0 |
| CheckBox1: 0 |
| CheckBox1: 0 |
| CheckBox1: 0 |
| CheckBox1: 0 |
| CheckBox1: 0 |
| CheckBox1: 0 |
| CheckBox1: 0 |
| CheckBox1: 0 |
| CheckBox1: 0 |
| CheckBox1: 0 |
| CheckBox1: 0 |
| CheckBox1: 0 |
| CheckBox1: 0 |
| CheckBox1: 0 |
| CheckBox1: 0 |
| CheckBox1: 0 |
| CheckBox1: 0 |
| CheckBox1: 1 |
| CheckBox1: 0 |
| CheckBox1: 0 |
| CheckBox1: 0 |
| CheckBox1: 0 |
| CheckBox1: 0 |
| CheckBox1: 0 |
| CheckBox1: 0 |
| CheckBox1: 0 |
| TextField5: Convert Bldg 2167 to Flight Service Center (FSC) - bring building in compliance with all applicable fire safety standards. Install a Fire Suppression system to comply with Fire Protection Codes. |
| TextField1: 86 CES/CEIE |
| TextField2: 86 CES/CENPD |
| TextField3: EIC-CONVERT BLDG. 2167 TO FSC(FIRE SAFETY) (TYFR 18-1047) |
| TextFieldrcs: |
| TextField2A: 480-3566 |
| TextField6: Michele Werstler |
| TextField6B: 17 June 2016 |
| SignatureField1: |
| SignatureField2: |
| TextField19: Joern E Jeblick, Environmental Branch Chief |
| TextField19b: 13 Jul 16 |
| TextField17: |
| TextField18: |
Building contains Asbestos, please see excerpt of Asbestos database attached. If construction involves ACM, a certified company (according to TRGS 519) is required to do the work. Same goes for AMF, but there is no data on file about the occurrence in that building. Please ensure that any construction debris is disposed of according to German Waste Law. Please ensure that the amount of debris disposed of is reported to 86 CES/CEIE for statistical purposes.
All hazardous materials require an approved AF Form 3952 initiated through the HAZMART, 480-6311 prior to start of work. Alternate POC is CEIE, 480-5086. Contractors must request approval for hazardous materials from 86 CES/CEIE, Mr. Weber, 480-5086 prior to contract award and/or start of work.
There is an Oil Water Separator (OWS) located southwest of bldg 2167 (see attached map).
TextField18b:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .