The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.
Sheet1
| PROJECT DESCRIPTION: | ARCHITECT-ENGINEER DESIGN SERVICES IDIQ | DATE: |
| PROJECT NUMBER: | | |
| 496 ABS CIVIL ENGINEERING FLIGHT |
| Morón AB, Spain |
| EVALUATION OF ARCHITECT-ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONS (SF330) SUBMISSIONS |
| FIRM | | CRITERIA # (see below) | | | | | TOTAL | COMMENTS |
| | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | | |
| | | | | | | 0 | |
| | | | | | | 0 | |
| | | | | | | 0 | |
| | | | | | | 0 | |
| | | | | | | 0 | |
| | | | | | | 0 | |
| | | | | | | 0 | |
| | | | | | | 0 | |
| Criteria #: | | | | | | | | |
| 1. Proffessional qualifications of key personnel of the firm/teaming arrangement (25 points) [education, training, project experience, professional registration of key personnel, depth and experience of firm/team firms.] | | | | | | | | |
| - Give 15 to 25 points for highly qualified staff. | | | | | | | |
| - Give 7 to 14 points for qualified staff. | | | | | | | |
| - Give 1 to 6 points where staff has limited qualifications. | | | | | | | |
| 2, Specialized experience and technical competence (25 points) [Effectiveness of proposed design teams, coordination of disciplines, offices, and subcontractors for projects in the last five years] | |
| - Give 15 to 25 points for high excellence and quality of diverse and high complexity of projects and with high sustainable design factors incorporated to designs. |
| - Give 7 to 14 points for medium excellence and quality of diverse and medium to high complexity of projects and with sustainable design factors incorporated to designs. |
| - Give 1 to 6 points for low excellence and quality of non-diverse and low complexity of projects and without sustainable design factors incorporated to designs. |
| 3. Capacity to accomplish the work in the required time (20 points) [based on amount of work currently being performed, size of firm, number of partners and/or subcontractors] | |
| - Give 14 to 20 points for well-recognized ability to do the work on time. |
| - Give 8 to 13 points for adequate ability to do the work on time. |
| - Give 1 to 7 points for limited ability to do the work on time. |
| 4. Past performance with Government agencies and/or private industry (15 points) [based on past performance in terms of cost control, quality of work and compliance with performance schedules) | |
| - Give 11 to 15 points for history of high quality, on time or ahead of schedule, and within cost. |
| - Give 6 to 10 points for history of good quality, on schedule, and within cost. |
| - Give 1 to 5 points for history of less than adequate quality, problems meeting schedules, or recurrent problems staying within cost. |
| 5. Location in the general geographical area of the project and knowledge of the locality of the project (15 points) [based on locations of the firm's main office and sub-consultants offices that will be directly involved with this contract, in order to provide timely response to request for on-site support] | |
| - Give 15 points for firms located within 100 km from Morón Air Base and with all design team members also located within that distance. |
| - Give 10 points for firms located further than 100 km but within 500 km from Morón Air Base with some design team members located outside that distance but within Spain. |
| - Give 5 points for firms located beyond 500 km from Morón Air Base and with some design team members located outside of Spain. |
| - Give 0 points for firms located outside of Spain, even with design team members located in Spain. |
Max Points Available: 100 Points
Sheet2
Sheet3