Updated Limited Asbestos NESHAP_LBP Survey.pdf

ruMACTEC engineering ond consiructing o better tomorrow

Marclr ?-4,2009

Ms. Ljsa Currie, Contract Specialist Chugach Management Services, Inc.

P.O. Box 6349 Tampa, Flonda 33608-0349

Phonc: Bl3-828-l l7l Fax: 813-924-5207 E-mail : lisa.curi e.ctr(@.macdill.af.mil

Sublect: Report of Limited Asbestos NESIIAP and Lead-Based Paint Survey Hangar 2 Restrooms - Designated Areas MacDill Air Force Base Tampa, Floritla MACTEC Project 6520-09-0752.07

Via e-mail & l" Class Mail Dear Ms. Curie:

MACTEC Engineerìng and Consulting, Inc. (MACTEC) has completed the Limited NESHAP Asbestos and Lead-Based Paint Survey of the Hangar 2 designated areas located in Tampa, Florida. These services were provrded in accordance with the MACTEC Proposal

PROPO9TMPA-35, dated February 24,2009. This report, consisting of 12 pages of narrative and

2 appendices, must be considered and utilized in its entirety.

We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you and look forward to our continued association. If you should have any questions concerning this report, please contact us at your convenrence.

Sincerely, MACTEC ENGINEERING AND CONSULTING, INC.

Asbestos Business License No. ZA-0000116

Cûrl t 1)^^^^ * Carol L. Thonra, MPH Project Manager

MACTEC Engineering ond Consulting, lnc.

4919W. Lourel Streel . Tompo, F|,33607 ¡ Phone: 813.289.0750.813.289.5474 dþttúÀ ithpermission

Russell E. Stauffer, P.E.

Florida Asbestos Consultant License Number EA-00000 1 6

P:\f'ÀCILl112009lProiecrs\ó520-09-0152 Mtc Dill Hongtr 2 RR NESHAP\Reporr\MtcDill Hangor 2 Restrooms LBP & ACM-NESHAP.doc

Distribution: Addressee (2) File (l) www.moclec.com

Hangar 2 Restroonts, MacDill AFB, Tanrpa, Florida MACTEC Project 6520-09-0 I 52.0 l

March 24,2009 Report of Linrited NESHAP Asbestos and

Lead-Based Paint Survey

1.0

2.0

3.0

TABLE OF'CONTENTS

Page

BACKGROTIND INFORMATION

PROJECT INFORMATION SUMMARY

SURVEY PROCEDURES

3.1 ASBESTOS SURVEYPROCEDURES........... .......,

3.2 LEAD-BASED COATING SURVEY PROCEDURES

RESULTS OF LABORATORY 4N4LYS8S

4.r ASBESTOS

4.2 LEAD-BASED COATINGS

RECOMMENDATIONS

5.1 ASBESTOS

5.2 LEAD-BASED CO4TINGS

5.0

6.0 QUALIFICATIONS

APPENDD(A: ASBESTOS

Sample Locations Laboratory Results

Cerlifications

LEAD

Lead-Based Paint Testing Results

Certifications

APPENDIXB:

1.0 BACKGROUND INX'ORMATION

Hangar 2 Restrooms, MacDilt AFB, Tantpa, Floricla March 24' 2009

MAõrøC rro¡ect 6520-09-0152.01 Report of Líntited NESHAP Asbestos and Lead-Based Paint SurveY

2.0 PROJECT INFORMATION SUMMARY

MACTEC PROJECT NUMBER 6520-09-0r52.01

FACILITY NAME Hangar 2 Restrooms

FACILITY ADDRESS MacDill AFB, Tampa, Florida

TYPE OF'F'ACILITY Aircraft Hangar

APPROX. SQUARE FOOTAGB

8OO SF

(2 existins Restrooms & 2 Proposed Restrooms only)

O C CUPIED/NON-O C CTJPIED Occupied

AREAS NOT ACCESSIBLE None

DATES OF'INSPECTION March 13,2009

ACCREDITED INSPECTORS Pete MacKay, Carol Thoma

Hangar 2 ResÍroonts, MacDill AFB' MACTEC Project 6520-09-0152 0I

March 24, 2009

Report of Linited NESHAP Asbestos and Lead-Based Paint SurveY

PROCEDURES

Tantpa, Florida

3.0 SURVEY

3.1 ASBESTOS ST]RVEY PROCEDI]RES

3.1.1 General

The focus of the NESHAP Asbestos survey lvas to locate, identify, and sample designated materials, which were suspected to contain asbestiform minerals. The presence of friable and non-friable suspect asbestos containrng materials (ACM) encountered during the survey is addressed in this report. Friable materials, when dry, will crumble and release fibers under normal hand pressure.

We must emphasize that this swvey was limited to the accessible designated areas, as it was not possible to look within every possible in-accessible location in the occupied building. This survey documents only general locations of suspect materials and does not determine the exact boundaries. No attempt was made to demolish structural elements and finishes or mechanical equipment, as this is beyond the scope of our authorized services. Due to these limitations' operating mechanical equipment, wall voids, building cavities, and other areas may contain unobserved ACM.

3.1.2 Bulk Sampling Procedures

The bulk sampling procedures used for the collection of suspect ACM first required the establishment of homogeneous sampling areas, which are defined as areas of materials of the same type and applied during the same general time period. The homogeneous sampling areas were then examined, and representative samples of suspect materials were obtained from these areas.

The EpA has published guidelines and recommendations for obtaining samples of ACM. These guidelines were followed during our survey, where appropriate. Additionally, samples of these materials were obtained at the discretion of our personnel based on past experience.

Bulk samples collected during the site survey were analyzed by Polarized Light Microscopy

(pLM) coupled with dispersion staining in accordance with EPA Method 600/R-93/116.

Hangar 2 Reslrooms, MacDill AFB, Tampa, Florida MACTEC Pro.i ect 6 5 2 0-0 9 -0 I 5 2. 0 I

March 24, 2009

Report of Lintited NESHAP Asbeslos attd Lead-Based Painl SurveY

PLM is an aîalytical method for asbestos identification, which depends on the unique optical properties of mineral forms in the samples and specifically identified the various asbestos tlpes.

The optical properties are a result of the mineral's chemical composition, physical atomic structure, and visual morphology. This is the mandated method of analysis by EPA for asbestos identification in bulk samples. The samples were shipped to Cates Laboratories, which has attained National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) accreditation Number 200569-0 through participation in the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP)'

3.1.3 Ilomogeneous Sampling Areas

Forty-eight samples of suspect ACM were obtained during this survey from the Hangat 2 designated areas and are outlined as follows:

. Ceramic Floor Tile

. Ceramic Wall Tile

. Ceiling Tile o Drywall& Joint Compound . HVAC Duct Mastic o Sink Caulk . Vinyl Floor Tile . Vinyl Cove Base . Pipe hrsulation ¡ Carpet Adhesive . Plumbing Caulk

LEAD-BASED COATING SI]R\'EY PROCEDURES

3.2.1 Survey Overview

MACTEC obtained 65 (including6 caTlbration tests) testreadings on interior and exterior coated surfaces. This testing was conducted on March 13,2009, by Ms. Carol Thoma of MACTEC's

Tampa office using select portions of Chapter 7 of Housing and Urban Development (HUD)

Guidelines for the Evaluation and Control of Lead-Based Paint Hazards in Housing (1997 revision), to document whether lead-based coatings were present. The results, to assist in compliance with requirements of Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), are

3.2

Hangar 2 Restt'oottts, MacDill AFB, Tanrpa, Florida MACTEC Proj ect 65 20-09-0 I 5 2.0 I reported in a fonnat that documents which surfaces afe covefed with of certifications of MACTEC personnel performing the lead-based

Appendix B of this report.

March 24, 2009 Report of Limited NESHAP Asbestos and

Lead-Based Paint SurveY lead-based coatings. Copies paint survey are provided in

Assuming the interior and exterior components of the building areas not tested were painted at the same time and with the same type of paint as those building areas tested, it is reasonable to assume that similar X-ray Fluorescence (XRF) test results on the same components as those tested would be documented.

3.2,2 Regulatory Definition of Lead-Based Paint

3.2.2.1 HUD has defined lead-based paint as coatings where the concentration of lead is equal to or exceeds either of 1.0 milligram or lead per square centimeter of surface area

(1.0milligram per square centimeter (mg/cm2)), when tested by XRF or 0.5 percent by weight when analyzedby laboratory methods.

3.2.2.2 EPA has defined lead-based paint as coatings where the concentration of lead is equal to or exceeds either of 7.0 mglcmz, when tested by XRF or 0.5 percent by weight when analyzed by laboratory methods.

3.2.2.3 In 1998, the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) banned coatings for non-industrial applications where the concentration of lead is equal to or exceeds 600 parts per million (ppm) or 0.06 percent be weight in the dry film.

3.2.2.4 OSHA doe s not have a definition of lead-based paint. Instead, OSHA addresses lead that can become airbome if coatings containing any concentrations of lead are disturbed during construction activities.

3.2.3 Methodology

The XRF used for this survey was the NITON Model XL-309, Serial No. U2636NR3897' The instrument provides an almost instantaneous measurement of the lead content of the material being tested inmglcrnz.

March 24, 2009

Report of Lìmited NESHAP Asbestos and Lead-B ased P ainÍ Survelt

The XRF operator was Ms. Carol Thomai an EPA-licensed Lead hspector/Risk Assessor from

MACTEC's Tampa, Florida office. The specific test locations are identified in the field test results sheets in Appendix B of this roport.

3.2.4 Testing Results

Of the 64 tests (includíng 6 calibrationreadings), 10 showedlead concentrations at or abovethe

EPA/IIUD definition of lead-based paint (at or above 1.0 rnflanf) on üested interior coatings.

Fourteen vadous other components were docuinented to have lead concentrations present, but at levels below the EPAÆIUD level. The remaining tested component coatings were below the detection limit of the instrument.

NOTE: Companents docuwented as not exceeding the HLID/EPA thteshold.st may coniøìn lowet eoncentrations of leød which, ìf elisturbed, møy rélease sfficìent lead to exeeed øirbonte cancenfiøtìo.ns ahot'e the OSHA

Action Le:v¿l or Peruissíltle Expasure Limíf'

Hangar 2 Restrooms, MacDill AFB, Tantpa, Florida MACTEC Project 6520-09-0152 01

4.I ASBESTOS

March 24, 2009 Report of Limîted NESHAP Asbestos and

Lead-Based Painl Survey

4.0 RESULTS OF LABORATORY ANALYSES

Asbestos Laboratory Analysis

H.A. SAMPLE

MATERIAL

DESCRIPTION

SAMPLE LOCATION ASBESTOS

*APPROX.

OUAI\TITY

NESHAP

CATEGORY

RECOMMENDATIONS

& COMMENTS

flangar 2 Restrooms

F1 7,2 2" Ceramic Floor Tile

(Beige w/ Brown Specs) 1't Floor, Existing Restroom #1 ND w1 4,5 4" Ceramic Wall Tile lBeise) l't Floor, Existing Restroom #1 ND

C1 1-9 2' x2'Ceiling Tile íWormhole) l" Floor, Existing Restroom #1;

2nd Floor, New Restroom #3

ND

w2 t0-12 Drywall & Joint

Compound lSmooth Texture)

1't Floor, Existing Restroom #l;2"d Floor, Existing Restroom #4

ND

MSl t3 15 HVAC Duct Mastic (White)& Insulation

1't Floor, Existing Restroom #1; 1" Floor, New Restroom#Z;2nd Floor, New

Restroom #3

ND

MS2 16

HVAC Duct Mastic lGrav) 1't Floor, Existing Restroom #1 ND

MS3 19,20

Sink Caulk lWhite) 1" Floor, Existing Restroom #1 ND

F2 )) )7

12" Yinyl Floor Tile & Mastic

(Gray w,lDark Gray Streaks)

1" Floor, New Restroom#2 ND

LEGEND:

H.A. : Homogeneous Area of Material ND : None Detected

SF Square Feet LF : Linear Feet

Asbestos detected is shown in bold t1pe. All Asbestos detected is Chrysotile, unless noted otherwise.

Samples 3,6,17,18,21,24,33,36,42 not used.

CheckedUy, ff

Hangar 2 Reslroonts, MacDill AFB, Tampa, Florida MACTEC Project 6 5 2 0-09-0 I 5 2.0 I

March 24, 2009 Report of Limited NESHAP Asbestos and

Lead- Based P aint Survey

Asbestos Laboratory Analysis

II.A. SAMPLE

MATERTAL

DESCRIPTION

SAMPLE LOCATION ASBESTOS

*APPROX.

OUANTITY

NESHAP

CATEGORY

RECOMMENDATIONS

& COMMENTS

MS4 2s -27 4" Vinyl Covebase

(Gray) 1't Floor, New Restroom#2;

2"d Floor, New Restroom #3

ND

w3 28-30 Drywall& Joint

Compound lRoush Texture)

1't Floor, New Restroom#2;

2"d Floor, New Restroom #3

ND

C2 31,32 2'X2' Ceiling Tile (Smooth Texture)

1" Floor, New Restroom#2 ND

MS5 34,35

2" Pipe Insulation & Foil

Wrap (White) 1" Floor, New Restroom#2 5%

(insulation)

15 LF

F3 37 -39 Carpet & Mastic

(Green) 2"d Floor, New Restroom #3 ND

F4 40,41 2" Ceramic Floor Tile lBrown) 2"d Floor, Existing Restroom #4 ND w4 43,44 4" Ceramic Wall Tile

(Lt. Brown) 2"d Floor, Existing Restroom #4 ND

MS6 45,46

Sink Caulk

(white) 2nd Floor, Existing Restroom #4 ND

MS7 47,48

Plumbing Caulk

(White) 2"d Floor, Existing Restroom #4 ND

LEGEND:

H.A. : Homogeneous Area of Material SF Square Feet

ND : None Detected LF : Linear Feet

Asbestos detected is shown in bold t)æe. Alt Asbestos detected is Chrysotile, unless noted otherwise.

Samples 3,6,17,18,21,24,33,36,42 not used.

Checked Or, CT

Hangar 2 Restroonts, MacDitt AFB, Tantpa, Florida March 24' 2009

M,IðTEC ero¡ect 6520-09-0152.01 Report of Limited NESHAP Asbestos and Lead-B ased Paint SurveY

4.2 LEAD-BASED COATINGS

See Appendix B for the Lead-Based Coatrngs Results.

5.0 RECOMMENDATIONS

5.1 ASBESTOS

The following section outlines our assessments and recoÍìmendations for the ACM identified in

MACTEC's survey within the Hangar 2 designated areas:

Friable o Pipe Insulation

Category I Non-Friable o None

Category II Non-X'riable o None

Overview Recommendations

In its normal state, the materials were observed to be in generally good condition with a low potential for disturbance.

We recommend that these materials be removed prior to any disturbance during repair, renovation, or demolition that would dislodge or similarly break up the material. If subjected to activities that would cause the materials to become Regulated Asbestos-Containing Materials (RACM), they should be removed as such. Removal as RACM would also apply if the materials, or the substrates to which they are adhered, were planned to be co-mingled with normal construction debris and/or subject to recycling activities which would also break up the materials.

Hangar 2 Restroonts, MacDill AFB, Tampa, Florida MACTEC Proj ect 65 2 0-09-0 I 52. 0 1

March 24, 2009 Report of Linrited NESHAP Asbestos and

Lead-B ased Paint Survey

The materials being removed mì,rst be removed in compliance with Chapter 469, Florida Statutes, fypically by a State Licensed Asbestos Abatement Contractor. These materials must also be removed in compliance with the requirements of the OSHA. Likewise, it is recommended that removals to be conducted incorporatrng the delineation, control, and documentation of Technical

Specifications/B idding Documents.

5.2 LEAD-BASED COATINGS

The disturbance of lead containing painted surfaces should also be addressed in accordance with

OSHA Construction Standard for Lead (29 CFR 1,926.62). The OSHA Lead Regulations include provisions for training; written compliance programs; exposure assessments; notifications;

engineering controls; and specified work practices. Also, based on the concentration of lead identrfied, any waste generated by operations that would disturb these materials should be considered potentially hazardous and waste characterization (including TCLP testing) should be perforrned by the contractor, prior to off-site waste shipment, in a manner of other than construction debris, to determine the proper disposal requirements.

t2

Hangar 2 Restroonts, MacDill AFB, Tanrpa, FLorida

MACTEC Proiect 6520-09-0152 0l March 24,2009

Report of Limited NESHAP Asbestos and Lead-Based Paint SurveY

6.0 QUALTFTCATTONS

MACTEC has endeavored to observe the existing conditions at the designated areas of the facility using generally accepted procedures. Regardless of the thoroughness of a survey, there is always the possibility that some areas were overlooked, inaccessible, or different from those at specific sample locations. Therefore, conditions at every location may not be as anticipated and as summarized in this report. In addition, ïenovation or demolition may uncover altered or differing conditions. We recommend that you notify MACTEC if any changed conditions are encountered so that we can assess the situation and its impact on out original recoÍìmendations.

This report is intended for the exclusive use of Chugach Management Services, Inc. This survey was not intended to be or developed as a substitute for project-specific Bidding or Contract

Documents. Use of this report or reliance upon information contained in this report by any other party acts as an agreement by fhatpafiy to the same terms and conditions under which our services were provided. Furthermore, any use of this report by a parly for purposes beyond those intended by MACTEC and Chugach Management Services, Inc. will be at the sole risk of that party.

APPENDIX A

ASBESTOS

Sample Locations Laboratory AnalYsis

?5,?8

3?- I

34,35 ??

EXISTING

RESTROOM

19,?0

NEW

RESTROOM

?,5

LEGEND:

+ / ASBESTOS SAMPLE LOCATIONS Prepored/Dote: JT 03/18/0s Checked,/Dote: cT zlg lo

NOT TO SCALE

SAMPLE LOCAÏION

Project 6520-09-01 52.01

MAP

Figure IruMACTEC

MAC DILL AFB

HANGER 2 RESTROOMS - NESHAP

TAMPA, FLORIDA

45,46,47 ,48 ?6,37 43

NOT TO SCALE

9,15 -_.

4I 40

NEW

RESTROOM

30,39

EXISTING

RESTROOM

LEGEND:

? ASBESTOS SAMPLE LOCATTONS Prepored/Dole: JT

Checked,/0ote: CT.

I

MAC DILL AFB

HANGER 2 RESTROOMS - NESHAP

TAMPA, FLORIDA ruMACTEC

SAMPLE LOCATION MAP

Project 6520-09-0152.01 Figure

PLM REPORT SUMMARY

NVLAP Lab No. 200569-0

TDH License No. 30-0287

Client:

Project:

Project No:

Identification:

Test Method:

Page I of 5

MACTEC Engineering & Consulting, lnc.

Hangar 2 RR NESHAP

6520-09-0152.01

Asbestos, Bulk Sample AnalYsis

Polarized Light Microscopy/Dispersion Staining (PLM/DS)

EPA Method 600/R-93/1 16

Lab Job No.: PLM-02702

ReportDate: 311712009

Sample Date: 3/13/2009 on3/14/2009,forry-eight (4g) bulk sanrples were submitted by Mr. Pete MacKay of MACTEC Engineering & Consulting, Inc. fbr asbestos analysis by PLM/DS.

Copies of the ìab dat¿r sheets are attached; additional intbfmation rnay be found the¡ein The results are summarized below:

Lab Sanrple No.

Client Field I.D.

S ample Description/Location Asbestos Content cLt28760 cLt2876l cLr28762 cLt28763 cL128764 cLt28765 cLt28766 cLt28767 cLr28768 cLr28769 cLt28770 cLt287'7 t cLt28772 t0 ll t2 l3

2" Ceramic Floor Tile (beige

Restroom #1

2" Celamic Flool Tile (beige

Restroom #l

Not Used

4" Ceramic Wall Tile (beige) specks) - lst Floor, Existing specks) - 1st Floor, Existing w/brown w/brown lst

#4

4" Ceramic Wall Tile (beige) - 1st

Floor, Existing Restroom #1

Floor, Existing Restroom #1

Not Used

2'X2' CelliugTile (wormhole) - lst Floor, Existing Restroom #1

2' X 2' Celling Tile (wormhole) - I st Floor, Existing Restroom #1

2'X2' CethngTile (wormhole) - 2nd Flool, New Bath #3

Drywall & Joint Compound (smooth texture) - lst Floo¡, Existing Restroom #l

Dlywall & Joint Compound (smooth texture) - 2nd Floor, Existing Bath

Dlywall & Joint Compound (smooth texture) 2nd Floor, Existing Bath #4

HVAC Duct Mastic & Insulation (white) l st Floor, Existing Restroom #l

None Detected - Ceramic Tile None Detected - Grout None Detected - White Mastic

None Detected - Ceramic Tile None Detected - Grout None Detected - White Mastic

Not Used

None Detected None Detected

None Detected None Detected

Not Used

None Detected

None Detected

None Detected

None Detected None Detected None Detected None Detected

None Detected None Detected None Detected

None Detected None Detected None Detected

Ceramic Tile Grout

Ceramic Tile Grout

Joint Tape

Joint Compound Paper Wallboard Material

Joint Compound Paper Wallboard Material

Joint Compound Paper Wallboard Material

None Detected - White Mastic None Detected - Wrap None Detected - Insulation

These samples were analyzed by layers. The ovelall perceut asbestos t'or the sample is reported when relevant. The EPA considers a matelial to be asbestos containing only if it còntains greatei than óne percent asbestos by Calibrated Visual Area Estimation (CVAE). EPA regulations ed Asbestos Containing

Maierials (RACMI- materials that are fiiable o. roy b""onre friable - be furthe| analyzed by point counting when th ten percent asbestos by

CVAE. Cateslab utiìizes CVAE on a routine basis and does not include point counting unless specifically requested may not be reproduced except in fill.

LT

NVLAP Lab No. 200569-0

TDH License No. 30-0287

Client:

Project:

Project No:

Identification:

Test Method:

MACTEC Engineering & Consulting, lnc.

Hangar 2 RR NESHAP

6520-09-0152.01

Asbestos, Bulk Sample Analysis

Polarized Light Microscopy/Dispersíon Staining (PLM/DS)

EPA Method 600/R-93/1 16

Lab Job No.: PLM-02702

Report Date: 3/1712009

Sample Date: 3/13/2009

Ott3/I4l20O9,forry-eighr (48) bulk samples were submitted by Mr. Pete MacKay of MACTEC Engineering & Consulting, hc. fo¡ asbestos analysis by PLM/DS

Copies of tbe lab data sheets are attached; additional infbrmation may be fbund therein. The resuìts are summar.ized below:

Lab Sample No.

Client Field I.D.

S ample Description/Location Asbestos Content cLt281'73 cL128774 cLr287'75 cLt28'776 cLt28777 cLt287'78 cLt28779 cLr28780 cLl2878l cLt28782 cLr28783 cL128784 cL128785 cLt28786 cLt28787 l5 l6 t7 l8 t9

2't t4 HVAC Duct Mastic & Insulation (white) - 1st Floor, Existing Restroom #2

Floor, New Restroom #3HVAC Duct Mastic & Insulation (white) - 2nd

HVAC Duct Mastic (gray) - lst Floor, Existing Restroom #l

Not Used

Not Used

Sink Caulk (white) - lst Floor, Existing Restroom #l

Sink Caulk (white) - lst Floor, Existing Restroom #1

Not Used

12" Vinyl Floor Tile (gray w/dark gray streaks) - lst Floor, New Restroom

#2

12" Vinyl Floor Tile (gray w/dark gray streaks) - 1st Floor', New Restroom

#2

Not Used

4" Vinyl Cove Base (gray) - I st Floor, New Restloom #2

4" Vinyl Cove Base (gray) - 2nd Floor, New Restroom #3

4" Vinyl Cove Base (gray) - lst Floor, New Restroom #2

Drywall & Joint Compound (rough texture) - lst Floo¡, New Restroom #2

None Detected None Detected None Detected

None Detected None Detected None Detected

None Detected

Not Used

Not Used

None Detected

None Detected

Not Used

None Detected None Detected

None Detected None Detected

Not Used

None Detected

None Detected

None Detected

White Mastic 'Wlap

Insulation

White Mastic Wrap Insulation

Floor Tile Yellow Mastic

Floor Tile Yellow Mastic

None Detected - Paint Texture None Detected - Joint Tape

None Detected - Joint Compound None Detected - Paper None Detected - Wallboard Material

These sarnples were analyzed by layers The overall percent asbestos f'or the sampìe is reported when relevant. The EPA considers a material to be asbestos containing only ifit cãntains greater than one percelt asbestos by Calibrated Visual Area Est.imation (CVAE). EPA regulations also indicate thatRegulated Asbestos Containrng

Maieriats (RACM)- matedals that are friable or may become friable - be further analyzed by point counting when the results indicate less than ten percent asbestos by

CVAE,. Cateslab utilizes CVAE on a routine basis and does not include point counting unless specifically requested by the client. The resuìts may not be reproduced except in fuìì.

L-r

Gqteg I'eþ-er.eleries ".. --.

613 S. Bois D'Arc Forney, Texas 75 126 (972) 564-4'723

PLM REPORT SUMMARY

NVLAP Lab No. 200569-0

TDH License No. 30-0287

Lab Job No.: PLM-02702

Report Da¡e: 311712009

Sample Date: 3/13/2009

Client:

Project:

Project No:

Identification:

Test Method:

MACTEC Engineering & Consulting, lnc.

Hangar 2 RR NESHAP

6520-09-0152.01

Asbestos, Bulk Sample Analysis

Polarized Light Microscopy/Dispersion Staining (PLM/DS)

EPA Method 600/R-93/1 16 Page 3 of 5

On3ll4l2})9,1brry-eight (48) bulk samples weresubnitted by Mr. PeteMacKay of MACTEC Er.rgineerilrg & Consulting, Inc. forasbestos analysis by PLM/DS.

Copres oT the lab clata iheets are attached; additioüal infbnnation rnay be found therein. The results are summarized below:

Lab Sample No.

Client Field I.D.

Sample Description/Location Asbestos Content cLr28790 cLt2879l cLt28792 cL128793 cLr28794 cLt28795 cLt28796 cL12879'7 cLl28798 cLt28799 cL128800 cL128788 cLt28'189

3l

JJ

-tt

4l

1st Floor, New Restroom #2 lst Floor, New Restloom #2

Drywall & Joint Compound (rough texture) - I st Floor, New Restroom #2

Dlywall & Joint Compound (rough texture) - 2nd Floor, New Restroom #3

2'X2'Ce1ling Tile (smooth texture) -

2' X 2' Cerl\ng Tile (smooth texture) -

Not Used

2" Pipe Insulation & Foil Wrap (white) - lst Floor, New Restloom #2

2" Ptpe Insulation & Foil Wrap (white) - lst Floor, New Restroom #2

Not Used

Carpet (green) - 2nd Floor, New Restroom #3

Carpet (green) - 2nd Floor, New Restroom #3

Carpet (green) - 2nd Floor, New Restroom #3

2" Ceramic Floor Tile (brown) - 2nd Floor, Existing Restroom #4

2" Cenmic Floor Tile (brown) - 2nd Floor', Existing Restroom #4

None Detected - Paint Texture None Detected - Joint Tape

None Detected - Joint Compound None Detected - Paper

None Detected - Wallboard Material

None Detected - Paint Texture None Detected - Joint Tape

None Detected - Joint Compound None Detected - Paper

None Detected - Wallboard Material

None Detected

None Detected

Not Used

None Detected 57o Chrysotile

None Detected 5% Chrysotile

Not Used

None Detected None Detected

None Detected None Detected

None Detected None Detected

None Detected None Detected

Cotton Wrap Insulation

Cotton Wrap Insulation

Carpet Yellow Mastic

Carpet Yellow Mastic

Celamic Tile G¡out

Ceramic Tile Grout

None Detected - Carpet None Detected - Yellow Mastic

These samples were analyzed by layers. The overall percelìt asbestos fbr the sample is reported when relevant. The EPA considers a material to be asbestos containing only i¡ ic còntains greatei than óne percent asbestos by Catibrated Visual Area Estimation (CVAE). EPA regulatioos Asbestos Containing

Maierials (RACMI- materials that ìr'e fiiable o, -uy b".or" friable - be firther analyzed by point counting when th n percant asbestos by

CVAE. Cateslab utilizes CVAE, on a routine basis and does not include point countiltg unìess specifically requested ay not be reproduced except in lull.

ú

'þ Cates Laboratories

\.\Z_ 6t3 S. Bois D'Alc

--L Forn"y. Texas 75126 (972) 564-4723

NVLAP Lab No. 200569-0

TDH License No. 30-0287

Client:

Project:

Project No:

Identification:

Test Method:

MACTEC Engineering & Consulting, lnc.

Hangar 2 RR NESHAP

6520-09-0152.01

Asbestos, Bulk Sample Analysis

Polarized Light Microscopy/Dispersion Staining (PLM/DS)

EPA Method 600/R-93/1 16

Lab Job No.:

Repoft Date:

Sarnple Date:

PL\'A-02702

311712009

3/1 3/2009

Or jl14/2009,lbrty-eigbt (48) bulk samples were submitted by Mr Pete MacKay ol MACTEC Engineering & Consulting, Inc. for asbestos analysis by PLM/DS.

Copies of the lab data sbeets are attached; additional int'ormation may be lound therein. The results are summarized below:

Lab Sample No.

Client Field I.D.

Sample Description/Location Asbestos Content cLl 2880 l cLt28802 cLr28803 cL128804 cL128805 cL128806 cL128807

Not Used

4" Ceramic Wall Tile (lt.

4" Ceramic Wall Tile (lt.

Sink Caulk (white) - 2nd

Sink Caulk (white) - 2nd

Plumbing Caulk (white)

Plurnbing Caulk (white) brown) 2nd Floor, Existing Restroom #4 brown) - 2nd Floor', Existing Restroom #4

Floor, Existing BaTh #4

Floor, Existing Bath #4

- 2nd Floor', Existing Bath #4

- 2nd Floor, Existing Bath #4

Not Used

None Detected None Detected

None Detected None Detected

None Detected

None Detected

None Detected

None Detected

Ceramic Tile Yellow Mastic

Ceramic Tile Yellow Mastic

These sampìes were analyzed by layer-s. The oveluìl percent asbestos f'or the sample is reported when relevant. The EPA considers a material to be asbestos containing only if it càntains greatei than åne percent asbestos by Calibr¿Ìted Visual Area Estimation (CVAE). EPA regulations also indicate thot Regulated Asbestos Containing

Maiel.iats (RACMI- nraterials thatãre friabìe o.lnoy b"co-" fiiable - be further analyzed by point counting wben the results indicate less than ten percent asbestos by

CVAE. Cateslab utilìzes CVAE on a routine basis and does not include point counting unless specifically requested by the client. Tbe lesuìts may not be reproduced except in lull.

CT

Gates Laboratories

613 S Bois D'Arc Folney, Texas 75126 (972) 564-4723

NVLAP Lab No. 200569-0

TDH License No. 30-0287

Client:

Project:

Project No:

Identification:

Test Method:

MACTEC Engineering & Consulting, lnc.

Hangar 2 RR NESHAP

6520-09-0152.01

Asbestos, Bulk Sample Analysis

Polarized Light Microscopy/Dispersion Staining

EPA Method 600/R-93/1 16

Lab Job No.: PLM-02702

Report Date: 311712009

Sample Date: 3/13/2009

(PLM/DS)

Page 5 of5

OÍt 311412009, fbrty-eight (48) bulk samples we|e submitted by Mr. Pete MacKay of MACTEC Engineering & Consulting, I¡c. for asbestos analysis by PLM/DS.

Copies of the lab data sheets are ¿lttached; additional inf'ormation may be tbund ther:ein.

STATEMENT OF LABORATORY ACCREDITATION

The samples were analyzed in general accordance with the procedures outlined in the Method for the

Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials, EPA/600iR-93lll6 or the U.S. Environmental

Protection Agency method, under AHERA, for the analysis of asbestos in building materials by polarized light microscopy. The results of each bulk sample relate only to the material tested and the results shall not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government.

Specific questions concerning bulk sample results shall be directed to the Laboratory Director.

Analyst: Kathy Schosek

Laboratory Director: John R. Cates, P.G, Approved Signatory:

CT

STATE OF FLORIÐA

DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS A}TD PROFESSIONAÍ, REGULÀTION

.Ð,SBESTOS LICENSING UNïT (850) 487- l-395 ]"940 NORTH MONROE STREETiÁr,r,eH¡ssnn Fl, 32399 - 0783

I4ÀCTEC ENGINEERING

BRIAN DUCHENE

].].05 SAIqCTUARY PKWY

ALPHARETTÀ

A¡ID CONSULTING, INC.

sTE 300

GA 30004

STATE OF FLORIOA AC# 3 t{ 311, T h DEPARÍMEÌilI Or. BUSTNESS ÀrÍD

PROFES SIONÀL REGUT,ÀTION

zÀ0000L1.6 t9/20/A7 û701s3760

ASBESTOS BUSINESS ORGANIZAT]ON

}Tå.CTEC ENGTNEERING À}TD CONSUT.TING

BRIA¡I DI]CHENE

IS LICENSED

ErI'1rùÈ10û.daÈd !

undgE th€ plow.toiono o€ ch.469 Fs.

NOv 30, 2009 Lo7oe2oo337o

DETACH HERE

AC# 34311_96 srArEoFFL0R|DA DEP.àRTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PRO!'ESSTONÀI, .REGITI,ÀTTON .

ÃsBEsrõs llceñsiñc t¡¡rrt 'i., : sEQ#lozoe2oo33?o

T,ICENSE IfBRBATCH NUMBER

0 011607 01_53 7 6oe /2a /2007 Ttre ÀSBESfOS BITSINESS ORGÀì{IZÀTION Na¡red below IS ITfCENSEÐ Under the provieíone of Chapter 469 FS.

Expiration date: NOV 30, 2009 t"fÀcÎEc ENGTNEERTNG Ar{D CONSULTTNG, llÍC.

BRIAN DUCHENE

4150 N 'JOHN YOI]NG PKWY

ORLAI{DO FL 32804

CTTå,RLTE CRTST

GOVERNOR

IIOLIJY BENSON

SECRETÀRY

DISPLAY AS REOUIRED BY LAW

Ac# 41fi 4,944 STATE OF FLORIDA

DEPARTME!üI OF BUSINESS ÀTED PBQEESSTqTÛ.At REGULÀTION ASBESTOS LTCENSTI{G IINÏT sEQ#r,0812 o2o22ss

DATE BATCHNUMBER

8A0000016L2/02/2008 098LL7001

the ^ASBESTOS CONSUI'TANII Na¡red below IS LICENSED Under the proviel,ons of Ercpírabíon datel NOV 30' gTAUFFER, RIÍSSELL g

1898 SETON CT

CLEARWATER

ENGINEER

Chapter 469 FS.

FL 33763-4434

EEARLIE ERTST

GO\TERNOR

CIÍ.äRLES ?IÍ. DRAGO

SËCRETARY

DISPLAY AS REQUIRËD BY LAW

APPENDIX B

LEAI)

Lead-Based Paint Testing Results

Hangar 2 Restrooms, MacDill Air Force Base, Tompa, Floritla

MACTEC Project 6520-09 0l 52.01 mg/cm2:riìligranls per square centinreter ppm=parts per milìion

P:\FACILII\2009\Projects\6520-09-01 52 Mac Díll Hangar 2 RR NESHAP\Reporr\LPB Table.xls

Lead-Based Paint Testing Results Hangar 2 Restrooms

MACTEC Project 6520-09-0152

March 24, 2009

Report of Limited NESHAP Asbestos ancl LBP Testtrtg

Sample Nn Specilìc Location Component Substrate Color Comments/Condition

Test Reading lmqlcm2l

Extrapolated Result (ppm)

6 Calibration 1 .12 +l- 0 0l 1.10 l Calibration 1 .12 +l- 0.01 100

8 Ca bration \ \2+l-0.07 110 ls1 Floor, Existing Bathroom #l

9 West Waìl Doo Metal Grav 0.00 BDL

0 West Wall Door Jamb Metal Grav 010 s00

West Wall Wall Ceramic Tile Beise 0.00 BDL

2 West Wall Wall Drvwall White 000 BDL

South Wall Wall Ceramic Tile Beise 0.00 BDt 4 South Wall Wall Drvwall White 0.00 BDL

5 South Vr'all Partition Wall Formica White 000 BDL

6 East Wall Wall Drwvall White 0.00 BDL '7 East Wall Wall Ceramic Tile Beige 000 BDL

8 North Wall Wall Dwwall White 000 BDL

9 North Wall Wall Ceramic Tile Reìoe 000 BDL

20 Floor Floor Concrete Reioer 0.00 BDL st Floor. New Bathroom #2

2l West Wall Door Metal Lt. Grav 001 50

22 West Wall Door Jamb Metal Lt. Grav 0.01 50

23 West Wall Wall l-lruall White 0 11 550

24 West Wall Baseboard Vinvl Blue/Gray 0.10 500

25 South Wall Wa'll Drvwall White 0.00 BDL

26 South Wall Door Metal Grav 0.00 BDL

27 South Wall Door Jaml: Metal Grav 001 50

28 South Wall Closet DooI Metal Gray 0.05 250

29 South Vy'all Closet Door Jamb Metal Grav 001 50

30 South Wall Closet \üall Drywall Grav 0.00 BDL

31 East Wall Wall Dn.ryvall White 0.00 BDL

32 East Wall Baseboard Vinvl Blue/Grav -0.30 BDL

JJ North Wall Wall Drwvall White 0.00 BDL

34 North Wall Baseboard Vinvl Blue/Grav 0.10 500

35 South \ilall Wall Above Droo Ceilins Concrete Tan 4.50 22.500

36 South\ilall leilins Above Drop Ceilinr Concrete Tan 4.80 24.000 lst Floor, Existing Bathroom #1

37 North Wall Wall Above Droo Ceilins Concrete Tan 7.30 36.500

38 North \üall leilins Above Droo Ceilinr Concrete Tan 7.00 3s,000

39 North Wall Duct Sealant Metal Gray 000 BDL

BDL:below detection 1ìmil Checked vy, CI mg/cnrlmilligrams per square centintete¡ ppm:parts per nriìlion

P:\FACILIT\2009\Projects\6520-09-01 52 Mac DiIl Hangar 2 RR NESHAP\Report\LPB Table xls

Lead-Based Paint Test¡ng Results

Hangar 2 Restrooms MACTEC Project 6520-09-0152

Sample No.

Specific Location Component Substrate Color Comments/Condition Test Reading lmolcm2ì Extrapolated Result (ppm) rd Floor. New Batluoom #3

40 West Wall Door Metal Gray 0.01 50

4l West Wall Door Jamb Metal Grav 0.00 BDL

42 West Wall Wall Drwall Lt. Blue -0 20 BDL

43 West Wall Baseboard Vinvl Blue/Gray -0.50 BDL

44 North Wall Wall Drwva I Lt Blue 000 BDL

45 South Wall WalI Drwvall Lt. Blue 000 BDL

46 East Wall Wall l)rwall Lt Blue 0.00 BDL

47 East Wall Baseboard Vinyl Blue/Grav -0 60 BDL

48 East Wall Wìndow Ledse Wood l.t Blue 000 BDL

49 F,ast Wall Window Frame Metaì Black 000 BDL

50 East \ilall Wall Above Drop Ceilins Concrete Tan 7;70 38,500

51 East Wall Ceilins Above Drop Ceiliu Concrete Tan 7.70 38,500

2nd Floor. Existing Bathroom #4

52 \ryest Wall rùy'all Ceramic Tile Lt. Brown 10.00 50,000

<1 West Walì Wall Drwvall I-t. Blue 001 50

54 West Wall Door Metal Lt. Blue 0.00 BDL

55 West Wall Door Jamb Metaì Lt. Blue 0. l0 500

5t) South \üall \ilall Ceramic Tile Lt, Brown 10.00 s0.000

57 South Wall Wall Drwvall Lt Blue 0.0 r 50

58 Floor Floor Ceramic Tile Brown 0.01 50

59 North Wall Partition Vy'all Formica Tan 0.00 BDL

60 North Wall Wall Ceramic Tile Lt. Brown 12.00 60.000

61 North Wall Wall Drvwall Lt. Blue 0.00 BDL

62 North Wall Sink Cabinet Pressboard Tan 0.00 BDL

63 East Wall Window Frame Metal Black 0.00 BDL

64 South \üall Wall Above Droo Ceilins Concrete Tan 7.30 36,500

65 Closet Wall Drvwall Tan 000 BDL

66 Closet Door Metaì Blue 000 BDL b/ Closet Doo¡ Frame Metal Blue 000 BDL

68 Calibration I \2 +l- 0 0'7 1.10

69 Calibration t.l2 +l- 0.07 1. r0

70 Calil¡ration I t2+l-0.01 1.00

BDL=below detection limit Checked lr1, 6 lfrnitph Stutpx ffnutrnnnrentut lf,rutprtttm ågensg

6Í¡ix ix tu cntitU tltst

Xntlrrtilunrùirftun uf:

" ..1r, , , ,.,. '.',.' t, Florida

Thís certífication is valid from the date of issuance and expires

FL-R-9718-2

Certification # Joanne Benante, Chief

Pesticides and Toxic Substances Branch

I

LLC

C erttficøte oÍ Achievement Carol Thoma

OHC Environmental Engineering has successfully completed the Mønufacturer's Training Course þr the NITON Spectrum Analyzer and is now certified in radiation safety and monitoríng, rneesuretnent technolog¡, qnd møchine maintenance of the NITON XRF Spectrum Analyzer, A404294088s rW¿h441îef/à"L

Certificate Number

05119104 Orlando, FL Training Coordiuntor

{í*.,.-¿¿:- Ê

Director of Trainlng