CONTRACTOR PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE.docx
DOCX document 16 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Beale AFB MACC Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA4686-11-R-0012
About this file
Past performance questionnaire
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 27
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
The following questionaire shall be forwarded to all references provided
Request you provide the following information on the contractor’s present and/or past performance by placing an X in the space provided by the most appropriate response. If you wish to elaborate on your answer, please provide comments on the lines provided after each question. If more space is needed, continue your comments on a separate sheet of paper and attach it to this questionnaire prior to submission to the 9th Contracting Squadron. You are asked to provide frank, concise comments regarding your overall assessment of the contractor’s performance on the contract identified. You are urged to supplement your own knowledge of the contractor’s performance with the judgment of others in your organization. The following definitions are applicable rating levels of the contractor’s performance on the identified contract. If no performance record is identifiable for a particular question, place an X below “N/A” (Not Applicable).
Performance Confidence Assessment:
Exceptional Confidence Based on the contractor’s performance, no doubt exists that you would hire them again for additional, similar work or that they would complete the work to your satisfaction in a timely manner.
Very Good Confidence Based on the contractor’s performance, minimal doubt exists that you would hire them again for additional, similar work or that they would compete the work to your satisfaction in a timely manner.
Satisfactory Confidence Based on the contractor’s performance, some doubt exists that you would hire them again for additional, similar work or that they would complete the work to your satisfaction in a timely manner.
Marginal Confidence Based on the contractor’s performance, substantial doubt exists that you would hire them again for additional, similar work or that they would complete the work to your satisfaction in a timely manner.
Unsatisfactory Confidence Based on the contractor’s performance, extreme doubt exists that you would hire them again for additional, similar work or that they would complete the work to your satisfaction in a timely manner.
CONTRACTOR PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE
SECTION A - RESPONDENT IDENTIFICATION
Please provide information for the primary individuals completing this survey.
Name: ___________________________________________________________
Office Identifier: ___________________________________________________
Telephone Number: _________________________________________________
Mailing Address: ___________________________________________________
E-Mail Address: ____________________________________________________
Relation to Contract: ________________________________________________
Name: ___________________________________________________________
Office Identifier: ___________________________________________________
Telephone Number: _________________________________________________
Mailing Address: ___________________________________________________
Name: ____________________________________________________________
Office Identifier: ___________________________________________________
Telephone Number: _________________________________________________
Mailing Address: ___________________________________________________
CONTRACTOR PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE
SECTION B
PLEASE COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION ON
THE CONTRACT YOU ARE INVOLVED WITH:
Contractor’s Name / Company Name: _______________________________________
Contractor’s Involvement: __ Prime Contractor __ Sub-Contractor
Contract Number: __________________________
Project Title: ___________________________________________________________
Project Description: _____________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Period of Performance: __________________________________
Contract Amount: $__________________ or Range:\
__ $100,000 to $500,000
__ $500,000 to $1,000,000
__ $1,000,001 to $10,000,000
Contract Type:
__ Firm Fixed Price
__ Cost Reimbursement
__ Other (Specify) __________________________________________
Date Contract Awarded: _______________________
Contract Status: Still Active
__ Yes (If Yes, Contract Completion Date Including Extensions :_____________)
__ No (If No, Projected or Scheduled Date Project Completed :______________)
MANAGEMENT
Rate the contractor on his / her ability to provide adequate management, manning, and equipment to complete the work.
| Exceptional | Very Good | Satisfactory | Marginal | Unsatisfactory | N/A | ||
| ( ) | ( ) | ( ) | ( ) | ( ) | ( ) |
Comments: ______________________________________________________________________
Rate the contractor’s ability to respond to contingencies, emergencies, weather, and other environmental delays without falling behind the regular schedule.
| Exceptional | Very Good | Satisfactory | Marginal | Unsatisfactory | N/A | ||
| ( ) | ( ) | ( ) | ( ) | ( ) | ( ) |
Comments: ______________________________________________________________________
QUALITY CONTROL AND MATERIAL WORKMANSHIP
Rate the contractor on his / her ability to provide effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet accepted standards of good workmanship
| Exceptional | Very Good | Satisfactory | Marginal | Unsatisfactory | N/A | ||
| ( ) | ( ) | ( ) | ( ) | ( ) | ( ) |
Comments: ______________________________________________________________________
Rate the contractor on his / her ability to take appropriate action to correct deficiencies, in a timely manner, when identified.
| Exceptional | Very Good | Satisfactory | Marginal | Unsatisfactory | N/A | ||
| ( ) | ( ) | ( ) | ( ) | ( ) | ( ) |
Comments: ______________________________________________________________________
KNOWLEDGE AND PROFESSIONALISM
Rate the contractor on his / her knowledge and professionalism as applied to the subject contract.
| Exceptional | Very Good | Satisfactory | Marginal | Unsatisfactory | N/A | ||
| ( ) | ( ) | ( ) | ( ) | ( ) | ( ) |
Comments: ______________________________________________________________________
PROBLEM RESOLUTION
Rate the contractor’s ability to proactively recognize and resolve unanticipated difficulties. (Did the contractor display initiative to solve problems? Did the contractor identify risks/problems as they occur?)
| Exceptional | Very Good | Satisfactory | Marginal | Unsatisfactory | N/A | ||
| ( ) | ( ) | ( ) | ( ) | ( ) | ( ) |
Comments: ______________________________________________________________________
ADHERENCE TO SCHEDULES
Rate the contractor on his / her ability to complete the work within the time frame allocated.
| Exceptional | Very Good | Satisfactory | Marginal | Unsatisfactory | N/A | ||
| ( ) | ( ) | ( ) | ( ) | ( ) | ( ) |
Comments: ______________________________________________________________________
WORKING RELATIONSHIP
Rate the working relationship between the contractor and yourself or your organization.
| Exceptional | Very Good | Satisfactory | Marginal | Unsatisfactory | N/A | |||
| ( ) | ( ) | ( ) | ( ) | ( ) | ( ) |
Comments: ______________________________________________________________________
DESIGN CAPABILITIES
If the contractor provided complete or partial design services, rate his / her ability to address your needs and concerns in the design.
| Exceptional | Very Good | Satisfactory | Marginal | Unsatisfactory | N/A | ||
| ( ) | ( ) | ( ) | ( ) | ( ) | ( ) |
Comments: ______________________________________________________________________
ENVIRONMENTAL AWARENESS
Rate the contractor on his / her environmental awareness including compliance and initiatives such as use of recycled products, EPA-designated products, energy-efficient products, and Biobased products.
Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory N/A ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
Comments: ______________________________________________________________________
CONTRACT PERFORMANCE
During the course of the subject contract, was the contractor ever placed on notice that his / her actions were jeopardizing the terms of the contract? (If “Yes”, please explain why.)
| Yes | No |
| ( ) | ( ) |
Comments: ______________________________________________________________________
During the course of the subject contract, were payments to the contractor ever withheld due to the contractor’s failure to perform in a satisfactory manner? (If “Yes”, please explain why.)
| Yes | No |
| ( ) | ( ) |
Comments:
SUMMARY:
Would you hire this contractor again?
Yes No
Comments:
Would you recommend this contractor to others?
Yes No
Comments:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .