Amendment 4.doc
DOC document 116 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Beale AFB MACC Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA4686-11-R-0012
About this file
Amendment 0004
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 27
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE
SUMMARY OF CHANGES
SECTION H - SPECIAL CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS
The following have been modified:
SECTION H
SECTION H
SPECIAL CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS
H-1 PREPARATION OF PROGRESS SCHEDULES AND REPORTS
The reports contemplated by the clause titled “Schedules for Construction Contracts” shall be accomplished on and in accordance with instructions pertaining to AF Form 3064, Contract Progress Schedule, and AF Form 3065, Contract Progress Report. The AF Form 3064 shall be provided to the Contracting Office not later than 15 calendar days after issuance of the Notice to Proceed.
H-2
MATERIAL APPROVAL SUBMITTAL FORM (AF FORM 3000)
The contractor AF Form 3000, as contemplated by the Materials and Workmanship Clause, shall submit all material and articles requiring approval. (See attached AF Form 66, Schedule of Materials Submittals). In addition the contractor is reminded that an individual within the company who has the authority to make the certification must sign the certification on the AF Form 3000.
H-3 REQUIRED INSURANCE
Per FAR clause 52.228-5 (Jan 1997) entitled, “Insurance – Work on a Government Installation”, the Contractor shall, at its own expense, procure and thereafter maintain the following kinds of insurance with respect to performance under the contract.
a. Workmen’s Compensation and Employers Liability Insurance as required by law except that if this contract is to be performed in a State which does not require or permit private insurance, then compliance with the statutory or administrative requirements in any such State will be satisfactory. The required Workmen’s Compensation insurance shall extend to cover employer’s liability for accidental bodily injury or death and for occupational disease with a minimum liability of $100,000.
b. General Liability Insurance. Bodily injury liability insurance, in the minimum limits of $500,000 per occurrence shall be required on the comprehensive form of policy.
c. Automobile Liability Insurance. This insurance shall be required on the comprehensive form of policy and shall provide bodily injury liability and property damage liability covering the operation of all automobiles used in connection with the performance of the contract. At least the minimum limits of $200,000 per person and $500,000 per occurrence for bodily injury and $20,000 per occurrence for property damage shall be required.
d. The Certificate of Insurance shall provide for thirty (30) days written notice to the Contracting Officer by the insurance company prior to cancellation or material change in policy coverage. Other requirements and information are contained in the aforementioned “Insurance” clause.
H-4 TELEGRAPHIC AND TELEFAX BIDS/AMENDMENTS
Telegraphic and telefax offers are not acceptable. Offerors may telefax changes to their offers to (919)-722-5424. The change must arrive at the place specified in the solicitation prior to the time set for receipt of offers. Changes received after this time will not be considered.
H-5 ON-SITE OFFICE TRAILERS AND STORAGE TRAILERS/FACILITIES
a. The Contracting Officer will designate the exact location for the contractor’s storage area. Upon Contracting Officer’s approval, buildings and structures, which are part of the contract, may be used for storage providing the space is not required for the occupancy and the contractor accepts full responsibility for storage therein.
b. Once an exact location has been determined, the contractor can use all approved and available services (i.e., electricity, water, and sewage) at the storage area. The Contracting Officer will inform the contractor whether or not the Government shall be reimbursed (and at what rate structure) for any or all such services.
H-6
BONDS
Performance and Payment Bonds/Alternative Payment Protection. Per FAR Clause 52.228-15 entitled, “Performance and Payment Bonds – Construction (Jul 2000),” the contractor shall be required to furnish a Performance Bonds (Standard Form 25) and a Payment Bond (Standard Form 25-A), each with good and sufficient surety and sureties, acceptable to the Government within 14 calendar days after award. Payment protection shall be required for task orders between $2,000 and $150,000.
*NOTE: A Notice to Proceed will not be issued and no work shall begin until good and sufficient surety has been received and accepted by the Contracting Officer.
H-7 ALTERNATE PAYMENT PROTECTION
For task orders between $2,000 and $150,000, the Contractor shall provide one of the following alternative payment protections (IAW FAR 52.228-13):
(1) Payment Bond
(2) Irrevocable Letter of Credit (ILC)
H-8 UTILITY SERVICES
The Contracting Officer has determined that Government-operated utilities are adequate and will be furnished to the contractor without charge where existing outlets are available. The contractor is responsible for installing temporary service outlets, as necessary, and charges will be made in accordance with the clause entitled “Availability and Use of Utility Services” (Contract Clause 52.236-14). The following utilities will be available: Electricity, Sewer, and Water.
H-9 ESTIMATED QUANTITIES
There may be estimated quantity line items for this project. For those estimated quantity line items, the contractor shall maintain a daily usage log and delivery/disposal tickets, if applicable. The contractor shall ensure that the superintendent/project manager and the government inspector sign the log. Copies of the signed log and applicable tickets must be provided to the Contracting Officer with each invoice for estimated quantities.
H-10 On-Line Representations and Certifications Application (ORCA) (Annual Representations and Certifications)
a. All offerors in response to this solicitation shall complete electronic annual representations and certifications at http://www.bpn.gov/orca in conjunction with required registration in the Central Contractor Registration (CCR) database. (See Section K for additional applicable solicitation-specific representations and certifications).
b. Prospective contractors shall update the representations and certifications submitted to ORCA as necessary, but at least annually, to ensure they are kept current, accurate, and complete. The representations and certifications are effective until one year from date of submission or update to ORCA.
H-11 TASK ORDER PERFORMANCE PERIOD
Performance periods will be negotiated for each individual task order.
H-12 PREAWARD SITE INSPECTIONS
Contractors shall inspect project job sites with Government representatives. Any deficiencies, conflicts, or other areas of concern existing in the scope of work and/or applicable drawings should be brought to the attention of the Contracting Officer, in writing. The contractor shall also notify the Contracting Officer, in writing, upon observing any features in the design that appear to be ambiguous, confusing, conflicting, or erroneous.
H-13 NOTICE OF CONSTRUCTIVE CHANGES
No order, statement or direction of the Contracting Officer, an authorized representative of the Contracting Officer whether or not acting within the limits of their authority, or any other representatives of the Government, shall constitute a change order under the “Changes” clause of the contract or entitle the contractor(s) to an equitable adjustment of the price or delivery schedule, unless a change is issued in writing and signed by the Contracting Officer.
H-14 PRE-DESIGN AND/OR PRE-CONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE
Prior to starting work under a task order, contractors shall meet with the Contracting Officer and designated technical representative to discuss and develop mutual understandings concerning schedule and performance.
H-15 TASK ORDER ISSUANCE PROCEDURES
(a) Work under this contract will be ordered by written task orders issued on DD Form 1155 (Order for Supplies or Services) to the contractor by the Contracting Officer.
(b) Task order numbers will consist of the basic contract number followed by a 4-digit supplemental task order number. The task order number must be reflected on all correspondence related to the task order.
(c) The Government will not be obligated to reimburse the contractor for work performed, items delivered, or any costs incurred, nor shall the contractor be obligated to perform, deliver, or otherwise incur costs except as authorized by duly executed task orders.
(d) Task orders will be firm fixed price and clearly define the specific services to be performed or the performance desired. Each task order may contain additional, site or project specific, provisions. Any such additional provisions shall be a part of the Request for Proposal.
(e) Task order projects may be non-complex performance-oriented tasks requiring minimal design, may be complex construction requiring design development for design-build construction, or any combination thereof. Any estimated quantities provided in project documents are considered informational only. Contractors must validate quantities and all features of work necessary to deliver a complete and functional project. The task order may or may not have traditional plans and specifications but may include sketches, and requests for catalog cuts, and other submittals. The following describes the procedures for each type of requirement the task order could present:
(1) Contractor-Provided Design/Design Build: MACC Contractors shall provide an initial ‘Concept’ design consisting of drawings, sketches, outline specifications, design analysis, and/or other documentation as required by the task order Statement of Work. MACC Contractors shall also provide a price proposal and may be required to include a proposed performance period. The Government will evaluate submitted proposals in accordance with task order requirements. Only the successful offeror will be required to proceed with subsequent design effort (i.e. 35%, 65%, 95% and/or 100% as stated in each task order) and execute construction.
(2) Government-Provided Design/Design-Build: MACC Contractors shall be provided a ‘Concept’ design, consisting of drawings, sketches, outline specifications, design analysis and/or other documentation as required by the task order Statement of Work. Based on the ‘Concept’ design, MACC Contractors shall provide a price proposal and may be required to include a proposed performance period. The Government will evaluate the submitted proposals in accordance with task order requirements. Only the successful offeror will be required to proceed with subsequent design effort (i.e. 35%, 65%, 95% and/or 100% as stated in each task order) and execute construction.
(3) Construction Only: MACC Contractors shall be provided a previously accomplished design which may be representative of a 35%, 65%, 95% or 100% design consisting of drawings, specifications, design analysis and/or other documentation as required by the task order Statement of Work. Based on this completed design, MACC Contractors shall provide a price proposal and may be required to include a proposed performance period (as stated in each task order). The Government will evaluate submitted price proposals in accordance with task order requirements. Only the successful offeror will proceed with construction. The design levels stated above are defined in the basic MACC Statement of Work.
(f) Task order solicitations will provide contractors with as much information as possible regarding the existing conditions of the site and any pre-existing structures.
(g) Contractors will provide a price proposal and a proposed performance period. The Government will evaluate submitted proposals according to criteria specified in the task order request for proposal (RFP). Only the successful offeror will be required to proceed with subsequent design effort, if required, and execute construction.
(h) Task orders may be modified by the Contracting Officer. Modifications to task orders will be issued on Standard Form (SF) 30 and cite the task order number.
(i) Submission of proposals for task orders is not required. However, contractors are required to contact the Contracting Officer within two days after receipt of task order RFP if a contractor will not participate in the walk-through or submit a proposal on a task order. Failure by Offerors to participate responsibly in Site Visits and submit proposals may result in the Government not exercising the option to extend the contract or exclusion of the contractor from further competition.
H-16 COMPETITION
(a) Only contractors awarded a contract as a result of this RFP will compete for subsequent task orders. Contractors are encouraged to participate in all site visits and submit proposals. To execute fiscal year end projects, the Government may solicit offers for projects for which funds are not certified or readily available. Submission of proposals for these acquisitions is discretionary and will have no negative impact on the contractor.
Occasionally, (generally during the last quarter of the fiscal year), the Government will solicit offers for projects for which funds are not certified or readily available. Air Combat Command refers to these acquisitions as “Advance Contracting Authority (ACA)” or “Normal Straddle Bid (NSB)” projects. Under ACA, funds are not available and may not become available. The Government makes no promise to award a contract. If funds do not become available for ACA projects, the RFP is cancelled and no award is made. Under NSB, funds may be available in the current fiscal year or the next fiscal year. If a contract is not awarded in the current fiscal year, it will be awarded in the following fiscal year (see AFFARS MP5332.7, Contract Funding). Submission of proposals for these acquisitions is at the sole discretion of the respective MACC Contractors and their declination to participate in any or all such solicitations will not reflect negatively upon them. This includes projects that are in whole or in part ACA projects.
(b) Unless the Contracting Officer applies the exceptions noted below, each task order will be awarded, as a result of competition to the contractor who offers the best value to the Government considering task order evaluation criteria.
(c) The Contracting Officer reserves the right to award a task order without competition based upon a determination that:
(1) The agency need for the supplies or services are so urgent that providing a fair opportunity would result in unacceptable delays;
(2) Only one awardee is capable of providing the supplies or services required at the level of quality required because the supplies or services being ordered are unique or highly specialized;
(3) The order must be issued on a sole-source basis in the interest of economy and efficiency as a logical follow-on to an order already issued under the contract, provided that all awardees were given a fair opportunity to be considered for the original order.
H-17 DESCRIPTION OF SUBSEQUENT TASK ORDERS
(a) Task orders projects may range from $2,000 to $15,000,000 and may require either a single discipline or multi-disciplined design services. Projects may also require comprehensive interior design, lead and asbestos abatement, and incorporation of sustainable features. Some projects may require only minimal design.
(b) Upon award the best value contractor will be awarded the seed project and all other contractors will be awarded smaller Task Order. These Task Orders will be sufficient to meet the contract minimum for each contractor. In accordance with FAR 16.505(b)(2) the government reserves the right to go direct sole source to any contractor awarded the MACC in order to satisfy a minimum guarantee. Past performance will be assessed at least annually and reviewed prior to decisions to exercise options.
(c) Technical narratives, if required, may address one or more of the following factors:
--Design
--The Contractor’s technical understanding of the work
--The most efficient and effective plan to accomplish the work.
--Rationale for proposed materials, type, and quantities
--Sustainable design features
H-18 SUBSEQUENT TASK ORDER EVALUATION CRITERIA
Subsequent task orders may be awarded on best value, either tradeoff process or low price, low price technically acceptable, or low bid price. If the Government decides to issue the task order as a best value using the tradeoff process, award factors will vary depending on the unique requirements of each task order. In addition to price or cost, one or more of the following criteria may be considered:
(a) Past Performance – task order past performance or prior past performance on other contracts
(b) Quality of Deliverables
(c) Ability to meet schedule requirements
(d) Relevant experience
(e) Cost control
(f) Potential impact on other orders placed with the contractor
(g) Current workload
(h) Design
(i) The Contractor’s technical understanding of the work
(j) The most efficient and effective plan to accomplish the work
(k) Rationale for proposed materials, type, and quantities
(l) Sustainable design features
H-19
LIQUIDATED DAMAGES
Any Task Order that is determined to need liquidated damages will be assessed on each task order.
H-20 BONDING CAPABILITIES
Offerors must have a bonding capacity of at least $10M per project and an aggregate of at least $20M to be considered for award of this contract.
SECTION L - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO BIDDERS
The following have been modified:
SECTION L
17)
SECTION L
Instructions, Conditions, and Notices to Offerors or Respondents
L-I - Solicitation Provisions Incorporated by Reference
| 52.215-1 |
| Instructions to Offerors--Competitive Acquisition |
| JAN 2004 |
| 52.215-1 Alt I |
| Instructions to Offerors--Competitive Acquisition (Jan 2004) - Alternate I |
| OCT 1997 |
| 52.215-1 Alt II |
| Instructions to Offerors--Competitive Acquisition (Jan 2004) - Alternate II |
| OCT 1997 |
| 52.216-27 |
| Single or Multiple Awards |
| OCT 1995 |
| 52.236-27 Alt I |
| Site Visit (Construction) (Feb 1995) - Alternate I |
| FEB 1995 |
| 52.247-6 |
| Financial Statement |
| APR 1984 |
| 52.252-3 |
| Alterations in Solicitation |
| APR 1984 |
L-II - Solicitation Provisions in Full Text:
CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY FULL TEXT
52.204-6 DATA UNIVERSAL NUMBERING SYSTEM (DUNS) NUMBER (APR 2008)
(a) The offeror shall enter, in the block with its name and address on the cover page of its offer, the annotation “DUNS” or “DUNS+4” followed by the DUNS number or “DUNS+4” that identifies the offeror's name and address exactly as stated in the offer. The DUNS number is a nine-digit number assigned by Dun and Bradstreet, Inc. The DUNS+4 is the DUNS number plus a 4-character suffix that may be assigned at the discretion of the offeror to establish additional CCR records for identifying alternative Electronic Funds Transfer (EFT) accounts (see Subpart 32.11) for the same concern.
(b) If the offeror does not have a DUNS number, it should contact Dun and Bradstreet directly to obtain one.
(1) An offeror may obtain a DUNS number--
(i) Via the Internet at http://fedgov.dnb.com/webform or if the offeror does not have internet access, it may call Dun and Bradstreet at 1-866-705-5711 if located within the United States; or
(ii) If located outside the United States, by contacting the local Dun and Bradstreet office. The offeror should indicate that it is an offeror for a U.S. Government contract when contacting the local Dun and Bradstreet office.
(2) The offeror should be prepared to provide the following information:
(i) Company legal business name.
(ii) Tradestyle, doing business, or other name by which your entity is commonly recognized.
(iii) Company physical street address, city, state and Zip Code.
(iv) Company mailing address, city, state and Zip Code (if separate from physical).
(v) Company telephone number.
(vi) Date the company was started.
(vii) Number of employees at your location.
(viii) Chief executive officer/key manager.
(ix) Line of business (industry).
(x) Company Headquarters name and address (reporting relationship within your entity).
(End of provision)
52.216-1 TYPE OF CONTRACT (APR 1984)
The Government contemplates award of a minimum of three (3) and maximum of five (5) Firm Fixed-Price Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contracts resulting from this solicitation.
(End of provision)
52.222-5 DAVIS-BACON ACT--SECONDARY SITE OF THE WORK (JUL 2005)
(a)(1) The offeror shall notify the Government if the offeror intends to perform work at any secondary site of the work, as defined in paragraph (a)(1)(ii) of the FAR clause at 52.222-6, Davis-Bacon Act, of this solicitation.
(2) If the offeror is unsure if a planned work site satisfies the criteria for a secondary site of the work, the offeror shall request a determination from the Contracting Officer.
(b)(1) If the wage determination provided by the Government for work at the primary site of the work is not applicable to the secondary site of the work, the offeror shall request a wage determination from the Contracting Officer.
(2) The due date for receipt of offers will not be extended as a result of an offeror's request for a wage determination for a secondary site of the work.
(End of provision)
52.233-2 SERVICE OF PROTEST (SEP 2006)
(a) Protests, as defined in section 33.101 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation, that are filed directly with an agency, and copies of any protests that are filed with the Government Accountability Office (GAO), shall be served on the Contracting Officer (addressed as follows) by obtaining written and dated acknowledgment of receipt from 9th Contracting Squadron, 6500 B St, Beale AFB, CA, 95903
(b) The copy of any protest shall be received in the office designated above within one day of filing a protest with the GAO.
(End of provision)
52.236-27 SITE VISIT (CONSTRUCTION) (FEB 1995)
(a) The clauses at 52.236-2, Differing Site Conditions, and 52.236-3, Site Investigations and Conditions Affecting the Work, will be included in any contract awarded as a result of this solicitation. Accordingly, offerors or quoters are urged and expected to inspect the site where the work will be performed.
(b) An organized site visit has been scheduled for:
13 July 11 at 930
(c) Participants will meet at:
9th Contracting Squadron
9 CONS Conference Room in Bldg. 2529 6500 B Street Beale AFB, CA 95903 (End of provision)
52.252-1 SOLICITATION PROVISIONS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE (FEB 1998)
This solicitation incorporates one or more solicitation provisions by reference, with the same force and effect as if they were given in full text. Upon request, the Contracting Officer will make their full text available. The offeror is cautioned that the listed provisions may include blocks that must be completed by the offeror and submitted with its quotation or offer. In lieu of submitting the full text of those provisions, the offeror may identify the provision by paragraph identifier and provide the appropriate information with its quotation or offer. Also, the full text of a solicitation provision may be accessed electronically at this/these address(es):
http://farsite.hill.af.mil (End of provision
52.252-5 AUTHORIZED DEVIATIONS IN PROVISIONS (APR 1984)
(a) The use in this solicitation of any Federal Acquisition Regulation (48 CFR Chapter 1) provision with an authorized deviation is indicated by the addition of"(DEVIATION)" after the date of the provision.
(b) The use in this solicitation of any Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation (48 CFR Chapter 2) provision with an authorized deviation is indicated by the addition of "(DEVIATION)" after the name of the regulation.
(End of provision)
5352.215-9001 NOTICE OF PRE-BID/PRE-PROPOSAL CONFERENCE (MAY 1996)
a) A pre-bid/pre-proposal conference will be conducted at the 9th Contracting Squadron, 6500 B Street, Beale AFB, CA 95903 on 13 July 11 at 0930 for the purpose of answering questions regarding this solicitation.
(b) Submit the names of all attendees (not to exceed 5) to 1Lt Andrew Gibson, 9th Contracting Squadron, 6500 B St, Beale AFB, CA 95903 prior to COB 7 July 11. This information must be provided in advance in order to ensure access to the military base/conference site and adequate seating for the conference attendees.
(c) Bidders/Offerors are requested to submit questions to the point of contact noted above not later than 11 July 11. Information provided at this conference shall not qualify the terms and conditions of the solicitation and specifications. Terms of the solicitation and specifications remain unchanged unless the solicitation is amended in writing. If an amendment is issued, normal procedures relating to the acknowledgment and receipt of solicitation amendments shall apply.
(d) A record of the conference shall be made and furnished to all prospective bidders/offerors. The record should include minutes of the meeting, including questions (on a non-attribution basis) and answers.
L-III ‑ PROPOSAL PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS
A. To assure timely and equitable evaluation of proposals, offerors must follow the instructions contained herein. Offerors are required to meet all solicitation requirements, including terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements, in addition to those identified as evaluation factors or subfactors. Failure to meet a requirement may result in an offer being ineligible for award. Offerors must clearly identify any exception to the solicitation terms and conditions and provide complete accompanying rationale. The response shall consist of three (3) separate parts; Part I - Price Proposal, Part II - Technical Proposal, and Part III - Past Performance Information.
B. The contracting officer has determined there is a high probability of adequate price competition in this acquisition. Upon examination of the initial offers, the contracting officer will review this determination and if, in the contracting officer's opinion, adequate price competition exists no additional cost information will be requested and certification under FAR 15.406-2 will not be required. However, if at any time during this competition the contracting officer determines that adequate price competition no longer exists; offerors may be required to submit information to the extent necessary for the contracting officer to determine the reasonableness and affordability of the price.
C. Specific Instructions:
1. PART I – PRICE PROPOSAL - Submit original and two (2) copies
(a) Complete blocks 14 (to include CAGE Code), 15, 16, 17, 19 (if applicable), and 20 A-C of SF 1442, Solicitation, Offer, and Award. An authorized official of the firm must sign and date the SF 1442 in Block 20 A-C. In doing so, the offeror accepts to the contract terms and conditions as written in the RFP Sections A through K. These sections constitute the model contract.
(b) Offer schedule and construction cost estimate breakdown (AF Form 3052). The seed project will be awarded with the award of the MACC.
(c) Complete the necessary fill-ins and certifications in Sections I through K. Section K shall be returned in its entirety. For Sections C through I, the offeror shall submit only those pages that require a fill-in.
(d) If applicable, provide a copy of the letter from the Small Business Administration (SBA) showing proof of Section 8(a) status.
2.
PART II – TECHNICAL PROPOSAL - Submit original plus three (3) copies.
(a) Demonstration Project – The technical proposal/seed project will be evaluated in terms of technical acceptability.
a) Design Submittal – Provide thirty-five percent design per definition in MACC statement of work.
Contractor shall submit original and three copies of drawings, design analysis, outline specifications and construction estimate.
b) Drawing – Provide graphical representations documenting the required repairs, renovations and additions required for the seed projecting accordance with the SOW in the solicitation.
c) Engineering Assumptions – provide a list of assumptions with 35% design. If none state such and explain why.
d) Specifications Required – supply an outline of the sections of specifications with the 35% proposal.
e) Confirmation of bonding capacity (minimum $10M per project, $20M aggregate) from bonding surety.
Notice to Offerors: The seed project will be awarded with the award of this contract.
3.
PART III – PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION - Only references for same or similar type contract desired. Submit original plus three (3) copies.
(a) Quality and Satisfaction Rating for Contracts Completed in the Past Three Years: Provide any information currently available (letters, metrics, customer surveys, independent surveys, etc.) which demonstrates customer satisfaction with overall job performance and quality of completed product for same or similar type contract. In addition, explain corrective actions taken in the past, if any, for substandard performance and any current performance problems such as cost overruns, extended performance periods, numerous warranty calls, etc.
For projects to be used in the evaluation of past performance, they must meet the below criteria;
1. RECENT - ongoing contracts with a performance history, and contracts completed within three (3) years from the issue date of this solicitation.
2. RELEVANT - Relevant projects include a demonstrated record of successful design/build, build, and completion of multi-discipline projects; construction contracts with an estimated range valued between $500,000 and $15M that are similar in scope, magnitude, trade, complexity and contract type of those required under the solicitation, including the specifications and drawings, contract environment, subcontractor interaction, and price.
(b) Performance Surveys: The government will evaluate the quality and extent of offeror's performance deemed relevant to the requirements of this RFP. The government will use information submitted by the offeror and other sources such as other Federal Government offices and commercial sources, to assess performance. Provide a list of no more than ten (10), of the most relevant contracts performed for Federal agencies and commercial customers within the last three (3) years. The evaluation of past performance information will take into account past performance information regarding predecessor companies, key personnel who have relevant experience, or subcontractors that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement when such information is relevant to the instant acquisition. Furnish the following information for each contract listed:
(i) Company/Division name
(ii) Product/Service
(iii) Contracting Agency/Customer
(iv) Contract Number
(v) Contract Dollar Value
(vi) Period of Performance
(vii) Verified, up-to-date name, address, FAX & telephone number of the contracting officer
(viii) Comments regarding compliance with contract terms and conditions
(ix) Comments regarding any known performance deemed unacceptable to the customer, or not in accordance with the contract terms and conditions.
(x) Management
(xi) Quality Control and Material Workmanship
(xii) Timeliness/Adherence to schedule
(xiiv) Working relationship
(xiv) Environmental awareness
(c).As soon as practicable, offerors shall email the Past Performance Questionnaire (Attachment 4) to all points of contact (POCs) the offeror will be using to gather past performace information. Past Performance Questionnaires must be received by 9 CONS/LGCA not later than 1600 on 8 August 2011. The POCs will complete the questionnaires and forward them by FAX to 530-634-3311 or e-mail to Andrew.gibson@beale.af.mil and/or john.pank@beale.af.mil RESPONDENTS TO THE QUESTIONNAIRES SHALL NOT SEND THE COMPLETED INFORMATION SHEETS BACK TO THE OFFEROR. Offerors shall follow-up with respondents to ensure they have completed the questionnaires.
If a teaming arrangement is contemplated, provide complete information as to the arrangement, including any relevant and recent past performance information on previous teaming arrangements with same partner. If this is a first time joint effort, each party to the arrangement must provide a list of past and present relevant contracts.
(d) Subcontractor Consent: Past performance information pertaining to a subcontractor cannot be disclosed to the prime offeror without the subcontractor’s consent. Provide with the proposal a letter from all subcontractors that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement, consenting to the release of their past performance information to the prime contractor.
D. Documents submitted in response to this RFP must be fully responsive to and consistent with the following:
1. Requirements of the RFP (CLINs & PWS) and government standards and regulations pertaining to the PWS.
2. Evaluation Factors for Award in Section M of this RFP.
3. Any limitation on the number of proposal pages. Pages exceeding the page limitations set forth in this Section L will not be read or evaluated, and will be removed from the proposal.
4. Format for proposal Parts II and III shall be as follows:
(a) The proposals will be 8 1/2” x 11” paper except for fold-outs used for charts, tables, or diagrams, which may not exceed 11” x 17”.
(b) A page is defined as one face of a sheet of paper containing information.
(c) Typing shall not be less than 12 pitch.
(d) Elaborate formats, bindings or color presentations are not desired or required.
E. General Information
Point of Contact
The Contracting Officer (CO) is the sole point of contact for this acquisition. Address any questions or concerns you may have to the CO. Written requests for clarification may be sent to the CO at the address located in Section A of the model contract/solicitation. (If the CO will be using a source selection facility, consider inserting the address of that source selection facility here.)
Debriefings
The CO will promptly notify offerors of any decision to exclude them from the competitive range; whereupon, they may request and receive a debriefing in accordance with FAR 15.505. Offerors excluded from the competitive range may request a pre-award debriefing or they may choose to wait until after the source selection decision to request a post-award debriefing. However, offerors excluded from the competitive range are entitled to no more than one debriefing for each proposal. The CO will notify unsuccessful offerors in the competitive range of the source selection decision in accordance with FAR 15.506. Upon such notification, unsuccessful offerors may request and receive a debriefing. Offerors desiring a debriefing must make their request in accordance with the requirements of FAR 15.505 or 15.506, as applicable.
Discrepancies
If an offeror believes that the requirements in these instructions contain an error, omission, or are otherwise unsound, the offeror shall immediately notify the CO in writing with supporting rationale as well as the remedies the offeror is asking the CO to consider as related to the omission or error. (NOTE: Add the following sentence unless FAR 52.215-1(f) Alternate I applies, i.e., unless you have indicated that you intend to have discussions.) The offeror is reminded that the Government reserves the right to award this effort based on the initial proposal, as received, without discussion. This reservation includes matters of additional or substitute pages of the initial proposal.
Electronic Reference Documents
All referenced documents for this solicitation are available on the Federal Business Opportunities (FedBizOpps) web site at http://www.fedbizopps.gov. Potential offerors are encouraged to subscribe for real-time e-mail notifications when information has been posted to the website for this solicitation. (insert progr (If any necessary documents are not available on FedBizOpps, provide instructions on how potential offerors may obtain those documents (e.g., posted on FedTeds, or use of a Reading Room).)
Communications
(See Section L Guide, paragraph 3.3 for specifics on this Paragraph.)
Exchanges of source selection information between Government and offerors will be controlled by the Contracting Officer. Source selection information will be transmitted via hand delivery or certified mail. (fill-in as appropriate, e.g. fax, U.S.P.S, FedEx, UPS, pick-up by local representative, etc.)
SECTION M - EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD
The following have been modified:
SECTION M
SECTION M
Evaluation Factors for Award Proposal Evaluation Approach:
This acquisition will utilize Performance Price Tradeoff (PPT) procedures and will evaluate technical acceptability, price and past performance. The first step will be for all proposals to be evaluated for technical acceptability. The second step will list all technically acceptable proposals by price, lowest to highest. The third step will evaluate the past performance starting with the top of list and keep evaluating proposals until five proposals have a substantial confidence or satisfactory confidence rating. The SSA will then do an integrated Best Value assessment of the evaluated offerors. If after evaluation of all offers has been completed and if less than three have been judged to have substantial confidence or satisfacory confidence assement rating the SSA shall make and integrated best value award determination.
Basis for Contract Award:
This is a competitive best value source selection in which competing offerors' past performance history will be evaluated on a basis significantly more important than, cost or price considerations. By submission of its offer, the offeror accedes to all solicitation requirements, including terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements, in addition to those identified as evaluation factors or subfactors. All technically acceptable offers shall be treated equally except for their prices and performance records. Failure to meet a requirement may result in an offer being determined technically unacceptable. Offerors must clearly identify any exception to the solicitation terms and conditions and provide complete accompanying rationale. The evaluation process shall proceed as follows:
A. Technical Acceptability. The government technical evaluation team shall evaluate the technical proposals on a pass/fail basis, assigning ratings of Acceptable or Unacceptable. The proposals shall be evaluated against the following subfactors:
1) Thirty-five Percent (35%) Design
The standard is met when the proposal:
a. Meets the 35% design definition as stated in the statement of work for the MACC.
b. Includes the Original and three copies of drawings along with three CD copies, design analysis, outline specification(s) and cost estimate.
c. Drawings show 35% progress in all disciplines which include, main elements of work in the seed project statement of work.
(2) Drawings
a. Submits drawings 24" X 36".
b. Includes all drawings identified in the Seed Project.
c. Documents the work required by the Government statement of work for the seed project.
(3) Design Calculations
a. Submits a list of all engineering assumptions with the 35% design for:
1) Primary structural components as required;
2) Heating and ventilating loads and system performance requirements;
3) Short circuit calculations;
4) Sizing for electrical lighting panel;
5) Arc flash requirements;
6) Fire protection (single line/calculations);
7) Fire suppression (sprinkler layout/pipe sizing/hydraulic calculations)
b. Provides design criteria on drawings.
(4) AF Form 3052 Completion
a. Provides the Bid schedule in the Seed Project
b. Provides AF Form 3052, Construction Cost Estimate Breakdown.
(5) Confirmation of bonding capacity (minimum $10M per project, $20M aggregate) from bonding surety.
B. Price Evaluation. The government will list all technically acceptable proposals by price, lowest to highest. The price evaluation will document the reasonableness and affordability of the proposed total evaluated price.
C. Past Performance Evaluation. The purpose of the past performance evaluation is to allow the Government to assess the offeror’s ability to perform the efforts described in this RFP based on the offeror’s demonstrated present and past performance:
1. The Government past performance team will accomplish the past performance evaluation, assigning a performance confidence assessment rating to the offeror’s proposal based on the performance ratings of recent and relevant efforts.
2 The past performance team will seek relevant performance information from: (1) the references provided by the offeror; (2) Past Performance Questionnaires received from the points of contact provided in the past performance information sheets and/or other points of contact identified by the Government that are past or current customers; (3) data independently obtained from Government and commercial sources. The past performance evaluation will take into account past performance information regarding predecessor companies, key personnel or major subcontractors. However, past performance regarding predecessor companies, key personnel who have relevant and recent experience, or subcontractors that will perform major aspects of the requirement will not be rated as highly as past performance information for the principal offeror.
2.1. Recency - ongoing contracts with a performance history, and contracts completed within three (3) years from the issue date of this solicitation.
2.2. Relevant performance (Table 1) - Relevant projects include a demonstrated record of successful design/build, build, and completion of multi-discipline projects; construction contracts with an estimated range valued between $500,000 and $15M that are similar in scope, magnitude, trade, complexity and contract type of those required under the solicitation, including the specifications and drawings, contract environment, subcontractor interaction, and price.
2.3. Performance. Performance information may be obtained from the references on each project package submitted. The Government may also obtain performance data from other sources.
2.4. In addition to evaluating the extent to which the offeror’s performance meets basic contract
Statement of Work (SOW) and technical requirements, the assessment may consider things such as: (1) History of completing efforts involving repair, sustainment, renovation and/or construction of facilities, valued in excess of $5,000,000; (2) Management Effectiveness; (3) Quality of Service and Workmanship; (4) Timeliness/Adherence to Schedules; (5) Quality Control; (6) Customer Satisfaction (7) Compliance with Environmental/Labor/Safety.
2.5. When relevant performance information indicates performance problems, the Government will consider the number and severity of the problems, and the appropriateness and effectiveness of any corrective actions taken (not just planned or promised). The Government may review more recent contracts or performance evaluations to ensure corrective actions have been implemented, and to evaluate their effectiveness.
3. Joint Ventures. In a joint venture, past performance for both businesses will be evaluated equally. Joint ventures will be verified with the Small Business Administration (SBA) prior to award.
4. Teaming Arrangements. Teaming Arrangements are characterized by two or more business entities that are working together under the representation of one of the existing business entities for the duration of the contract. A teaming arrangement is not a formal merger of two or more business entities. The Government recognizes the validity and integrity of teaming arrangements as detailed in FAR Subpart 9.6. All offerors are encouraged to review FAR Subpart 9.6, to acquaint themselves with its details. Since the Government can only determine the responsibility of the prime contractor, per FAR 9.604(b), in accordance with FAR 9.1, Responsible Prospective Contractors, offerors must identify in their offer any teaming arrangement to be considered and completely identify the relationships/responsibilities of the teaming members.
5. The past performance team will integrate the recency, relevancy and performance on all the efforts evaluated for the offeror; the integration will result in a performance confidence assessment of (“Substantial Confidence”, “Satisfactory Confidence”, “Limited Confidence”, “No Confidence” or “Unknown Confidence”) as defined below. In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance, or for whom past performance information is not available, or when a past performance record is so limited that no confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned, the offeror shall receive an assessment of “Unknown Confidence”, meaning the assessment is treated neither favorably nor unfavorably on past performance.
TABLE 2 - PERFORMANCE CONFIDENCE ASSESSMENTS
| Rating |
| Description |
| SUBSTANTIAL CONFIDENCE |
| Based on the offeror’s performance record, the government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. |
| SATISFACTORY CONFIDENCE |
| Based on the offeror’s performance record, the government has an expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. |
| LIMITED CONFIDENCE |
| Based on the offeror’s performance record, the government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. |
NO
CONFIDENCE
Based on the offeror’s performance record, the government has no expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.
| UNKNOWN CONFIDENCE |
| No performance record is identifiable or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned. |
6. The SSA will do an integrated Best Value assessment of the evaluated offerors and award to a minimum of three (3) offerors and up to five (5) offerors.
D. Other Considerations. Offerors are cautioned to submit sufficient information and in the format specified in Section L. Offerors may be asked to clarify certain aspects of their proposal (for example, the relevance of past performance information) or respond to adverse past performance information, to which the offeror has not previously had an opportunity to respond. Adverse past performance information, is defined as past performance information that supports a less than satisfactory rating on any evaluation element, or any unfavorable comments received from sources without a formal rating system. Clarifications conducted to resolve relevance of the past performance information, adverse past performance information or minor clerical errors will not constitute discussions.
1. The Government intends to award a contract without discussions with respective offerors. Therefore each initial offer should contain the offeror’s best price and past performance reference list. The Government, however, reserves the right to conduct discussions if deemed in its best interest.
(End of Summary of Changes)
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .