Attachment 4 Past Performance Information Sheet (Amendment 02_09152026).docx
DOCX document 30 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Historical Archives Digitization
- Solicitation number
- FA440727QTW02
About this file
This is a Past Performance Information Sheet template that requires offerors to submit three individual references demonstrating relevant recent experience for the Historical Archives Digitization solicitation (FA440727QTW02) issued by the Department of the Air Force Air Mobility Command for the Headquarters Cyberspace Capabilities Center at Scott AFB, Illinois.
Each of the three required references must document work performed within the past five years from the RFQ issuance date and must be relevant to comprehensive digitization, preservation, and media conversion solutions for physical and legacy digital historical archives. Offerors must complete separate PPI sheets for each reference, clearly identifying the performing company and their role if the work was executed by a subcontractor or teaming partner. Required information includes project title, contract/order number, customer/agency details with points of contact willing to participate in performance interviews, total contract value, period of performance dates, detailed narrative of work performed with specific relevance to the SOW requirements (secure high-fidelity conversion of paper records, microfilm, microfiche, large-format schematics, bound books, and legacy audiovisual media into standard searchable digital files), and evidence of performance quality through CPARS records, letters of recommendation, or customer surveys. By submitting this information, offerors grant the U.S. Government permission to contact references to verify performance claims.
View the file
Other files
Show all 25
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment 4 – Past Performance Information Sheet (PPI) *Updated 09/15/2026*
INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS:
Three individual (3) References are required. Complete one individual PPI Sheet for each reference submitted.
The references must be recent and relevant as defined in the RFQ.
· Recent is defined as work performed within the past five (5) years from the issuance date of this RFQ.
· Relevant is defined as comprehensive digitization, preservation, and media conversion solution for its physical and legacy digital historical archives as described in the Statement of Work.
If a reference is for a project performed by a subcontractor or teaming partner, clearly identify the company that performed the work and describe their specific role in the project.
Project Reference ______ of 3
1. GENERAL INFORMATION
Project Title:
Contract/Order Number:
| Performing Company: |
| (Identify if Prime, Subcontractor, or Teaming Partner) |
2. CUSTOMER / AGENCY INFORMATION
Customer/Agency Name:
Point of Contact (POC) Name:
POC Title:
POC Phone Number:
POC Email Address:
Is this POC willing to be contacted for a performance interview/survey? (Circle One): YES / NO
3. CONTRACT DETAILS
| Total Contract/Order Value: |
| $ |
| Period of Performance (Start): |
| (MM/DD/YYYY) |
| Period of Performance (End): |
| (MM/DD/YYYY) |
4. DESCRIPTION OF WORK PERFORMED
Provide a detailed narrative of the work performed. Describe precisely how this project is relevant to the requirements in this RFQ's Statement of Work (SOW): perform secure, highfidelity conversion of paper records, microfilm, microfiche, large-format schematics, bound books, and legacy audiovisual media into standard, searchable digital files and the work associated with this project that adhere to all applicable standards, regulations, and guidelines.
5. EVIDENCE OF PERFORMANCE QUALITY
Indicate the type of performance assessment available for this project. If available, please attach any letters of recommendation.
· CPARS: Is a CPARS record available for this contract/order? (Circle One): YES / NO If YES, provide the CPARS rating(s) for key evaluation areas (e.g., Quality, Schedule, Cost Control, Management):
· Letter of Recommendation: Is a letter of recommendation attached? (Circle One): YES / NO
· Other: Please describe any other form of performance assessment provided (e.g., customer survey).
By submitting this information, the offeror grants the U.S. Government permission to contact the listed customer points of contact to verify the information provided and to inquire about the offeror's performance on the cited contracts.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .