Attachment 10 - PPQ GAFB FY24 SABER -Revised Amendment 0001-.pdf

PDF 363 KB Posted

Attached to
Simplified Acquisition of Base Engineering Requirements (SABER-IDIQ) Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA303024R0004
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Air Education and Training Command

About this file

This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) for a federal contract opportunity to provide Simplified Acquisition of Base Engineering Requirements (SABER) services at Goodfellow Air Force Base. The 17th Contracting Squadron is conducting a competitive source selection and is requesting past performance information from organizations that have worked with the offerors. The PPQ covers areas such as quality control, schedule, cost, management, and overall performance. The associated federal contract opportunity is for a single-award Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract to perform maintenance, alteration, repair, and minor construction work at Goodfellow AFB. The contract has a basic period plus four one-year option periods, a guaranteed minimum of $750,000, and a maximum of $25,000,000. The opportunity is set-aside for certified 8(a) business concerns under NAICS code 236220. The Request for Proposal is expected to be issued around June 20, 2024 with an anticipated closing date of July 5, 2024.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Simplified Acquisition of Base Engineering Requirements (SABER-IDIQ), newest first.
File Type Posted
Solicitation Amendment FA303024R00040003 SF 30.pdf PDF
Attachment 19 - FY24 SABER Q and A Worksheet Amendment 0003.pdf PDF
Attachment 13c - Seed RFP Construct Raised Crosswalks Topographical Drawing Amendment 0002-.pdf PDF
Attachment 14a - Revised Seed RFP_SOO with Drawings Water Main Hornet and Scherz Amendment 0002-.pdf PDF
Attachment 2 - Section L Instructions to Offerors -Revised Amendment 0002.pdf PDF
Attachment 3 - Section M Evaluation Factors -Revised Amendment 0002-.pdf PDF
Attachment 20 - Site Visit Sign-In Sheet FY24 SABER FA303024R0004 27 June 2024.pdf PDF
Solicitation Amendment - FA303024R00040002.pdf PDF
Attachment 12c - Seed RFP B705 - Bldg 121 Changing Rooms Photo Examples Amendment 0002-.pdf PDF
Solicitation Amendment FA303024R00040002 SF 30 CO Signed.pdf PDF
Attachment 15a - Seed RFP_SOO with Drawings Water Main Lancaster and Canberra Amendment 0002-.pdf PDF
Attachment 19 - FY24 SABER Q and A Worksheet Amendment 0002.pdf PDF
Solicitation Amendment FA303024R00040001 SF 30.pdf PDF
Attachment 2 - Section L Instructions to Offerors -Revised Amendment 0001-.pdf PDF
Attachment 12 - Seed RFP B705 Renovate Changing Rooms -Revised Amendment 0001-.pdf PDF
Attachment 13 - Seed RFP Construct Raised Crosswalks -Revised Amendment 0001-.pdf PDF
Attachment 14 - Seed RFP Water Mains Hornet and Scherz -Revised Amendment 0001-.pdf PDF
Solicitation Amendment - FA303024R00040001.pdf PDF
Attachment 15 - Seed RFP Water Mains Lancaster and Canberra -Revised Amendment 0001-.pdf PDF
Attachment 11 Relevant Contracts FY24 SABER -Revised Amendment 0001-.pdf PDF
Attachment 3 - Section M Evaluation Factors -Revised Amendment 0001-.pdf PDF
Solicitation - FA303024R0004.pdf PDF
Attachment 16 - (CUI) BAL Template 21 SEP 2022.docx DOCX document
Attachment 14 - Seed RFP Water Mains Hornet and Scherz CO Sign.pdf PDF
Attachment 13 - Seed RFP Construct Raised Crosswalks CO Sign.pdf PDF
Attachment 13a - Seed RFP Construct Raised Crosswalks SOO.pdf PDF
Attachment 12 - Seed RFP B705 Renovate Changing Rooms CO Sign.pdf PDF
Attachment 12b - Seed RFP B705 Renovate Changing Rooms B705 Floor Plan.pdf PDF
Attachment 9 - Coefficient Pricing Worksheet.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 4 - SABERSPECS2024 - Updated 07May2024.pdf PDF
Attachment 18 - NAF Standard Clauses -01May2024-.pdf PDF
Attachment 15a - Seed RFP Water Mains Lancaster and Canberra SOO.pdf PDF
Attachment 14a - Seed RFP Water Mains Hornet and Scherz SOO.pdf PDF
Attachment 12a - Seed RFP B705 Renovate Changing Rooms SOO.pdf PDF
Attachment 11 Relevant Contracts FY24 SABER.pdf PDF
Attachment 6 - Wage Determination Building.pdf PDF
Attachment 2 - Section L Instructions to Offerors.pdf PDF
Attachment 1 - Section H Special Contract Requirements.pdf PDF
Attachment 17 - Site Visit Itinerary and Map - FY24 SABER Goodfellow AFB.pdf PDF
Attachment 15b - Seed RFP Water Mains Lancaster and Canberra Water Drawing.pdf PDF
Attachment 15 - Seed RFP Water Mains Lancaster and Canberra CO Sign.pdf PDF
Attachment 10 - PPQ GAFB FY24 SABER.pdf PDF
Attachment 7 - Wage Determination Heavy and Highway.pdf PDF
Attachment 5 - CEREG_17June_2024.pdf PDF
Attachment 3 - Section M Evaluation Factors.pdf PDF
Attachment 15c - Seed RFP Water Mains Lancaster and Canberra Composite Utility Drawing.pdf PDF
Attachment 14b - Seed RFP Water Mains Hornet and Scherz Concept Drawing Water Main.pdf PDF
Attachment 13b - Seed RFP Construct Raised Crosswalks Drawing Set.pdf PDF
Attachment 8 - Wage Determination Residential.pdf PDF
Show all 49

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

For Official Use Only When completed, this document is Source Selection Information IAW FAR 2.101 and 3.104.

Attachment 10: Past Performance Questionnaire (Revised 24 June 2024)

For Official Use Only Page 1 of 7

The 17th Contracting Squadron in Goodfellow AFB is in the process of competitively selecting a source for the base’s Simplified Acquisition Base Engineering Requirement Contract. One of the considerations in proposal evaluation is the verification of the offerors' past performance on contracts or other work efforts which reflect the offeror's ability to perform on the proposed effort. We depend on information received from organizations such as yours, which have had first-hand experience with the offeror, for the evaluation of the offeror's performance on those contracts or work efforts.

Our areas of interest regarding the offeror are summarized in the enclosed questionnaire. In order to meet the acquisition milestones, we request your written response no later than 1:00 PM CST 01 August 2024. This schedule will allow us sufficient time to analyze the data prior to the start of negotiations. Please return the questionnaire via email to kendol.dunlap@us.af.mil and kyara.forte@us.af.mil. Your completed questionnaire will become a part of the official source selection records and kept confidential. Questions or comments may be emailed to the previously mentioned e-mail.

Your assistance is greatly appreciated and your prompt response will be one of the keys to the successful and timely completion of this Source Selection.

JOHN M. HEBDON

Contracting Officer http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/02.htm#P10_602 http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/03.htm#P41_5836 mailto:kendol.dunlap@us.af.mil mailto:kyara.forte@us.af.mil

For Official Use Only Page 2 of 7

Section 1: Contract Identification

A. Contractor (Company/Division):

B. Contractor Cage Code:

C. Contract Number:

D. Contract Type (e.g., FFP, FPIF, CPIF, CPFF, etc.):

E. Program Title:

F. Brief Program Description:

G. Program Phase (e.g., Engineering & Manufacturing Development (EMD)):

H. Period of Performance

1. Original Schedule (assuming all options exercised):

Beginning Date _________ through ____________

2. Current Schedule (assuming all options exercised):

Beginning Date _________ through ____________

3. Reason for difference (if applicable):

I. Contract Dollar Value

1. Original maximum contract dollar value (assuming all options exercised): $

2. Current maximum contract dollar value (assuming all options exercised): $

3. Reasons for difference between original and current contract dollar value (if applicable):

J. Description of work performed:

K. Was this a competitively awarded contract? ☐ Yes ☐ No

L. Contractor’s Role: ☐ Prime Contractor ☐ Subcontractor ☐ Key Personnel

Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last three (3) years, please complete separate Past Performance Questionnaire forms for those contracts as well.

Section 2: Customer or Agency Identification

A. Customer or agency name:

B. Customer or agency description (if applicable):

For Official Use Only Page 3 of 7

C. Geographic description of work performed under this contract (i.e., local, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands):

Section 3: Respondent Identification

A. Respondent’s name:

B. Respondent’s title:

C. Respondent’s phone/fax number/e-mail address:

D. Length of time (number of years/months) respondent worked on subject contract and description of responsibility/position/role:

E. Other suggested points of contact:

Section 4: Performance Information

In the table below, indicate your rating for the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block to the right of each question. Provide supporting information for each response in the space provided. Attach additional pages if more space is needed. The performance rating scale is defined as follows:

Code Performance Rating

E EXCEPTIONAL – Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

V VERY GOOD – Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements to the

Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

S SATISFACTORY – Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

M MARGINAL – Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

U UNSATISFACTORY – Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

For Official Use Only Page 4 of 7

N/A NOT APPLICABLE – Unable to provide a rating. Contract did not include performance for this aspect, performance was not observed, or information was not available. Do not know.

Note: The following are SAMPLE questions. Past Performance evaluation teams MUST construct a simple and concise Past Performance Questionnaire, tailored to seek out key information tied to the significant aspects of the planned acquisition. Avoid questions that can be answered with a “yes” or “no” but instead include probing and direct questions to draw out the required information desired.

The Contractor: E V S M U N/A

1. Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.

SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

2. Demonstrated the ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period.

3. Delegated authority to project managers and supervisors commensurate with contract requirements.

4. Home office participated in solving significant local problems.

5. Followed approved quality control plan.

6. Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements.

7. Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures.

For Official Use Only Page 5 of 7

8. Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies.

9. Identified problems as they occurred.

10. Suggested alternative approaches to problems.

11. Displayed initiative to solve problems.

12. Developed realistic progress schedules.

13. Met established project schedules.

14. Provided timely resolution of deficiency.

15. Was responsive to contract changes.

16. Provided adequate project supervision.

For Official Use Only Page 6 of 7

17. Paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner.

18. Provided accurate and complete line item cost proposals including all aspects of work required for each task.

19. Cooperated with Government personnel after award.

20. How would you rate the contractor's overall performance on this contract?

21. Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract?

If yes, explain.

EXPLANATION:

☐ Yes

☐ No

22. Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain.

EXPLANATION:

☐ Yes

☐ No

IF THIS WAS A GOVERNMENT CONTRACT:

Did this contract include FAR 52.219-9, Small Business Subcontracting Plan?

☐ Yes ☐ No

If yes, did the contractor comply with the clause? Please explain.

Did this contract include FAR 52.219-8, Utilization of Small Business Concerns?

For Official Use Only Page 7 of 7

☐ Yes ☐ No

If yes, did the contractor comply with the clause? Please explain.

Additional remarks:

[click and pick the date]

Respondent’s Signature Date

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!

Please return this completed questionnaire to:

E-Mail to: kendol.dunlap@us.af.mil

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .