ATCH_13_10_May_13_PAST_AND_PRESENT_PERFORMANCE_QUESTIONNAIRE.pdf

PDF 79 KB Posted

Attached to
Air Combat Training Systems (ACTS) Services Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA300213R0026
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Materiel Command Installation and Mission Support Center Installation Contracting Agency

About this file

ATCH 13 Past and Present Performance Questionnaire

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Air Combat Training Systems (ACTS) Services, newest first.
File Type Posted
FA3002-13-R-0026-0004_ACTS_PoP_Amendment.doc DOC document
RFP_Amendment_3.pdf PDF
Appendix_7_19_Jul_13.pdf PDF
Appendix_1_19_Jul_13.pdf PDF
Appendix_3_19_Jul_13.pdf PDF
Appendix_4_19_Jul_13.pdf PDF
Appendix_2_19_Jul_13.pdf PDF
RFP_Amendment_3.pdf PDF
Changes_to_Appendices_23_Jul_13.pdf PDF
Appendix_9__19_Jul_13.pdf PDF
Appendix_8_19_Jul_13.pdf PDF
PWS_Summary_of_Changes.pdf PDF
Appendix_6_19_Jul_13.pdf PDF
Appendix_5_19_Jul_13.pdf PDF
PWS_31_Jul_13.pdf PDF
FA3002-13-R-0026-0002.pdf PDF
UPDATED_31_Jul_13_FA3002-13-R-0026_Amendment_0001.pdf PDF
Luke_AFB_Questions-_Updated_30_July_2013.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Luke_AFB_Questions.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Holloman_AFB_Q A.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Q A_1.docx DOCX document
ATCH_8_8_May_13_PWS_Appendix_7.pdf PDF
ATCH_9_8_May_13__PWS_Appendix_8.pdf PDF
ATCH_1_10_May_13_Performance_Work_Statement_(PWS).pdf PDF
ATCH_17_1_July_13_Contract_Security_Classification_Specification_(DD_Form_254).pdf PDF
ATCH_16_10_May_13_CBA_Luke_AFB _AZ_(WD_No2013-0111).PDF PDF
ATCH_7_16_May_13__PWS_Appendix_6.pdf PDF
ATCH_14_10_May_13_PAST_PERFORMANCE_INFORMATION_SHEET.pdf PDF
ATCH_3_10_May_13__PWS_Appendix_2.pdf PDF
FA3002-13-R-0026_ACTS_RFP.pdf PDF
ATCH_6_10_May_13__PWS_Appendix_5.pdf PDF
ATCH_10_8_May_13__PWS_Appendix_9.pdf PDF
ATCH_12_10_May_13_Past_Performance_Cover_Letter.pdf PDF
ATCH_5_8_May_13__PWS_Appendix_4.pdf PDF
ATCH_11_10_May_13__Wage_Determination_Holloman_AFB.pdf PDF
ATCH_2_10_May_13__PWS_Appendix_1.pdf PDF
ATCH_15__10_May_13_PAST_PERFORMANCE_CONSENT_FORM.pdf PDF
ATCH_4_8_May_13__PWS_Appendix_3.pdf PDF
ACTS_FA300213R0026.pdf PDF
Show all 39

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

FA3002-13-R-0026

Attachment 13

ATTACHMENT 13

PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

WHEN FILLED IN THIS DOCUMENT IS SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION IN

ACCORDANCE WITH FAR 2.101 FAR 3.104

A. GENERAL INFORMATION: Please correct any information below known to be inaccurate:

Contractor’s Name: Address:

Telephone Number:

Fax Number:

Point of Contact:

Project Title or Brief Description of Work:

Contract Number Provided by Offeror: Dollar Amount:

Contract Period or Dates of Performance Provided by Offeror:

*Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last 3 years, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.

Contractor performed as the: Prime Contractor Sub-Contractor Key Personnel.

B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION:

Name of Respondent: ________________ Title: ________________________________ Address: __________________________ Telephone Number: _____________________ Fax Number: ______________________ Email Address: ________________________

C. **EMAIL/SCAN COMPLETED SURVEY DIRECTLY TO THE CONTRACTING OFFICER**

Ms. Millie Vigil at mildred.vigil@us.af.mil

D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the number on the scale of 0 to 5 that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation.

PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS.

PERFORMANCE

RATING DEFINITION

(5) Exceptional

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

(4) Very Good

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

(3) Satisfactory

Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element being assessed contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

(2) Marginal

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

(1) Unsatisfactory

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

(0) Not Applicable Unable to provide a score. Performance in this area is not applicable to the effort assessed.

CONTRACTOR’S NAME: ________________________ CONTRACT

NUMBER___________________

Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.

Contractor E VG S M U NA Followed approved quality control plan.

Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures.

Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements.

Identified problems as they occurred.

Provided timely resolution of contract performance discrepancies.

Suggested alternative approaches to problems.

Home office participated in solving significant local problems.

Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.

Demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period.

Site manager performed duties and provided adequate supervision and leadership of contractor team.

Contractor's use of cross-utilized employees allowed PWS requirements to be met.

Contractor E VG S M U NA Personnel in key positions possessed adequate experience and education.

If contractor utilized one-deep manning in a given position, adequate back up was availabile to ensure PWS accomplishment.

Met the requirements of the contract.

If the contract was is in a geographical area with insufficient local skilled workers, contractor recruited outside labor sufficient to meet PWS requirements.

Met established project schedules.

Contractor provided and adhered to training plan to ensure employees maintained currency throughout life of the contract.

Contractor provided and followed adequate mobilization or phase in plan.

Paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner.

Provided accurate and complete line item cost/price proposals including all aspects of work required for each task.

How would you rate the contractor's overall performance?

Was responsive to contract changes.

Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.”

YES/NO

Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “remarks.”

YES/NO

Is the contractor rated in CPARS? YES/NO

CONTRACTOR’S NAME: ___________________ CONTRACT NUMBER __________

Remarks:_____________________________________________________________________________

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .