Attachment_L-08_Performance_Eval_Questionnaire.pdf

FA252119RA007

(REF) FA2521-18-R-0024

RFP Attachment L-08

Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ)

The 45th Space Wing of the Air Force, 45th Contracting Squadron is in the process of competitively selecting a source for Instrumentation Range Support Program (IRSP) III, FA2521-18-R-0024.

One of the considerations in proposal evaluation is the verification of the offerors' past performance on contracts or other work efforts which reflect the offeror's ability to perform on the proposed effort. We depend on information received from organizations such as yours, which have had first-hand experience with the offeror, for the evaluation of the offeror's performance on those contracts or work efforts.

Our areas of interest regarding the offeror are summarized in the enclosed questionnaire.

In order to meet the acquisition milestones, we request your written response no later than TBD. This schedule will allow us sufficient time to analyze the data prior to the start of negotiations.

To assist you in preparing your response and expediting your reply, the questionnaire may be filled out electronically and e-mailed to bradley.richardson@us.af.mil, charles.tarantola@us.af.mil AND kristin.doty@us.af.mil or by hand and Mailed to:

45th Contracting Squadron/PKDA ATTN: Bradley Richardson, Charles Tarantola, Kristin Doty 1201 Edward H. White II St.

Patrick AFB, FL. 32925-3242

Please call Kristin Doty at (321) 494-9964 if you have any questions. Your completed questionnaire will become a part of the official Source Selection records.

Your assistance is greatly appreciated and your prompt response will be one of the keys to the successful and timely completion of this Source Selection.

When Filled In This Document Is Source Selection Sensitive IAW FAR 2.101 and Far 3.104

For Official Use Only When Filled In This Document Is Source Selection Sensitive IAW FAR 2.101 and Far 3.104

DRAFT

FA2521-18-R-0024

Instrumentation Range Support Program

Attachment L-08 For Official Use Only

When Filled In This Document Is Source Selection Sensitive IAW FAR 2.101 and Far 3.104

When Filled In This Document Is Source Selection Sensitive IAW FAR 2.101 and Far 3.104

SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

A. Contractor (Company/Division):

B. Address:

C. Cage Code of contractor contract was awarded to:

D: Contract Number:

E. Contract Type (e.g., FFP, FPIF, CPIF, CPFF, etc.):

F. Was this a competitive contract? YES____ NO ____

G. Program Title:

H. Brief Program Description:

I. Period of Performance:

J. Contract Dollar Value

1. Original maximum contract dollar value (assuming all options exercised): $

2. Current maximum contract dollar value (assuming all options exercised): $

3. Reasons for difference between original and current contract dollar value (if applicable):

K. Description of work performed:

L. Contractor’s Role: Prime______ Subcontactor ______ Key Personnel _____

M. PRIMARY POINTS OF CONTACT: (The offeror/joint venture member/critical subcontractor is responsible for exerting its best efforts to ensure that current information is provided for all individuals.)

Name and Office Symbol Phone Number Email/Other Contact Info

1. Procuring Contracting Officer/Contract Negotiator or equivalent

2. Program/Project Manager or equivalent

3. Administrative Contracting Officer/Contract Specialist or equivalent

Attachment L-08 For Official Use Only

When Filled In This Document Is Source Selection Sensitive IAW FAR 2.101 and Far 3.104

When Filled In This Document Is Source Selection Sensitive IAW FAR 2.101 and Far 3.104

SECTION 2. CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION

A. Customer or agency name:

B. Customer or agency description (if applicable):

C. Geographic description of services under this contract, i.e. local, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands:

SECTION 3. RESPONDENT IDENTIFICATION

A. Respondent’s name:

B. Respondent’s title:

C. Respondent’s phone number / fax number / e-mail address:

D. Respondent’s positon (e.g., Program Manager, PCO/ACO, etc.):

E. Length of time (number of years/months) respondent worked on subject contract and description of responsibility/position/role:

F. Other suggested points of contact:

SECTION 4: PERFORMANCE INFORMATION

In the tables below, indicate your rating for the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block to the right of each question. Provide supporting information for each response in the space provided. Attach additional pages if more space is needed.

The performance rating scale is defined as follows:

CODE PERFORMANCE LEVEL

E EXCEPTIONAL - During the contract period, contractor performance is meeting (or met) all contract requirements and consistently exceeding (or exceeded) many. Very few, if any, minor problems encountered.

Contractor took immediate and effective corrective action.

V VERY GOOD - During the contract period, contractor is meeting (or met) all contract requirements and consistently exceeding (or exceeded) some.

Some minor problems encountered. Contractor took timely corrective action.

S SATISFACTORY - During the contract period, contractor performance is meeting (or met) all contract requirements. For any problems encountered, Attachment L-08 For Official Use Only

When Filled In This Document Is Source Selection Sensitive IAW FAR 2.101 and Far 3.104 contractor took effective corrective action.

M MARGINAL - During the contract period, contractor performance is not meeting (or did not meet) some contract requirements. For problems encountered, corrective action appeared only marginally effective, not effective, or not fully implemented. Customer involvement was required.

U UNSATISFACTORY - During the contract period, contractor performance is failing (or fail) to meet most contract requirements. Serious problems encountered Corrective actions were either ineffective or non-existent.

Extensive Customer oversight and involvement was required.

N NOT APPLICABLE - Unable to provide a rating. Contract did not include performance for this aspect. Do not know.

Program Management E V S M U N

1. Quality/effectiveness of sub-contracted efforts

2. Effectiveness of overall contract management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program)

3. Successfully responded to emergency and/or surge situations

4. Ability to hire/apply and a qualified workforce to this effort.

5. Ability to retain a qualified workforce on this effort.

6. Ability to identify high-risk areas and apply mitigations to minimize risk.

7. Ability to smoothly transition resources and personnel.

8. Effectiveness on maintaining continuity of mission support while transitioning/phasing in resources and personnel to support other efforts.

9. Contractor implemented responsive/flexible processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the customer

10. Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract

Attachment L-08

11. Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes)

12. Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance

13. Quality of depot support functions to include inventory management, filling of requisitions, and stock replenishment

Supply Requirements

14. Quality of Overhauls performed

15. Adherence to schedule

Specialized Expertise

19. Quality of Technical Investigations

20. Quality of control, scheduling and monitoring of engineering tasks

21. Contractor proposed alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the customer

16. Quality of Designs, fabrication, installation, and testing of system mods

17. Responsiveness to discrepancies found post acceptance on system mod/mods

18. Adherence to schedule

Attachment L-08

22. Ability to solve obsolescence issues

23. Adherence to schedule

Logistics Support

24. Effectiveness in material management

25. Quality of relationship with vendors

26. Effective identification of appropriate parts and equipment stock levels

27. Quality of Component Remanufacture/Fabrication and Form Fit Function

28. Effectiveness of transportation of materials to receiving points

29. Adherence to schedule

Cost Performance

30. Accuracy in forecasting contract costs

31. Ability to meet forecasted costs and perform within contract costs

Attachment L-08

32. Ability to alert Government of unforeseen costs before they occur

33. Sufficiency and timeliness of cost reporting

2. Please discuss each response for which you indicated the contractor has performed exceptionally well or unsatisfactory in response to the questions above (use additional sheets, if necessary).

3. Government Contracts Only: Has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?

Yes Default Convenience_______ Pending______ No_____________

If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules, etc).

Attachment L-08

SECTION 5: NARRATIVE

SUMMARY

What were the contractor’s most positive aspects in the performance of the contract?

What was the contractor’s most negative aspect in the performance of the contract?

Would you have any reservations about soliciting this contractor in the future or having them perform one of your critical and demanding programs?

Attachment L-08

Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired.

Evaluator’s Signature Date

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!

Please return this completed questionnaire to:

Mailing Address: 45CONS/PKDA

Attn: Bradley Richardson, Charles Tarantola, Kristin Doty 1201 Edward H. White II St.

Patrick AFB FL 32925

Or email to: bradley.richardson@us.af.mil, charles.tarantola@us.af.mil AND kristin.doty@us.af.mil