PNT 28 July.doc
DOC document 209 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Advisory & Assistance Services & Systems Engineering & Technical Assistance Services for Headquarters, Air Force Space Command Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA2517-08-R-9000
About this file
PNT PWS
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 50
Advisory & Assistance Services & Systems Engineering & Technical Assistance Services for Headquarters, Air Force Space Command has more files on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
HEADQUARTERS AIR FORCE SPACE COMMAND
POSITION, NAVIGATION AND TIMING (PNT) MISSION CAPABILITY SERVICES
Performance Work Statement
29 JULY 2008
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0. DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES
1.1. SCOPE
1.2. MISSION
1.3. REQUIREMENTS
1.3.1. SPACE BASED NAVIGATION SYSTEMS SERVICES
1.3.2. GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM (GPS)
1.4. QUALITY PROGRAM PLAN
2.0. SERVICES SUMMARY
4.0. GENERAL INFORMATION
4.1.
SUPERVISION OF EMPLOYEE
4.2.
CONTRACTOR IDENTIFICATION
4.3.
CONTRACTOR/GOVERNMENT COMMUNICATION
4.4.
PRODUCT OWNERSHIP
4.5.
PROPRIETARY DATA
4.6.
PLACE OF PERFORMANCE
4.7.
DUTY HOURS
4.8.
LEGAL HOLIDAYS
4.9.
SECURITY REQUIREMENTS
Printer configuration may change page numbers.
1.0. DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES
This Performance Work Statement (PWS) provides for various Advisory and Assistance Services (A&AS) and Non-Advisory and Assistance Services (Non-A&AS) to Headquarters Air Force Space Command (HQ AFSPC) Position, Navigation and Timing (PNT) Mission Capability. This contract will serve as a vehicle to provide further broadened technical and analytical tools, support or improve policy development, management, and administration, or improve the operation of systems supporting PNT missions. PNT also requires various forms of support during several phases of planning, programming, acquisition, and implementation cycles of various government systems, and will need to complement the Government's technical expertise in accomplishing its mission. All services requested under this PWS are non-personal in nature.
1.1. Scope. In rendering the foregoing services, outputs may take the form of information, advice, opinions, alternatives, analyses, evaluations, recommendations, training and/or services to complement the Government’s technical expertise in accomplishing its mission. PNT has a continuing requirement for contracted support, both advisory and assistance services (A&AS) and non-advisory and assistance services (non-A&AS). The A&AS primarily comprises three major categories of services: Management, Operational and Professional Support Services; Studies, Analyses, and Evaluations; and Engineering and Technical Services. The non-A&AS primarily comprises two major categories of services: Information Management and Engineering Services. However, all services rendered under this contract require thorough knowledge and understanding of space vehicles and guided missiles and military and aerospace equipment and military weapons.
1.2. Mission. The mission of AFSPC is to defend the United States through the control and exploitation of space. This is accomplished by operating space systems; providing support from space to terrestrial forces; operating ballistic missile forces as a deterrent against nuclear attack; providing assured mission capability, including ground control support for designated Department of Defense (DoD) satellites through all levels of conflict; providing warning of a space ballistic missile attack; providing the ability to protect friendly satellites and to negate enemy spacecraft; and maintaining the Intercontinental Ballistic Missile (ICBM) force, people and materiel. The mission of AFSPC includes specific responsibilities as the Air Force component of US Strategic Command (USSTRATCOM) for space and ICBM forces, and as an Air Force Major Command (MAJCOM). These responsibilities are interrelated and entail specific relationships with other commands and agencies, both United States and Allied.
1.2.1. The fundamental goal of PNT is to ensure that the United States maintains space-based positioning, navigation, and timing services, augmentation, back-up, and service denial capabilities that provide uninterrupted availability of positioning, navigation, and timing services; meet growing national, homeland, economic security, and civil requirements, and scientific and commercial demands; remain the pre-eminent military space-based positioning, navigation, and timing service; continue to provide civil services that exceed or are competitive with foreign civil space-based positioning, navigation, and timing services and augmentation systems; remain essential components of internationally accepted positioning, navigation, and timing services; and promote U.S. technological leadership in applications involving space-based positioning, navigation, and timing services.
1.2.2. To achieve this goal, the United States Government shall:
· Provide uninterrupted access to U.S. space-based global, precise positioning, navigation, and timing services for U.S. and allied national security systems and capabilities through the Global Positioning System without dependence on foreign positioning, navigation, and timing services;
· Provide on a continuous, worldwide basis civil space-based positioning, navigation, and timing services free of direct user fees for civil, commercial, and scientific uses and for homeland security through the Global Positioning System and its augmentations. Provide open, free access to information necessary to develop and build equipment to use these services;
· Improve capabilities to deny hostile use of any space-based positioning, navigation, and timing services without unduly disrupting civil and commercial access to civil positioning, navigation, and timing services outside an area of military operations or for homeland security purposes;
· Improve the performance of space-based positioning, navigation, and timing services including more robust resistance to interference for, and consistent with, U.S. and allied national security purposes, homeland security, and civil, commercial, and scientific users worldwide;
· Maintain the Global Positioning System as a component of multiple sectors of the U.S. Critical Infrastructure consistent with Homeland Security Presidential Directive-7, Critical Infrastructure Identification, Prioritization, and Protection, dated December 17, 2003;
· Encourage foreign development of positioning, navigation, and timing services and systems based on the Global Positioning System. Seek to ensure that foreign space-based positioning, navigation, and timing systems are interoperable with the civil services of the Global Positioning System and its augmentations in order to benefit civil, commercial, and scientific users worldwide. At a minimum, seek to ensure foreign systems are compatible with the Global Positioning System and its augmentations and address mutual security concerns with foreign providers to prevent hostile use of space-based positioning, navigation, and timing services; and
· Promote the use of U.S. space-based positioning, navigation, and timing services and capabilities for applications at the Federal, State, and local level, to the maximum practical extent.
1.3. Requirements. The contractor shall perform technical analyses, planning, programming, budgeting, assessments, systems security current and future operations technical analysis and support, and assistance in solving problematic issues and concerns experienced by management, development and operations communities. In rendering the foregoing services, outputs may take the form of information, advice, opinions, alternatives, analyses, evaluations, recommendations, training and/or services to complement the Government’s technical expertise in accomplishing its mission. These services provide support, assistance, advice, or training for the efficient and effective management and operation of PNT organizations, activities, or systems. The required support for PNT shall fall into one of the following categories: Space Based Navigation Systems or Global Positioning System (GPS).
1.3.1. Space Based Navigation Systems Services
1.3.1.1. Overview. This requirement encompasses both operational capabilities for the Department of Defense (DoD) as well as civil applications for the Departments of Transportation (DoT), State (DoS), and Commerce (DoC) including their sub-agencies such as the FAA, NOAA, NASA, and NIST. As the primary focal point for the DoD and DoT, HQ AFSPC is charged to acquire/field GPS as “the premier worldwide space-based positioning/navigation/timing (PNT) system” per Presidential Decision Directive/National Security Policy Directive-39. Thus, this task supports the development of military and civil requirements through a structured Interagency Requirements Plan (IRP) process, analyses of competing accuracy and timing needs (both signals and security architectures), evaluation and recommendation counters to validated global/regional threats including the worldwide noise floor, and support for submission of the annual Program Objective Memorandum (POM).
This work requires technical analyses to identify the operational capabilities for fielding the next generation of GPS (i.e., GPS-III) which shall provide enhanced anti-jam capability, improved accuracy and timing, system integrity and net-centric interoperability. Furthermore, the on-going fielding of GPS Block II Modernization (i.e., GPS-IIR, IIR-M, and IIF) requires the same type of support.
The Operational Control Segment (OCS) includes the Architecture Evolution Program (AEP) as well as Launch Anomaly and Disposal Operations (LADO), while MUE addresses the utilization of both spectrally separate Military-code (M-Code), the Selective Availability and Anti-Spoofing Module (SAASM) utilizing P(Y) code, and Coarse Acquisition code (C/A code). Protection of Navigation (PRONAV) is also part of the MUE task along with advisory actions to the four military services for antenna electronics (AE) and PNT post-processing.
The GPS contribution to DoD’s Navigation Warfare (NAVWAR) goals must remain synchronized in order to deploy a robust, complementary operational NAVWAR architecture. The benefits of a defined GPS Operational Architecture (OA) stand to support NAVWAR tenets as various other terrestrial and airborne programs are fielded in the coming decades.
The evolution of various threats require constant evaluation to ensure future GPS signals, services and augmentations have the robust ability to operate-through a noise/jammed environment. Threat activity includes both analytical actions as well as monitoring the conduct of various tests in both the developmental and operational realms.
While GPS is an unclassified service to many users, the large majority of the above activity is often conducted in an officially controlled or classified environment. Classified actions are not only at the collateral level but also include Sensitive Compartmented Information (SCI) material and Special Access Program (SAP)/Special Access Required (SAR) items.
Other nations have recognized the critical role played by space-based PNT to not only their military forces but also the inherent transformational ability it provides their civil infrastructure such as banks, safety-of-life systems, cell phone networks, personnel tracking, and surveying. As a result, competing systems such as the European Union/European Space Agency’s Galileo program, the Russian GLONASS, China’s BEIDOU system, and Japan’s QZSS must be constantly assessed to ensure GPS remains the world standard as directed by National Security Policy Directive (NSPD) signed by the President.
1.3.1.2. Specific Requirements.
1.3.1.2.1. The Contractor shall prepare drafts of requirements documentation using established methodology and guidelines contained in DoD, Joint Chiefs of Staff, and AF instructions. The Contractor shall provide analyses of Mission Need Statement (MNS), Operational Requirements Document (ORD), Concept of Operations (CONOPS), senior leadership intent, Service and Joint requirements council memos, and/or previous studies to develop key performance parameters. The Contractor shall assist in establishing working groups and processes which lead to validation of requirement sets as directed by the various overarching instructions. The Contractor shall maintain a comment resolution process to address and resolve military and civil concerns generated during the requirements development process.
1.3.1.2.2. Using the program acquisition methodology identified in the various DoD, Joint Chiefs of Staff, and AF instructions, the Contractor shall evaluate and advise AFSPC/DRNN on acquisition and fielding progress to deliver operational warfighter capability and civil services. This shall include evaluation of acquisition strategy, program schedules, funding profiles and integrated system synchronization for the various satellite versions, ground control segment upgrades, and user equipment fielding. The Contractor shall participate in configuration control processes, test and evaluation planning, and specification development for the areas identified.
1.3.1.2.3. The Contractor shall analyze, develop, and document a draft Operational Architecture (OA) for the various GPS satellite versions, ground control segment upgrades, and user equipment fielding. Both Mission-level CONOPS as well as System CONOPS shall form the basis for the OA.
1.3.1.2.4. The Contractor shall evaluate emerging threats to space-based PNT and its’ augmentations to determine appropriate inputs for the requirements development process. This shall include both analytical studies as well as monitoring developmental and operational tests conducted by various DOD/Joint/Service organizations.
1.3.1.2.5. The Contractor shall evaluate the DoD NAVWAR planning and programming activities identified by HHQ and warfighter organizations to ensure space-based PNT acquisition and fielding is mutually supportive or complementary to those actions. This shall include the utility/effectiveness and cost benefit of various alternatives as well as the operational concepts/controls required for capability fielding.
1.3.1.2.6. The Contractor shall provide a monthly report of planned versus actual expenditures. Expected shortfalls and/or overruns will be identified at the earliest possible time. The Monthly Status Report shall contain a narrative description of the work accomplished during the previous month. The report shall contain a listing of any significant accomplishments and/or problems. In addition, the Monthly Status Report shall list the cumulative labor hour/category and associated funding remaining on the contract as well as the funds expended during the respective period of performance by labor hour/category. The Monthly status reports are due no later than the 15th day following the month of reporting. (CDRL – 0030A)
1.3.1.2.7. Contractor shall provide a semi-annual program review for actions in-process under this contract. The Quality Assurance Evaluator (QAE) will identify topics, format, and dates a minimum of 14 days in advance. (CDRL-0030B)
1.3.1.3. Travel. Any travel required to fulfill the tasks in this PWS shall be performed with the prior approval of the QAE in accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 31. The Contractor shall be responsible for making travel arrangements for their personnel, including air travel, car rental, lodging and subsistence. Contractor employees may be required to travel to various locations within the continental United States (CONUS) and outside the continental United States (OCONUS) in performance of task orders. Estimated travel requirements are included below. All contractor travel shall be approved by the Government prior to departure. Any travel required shall be performed in accordance with FAR 31.205-46, Travel Costs.
1.3.1.3.1. Travel Estimates. The following is estimated annual travel:
| Location |
| Annual Trips |
| Length of Travel |
(does not include travel time)
| Los Angeles AFB, CA |
| 10 |
| 4 days |
| Wash DC / vicinity |
| 10 |
| 4 days |
| Wash DC / vicinity |
| 6 |
| 3 days |
Valley Forge, PA
Huntingdon Bch, CA
Various other CONUS locations
| 5 |
| 4 days |
| Wash DC / vicinity |
| 6 |
| 3 days |
| Various CONUS locations |
| 4 |
| 5 days |
1.3.1.3.2. Passports, Visas, Customs, and Travel. All contractor employees are subject to customs, processing procedures, laws, agreements, and duties of the country to which they are traveling and procedures, laws, and duties of the United States upon re-entry. The Government will supply the Contractor with letters of travel when necessary to travel by Military Airlift.
1.3.2. Global Positioning System (GPS)
1.3.2.1. Overview. The GPS is a space-based radionavigation and time transfer system. It is comprised of three major segments: space, control and user. GPS provides highly accurate Position, Velocity, and Time (PVT) data to an unlimited number of properly equipped users anywhere on the ground, at sea, in the air, and in space. In addition, GPS supports the United States Nuclear Detonation (NUDET) Detection System (USNDS) mission by providing worldwide, near real-time nuclear detection data to the various national customers.
1.3.2.2. Specific Requirements.
1.3.2.2.1. System Security, Current and Future Operations Support.
1.3.2.2.1.1. The contractor shall review and update GPS related documents a minimum of once per year and make recommendations to A3FS to ensure accuracy, currency, compliance with HHQ guidance and potential impacts to program. Documents include the GPS III Enabling Concept (S), GPS Operating Concept (U/FOUO) with Navwar Appendix (S/NF), GPS Security Classification/Declassification Guide (U/FOUO) with Classified Appendices (S), GPS Precise Positioning Service Performance Standard, GPS Standard Positioning Service Performance Specification, GPS Functional Area Review, GPS Space and Ground Segment Operational Requirements Documents, GPS III and Next Generation Control Segment (OCX) Capability Development Documents.
1.3.2.2.1.2. The contractor shall draft Test Plans, Memorandum Of Agreements (MOAs) and support agreements with Major Commands, Combatant Commands, and defense and civil agencies. The contractor shall assist A3FS in determining the needs, changes and corrections in current and future GPS space and control segment evolution to include: Legacy command and control (C2), Architectural Evolution Program (AEP), and Next Generation Control Segment (OCX), war-fighting enhancements including Zero Age Of Data, GPS Information System, GPSOC/GNOC and Navwar issues, policies, and concerns, and implementation of additional navigation signals for civilian (L2C, L5, L1C) and military users (L1M, L2M).
1.3.2.2.1.3. The contractor shall assist the government in maintaining continuous interface and trusted relationships with higher, adjacent and subordinate organizations, staffs, Department of Defense (DoD) and civil agencies, and defense contractors to provide technical support for AFSPC . The Contractor shall provide technical support for liaison between: USSTRATCOM, JFCC SPACE, 14 AF, 50 SW, 2 SOPS, SMC/GPSW, the Air Staff, US Department of Transportation, Department of Homeland Security, US Coast Guard, other Services , and liaison with the intelligence community and civil agencies.
1.3.2.2.1.4. The contractor shall provide direct support to A3, the Original Classification Authority (OCA), through A3F and A3FS in answering questions on GPS and USNDS classification and resolving classified message incidents (CMIs).
1.3.2.2.1.5. The contractor shall provide recommendations on a daily basis, to A3FS on the accuracy, currency, compliance with HHQ guidance, and potential impact of changes to supporting program management documents to include: current and future GPS Space and Ground Segment interim Initial Capabilities Document (iICD), Initial Capabilities Document (ICD), Capstone Requirements Documents (CRD), Mission Area Assessments (MAA), Mission Area Plans (MAP), USAF Space Strategic Master Plan (SMP), National Security Space Architect (NSSA) policies, architectures, and guidance, Congressional language, OSD policy documents, SMC/GPSW budget documentation, OSD Program Budget Decisions and Program Decision Memorandums.
1.3.2.2.6. The contractor shall attend and coordinate approximately four meetings per month to include GPS III, AEP and OCX Integrated Product Team (IPT) meetings, design reviews, program reviews, and also attend and coordinate System Security Working Groups, Program Protection Working Groups, Threat Steering Groups, and Technical Interchange Meetings to represent A3FS as the advocate for the approved A3FS position.
1.3.2.2.7. The contractor shall review and recommend GPS on-orbit constellation sustainment, launch support requirements (to include scheduling and costing of current and projected launch requirements), control segment sustainment C2 test support requirements (to include scheduling and costing), equipment maintenance (to include assisting with prioritizing and funding) and sustainment strategies to assist A3FS in supporting GPS operations and program management. On a daily basis, tasks include: reviewing documents; developing and presenting informal briefings; attending briefings; attending meetings; and drafting papers and presentations. Government estimate is six products per week.
1.3.2.2.8. The contractor shall attend GPS operations conferences, Integrated Planning Team (IPT) meetings, working groups, design reviews, and program reviews to assist A3FS in supporting GPS operations and program management. Government estimate is five meetings per month. The contractor shall provide a quick look report to A3FS (CDRL 0009 ).
1.3.2.2. Program Element Monitor (PEM) Support.
1.3.2.2.1. Contractor shall support the A3FS PEM throughout the current year execution , budget year planning, and the PPBE cycle for POM generation and future programming outside the Future Year Defense Program (FYDP). This effort includes aspects of GPS planning and budgeting efforts, to include processing with Automated Business Services System (ABSS), Resource Allocation Programming Information Decision System (RAPIDS) and Commander Resource Information System (CRIS), Micro-based Budget Automated System (MicroBAS) and Financial Management Tools.
1.3.2.2.2. The Contractor shall assist A3FS in advocating for GPS funding by developing comprehensive “bottom-up” briefings on recommended AFSPC positions on the GPS Program Objective Memorandum (POM) and Amended POM (APOM) with resource adjustments for GPS Program Element Codes. Government estimate is three per month. (CDRL 0008)
1.3.2.2.3. The Contractor shall assist A3FS in supporting GPS operations and program management through execution plan development, actual funds execution, analysis of new program initiatives, GPS upgrade and modification plans, and resource allocation actions.
1.3.2.2.4. The contractor shall recommend resource adjustments to MAJCOM monthly and OSD mid-year execution reviews. The contractor shall recommend resource adjustments to Presidents Budget (PB) planning and execution, to include any amendments to enable A3FS to determine impact of changes to the GPS program.
1.3.2.2.5. The contractor shall provide operations impacts to budget cuts and marks by Congress, the Program Executive Office (PEO), Air Force Programs and Plans (AF/A8) Space Panel, and Air Force Space Command Programs and Plans (AFSPC/A8/9) to enable A3FS to determine impact of changes to the GPS program.
1.3.2.2.6. The contractor shall provide program and budget analysis support to A3FS with continuous situational awareness of operations requirements and budget decisions at 50 Space Wing, SMC/GPSW, AFSPC, Air Staff, Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD), and Congress. The contractor shall draft a program strategy for A3FS to use as the framework for all GPS resource decisions.
1.3.2.2.7. The contractor shall analyze OSD Program Budget Decisions (PBD) and Program Decision Memorandums (PDM), Congressional marks, and resource actions that affect GPS operational capabilities and provide recommended statements of operational impact to AFSPC/A3F.
1.3.2.2.8. In coordination with stakeholders, the contractor shall provide updates via directed media on PBDs, PDMs, congressional marks, and other budgetary and programmatic exercises to ensure most favorable outcome for the GPS program (CDRL 0008). Ensure coordination of all issues, budgetary and technical, with appropriate military, intelligence, and civil agencies.
1.3.2.2.9. The contractor shall review revisions to GPS Status of Resources & Training System (SORTS) reports and to GPS Designed Operational Capabilities (DOC) statements and associated Systems Capability (SYSCAP) system declaration and determination guidance to ensure compliance with AF directives. The contractor will review approximately three reports per month, coordinate SORTS, DOC statements and SYSCAP with A3FS, and draft and present approved SORTS briefings to AFSPC senior leaders.
1.3.2.3. Travel. Contractor employees may be required to travel to various locations within the continental United States (CONUS) and outside the continental United States (OCONUS) in performance of task orders. Estimated travel requirements are included below. All contractor travel shall be approved by the Government prior to departure. Any travel required shall be performed in accordance with FAR 31.205-46, Travel Costs.
1.3.2.3.1. The following trips is estimated annual travel (does not include travel days).
| Location |
| Annual Trips |
| Length of Travel |
(does not include travel time)
| Washington, D.C. |
| 8 |
| 3 days |
| Los Angeles, CA |
| 12 |
| 3 days |
| Omaha, NE |
| 4 |
| 3 days |
| Albuquerque, NM |
| 2 |
| 3 days |
| Vandenberg AFB, CA |
| 4 |
| 3 days |
1.3.2.3.2. Passports, Visas, Customs, and Travel. All contractor employees are subject to customs, processing procedures, laws, agreements, and duties of the country to which they are traveling and procedures, laws, and duties of the United States upon re-entry. The Government will supply the Contractor with letters of travel when necessary to travel by Military Airlift.
1.4. Quality Control Plan. Establish a process (quality program) to provide an accurate assessment of performance in all areas of the contract. Implement a quality program through the Contractor’s Quality Control Plan (QCP).
1.4.1. The QA personnel assigned to maintain the QA program shall perform independently of Contractor task order personnel to include the following:
1.4.1.1. Have sufficient well-defined responsibility, authority, and the organizational freedom to identify and evaluate quality problems in order to initiate, recommend, and/or provide solutions.
1.4.1.2. Maintain adequate records of any audits, inspections, and tests to support the conformance to the requirements and effective operation of the quality program.
1.4.1.3. Ensure timely and effective corrective action is obtained for all deficiencies identified by the Contractor or by the Government. All deficiency responses shall include the cause of the deficiency to preclude recurrence and an analysis of the quality program’s effectiveness in the area of the deficiency.
1.4.2.
The Contractor shall be responsible for overall responsiveness, cost control, adherence to schedules, technical quality of work, management of contractor’s team efforts and commitment to customer satisfaction.
2.0. SERVICES SUMMARY
The Service Delivery Summary (SDS) is a list of Performance Objectives and Performance Thresholds that will be regularly verified by Government personnel. Each Performance Objective represents a significant task as identified in the PWS by the Government at the time of contract award. The Performance Threshold represents the minimum acceptable level of performance. The Performance Objectives and Performance Thresholds represent only the significant tasks of this contract and do not excuse the Contractor from performance of other responsibilities identified in this PWS. Performance Objectives will be monitored regularly by Government Quality Assurance Evaluators (QAEs). Performance objectives may be added at the basic contract and/or task order level and performance thresholds may be raised or lowered during the course of this contract.
2.1. Findings. A finding is any government-identified noncompliance with contract requirements that specifies that an activity or action did not take place, or did not take place to the standards of timeliness or quality required. A Finding is categorized as either a Major or Minor Finding. Findings will be documented on a Corrective Action Report (CAR) and provided to the Contractor for their response. While the Contractor will be given the opportunity for reperformance when possible, the deficiency will nevertheless be documented.
2.2. Performance Objectives.
| PEFORMANCE OBJECTIVE |
| PWS PARAGRAPH |
| PERFORMANCE THRESHOLD |
| (SDS-1) Provide accurate technical and analytical advice, guidance and products as required by individual task orders. |
| 1.3.1.1., 1.3.1.2., 1.3.1.3., 1.3.2.1., and 1.3.2.2. |
| Contractor receives no more than one formal customer complaints/contract discrepancy reports per year for each task order. Contractor successfully resolves any customer complaint within 10 working days of receipt or less time as specified in the task order. |
| (SDS-2) Provide timely response to time-sensitive requirements, including short notice requirements and a large number of requirements in a short period (surge capability). |
| 1.3.1.1., 1.3.1.2., 1.3.1.3., 1.3.2.1., and 1.3.2.2. |
| Contractor receives no more than one formal customer complaint/contract discrepancy report per year from all task orders. |
| (SDS-3) Compliance with DD 254, Contract Security Classification Specification, to include proper handling, storage, transmission, and destruction of classified materials. |
| 1.3.1.1., 1.3.1.2., 1.3.1.3., 1.3.2.1., and 1.3.2.2. |
| No security violations. |
| (SDS-4) Requirements/deliverables completed in an accurate, timely manner in compliance with individual task order requirements. |
| 1.3.1.1., 1.3.1.2., 1.3.1.3., 1.3.2.1., and 1.3.2.2. |
| No more than three late documents per year per task order and no more than 2 working days late. No more than two sets of corrections/edits and all corrections must be accomplished within two working days, or other such time periods as established in the task order. |
4.0.
GENERAL INFORMATION
4.1. Supervision of Employees
The Government shall not supervise or otherwise direct contractor employees. The Contractor shall not supervise or otherwise direct government employees, nor shall the Contractor supervise employees of other contractors outside the Contractors’ own subcontracting/teaming arrangements.
4.2. Contractor Identification
All N2A2S contractor personnel shall be required to wear company identification badges so as to distinguish themselves from government employees. These badges must be visible at all times when working with government personnel. When conversing with government personnel during business meetings, over the telephone or via electronic mail, support contractor personnel shall identify themselves as such to avoid any perception that they may be government employees and to avoid situations arising where sensitive topics might be better discussed solely between government employees. Electronic mail signature blocks shall identify contractor/company affiliation. Documents or reports produced by contractors shall be suitably marked as contractor products or contractor participation appropriately disclosed. Contractor personnel occupying collocated space in a government facility shall identify their workspace area with their name and company/contractor affiliation.
4.3. Contractor /Government Communication
4.3.1 The Contractor shall provide program management. The Contractor’s Program Manager shall provide clear and consistent written and verbal response ( e.g. return phone call, email or other communication) to the Government within 12 business hours.
4.3.2 The Contractor’s Program Manager shall meet at least semi-annually with the contract’s multi-functional government team and at least quarterly with the contract’s government QAE and Contracting Officer. Multi-functional team meetings shall be coordinated and hosted by the Contractor. Quarterly meetings shall be held at government facilities. The Contractor shall provide minutes of the previous meeting at the next scheduled meeting for both multi-functional and quarterly meetings.
4.4. Product Ownership. All products produced by the Contractor in the performance of this SOW are the property of the government.
4.5. Proprietary Data. The Contractor shall request government approval prior to the use of any proprietary data or software tools to fulfill the requirements of this PWS.
4.6.
Place of Performance
AFSPC/A3FS will furnish up to two workspaces in the Hartinger building on Peterson AFB, to include desk space, chairs, computers connected to 21 NET, Secret Internet Protocol Router network (SIPRNET) access, use of telephones, copier, fax machines and additional media storage. Any other contractor personnel shall work at contractor facilities.
4.7.
Duty Hours
When working on government sites, the government’s normal duty hours are 0730-1630, Monday through Friday, unless otherwise specified in individual task orders. Circumstances may require the Contractor to provide services after normal duty hours.
4.8.
Legal Holidays
The Federal Government observes the following holidays:
New Year's Day
Martin Luther King's Birthday
President's Day
Memorial Day
Independence Day
Labor Day
Columbus Day
Veteran's Day
Thanksgiving Day
Christmas Day
4.9. Security Requirements.
4.9.1.
All contractor personnel shall hold a SECRET clearance or higher. Some task orders may require security classifications up to and including TOP SECRET SCI. Additionally, contractor personnel shall possess appropriate security clearances as prescribed in individual task orders as of the task order start date. For positions requiring additional SCI clearance, contractors shall provide cleared individuals eligible for SCI at task order start. The Contractor will be given access to applicable documentation to include requirements, plans, specifications, studies, and analyses up to and including TOP SECRET SCI classification as required by individual task orders. The Contractor shall maintain accountability records/receipts for classified material to include transfer and destruction of material.
4.9.2. Industrial Security. A Contract Security Classification Specification, DD Form 254, is issued as part of the contract and is directive upon the Contractor. The DD 254 includes program-specific classification guides (SCG) as required.
Position, Navigation and Timing (PNT) Mission Capability Services
Performance Work Statement
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .