Attachment_No__4_-_Relevant_Past_and_Present_Performance_Questionnaire.docx

U.S. Department of the Interior Solicitation No. 140D0422R0077 – Environmental Services Contract Relevant Past and Present Performance Questionnaire When completed, this document is Source Selection Sensitive in accordance with FAR 3.104

Please return this completed questionnaire to juan_rendon@ibc.doi.gov

Section 1: Contract Identification

Section 2: Customer or Agency Identification

Section 3: Evaluation Ratings

Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided for each question. The rating scale is defined as follows:

Section 4: Evaluation Factors

Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided for each question. The rating scale is defined in the above section.

a. Ability to understand, comply and meet customer objectives and technical requirements.

b. Compliance with contract delivery schedules and quality of technical data/report submittals.

c. Effectiveness of assigned personnel in terms of the appropriate mix of education and experience to accomplish the requirement.

d. Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements (without adverse effect on performance)

e. Contractor proposed alternative methods/processes that improved the product or service which benefited the customer.

f. Quality/effectiveness of sub-contracted efforts.

g. Provide an overall rating for the work performed by this contractor.

a. Effectiveness of overall contract management involving multiple projects with multiple disciplines (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program).

b. Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance.

c. Ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or surge situations (including notifying COR, PM or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent contractual issues).

d. Effectiveness of material management (including Government Furnished Property or Material).

e. Contractor implemented, responsive/flexible processes to improve quality and timeliness of support.

f. Ability to assimilate and incorporate changes in requirements and/or priority, including planning, execution and response to Government changes.

g. Effectiveness of on-site management, including management of subcontractors, suppliers, materials, and labor force?

h. To what extent was the contractor able to maintain an environment of safety, adhere to its approved safety plan, and respond to safety issues? (Includes: following the users rules, regulations, and requirements regarding housekeeping, safety, correction of noted deficiencies, etc.)

i. Contractor complied with all security requirements for the project and personnel security requirements.

a. Ability to smoothly transition resources and personnel.

b. Ability to maintain continuity while transitioning/phasing in resources and personnel to support other efforts.

c. Ability to hire/apply a qualified workforce to this effort.

d. Ability to retain a qualified workforce on this effort.

e. Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes; responsiveness to administrative reports, businesslike and communication)

a. Accuracy in forecasting contract costs.

b. Ability to meet forecasted costs and perform within contract costs.

c. Ability to alert Government of unforeseen costs before they occur.

d. If this is/was a Government cost type contract, please rate the Contractor’s timeliness and accuracy in submitting monthly invoices with appropriate back-up documentation, monthly status reports/budget variance reports, compliance with established budgets and avoidance of significant and/or unexplained variances (under runs or overruns)

e. Is the Contractor’s accounting system adequate for management and tracking of costs? If no, please explain in Remarks section.

f. Contractor proposed alternative methods/processes that reduced cost of product or service which benefited the customer.

a. Is the Contractor’s accounting system adequate for management and tracking of costs? If no, please explain in Remarks section.

b. If this is/was a Government contract, has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations? Indicate if show cause or cure notices were issued, or any default action in comment section below.

c. Have there been any indications that the contractor has had any financial problems? If yes, please explain below.

d. Would you hire or work with this firm again? (If no, please explain below)

Section 5: Narrative Summary

1. What were the contractor’s greatest strengths in the performance of the contract?

Click here to enter text.

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!

Please return this completed questionnaire to Juan Rendon at juan_rendon@ibc.doi.gov, Source Selection Information – FAR 2.101 and 3.104