Attachment 7 PPQ 20210419.pdf

Initials

ATTACHMENT 7

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

INSTRUCTION PAGE

Please complete the following questionnaire concerning evaluation of the Contractor’s past performance. Your response to this evaluation will be utilized for the procurement of a construction firm to provide all supervision, labor, materials and equipment necessary under a Mini-Multiple Award Construction Contract, Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (ID/IQ) contract vehicle for construction services located primarily at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson

(JBER) AFB, AK.

Increased emphasis in our procurements is placed on past performance as a source selection factor. Your complete response is critical as this will be relied on by the Government in the selection of a firm for the proposed construction project. Please answer all questions by checking only one (1) response per question. It is strongly requested that additional information is placed in the space provided.

You will be required to sign this evaluation at the end of the questionnaire and your initials are required on each page of this questionnaire, as well as on this instruction page.

Government personnel may contact you concerning responses made by you in this questionnaire.

If you have any questions and/or concerns, please send them to john.jeffrey.1@us.af.mil and donald.dougherty.1@us.af.mil.

NOTICE: WHEN COMPLETED, THIS QUESTIONNAIRE WILL BE CONSIDERED

SENSITIVE AND SHALL NOT BE RELEASED TO THE OFFEROR.

The completed Present/Past Performance Questionnaire(s), applicable Consent Letter(s), and Client Authorization Letter(s) shall be emailed to: john.jeffrey.1@us.af.mil and donald.dougherty.1@us.af.mil or mailed to the address listed below. If mailing (USPS, FedEx, UPS, etc.), the outside envelope must be marked as follows:

NOTE: TO BE OPENED BY ADDRESSEE ONLY

673d Contracting Office/PKA Attn: Mr. John Jeffrey, Contracting Officer 10480 Sijan Ave

JBER AFB, AK 99506

Note: Electronic submission is preferred.

Contractor being evaluated:

Owner Name (Organization Name, Evaluator Name, Address, Zip, and Telephone Number)

Name, Location, and Description of Project - Use additional sheets if necessary.

Award Amount:

Original: $

Final: $

Percentage of Final Contract Amount resulting from owner initiated changes:

Status of project: Active 100% complete

If active, expected completion date:

If complete, completion date:

Would you award a contract to this firm again for similar work? Yes No

Trades required to complete the project work, please place an “X”:

Demolition Painting

Carpentry

Mechanical / HVAC/Plumbing

Fire Sprinkler/Fire Alarm Systems

Electrical

Structural

Minimal Design Hazmat/Asbestos/Abatement

Roofing/Insulation/Thermal & Moisture Control

Civil work

For each of the questions appearing on the attached sheets, please place an “X” next to the statement which best represents your evaluation in response to the subject questions. Please note any comments which will add value to your marked response.

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

A: Quality Processes

1. How well has the contractor complied with contract requirements?

Contractor consistently surpassed contract requirements.

Contractor exceeded contract requirements.

Contractor met the minimum requirements.

Contractor did not meet the minimum requirements.

Comments:

2. Was the contractor responsive in completing punch list items?

Contractor completed punch list items after initial notification.

Contractor completed most punch list items after initial notification.

Contractor eventually completed all punch list items.

Some punch list items were never completed by contractor.

3. Did the contractor have a program to monitor quality?

Contractor has an established, comprehensive program with individuals employed specifically for quality control.

Contractor set up a satisfactory quality control program to comply with the requirements for your project.

Contractor’s quality control program was ineffective on your project.

4. Did the contractor meet the quality of work on the project?

Contractor exceeded the quality expectations.

Contractor met quality expectations.

Contractor performed marginal quality of work.

Contractor performed poor quality of work.

B: Cost Control

1. Did the contractor submit reasonably priced change proposals?

Contractor consistently submitted fair & reasonably priced change proposals.

Contractor typically submitted fair & reasonably priced change proposals.

Contractor submitted fair & reasonably priced proposals some of the time.

Contractor rarely submitted fair & reasonably priced change proposals.

C: Schedule and Timeliness Performance

1. Did the contractor complete the project on schedule?

Contractor completed project prior to originally scheduled completion date Contractor completed project by original scheduled completion date Contractor completed within agreed to extended completion date Contractor failed to meet project completion date.

2. How responsive was the contractor in addressing unforeseen/unanticipated conditions?

Contractor consistently exercised a pro-active approach.

Contractor demonstrated some initiative in exercising a pro-active approach.

Contractor rarely demonstrated a pro-active approach.

Contractor never demonstrated a pro-active approach.

3. Were the contractor submittals delivered on time?

Contractor consistently made submissions ahead of schedule.

Contractor made some submissions ahead of schedule and all others on time.

Contractor made majority of submissions on time.

Contractor submissions were usually behind schedule.

D: Effectiveness of Management

1. How well did the contractor maintain a good relationship with the owner and the owner’s technical advisors/representatives?

Contractor was extremely cooperative.

Contractor was very cooperative.

Contractor was generally cooperative.

Contractor was not cooperative.

2. How effective was the contractor's on site management team?

Contractor's team was extremely effective.

Contractor's team was very effective.

Contractor's team was generally effective.

Contractor's team was ineffective.

3. Did the contractor maintain a consistent project team throughout the duration of the project?

No adjustments were made to the project team throughout the project.

Minor adjustments were made to the project team during the project.

Significant changes to the project team were made during the project.

Contractor maintained no consistency in key personnel during the project.

4. Did the contractor adequately staff the project?

Contractor’s staff was extremely effective.

Contractor’s staff was very effective.

Contractor’s staff was generally effective.

Contractor’s staff was ineffective.

C: Regulatory Compliance

1. Did the contractor comply with all Federal, State, and local environmental regulations?

Contractor consistently complied with all regulations Contractor mostly complied with all regulations Contractor sometimes complied with all regulations Contractor consistently did not comply with all regulations

2. Did the contractor responsibly dispose of all Contractor generated hazardous waste?

Contractor consistently disposed of all generated hazardous waste Contractor mostly disposed of all generated hazardous waste Contractor did not dispose of generated hazardous waste Contractor was not responsible for disposing of hazardous waste

3. Did the contractor carry a satisfactory safety plan for your project?

Contractor set up a satisfactory safety plan specific to the requirements Contractor adapted a generic safety plan that meets project needs.

Contractor has a generic safety plan which he uses on every project; no adaptations.

Contractor’s safety plan was ineffective for my project.

Signature and Date:

Name and Title:

Organization: