Attachment 6 - Past Performance.pdf

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE

Person completing questionnaire: Phone No.:

Firm’s name: Date:

Email address:

* Contractor:

1. This new contract is for:

Has this contractor performed any of these services for you? If yes, which ones and when was work completed?

Ratings Definitions:

Exceptional: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s/owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Very Good: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s/owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Satisfactory: Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Marginal: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

Unsatisfactory: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

jpaul Typewritten Text Consolidate office space into the owned Petersburg District Office (PDO) building (Petersburg, Alaska). Major interior renovation of the PDO to remediate hazardous materials; remove all building systems and components excluding the building shell; provide new structural support; provide all new building components, layout, systems, fixtures and finishes. Minor modifications to the exterior of the PDO including new windows, doors, entry soffit, roof modifications for new HVAC systems; other related work to provide a fully functional modern office building. Partial renovation of the Harris Building to convert office areas to storage, replace columns, reclaim an overhead door, convert a storage room to a vehicle garage, and minor exterior improvements. Excavate and fill at the Fram Compound to expand a driveway and add approximately six parking spaces. Additionally, the PDO has been determined eligible for the National Register of Historic Places.

2. Timeliness of Performance/Schedule Rating (see ratings definitions on Page 1)

☐Exceptional ☐Very Good

☐Satisfactory ☐Marginal

☐Unsatisfactory

Please provide rationale for above rating, e.g., did the contractor meet the contract schedule, were they reliable and responsive to technical direction; were any liquidated damages assessed?

3. Management Rating (see ratings definitions on Page 1)

☐Satisfactory ☐Marginal

☐Unsatisfactory

Please provide rationale for above rating, e.g., how effective was the contractor’s management, did they maintain a good working relationship with the Government/project owner, did they demonstrate cooperative behavior, recommend effective solutions to problems, and show businesslike concern for Government/project owner’s interests?

4. Quality Rating (see ratings definitions on Page 1)

☐Satisfactory ☐Marginal

☐Unsatisfactory

Please provide rationale for above rating, e.g., was a quality product provided; to what extent did the contractor conform to good standards of workmanship; was deficient work identified and corrected, were any unspecified materials incorporated into the project?

5. Overall, to what extent were you satisfied with the contractor’s completed services?

☐Extremely satisfied ☐Generally satisfied

☐Generally dissatisfied ☐Extremely dissatisfied

Additional comments:

6. Given what I know today about the contractor’s ability to perform in accordance with a contract’s most significant requirements, I ________________ recommend them for similar requirements in the future.

☐WOULD ☐WOULD NOT