Attachment 6 L-2 Past and Present Performance Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 716 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Facility Exhaust System
- Solicitation number
- FA910125RB001
About this file
This document is a Past/Present Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) for the Facility Exhaust System contract (Solicitation Number FA910125RB001). The questionnaire is designed to evaluate a contractor's performance across six key technical factors: design-build capability, quality, timeliness, responsiveness, management and subcontracts, and change/cost control. The evaluation uses a color-coded rating system ranging from Blue/Exceptional (highest) to Red/Unsatisfactory (lowest), with the option to mark certain areas as Not Applicable.
The form requires detailed input from previous contract administrators, including sections for contract identification, respondent contact information, narrative summaries of contractor strengths and weaknesses, and specific yes/no questions about contract terminations or cure notices. The document is part of a broader solicitation for an Air Force Test Center project at Arnold Air Force Base, seeking a firm-fixed-price contract for designing, procuring, and installing a new exhaust system, with proposals due by 2:00 p.m. Central Time on 16 May 2025 and 2 June 2025 for different submission volumes.
View the file
Other files
Show all 28
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Facility Exhaust System
FA9101-25-R-B001
Attachment 6, L-2
ATTACHMENT L-2
PAST/PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)
WHEN FILLED IN THIS DOCUMENT IS SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION IAW FAR 2.101 & 3.104
I. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION : Please correct any information below known to be inaccurate:
A. Contractor (Company/Division): ___________________________________________________________
B. Point of Contact (Program Manager and Contracting Officer): ____________________________________
C. Telephone Number: ______________________________________________________________________
D. Cage Code: _____________________________________________________________________________
E. Contract Number: ________________________________________________________________________
F. Dollar Amount: __________________________________________________________________________
G. Contract Type (e.g., FFP, FPIF, CPIF, CPFF, CPAF): ___________________________________________
H. Contract Period of Performance: ____________________________________________________________
I. Program Title: ___________________________________________________________________________
J. Brief Program Description: _________________________________________________________________
K. Program Phase: (e.g., Engineering & Manufacturing Development (EMD)): __________________________
L. Contractor Performed as the Prime Contractor Joint Venture Partner Subcontractor
(If Joint Venture Partner, specifically identify the managing partner and other partners; if Subcontractor, identify Prime Contractor. If not Prime, state the specific role in executing the work).
Attachment 6, L-2
II. RESPONDENT(S) TO QUESTIONNAIRE
A. Name(s): ______________________________________________________________________________
B. Address: ________________________________________________________________________________
C. Phone Number(s): _______________________________________________________________________
D. Fax Number: ___________________________________________________________________________
E. Email Address: _________________________________________________________________________
F. Position (e.g., Program Manager, PCO/ACO): __________________________________________________
G. Other suggested points of contact: ___________________________________________________________
III. GENERAL COMMENTS _______________________________________________________________
IV. PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Please indicate your performance rating for the contractor by circling or place an “X” over the appropriate code using the performance evaluation scale below. Ratings are defined as follows:
CODE PERFORMANCE RATING
B BLUE/EXCEPTIONAL - During the contract period, contractor performance is meeting (or met) all contract requirements and consistently exceeding (or exceeded) many. Very few, if any, minor problems encountered. Contractor took immediate and effective corrective action.
P VERY GOOD - During the contract period, contractor is meeting (or met) all contract requirements and consistently exceeding (or exceeded) some. Some minor problems encountered. Contractor took timely corrective action
G GREEN/SATISFACTORY - During the contract period, contractor performance is meeting (or met) all contract requirements. For any problems encountered, contractor took effective corrective action.
Y YELLOW/MARGINAL - During the contract period, contractor performance is not meeting (or did not meet) some contract requirements. For problems encountered, corrective action appeared only marginally effective, not effective, or not fully implemented. Customer involvement was required.
R RED/UNSATISFACTORY - During the contract period, contractor performance is failing (or failed) to meet most contract requirements. Serious problems encountered.
Corrective actions were either ineffective or non-existent. Extensive Customer oversight and involvement was required.
N/A NOT APPLICABLE - Unable to provide a rating. Contract did not include performance for this
Attachment 6, L-2 aspect. Do not know.
Respondents should explain their rating in the remarks section for any rating of Blue, Yellow, or Red, and ratings that might contradict official Past Performance documentation (e.g., Contractor Performance
Assessment Reports (CPARs)). If more space is needed, remarks may be continued on separate pages.
Please identify question number.
Attachment 6, L-2
TECHNICAL FACTOR- Rate the contractor's performance for the following:
1. DESIGN-BUILD CAPABILITY B P G Y R N/A
A) Quality/integrity of engineered design and technical data/report preparation efforts
B) Contractor maintained a consistent pace in completing design work
C) Design team assigned to the project was well qualified
D) Design work met the established standards of quality
E) Design work met operational requirements of the project
F) Contractor adequately identified risks and proposed risk mitigations
2. QUALITY B P G Y R N/A
A) Contractor provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements
B) Contractor provided well researched and clearly identified submittals that met contract requirements
C) Contractor completed all work with good workmanship and in conformance with the specifications
D) Contractor corrected deficiencies in a timely manner and pursuant to their quality control plan
3. TIMELINESS B P G Y R N/A
A) Contractor met established project schedules to complete the project on time
B) Contractor provided timely cost proposals
C) Contractor submitted the progress schedule and progress reports as required
D) Contractor provided on-time submittals as required
E) Contractor met critical milestones and accelerated work as necessary to minimize impact to operations
4. RESPONSIVENESS B P G Y R N/A
A) Contractor was reasonable and cooperated to resolve problems
B) Contractor acted promptly to resolve problems, ensuring compliance with contract requirements and safety regulations
Attachment 6, L-2
C) Contractor identified problems as they occurred, suggested approaches to the problems, and displayed initiative to solve problems
D) Contractor was able to respond to accelerations and/or compressions in schedule based on unforeseen changes in customer requirements.
D) Contractor attended meetings as needed and maintained communication with the Government
E) Contractor responded to warranty issues within the time frames specified in the contract
5. MANAGEMENTANDSUBCONTRACTS B P G Y R N/A
A) Contractor effectively managed and coordinated its work
B) Contractor cooperated with other members of the project team
C) Contractor hired, maintained and replaced as necessary, qualified personnel and subcontractors/suppliers
D) Contractor ensured on-site manager or site superintendent was consistently present on site when work was performed
E) Contractor ensured the on-site manager or site superintendent had sufficient authority to make decisions and take actions during project performance to keep the project on schedule
6. CHANGE/COST CONTROL B P G Y R N/A
A) Contractor responded to contract changes and provided accurate, reasonable, and supportable cost proposals
B) Contractor demonstrated the ability to control costs and/or modifications
C) Contractor validated subcontractor cost proposals prior to submission to the
Government
1. During execution of this project, did you encounter any design deficiencies or oversights? If so, were you satisfied with the contractor's resolution?
Attachment 6, L-2
2. Please provide the following information regarding cost/price:
(1) Original Contract Cost or Price $______________________
(2) Value of Negotiated Contract Changes $____________________
(3) Actual/Projected Cost to Complete $____________________
(4) Baseline Estimate at Completion $____________________
(5) Total Negotiated Changes EAC $____________________
(6) Cost Underrun/Overrun (-) $____________________
B. NARRATIVE SUMMARY
1. Please discuss each and every response for which you indicated Blue/Exceptional, Yellow/Marginal, or Red/Unsatisfactory) in response to the questions above (use additional sheets, if necessary).
2. What were the contractor’s greatest strengths in the performance of the contract?
3. What were the contractor’s greatest weaknesses in the performance of the contract?
C. GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS ONLY
1. Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract?
Attachment 6, L-2
Yes _____________ No______________
2. Was this contract partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?
Yes________ Default_______ Convenience________ Pending Termination________
No________
If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules)
D. GENERAL COMMENT (Choose one of the following and explain your choice in the remarks)
Given what I know today about the contractor’s ability to execute what it promised in its proposal, I definitely would probably would might or might not probably would not definitely would not award to the contractor today given that I had a choice.
REMARKS:
Evaluator’s Signature Date
Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!
Please email this completed questionnaire to: haley.smith.10@us.af.mil
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .