Attachment_0061_Tracked_Vehicle_Dynamics_Datasheet.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 66 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Optionally Manned Fighting Vehicle (OMFV) Draft Request for Proposal (RFP) W56HZV-22-R-0026
- Solicitation number
- W56HZV-22-R-0026
About this file
This document contains a draft request for proposal for the Optionally Manned Fighting Vehicle program. The Army is soliciting feedback on the draft RFP by May 2nd, 2022 for the detailed design, prototype build, and test phase. Respondents must submit any comments through a provided comment resolution matrix template. Unclassified feedback should be emailed to the program mailbox, while controlled unclassified information and classified information must be sent through appropriate channels as outlined. The draft RFP includes attachments on program specifications and architecture that are marked as controlled unclassified information or classified, and interested parties can request copies of these documents by providing the required information on their facility and any applicable agreements or certifications.
View the file
Other files
Show all 49
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Cover Page
| Attachment 0061 |
| Tracked Vehicle Dynamics Data Sheet |
| Solicitation No.: W56HZV-22-R-0026 |
| 29-Mar-2022 |
| Revision No.: 000 |
| Distribution Statement A: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. |
| SECURITY NOTICE: Contractor responses to the data requirements are likely to be at the Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) level, and may be at the SECRET level. For security related guidance and procedures on how to mark, handle, and transmit classified information, contractors should refer to DoD 5220.22-M National Industrial Security Program Operating Manual, 28 Feb 2006, supporting DD 254, and the OMFV Security Classification Guide (CUI) signed by PEO GCS on 18 February 2021. |
All CUI responses should be marked with the following CUI Designation Indicator and Distribution Statement:
Controlled by: the name of the Offeror company (not required if identified in the letterhead) Controlled by: identification of the office creating the document CUI Category(ies): CTI, EXPT Distribution Statement: D POC: name and phone number or email of POC
DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT D: Distribution authorized to the Department of Defense and U.S. DoD contractors; Specific Authority: DoDM 5200.01 and DoDM 5200.45, date of determination is: 18 February 2021. Other requests for this document shall be referred to the attention of the PM Maneuver Combat Systems (MCS) Security Manager at: Program Executive Office Ground Combat Systems (PEO GCS), ATTN: SFAE-GCS-C, 6501 East Eleven Mile Road, Detroit Arsenal, MI 48397-5000.
WARNING - This document contains technical data whose export is restricted by the Arms Export Control Act (Title 22, U.S.C., Sec 2751, et seq.) or the Export Administration Act of 1979 (Title 50, U.S.C., App. 2401 et seq.), as amended. Violations of these export laws are subject to severe criminal penalties. Disseminate in accordance with provisions of DoD Directive 5230.25.
SECRET responses should use the following Instructions:
This content is classified at the SECRET level and may contain elements of controlled unclassified information (CUI), unclassified, or information classified at a lower level than the overall classification displayed. This content shall not be used as a source of derivative classification; refer instead to OMFV Security Classification Guide, 20210218. It must be reviewed for both Classified National Security Information (CNSI) and CUI in accordance with DoDI5230.09 prior to public release, or PM Maneuver Combat Systems (MCS) Security Manager at: Program Executive Office Ground Combat Systems (PEO GCS), ATTN: SFAE-GCS-C, 6501 East Eleven Mile Road, Detroit Arsenal, MI 48397-5000.
Classified by: List name, position title of the Derivative classifier and office of origin Derived from: OMFV SCG, 20210218 Declassify on: YYYYMMDD (Refer to declassification column to determine the date)
Controlled by: the name of the Offeror company (not required if identified in the letterhead) Controlled by: identification of the office creating the document CUI Category(ies): CTI, EXPT Distribution Statement: D POC: name and phone number or email of POC
Revision Log
All data on this worksheet is subject to the contractor's disclosure statement(s) found on the "Contractor Coversheet"
Revision # Date Change Description
(add additional rows as necessary)
Narrative
VEHICLE DATA PACKAGE FOR DYNAMIC MODELING AND SIMULATION
1.0 INTRODUCTION
This package describes the parametric data requirements for high resolution vehicle dynamic analysis using methodologies such as Dynamic Analysis and Design System (DADS). The nature of these methodologies is such that detailed vehicle data are necessary to formulate the models for the simulation to be performed. In order to facilitate the development of dynamic models of modern military vehicle systems, an attempt has been made here to provide generic data sheets to define the system parameters necessary to conduct any desired simulations. These sheets include the minimal requirements necessary to conduct simulations. Special vehicle features or performance characteristics which are not covered by the data sheets need to be described and parameters provided in sufficient detail for high resolution dynamic simulations.
2.0 OBJECTIVES
The purpose of this package is to: 1) define in detail the parameters, drawings, and descriptions that are necessary to perform high resolution vehicle dynamic simulation and 2) provide standardized work sheets which will facilitate wheeled vehicle system description and model development.
3.0 RECOMMENDATIONS
It should be noted that the data defined in this package has a direct effect on the dynamic response of the vehicle. However the parameter values are generally quite difficult to determine. As the model can only be as accurate as the data provided, consideration should be given to collecting accurate and precise data to be used in the modeling process. When accurate data are used correctly in a vehicle dynamic simulation, accurate results can be produced and decisions can be made based on predicted vehicle performance.
As the government deems it necessary, this package will be updated to add data requirements as modeling methodologies and simulation technologies grow.
4.0 DATA SHEETS
In order to determine the dynamic response of military vehicles, parametric data that describes the main subsystems of the vehicle must be known. The following data sheets are included to capture that data:
1. Sprung vehicle data
2. Power train data
3. Tracked vehicle:
A. Track data B. Track Suspension data
Models will be developed from each subsystem's parametric data and the models will be combined to create the vehicle model. The level of detail used to describe each subsystem and the accuracy of the parametric data will determine how well the model reflects the true system response.
4.2 Vehicle Mass and Inertia Properties
For the level of detail required for most analyses, it is sufficient to treat the vehicle sprung mass (chassis) as a single rigid body. However, if the first few mode shapes are known, provide the output from the finite element eigenvalue analysis from ANSYS, MSC/NASTRAN, or COSMIC/NASTRAN. This data can be incorporated into the dynamic model to provide additional accuracy. All spinning components of the wheel such as the wheel hub and tire assembly should be combined into one. If the axle is not composed of a single rigid body then its configuration should be depicted in additional drawings and the mass/inertia properties given for each major component. All center-of-gravity location should be given relative to a point located on the ground below the center of the front axle.
4.3 Wheeled Axle Data
For the most part, all of the data asked for on this sheet is self explanatory. The collection of this particular data gives us some background on what kind of tires will be used on the vehicle, how many wheels there are per axle and whether the axles are steered, powered, or braked. Operating load under the axle is important in helping us debug the model and would be useful at not only vehicle curb weight, but also at the various off-road and on-road loading conditions.
4.4 Tire Data (vertical and lateral force)
This section of data helps us in accurately characterizing the tire mechanical properties. It is important for us to get tire data for a range of tire inflation pressures that envelope the operating ranges that will be used during vehicle operation. This covers both on-road and off-road tire inflation pressures for a variety of gross vehicle weights. Tire vertical force data should reflect non-linear force/deflection up to the point of the tire bottoming out on the rim. Tire lateral force data should cover not only a range of tire inflation pressures but also a range of slip angles and tire vertical forces.
4.5 Suspension Characteristics and Data
Because of the wide variety of suspension systems in existence today, it is difficult to be explicit when specifying data requirements for a given vehicle suspension. It is important to emphasize that suspension systems significantly affect vehicle dynamic performance while negotiating terrain and obstacles, so they must be adequately modeled. Detailed drawings defining all suspension kinematics, joint locations, and attachment points of springs, shocks, and bump stops must be provided. All dimensions should be relative to a well-defined location on the vehicle such as a point on the ground located below the center of the front axle.
When providing suspension data for the vehicle it is important to cover the entire range of operation and include enough points to depict non-linearities in the suspension . This should include jounce and rebound characteristics as well. Tabulated data is required for force-deflection relationships, but including a plot of the data showing jounce, rebound and static equilibrium is desired. For independent suspensions, it should be stated whether the suspension force-deflection data is at the spring or the wheel, and if at the wheel, what the ratio is between the two.
4.6 Supplemental Data
Additional data will be required to set up an accurate model of the vehicle system. This section covers data that would come in the form of engineering drawings. In particular, any drawings that depict the steering kinematics of the vehicle and supplemental drawings of the suspension showing damper and spring attachment points, axle attachment points, and bump stop locations. There should also be top level drawings of the vehicle including the system center-of-gravity location and overall vehicle dimensions.
4.7 Track (See the "Track Data Sheet")
Track-soil dynamics are the most difficult part of tracked vehicle modeling. Driving and braking forces are transmitted between drive train and the ground via the track. Roadwheels are isolated from terrain irregularities by the bridging of the track. Rolling resistance between wheels and track, ground deformation under the track, and track vibrations account for a significant amount of energy dissipation.
The dimensions and mass of a track segment should be given. Track pad dimensions and material properties can be used for determining displacement between roadwheel, track, and ground. The stiffness and the damping characteristics of the rubber or other material in the roadwheels and track should be provided.
If track tension is dynamically adjusted, the necessary models and parametric data should be supplied in order to include these effects in the track model.
4.8 Suspension (See the "Suspension Data Sheet")
Suspension stiffness can be characterized in a number of ways. For example, torsion bar suspensions can be represented by describing torque versus relative angle position between the hull and roadarm, torsional friction versus relative angular velocity, and torsional damping versus relative angular velocity. It is sufficient to provide this data as a table of test points. The data should also characterize jounce and rebound stops, if they exist. If the suspension force data differs between suspension units due to different torsion bar characteristics, indexing, roadarm lengths, etc., separate data for each suspension unit should be provided. Also, provide the index angle for torsion bars and the static position at the nominal vehicle configuration.
If hydro-pneumatic suspension systems are employed, and if they are adjustable, a family of suspension curves or analytical models should be provided. If active suspension compensation devices are employed and if it is expected that they will significantly affect vehicle performance, these systems should be identified and data provided to fully model their performance. Include block diagrams with all parameters listed and defined. If the system is mechanical, the linkage dimensions, geometry, attachment points, etc. should be provided. All dimensions should be provided relative to a well-defined point on the hull such as the center of the sprocket, and for attachment points on the roadarm, with respect to the radar attachment point. If electrohydraulic-mechanical suspension systems are employed, a detailed description of the system, including block diagrams with all parameters defined in sufficient detail to establish a dynamic model, should be provided.
Suspension damping forces also play an important role in dynamic simulation. Force or torque versus relative position and velocity data are required for each damper in the suspension system.
If the suspension system interacts directly with braking, steering, or the drive train, and if these interactions will significantly alter vehicle performance, adequate data to perform detailed simulations of this interaction should be provided.
4.9 Power train
Vehicle model performance on irregular terrain and over obstacles is highly dependent upon the power train model. Power train models should be capable of dynamically adjusting to varying terrain-induced loads and throttle settings for realistic transient analysis. As in other subsystems, it is difficult to be explicit about all model requirements until the system configuration is known.
As a minimum, curves of maximum torque available at the sprocket versus sprocket speed over the nominal speed range of the vehicle should be provided. Rotational inertia of the drive train, from powerpack to the output sprocket in each gear, should also be provided. Transmission and final drive schematics, with all gear ratios, gear efficiencies and automatic transmission shifting characteristics defined, would make the model even more accurate. Other factors peculiar to a given system, which may substantially affect vehicle performance, should be provided.
Associated with the power train is the vehicle steering system. Tracked vehicles steer by braking or by positive control of differential sprocket speeds. Provide a steering schematic and describe any properties of the steering system such as response time, inefficiencies, etc.
1. Sprung Vehicle Data
| Sprung Vehicle Data |
| (Use extra pages for additional bodies, if necessary) |
SPRUNG MASS DATA (at Curb and GVW condition w/o turret and weapon)
| Provide dimensioned drawings showing, with respect to a well-defined point on the chassis: |
| 1) the spatial location of the c.g. |
| 2) the roll/pitch/yaw or x-y-z axes |
| 3) the center of the chassis/turret race ring |
Chassis mass (sprung mass, excluding turret, gun, and other bodies described below) lbf-sec2/in *
| Chassis x moment of inertia at c.g. | lbf-in-sec2 ** |
| Chassis y moment of inertia at c.g. | lbf-in-sec2 |
| Chassis z moment of inertia at c.g. | lbf-in-sec2 |
| Chassis xy product of inertia at c.g. | lbf-in-sec2 |
| Chassis xz product of inertia at c.g. | lbf-in-sec2 |
| Chassis yz product of inertia at c.g. | lbf-in-sec2 |
TURRET DATA
| Provide dimensioned drawings showing, with respect to a well-defined point on the turret: |
| 1) the spatial location of the c.g. |
| 2) the inertial principal axes (x,y,z) and direction cosines |
| 3) the center of the hull/turret race ring |
| 4) the trunnion rotation axis |
Turret mass lbf-sec2/in
| Turret x moment of inertia at c.g. | lbf-in-sec2 |
| Turret y moment of inertia at c.g. | lbf-in-sec2 |
| Turret z moment of inertia at c.g. | lbf-in-sec2 |
WEAPON DATA
| Provide dimensioned drawings showing, with respect to a well-defined point on the weapon: | |
| 1) the spatial location of the c.g. | |
| 2) the inertial principal axes (x,y,z) and direction cosines | |
| 3) the trunnion rotation axis | |
| 4) the recoil axis | |
| Non-recoiling mass | lbf-sec2/in |
| The spatial location of the c.g. | |
| Non-recoiling mass x moment of inertia at c.g. | lbf-in-sec2 |
| Non-recoiling mass y moment of inertia at c.g. | lbf-in-sec2 |
| Non-recoiling mass z moment of inertia at c.g. | lbf-in-sec2 |
| Recoiling mass | lbf-sec2/in |
| The spatial location of the c.g. | |
| Recoiling mass x moment of inertia at c.g. | lbf-in-sec2 |
| Recoiling mass y moment of inertia at c.g. | lbf-in-sec2 |
| Recoiling mass z moment of inertia at c.g. | lbf-in-sec2 |
| Provide data describing: | ||
| 1) Weapon elevation/depression limits*** | / | degrees |
| 2) Weapon port/starboard azimuth limits, if applicable | / | degrees |
| 3) Weapon firing impulse at the trunnion**** | lbf-sec |
| * Mass (lbf-sec2/in) = Mass (lbm) / 386.088 |
| ** Inertia (lbf-in-sec2) = Inertia (lbm-in2) / 386.088 |
| *** or provide curves as a function of azimuth, if applicable |
| **** or provide a curve of time vs. recoil force on the trunnion |
Provide finite element model and analysis data for each body that should be considered a compliant structure.
JLTV
&8Distribution Statement A* - Approved for Public Release; distribution unlimited. (*Distribution Statement A only applies when form is not filled in)
2. Power Train Data Power Train Data
Property Comment
% Drive torque distribution to all axles (under various operating conditions)
Time to achieve 0 to 40 mph (under full throttle) on highway under operating load, seconds
Engine maximum power (hp)
Curve data of net engine torque (in-lbf) vs. speed (rpm)
Specify gear ratios and efficiencies of the power train
For tracked vehicles, reflected rotational inertia at sprocket (lbf-in-s2) Inertia (lbf-in-sec2) = Inertia (lbm-in2) / 386.088
Engine/Transmission mass (lbf-s2/in) Mass (lbf-sec2/in) = Mass (lbm) / 386.088
Engine/Transmission center-of-mass location (CG) Provide x,y,z coordinates (in); specify coordinate system
| Engine/Transmission inertia at CG (lbf-in-s2) | Provide either principal inertias and direction cosines or |
| moments- and products-of-inertia and the coordinate system used. | |
| Inertia (lbf-in-sec2) = Inertia (lbm-in2) / 386.088 |
Engine/Transmission mount locations Provide x,y,z coordinates of each mount (in); specify coordinate system
| Engine/Transmission mount stiffnesses | Provide translational (lbf/in) and rotational (in-lbf/deg) stiffnesses of each mount in x,y,z directions; specify coordinate system. |
| For nonlinear mounts, the data should be in the form of force-deflection or moment-rotation curves. |
Engine Torque (ft-lbf) verus Engine RPM and Throttle Opening (%) Torque versus RPM for full range of Percent Throttle Openings
JLTV
&8Distribution Statement A* - Approved for Public Release; distribution unlimited. (*Distribution Statement A only applies when form is not filled in)
3A. Track Data
| Track Data Sheet |
| (Use as many sheets as needed to describe the vehicle) |
| Provide dimensioned drawings showing: |
| 1) the spatial position of the sprocket center with respect to the hull c.g. |
| 2) the spatial position of the idler (if one is present) center with respect to the hull c.g. |
| 3) a track link, with the spatial location of pin rotation axes indicated |
| 4) support rollers, track-tensioner |
| 4) a general view of the entire track, sprocket, idler, suspension system |
| Provide the indicated data | Track 1 | Track 2 | Track 3 | Track 4 |
| Sprocket radius (in) | ||||
| Sprocket weight (lbs) | ||||
| Sprocket spin inertia (lb-in-sec2) | ||||
| Number of teeth on Sprocket | ||||
| Pitch radius of the Sprocket (in) | ||||
| Addendum radius of Sprocket (in) | ||||
| Dedendum radius of Sprocket (in) | ||||
| Idler radius (in) | ||||
| Idler weight (lbs) | ||||
| Idler spin inertia (lb-in-sec2) | ||||
| Number of teeth on the Idler | ||||
| Pitch radius of the Idler (in) | ||||
| Addendum radius of the Idler (in) | ||||
| Dedendum radius of the Idler (in) | ||||
| Track link length, pin-to-pin (in) | ||||
| Track link width (in) | ||||
| Track thickness (in) | ||||
| Track link weight (lbs) | ||||
| CG location of track link (in)* | ||||
| x | ||||
| y | ||||
| z | ||||
| Total number of track links | ||||
| Diameter of the track link pin (in) | ||||
| Height of the track link center guide (in) | ||||
| Length of the track link center guide (in) | ||||
| Track length (in) | ||||
| Track long. stiffness (lbf/in) | ||||
| Number of track pads/link | ||||
| Track pad length (in) | ||||
| Track pad width (in) | ||||
| Track pad thickness (in) | ||||
| Total area of track pad per link (in^2) | ||||
| Track pad rubber stiffness (lbf/in) | ||||
| Track pad rubber damping (lbf/sec2) | ||||
| Weight of the support roller, lb | ||||
| Radius of the support roller, in | ||||
| *Provide the CG w.r.t. the known easily understood reference frame (specify) |
Ver 1.0 (Original, Unmodified)
Dynamics & Structures Team
3B. Track Suspension Data
| Track Suspension Data Sheet |
| (Use as many sheets as needed to describe the vehicle) |
| TRACK # |
| Provide a Table of (x,y,z) locations AND a dimensioned drawings showing: |
| 1) spatial location on the hull, with respect to the hull c.g. or other well defined point on the hull, of the attachment point of each suspension element (roadarm, spring, damper, bump stop) |
| 2) the roadarm with the spatial location of its hull attachment point, roadwheel attachment point, spring/damper attachment points, c.g., and principal axes |
| 3) the roadwheel with the spatial location of its roadarm attachment point, c.g., and principal axes |
Roadwheels are numbered from the idler (if present) to the sprocket
| Parameter | RW# 1 | RW# 2 | RW# 3 | RW# 4 | RW# 5 | RW# 6 | RW# 7 | RW# 8 | RW# 9 | RW# 10 |
| Road arm weight (lb) | ||||||||||
| Road arm inertias (lb-in-sec2) | ||||||||||
| X | ||||||||||
| Y | ||||||||||
| Z | ||||||||||
| Road wheel radius (in) | ||||||||||
| Road wheel width (in) | ||||||||||
| Roadwheel weight (lb) | ||||||||||
| Roadwheel inertias (lb-in-sec2) | ||||||||||
| X | ||||||||||
| Y | ||||||||||
| Z | ||||||||||
| Radius of the hub (in) | ||||||||||
| Lateral distance between wheels for the center-guide (in) | ||||||||||
| Torsional stiffness (lbf/rad)* | ||||||||||
| Torsional friction (lbf-sec/rad)* | ||||||||||
| Torsional damping (lbf-sec/rad)* | ||||||||||
| Index angle (free angle) (rad) | ||||||||||
| Road arm angle, nominal load (rad) | ||||||||||
| Nominal load on the ground (lb) | ||||||||||
| Nominal load in track-tensioner (lb) | ||||||||||
| Track-tensioner stiffness (lb/in) | ||||||||||
| Rebound stop damping (lbf-sec/in)** |
| * if present or provide curve (if non-linear) |
| ** or provide curve |
Ver 1.0 (Original, Unmodified)
Dynamics & Structures Team
3C. Susp Spring-Damper Data Suspension Spring/Damper/Bump-Stop Data (COPY and PASTE Table for each roadwheel station)
| Replicate these tables for each roadwheel station | ||
| Roadwheel 1, 2, 3… | Nominal Spring Force at design load: | (lbf) |
Index angle (free angle) deg Roadwheel angle when contacting bump stop: (deg) Roadwheel angle when contacting rebound stop: (deg)
Spring Displacement to Wheel Center Displacement Ratio (in/in) Damper Displacement to Wheel Center Displacement Ratio (in/in) Jounce Bumper Displacement to Wheel Center Displacement Ratio (in/in)
| Spring Force-Deflection Data (1,2,5) | Shock Force-Velocity Data (3,4,5) | Jounce Bump-Stop Force-Deflection Data (1,5) | Rebound Stop Force-Deflection Data (1,5) | ||||||||
| Deflection (in) | Force Loading (lbf) | Force Unloading (lbf) | Velocity (in/s) | Force Loading (lbf) | Force Unloading (lbf) | Deflection (in) | Force Loading (lbf) | Force Unloading (lbf) | Deflection (in) | Force Loading (lbf) | Force Unloading (lbf) |
| Provide data on jounce bump-stop damping characteristics also if available |
| Provide 3D force-displacement-velocity data for hydro-pneumatic struts |
| Provide 3D force-displacement-static load data for air springs |
| (1) Include sufficient data to adequately represent nonlinear characteristics of the curves |
| (2) For linear springs, spring stiffness value would suffice |
| (3) Include sufficient data to adequately represent nonlinear characteristics of the shock curve up to +/- 3 m/s (~120 in/s) |
| (4) Identify shock curve polarity whether extension (rebound) or compression (jounce) is positive |
| (5) Indicate whether the data provided is for individual component or suspension assembly |
| (6) Verify that the data provided is at the component location (NOT at the wheel center) |
JLTV
&8Distribution Statement A* - Approved for Public Release; distribution unlimited. (*Distribution Statement A only applies when form is not filled in)
3H. Vehicle Geometry Data Vehicle Geometry Data
(1) Provide a table of (x,y,z location) in a clearly defined reference frame. Also, provide the dimensioned drawings showing position*, geometry, connectivity, and layout of the following:
| (a) Suspension springs | |
| (b) Suspension dampers | |
| (c) Bump stops and rebound stops | |
| (d) Torque rods, panhard rod, sway bar, and other suspension components | |
| (e) Suspension and Steering linkages and steering system schematics | |
| (f) Vehicle hitch point (if there are trailers) | |
| (g) Road wheels, Sprockets, Idler, Support rollers, track-tensioner, etc, | |
| (h) Hull geometry indicating ground clearance | |
| (i) Power train schematics | |
| (j) Vehicle center of gravity location with and without payload (Identify operating load condition) | |
| (k) Top level drawings showing overall vehicle dimensions | |
| (2) Provide Parasolid or STEP files of the various geometry (sprocket with tooth profile, track-links, center-guide, idler, etc.) |
| Suspension and Steering Controls Algorithms | |
| (3) Provide necessary details of all intelligent control algorithms that affect analytical assessment of vehicle ride and handling includes but not limited to steering, active/semi active suspension, MR dampers, and braking etc. Explicit schematic with description of each input/output channels, polarity and the model (simulink, or Matlab etc.) are required. The control model must be provided either as Simulink or Matlab functions with necessary information and cooperation to allow linking to the Govt's multi-body codes. Algorithms can only be compiled for a 64-bit, windows environment. Incomplete models that cannot be connected to Govt codes, will not be accepted. |
| (4) If a hydraulic, air, or active suspension is used, provide a schematic of the interconnectivity of the system, |
| a control diagram with appropriate values for compressibility, bulk modulus, leadage, response, and |
| lag of all hydraulic and mechanical components. |
JLTV
&8Distribution Statement A* - Approved for Public Release; distribution unlimited. (*Distribution Statement A only applies when form is not filled in) image1.png
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .