Attachment_0043_After_Action_Report_Sample.docx
DOCX document 84 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Optionally Manned Fighting Vehicle (OMFV) Draft Request for Proposal (RFP) W56HZV-22-R-0026
- Solicitation number
- W56HZV-22-R-0026
About this file
This draft request for proposal concerns the Optionally Manned Fighting Vehicle program. The Army seeks proposals for the detailed design, prototype build, and test phase. Interested parties must submit any comments on the draft RFP, performance specification, or common infrastructure architecture to the Army by May 2nd using the provided comment resolution matrix templates. Classified documents related to this opportunity require verification of facility clearances and security certifications. Proposers must also obtain controlled unclassified documents through the proper channels by demonstrating a valid governmental purpose and signing non-disclosure agreements.
View the file
Other files
Show all 49
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment 0043 After Action Report Sample Solicitation No. W56HZV-22-R-0026 Attachment 0043 After Action Report Sample Solicitation No. W56HZV-22-R-0026
Attachment 0043 After Action Report Sample
Solicitation No.: W56HZV-22-R-0026 Date: 29 March 2022
Distribution Statement A: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.
SECURITY NOTICE: Contractor responses to the data requirements are likely to be at the Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) level.
All CUI responses should be marked with the following CUI Designation Indicator and Distribution Statement:
Controlled by: the name of the Offeror company (not required if identified in the letterhead) Controlled by: identification of the office creating the document CUI Category(ies): CTI, EXPT Distribution Statement: D POC: name and phone number or email of POC
DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT D: Distribution authorized to the Department of Defense and U.S. DoD contractors; Specific Authority: DoDM 5200.01 and DoDM 5200.45, date of determination is: 26 December 2018. Other requests for this document shall be referred to the attention of the PM Maneuver Combat Systems (MCS) Security Manager at: Program Executive Office Ground Combat Systems (PEO GCS), ATTN: SFAE-GCS-M, 6501 East Eleven Mile Road, Detroit Arsenal, MI 48397-5000.
WARNING - This document contains technical data whose export is restricted by the Arms Export Control Act (Title 22, U.S.C., Sec 2751, et seq.) or the Export Administration Act of 1979 (Title 50, U.S.C., App. 2401 et seq.), as amended. Violations of these export laws are subject to severe criminal penalties. Disseminate in accordance with provisions of DoD Directive 5230.25.
Attachment 0043 After Action Report Sample Solicitation No. W56HZV-22-R-0026
CUI
1 | Page
CUI
| Revision # |
| Date |
| Change Description |
| 000 |
| 3/29/2022 |
| a. Base Document |
After Action Review (AAR) Sample
Date:
Student Name:
Unit/Org:
Course Title:
Purpose for training (Test or Logistics event training is supporting):
We want to provide you with the most effective training possible, now and in future training sessions. Please take a moment to answer the following questions. It is through your feedback that we improve our instruction and better serve your needs. Thank you!
Please tell us something about yourself.
Active Reserves National Guard Civilian
1. MOS:
2. Age:
3. Rank:
4. Years in Service:
Please answer the following questions as best you can.
5. The topics covered were:
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
| Not Sufficient | |||||||||
| Extremely Sufficient |
Comments:
6. The time allotted for each topic was? Please provide any necessary comments.
Too Long Too Short Well Planned
7. Was there a topic or major action that was not covered or needs additional coverage in future training? If yes, please provide comments.
Yes | No
8. The instructor’s ability to provide essential information was:
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
| Not Sufficient | |||||||||
| Extremely Sufficient |
9. The amount of hands on training was: Please provide comments as necessary.
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
| Not Sufficient | |||||||||
| Extremely Sufficient |
10. The training aids were:
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
| Not Sufficient | |||||||||
| Extremely Sufficient |
11. What do you think of the quality of the training materials?
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
| Low | |||||||||
| High |
12. The methods of instruction were?
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
| Not Sufficient | |||||||||
| Extremely Sufficient |
13. What segments of training were most valuable?
14. What segments of training were least valuable?
15. Any additional comments or suggestions?
Thank you for completing this critique. Your responses will help us make the best possible training available for you and your unit.
2 | Page
5 | Page image1.png image2.jpeg
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .